Survey of church union negotiations 1999-2002.
Best, Thomas F.
Introduction
This latest edition of the church union survey, (1) coming on the
eve of the next, seventh international consultation of united and
uniting churches, details many of the developments within the united and
uniting churches family since the previous survey was published in
January 2000. As readers know--or will learn in these pages--church
unions are significant both ecclesiologically and socially. They require
not only the commitment to resolve difficult, divisive issues of faith
and order; but also the reconciliation of deep-seated, sometimes even
violent historical, racial and cultural divisions. In addition there are
often complex and emotionally charged issues to be resolved about church
properties, pension funds, and other "practical" matters,
which have a surprising tendency to become bearers of traditional values and cherished commitments.
The current spectrum of church union negotiations, as reflected in
the pages which follow, includes lively examples of all these challenges
and more. Just as the united churches are the most widely diverse family
of churches, so is the current set of union discussions distinguished by
its variety creativity. Here are examples of that classic form of church
union, the structural integration of divided churches to form a new
ecclesial body; but also partnerships, with the churches seeking the
greatest possible degree of common life, witness and service while
remaining institutionally separate; common parishes, living out unity at
the local level (and understanding that, to varying degrees, as a
challenge to their still-divided constituent denominations); proposals
for an "ecumenical bishop", to explore the potential of an
oversight exercised personally, yet on behalf of several churches rather
than one; and yet more besides.
Each of these is the response, in a given church and cultural
situation, to Christ's call to the churches to be visibly one. The
interaction among these diverse understandings of what unity means
today, and how it is best pursued "in each place," is
precisely what makes the church union scene so dynamic today, and such a
point of growth ecumenically.
A moment for taking stock, and moving ahead
As noted above, this survey looks towards the seventh international
consultation of united and uniting churches, to be held in Driebergen,
Netherlands, in September 2002 on the theme "`With a Demonstration
of the Spirit and of Power' (1 Cor. 2:4): The Life and Mission of
the United and Uniting Churches". The meeting will be hosted by the
Uniting Protestant Churches in the Netherlands (the "Samen op
Weg" church union process), with generous support from the Council
for World Mission, and with Faith and Order (WCC) playing a coordinating
role. It stands in the tradition of meetings at Bossey, 1967; (2)
Limuru, 1970; (3) Toronto, 1975; (4) Colombo, 1981; (5) Potsdam, 1987;
(6) and Ocho Rios, 1995, (7) each of which has proved to be a
significant moment in the exploration of the meaning and forms of church
union.
This seventh consultation aims at clarifying and strengthening the
united and uniting churches' self-understanding, and their
commitment to mission within the context of their search for unity; at
strengthening the bonds of fellowship amongst these churches, and
clarifying their relationships with one another, with partner churches
overseas, and with Christian world communions; and at encountering the
local church union process "Samen op Weg", in order to learn
from, and encourage, its work. The consultations aims, further, to
produce substantial yet concise texts--"letters" or
"messages"--addressed to three distinct, but inter-related
constituencies: to the united and uniting churches themselves; to
mission commissions, agencies and networks; and to the Christian world
communions.
Consultation with the united and uniting churches has identified
three focal issues, to be explored in plenary presentations and
complementary case studies. These are unity (the diverse--and
developing--understandings of unity among the churches today, and what
organizational forms best serve the unity of Christ's church);
mission (whether--as is often said before union--union actually enhances
mission, and how united churches can strengthen their mission today);
and identity (how the churches' self-understanding is shaped by
their experience of union and in mission, and by their relation to other
churches and with world communions). In addition, workshops will treat a
range of issues from the possible role of bishops within united
churches, to church property, to relations with other churches; and
informative sessions will trace the prospects for church union in the
Netherlands and elsewhere. The whole will be undergirded by worship and
integrated Bible study on texts from 1 Corinthians 1-3.
Making choices
The consultation hopes finally to provide resources for the united
and uniting churches as they look ahead. Today these churches find
themselves "in each place" making crucial choices about their
identity and future. These have to do with, first, what forms of unity
will best serve to make visible the oneness of Christ's church, and
enable it to do mission most effectively in the world.
