Personal income by state and region, second quarter 1992.
Friedenberg, Howard L. ; DePass, Rudolph E.
Personal income in the Nation grew slower in the second quarter of
1992 than in the first quarter. It increased 1.0 percent after
increasing 1.5 percent.(1)
In the second quarter, personal income growth slowed in 37 States,
picked up in 11 States, and was unchanged in Colorado and New Mexico.
The States with the sharpest slowdowns were Iowa, Alaska, Mississippi,
Nebraska, and Arkansas. The slowdowns in Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska,
and Arkansas were largely in farm income; the slowdown in Alaska was
spread across most industries. The States with the sharpest pickups were
North Dakota, Montana, Kansas, South Dakota, and Wyoming; the pickups
largely reflected upswings in farm income. (See tables 1 and 2 at the
end of this article.)
[TABULAR DATA OMITTED]
Income growth since the second quarter of 1991
Personal income in the Nation increased 4.7 percent in the four
quarters since the second quarter of 1991. During this period, prices
measured by the fixed-weighted price index for personal consumption
expenditures increased 3.4 percent. In all States except California,
Connecticut, and Delaware, the increases in personal income exceeded the
3.4-percent increase in prices.
Fastest growing States. - Increases in personal income in the 10
fastest growing States ranged from 8.4 percent in Montana to 6.3 percent
in Mississippi and North Carolina (table A and chart 1). As a group,
these States accounted foe less than 10 percent of the Nation's
personal income.
All 10 States had above-average increases in payrolls in retail
trade. Most had above-average increases ill payrolls in durables manufacturing, in construction, in wholesale trade, in the
finance-insurance-real estate group, in services, and in government. In
Montana, Washington, South Dakota, and Idaho, construction payrolls
increased more than 10 percent, in contrast to a 1.2-percent decline for
the Nation.
In some of the fastest growing States, payrolls in particular
industries were weak. In Montana, Nevada, Idaho, Mississippi, and North
Carolina, payrolls in the transportation and public utilities group
declined. In Montana and Idaho, farm income declined considerably more
than it did for the Nation; in Idaho and North Carolina, mining payrolls
declined considerably more than they did for the Nation.
Slowest growing States. - Increases in personal income in the 10
slowest growing States ranged from 2.7 percent in Delaware to 4.0
percent in Michigan and North Dakota. As a group, these States accounted
for about one-third of the Nation's personal income.
In Michigan, Massachusetts, Maryland, Illinois, California,
Connecticut, and Delaware, payrolls declined in durables manufacturing
and in construction. In most of these States, payrolls declined in
wholesale trade; payrolls increased at below-average rates in retail
trade, in the finance-insurance-real estate group, in services, and in
government. In Delaware, a large decline in nondurables-manufacturing
payrolls mainly reflected weakness in the chemicals industry.
In North Dakota, Florida, and Nebraska, personal income growth was
slowed by substantial declines in farm income. In North Dakota and
Florida, the declines reflected lower cash receipts; in Nebraska, the
decline reflected lower Federal subsidy payments. In addition, payrolls
in Nebraska declined in wholesale trade, and payrolls in Florida
declined in construction and in the transportation and public utilities
group.
In some of the slowest growing States, increases in payrolls in
particular industries were well above average. In North Dakota, payrolls
increased in construction and in retail trade. In Delaware, payrolls
increased in the finance-insurance-real estate group, and in Nebraska,
they increased in manufacturing.
(1.) These percent changes are not a annual rates.