History of Whaling and Estimated Kill of Right Whales, Balaena glacialis, in the Northeastern United States, 1620-1924.
REEVES, RANDALL R. ; BREIWICK, JEFFREY M. ; MITCHELL, EDWARD D. 等
Introduction
This study of shore whaling for right whales, Balaena glacialis(1)
(Fig. 1), along the U.S. east coast is part of a broad review of the
history of right whaling in the western North Atlantic. Previously,
Reeves and Mitchell surveyed whale charts (1983) and compiled catch data
for shore whaling on Long Island, N.Y. (1986a), American pelagic whaling
in the North Atlantic (1986b), and shore whaling in North Carolina
(1988). Reeves and Barto (1985) reviewed the scant information on shore
and pelagic whaling in the Bay of Fundy, a present-day summering ground
for right whales. Other authors have discussed the large 16th and 17th
century Basque hunts for balaenids, including both right whales and
bowhead whales, Balaena mysticetus (Cumbaa, 1986), in the Strait of
Belle Isle and along the Labrador coast (Barkham, 1984; Aguilar, 1986;
Proulx, 1993; Ross, 1993). New England whalers are said to have killed
"a good many" right whales in the Gulf of St. Lawrence during
the 18th century (Wakeham, 1913), although the species composition and
size of their catches have yet to be properly evaluated (cf. Mitchell
and Reeves, 1983).
[Figure 1 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
The main objective of our catch-history studies has been to assess
early distribution and abundance. An ultimate goal is to improve
understanding of the population history and contribute to analyses of
trends. Although it is unlikely that the carrying capacity for right
whales would be the same at present as it was in the mid 17th century
when American whaling began, we have no reliable means of estimating
either the direction or magnitude of change in carrying capacity through
time. It is possible that aspects of the environment are better for
right whales now than they were at some other times during the past 400
years. It is usually assumed, however, that human activities have
altered conditions in a mainly negative way and that the coastal marine
environment off eastern North America is capable of supporting fewer
right whales now than was the case in pre-modern times (Katona and
Kraus, 1999). We believe that a minimum estimate of pre-exploitation
population size can be useful in designing and assessing recovery
efforts. In its Final Recovery Plan for the northern right whale, the
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Right Whale Recovery Team
indicates that the establishment of recovery goals and the evaluation of
progress toward them "should be based on pre-exploitation numbers,
if possible" (NMFS, 1991:40). The plan further urges that such
"numbers" be refined through historical research in addition
to that available in 1991. Our goal is to use the present compilation,
along with other related studies, for a comprehensive reconstruction of
the catch history and a more rigorous estimate of the population size in
the 17th century (Reeves et al.(2)).
The catch history of the North Atlantic right whale is difficult to
reconstruct due, in large part, to the antiquity of the whaling
enterprise (Fig. 2). According to Allen (1916), right whales had already
become scarce in New England by about 1725 due to overhunting. Much of
the whaling for right whales before and after that date (Fig. 3 and 4)
was undocumented or poorly documented. Some of the documentation that
did exist has been lost or destroyed. What survived is often difficult
to find and interpret.
[Figures 2-4 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
The geographic emphasis of the present paper is on the New England
and mid-Atlantic states from Maine to Delaware (from about lat. 45
[degrees] N to 38 [degrees] 30'N) (Fig. 2 and 5). The temporal
focus is from 1620, the year of the Mayflower's arrival near
present-day Provincetown, Mass., to 1918, when the last right whale was
struck at Long Island, N.Y. Our intention is to document as fully as
possible the kill of right whales off the eastern United States from the
early 1600's to 1924, when the last Long Island whaler retired
(Reeves and Mitchell, 1986a).
[Figure 5 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Schevill et al. (1986) compared the frequency of right whale
sightings off Cape Cod for 1955-81 to the frequency of records listed by
Allen (1916) for the period 1620-1913. They concluded that right whales
did not appear to be greatly reduced in numbers in New England during
the recent period when compared to data from 350 years previously:
"The population of right whales passing near Cape Cod is at worst
only slightly smaller now than it was in the 17th century"
(Schevill et al., 1986). That conclusion runs counter to the widely held
belief that the western North Atlantic population remains severely
depleted and has failed to recover (Mitchell, 1975; Reeves et al., 1978;
Mead, 1986; Gaskin, 1987; Kraus et al., 1988).
Gaskin (1991) used the analysis by Schevill et al. (1986) to
support the hypothesis that right whales summering in the Bay of Fundy
and Roseway Basin areas are a deme or "substock" of the more
widely distributed western North Atlantic population. A supposed
preference for deeper shelf water would have allowed this group to at
least partially escape "the full pressures of colonial
whaling" (Gaskin, 1991). Gaskin argued that because they remained
south of Cabot Strait in summer, these whales also would not have been
subjected to exploitation by the early Basque whalers to the north. This
interesting hypothesis is not supported by the evidence of long-distance
movements by individuals (e.g. from the Scotian Shelf to Denmark Strait
and from the southeastern United States to the Labrador Basin (Knowlton
et al., 1992)). However, surviving founders may have contributed to a
drift toward reclusive behavior in the current population.
Materials and Methods
We made an extensive literature search, including sources cited by
Starbuck (1878), Clark (1887), True (1904), Allen (1908), Allen (1916),
Edwards and Rattray (1932), Weiss et al. (1974), and Lipton (1975). Many
more sources were identified in whaling museum indexes and our own
files. A sample of newspapers was searched systematically using indexes
whenever possible (Table 1).
Table 1.--A sample of newspapers searched for Information on right
whale catches.
Newspaper Town or city, state
Daily Eagle Brooklyn, N.Y.
Herald New York, N.Y.
Evening Post New York, N.Y.
Tribune New York, N.Y.
Times New York, N.Y.
Morning News Savannah, Ga.
Journal Nantucket, Mass.
Inquirer Nantucket, Mass.
Inquirer and Mirror Nantucket, Mass.
Whalemen's Shipping List and
Merchants' Transcript New Bedford, Mass.
The Whaleman New Bedford, Mass.
Reporter and Seaman's
Weekly Visitor New Bedford, Mass.
Pioneer Mystic, Conn.
Newspaper Years checked Indexed
Daily Eagle 1891-1902 Yes
Herald 1913-1918 (incomplete) Yes
Evening Post 1873-1921 (incomplete) Yes
Tribune 1862-1865, 1875-1906 Yes
Times 1851-1893, 1905-1924 Yes
Morning News 1850-1875 Yes
Journal 1884-1897 No
Inquirer 1822-1864 No
Inquirer and Mirror 1870-1891 No
Whalemen's Shipping List and
Merchants' Transcript 1843-1914 No
The Whaleman 1854 No
Reporter and Seaman's
Weekly Visitor 1846-1847 No
Pioneer 1859-1861 No
Allen's (1916) review of baleen whales in New England included
a search of at least the Nantucket Journal (1878-99), Nantucket Inquirer
(1822-64), and Nantucket Inquirer and Mirror (1867-1909), and apparently
some issues of the Provincetown Advocate, Boston Journal, Boston Daily
Globe, Forest and Stream, Boston Semi-Weekly Advertiser, Newburyport
Herald, Boston Gazette, and Barnstable Patriot. We made our own search
of the Nantucket newspapers (most of the right whale data for New York
was reported by Reeves and Mitchell (1986a)) and checked some issues of
newspapers from other areas where whaling was known or suspected to have
occurred. In these searches, we gave special attention to periods
immediately preceding or following dates on which whaling events had
been reported. Some manuscripts, including correspondence, diaries, and
account books of companies and individuals involved in shore whaling,
were checked at whaling museums, historical societies, and local
libraries in New England.
One of us (Reeves) examined customs records of the London Board of
Trade for information on whale products imported to Great Britain from
the American colonies, including Carolina, Virginia, and Maryland
(Reeves and Mitchell, 1988), Pennsylvania, New York, New Providence, New
England, Newfoundland, the Bermudas (Fig. 6), and the West Indies, as
well as "prize goods" taken by British vessels from captured
ships. These and other manuscript records in the Public Record Office,
Kew, London, supplemented the catch data from published sources. We
assumed that all of the oil and baleen attributed to the American
colonies in the British customs records through 1735 came from whales
killed (or found dead from natural causes) in the western North
Atlantic.
[Figure 6 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
The British customs records give product quantities in units that
are not all familiar today: oil in tuns (abbreviated as "T"),
hogsheads (Hh), and gallons (gal); baleen (whalebone or whale
"fins") in hundredweight (cwt), quarters (qtr), and pounds
(lb). With the exception of the blubber returns from Newfoundland, all
of the relevant values for oil are given as liquid (volume) measures
(Fig. 7, 8). Lindquist (1992) provided a valuable review of old whale
oil measurements, and we have used his equivalents as standards. Thus,
we have assumed that tuns (or T in some records) represent 252 gallons.
The gallon was not standardized until 1707 (during the period with which
we are concerned, 1697-1734), before which time its size usually varied
between 224 cubic inches (3.671 liters) and 282 cubic inches (4.621
liters). In 1707 it was standardized (as "Queen Anne's
gallon," which is the same as today's U.S. standard gallon) at
231 cubic inches (3.785 liters). This means that our production data
pre-1707 are approximate, while those from 1707 onward are more exact.
It should be noted that the imperial standard gallon was not established
in the United Kingdom until 1825. A hogshead was a quarter of a tun (63
gallons), and the gallons were assumed to be "Queen Anne's
gallons." The weight measures were assumed to be straightforward: a
hundredweight representing 112 lb (50.8 kg), a quarter being 28 lb (12.7
kg), and a lb being the standard 16 ounces (0.45 kg). An oil cask or
barrel was defined in 1675 (General Court of Assizes, New York) as
containing 31.5 gallons (Edwards and Rattray 1932:274-275), so we
assumed throughout this paper that barrels contained 31.5 (U.S.) gallons
of oil.
[Figures 7-8 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Estimates of average yield are required for converting amounts of
oil or baleen to estimates of whales caught. We used the available data
on yields from various parts of the North Atlantic to obtain such
estimates (Table 2). The values used for conversions (44 barrels of oil
and 647 lb of baleen per whale) are similar to those used by Reeves and
Mitchell (1986a, b) but are substantially different from those used by
Best (1987). The latter author estimated average yields for right whales
of 67 barrels of oil and 563 lb of baleen based on samples of 3,080 and
884 whales, respectively. These large samples included whales from the
Southern Hemisphere and the North Atlantic but not the North Pacific.
Table 2.--Yields of oil and baleen estimated from North Atlantic
catch data.(1)
Oil (bbl)
Area Period N(2) Mean SE(3)
Northeast U.S. shore-based 1725-1895 24 53 5.5
Long Island 1707-1918 69 34 1.6
Southeast U.S. pelagic 1875-1882 16 58 4.7
Southeast U.S. shore-based 1874-1916 7 38 3.6
Cape Farewell 1868-1886 9 66 9.0
Cintra Bay 1856-1880 12 55 7.9
All areas combined 137 44 1.9
Baleen (lb)
Area N Mean SE Source(4)
Northeast U.S. shore-based 9 698 136 A
Long Island 5 659 126 B
Southeast U.S. pelagic 15 676 44 C
Southeast U.S. shore-based 7 539 93 D
Cape Farewell 4 600 --(5) C
Cintra Bay -- -- -- C
All areas combined 40 647 40(6)
(1) Generally not including values reported as "expected"
yields.
(2) N = number of whales.
(3) SE = Standard error of the mean.
(4) A = This paper, B = Reeves and Mitchell (1986a), C = Reeves and
Mitchell (1986b), D = Reeves and Mitchell (1988).
(5) Data were reported as 2,400 lb obtained from 4 whales; no
information on individual yields.
(6) SE = 45 if the Cape Farewell sample is not included.
Newspaper reports often referred to expected, rather than realized,
yields of oil and baleen. Usually, but not always, the estimates of
yield prior to flensing proved to have been upwardly biased. Whalemen
and newspaper reporters were often overly optimistic about how much a
whale would produce. For example, a 40 foot (12.2 m) right whale taken
off Amagansett (Long Island, N.Y.) in February 1897 was expected to
produce 30 barrels of oil and 600-700 lb of baleen (Reeves and Mitchell,
1986a, their Table 1), but it actually produced only 18 bbl and 375 lb
(our Table 7, below). Although we tried to eliminate untrustworthy
reports from our sample, the estimated averages in Table 2 are probably
influenced by this bias to some degree. We suspect that, in some cases,
there was also a tendency to report the yields of exceptionally large
whales and to leave out any mention of yield when describing
unremarkable whales. The effect of both types of bias (exaggerated
reporting and selective reporting) would have been to cause an
over-estimation of average yield, and, in turn, an underestimation of
the number of whales taken. For reasons explained in the Results
section, no catches were estimated from the British import data from New
Providence, Newfoundland, the Bermudas, the West Indies, or "prize
goods."
