The ecclesiology and ethics debate and the pilgrimage of justice and peace: an African perspective.
Phiri, Isabel Apawo
Lewis S Mudge stated, "The road to ecumenism lies through
attention to the locality one knows best. Global issues always have
their local manifestations. Local questions generally have their global
implications." (1)
Similarly, the origins of ecclesiology and ethics in ecumenical
debate can be found in a four-year study process initiated by the World
Council of Churches (WCC) from 1993 to 1996. South Africa has taken this
debate and made it its own by initiating a process to reflect on the
status of ecumenism in Africa, starting from 2001. From the Porto Alegre
WCC 9th Assembly, the language shifted from the ecclesiology and ethics
debate to moral discernment; and since the 10th Assembly in Busan, South
Korea, in 2013, the focus has been on the Pilgrimage of Justice and
Peace.
Drawing from the global ecclesiology and ethics debate, this essay
has a three-fold purpose: first, I attempt to search for the African
experience in the WCC's ecclesiology and ethics debate. Second, I
seek to establish how the ecclesiology and ethics debate and the
"Moral Discernment in the Churches" document are linked to the
WCC call to the Pilgrimage of Justice and Peace. Third, I will reflect
on visible participation of the Pilgrimage of Justice and Peace within
the African context. I will conclude by arguing that the principles
within the ecclesiology and ethics debate of "costly unity,"
"costly commitment," and "costly discipleship" are
also the principles of the Pilgrimage of Justice and Peace.
The Ecclesiology and Ethics Debate within the WCC
The WCC study processes on ecclesiology and ethics have been well
documented. (2) Visible unity of the churches meant that the churches
were to focus their discussions on the ecclesiological issues of
"Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry." The Faith and Order stream
of the WCC has been the driving force of the ecclesiological discussion.
At the same time, the Life and Work stream of the WCC focused on ethical
aspects of the church. In this way, the WCC was structured such that
faith and ethics were divided. This division found resonance at regional
ecumenical organizations and at national council of churches.
Nevertheless, as early as 1968, at the WCC Uppsala assembly, the
first general secretary of WCC, W. A. Visser't Hooft, did not agree
with the separation of faith and ethics, as he perceived them to be
woven together. While discussion of Visser't Hooft observations
went on at various levels within WCC circles, it was only in the 1990s
that a series of conferences and consultations took place between the
Faith and Order and Life and Work streams of the WCC, debating the link
between ecclesiology and ethics in the ecumenical movement. In this
contribution to the debate, I will only revisit these consultations in
the interest of highlighting the African presence in the participation
and content.
The first consultation was held at Ronde in Denmark in 1993 under
the theme of "Costly Unity." Out of the 25 international
delegates, five were from Africa: namely, Agnes Abuom from Kenya, Erica
Dolly Mphuthi from Lesotho, Neville Richardson from South Africa,
Veronica Swai from Tanzania, and Louise Tappa from Cameroon. I have not
been able to establish how the participation of the Africans affected
the conversations on costly unity in Africa. However, an analysis of the
content of the consultation shows that the African presence had a strong
impact in raising the issue of apartheid in South Africa. The purpose of
this consultation was to explore issues of koinonia in relation to
justice, peace and the integrity of creation. Duncan Forrester has
summarized it well:
It explored ways in which discipleship means costly involvement in
the pain, brokenness and struggles of the world and also
involvement in a koinonia which overcomes divisions and hostilities
many of which are ancient and deep seated. The Ronde consultation
in its report costly unity sought to point the way to a fresh
approach which offers new inspiration for the churches' search for
the unity, and for their costly, reconciling and healing witnessing
the world. (3)
Of special significance to our conversation is the suggestion that
"[m]oral issues and struggle often represent the line between
'cheap unity' and 'costly' unity. Cheap unity avoids
morally contested issues because they would disturb the unity of the
church. Costly unity is discovering the churches' unity as a gift
of pursuing justice and peace. It is often acquired at a price."
