Countering violence in the name of God in present day Palestine/Israel.
Khader, Jamal
Talking about the Middle East since the beginning of this century,
no one can avoid talking about "religion," "religious
tension," "religious terrorism" etc. The conflict in
Israel/Palestine is often presented as a "religious conflict,"
mainly between Muslims and Jews. The Holy Land is holy for the three
monotheistic religions: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. What is the
role of religion in the conflict? Is the conflict a "religious
one"? Is violence inherent to religion? In history, religions were
often promoters of violence and religions. Are religions playing again
the same role in inciting to violence, especially after 9/11?
This article takes a close look at the role of religion, and
especially religious fundamentalism in the Middle East, and more
specifically the Holy Land and its influence on the Palestinian--Israeli
conflict. The question remains: Is religion in the Palestine--Israel
conflict part of the problem or part of the solution? As simple or naive
as this question may seem, the future of justice and peace in the Middle
East depends on the answer.
Fundamentalism in General
We may define fundamentalism as "the affirmation of religious
authority as holistic and absolute, admitting of neither criticism nor
reduction; it is expressed through the collective demand that specific
creedal and ethical dictates derived from scripture be publicly
recognized and legally enforced. The fundamentalists of the three
Abrahamic religions feel it is their mission to establish earthly
theocracies in preparation for the arrival of a messiah. They use
political influence to enact government laws and regulations that will
give their beliefs the force of secular law thereby forcing everyone to
live according to their moral precepts." (1)
Several writers have studied fundamentalism and its common
characteristics. (2) Theologically, we can see several traits that may
lead to fundamentalism, and eventually to violence in the name of God.
First, each of the three monotheistic religions claims to be the
one true religion of God on earth. Each has the right to do so, but if
this means in the process the fight to prove the others are wrong, the
conclusions are different. The logic of "true or wrong,"
"light or darkness," "white or black" tends to
divide the world into righteous people and evil ones; then the battle is
ready to get rid of the evil, in the name of God. (3)
Second, violence is not expressed only in physical violence;
exclusiveness is another characteristic. The example of the Holy Land is
clear. This land is holy for Jews, Christians, and Muslims. To exclude
the others seems to be the logic of many to preserve the holiness of the
land.
Third, holy scriptures represent the basics of any religion. The
possibility of different interpretations or a selection of these texts,
together with a lack of authority to define the truth of these texts,
can pave the way to manipulation of these texts for political reasons,
where someone may look for a pretext or excuse to support their own
ideology.
Fourth, fundamentalists take a simplistic approach. Because the
situation is complex, fundamentalists tend to oversimplify the questions
and the answers. "God gave us the land (the Holy Land)," is
one of these slogans that can convince people to join the struggle to do
"God's will".
Fifth and finally, pretending to speak in God's name and
defending his interests may lead to a legitimization of war: be it in
the name of forthcoming eschatological times, the fulfilment of
God's promises of a land, or to spread the "true"
religion of God.
In the Middle East, religion and politics are mixed. Facing
problems and challenges, every believer searches for answers in their
own faith. If answers are not to be sought through a dialectical common
search of all the believers, the easiest way is to address a strong
leader who "has all the answers." If these "ready
answers" are not questioned, the leader bears the responsibility of
leading his audience into a one-sided vision.
Islam
The response of the Palestinians, after the Arab defeat of 1948 and
1967, was political, secularist, and nationalist. The Palestinian cause
was seen by Palestinians as a national disaster, where struggle should
lead to the return of Palestinians to their land and the foundation of a
secular and democratic state. (4) The religious argument was totally
absent from their literature.
With the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and
especially after the Iranian revolution in 1979, the religious dimension
became more evident. The Islamic movement began its interpretation of
the conflict in religious terms.
Faithful to the Muslim Brotherhood way in establishing a Muslim
society from the grassroots, the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas),
founded by Sheikh Ahmed Yasin, initiated the type of welfare program
that was associated with the Muslim Brotherhood. It established a
charitable network in the Gaza Strip, consisting of clinics,
drug-rehabilitation programs, youth clubs, sporting facilities, and
Quran classes.