Table 7.--Information on Long Island shore whaling not included in
Reeves and Mitchell (1986a, their Table 1).Where Reeves and Mitchell
(1986a) is cited as one of the sources, the data presented here
supplement or clarify those given in their table.
Date Locality Comments
4 September 1766 Coney Island 40 ft, expected to yield
70 bbl.
June 1850 Peconic Bay Whale taken; 33 ft.
March 1883 Amagansett Large [right] whale struck
and lost; carcass seen
floating "miles off the
shore" next day.
27 December 1893 Southampton The large right whale was
taken by 2 boats headed by
Captains Rogers and Hubert
White, "two retired Arctic
whalemen"; estimated worth:
$2,000.
Winter 1883-84 Amagansett No whales seen.
7 April 1894 Amagansett Large right whale,
50 ft long, baleen 7 ft,
expected yield of at least
50 bbls.
Early March 1895 Bridgehampton Right whale chased by 2
boats.
17 October 1895 Easthampton Right whale and fin whale
and Amagansett chased by 2 boats.
4 November 1895 Gardiners Bay Fin whale chased by 2
Greenport boats.
20 February 1897 Amagansett 40 ft right whale, produced
less oil and bone than
expected. Actual yield was
18 bbls, 375 lbs; expected
yield had been 30 bbls,
600-700 lbs.
Early December 1905 E of Fire Capt. Tyson Dominy of
Island Inlet Easthampton killed 3
finbacks; all sank.
22 March 1907 Amagansett 5 boats chased a whale.
21 March 1911 Southampton 2 boats chased a "school"
of whales.
Date Locality Source
4 September 1766 Coney Island Weiss et al., 1974:104
June 1850 Peconic Bay Caulkins, 1895:639
March 1883 Amagansett New York Tribune,
26 Jan. 1885, p. 5
27 December 1893 Southampton Reeves and Mitchell, 1986a;
New York Tribune,
28 Dec. 1893, p. 5
Winter 1883-84 Amagansett New York Tribune,
26 Jan. 1885, p. 5
7 April 1894 Amagansett New York Tribune,
8 Apr. 1894, p. 1;
Brooklyn Daily Eagle,
8 Apr. 1894, p. 2;
Reeves and Mitchell, 1986a
Early March 1895 Bridgehampton Brooklyn Daily Eagle,
10 March 1895, p. 7
17 October 1895 Easthampton East Hampton Star,
and Amagansett 18 Oct. 1895;
Brooklyn Daily Eagle,
19 Oct. 1895, p. 7
4 November 1895 Gardiners Bay Brooklyn Daily Eagle,
4 Nov. 1895
20 February 1897 Amagansett Reeves and Mitchell, 1986a;
Brooklyn Daily Eagle,
26 Feb. 1897, p. 4
Early December 1905 E of Fire New York Tribune,
Island Inlet 11 Dec. 1905, p. 8
22 March 1907 Amagansett New York Sun,
23 March 1907, p. 5
21 March 1911 Southampton New York Tribune,
22 March 1911, p. 14
Results
Summaries by State
Maine
Norton (1930) summarized evidence of whaling along the Maine coast
but found little evidence that right whales were taken (also see Allen,
1916). Whaling began in what is now Maine as early as the 17th century
and continued at least sporadically until the early 20th century
(Martin, 1975). The whaling that was conducted from the 19th century on,
however, appears to have been directed primarily at fin whales,
Balaenoptera physalus, and humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae
(Goode, 1884:27; Clark, 1887:41; Allen, 1916:313; Mitchell and Reeves,
1983). There is little evidence of whaling in the Bay of Fundy, apart
from cruises for humpbacks and fin whales by New England whalers during
the 1880's (Reeves and Barto, 1985). One whale, probably a right
whale, was taken in the bay and brought to Boston in August 1733
(Starbuck, 1878), and another was taken in Head Harbour Passage near
Eastport in the late 1700's (Reeves and Barto, 1985). A whale was
shot at Surry, Maine, in late September 1865 after stranding between two
reefs (Whalemen's Shipping List 23(31), Oct. 1865). A right whale
came ashore dead in Sheepscot Bay in summer 1919 (Norton, 1930).
New Hampshire
Allen (1916) mentioned nothing of shore whaling in present-day New
Hampshire. A 50 ft whale, with a head 16 ft broad and "shaped like
that of the horse," and differing from "all others that have
been seen by those acquainted with that species of fish," was
captured in the Piscataqua River, late June 1827 (The Corrector, Sag
Harbor, N.Y., 6(9), 30 June 1827). It is unclear whether this capture
was by whalemen or fishermen.
Massachusetts Mainland Including Cape Cod (1620-1910)
Beginnings of shore whaling (1620-1690). Shore whaling in the
eastern United States may have begun at Cape Cod, particularly at
Provincetown (Freeman, 1862:631; Shearman, 1876). At least one British
expedition came to New England "to take whales" in the first
quarter of the 17th century (Smith, 1624:204), and some of the Plymouth
settlers in 1620 apparently were equipped for whaling (Thacher,
1832:20-21). The master and mate of the Mayflower expressed their
intention of hunting whales off Cape Cod in winter 1620-21 (Anonymous,
1802:204), but we do not know whether they in fact did so. Winthrop
(1825, 1:157) claimed when 3-4 whales were "cast ashore" on
Cape Cod in April 1635 that this was not unusual. Whether these were
drift whales harpooned but not secured by whalers is impossible to tell
(see Drift Whales, below).
The direct hunting of right whales probably began in early New
England well before 1650, when, according to some authors, the first
private whaling company in North America was licensed at Southampton,
Long Island (Hedges et al., 1874:70; Starbuck, 1878:9-10). Starbuck
(1878:6) noted: "As important as the pursuit of whaling seemed to
have been considered by the first [New England] settlers, many years
seem to have elapsed before it was followed as a business, though
probably something was attempted in that direction prior to any recorded
account that we have." De Vries (1853) referred to the English
"experimenting off the coast of New England with a limited kind of
shore whaling" in the 1630's. They supposedly had trained
selected Native Americans to serve as harpooners and oarsmen, in the
absence of skilled Basques to fill these roles. Allen (1908:314) claimed
that "a few whales, in addition to stranded or drift whales, were
taken in Massachusetts Bay as early as 1631." A man was killed
trying to secure a struck whale in Boston harbor in 1668 (Bradstreet,
1855:44), and Ipswich Bay was described in the early 1670's as a
place "where they fish for Whales" (Josselyn, 1833:323). We
can safely assume, then, that shore whaling was well established in
Massachusetts by no later than the 1670's. Governor Hinckley's
representation to the King of England on behalf of New Plymouth Colony
in 1687 emphasized the relative importance of whale products in the
economies of the Cape Cod towns (Collect. Mass. Hist. Soc., Ser. 4, V:
178), and a resident of the colony proclaimed in 1688 that the people
had made "great profit by whale killing" (Randolph, quoted in
Felt, 1849:223).
Peak Years of Shore Whaling (1690-1725). Shore whaling was a major
industry on Cape Cod and the Massachusetts mainland from the last
decades of the 17th century through the first quarter of the 18th
century. Although only several dozen captures of right whales are
documented for this period (Table 3), many more must have been made. The
catch of 29 whales in one day in Cape Cod Bay in 1700 implies that
several crews were engaged. The Cotton Mather (1912:379)journal for 1716
refers to "our numerous tribe of Whale-Catchers."
Table 3.--Records of right whales from New England (excluding
Nantucket: see Table 4). State is Massachusetts unless otherwise
indicated. For additional Connecticut records, see Tables 6 and 7.
Whales
Struck/
Date Locality Seen Taken lost
Dec. 1620 Cape Cod +
April 1635 Cape Cod
1654 Weymouth
1662 Off 1
Narragansett
Bay
1662 Barnstable
1665 Yarmouth
1668 Boston Harbor 1
1672 Yarmouth
Winter 1690 "Cape Cod 1
Harbour"
Winter 1691 Cape Cod 1
1692 Edgartown 1
1697 Yarmouth 2
Winter 1699-1700 Cape Cod Bay 29+
(before 27
January)
February 1703 Martha's 3
Vineyard
Late in 1706, Ipswich Several
probably Dec.
Early December Boston Harbor 1 1
1707
25 Nov. 1712 Duxbury
1720 Squibnocket,
Martha's
Vineyard
1722-23 Vicinity of
Salem
Spring 1723 Massachusetts 8
Bay (?)
1725 Noman's Land 1
March 1736 Off 1[2?]
Provincetown
11 May 1736 40 leagues E. 2
of Georges
Bank
Up to 5 Jan., Provincetown 2
season of
1737-38
Up to Feb., Yarmouth 1
season of
1737-38.
1738-39 Provincetown 6
1
1738-39 Sandwich 2
1746 Cape Cod [is less
than or
equal to]
3 or 4
10 Feb. 1755 Truro
Dec. 1756 King's [Lynn] 1
Beach
1770 Duxbury
14 Jan. 1795 In Buzzards
Bay
4 Dec. 1808 Winter Island,
near Salem
April 1822 Boston Bay 1
Late March 1824 Martha's 1
Vineyard
5 April 1824 New Haven,
Conn.
19 Feb. 1828 Newport, R.I. 1
11 April 1835 Provincetown 1
1 Sept. 1838 Newburyport
25 March 1841 Edgartown 1
12 May 1841 Westport Point 2
11 May 1843 SE of Chatham 1
(Great South
Channel)
Mid-April 1848 Plymouth +
Late Jan. 1850 Provincetown 1
Harbor
Early Feb. 1850 Provincetown 1
Harbor
1 Nov. 1850 Provincetown 1
Mid-May 1852 Provincetown 1
(in
Massachusetts
Bay)
Early Oct. 1852 Massachusetts 2
Bay
April 1853 Provincetown 2 1?
Harbor
11 Dec. 1854 Provincetown 1
Late Nov. 1858 Provincetown
17-24 March 1860 Provincetown Several 1
April 1864 Plymouth (but 1
towed to
Provincetown)
1867 Cape Cod Bay, 1
near
Provincetown
1 March 1870 Provincetown 2 1
town
1887 Provincetown 1
20 May 1888 Provincetown 2
(Massachusetts
Bay)
May 1888 Provincetown 1
1 June 1888 Provincetown 1 1
1893 Tiverton, R.I. 1
1894 Fort Adams, 1
R.I.
October 1894 Boston Bay 1
Late March 1895 Nahant 1
15 Jan. 1909 Provincetown 1
Spring 1910 Provincetown 1
Whales I.D.
certainty
Date Locality Chased Drift (1)
Dec. 1620 Cape Cod 1
April 1635 Cape Cod 3-4 2
1654 Weymouth 1 1
1662 Off 1
Narragansett
Bay
1662 Barnstable 1 1
1665 Yarmouth 2 1
1668 Boston Harbor 1
1672 Yarmouth 1 1
Winter 1690 "Cape Cod 1
Harbour"
Winter 1691 Cape Cod 1
1692 Edgartown 1
1697 Yarmouth 1
Winter 1699-1700 Cape Cod Bay 1
(before 27
January)
February 1703 Martha's 1
Vineyard
Late in 1706, Ipswich 1
probably Dec.
Early December Boston Harbor 1
1707
25 Nov. 1712 Duxbury 1 2
1720 Squibnocket, 1 2
Martha's
Vineyard
1722-23 Vicinity of 2 1
Salem
Spring 1723 Massachusetts 2
Bay (?)
1725 Noman's Land 1
March 1736 Off 1
Provincetown
11 May 1736 40 leagues E. 2
of Georges
Bank
Up to 5 Jan., Provincetown 2
season of
1737-38
Up to Feb., Yarmouth 1
season of
1737-38.
1738-39 Provincetown 2
1
1738-39 Sandwich 2
1746 Cape Cod 2
10 Feb. 1755 Truro 1 2
Dec. 1756 King's [Lynn] 2
Beach
1770 Duxbury 1 2
14 Jan. 1795 In Buzzards 2 2
Bay
4 Dec. 1808 Winter Island, 1 2
near Salem
April 1822 Boston Bay 2
Late March 1824 Martha's 2
Vineyard
5 April 1824 New Haven, 1 [?]
Conn.
19 Feb. 1828 Newport, R.I. 1
11 April 1835 Provincetown 1
1 Sept. 1838 Newburyport 1 1
25 March 1841 Edgartown 1
12 May 1841 Westport Point 1
11 May 1843 SE of Chatham 1
(Great South
Channel)
Mid-April 1848 Plymouth + 1
Late Jan. 1850 Provincetown 1
Harbor
Early Feb. 1850 Provincetown 1
Harbor
1 Nov. 1850 Provincetown 1
Mid-May 1852 Provincetown 1
(in
Massachusetts
Bay)
Early Oct. 1852 Massachusetts 2
Bay
April 1853 Provincetown 2
Harbor
11 Dec. 1854 Provincetown 1
Late Nov. 1858 Provincetown 1 1
17-24 March 1860 Provincetown 2
April 1864 Plymouth (but 1
towed to
Provincetown)
1867 Cape Cod Bay, 1
near
Provincetown
1 March 1870 Provincetown 1
town
1887 Provincetown 1
20 May 1888 Provincetown 1
(Massachusetts
Bay)
May 1888 Provincetown 1
1 June 1888 Provincetown 1
1893 Tiverton, R.I. 2
1894 Fort Adams, 1
R.I.