(4)
Choosing to get the root of costly unity was making a bold
declaration about what it means to be a disciple of Jesus Christ. An
example of costly unity that had an impact on the African continent was
when the WCC and other ecumenical partners declared that the issue of
apartheid was a matter of faith and the theological legitimation of
apartheid was a heresy. This declaration led to the WCC breaking
fellowship with the Dutch Reformed Church in South Africa over its
theological support for apartheid. Within the WCC itself, there was
opposition to the establishment of a Programme to Combat Racism because
it was perceived that the WCC was supporting terrorism. But drawing from
biblical imperatives, the ecumenical movement was determined to act
together against racism. The programme was established and some churches
withdrew their membership from the WCC.
It is this kind of resolve that is needed as the WCC leads the
ecumenical movement in the Pilgrimage of Justice and Peace. More
importantly, the ecumenical movement in Africa must identify for itself
those thorny issues of faith and ethics where they need to act together
even when they know it will be costly. This would be in line with the
Ronde report's declaration that the churches discovered "unity
[is] a gift of pursuing justice and peace," as noted in the
previous quotation. In this way, we do not have to separate unity from
the Pilgrimage of Justice and Peace, and we are willing to accept the
consequences of such unity.
The second consultation was held in Tantur, Israel/Palestine, in
1994 under the theme "Costly Commitment." Africa was
represented only by John de Gruchy out of the 21 international delegates
at this consultation. The purpose of this meeting was to build on the
findings of the first consultation by focusing on the relationship
between ecclesiology and ethics. This consultation is known for its
sense of special urgency to find answers to the relationship between
ecclesiology and ethics. There are two points of interest from the
Tantur that I want to raise.
First, the Tantur consultation realized the churches are not fully
aware of the costly commitment of costly unity. The Tantur report
states:
We believe that the churches have not yet grasped the full
implications of this decisive "ecumenical dimension." The churches
have not fully realised that a costly unity requires a costly
commitment to one another. We believe that the experience of the
churches in facing ethical issues together poses fundamental
ecclesiological questions, not only to the ecumenical movement but
to the churches themselves. (5)
Today it still remains to be analyzed whether the churches in
Africa who belong to the ecumenical movement have fully understood the
concepts of costly unity requiring costly commitment, and that facing
ethical issues together has an impact on their self-understanding as
church. Would the churches in Africa today really agree that if they are
not engaging in ethical issues together, then none of them individually
is being fully church? (6) If such a conversation is not happening among
the churches, where would that awakening moment take place?
A second point of interest to the churches in Africa that came from
the Tantur consultation was its focus on "ecclesial renewal amongst
those who have been more deeply engaged in ethical praxis." (7) One
example given was that of South Africa. It was observed that since the
churches in South Africa had successfully accompanied society and the
government in ensuring democracy for everyone in South Africa, it was
now time to turn to matters of unity within the churches across racial
lines. While the process of unity among some denominations in South
Africa is ongoing and has its own challenges, Mary Anne Plaatjies van
Huffel has shown that the Dutch Reformed Church (DRC) is yet to reunite
with the Uniting Reformed Church in Southern Africa (URCSA). (8) She
writes,
In 2015 the general synod failed to get two thirds majority vote
needed to adopt the Belhair confession. This means that unification
with its three sister churches, which is based on the condition
that the DRC adopt the Belhair confession, has continued to be put
on hold. However, room has been opened for the adoption of the
Belhair confession at synod level and for unification to take place
at provincial level. While this is happening in the Western Cape
Province between the coloured and white churches, that has not been
in the case in the Northern Province between the white and black
churches. The four sister churches have also agreed to have a
common Order of Service, which they are working on with the help of
the Protestant Churches in the Netherlands. (9)
The third consultation took place in Johannesburg, South Africa, in
1996 under the theme "Costly Obedience." It had a strong South
African presence, represented by John de Gruchy, Mongezi Guma, and Frans
Noko Kekane out of the 11 delegates. Its venue also influenced the
detailed discussion of the South African transition to an inclusive
democracy and the challenges of economic empowerment of the masses,
which struggled and still continue to struggle with high levels of
unemployment and links to continued violence. The consultation
acknowledged the great work done by the churches in the past and the
great challenge to the South African Council of Churches (SACC) for its
role in maintaining a critical solidarity with the government while
maintaining its prophetic voice. The position taken by SACC is still a
subject for discussion.