Hamas and the Islamic Jihad interpreted the Palestinian tragedy in
religious terms. This came about "because the people had neglected
their religion"; "Palestinians would only shake off Israeli
rule when they return to Islam." (5) They were fighting a battle
for the future of the entire ummah. Islamic Jihad was interested in
armed struggle against Israel: "Palestine is a a waqf (religious
endowment) land. It is a sharia (Islamic judicial system) ruling that
any land acquired by the Muslims by force is proclaimed Islamic
endowment for the Muslims. It is an eternal Islamic heritage." (6)
This claim becomes exclusive.
Hamas deplores the loss of Islamic values. Their fight is in the
name of God. Their objectives are "the fighting against the false,
defeating it and vanquishing it so that justice could prevail, homelands
be retrieved and from its mosques would the voice of the mu'azen
emerge declaring the establishment of the state of Islam."
As there is no solution for the Palestinian question except through
Jihad, the individual duty of every Muslim, Hamas considers the
"initiatives, and peaceful solutions and international conferences,
in contradiction to its principles," they are considered "a
waste of time and vain endeavors." The link between religion and
nationalism is strong; it considers that "abusing any part of
Palestine is abuse directed against part of religion. Nationalism of the
Islamic Resistance Movement is part of its religion ... Hamas does not
consider these conferences capable of realizing the demands, restoring
the rights or doing justice to the oppressed. These [peace] conferences
are only ways of setting the infidels in the land of the Muslims as
arbitrators."
Hamas considers the Palestinian problem to be a religious one, and
should be dealt with on this basis. And "Jihad is not confined to
the carrying of arms and the confrontation of the enemy. The effective
word, the good article, the useful book, support and
solidarity--together with the presence of sincere purpose for the
hoisting of Allah's banner higher and higher--all these are
elements of the Jihad for Allah's sake."
Finally Hamas asks the Arab and Islamic peoples to back and support
Hamas, "as Allah wants them to, extending to it more and more funds
till Allah's purpose is achieved." And when will this
"purpose" be achieved? The same Covenant predicts that there
will be a "constant struggle till the Day of Judgment in the Holy
Land."
As we see, Hamas, as part of the Islamic fundamentalism as lived in
Palestine, makes its own reading of the Quran, and is convinced it is
doing God's will. To defend the holiness of the land and God's
rights, Hamas is ready to fight the eschatological battle "till the
Day of Judgment." Hamas is nourished by the uncertainty of the
situation, poverty, religious feelings, and the absence of any future
and just solution of the Palestinian problem. It constitutes a typical
phenomenon of fundamentalism.
Islamic fundamentalism inspired not only Hamas, but a wide range of
the Palestinian population: suicide bombers come from the Fatah
movement, from the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP),
a Marxist inspired movement, as well as from Hamas. What used to be a
national and a territorial problem has taken on an impressive religious
dimension.
Judaism
Jewish fundamentalism is no different from Islamic. The argument is
simple: "God gave us this land, it is a Holy Land (Eretz Yesrael);
it is ours and only ours"; "if the State of Israel was viewed
as the unfolding of a Messianic scenario, then the miraculous victory of
the 1967 War was an essential stage in that process. The territories
belong to the Jewish people (i.e., the State of Israel) by Divine decree
and they may not be handed over to foreign hands."
As an example of Jewish fundamentalism, the Gush Emunim movement is
clear.
Israeli occupation of the West Bank in the 1967 War aroused in many
Israelis a passionate determination that these territories should be
permanently joined to the State of Israel. Future members of Gush
Emunim--whose founders first formulated the settlement ideology
(7)--became active in establishing Jewish settlements in the occupied
territories. Not until after the 1973 War, however, did they feel a need
to organize politically. After the first territorial concessions in the
Sinai Peninsula, the founders of Gush Emunim determined to organize in
order to oppose further territorial concessions and to promote the
extension of Israeli sovereignty over the occupied territories.