October 1894 Boston Bay 1
Late March 1895 Nahant 1
15 Jan. 1909 Provincetown 1
Spring 1910 Provincetown 1
Date Locality Comments
Dec. 1620 Cape Cod "Large whales of the
best kind for oil
and bone."
April 1635 Cape Cod "Cast on shore."
1654 Weymouth "Taken" or found.
1662 Off See text.
Narragansett
Bay
1662 Barnstable Plymouth Colony
received tax on a
[drift?] whale.
1665 Yarmouth Taxes ordered paid
on 2 [drift?]
whales.
1668 Boston Harbor
1672 Yarmouth [Damaged carcass].
Winter 1690 "Cape Cod "Large."
Harbour"
Winter 1691 Cape Cod
1692 Edgartown "Cast on shore";
supposedly killed by
a harpooner, "on a
whale design."
1697 Yarmouth Mother 55 ft and
calf 20 ft.
Winter 1699-1700 Cape Cod Bay 29 in one day by all
(before 27 the boats working in
January) the area.
February 1703 Martha's "Great whales,
Vineyard betwixt six and
seven and eight foot
bone."
Late in 1706, Ipswich
probably Dec.
Early December Boston Harbor 40 ft.
1707
25 Nov. 1712 Duxbury Boat chasing a
whale, "all
drowned."
1720 Squibnocket,
Martha's
Vineyard
1722-23 Vicinity of "Drift" whales,
Salem claimants may prove
their right [to the
carcasses] before
courts of the
admiralty."
Spring 1723 Massachusetts Brought into Boston
Bay (?) by vessels from that
port; some may have
been sperm whales.
1725 Noman's Land 26-barrel, by a
6-man crew.
March 1736 Off "Large" est.
Provincetown 100 bbls oil; taken
"at sea" by a
Provincetown vessel.
11 May 1736 40 leagues E. Could have been
of Georges sperm whales,
Bank judging by location
and circumstances.
Up to 5 Jan., Provincetown "Small."
season of
1737-38
Up to Feb., Yarmouth Baleen 8-9 ft; large
season of
1737-38.
1738-39 Provincetown "Small."
"Large," baleen
6 ft.
1738-39 Sandwich "Small."
1746 Cape Cod
10 Feb. 1755 Truro
Dec. 1756 King's [Lynn] 75 ft, man "rode
Beach into his mouth,
in a chair drawn by
a horse"; 2 ribs
were used for gate
posts.
1770 Duxbury Carcass found near
shore, being eaten
by sharks, 16+ bbls.
14 Jan. 1795 In Buzzards Two 40-bbl whales
Bay chased by "several"
boats within 3 mi of
New Bedford.
4 Dec. 1808 Winter Island, Found "in the
near Salem offing"; "grounded,"
60 ft.
April 1822 Boston Bay By a Cape Cod
vessel; broke line
and escaped.
Late March 1824 Martha's "Small." Found dead
Vineyard by schooner Ruby of
Boston; blubber
taken to Edgartown
for trying out; made
33-40 bbls; thought
to have been struck
by whalers operating
from S side of
island.
5 April 1824 New Haven, In harbor, chased by
Conn. local "enterprising
seamen."
19 Feb. 1828 Newport, R.I. 70 bbls, 44 ft,
pursued by 4 boats
and twice harpooned
on 18 Feb.; finally
taken by Capt.
Potter of Newport.
11 April 1835 Provincetown By schooner Columbia
of Provincetown,
expected to produce
75-80 bbls.
1 Sept. 1838 Newburyport Ca. 40 ft; found
dead; ca. 40 bbls.
25 March 1841 Edgartown 40-45 bbl.
12 May 1841 Westport Point Ca. 50 ft, 40 bbls;
ca. 25 ft, 20 bbls;
4-5 boats chased;
1,500 gallons oil
expected.
11 May 1843 SE of Chatham Very large. By
(Great South schooner Cordelia of
Channel) Provincetown 125
bbls and 300 lb
baleen saved; 14 ft
baleen. Length of
baleen and potential
yield (supposedly
ca. 1 1/2 tons baleen,
ca. 300 bbls) suggest
a bowhead.
Mid-April 1848 Plymouth "Considerable number"
seen, chased by 5
vessels.
Late Jan. 1850 Provincetown "Large."
Harbor
Early Feb. 1850 Provincetown "Large," 50 bbls.
Harbor
1 Nov. 1850 Provincetown "Large," 60 bbls.
Mid-May 1852 Provincetown "Large," 75 bbls, 8
(in ft baleen.
Massachusetts
Bay)
Early Oct. 1852 Massachusetts By a Provincetown
Bay schooner.
April 1853 Provincetown
Harbor
11 Dec. 1854 Provincetown Drifted ashore
mid-Dec, at Sandwich,
48 ft, 30-40 or 60
bbls; harpoon
suggested it was
Provincetown whale
killed but lost on
11th.
Late Nov. 1858 Provincetown One whale "several
times fired at with
harpoon guns,
eventually escaped."
17-24 March 1860 Provincetown By Samuel Loper and
others; "several"
seen in harbor on 18
March.
April 1864 Plymouth (but Large, 47-48 ft;
towed to produced 80 [or 83]
Provincetown) bbls, 14 gallons;
1001 lb baleen.
Skeleton in Museum of
Comparative Zoology;
baleen 7 ft.
1867 Cape Cod Bay, Large, 48 ft, 84
near bbls, 1,000 lbs
Provincetown baleen.
1 March 1870 Provincetown Mother and calf, cow
town struck; while
lancing, the line
had to be cut.
1887 Provincetown Large, male, 47 ft;
70 bbls.
20 May 1888 Provincetown Large, produced 170
(Massachusetts bbls (one gave 80
Bay) bbls, 800 lbs
baleen).
May 1888 Provincetown Large, found dead
near Georges Bank;
probably killed by
steamer A.B.
Nickerson; 50 ft.
1 June 1888 Provincetown Mother and calf.
Mother 55-60 ft,
produced 100 bbls,
1,500 lb baleen;
"unusually large and
fat"; calf sank;
killed with bomb
lances by steamer
A.B. Nickerson.(2)
1893 Tiverton, R.I. Large, ca. 50 ft,
stranded at Newport,
R.I.
1894 Fort Adams, First seen off
R.I. Conanicut Is., R.I.
October 1894 Boston Bay Thought to have been
the whale killed at
Nahant the following
March; may have
overwintered in this
area.
Late March 1895 Nahant Large, male, escaped
towing gear; found
dead on 1 April, 25
mi N. of Race Point;
42 ft, 50-60 bbls; 5
1 1/2 ft baleen.
15 Jan. 1909 Provincetown Small, female,
entangled in fish
trap, killed with
bomb lance; 10.59 m;
a "scrag."
Spring 1910 Provincetown
Date Locality Sources
Dec. 1620 Cape Cod Thacher, 1832:20
April 1635 Cape Cod Winthrop, 1825:157
1654 Weymouth Shurtleff, 1854:191
1662 Off Sporri, 1677 (in
Narragansett Bridenbaugh, 1974,
Bay app. V, p. 144-145)
1662 Barnstable Shurtleff, 1857:165
1665 Yarmouth Shurtleff, 1855:99
1668 Boston Harbor Bradstreet, 1855:44
1672 Yarmouth Crapo, 1876:66;
Allen, 1916:151
Winter 1690 "Cape Cod Felt, 1849:224;
Harbour"
Starbuck, 1878:18
Winter 1691 Cape Cod Felt, 1849:224;
Starbuck, 1878:18
1692 Edgartown Starbuck, 1878:18
1697 Yarmouth Allen, 1916:129, 133
Winter 1699-1700 Cape Cod Bay Allen, 1916:131
(before 27
January)
February 1703 Martha's Starbuck, 1878:35
Vineyard [erroneously
attributed to 1793
by Crapo, 1876:65,
and subsequently
Allen, 1908:319]
Late in 1706, Ipswich Felt, 1834:109
probably Dec.
Early December Boston Harbor Starbuck, 1878:34;
1707 Allen, 1916:133
25 Nov. 1712 Duxbury Allen, 1916:134
1720 Squibnocket, Banks, 1966a:44
Martha's
Vineyard
1722-23 Vicinity of Felt, 1849:224
Salem
Spring 1723 Massachusetts Starbuck, 1878:168
Bay (?)
1725 Noman's Land Banks, 1966a:435
March 1736 Off Allen, 1916:134;
Provincetown Starbuck, 1878:32,
158 [see Boston
News-Letter, 18
March and 1 April
1736]
11 May 1736 40 leagues E. Starbuck, 1878:32
of Georges [see Boston
Bank News-Letter, 27
May 1736]
Up to 5 Jan., Provincetown Allen, 1916:158-159;
season of Starbuck, 1878:32-33
1737-38
Up to Feb., Yarmouth Allen, 1916:159;
season of Starbuck, 1878:32-33
1737-38.
1738-39 Provincetown Allen, 1916:159;
Starbuck, 1878:32-33
1738-39 Sandwich Allen, 1916:159;
Starbuck, 1878,
p. 32-33
1746 Cape Cod Douglass, 1760:59
10 Feb. 1755 Truro Allen, 1916:134
Dec. 1756 King's [Lynn] The Corrector, Sag
Beach Harbor, 8(42), 13
Feb. 1830
1770 Duxbury Winsor, 1849:86
14 Jan. 1795 In Buzzards New Bedford Medley,
Bay 16 Jan. 1795
4 Dec. 1808 Winter Island, Bentley, 1911:400
near Salem
April 1822 Boston Bay Allen, 1916:134-135;
Nantucket Inquirer
2(17): 25 April 1822
Late March 1824 Martha's Nantucket Inquirer
Vineyard 4(15): 5 April 1824
5 April 1824 New Haven, Nantucket Inquirer
Conn. 4(16): 12 April 1824
19 Feb. 1828 Newport, R.I. Allen, 1916:135;
Clark, 1887:48; New
London Gazette,
27 Feb. 1828
11 April 1835 Provincetown New-Bedford Mercury
1 Sept. 1838 Newburyport Allen, 1916:135, 140
25 March 1841 Edgartown New Bedford Mercury,
34(40), 2 April 1841
12 May 1841 Westport Point Morgan, 1841; New
Bedford Mercury, 34
(46), 14 May 1841
11 May 1843 SE of Chatham Allen, 1916:135;
(Great South Jennings, 1890:
Channel) 193-94
Mid-April 1848 Plymouth Allen, 1916:136
Late Jan. 1850 Provincetown Allen, 1916:136
Harbor
Early Feb. 1850 Provincetown Allen, 1916:136
Harbor
1 Nov. 1850 Provincetown Allen, 1916:136;
Clark, 1887:41;
Goode, 1884:24n
Mid-May 1852 Provincetown Allen, 1916:136
(in
Massachusetts
Bay)
Early Oct. 1852 Massachusetts Allen, 1916:136
Bay
April 1853 Provincetown Allen, 1916:136-137
Harbor
11 Dec. 1854 Provincetown Allen, 1916:137;
Nantucket Inquirer,
34(153):25 Dec. 1854;
WSL 12(43):26 Dec.
1854
Late Nov. 1858 Provincetown Allen, 1916:137
17-24 March 1860 Provincetown WSL 18(3):
27 March 1860
April 1864 Plymouth (but Allen, 1916:118, 137,
towed to 171; Allen, 1908:322
Provincetown)
1867 Cape Cod Bay, Goode, 1884:24
near
Provincetown
1 March 1870 Provincetown Allen, 1916:137
town
1887 Provincetown Allen, 1916:138
20 May 1888 Provincetown Allen, 1916:138-139,
(Massachusetts 171; WSL 46(17):29
Bay) May 1888
May 1888 Provincetown Allen, 1916:139; WSL
46(17):29 May 1888
1 June 1888 Provincetown Allen, 1916:130-131,
139, 143, 171; WSL
46(19):12 June 1888
1893 Tiverton, R.I. Allen, 1916:139
1894 Fort Adams, Allen, 1916:139
R.I.