The third consultation also wrestled with questions of what it
means for the ecumenical movement to be a moral community. The statement
of the consultation that was directed to the context of South Africa
noted,
If the church is to fulfil its calling to be a sign of God's reign
in such a situation, it is imperative that it begin to understand
itself as the ecumenical moral community. Hence the importance of
the theme of moral formation. The church needs to ask how--with all
its theological, liturgical and sacramental resources, it can be a
community of relevant moral witness for such a world. (10)
The church in South Africa, and I argue in Africa, was being
challenged here to consider itself as a moral community. As such, the
ecumenical moral community in Africa has to pay special attention to
moral issues of today within the churches and in the world. This has to
go hand-in-hand with moral formation in the churches and in the
theological institutions.
In summary, at the three consultations--Ronde in 1993, the Tantur
in 1994, and Johannesburg in 1996--Africa was well represented and the
issues discussed were of significance to the ecumenical movement in
Africa. There are two major lessons for Africa to learn from the three
consultations. First, we need to know how to ask moral questions that
are relevant to our context and seek to find answers together in the
churches and in the institutions where church formation takes place.
This is well articulated by Mudge, who stated, "the WCC's
starting point in this conversation on ecclesiology and ethics is that
'asking moral questions well begins when we learn to be the church
well. And being church well means becoming a formational community whose
practices--liturgical and moral alike--arise from and are made possible
by the gospel message.'" (11) This means that the church in
Africa should not dismiss current moral debates as un-African, but
rather grapple with them with new eyes as they present themselves to the
members of our churches and the African society and seek answers
together. It is the willingness to work together that is important.
Second, African churches are to learn from the connectedness of costly
unity, costly commitment, and costly obedience as the essence of what it
means to live the gospel message. If all three are embraced, then gender
and human sexuality issues should not threaten the unity of the church,
because we will be committed to each other and to the gospel. This
raises the issue of how to discern together on moral issues.
From the Ecclesiology and Ethics Debate to Moral Discernment
The three consultations discussed above are important in the
ecclesiology and ethics debate because they identified the need for
thorough analysis of the process of moral formation and discernment.
(12) This recommendation was taken up in a study process by Faith and
Order from WCC's 9th Assembly in Porto Alegre in 2006 to the 10th
Assembly in 2013. The difficulty of the ecclesiology and ethics debate
is seen clearly in the "Moral Discernment in the Churches"
study document addendum from the Orthodox participants of the Faith and
Order Standing Commission and in a footnote in the document from the
Roman Catholics stating that they did not fully agree with the method
followed on moral discernment. Such comments point to the challenges of
speaking with one voice on ethical issues that could threaten both
progress in the study process and the unity of the churches working in
co-operation with the WCC. Notwithstanding their comments, the study
document started by stating that "one of the major challenges in
the 21st century is the division that exists between churches--over
moral issues, divisions that threaten the aim of Faith and Order for
visible unity in one faith and one Eucharistic fellowship." (13)
Considering the struggles that the churches in Africa are going through
on issues of moral discernment, this is one document that should be
studied in the various churches, ecumenical bodies, and theological
institutions in Africa.