All of Gush Emunim's spiritual authorities and many of its
leaders were educated by Avraham Yitzhak ha-Cohen Kook, the first
Ashkenazi chief rabbi of Israel. Kook believed that the era of
redemption for the Jewish people had already begun with the rise of
modern Zionism and the growing Zionist enterprise in Palestine. (8)
Israel's victory in the 1967 War transformed the status of
Kook's theology. Suddenly it became clear to his students that they
were indeed living in the messianic age. Ordinary reality assumed a
sacred aspect; every event possessed theological meaning and was part of
the meta-historical process of redemption. (9) Though shared by many
religious authorities, this view was most effectively expounded by
Kook's son, Rabbi Zvi Yehuda Kook, the influential Rabbi in modern
Jewish thought. The younger Kook defined the State of Israel as the
halakhic kingdom of Israel, and the Kingdom of Israel as the kingdom of
heaven on earth. The belief that they are living in the messianic age
and that redemption is at hand has operational consequences for Gush
members.
Almost all the biblical rules regarding the Kingdom of Israel are
literally applicable in the messianic age. (10) Gush Emunim recognizes
as its sole authority a selective interpretation of the Jewish religious
law. Their aim is to create a "halachic Jewish state," (11) a
theocracy where the only law is religious in nature and all obligations
and rights are defined in ancient religious terms. Their "Land of
Israel" is not a strip of land with territorial boundaries; it is
instead a spiritual and theological concept that must be realized.
To understand Gush Emunim, it is necessary to see how they manage
to meld politics and religion. By self-definition, they are a group of
devoted religious believers for whom the concept of compromise is
practically foreign. They know the Truth, and of course Truth cannot be
compromised or abandoned in any manner.
According to the fundamentalists of Gush Emunim, the Land of
Israel--every grain of its soil--is holy. Thus no individual can escape
holiness and every place upon which a Jewish foot is set is holy (12);
and no one can alienate a square inch for either peace or security. In
1979 the Rabbinate ruled that no part of the Holy Land could be
alienated even in the context of a peace treaty: "According to our
holy Torah and unequivocal and decisive halakhic rulings, there exists a
severe prohibition to pass to foreigners the ownership of any piece of
the land of Israel since it was made sacred by Abraham's
Covenant." (13)
The Kookist rabbis were especially incensed by the Oslo Accords:
"By signing away the sacred land, the government had committed a
criminal act." (14) Some saw Israel Prime Minister Rabin as
actively threatening the life of Jews. Yigal Amir, a former student of a
religious school, said that his study of Jewish law had persuaded him
that Rabin was an enemy of the Jewish people; he had a duty to kill him.
(15) And he did.
Rabbi Israel Ariel, in an interview, was asked about current
political constraints and diplomatic limitations, the rabbi replied that
Joshua had far worse political constraints and limitations. When pressed
further about potential casualties and national losses, the rabbi
referred to a biblical ruling that in a holy war no question about
casualties is legitimate until one-fifth of the nation is extinct. (16)
What role do the Gush Emunim fundamentalists accord the Palestinian
Arabs in the age of Jewish redemption? What rights, if any, should they
retain in the Holy Land of Israel? For years Gush spokesmen enumerated
"three alternatives" to be presented to Arabs: acknowledge the
legitimacy of the Zionist doctrine (Gush Emunim's version); obey
the laws of the state without formal recognition of Zionism and in
return receive the rights of resident aliens (with no political rights);
or emigrate to Arab countries. (17)
This position stems from the conviction that the notion of
universal human rights is a foreign ideal that has no meaning in the
context of the Holy Land. (18) In the Bible, non-Jewish inhabitants of
Palestine were accorded the status of resident aliens, enjoying some
privileges but never obtaining rights equal to those of the Jews. One
consequence of this view is that in time of war no distinction should be
made between enemy soldiers and civilians since both are of the category
of people who do not belong in the land.
The followers of Rabbi Kook concentrated only on the more
aggressive biblical passages, in which God commanded the Israelites to
drive out the indigenous people of the Promised Land, to make no treaty
with them, to destroy their sacred symbols, and even to exterminate them
(Ex. 23:23-33; Josh. 6:17-21; 8:20-29; 11:21-25). They interpreted the
belief that the Jews were God's chosen people to mean that they
were not bound by the laws obligatory for other nations, but were
unique, holy, and set apart. God's command to conquer the land,
argued Rabbi Shlomo Aviner, was more important than "the human and
moral considerations of the national rights of the gentiles to our
land." (19) Their reading of the Bible is selective.