October 1894 Boston Bay Allen, 1916:139
Late March 1895 Nahant Allen, 1916:120, 139;
True, 1904:268
15 Jan. 1909 Provincetown Allen, 1916,
plate 9, 119, 140
Spring 1910 Provincetown Allen, 1916:140
(1) The degree of certainty of our identification of the whales as
right whales was evaluated according to the following criteria: 1 =whale
was taken by shore whalers in 1725 or earlier; baleen at least 3 ft long
or considered worth saving; yield 40 bbl oil or more; whale clearly
identified as a balaenid by our source (any one of these criteria is
sufficient). 2=whale was taken after 1725; no definite evidence it was a
balaenid, but also no definite evidence that it was not. Drift whales
are classified as "2" unless some evidence was available to
identify them as right whales. "The Right Whale and less often the
Humpback, were the only species regularly hunted in our waters until the
introduction of more deadly apparatus than the hand harpoon, so that it
may usually be assumed that when `whales' are mentioned in the old
accounts as seen or pursued, the Right Whale is the species intended.
Especially is this the case, since Finbacks or Humpbacks are usually so
designated" (Allen, 1916, p. 132). No whale other than the bowhead
has baleen longer than 3 ft. Though large sperm whales often yielded
more than 40 barrels of oil, mysticetes other than balaenids rarely did,
particularly when only the blubber was tried out (see Mitchell and
Reeves, 1983, p. 188, for a discussion of humpback yields).
(2) Whalers were also hunting fin whales at this time.
Nantucket. Records given in Table 4 are principally from
Allen's (1916: 163-67) account of shore whaling at Nantucket,
derived largely from Macy (1835) and St. John de Crevecoeur (1782) for
the early years and from Allen's search of Nantucket newspapers;
Little's (1981, 1988) searches of archival documents; and our own
reexamination of some of their sources. A few of the records require
explanation.
Table 4.--Nantucket shore whaling
Right whales
Evidence of
Date whaling activity Seen Taken
1686 Possible sale of products
from drift whale by
Indians.
1691 Possible sale of products
from drift whale by
Indians.
1691-1695 Four whaling stations
active on S side.
1696-1719 [or 1731] Evidence of whaleboat
building and whaleboat
oar crafting on the
island.
1696-1733 Tools for whaling from
boats in blacksmith's
account book.
1702-1723 Shore whaling stations
active.
7th day, 11th month A "stunt." 1
1708
1709 Sloops with 2 whaleboats
each whaling on Nantucket
Shoals.
Winter 1710 A "cutter" paid for 1[?]
cutting blubber.
1711 A "dryskin," a 2-3
"yearling," and possibly
a third "fat" whale
taken.(3)
1712 First sperm whale
("Spermaseta") taken by
Nantucket whalers; taken
"accidentally some
distance south of
Nantucket."
Ca 1712 "Triing of 2 barills of 1[?]
fat whale."
1713 A "dryskin" and possibly 1-2
a second "fat" whale
taken.(3)
1714 Reference to "the first 1
whale."
1715 References to "the first 2
whail" and "the second
whail."
1715 15(est.)
1717 Reference to "whaleing 1(+?)
and fishing on this
shore"; reference to
"the vinyar whale"
(attributed to 1714 by
Little); "18 long bone
sold."
1718 Complaint by Indians
about their whaling
returns.
1718 Began whaling "out in the
deep."
1721 1
1724 2
1726 28 boat crews of 6 men 86
each.
1726 ca 27-30 "whale houses"
on Nantucket.
December 1727 A day's whaling trip. 1
1727 1
1728 At least 1 alongshore. 2
1728 At least 1 alongshore; 1 5
at Bowbell, Nantucket
Shoals.
February 1729 or Whaling voyage in
1730 whaleboat, Nantucket to
Martha's Vineyard.
1729 At least 1 at Bowbell; 1 2
in "ye deep."
1729 1 alongshore; 1 at 2
Bowbell.
1730 In "ye deep." 1
1730, winter Alongshore. 1
Late February 1731 "A whale day."
1731 2 in "ye deep"; 1 "went 2
to the bay."
1731 1
1732 Possibly 27 "companies"
whaling alongshore.
Spring 1732 In "ye deep." 1
1733 1 in "ye deep"; 1 at 2
Bowbell.
1734 At least 1 in "ye deep" 2
or at Bowbell.
1735 3 in "ye deep", 1 5
alongshore, 1 at Bowbell
(summer).
1736 One in summer. 2
1736 Alongshore. 1
1737 One in spring. 2
1737 2
Spring 1738 At least 1 at Bowbell. 2
Summer 1738 1
1739 1
Summer 1739 1
1740 1 in spring. 3
1741 At least 1 at Bowbell. 3
1742 At least 1 at Bowbell 3
(summer); 1 in fall.
1742 2
Spring 1743 1
1743 1
1744 At Bowbell. 1
Summer 1745 1
1746-1750 At least a "cow & calf" 2
taken.
1746 1
1747 At Bowbell. 1
1748 1
Spring 1749 1
1750 1 in winter. 2
1751 Sloop Ann. 2
1752 1
Spring 1754 1
1754 Alongshore. 1
1755 3
1755 1
Spring 1756 1
Winter 1757 1
1757 1
1758 1
1760 "Along-shore whaling
continued at Nantucket
until 1760." 28-30 max.
no. of shore whaleboats
at Nantucket.
1775 Whale houses and look-out
masts in place at
Siasconset.
No date (before 30 whaleboats at sea S
1792) of Nantucket.
3 May 1796 A floating sperm whale
found and towed by a
sloop to Nantucket; made
50 bbl body oil and 35
head; sold for $2,689.
10, 19 April 1800 One large and one small, + 3
31 and 16 barrels oil on
10 April 30 barrels oil
on 19 April.
Early June 1854 "A large humpback or 1
right whale" seen for
several days,
preparations made to
chase it.
10 November 1863 One whale seen, not 1
chased.
End November 1864 2 whales seen and chased. 2
April 1871 Found dead in the sound;
towed to Nantucket and
flensed.
1st week November Large (40 bbl) whale 1
1876 chased.
1 November 1877 A "large scrag whale" 1
seen.
Mid April 1886 Produced 125 barrels oil 4
and 1500-2000 lb baleen,
all told. One sank in 11
fathoms. Nantucket and
Tuckernuck (one towed to
New Bedford).
Late April to early May 1886 Up to 25 whales ca 25
seen near coast; chased by schooner Glide.
10 May 1686 1
1st week April 1891 "Several" seen. 2+
1-4 April 1897 "Several" seen and 2+
chased.
Ca 24 May 1913 S shore of Muskeget 2
Island.
Right
whales I.D.
Evidence of certain-
Date whaling activity Drift ty(1)
1686 Possible sale of products 1 2
from drift whale by
Indians.
1691 Possible sale of products 1 2
from drift whale by
Indians.
1691-1695 Four whaling stations
active on S side.
1696-1719 [or 1731] Evidence of whaleboat
building and whaleboat
oar crafting on the
island.
1696-1733 Tools for whaling from
boats in blacksmith's
account book.
1702-1723 Shore whaling stations
active.
7th day, 11th month A "stunt." 1
1708
1709 Sloops with 2 whaleboats
each whaling on Nantucket
Shoals.
Winter 1710 A "cutter" paid for
cutting blubber.
1711 A "dryskin," a 1
"yearling", and possibly
a third "fat" whale
taken.(3)
1712 First sperm whale
("Spermaseta") taken by
Nantucket whalers; taken
accidentally some
distance south of
Nantucket."
Ca 1712 "Triing of 2 barills of 1
fat whale."
1713 A "dryskin" and possibly 1
a second "fat" whale
taken.(3)
1714 Reference to "the first 1
whale."
1715 References to "the first 1
whail" and "the second
whail."
1715
1717 Reference to "whaleing 1
and fishing on this
shore"; reference to
"the vinyar whale"
(attributed to 1714 by
Little); "18 long bone
sold."
1718 Complaint by Indians
about their whaling
returns.
1718 Began whaling "out in the
deep."
1721 1
1724 1
1726 28 boat crews of 6 men 2
each.
1726 ca 27-30 "whale houses"
on Nantucket.
December 1727 A day's whaling trip. 2
1727 2
1728 At least 1 alongshore. 1
1728 At least 1 alongshore; 1 2
at Bowbell, Nantucket
Shoals.
February 1729 or Whaling voyage in
1730 whaleboat, Nantucket to
Martha's Vineyard.
1729 At least 1 at Bowbell; 1 2
in "ye deep."
1729 1 alongshore; 1 at
Bowbell.
1730 In "ye deep." 2
1730, winter Alongshore. 1
Late February 1731 "A whale day."
1731 2 in "ye deep"; 1 "went 1(?) 2
to the bay."
1731 1
1732 Possibly 27 "companies"
whaling alongshore.
Spring 1732 In "ye deep." 2
1733 1 in "ye deep"; 1 at 2
Bowbell.
1734 At least 1 in "ye deep" 2
or at Bowbell.
1735 3 in "ye deep", 1 2
alongshore, 1 at Bowbell
(summer).
1736 One in summer. 2
1736 Alongshore. 1
1737 One in spring. 2
1737 1
Spring 1738 At least 1 at Bowbell. 2
Summer 1738 2
1739 2
Summer 1739 2
1740 1 in spring. 2
1741 At least 1 at Bowbell. 2
1742 At least 1 at Bowbell 2
(summer); 1 in fall.
1742 1
Spring 1743 2
1743 1
1744 At Bowbell. 2
Summer 1745 2
1746-1750 At least a "cow & calf" 2
taken.
1746 2
1747 At Bowbell. 2
1748 2
Spring 1749 2
1750 1 in winter. 2
1751 Sloop Ann.
1752 2
Spring 1754 2
1754 Alongshore. 1
1755 2
1755 1
Spring 1756 2
Winter 1757 1
1757 2
1758 2
1760 "Along-shore whaling
continued at Nantucket
until 1760." 28-30 max.
no. of shore whaleboats
at Nantucket.
1775 Whale houses and look-out
masts in place at
Siasconset.
No date (before 30 whaleboats at sea S
1792) of Nantucket.
3 May 1796 A floating sperm whale
found and towed by a
sloop to Nantucket; made
50 bbl body oil and 35
head; sold for $2,689.
10, 19 April 1800 One large and one small, 1
31 and 16 barrels oil on
10 April 30 barrels oil
on 19 April.
Early June 1854 "A large humpback or 2
right whale" seen for
several days,
preparations made to
chase it.
10 November 1863 One whale seen, not 1
chased.
End November 1864 2 whales seen and chased. 1
April 1871 Found dead in the sound; 1 1
towed to Nantucket and
flensed.
1st week November Large (40 bbl) whale 1
1876 chased.
1 November 1877 A "large scrag whale" 2
seen.
Mid April 1886 Produced 125 barrels oil 1
and 1500-2000 lb baleen,
all told. One sank in 11
fathoms. Nantucket and
Tuckernuck (one towed to
New Bedford).
Late April to early May 1886 Up to 25 whales 1
seen near coast; chased by schooner Glide.
10 May 1686 1
1st week April 1891 "Several" seen. 1
1-4 April 1897 "Several" seen and 1
chased.
Ca 24 May 1913 S shore of Muskeget 1
Island.
Evidence of
Date whaling activity Source(2)
1686 Possible sale of products 1:32
from drift whale by
Indians.
1691 Possible sale of products 1:32
from drift whale by
Indians.
1691-1695 Four whaling stations 1:19, 22
active on S side.
1696-1719 [or 1731] Evidence of whaleboat 1:Tables 5, 6
building and whaleboat
oar crafting on the
island.
1696-1733 Tools for whaling from 1:Table 7
boats in blacksmith's
account book.
1702-1723 Shore whaling stations 1:25
active.
7th day, 11th month A "stunt." Blacksmith,
1708 1683-1738; also
see 1:11
1709 Sloops with 2 whaleboats 1:11-12
each whaling on Nantucket
Shoals.
Winter 1710 A "cutter" paid for 1:8
cutting blubber.
1711 A "dryskin," a 1:11, 75
"yearling", and possibly
a third "fat" whale
taken.(3)
1712 First sperm whale Blacksmith,
("Spermaseta") taken by 1683-1738; 1:12
Nantucket whalers; taken
accidentally some
distance south of
Nantucket."
Ca 1712 "Triing of 2 barills of 1:app. 10
fat whale."
1713 A "dryskin" and possibly 1:11, 75
a second "fat" whale
taken.(3)
1714 Reference to "the first Macy, 1707-1760
whale."
1715 References to "the first 1:app. 10, p. 76
whail" and "the second
whail."
1715 See text
1717 Reference to "whaleing
and fishing on this Macy, 1707-1760;
shore"; reference to 1:75-76
"the vinyar whale"
(attributed to 1714 by
Little); "18 long bone
sold."
1718 Complaint by Indians 1:70; Starbuck,
about their whaling 1924:143
returns.
1718 Began whaling "out in the 1:12
deep."
1721 3
1724 3
1726 28 boat crews of 6 men Starbuck, 1924:
each. 356; Macy, 1835:
31; Starbuck,
1878:22; 3
1726 ca 27-30 "whale houses" 1:25
on Nantucket.