The significance of the ecclesiological and ethics debate was also
felt at the WCC's 10th Assembly in 2013. The issues of gender and
human sexuality were again brought to the fore. As reflected in the
report of the Programme Guidelines Committee:
Being aware of divisive issues among churches, the WCC can function
as a safe space to enter into dialogue and moral discernment on
matters which the churches find challenging. Examples which have
been heard strongly in this assembly include questions of gender
and human sexuality. Controversial issues have their place within
that safe space on the common agenda, remembering that tolerance is
not enough, but the baseline is love and mutual respect. (14)
The WCC has followed up this recommendation by creating a safe
space for the ecumenical movement to debate on issues of gender and
human sexuality. A reference group on human sexuality has been created
with a specific mandate to advise the WCC general secretary on how to
deal with issues of human sexuality. (15) A Gender Adversary Group has
also been created. Africa is well represented in both the reference
group on human sexuality and Gender Advisory Group through its
leadership team and WCC staff team on human sexuality. The significance
of having a reference group on human sexuality and the Gender Advisory
Group is that gender and human sexuality are some of the issues for
conversation on the Pilgrimage of Justice and Peace. It remains to be
seen how the pilgrimage--whose foundation is on the oneness of the body
of Christ in cooperation with people of good will as we work for
healing, reconciliation and love of God in a broken and hurting
world--will build from lessons drawn from the study processes on
ecclesiology and ethics (Costly Unity, Costly Commitment and Costly
Discipleship) and on the "Moral Discernment in the Churches"
study document.
The Pilgrimage of Justice and Peace
The foundation of the Pilgrimage of Justice and Peace are in the
WCC's (16) first assembly in Amsterdam, the Netherlands in 1948,
where the churches were called to "stay together" so that they
can witness together despite the political turmoil of the time.
Sixty-five years later, at the 10th Assembly of the WCC held in Busan,
the Republic of Korea, a call was issued to the churches, the ecumenical
movement, and people of good will to embark on a Pilgrimage of Justice
and Peace. This call was about "moving together," indicating a
shift from the first call of 1948. This is well explained in the
assembly message, which stated that, while the 1st WCC assembly in
Amsterdam in 1948 was, "We intend to stay together for the 10th
Assembly in 2013 the focus is on "We intend to move together"
(17) in a Pilgrimage of Justice and Peace. The difference is that the
initial call emphasized the churches maintaining unity in a divided
world, while the second call builds on the first call to emphasize
movement and spirituality. The focus on peace and justice itself has
remained constant throughout the work of WCC.
An increasing number of attempts have been made to describe what
the Pilgrimage of Justice and Peace implies. This has been deliberately
left open so that it becomes part of the actual reflection of what it
is, where it is going, and what it is doing. It is a journey in which
all those who are participating in it from the WCC fellowship and the
ecumenical movement engage in prayer, witness, and service for justice
and peace. As they stay and move as a united group, they discover
together anew the perfect will of God for the hurting world and commit
themselves afresh to act together to bring God's healing and
reconciliation.
The WCC strategic plans 2014-2017 document explains that the
Pilgrimage of Justice and Peace has now become the framework in which
all its work is done. Furthermore, it shows the link between church
unity and the pilgrimage:
The call for an ecumenical pilgrimage is firmly rooted in the
conviction that unity among churches is a response to the love of the
Triune God for this world, as affirmed by the assembly: "The unity
of the Church, the unity of the human community and the unity of the
whole creation are interconnected. Christ who makes us one calls us to
live in justice and peace and impels us to work together for justice and
peace in God's world." (10th WCC Assembly Unity Statement,
par. 13)
The pilgrimage of justice and peace as a concrete expression of the
visible unity among churches has therefore clear goals:
* to live in justice and peace; and
* to work together for justice and peace in God's world.
