首页    期刊浏览 2025年07月13日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:From Ad Hoc to Routine: A Case Study in Medieval Bureaucracy.
  • 作者:Watts, John
  • 期刊名称:Medium Aevum
  • 印刷版ISSN:0025-8385
  • 出版年度:1993
  • 期号:March
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Society for the Study of Mediaeval Languages and Literature
  • 摘要:E. E., (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1991) xii + 265 pp. ISBN 0-8122-3079-5. 35.10[pounds]. As a treatment of the origins and development of the office of General Receiver of Flanders in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, this book has considerable merit. The author has worked carefully through a large amount of difficult material to produce an account which is clear and mostly convincing, if unduly protracted. As a case study, the work is less successful. Although Dr Kittell has some interesting things to say in her introduction about die nature of bureaucracy and |routinization', there is not much hard evidence to support her claims that it was the centralized fiscal power represented by the General Receiver and his staff that enabled the counts of Flanders to gain the upper hand over the three great cities of the region (if they truly did) and to present themselves, with credibility, as the public authority. Other possible sources of comital or urban power -- conceptual, legal, military, even financial -- are largely ignored: the possibility that the bureaucratic development Kittell describes is incidental, rather than fundamental, is not considered. Comparisons with other administrative regimes are perfunctory and often dubious, and the identification of |private' with |personal' and |public' with 'impersonal' seems anachronistic in the age of the double-bodied ruler. The book has firm foundations, but there is little between them and the shaky superstructure.
  • 关键词:Book reviews;Books

From Ad Hoc to Routine: A Case Study in Medieval Bureaucracy.


Watts, John


E. E., (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1991) xii + 265 pp. ISBN 0-8122-3079-5. 35.10[pounds]. As a treatment of the origins and development of the office of General Receiver of Flanders in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, this book has considerable merit. The author has worked carefully through a large amount of difficult material to produce an account which is clear and mostly convincing, if unduly protracted. As a case study, the work is less successful. Although Dr Kittell has some interesting things to say in her introduction about die nature of bureaucracy and |routinization', there is not much hard evidence to support her claims that it was the centralized fiscal power represented by the General Receiver and his staff that enabled the counts of Flanders to gain the upper hand over the three great cities of the region (if they truly did) and to present themselves, with credibility, as the public authority. Other possible sources of comital or urban power -- conceptual, legal, military, even financial -- are largely ignored: the possibility that the bureaucratic development Kittell describes is incidental, rather than fundamental, is not considered. Comparisons with other administrative regimes are perfunctory and often dubious, and the identification of |private' with |personal' and |public' with 'impersonal' seems anachronistic in the age of the double-bodied ruler. The book has firm foundations, but there is little between them and the shaky superstructure.

联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有