December 1727 A day's whaling trip. 1:7, 70; 3
1727 1:32, app. 7; 3
1728 At least 1 alongshore. 3
1728 At least 1 alongshore; 1 3
at Bowbell, Nantucket
Shoals.
February 1729 or Whaling voyage in 1:7, 70
1730 whaleboat, Nantucket to
Martha's Vineyard.
1729 At least 1 at Bowbell; 1 3
in "ye deep."
1729 1 alongshore; 1 at 3
Bowbell.
1730 In "ye deep." 3
1730, winter Alongshore. 3
Late February 1731 "A whale day." 1:7-8
1731 2 in "ye deep"; 1 "went 3
to the bay."
1731 3
1732 Possibly 27 "companies" 1:33, app, 2
whaling alongshore.
Spring 1732 In "ye deep." 3
1733 1 in "ye deep"; 1 at 3
Bowbell.
1734 At least 1 in "ye deep" 3
or at Bowbell.
1735 3 in "ye deep", 1 3
alongshore, 1 at Bowbell
(summer).
1736 One in summer. 3
1736 Alongshore. 3
1737 One in spring. 3
1737 3
Spring 1738 At least 1 at Bowbell. 3
Summer 1738 3
1739 3
Summer 1739 3
1740 1 in spring. 3
1741 At least 1 at Bowbell. 3
1742 At least 1 at Bowbell 3
(summer); 1 in fall.
1742 3
Spring 1743 3
1743 3
1744 At Bowbell. 3
Summer 1745 3
1746-1750 At least a "cow & calf" 1:16
taken.
1746 3
1747 At Bowbell. 3
1748 3
Spring 1749 3
1750 1 in winter. 3
1751 Sloop Ann. 3
1752 3
Spring 1754 3
1754 Alongshore. 3
1755 3
1755 3
Spring 1756 3
Winter 1757 3
1757 3
1758 3
1760 "Along-shore whaling 1:15-16
continued at Nantucket
until 1760." 28-30 max.
no. of shore whaleboats
at Nantucket.
1775 Whale houses and look-out 1:18
masts in place at
Siasconset.
No date (before 30 whaleboats at sea S 1:8
1792) of Nantucket.
3 May 1796 A floating sperm whale N.B. Medley, 6
found and towed by a and 20 May 1796
sloop to Nantucket; made
50 bbl body oil and 35
head; sold for $2,689.
10, 19 April 1800 One large and one small, Macy, 1835:
31 and 16 barrels oil on 150-151; Allen,
10 April 30 barrels oil 1916:129, 134
on 19 April.
Early June 1854 "A large humpback or The Whaleman,
right whale" seen for New Bedford, 9
several days, June 1854; WSL
preparations made to 12(15): 13 June
chase it. 1854
10 November 1863 One whale seen, not 2:137
chased.
End November 1864 2 whales seen and chased. 2:137
April 1871 Found dead in the sound; Stackpole, 1982
towed to Nantucket and
flensed.
1st week November Large (40 bbl) whale 2:137-138
1876 chased.
1 November 1877 A "large scrag whale" 2:138
seen.
Mid April 1886 Produced 125 barrels oil 2:126-128, 138,
and 1500-2000 lb baleen, 171; WSL 44(13):
all told. One sank in 11 4 May 1886;
fathoms. Nantucket and Stackpole, 1982
Tuckernuck (one towed to
New Bedford).
Late April to early May 1886 Up to 25 whales 2:138
seen near coast; chased by schooner Glide.
10 May 1686 2:138
1st week April 1891 "Several" seen. 2:139
1-4 April 1897 "Several" seen and 2:139-140
chased.
Ca 24 May 1913 S shore of Muskeget 2:140
Island.
(1) The certainty of our identification of the whales as right
whales was evaluated according to the following criteria: 1=whale was
taken by shore whalers in 1725 or earlier; baleen at least 3 ft long or
considered worth saving; yield 40 barrels oil or more; whale clearly
identified as a balaenid by our source (any one of these criteria is
sufficient). 2=whale was taken after 1725; no definite evidence it was a
balaenid, but also no definite evidence that it was not. See Table 3,
footnote 1.
(2) 1 = Little (1981), 2 = G. M. Allen (1916), 3 = Little (1988).
(3) Little (1981, e.g.p. 11) interpreted the listing "... fat
whale ..." in the account books she examined to refer to
"fat" whales taken. However, we suspect that in the context it
may have meant "whale fat." Thus, it should not necessarily be
interpreted as evidence that an additional whale was caught.
The people of New England chafed under the British colonial
administration's policies toward whaling and the disposal of whale
products (Collect. Mass. Hist. Soc., Ser. 5, VI). Their complaints in
the first decade of the 18th century resembled and coincided with those
of the Long Island whalers against the latter's colonial government
(Reeves and Mitchell 1986a; also see below).
Post-1725 Shore Whaling (1726-1799) (Fig. 9). By all accounts,
shore whaling for right whales had passed its peak by about 1725. The
whale catch at Cape Cod was poor in the winter of 1726-27, as it had
been for several years previously. The residents had some recent
success, however, in hunting whales from larger vessels, and they were
poised to resume this offshore whaling in spring 1727 (Smith, 1922:71).
In March 1729, whalers were working out of Duxbury and Plymouth (Winsor,
1849:350), probably hunting right whales in Cape Cod Bay. In 1739 the
people of Provincetown regarded their winter's catch of 7 or 8
whales as inadequate, and the principal whaling families made plans to
move to Casco Bay, Maine (Smith, 1922:247). In 1746 only three or four
whales were taken at Cape Cod, and Douglass (1760:59) believed the
nearshore grounds were fished out.
[Figure 9 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Nineteenth Century Shore Whaling (Fig. 10). Despite their scarcity
close to the coast, right whales continued to be pursued at every
opportunity. For example, Charles W. Morgan (1841) of New Bedford noted
in his diary on 13 May 1841: "Went to Westport Point in company
with many others to see two whales which had been caught off there day
before. They were cutting one in - about 48 ft. long and will make about
40 bbls of oil (right whale). It was a curious sight and quantities of
people were present from N. Bedford and surrounding country. The other
was much smaller, perhaps 20 bbls." These two whales were also
mentioned in the New Bedford newspapers (New-Bedford Mercury, 34(46), 14
May 1841), and in the 12 May entry of Samuel Rodman's diary (Pease,
1927:220).
[Figure 10 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Referring to Provincetown, Freeman (1862:623) wrote: "Even
now, if peradventure one [whale] occasionally shows itself within the
range of the practised sight of a seaman, no objection is made to the
vicinage of the game, and it is almost sure to be `brought to' by
the unerring harpoon of the expert." He added that the occasional
sighting of a whale "of the larger kind" in Barnstable Bay,
Wellfleet Bay, or Provincetown Harbor was "the signal for sport
that is generally successful" (Freeman, 1862:655). Pelagic whaling
vessels were sometimes delayed from departing Provincetown when their
masters received news that whales had been sighted near Race Point (e.g.
the R. E. Cook and Seychelle, April 1853, Whalemen's Shipping List
11(8), 26 April 1853; the Rienzi, June 1857, Whalemen's Shipping
List 15(15), 23 June 1857).
Captain N. E. Atwood of Provincetown stated during the 1860's
that right whales were taken there occasionally but that their
appearance had been more reguular in the past (Allen, 1869:202-203). Two
or three right whales were killed near Provincetown between 1867 and
1884 (Goode, 1884:24). However, the only specific Provincetown record
that we found for this period refers to a mother, accompanied by a calf,
that was lanced but not secured in March 1870 (Allen, 1916:137).
An intensive hunt for balaenopterids (almost entirely fin and
humpback whales), involving steam-powered vessels and explosive
harpoons, took place in Cape Cod and Massachusetts Bays and in the Gulf
of Maine during 1865-95 (Clark, 1887:41-48; Allen, 1916; Mitchell and
Reeves, 1983; Reeves and Barto, 1985). A close lookout would have been
kept for right whales, and any seen would have been chased.
Martha's Vineyard. Allen (1908:314) claimed that whaling began
at Martha's Vineyard in 1652 (Allen, 1916:167-68 provides more on
early whaling and drift whale salvaging operations). The practice of
including claims to products from drift whales with the title to land
(Banks, 1966a:55) apparently grew out of purchase agreements made with
Indians as early as 1658 (Banks, 1966b:432). Items listed in personal
inventories in the late 1660's (e.g. barrels of oil, "great
kittells", and a large "iron pot") indicate that Vineyard
residents were processing whale products at that time. Try houses (for
rendering whale blubber into oil) were present at Holmes Hole
"quite early" and at the Butler homestead before 1748 (Banks,
1966b:432-433).
John Butler and Thomas Lothrop, the first Vineyard whalers on
record, killed three whales in February 1703 (Banks, 1966b:434). Butler,
at least, had been engaged in whaling for a considerable time before
then. In 1724 a Vineyard man made a joint whaling expedition in
Barnstable Bay with a man from Barnstable (Banks, 1966b:435). Shore
whaling continued at Martha's Vineyard through at least the first
quarter of the 19th century (Table 3).
According to Macy (1835:31; and see Little, 1988), shore whaling
continued at Nantucket until about 1760, after which time whales were
taken by boats from shore "only occasionally." Most of the
whales taken by these boats were said to have been right whales
(Shearman, 1876).
In 1715, six sloops whaling from Nantucket produced 600 barrels of
oil and 11,000 lb of baleen (Macy, quoted in Collect. Mass. Hist. Soc.,
Ser. 1, 3:161) worth 1,100 [pounds sterling] sterling (Macy, 1835:37).
Because long-distance whaling cruises on large vessels had not yet
become commonplace for the colonists (the sloop voyages lasted no longer
than about 6 weeks, according to Macy, 1835:37), and shore whaling for
right whales was still a rewarding enterprise at the time, we believe
that the returns listed came primarily from right whales. Some of the
oil could have been from sperm whales, Physeter macrocephalus. The first
sperm whale taken at sea by the Nantucket whalers supposedly was killed
in about 1712 (Macy, 1835:32), but sperm whales were known from the
Massachusetts coast much earlier (Josselyn, 1672, 1833). Mary
Starbuck's account book refers to spermaceti, a product obtained
only from sperm whales, in connection with a voyage in 1729 (Little,
1988). Nevertheless, it appears that sperm whales were not commonly
taken in the early years of sloop whaling when effort centered on
Nantucket Shoals (Little, 1988). Oil and baleen from bow-heads also
could have been included in the returns. However, although Starbuck
(1878:168) referred to one New England whaling voyage to Davis Strait
(as far as lat. 66 [degrees] N) in 1732, Nantucket vessels did not
regularly begin visiting the northern regions where bowheads would have
been a primary target until about 1746 (Macy, 1835:54). The earliest
catch of a whale at Greenland, possibly a bowhead, mentioned in Mary
Starbuck's account book was in 1737-38 (Little, 1988). If all
11,000 lb of baleen produced in 1715 did come from right whales, then an
average yield of 657 lb per whale would indicate a secured catch of
about 17 animals.
Starbuck (1878:168) surmised that the 1715 effort and catch by the
Nantucket sloops was "probably for some years pretty
constant." They certainly continued to catch right whales and sperm
whales east of the Grand Bank and elsewhere through at least the
1760's (Fonda, 1969; Reeves and Mitchell, 1986b; Table 5). Some of
the oil (and presumably baleen as well) secured by Nantucket sloops in
Newfoundland was exported directly to England without having passed
through a New England port (E. A. Little in litt., 17 August 1991; see
below).
Table 5.--Catches reported by Little (1988) for Nan-tucket whalers
at grounds in the Northwest Atlantic north of New England.
No. of I.D.
Date Place right whales certainty(1)
1733 Canso 1 2
Sept. 1735 Canso 1 1
Spring 1736 Canso 1 2
1737 Greenland 1 2
Summer 1738 Newfoundland 1 2
1741 Newfoundland 1 2
1743 Newfoundland 1 2
1747 Newfoundland 1 2
1753 Carolina 1 1
1754 Newfoundland 1 2
(1) According to the following: 1 = almost certainly a right whale
because baleen was saved and the latitude is outside the bowhead's
range; 2 = probably a right whale, but could be sperm, humpback, or
bowhead.
Occasionally, pelagic whaling vessels in port put to sea off
Nantucket in pursuit of whales sighted near the island (e.g. mid-May
1827, the brig Quito [Nantucket Inquirer, 26 May 1827]; several vessels
in April 1847 [Nantucket Inquirer, 21 Apr. 1847]). Smaller vessels
continued to make short cruises to Nantucket Shoals during the heyday of
Nantucket's distant-water whaling (e.g. 6-10 Sept. 1825 by the
sloop Sarah Porter [Nantucket Inquirer, 12 Sept. 1825]; Mitchell and
Reeves, 1983).