Churches and ecumenical partners are invited to commit themselves
to these goals, to live and work together for justice and peace in
God's world. Journeying together, they try to understand where God
is yearning and working for justice and peace in this world. Confessing
faith in God's mission (mission Dei), churches and ecumenical
partners engage themselves in transforming witness and action. (18)
What has not been articulated yet is the issue of costly unity,
costly commitment, and costly obedience for the Pilgrimage of Justice
and Peace. However, the fact that the issues of gender and human
sexuality were identified as significant for the fellowship of the WCC
between 2014 to 2021 at the same time as the pilgrimage is a clear
signal that costly unity, costly commitment, and costly obedience will
become key for the pilgrimage of justice and peace.
The emphasis of unity of the churches and acting together in the
pilgrimage brings ecclesiology and ethics together. Indeed, this has
been the emphasis of the current general secretary of WCC, Rev. Dr Olav
Fykse Tveit, namely that the WCC work in Public Witness and Diakonia
must be grounded in theological reflection while the work of Unity and
Mission must intersect with justice and peace. Hence the decision to
regard the Pilgrimage of Justice and Peace as the framework in which
Unity, Mission, Church Relation, Public Witness and Ecumenical Formation
is done in the council.
The line of continuity between the Pilgrimage of Justice and Peace
and the previous work of the WCC is seen in the embrace of important
background documents such as "The Church--Towards a Common
Vision"; "Mission towards Life"; "Economy of
Life"; and "A Call to Just Peace and the Unity
Statement." The reason why the ecclesiology and ethics documents on
costly unity, costly commitment, and costly discipleship are not
included to shape the pilgrimage is that they were not adopted as
assembly documents at the Harare assembly in 1998. However, that does
not prevent us from now drawing from them to shape the Pilgrimage of
Justice and Peace when the issues they raised are still relevant in
dealing with contested issues as we walk together.
While the ecclesiology and ethics debate centred on relationships
within the ecumenical movement, the call to the Pilgrimage of Justice
and Peace is extended to people of good will. These are partners from
other faiths and civil societies, governments, and UN agencies concerned
about peace and justice. What Christians have in common with people of
other faiths is that their basis for getting involved in ethical
dimension of justice and peace is grounded in their faith. With civil
society and other international agencies and governments, there has been
an awakening in recognizing that faith organizations can work with them
for justice and peace. Walking together in this case requires building
trust and understanding that together we can deal with ethical issues
that undermine the dignity of humanity and creation.
The Pilgrimage of Justice and Peace in the African Context
First, when reflecting on the concept of a pilgrimage in Africa,
our starting point is to draw from our African spirituality. The
traditional African context, south of the Sahara desert, understands the
concept of a pilgrimage as a journey of faith visiting a holy place for
purposes of meeting with God on issues that show the interconnectedness
of humanity, the spirit world, and the environment. (19) Elsewhere, in
my implicit engagement with the concept of pilgrimage in the Chewa
traditional religion of Malawi, I also demonstrated that the current
visits to the shrine of Chisumphi are practised by women and men coming
from different Christian traditions who are drawn to act together, bound
by their cultural practices that have relevance for their interpretation
of creation. Although the language of ecumenism is not used in this
context, it is intentionally practised to maintain the traditional
harmonizing of people's lives, their animals, the environment, and
their spirituality. A pilgrimage is made to the Chisumphi shrine before
planting for the blessings of the seeds and at harvest time for
thanksgiving for the first fruits. The people of different denominations
of the Chisumphi area walk together for the purpose of protecting life
as understood within the traditional spirituality.
