W. Bole, D. Christiansen, R.T. Hennemeyer, Forgiveness in International Politics ... an Alternative Road to Peace.
Kerber, Guillermo
W. Bole, D. Christiansen, R.T. Hennemeyer, Forgiveness in
International Politics ... an Alternative Road to Peace, Washington DC,
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, 2004, 208pp., US $19.95.
Is forgiveness a realistic possibility in today's
international political context? What are the conditions for social and
political forgiveness? Have there been any concrete experiences of
forgiveness in international politics? These are some of the questions
this book tries to answer. The book will provide a relevant insight to
all those interested in deepening on the possibilities of forgiveness at
international politics.
Bole, Christiansen and Hennemeyer wrote this book as a result of a
series of colloquia held at the Woodstock Theological Centre, Georgetown
University, Washington DC, USA, and a working group which continued the
reflection for seven years. The book aims at gleaning lessons relating
to forgiveness from and for the field of conflict-resolution and
peace-building.
The authors' reflections are based on philosophical,
theological and political considerations as well as on lessons learned
from concrete situations, for example South Africa, the Balkans and
Northern Ireland. While stressing the importance of forgiveness, the
authors pay special attention to other aspects such as truth-telling,
justice, the healing of memories and victims' rights.
Forgiveness is seen and developed as a process and not as an event.
One of the main purposes of the book is to install the discussion on
forgiveness in the international arena and to recall the religious
commitment to forgiveness.
The authors analyze the implications of forgiveness by trying to
address the two-track theory of international conflict resolution: track
I being the realm of nation-state negotiations and the interactions of
official diplomats and track II the terrain of civil society, mediating
institutions and non-governmental organizations. Track II is where
forgiveness makes its entrance as a political possibility, but the
authors make a strong call to include forgiveness also in track I. In
this perspective, forgiveness should be seen as part of a larger notion
of security that includes the building of trust and relationships across
dangerously divisive political lines.
After having stated the causes of unforgiveness, among them cycles
of revenge, distorted memories, victimhood and institutional breakdown
(chapter 1), the authors try to respond why forgiveness has become a
strategic value in conflict-resolution by theorists and practitioners
(chapter 2). Chapter 3 unfolds a definition of forgiveness in politics
proposed by Donald Shriver in his book An Ethic for Enemies: Forgiveness
in Politics. Shriver stated that forgiveness joins moral truth,
forbearance from revenge, empathy and commitment to repair a fractured
human relationship. The authors develop each of these aspects of
forgiveness in politics. Concrete manifestations of political
forgiveness such as truth commissions and "facilitated small
groups" are analyzed in chapter 4, mainly bringing in the
experiences of South Africa, Chile and the Balkans. The following
chapters relate forgiveness, religion and politics. Chapter 6 develops
the challenges to religious communities in building a new space for
forgiveness in the political arena. The role of faith-based NGOs in
helping to mine the peace-building assets of organized religions is
analyzed in chapter 7 while the last chapter focuses on some basic
affirmations regarding religion and culture addressing peace-builders
and policy-makers.
A conclusion highlights lessons learned through the different
chapters of the book. These include the importance of a serious effort
to establish historical truth and to disseminate it widely in society;
the relevance of memory, especially in ethnic and other clashes of group
identity; the difference between political forgiveness and general
amnesty; the freedom of victims to forgive; the affirmation that
forgiveness may include punishment for the sake of the society rejecting
a notion of justice as reduced simply to punishment; the caution against
an instantaneous forgiveness which may be too quick or superficial; the
role of third-party facilitators; the conditions for atmospheres or
cultures of forgiveness at the societal and interpersonal levels; the
constructive role religious communities can play even when they are
co-opted and corrupted.
An appendix on "some organizational resources" is also
included, where twenty institutions working on forgiveness are
introduced. Though the sample does not pretend to be complete, it only
refers to organizations from some English speaking countries, with 17
coming from the United States and only three from outside the US.
The book builds upon the changing nature of conflicts in the post
cold-war period but as it is acknowledged in the introduction, there is
hardly any reference to the impact of the 11 September 2001 attacks in
the US and its aftermath "war on terror" on issues such as
forgiveness and reconciliation. In the book, the relationship between
these two concepts, forgiveness and reconciliation, is presented in the
following way: forgiveness is seen as a process, a set of inter-related
conditions and components towards reconciliation. Taking into account
other theories on reconciliation, which have been developed without a
specific mention of forgiveness as a condition, much more reflection is
needed to deepen the interdependence between these two notions, taking
into account, as the authors state, that forgiveness is a radical new
factor in international politics.
Guillermo Kerber is programme executive for Impunity, Justice and
Reconciliation in the International Affairs, Peace and Human Security
team of the World Council of Churches.