Despite their small number, Gush Emunim enjoyed the support of many
Israeli politicians, such as Menachem Begin, Yizhaq Shamir, and Ariel
Sharon. (20) In 1978, its official settlement organization was
recognized by the World Zionist Organization. (21)
The concepts of "promised Land" and "chosen
people" may imply that the possession of the land is exclusive to
one religion "by divine law" ("This land was given to us
by God," they argue); therefore, Israel is represented as the
historical realization of the biblical aspiration of the return to the
"promised land." And Jewish blood is more valuable than any
other blood. Someone said once, "When the Jew is humiliated, God is
shamed! When the Jew is attacked--it is an assault upon the Name of
God!" (22)
What is important for us is to see the implications of these ideas
on the conflict of the Middle East. The question is as follows: Is
Israel a state like any other state, regulated by international law? Or
should it be treated differently because it is "the realization of
divine promises"?
The results of such beliefs are disastrous for the Palestinians and
for the possibilities of peace in the Holy Land. Palestinians are
dispossessed of their land, they are not recognized as citizens with
equal rights because the state is "Jewish," the settlements
are built on their land in the name of "returning to biblical
sites," refugees are denied the right to return home to what became
Israel or even to the Occupied Territories (because they represent a
"demographic danger" to the Jewish identity of the state of
Israel). In their struggle to obtain their legitimate rights,
Palestinians are faced with theological arguments about the divine law.
In the name of God, human beings are humiliated and basic human rights
are denied.
Christian Zionism
Christian Zionism represents the Christian version of
fundamentalism. Some may argue that Christian Zionism is an American
phenomenon; this is true, but the special interest of Christian Zionism
in the Holy Land makes it a Middle Eastern phenomenon.
Christian Zionism is based upon three fundamental pillars:
First, a Biblical vision of the world: an attempt to read
contemporary events within a Biblical grid.
Second, the eschatological question: When will Jesus return?
Christian Zionists strongly promote the idea that we are at the end of
times and that Christ's return is imminent. World events are seen
as playing out this end of time scenario.
Third, a focus on the Jewish people and the State of Israel:
Christian Zionism holds that the promises to the Church for the end of
time, regarding the universal recognition of Jesus Christ as Lord and
Saviour, must be preceded by the fulfilment of the Old Testament
promises to Israel. These promises include the return of the Jews to
their homeland, the establishment of a Jewish state, and the building of
the third temple. This will ultimately provoke the end of time war that
must precede the second coming of Christ. Jews should return to the Holy
Land in order to hasten the return of Jesus Christ. God would then use
Israel as a divine instrument in the punishment of the unbelievers.
These ideas grew in popularity within Christian evangelical circles,
particularly in the US after the establishment of the State of Israel
and even more so after the 1967 war and the Israeli conquest and
occupation of the Biblical heartland of Judaea and Samaria.
The fundamentalist reading of Old Testament history and prophecy
passages focuses on the themes of election, people, and land. The
biblical text is understood without any historical context or critical
distance and the events described in the Bible are applied to present
realities. An untroubled continuity is seen between the Jewish
commonwealth in Palestine before 70 AD and the emergence of the State of
Israel in 1948. The Land has been promised to the Jews and this promise
is as valid today as it was in the days of Abraham. God's plan was
always to work redemption through Israel. It was only because Israel
refused Jesus Christ that the church was founded, this vision being
founded on a reading of Romans 9-11. According to Christian Zionism, the
events of 1948 (the establishment of the State of Israel) and 1967
(extension of Jewish sovereignty over the Old City of Jerusalem) seem to
point to the approaching end.
Particular eschatological passages in the Old Testament (23) and in
the New Testament (Luke 21:21-24, 1; Thess. 4-5; Apocalypse of Saint
John) are used to foretell in very precise terms the triumph of
"God's people" in cataclysmic events. This is understood
as beginning to be fulfilled in our present times.
Christian Zionists tend not only to know the details of these
events but also the timetable for their realization. The years 1948 and
1967 are important turning points, as the eschatological clock has
started ticking to mark the beginning of the end. In the time of
tribulation (see Mark 13; Apocalypse 12-19) that precedes the second
coming of Christ, Israel will fight the wars of the Lord. This will
culminate in the battle of Armageddon (Apocalypse 19). After Christ
returns, the thousand years (millennial) rule of Christ will begin that
will culminate in the ultimate defeat of Satan and his emissaries. This
time chart is full of violence, war and destruction.