Second, within African Christianity, the mission churches have not
developed a tradition of going on a pilgrimage, as is the case in Europe
where there is an awakening of visiting their spiritual heritage
locations. Nigeria, Kenya, and South Africa are the few countries where
Christians go on a pilgrimage to the Holy Land in Israel/Palestine on a
regular basis. Such pilgrimages to the Holy Land do not link
spirituality with issues of justice and peace within the context of
Israel/Palestine. One exception is represented by the South Africans who
join the WCC-Ecumenical Accompaniment Programme on Palestine-Israel, who
are exposed to issues of injustice happening in the Holy Land. South
Africa has had 92 Ecumenical Accompaniers (EAs) participate in providing
protective presence at check points in Israel/Palestine. The issue now
is following up on how the 92 EAs are using their experiences to do
advocacy in the churches and with the politicians in South Africa. The
classical African indigenous churches that go on annual pilgrimages--for
example, to Mount Moriah in South Africa--do not connect their
pilgrimage with issues of justice and peace, nor are they done in the
context of ecumenism. The closest ecumenical pilgrimage is the one
organized by the Dikonia Centres of the Regional Council of Churches in
South Africa during Easter celebrations.
Whatever the context, the key element to the pilgrimage is that it
is spiritual as opposed to the previous language of decade. It therefore
involves identifying the gifts that God has already given the churches
in Africa in order to embark on this pilgrimage. Notwithstanding these
challenges, (20) Africa is known for its vibrant, predominantly
charismatic spirituality with high levels of youth participation. It
draws from the concept of family or community in its self-understanding
of being church. In this way, when disaster strikes, the local church is
always the first to respond to restore human dignity with their local
resources. They are also the last to leave when the international
humanitarian bodies have moved on to respond to new emerging crises. It
is these gifts of being church together in times of crisis that are
important for the Pilgrimage of Justice and Peace in Africa.
Third, the Pilgrimage of Justice and Peace demands an analysis of
particular contexts in order to identify areas of local
brokenness--where God's people and creation are hurting and where
the local churches feel Jesus Christ is calling them to respond. At the
same time, it brings the local churches into contact with global issues
of brokenness. The WCC invitation document states,
this pilgrimage will lead us to the locations of ugly violence and
injustices. We intend to look for God's incarnated presence in the
midst of suffering, exclusion, and discrimination. The true
encounter with real, contextual experiences of a broken creation
and sinful behaviour against each other might inform us anew about
the essence of life itself. It might lead us to repentance and--in
a movement of purification--liberate us from obsession with power,
possessions, ego, and violence, so that we become ever more
Christ-like. (21)
Within Africa, the WCC has chosen to highlight South Sudan, the
Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), and Nigeria (22) as priority
countries. At the same time, the WCC has come to the realization that
one cannot solve the problems of DRC without touching the neighbouring
countries, because the issues that are destroying human and ecological
dignity cut across many other African countries. In terms of themes, the
WCC is focusing on peacebuilding, economic justice, climate change, and
human dignity. The WCC has also become aware of dealing with
cross-cutting issues. For example, inter-religious dialogue and
cooperation is key in peacebuilding in Nigeria and in dealing with the
religious extremism manifest in the form of the presence of ISIS in
Egypt and Libya, Boko Haram in Nigeria, and Al-Shabab in Kenya and
Somalia. The migration of large numbers of Africans to Europe is another
theme that requires a multifaceted approach on the Pilgrimage of Justice
and Peace.
Each year the Pilgrimage of Justice and Peace will focus on a
particular region and theme. For 2015 the focus is on climate change.
Churches are gathering in different stations to reflect and pray
together as they move on a pilgrimage of climate justice to the UN
Conference of Parties (COP21), which will take place in the Le Bourget
area of Paris on 7-8 December 2015. Africa is participating in the
pilgrimage of climate justice through the launch of the Pan Africa
Cycling Caravan for Climate Justice. "Cyclists are setting off on a
6500 km journey from Maputo to raise the voices of people at the
forefront of a changing climate. The caravan will go through South
Africa, Botswana, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Malawi, Uganda, and Tanzania to
Kenya." (23) Along the way they will collect one million signatures
and plant one million trees. In 2016, the Pilgrimage of Justice and
Peace will focus on The Middle East, particularly on just peace in
Israel/ Palestine. In 2017, the focus will be on the African continent.
It will respond to the African Union's Agenda 2063: "The
Africa We Want." (24) The All Africa Council of Churches is taking
the lead in the theological reflection on the Agenda 2063.