The experience of churches uniting over the past ten years--to form
the United Church in Jamaica and the Cayman Islands (1992), the Uniting
Reformed Church in Southern Africa (1994), the Uniting Presbyterian
Church in Southern Africa (1999), the Church of Jesus Christ in Lairam
(north-east India, 1999), the United Reformed Church (England and
Scotland, 2000), and, not least, the "Samen op Weg" union
process in the Netherlands--all show that (despite some misguided
comments to the contrary) organic union, understood traditionally in the
sense of structural integration, is today very much alive and well. The
Uniting Presbyterian Church in Southern Africa has testified that, in
its context, nothing short of structural integration can make the
witness to the reconciling power of the gospel needed at this time.
(From what I know of the situation in the Netherlands the same is true
there, though it is not for an outsider to say.)
At the same time, in other contexts the churches find other forms
of making unity more visible to be more feasible, at least for the
present. The wide range of communion arrangements, partnerships, sharing
in church life, common structures for oversight and parish life, all
stop short of structural integration; yet all testify authentically to
the unifying power of the gospel in their own particular context. One
important question is how all these approaches can be kept in creative
contact, for the good of the united and uniting churches family as a
while.
I believe that the Edinburgh 1937 conference still speaks an
important word to both groups of churches in reminding us all that
"organic union" means not uniformity, but "the unity of a
living organism, with the diversity characteristic of the members of a
healthy body". (8) That is: the word "organic" is there
not to impose uniformity, but precisely to insist on a proper diversity
within the unity.
A second set of choices has to do with the forms of relationship
which best correspond to the nature of the united and uniting churches,
and which will most effectively further their mission in the world. In
fact these churches have an even more complex set of inter-related
relationships than most. Locally and nationally they have links to other
churches, both united and non-united, and to the churches which did not
enter the union but remained behind, continuing a denominational life
which has otherwise ended in that place. Regionally and globally they
have links to their immediate counterparts, the regional and worldwide
family of united and uniting churches; to (in many cases) the overseas
"missioning" churches which founded the local churches from
which they are formed; and to the Christian world communions into which
those traditions are grouped. All these links can be enriching and
mutually sustaining; too often, however, and particularly at the global
level, they reflect dependence rather than interdependence.
The united and uniting churches have so far declined to form a
separate world confessional body, sensing that this would blunt the
sharpness of their witness to unity. Instead they have asked Faith and
Order (WCC)--which is mandated in its by-laws to foster common
reflection and action among churches seeking union, and those which have
united--to serve as a common contact point among them. In response Faith
and Order has organized, together with the united and uniting churches,
the series of international consultations and has published every two to
three years this survey of church union negotiations.
At their previous consultation in Jamaica in 1995, the united and
uniting churches and Faith and Order affirmed this special relationship,
while agreeing to seek broader contacts between these churches and the
WCC as a whole, and with world communions. Another important question,
then, is how the united and uniting churches can expand their circle of
contacts, without relapsing into the denominationalism from which they
have come.
The survey: instructions for use
The following reports are grouped by region and, within that, by
country. We happily extend thanks to each church union correspondent
represented in these pages. It is this worldwide network of authors
which enables the survey to be published, and who assure its distinctive
character as a collection of locally based accounts, telling in their
own words the stories of the search for union "in each place"
around the world. Please note that, as always, contact information
(including the email address and web site url) is given after each
contribution; readers are encouraged to take up questions, or requests
for further information, directly with the correspondent concerned. For
general information please contact Tom Best at the address given below.
A concluding thought
Let us conclude with words from the preparatory material for the
seventh international consultation of united and uniting churches.
Speaking to the very heart of this particular witness to the unity of
Christ's church, they reflect what is at stake:
It is sometimes forgotten that the goal of church union is not to unite
church bureaucracies; nor are they merely for the sake of efficiency or,
indeed, survival. Church unions are not the end, but the beginning, of a
process whose goal is to heal wounds, to witness to the justice and
reconciliation effected by Christ (in both the church and in the world!),
and to enable more effective witness and service to the world.