In this war scenario, Islam and Muslims play the role of the powers
of darkness. (24) Israel will confront Islam and bring it to its knees.
Muslims have two options according to the Christian Zionist view: they
can either convert to Christianity, accepting the Christian Zionist
view, or they can die in the cataclysmic events of the end of time.
Christian Arabs, in fact, have the same option as the Muslims.
Christian Zionism's fusion of religion with politics works to
guarantee Israeli interests. A scriptural foundation of this political
behaviour is God's word to Abraham that God "will bless those
that bless you and curse those that curse you" (Gen. 12:2).
However, it is important to note that although Christian Zionism seems
to be pro-Jewish, it is not pro-Judaism. In the end, Jews have the same
ultimate choice as Muslims: confess Jesus Christ or be swallowed up in
the end time catastrophes.
The alliance is particularly strong between the religious elements
in the Jewish Israeli right wing and the Christian Zionists. However,
the alliance is a tense and fragile one.
Right-wing Jewish Zionists focus on present need (in the present
situation of war they need the support of the Christian Zionists who
constitute an important political lobby in the US), whereas Christian
Zionists focus on apocalyptic future (the Jews will be believers in
Christ). Religious Jews are profoundly uncomfortable with the
proselytizing of Christian Zionists and Christian Zionists are
profoundly uncomfortable with the anti-Christian attitudes of right-wing
religious Jews. Moments of tension have emerged on various issues. (25)
However, shared interests include opposition to any territorial
compromise in negotiations with the Palestinians, support for the
colonization of all Palestinian territories, insistence on the unity of
Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty, encouraging Jewish immigration to
Israel, encouraging Palestinian Arabs to leave Palestine, and hostility
towards Islam and Arab nationalism.
Christian Zionism was and still is influential in political life in
the US and in the religious media. Christian Zionism has tragic effects
on the Christians of the Arab world and their churches. The common
people are not always able to distinguish between these sectarian groups
and Christianity. At the very least, they embarrass the Christian
churches, especially in the Holy Land. It is known that these people
organize arrogant, triumphalistic, and provocative manifestations in the
Old City of Jerusalem on the occasion of Succot (Feast of Tabernacles)
and other Jewish festivities under the protection of the Israeli police
and soldiers. Christian Zionism has a strong proselytizing movement
within the Christian community in the Holy Land. They affect negatively
their reading the Bible (mainly the relation between the Old and New
Testament), their dialogue with Muslims, and the possibility of a
positive and dialogic understanding of Judaism.
Christian Zionism is a mixture of religious fundamentalism,
apocalyptic visions, messianic interpretations, political ideology, and
societal projects.
Positive Role of Religion in Palestine/Israel?
More than a dozen senior Christian, Jewish, and Muslim leaders from
the Holy Land met in Alexandria, Egypt, in January 2002 and concluded an
unprecedented joint declaration pledging themselves to work together for
a just and lasting peace. The agreement, which was thereafter known as
the "First Declaration of Alexandria of the Religious Leaders of
the Holy Land," pledges the faith leaders to use their religious
and moral authority to work for an end to violence and the resumption of
the peace process. It also envisages the establishment of a permanent
committee of leaders from the three religions in the Holy Land to pursue
the implementation of the declaration.
The main points in the Alexandria declaration are that the violence
in the Holy Land is an evil that must be opposed by all people of good
faith, as are incitement, hatred, and the misrepresentation of the
other.
First, the Holy Land is holy to all three of our faiths. Therefore,
followers of the divine religions must respect its sanctity, and
bloodshed must not be allowed to pollute it. The sanctity and integrity
of the holy places must be preserved, and the freedom of religious
worship must be ensured for all.
Second, Palestinians and Israelis must respect the divinely
ordained purposes of the Creator by whose grace they live in the same
land that is called holy.
Third, political leaders need to work for a just, secure, and
durable solution in the spirit of the words of the Almighty and the
prophets.
Fourth, there must be a religiously sanctioned cease-fire,
respected and observed from all sides.
Fifth, we need to create an atmosphere where present and future
generations will co-exist with mutual respect and trust in the other.
That is why everyone should refrain from incitement and demonization,
and educate our future generations accordingly.