Fourth, the pilgrimage is transformational. The call here is to
bring healing, reconciliation, and peace with justice to the brokenness
identified through social analysis. The WCC document describes the
pilgrimage as transformational as follows:
Being transformed ourselves, the pilgrimage may lead us to concrete
actions of transformation. We may grow in our courage to live in
true compassion with one another and with nature. This will include
the strength to resist evil--injustice and violence, even if a
church finds itself in a minority situation. Economic and
ecological justice as well as the healing of the wounded and the
striving for peaceful reconciliation is our call--in each and every
context. The credibility of our actions might grow WCC Central
Committee--from the quality of the fellowship we share--a
fellowship of justice and peace.--We are transformed through prayer
and act in prayer. (25)
The transformational agenda of the Pilgrimage of Justice and Peace
resonates well with the language of costly unity, costly commitment, and
costly discipleship. It gives room for theological institutions in
Africa to create safe spaces where comprehensive engagement with gender
and human sexuality can be done.
Conclusion
The ecclesiology and ethics debate has a contribution to make to
the call of the WCC to walk together on a Pilgrimage of Justice and
Peace. The call is an opportunity for the churches, ecumenical partners,
and people of good will to walk together in discussions and action
because we have a common vision of a better world, one in which each
human being is treated with dignity and God's creation is
protected. It is an ecumenical journey where not all the answers are
already figured out but are discovered through discourse and action for
transformation. The journey is to where God is. On this journey, there
is need to draw from what has been done in the past in the area of
ecclesiology and ethics. The principles of costly unity, costly
commitment, and costly discipleship are the principles of the Pilgrimage
of Justice and Peace. Similarly, notwithstanding the controversies over
"The Moral Discernment of the Churches" document, it is a
further development of the ecclesiology and ethics debate and is
significant for the pilgrimage, as it provides the method for dealing
with contested issues as the churches walk together toward justice and
peace.
DOI: 10.1111/erev.12195
(1) Lewis S. Mudge, The Church as Moral Community: Ecclesiology and
Ethics in Ecumenical Debates (Geneva: WCC Publications, 1998), 12.
(2) See the following works: Church and World: The Unity of the
Church and the Renewal of Human Community, Faith and Order Paper No. 151
(Geneva: WCC Publications, 1990); Thomas F. Best and Wesley
Gransberg-Michaelson, eds., Costly Unity Koinonia and Justice, Peace and
Creation, WCC Faith and Order/Unit I and III (Geneva: WCC Publications,
1993); Thomas F. Best and Martin Robra, eds., Costly Commitment:
Ecclesiology and Ethics, WCC Faith and Order/Unit I and III (Geneva: WCC
Publications, 1995); "The Ecumenical Dialogue on Moral Issues: the
Potential Sources of Common Witness or of Divisions," JWG Document,
Ecumenical Review 48 (1996); Thomas F. Best and Martin Robra, eds.,
Ecclesiology and Ethics: Ecumenical Ethical Engagement, Moral Formation
and the Nature of the Church (Geneva: WCC Publications, 1997); Duncan
Forrester, The True Church and Morality: Reflections on Ecclesiology and
Ethics (Geneva: WCC Publications, 1997); Mudge, Church as Moral
Community; Duncan Forrester, "Ecclesiology and Ethics," in The
Dictionary of Ecumenical Movement, 2nd ed., ed. Nicholas Lossky, Jose
Miguez Bonino, John Pobee, Tom F. Stransky, Geoffrey Wainwright, and
Pauline Webb (Geneva: WCC Publications, 2002), 348-49; and Moral
Discernment in the Churches: A Study Document, Faith and Order Paper No.
215 (Geneva: WCC Publications, 2013).
(3) Forrester, "Ecclesiology and Ethics," 347.
(4) Best and Robra, Ecclesiology and Ethics, 6.
