首页    期刊浏览 2025年08月26日 星期二
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Editorial. (The quarterly of the World Council of Churches).
  • 作者:Best, Thomas F.
  • 期刊名称:The Ecumenical Review
  • 印刷版ISSN:0013-0796
  • 出版年度:2002
  • 期号:January
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:World Council of Churches
  • 摘要:But, as characters in novels sometimes do (revealingly, to good authors more often than to bad), the subject matter refused to fit into the mould foreseen for them. Worship, baptism, ecclesiology, recognition: these all proved to be so interwoven in their presuppositions, content and implications that the double issue you now hold in your hands imposed itself upon us as the best way to present this material in its coherence and interaction. While these are matters of general ecumenical interest, we hope particularly to help the WCC Orthodox Special Commission in its reflections on WCC-Orthodox relations and on what I have called, in another context, "possible futures" (1) for the ecumenical movement.

Editorial. (The quarterly of the World Council of Churches).


Best, Thomas F.


This double issue of The Ecumenical Review is not for the faint of heart: it deals, in short, with several of the most fraught theological and ecclesiological questions facing the churches today. It started with the usual planning for two separate issues: one for January 2002, to deal with the question of worship in ecumenical contexts, and one for April 2002, to tackle questions of baptism and ecclesiology, especially the meaning, and practical implications, of the churches' "mutual recognition" of baptism.

But, as characters in novels sometimes do (revealingly, to good authors more often than to bad), the subject matter refused to fit into the mould foreseen for them. Worship, baptism, ecclesiology, recognition: these all proved to be so interwoven in their presuppositions, content and implications that the double issue you now hold in your hands imposed itself upon us as the best way to present this material in its coherence and interaction. While these are matters of general ecumenical interest, we hope particularly to help the WCC Orthodox Special Commission in its reflections on WCC-Orthodox relations and on what I have called, in another context, "possible futures" (1) for the ecumenical movement.

We begin with a review of one of the central dilemmas forced upon the churches by their ecumenical experience: whatever differences still divide us, we want, and need, to worship together; but precisely because in worship the churches expose their deepest convictions--their ecclesial soul, if you will --we can there hurt each other most deeply. Several essays explore the possibilities, and limits, of worship in ecumenical contexts. These include searching explorations of "ecumenical worship" and presentations, as charitable as clear, of the difficulties felt by some churches in this area.

We turn then to baptism, the ritual act of entry into the body of Christ, asking about its significance for the churches' relations one with another, and about the theological and pastoral issues faced by those who move from one part of Christ's body to another. On the way we find an important contribution to the current ecumenical discussion of the event of baptism as a crucial moment within a process of life-long growth into Christ, as well as careful reflections on the notion of oikonomia as a help towards wider mutual recognition of our common baptism in Christ. Two sermons explore aspects of entering through baptism, and belonging to, the body of Christ. These articles do not shirk the difficult issues involved; but even the most critical affirm the crucial importance of baptismal recognition for the ecumenical movement, and for the churches themselves.

Moderator of the WCC central committee Aram I contributes a prophetic exploration of the situation of his own church today, clarifying what is at stake in the encounter of tradition and the "modern" world. Following this, the contemporary engagement with the fathers of the church--a fundamental issue for all churches, whether Orthodox, Protestant or Roman Catholic--is explored. An internal, first-hand explanation is given of the recent "Social Doctrine" document of the Russian Orthodox Church, together with an informed and sensitive commentary from Protestant theologians. We believe that, in various ways, these articles break new ground and hope they will encourage a wider and frank dialogue among the churches.

Additional articles explore (not to say challenge) the churches' commitment to unity, deepening significantly the classic discussion of "models" of unity. A Roman Catholic voice explores the philosophical bases of our search for Christian unity, and we hear a strong call for the Christian World Communions to assume a clearer role within the ecumenical movement. Finally, we offer a detailed review of the churches' role in the momentous religious and political transitions in Western and Eastern Germany before, and following, the fall of the Berlin Wall.

Differences, sometimes profound, remain in all these areas. Perhaps most notoriously: all Christians are still not able to gather together at the Lord's table. To aid this discussion we have reprinted in the "Ecumenical Chronicle" section the current WCC guidelines for eucharistic services at ecumenical meetings, as well as the statement from an Orthodox-Roman Catholic dialogue in North America (especially significant in view of certain tensions today) reflecting the commitment to the baptismal reality which unites Christians within the one body of Christ.

We regret that it has not been possible, for practical reasons, to include the customary sections on "Books Received" and on "Significant Ecumenical Journals" and "Bibliographia Oecumenica". We hope to restore these important resources in subsequent editions of The Ecumenical Review.

But let us close with a further reflection on baptism. Of course the churches continue in some cases to differ, and sometimes sharply, in their understanding and practice of baptism. But do we not sense that, finally, baptism belongs not to the churches but to Christ? Does not baptism mean, finally, our being claimed by Christ and brought, through his grace, into his one body? And is that not the reality behind the churches' mutual recognition of baptism--however "real, but imperfect" it may be: the fact that we recognize the priority of Christ's claim over all competing claims of ecclesial history and tradition? Do we not sense that to deny another's baptism is, finally, to deny not another church but Christ himself?

NOTE

(1) Thomas F. Best, "The Issues Beyond the Issues: Possible Futures for the Faith and Order World Conference", The Ecumenical Review, vol. 45, no. 1, Jan. 1993, pp.55-65.
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有