Sixth, the declaration calls for a joint quest for a just peace
that leads to reconciliation in Jerusalem and the Holy Land, for the
common good of all our peoples.
A permanent joint committee was established to carry out the
recommendations of this declaration, and to engage with the respective
political leadership accordingly. The principal outcome of this Cairo
consultation was an increase in the grassroots understanding of the
religious dynamics of the Israeli--Palestinian conflict, with a resolve
to educate and create a positive environment for effective dialogue.
Ultimately, the aim of these consultations is to create a consensus
within the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim delegations in order for
inter-religious dialogue to proceed effectively and augment the efforts
of the political track of the Middle East peace process. After ten years
of the Alexandria declaration, the process is very slow and no visible
outcomes can be seen.
Kairos Palestine: An Inclusive Approach
Religion tends to play a negative role in the Holy Land. Aware of
this negative role, and being believers at the same time, the authors of
the Kairos document wanted to be authentic to their faith and honest in
accepting the challenges of faith.
A brief reading of the Kairos document (26) shows the following.
First, the document calls for an inclusive approach: although the Kairos
is a Palestinian document, its calls for peace, justice, and security
for all the inhabitants of this land. Second, instead of a choice of
selected texts that may support our position, it affirms that all the
Bible is the word of God; we looked at some of the most difficult texts
and we tried to understand what the text tells us, not we want make the
text say. Third, the document considered the issue of the other: he or
she is a brother or sister; we are all created at the image of God. This
image gives every human being their own dignity. Fourth, the document
considers "the Land." It is God's land, and we are
stewards of this land. Even if every one of the three monotheistic
religions believes that this land is unique, we ask if there is a way
that we can share the land? Universality as the mission of the land is
not opposed to its particularity for each religion. This land cannot be
exclusive.
The vision of the Kairos document is a vision of justice, peace and
dignity for all, to begin with those who need it most, the Palestinians;
but it does not exclude anyone.
Conclusion
As a French intellectual puts it, with some irony: "Les
fondamentalistes veulent faire la volonte de Dieu, que Dieu le veuille
ou pas" (fundamentalists want to do the will of God whether God
wants it or not). Every religious fundamentalist makes the same claim.
The way that the fundamentalist justifies the exercise of his influence
and power in society is that God is on his side, and needs his efforts
to see that God's work is done.
Fundamentalism is a danger in our world and a threat to peace and a
just settlement of the Middle Eastern crisis. Its system of ideas is not
limited to small numbers of fundamentalists; it influences the
comprehension of Religion for large masses.
Through its faith and total integrity to its roots, whether Muslim,
Jewish or Christian, society must shape for itself a new vision of the
God in whom it believes. In other words, society needs a new vision of
the God to whom it submits its life, along with a new vision of all the
children of God who are different from us.
Our reality in the Holy Land is one of suffering, humiliation, and
fear. The person believing in God is capable of more than hatred and
revenge. They have a spiritual power that enables them to be victorious
and to put an end to all that. We can believe in God as the source of
love and peace through our faith in God. We can avoid the path of
killing or hatred that spoils the purity of religion and that is born
inside the spirit of man. The dignity of each person is God-given. We
are all equal in this dignity. Without justice--that is, whenever rights
are being violated--the way of peace remains closed. Only the ways of
peace can lead to peace; peace will only be the fruit of peace.
DOI: 10.1111/erev.12200
(1) Florien Wineriter, head of a humanist institute in New York.
(2) For example: Hava Lazarus-Yafeh, "Contemporary
Fundamentalism: Judaism, Christianity, Islam," in Jewish
Fundamentalism in Comparative Perspective: Religion, Ideology, and the
Crisis of Modernity, ed. Laurence J. Silberstein (New York and London:
1993), 42-55.
(3) http://www.human-nature.com/rmyoung/papers/pap135h.htm
(4) See: The Palestinian National Charter (17 July 1968) where the
only mention of religion is the following: "The liberation of
Palestine, from a spiritual point of view, will provide the Holy Land
with an atmosphere of safety' and tranquility, which in turn will
safeguard the country's religious sanctuaries and guarantee freedom
of worship and of visit to all, without discrimination of race, color,
language, or religion." Basic Political Documents of the Armed
Palestinian Resistance Movement, ed. Leila S. Kadi (Beirut: Palestine
Research Centre, 1969), 137-41. All quotes from the Covenant of the
Islamic Resistance Movement are from this book.