(5) Ibid., 28.
(6) Ibid., 29.
(7) Ibid., 27.
(8) Mary Anne Plaatjies van Huffel, "The Uniting Reformed
Church in Southern Africa's Enactment on Church Judicial and Legal
Issues," Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif SA (July
2013), 101-13, at 102.
(9) Conversation with Prof. Rev. Dr Mary Anne Plaatjies van Huffel
on Friday, 16 October 2015 at Stellenbosch.
(10) Best and Robra, Ecclesiology and Ethics, 52.
(11) Mudge, Church as Moral Community, 9.
(12) Best and Robra, Ecclesiology and Ethics, 48.
(13) Moral Discernment in the Churches, 1.
(14) WCC 10th Assembly, "Report of the Programme Guidelines
Committee," Doc. No. PGC 01, 5.
(15) The full terms of reference for this group includes the
following: to give advice on the development and content of the WCC work
related to human sexuality for the period of 2014-2017; to bring
coherence to the work of the member churches on human sexuality with WCC
programmatic work that relates to human sexuality; to review the
previous work and documents of the WCC on Human Sexuality; to give
advice on how the churches can engage each other in conversations on
human sexuality; to accompany the WCC's human sexuality staff group
in carrying out the recommendations of WCC governing bodies and to offer
advice on further development of the work; to analyse the religious,
cultural, legal, medical, political, and social consequences of
government legislations on human sexuality, starting with specific case
studies; to identify resources and developments from the churches and
the civil society that are helpful in fostering conversations on human
sexuality; to prepare reports on its work and process to the central
committee meetings through the general secretary. See also the
background document on Terms of Reference to see how the WCC has dealt
with the issue of human sexuality in the New Delhi WCC assembly in 1961
to the Busan assembly in 2013.
(16) According to the constitution of the WCC, article 3, the
WCC's self-understanding is that it is a fellowship of 345 churches
representing over 500 million Christians in 120 countries "to call
one another to visible unity ... witness and service to the world and to
advance towards that unity in order that the world may believe."
Official Report of the 10th Assembly of the WCC, 425.
(17) Ibid.
(18) WCC Strategic Plan 2014-2017, approved by the WCC central
committee, July 2014.
(19) See Isabel Apawo Phiri, "African Traditional Religion and
Eco-feminism: The Role of Women at Chisumphi Shrine in Preserving
Ecology," in Women Healing Earth, ed. Rosemary Radford Reuther
(Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis, 1996), 161-71.
(20) Challenges that Africa need to acknowledge and find solutions
may include the many of the Pentecostal and charismatic churches that
are not affiliated with the ecumenical organizations and tend to oppose
the agenda of ecumenism because of conservative interpretations of
scripture on ethical issues that are central in the pilgrimage of
justice and peace.
(21) WCC Central Committee, "An Invitation to the Pilgrimage
of Justice and Peace," Doc. No. GEN 05, 3.
(22) The other priority countries of the WCC between 2014 and 2017
are the Korean Peninsula, Israel/Palestine, and Syria/Iraq.
(23) "We Have Faith--ACT Now for Climate Justice" is a
joint initiative of ACT Alliance, We Have Faith, PACJA, and the National
Council of Churches of Kenya. Email sent by Vitumbiko Chinoko, 25 August
2015, www.actclimate.org.
(24) Agenda 2063, The Africa We Want, 2nd ed., African Union
website, August 2013, at: http://agenda2063.au.int/
en/sites/default/files/agenda2063_popular_version_05092014_EN.pdf.
(25) "An Invitation to the Pilgrimage of Justice and
Peace" (revised), Doc. No. GEN 05, 4.
Isabel Apawo Phiri
Isabel Apam Phiri is Associate General Secretary for Public Witness
and Diakonia, the World Council of Churches, and honourary professor for
Theology at the University of KwaZulu Natal, South Africa.