As Alastair Rodger wrote in the previous church union survey for
1996-1999, reflecting on the formation of the Uniting Presbyterian
Church in Southern Africa:
... this union is a step in faith. It does not mean that the old divisions
and all the hurts, suspicions and fear that go with them have suddenly been
overcome, but it does demonstrate a willingness to allow God to take us a
stage further in the healing process?
NOTES
(1) The survey of church union activities--which has appeared in
this form since the mid-1960s, and in other formats for some years
before that--signals one of Faith and Order's most enduring
commitments. Surveys appearing over the past twenty years have included
1983-85/86 (Faith and Order Paper no. 133, reprinted from The Ecumenical
Review, Oct. 1986), 1986-1988 (no. 146, ER, April 1989), 1988-91 (no.
154, ER, Jan. 1992), 1992-1994 (no. 169, ER, Jan. 1995), 1994-1996 (no.
176, ER, April 1997), and 1996-1999 (no. 186, ER, January 2000).
(2) Mid-Stream, vol. 6, 1967, report, pp. 10-15, notes from the
discussion, pp. 16-22; German: see Kirchenunionen und
Kirtchengemeinschaft, Hrsg. Reinhard Groscurth, Frankfurt am Main, Otto
Lembeck, 1971, report, pp. 115-21.
(3) Mid-Stream, vol. 9, 1970, report, pp.4-12, notes from the
discussion, pp. 13-33: German: see Kirchenunionen und
Kirchengemeinschaft, report, pp. 123-31, notes from the discussion, pp.
133-51.
(4) Mid-Stream, 14, 1975, report, pp. 541-63, see also What Unity
Requires, Faith and Order Paper No. 77, WCC, 1976, pp. 18-29.
(5) Growing Towards Consensus and Commitment. Faith and Order Paper
no. 110, WCC. 1981, report, pp. 1-35: see also Unity in Each Place ...
In All Places ...: United Churches and the Christian World Communions,
Michael Kinnamon ed., Faith and Order Paper no. 118, Geneva, WCC, 1983,
report, pp. 101-35, and Called to be One in Christ: United Churches and
the Ecumenical Movement, Michael Kinnamon and Thomas E Best eds. Faith
and Order Paper no. 127, Geneva, WCC, 1985; German: report: Wachsen im
Konsensus und in der Verpflichtung, Colombo 1981, Berlin, Kirchenkanzlei
der Evangelischen Kirche der Union, 1982.
(6) Living Today Toward. Visible Unity: 77w Fifth International
Consultation of United and Uniting Churches, Thomas F. Best ed., Faith
and Order Paper no. 142, Geneva, WCC, 1988, report, pp. 1-20; German:
see Gemeinsam auf dem Weg zur sichtbaren Einheit, Hrsg. Reinhard
Groscurth, Berlin, Kirchen-kanzlei der Evangelischen Kirche der Union,
1988, cf. pp. 10-11, 20-24, 27-28.
(7) Built Together: The Present Vocation of United and Uniting
Churches (Ephesians 2:22), Thomas E Best ed., Faith and Order Paper no.
174, Geneva, WCC/Faith and Order Commission, 1995, report, pp. 6-31. The
report from the sixth international consultation of untied and uniting
churches, Jamaica, 1995, is available at:
http://wcc-coe.org/wcc/what/faith/unite.html.
(8) See The Second World Conference on Faith and Order: Edinburgh
1937, Leonard Hodgson ed., New York, MacMillan, 938. p.252.
(9) The Ecumenical Review. vol. 52, no. 1, 2000, p.29.
Contact: Rev. Dr Thomas F. Best, Faith and Order, World Council of
Churches, 150 route de Ferney, P.O. Box 2100, 1211, Geneva 2,
Switzerland, tel. +41.22 791.63.35, fax +41.22 791.64.06, +41.22
710.24.52, email tfb@wcc-coe.org, web site
http://wcc-coe.org/wcc/what/faith/index-e.html.
Thomas F. Best is an executive secretary for Faith and Order, World
Council of Churches. The various union correspondents are identified at
the point of their respective contributions.