(5) Beverley Milton-Edwards, Islamic Politics in Palestine (London
and New York: 1996), 184-85.
(6) The Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Art. 11):
"The Islamic Resistance Movement believes that the land of
Palestine is an Islamic Waqf consecrated for future Muslim generations
until Judgment Day. It, or any part of it, should not be squandered: it,
or any part of it, should not be given up ... Palestine is an Islamic
Waqf land consecrated for Muslim generations until Judgement Day. This
is the law governing the land of Palestine according to the Islamic
Sharia (law) and the same goes for any land the Muslims have conquered
by force, because during the times of (Islamic) conquests, the Muslims
consecrated these lands to Muslim generations till the Day of
Judgment."
(7) Ehud Sprinzak, (ed.), Gush Emumin, The Politics of Zionist
Fundamentalism in Israel (The American Jewish Committee, Institute of
Human Relations, 1986). See, "Gush Emunim: The First Decade"
(Hebrew), Nekuda 69 (1984), 5-7.
(8) See Zyi Yaron, The Teaching of RavKook (Hebrew), 3rd ed.
(Jerusalem: Jewish Agency, 1979), 270-73.
(9) Zvi Raanan, Gush Emunim (Hebrew) (Tel Aviv: Sifriyat Poalim,
1980), 64-67.
(10) See Yaron, Teaching of Ran Kook.
(11) Halakha is the name of the system of Jewish religious law
that, according to the Orthodox tradition, is based on the divine
revelation to Moses at Sinai and has been handed down, developed, and
interpreted by the sages from generation to generation. Halakhic
principles and rules apply to all aspects of human conduct.
(12) Uriel Tal, "The Foundations of Political Messianism in
Israel" (Hebrew), Ha'aretz, 26 September 1984.
(13) Cited in ibid.
(14) Members of Gush Emunim argue that "what appears to be
confiscation of Arab-owned land for subsequent settlement by Jews is in
reality not an act of stealing but one of sanctification. From their
perspective the land is redeemed by being transferred from the satanic
to the divine sphere ... The Jewish fundamentalists believe that God
gave all of the Land of Israel to the Jews and that Arabs living in
Israel are viewed as thieves."
(15) Samuel C. Heilman, "Guides of the Faithful: Contemporary
Religious Zionist Rabbis," in Spokesmen for the Despised:
Fundamentalist Leaders of the Middle East, ed. Scott Appleby (Chicago:
1997), 354. Karen Armstrong, A Battle for God (New York: Random House,
2000), 353.
(16) Interview with Rabbi Ariel, 31 January 1985.
(17) Ehud Sprinzak, "Gush Emunim: The Iceberg Model of
Political Extremism" (Hebrew), Medina, Mimshal Veyahasim
Beinleumiim 17 (Spring 1981), 32.
(18) Tal, "Foundations of Political Messianism."
(19) Ian S. Lustick, For the I .and and the Lord: Jewish
Fundamentalism in Israel (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 1988),
75-76.
(20) See Giora Goldberg and Ephraim Ben Zadok, "Regionalism
and Territorial Cleavage in Formation: Jewish Settlement in the
Administered Territories" (Hebrew), Medina, Mimshal Veyahasim
Beinleumiim 21 (Spring 1983), 84-90.
(21) Sprinzak, "Gush Emunim: Iceberg Model," 41.
(22) Ehud Sprinzak, "Three Models of Religious Violence: The
Case of Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel," in Fundamentalism and the
State, ed. Martin E. Marty and R. Scott Appleby (Chicago and London:
1993), 480; Armstrong, Battle for God, 350.
(23) Especially the Prophets: Ezekiel 37-38, Daniel, and Zachariah
12-14
(24) Before Islam it was Communism that played this diabolic role.
(25) In Israel today there are a few thousand Jews who believe in
Jesus and resist definition as Christians, calling themselves
"Messianic Jews." They meet in over 90 congregations and
insist on their Jewish identity. Many of them are Christian Zionists and
some are hard-liners when it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
(26) www.kairospalestine.ps
Father Jamal Khader is an administrator and teacher at the Fatin
Theological Seminary in Beit Jala and at Bethlehem University.