An article entitled "The Whaling Business at Nantucket"
appeared in The Corrector, Sag Harbor, 19 June 1852: "The recent
close approach of whales to the island which has so thinned their ranks,
has started `off-shore fishermen', and three ripe schooners are now
fitting for the service. This is the old business of Nantucket over
again. May it prove profitable and acceptable." One of these
schooners was the Hamilton, which sailed 12 June to cruise on the shoals
(The Corrector, Sag Harbor, N.Y., 26 June 1852, from "New Bedford
Shipping List"). The Hamilton took six humpbacks and struck but
lost five more during the first 3 weeks of August 1852 on Nantucket
Shoals (Allen, 1916:137). It is unclear whether right whales were among
those whales that appeared off the Nantucket coast in the early
1850's. However, the occurrence of a group of right whales off
Tuckernuck in April 1886, three of which were caught (a fourth was lost
but later found dead and towed to New Bedford), was discussed by Allen
(1916:138) and again by Stackpole (1982). The latter gave the year as
1887 (incorrectly: see Nantucket Inquirer and Whalemen's Shipping
List).
Rhode Island
Allen (1916:168-170) found relatively little evidence of early
shore whaling in present-day Rhode Island although bounties were being
offered on whale oil and baleen in 1751. Such bounties had, in fact,
already been offered on these commodities as early as 1731 (Arnold,
1860:103; Potter and Rider, 1880:31-32). The bounties were renewed for
10 years in 1738 but repealed in 1745 (Preston, 1932:28). During
1733-38, bounties were paid on 1,211 barrels of whale oil and 3,843 lb
of baleen (equivalent to about 6 right whales at 657 lb of baleen per
whale). By this time, some of the oil could have come from sperm whales
and some of the oil and baleen from bowheads taken in cruises to the
north. The sloop Pelican sailed from Newport in 1733 and returned with
114 barrels of oil and 200 lb of baleen (Arnold, 1860:110). Although the
Pelican has been described as Rhode Island's "first regularly
equipped" whaling vessel (Arnold, 1860:110), a vessel from Rhode
Island took a large sperm whale in May 1723 (Starbuck, 1878:168).
The coastal Indians of Rhode Island had a tradition of using the
products of drift whales (Arnold, 1859:85). Also, according to Arnold,
whales were taken "often" with boats in Narragansett Bay
before about 1750. The description of a whale's being taken off
Narragansett Bay in March 1662 (Sporri, 1677; Bridenbaugh, 1974, app.
V:144-45), "among the earliest accounts of fastening to a whale
with a whaleboat in colonial America" (Kugler, 1980:8n), lends
credence to Arnold's claim. The Narragansett Bay whalers attacked
the whale in two boats, each carrying a crew of six or seven men, using
the established European (Basque) technique of fastening to the whale
with a harpoon and line. The March 1662 whale was definitely a right
whale, judging by Sporri's (1677) description: "This fish was
fifty-five feet long and sixteen feet high; it had only two fins; the
tail was broad. Its blubber was two feet thick.... The teeth, which are
as much as six feet long and saw-like, are the whale-bone which is
shipped to us [in Holland]" (Bridenbaugh, 1974:145).
The inventories of possessions of Rhode Island residents during the
early 1700's occasionally included quantities of baleen (e.g.
Rogers et al., 1894a:249; 1894b:119). Rhode Island merchant vessels
sometimes carried oil to the West Indies (e.g. in 1723--Preston,
1932:26), but much of it could have been the result of "previous
trading with neighboring colonies" (Preston, 1932:28). The Rhode
Island General Treasurer's accounts for 1723 indicate payment of
171 [pounds sterling] for 433 lb of baleen and 2 tons of oil (Preston,
1932:28).
Allen's (1916:135) record of a right whale killed "off
Providence" in 1828 (his source was the Nantucket Inquirer of 1
March 1828, not 22 February as given) can be further described from
information in The Gazette, New London, Conn., 27 February 1828 (citing
The Cadet of Providence; also see Clark, 1887:48). The whale, "of
the largest size," was chased by four whale boats (Fig. 11) and
harpooned twice on 18 February. It was finally killed near Newport the
next day by Captain Potter of Newport. This whale probably was the one
seen near Providence lighthouse "some weeks since." Cope
(1865, 1866) referred to the periotic bones of a large right whale from
Newport, but he gave no further details to indicate whether this was a
different specimen from that taken in 1828.
[Figure 11 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Connecticut
More shore whaling was probably conducted in Connecticut than is
suggested by Allen's (1916:170) brief account. One company was
offered a monopoly on whaling by the Connecticut General Court in 1647
(Trumbull, 1850:154), but we found no evidence of their taking up this
often Caulkins (1895:638) understood the listing of a whale boat in an
enumeration of goods to imply that "excursions were sometimes made
in pursuit of whales" during the late 17th and early 18th
centuries. Two early diaries kept by Connecticut residents show that
Caulkins was right. Comfort Davise rented Joshua Hempstead's whale
boat "to go a whaling" at Fishers Island between 13 January
and 20 February 1718 (Hempstead, 1901:72). Manasseh Minor, a Stonington
farmer, may not have participated directly in whaling himself, but he
reported the activities of whalers in his diary kept from 1696 to 1720
(Miner and Miner, 1915; our Table 6). At least five of his acquaintances
were whalers. Some (Robin, Abnar, Pelig, and Abel) apparently were
local; others (Sam Hand and associates) were from elsewhere, perhaps
Long Island. At least three whales were taken on the Connecticut coast
in early 1703 and one in March 1705.
Table 6.--Entries referring to whales or whaling in Manasseh
Minor's diary, 1696-1720 (Miner and Miner, 1915). Entries are
direct quotations.
Date Entry Diary page
3 December 1697 Robin Abnar and pelig 26
went a whalin.
17 October 1698 I went to fishars island 31
for oyle.
14 December 1702 Abell went a whaling. 57
24 February 1703 Sam hand & Company cam hear. 59
25 February 1703 the whale brak their boat. 59
3 March 1703 ... a whale broght on shore. 59
4 March 1703 ... the boat lanched. 59
5 March 1703 wee went to see the whale. 59
10 March 1703 a whale at wadawanvk. 59
16 March 1703 Abel came from whaling. 59
22 March 1703 Samvel hand came a whaling. 59
23 March 1703 killed 3 whals amongst them.... 59
27 March 1703 Sam hand went to cut his 59
great whale....
4 March 1705 ... a whal killed. 75
8 March 1705 I sold one barill of sider 75
to the whalmen....
4 August 1706 wee feched the whal boat.... 94
14 August 1706 we went to fishas island 94
in a whal boat.
22 April 1709 I feched the whal boat home. 115
21 December 1714 I brought oyle from SC. 120
These data substantiate the comment by Hurd (1882:677; reiterated
by Wheeler, 1900:131) that as early as 1701, and for some time
thereafter, whales were taken and brought ashore at Wadawanuck
(Stonington Point). The oil was exported to Boston and the West Indies.
A sloop was fitted out for whaling from New London in 1718 (Colby,
1990).
Some whaling took place in Long Island Sound during the 19th
century. Reeves and Mitchell (1986a) listed several sightings and
catches of right whales (and a sperm whale) in Long Island Sound, and
additional records are given in Table 7. A whale seen for several days
in New Haven harbor the first week of April 1824 was pursued by some
"enterprising seamen" (Nantucket Inquirer, 12 Apr. 1824), but
the "idle harpooners passing away their winter in New London"
did not chase the two large whales seen between New London lighthouse
and Fishers Island, late January 1835 (Nantucket Inquirer, 4 Feb. 1835).
The reported capture of a "young" 60 ft whale in New Haven
harbor, May 1834 (Watson, 1855, 2:429) may have been a hoax (Sag Harbor
Corrector 13[5], 24 May 1834; Nantucket Inquirer, 10 May 1834, quoting
from the New Haven Herald).
A 27-barrel right whale was taken off Stonington in about 1840, and
another in the same group was killed and towed to Montauk, New York
(Linsley, 1842:352n; both noted by Reeves and Mitchell, 1986a: their
Table 1).
New York (Long Island)
Reeves and Mitchell (1986a) reconstructed much of the history of
right whale hunting on the Long Island coast (Fig. 12). Here we present
some additional information and data (Table 7). In reconstructing the
catch, we have tried to avoid double-counting and thus have not
generally included in the tables for the present paper those catches
that were included in the tables of Reeves and Mitchell (1986a). The few
records that are repeated are so designated.
[Figure 12 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
One of the earliest specific references to a Long Island whaling
company concerns the fitting out of a small vessel by John Ogden in
1658, apparently at Southampton (Ross, 1902:871). In addition to
Southampton and Easthampton, which definitely had whaling companies as
early as 1650 and 1651, respectively, Southold, on Long Island Sound,
had one in 1652 (Ross, 1902:872). Colonial correspondence with the
London Board of Trade (C.O. 5, 1051, 26i; Public Record Office, Kew,
Lond.) confirms that by 1664 Long Island residents were killing whales
at sea. One individual claimed to have begun whaling in about 1666 and
to have continued into the early 1700's. During this time,
"the captors had good success, Laded several vessels with oyle and
whale bone for this Kingdom [England] to purchase the manufacture of the
same" (C.O. 5, 1051, 31iii; Public Record Office, Kew, Lond.).
Reeves and Mitchell (1986a) noted that at least 14 whaling
companies were active in 1687 from Quogue (or Ketchaponack) east. R.M.
Bayles (in Ross, 1902:872) listed 18 companies in 1690 from Mastic east.
In 1699, Col. Smith, whose whaling company was based at Mastic, reported
that he had cleared 500 [pounds sterling] sterling in a single year
(Bayles, in Ross, 1902:873).
In 1726, 11 whales were killed at Southampton; six of them yielded
220 barrels of oil and 1,500 lb of baleen (Bayles, in Ross, 1902:873).
This record was attributed to the season 1732-33 by Reeves and Mitchell
(1986a, their Table 1). Samuel Mulford obtained some whale oil and
baleen without a license late in 1705 (Headlam, 1930: 159), and this
corroborates the evidence for a whale's being taken that year
according to information in Mulford's diary (Reeves and Mitchell
1986a). Eight whaling licenses were issued in New York in 1705-09
(Headlam, 1930: 159).
A statement to the British Council of Trade and Plantations in 1717
indicated that "imports of whale oil and bone [baleen] from New
York have greatly decreased, owing to disputes with the Governor as to a
duty demanded for whales catched there" (Headlam, 1930:16). This
belief, however, was disputed by Governor Hunter, who claimed that the
whaling effort was constant or increasing on Long Island. The
difference, according to Hunter, was that the products were being sold
and exported from Boston rather than New York.
Reeves and Mitchell (1986a) failed to note that, according to
Edwards and Rattray (1932:232), the whaling station at Smith's
Point alone averaged 20 whales per winter during the early 18th century.
Reeves and Mitchell (1986a) estimated that 20-30 whales were taken per
year in the entire Long Island fishery between 1700 and 1725.
Reeves and Mitchell (1986a) had little evidence of shore whaling on
Long Island at the end of the 18th century and beginning of the 19th.
They presented no catch data from 1784, when the schooner Eagle cruised
along the south shore, to about 1815, when whaling definitely was being
conducted. However, some whales were taken on the south coast of Long
Island in the winter of 1801-02, and after being "much
neglected," the whale fishery had "considerably
increased" (Starr, 1876:72n).
Some whaling was conducted by the people of Staten Island. On 13
December 1705 a license was issued to Thomas Jones to take drift whales
"on the gut joining Mr. Nicoll's land and the west end of
Gravesend beach" (Leng and Davis, 1930, II:990). An unspecified
quantity of oil and baleen was taken on or prior to 26 March 1711
"on Mereck beach, Rockaway beach and at Nicoll's beach"
(Leng and Davis, 1930, II; also see Reeves and Mitchell, 1986a, their
Table 1). Sometime in the spring of 1730 (before 9 April), Adam Mott,
Joseph Carman, and company of Staten Island petitioned for the oil and
baleen of a whale "wounded by them in the bay of New York, and
afterwards cast ashore at Cape May" (Leng and Davis, 1930, II:991).
Judging by the year, season, and locality, and the fact that baleen was
at issue, this was probably a right whale. The Staten Island Whaling
Company, which was active during the 1830's, apparently was
concerned with pelagic whaling rather than shore whaling (Freedman et
al., 1975).
A sloop sailed out of Moriches on the south coast of Long Island
for whaling between Fire Island and Coney Island in 1831. It cruised
daily for 40 days, sheltering each night at either Fire Island or Coney
Island. One whale was sighted, but it was a finback, "a kind too
lively to land with harpoons and lines" (Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 20
Aug. 1899:12).
Reeves and Mitchell (1986a) mentioned that they had no evidence of
schooners whaling along the coast of Long Island after the 1850's.
However, Weiss et al. (1974:110) referred to a 40-barrel whale, worth
$2,000, taken by two schooners off that coast in March 1860. The vessels
had been whaling between New Jersey and Long Island for a month. It is
likely that this was a right whale, considering the month and locality
of capture and the great value of the whale in spite of its modest oil
yield. A balaenid baleen plate 71.5 inches long scrimshawed with a
panoramic view of what is thought to be Long Island Sound may be from
mid 19th century Long Island whaling (Ball, 1994:95).
An East Bay sloop, the Branch, cruised for "whales,
leatherback turtles, sea serpents, devilfish, etc." between East
Moriches and Gravesend Bay during August and (possibly) September 1899
(Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 20 Aug. 1899:12). We have no information on
sightings or catches.
New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania
Shore whaling in areas south of Long Island began in the first half
of the 17th century, and some whaling was still being conducted as
recently as the late 19th century (Table 8). The Dutch were probably the
first Europeans to hunt whales in and near Delaware Bay, although the
bay had been discovered and named (St. Christopher's Bay) by the
Spanish in 1525. A Dutch colony (called Swanendael) was established near
Cape Henlopen in 1631 for the express purpose of whaling (Parr,
1969:108-114). After reviewing the information provided by van der Donck
(1841) and De Vries (1853), Mead and Mitchell (1984:37) concluded that
the whales hunted in Delaware Bay "may not have been right
whales." Although some may have been gray whales, Eschrichtius
robustus, as implied by Mead and Mitchell (1984), right whales were
certainly taken (Table 8). Delaware Bay has been visited by right whales
at least occasionally in recent years (Ulmer, 1961; Hamilton, 1995).
Table 8.--Records of right whales from the coasts of Delaware,
Pennsylvania, and New Jersey.
Whales
Struck/
Date Locality Seen Taken lost
5 Dec. 1632 Near Cape Hinlopen 1
1-2 Jan. 1633 Well inside 3
Delaware Bay
1 Jan.-end of Delaware Bay 7 10
March 1633
1646 North River 2
1668-1671 Navesink
Ca. 1683 Mouth of 11
Delaware Bay
1684 Near mouth of 9 3
Delaware Bay
1685 Delaware Bay 1
1688 Delaware River up 1
as far as Trenton
Falls
Winter 1693-1694 Cape May 8
Winter 1695-1696 Cape May 2
Winter 1696-1697 Cape May +
Winter 1717-1718 Cape May 6
Egg Harbor 12
1730 North of Cape May 1
April 1733 Delaware River
near Philadelphia
February 1736 Cape May 2
Ca. April 1742 Eastward of 2
Cape May
February 1744 Sandy Hook 1[?]
March 1752 Briganteen Beach 2
Spring 1753 Cape May 6
February-April Pecks Beach 3+
1756
March-April 1757 Five Mile Beach, 2+
Cape May Co.
February-March Absecon 2+
1759
April 1764 Townsend's Inlet 2+ 1 1
February Pecks Beach "Plenty" 4
[and later] 1765 (Ocean City),
Ludlam's Beach
(Cape May Co.)
January 1766 Pecks Beach +
1766 "Below the Narrows
on the east side"
September 1766 Coney Island 1
1782 Manasquan Beach 1
1792 Absecon Beach 1
1803 Absecon Bar 1
1809 Delaware River 1
near Chester, Pa.
1813 Absecon Beach 1
November 1814 Delaware River 1
just below Trenton
Bridge
6 May 1820 Sandy Hook 1
13 May 1820 Sandy Hook 1
20 May 1820 Sandy Hook(?) 1
1824 Near Bayonne, N.J.
End of Cape May
March 1825
8 November 1861 Delaware River 1
near Richmond
1862 Delaware River 1
near Philadelphia
Ca. 1864-1865 Raritan Bay 1[?]
30 May 1874 Raritan River near 1
Sayreville
Ca. 10 May 1878 Long Branch 1
Spring 1882 Near Egg Harbor 1
1900-1910 Asbury Park
Whales I.D.
certainty
Date Locality Chased Drift (1)
5 Dec. 1632 Near Cape Hinlopen 2
1-2 Jan. 1633 Well inside 2
Delaware Bay
1 Jan.-end of Delaware Bay 1
March 1633
1646 North River 1
1668-1671 Navesink 1 1
Ca. 1683 Mouth of 1
Delaware Bay
1684 Near mouth of 1
Delaware Bay
1685 Delaware Bay 1
1688 Delaware River up 2
as far as Trenton
Falls
Winter 1693-1694 Cape May 1
Winter 1695-1696 Cape May 1
Winter 1696-1697 Cape May 1
Winter 1717-1718 Cape May 1
Egg Harbor 1
1730 North of Cape May 2
April 1733 Delaware River 2 2
near Philadelphia
February 1736 Cape May 2
Ca. April 1742 Eastward of 1
Cape May
February 1744 Sandy Hook 2
March 1752 Briganteen Beach 1
Spring 1753 Cape May 2
February-April Pecks Beach 2
1756
March-April 1757 Five Mile Beach, 2
Cape May Co.
February-March Absecon 2
1759
April 1764 Townsend's Inlet 2+ 1
February Pecks Beach 2
[and later] 1765 (Ocean City),
Ludlam's Beach
(Cape May Co.)
January 1766 Pecks Beach 2
1766 "Below the Narrows 1 2
on the east side"
September 1766 Coney Island 2
1782 Manasquan Beach 2
1792 Absecon Beach 2
1803 Absecon Bar 1
1809 Delaware River 2
near Chester, Pa.
1813 Absecon Beach 1 2
November 1814 Delaware River 1
just below Trenton
Bridge
6 May 1820 Sandy Hook 2
13 May 1820 Sandy Hook 1
20 May 1820 Sandy Hook(?) 2
1824 Near Bayonne, N.J. 1 2
End of Cape May + 2
March 1825
8 November 1861 Delaware River 2
near Richmond
1862 Delaware River 1
near Philadelphia
Ca. 1864-1865 Raritan Bay 1
30 May 1874 Raritan River near 1
Sayreville
Ca. 10 May 1878 Long Branch 1
Spring 1882 Near Egg Harbor 1
1900-1910 Asbury Park 1 2
Date Locality Comments
5 Dec. 1632 Near Cape Hinlopen
1-2 Jan. 1633 Well inside
Delaware Bay
1 Jan.-end of Delaware Bay 32 barrels of oil;
March 1633 the 7 secured whales
were the smallest of
those struck.
1646 North River 1 "grounded on an
island."
1668-1671 Navesink 1 whale "cast ashore" and
"delivered to" a whaling
company
Ca. 1683 Mouth of
Delaware Bay
1684 Near mouth of All before 4 April.
Delaware Bay
1685 Delaware Bay
1688 Delaware River up
as far as Trenton
Falls
Winter 1693-1694 Cape May
Winter 1695-1696 Cape May "Old cow and calf."
Winter 1696-1697 Cape May "Made a great voyage."
Winter 1717-1718 Cape May
Egg Harbor
1730 North of Cape May "Cow" whale, 50 ft long,
stranded, apparently
killed by local whalers.
April 1733 Delaware River Cow and calf.
near Philadelphia
February 1736 Cape May 40 barrels of oil.
Ca. April 1742 Eastward of Ca. 4 1/2 ft bone,
Cape May near 7 ft bone.
February 1744 Sandy Hook 36 ft long,
tail 10 ft broad.
March 1752 Briganteen Beach 1 a yearling, 1 a stunt.
Spring 1753 Cape May
February-April Pecks Beach
1756
March-April 1757 Five Mile Beach,
Cape May Co.
February-March Absecon
1759
April 1764 Townsend's Inlet Secured whale sank and
was recovered 2 days
later; 23 barrels oil,
230 lbs bone,
4ft 8 in. long.
February Pecks Beach
[and later] 1765 (Ocean City),
Ludlam's Beach
(Cape May Co.)
January 1766 Pecks Beach
1766 "Below the Narrows Cast ashore, 49 ft long.
on the east side"
September 1766 Coney Island 40 ft long, 70 barrels
oil (expected); taken by
2 men from Elizabethtown,
N.J., at Coney Island,
N.Y.
1782 Manasquan Beach Found dead 15 Sept. with
harpoon in carcass.
1792 Absecon Beach Washed ashore at Absecon
bearing 2-3 harpoons.
1803 Absecon Bar Stranded on Absecon Bar;
had been struck and lost
by Long Beach Island
whalers.
1809 Delaware River
near Chester, Pa.
1813 Absecon Beach Dead whale floated
ashore.
November 1814 Delaware River 22 ft long,
just below Trenton 1 ft 8 in. baleen.
Bridge
6 May 1820 Sandy Hook
13 May 1820 Sandy Hook
20 May 1820 Sandy Hook(?) Washed ashore in Long
Island Sound, thought to
have been harpooned
earlier off Sandy Hook.
1824 Near Bayonne, N.J. Washed ashore on 7 April,
52 ft or 58 ft long.
End of Cape May
March 1825
8 November 1861 Delaware River Swimming downstream.
near Richmond
1862 Delaware River 37 ft.
near Philadelphia
Ca. 1864-1865 Raritan Bay
30 May 1874 Raritan River near 48 ft (or 42 ft),
Sayreville 4 ft baleen
Ca. 10 May 1878 Long Branch "A Greenland whale";
42 ft, expected to
produce 60 bbls oil.
Spring 1882 Near Egg Harbor "Shot with a rifle,
hacked with an axe,
and at last killed with
a harpoon"; 48 ft,
female.
1900-1910 Asbury Park "Enormous whale was
washed ashore."
Date Locality Sources
5 Dec. 1632 Near Cape Hinlopen Parr, 1969:118.
1-2 Jan. 1633 Well inside Parr, 1969:125.
Delaware Bay
1 Jan.-end of Delaware Bay Parr, 1969:127, 130.
March 1633
1646 North River Weiss et al., 1974:103.
1668-1671 Navesink Weiss et al., 1974:16.
Ca. 1683 Mouth of Watson, 1855,
Delaware Bay vol.2, p. 428.
1684 Near mouth of Weiss et al., 1974:15.
Delaware Bay
1685 Delaware Bay Lipton, 1975:11;
Weiss et al., 1974:24.
1688 Delaware River up Watson, 1855,
as far as Trenton vol. 2, p. 428.
Falls
Winter 1693-1694 Cape May Beesley, 1857:175-176.
Winter 1695-1696 Cape May Beesley, 1857:175-176.
Winter 1696-1697 Cape May Beesley, 1857:175-176.
Winter 1717-1718 Cape May Weiss et al., 1974:22, 34
Egg Harbor [The Boston Newsletter,
24 March 1718].
1730 North of Cape May Watson, 1855,
vol. 2, p. 429.
April 1733 Delaware River Watson, 1855,
near Philadelphia vol. 2, p. 429.
February 1736 Cape May Watson, 1855,
vol. 2, p. 429.
Ca. April 1742 Eastward of Lipton, 1975:17 [Boston
Cape May Gazette or Weekly Journal
of May 11, 1742];
Weiss et al., 1974:22.
February 1744 Sandy Hook Weiss et al.,
1974, p. 104
[This Old Monmouth
of Ours, W.S. Horner,
Freehold. 1932].
March 1752 Briganteen Beach Table 9.
Spring 1753 Cape May Weiss et al., 1974:22
[Sarah A. Thomas.
Cape May Co. Mag. Hist.
And Geneal.,
June 1950, p. 118].
February-April Pecks Beach Table 9.
1756
March-April 1757 Five Mile Beach, Table 9.
Cape May Co.
February-March Absecon Table 9.
1759
April 1764 Townsend's Inlet Table 9.
February Pecks Beach Table 9.
[and later] 1765 (Ocean City),
Ludlam's Beach
(Cape May Co.)
January 1766 Pecks Beach Table 9.
1766 "Below the Narrows Weiss et al., 1974:104
on the east side" [Journals of Capt.
Montressor. N.Y.
Historical Society
Collections,
vol. 14, 1881].
September 1766 Coney Island Weiss et al., 1974:104
[Proc. N.J. Hist. Soc.,
vol. 13, no. 4, 1928].
1782 Manasquan Beach Weiss et al., 1974:18, 104
[New Jersey Gazette,
Oct. 9, 1782].
1792 Absecon Beach Weiss et al., 1974:34
[Wilson, H. 1953.
The Jersey Shore].
1803 Absecon Bar Lipton, 1975:17 [Kraft,
B.R. 1960]; Weiss et al.,
1974:34, 104 [Wilson, H.
1953. The Jersey Shore].
1809 Delaware River Watson, 1855, vol. 2,
near Chester, Pa. p. 429; contra Weiss et
al., 1974:109.
1813 Absecon Beach Weiss et al., 1974:104-105
[Diary of Samuel Mickle,
in Notes on Old Gloucester
County, N.J. F.H. Steward,
Ed., 1917, vol. 1,
p. 197].
November 1814 Delaware River Weiss et al., 1974:18,
just below Trenton 105, 109, 111 [Sussex
Bridge Register]; Rhoads,
1903:11.
6 May 1820 Sandy Hook See text.
13 May 1820 Sandy Hook See text.
20 May 1820 Sandy Hook(?) Weiss et al., 1974:18,
105; see text.
1824 Near Bayonne, N.J. Weiss et al.,
1974:18, 105-106
[The Washington Whig,
Bridgeton, N.J.,
Aug. 28, 1824].
End of Cape May Weiss et al., 1974:22 [The
March 1825 Bridgeton Observer and
Cumberland, Cape May and
Salem Advertiser, April 2,
1825].
8 November 1861 Delaware River Weiss et al., 1974:106.
near Richmond
1862 Delaware River Cope, 1865, 1866.
near Philadelphia
Ca. 1864-1865 Raritan Bay New York Times, 15 March
1891.
30 May 1874 Raritan River near Cope, 1874:89; Rhoads,
Sayreville 1903:11.
Ca. 10 May 1878 Long Branch New York Times,
12 May 1878.
Spring 1882 Near Egg Harbor Weiss et al.,
1974:110-111;
Holder, 1883.
1900-1910 Asbury Park Weiss et al., 1974:107
[Postcard in Special
Collections, Rutgers
University Library].
(1) The degree of certainty of our identification of the whales as
right whales was evaluated according to the following criteria: 1=whale
was taken by shore whalers in 1725 or earlier; baleen at least 3 ft long
or considered worth saving; yield 40 barrels oil or more; whale clearly
identified as a balaenid by our source (any one of these criteria is
sufficient). 2=whale was taken after 1725; no definite evidence it was a
balaenid, but also no definite evidence that it was not. See Table 3,
footnote 1.
The promise of shore whaling was a major inducement for the first
British settlers on the New Jersey shore and in the mouth of Delaware
Bay (Beesley, 1857:171). Many came from Long Island (Williamson, 1951;
Wood, 1968) where an organized whale fishery was active by 1650 and
possibly earlier (see above). Whalers from Connecticut and Long Island
might have hunted whales along the coast of Cape May and in the mouth of
Delaware Bay as early as 1638 (Alexander, 1975:185). Licenses were
granted to companies of shore whalers operating from Navesink and Sandy
Hook south to Long Beach Island in 1668 and 1678 (Lipton, 1975:18).
William Penn referred to a well-established whale hunt at the mouth of
Delaware Bay by 1683 (Watson, 1855, II:428). A catch of 11 whales in one
season suggests that the enterprise was successful.
The earliest permanent European settlement in Cape May County is
believed to have been established by whalers in about 1685 (Alexander,
1975:185), by which year three companies were whaling in the mouth of
Delaware Bay (Weiss et al., 1974:15; Lipton, 1975:5) and whales were
being hunted "from Sandy Hook to the Delaware Cape" (Weiss et
al., 1974:32). Certainly by 1691 Cape May town, at Town Bank on the Bay
shore, was recognized as "the residence of the whalers, consisting
of a number of dwellings" (Beesley, 1857:163). Beesley inferred
from the close contiguity of the 15-20 houses shown on a contemporary
map of Town Bank that the early whalers cooperated in an organized hunt.
Another source refers to 13 houses in Cape May town in 1696 (Beesley,
1857:177). Beesley (1857:171) identified 21 individual whalemen living
in Cape May County before 1700, and he believed that there were many
others.
In 1692 the New Jersey Assembly asserted the province's
prerogative to profit from all whales killed in Delaware Bay.
Complaining that until then, the whaling had been "in so great a
measure invaded by strangers and foreigners" who exported the oil
and baleen without duty, the Assembly required that a tenth of the value
of the oil from all whales killed in Delaware Bay be paid to the
governor. The West New Jersey Society, a group of London businessmen,
tried to develop whaling in Cape May County during the early 1690's
(Weiss et al., 1974:21). "Great numbers" of whales and
"prodigious" quantities of oil and baleen were taken each year
in Cape May County, according to Gabriel Thomas (1952), writing in 1698.
A manuscript by Thomas Leaming, 1674-1723, provides some detailed
information on 17th century whaling at Cape May (Beesley, 1857:175-6;
also see Lipton, 1975:7). Leaming whaled in four consecutive winter
seasons, 1694-98. The first year he reported that eight whales were
caught and the next year at least a cow and calf were taken. The third
season was apparently successful, but all we learn from Leaming is that
he "made a great voyage." No hint is given about his catch in
the fourth season. Leaming's father, Christopher, had moved to Cape
May from Long Island in about 1691 (Beesley, 1857:176). When not
whaling, Christopher Learning worked as a cooper. This occupation was
lucrative at the time because "the great number of whales caught in
those days, made the demand and pay for casks certain."
All evidence seems to suggest that the years when Thomas Leaming
was whaling represented the peak of the Delaware Bay whale fishery. The
tract owners at Town Bank sold their land and left the area soon after
Christopher Leaming's death in 1696 (Anonymous, 1976). Humphrey
Hughes, a Long Island whaleman who immigrated to Cape May County about
1689, sold his land, which had been owned jointly with another whaler,
in about 1700 (Williamson, 1951). Although Cape May and Delaware Bay
whaling may have been past its peak by the 1700's, it continued
long after that time.
John Peck was whaling at Pecks Beach (now Ocean City, N.J.) in
about 1700 (Darby, 1951), and whaling was still being conducted at the
mouth of Delaware Bay, on both the Cape May and Cape Henlopen sides, in
1708 (Oldmixon, 1708). Apparently referring to the first half of the
18th century, Darby (1951:137) claimed: "Whaling was still a
flourishing industry, the whalemen working from the shore in small open
boats."
The diary of Aaron Leaming, Jr., includes the following entries for
the month of February 1737 (Dickinson, 1979:550): on the 4th "They
kill a whale"; on the 22nd "The whalemen chased the whales
& struck two." Whalers settled permanently on Long Beach Island
as early as 1690, and their efforts to catch whales continued, possibly
without any major interruption, through at least the 1820's
(Lipton, 1975:23-26). The average catch by Stephen Inman's family
in the early 1820's was two or three whales per season, producing
40-50 barrels of oil per year (Watson, 1855, II, app.:547). In a letter
to his son Tucker in Dartmouth, Massachusetts, Philip Taber (1745)
reported the recent arrival of George Sisson at Sandy Hook. Sisson and
his associates were eager to "go off a whaling," and they
wanted Taber's son to bring a whale boat and "some good
hands" to aid their efforts. This letter has been interpreted as
evidence that "New Bedford vessels were engaged in offshore
whaling" (meaning pelagic whaling) in the 1740's (Littlefield,
1965:5n). However, it seems more likely to us that these New Englanders
planned to whale in New Jersey from shore. Such an interpretation would
be consistent with that of Lipton (1975:22-23).
The diary of Lewis Cresse (1968), who whaled along the New Jersey
shore between Brigantine and Five Mile Beach at least from 1752 to 1766,
mentions numerous sightings; one whale struck and probably killed, but
lost, and one secured in 1764; and four taken in 1765 (Table 9).
Table 9.--Whaling data from Lewis Cresse's diary, 1752-1766.
Source: Cresse (1968); some parts of the diary were quoted by Lipton
(1975:15-16) and Weiss at al. (1974:26-28).
Whaling season
Year Start date End date Sightings
1752 ? ? ?
1753 1 March 1st week April ?
1754 27 Feb. 9 April 0
1755 7 March 8 April "Saw Several Spouts at
Several times but Concluded
they was chiefly fin backs."
1756 24 Feb. 7 April One in late Feb.; "several"
in late March or early Apr.
1757 4 March 15 April "Saw Whales and Spouts
Several times."
1758 3 April 18 April 0
1759 26 Feb. 26 March "Saw Several Spouts."
1760 4 March 2 April 0
1764 ? ? "Plenty" on 2 April;
more on 9 April.
1765 February ? "Plenty".
1766 28 Jan. ? "Saw no whales onely
Sore Spouts."
Year Struck/lost Killed/secured Whaling sites
1752 ? 1 "stunt" on 23 Briganteen
March; 1 "yearling" Beech
on ca 22 March
1753 0 0 Briganteen
1754 0 0 Absecon
1755 0 0 Briganteen
1756 0 0 Pecks Beech
1757 0 0 Five mile
Beech
1758 0 0 "Rangd as far
as briginteen."
1759 0 0 Absecon
1760 0 0 Briganteen
1764 1; "it was 1 killed 9 Apr., Five mile
generally agreed sank, came ashore 11 Beetch;
She would Die of Apr. "west of the Townsends Inlet
the wound" Dry inlet"; 23 bbls,
(2 April). 230 lbs bone
(4 ft 8 in. long).
1765 0 2 by Cresse's Seven Mile
company.; 1 by them Beach;
in cooperation with Peck Beach;
Ludlams Beach Ludlams Beach
company.; 1 by
Ludlams Beach
company alone.
1766 0 0 Pecks Beach
At the same time that Cresse was whaling along the coast of New
Jersey, some Cape May whalemen were exploring grounds farther south.
Twelve men and two whale boats sailed aboard the sloop Susannah in
November 1753, bound for a winter of whaling along the Carolina coast
(Smith, 1973:34; Reeves and Mitchell, 1988, provide a derivative
summary). After some desultory whaling near Cape Lookout, the men
established a whaling camp at Lockwood Folly Inlet, southern North
Carolina, then returned to Cape May in March 1754, having had no success
(Smith, 1973:41). They were essentially shore whalers, and we regard
their expedition of 1753-54 as corroborative evidence that shore whaling
around Cape May had become less profitable by this time.
Aaron Leaming, Jr., writing in 1772, claimed that whaling had
"long since" failed in Cape May County (Leaming, 1978). A
whale was taken in 1723, a "yearling" in 1731, and another
"yearling" in spring 1772. In the same document, Leaming wrote
that no whales had been brought ashore between 1732 and 1771, in spite
of the fact that some effort was maintained: "... they went a
whaling on this beach every year for 40 years" after 1731. Up to 12
boats were involved. In 1772, Leaming guessed that six or seven whale
boats were still in use, each with a crew of six. Leaming considered
whaling to have become nothing more than a pretext for the
"whalemen" to roam the beaches in pursuit of other game:
"Whaling seems to be the least part of their Errand. For they carry
Guns and repair to the Beaches & Gun for Deer foxes
Raccoons...." He was particularly incensed by the fact that such
activities disturbed the cattle that were allowed to forage on or near
the beach. We cannot explain the discrepancy between Leaming's two
accounts regarding the dates of whale captures. He may have failed to
mention the 1737 capture simply to strengthen his case against the
whalemen, or he may have forgotten in what year prior to 1772 the last
whale had been taken. From 1810 to 1820 a crew of seven men led by
Captain John Sprague of Manahawkin "followed whaling
exclusively," launching their whaleboat from the beach whenever a
whale was sighted (Clark, 1887:48). Results were described as
"fair."
In the spring of 1820, whales were reported as "frequently
seen in the neighborhood of Sandy-Hook" (Commercial Advertiser,
N.Y., 15 May 1820). This prompted a crew to go whaling in the pilot boat
Clinton. As far as we know, only one whale was taken in three cruises by
the Clinton. Although initially reported as a "young" 45 ft
sperm whale (Centinel of Freedom, Newark, 16 May 1820) and cited as such
by Weiss et al. (1974:105), this whale, struck about 7 miles from Sandy
Hook on 13 May, was almost certainly a right whale (True American,
Trenton, 5 June 1820; Weiss et al. 1974:110). Another large whale had
been struck "on the bar" near Sandy Hook, 6 May; it escaped
bearing two irons and towing 18 fathoms of line with a drag attached
(Centinel of Freedom, 9 May 1820). Weiss et al. (1974) incorrectly
stated that this whale was cut free "while it was being towed
in." The whale was in fact towing the boat at the time of cutting,
according to their source, and their conclusion that the whale secured
13 May was the one struck on 6 May is not supported by the information
in the newspaper sources that they cite. The whale struck but lost 6 May
was probably also a right whale, and all or most of the 25-30 whales
seen during the Clinton's second cruise could have been right
whales. The whale that washed ashore in Long Island Sound 20 May 1820
could have been one of those struck a week or two earlier off Sandy Hook
(Weiss et al. 1974:18, 105).
More whaling took place off Sandy Hook during 1822-23 (Reeves and
Mitchell 1986a). The sloops Ocean of Sag Harbor and Hampton of
Providence were involved, along with one or more smacks from New London.
In early April 1822, "another" large whale was taken off Sandy
Hook (Allen, 1916:134; Nantucket Inquirer, 4 April 1822), the
implication being that this was not the first that season. Ulmer (1961)
believed that whaling had ended in New Jersey by 1833.
Although we believe that the vessels cruising along the New Jersey
and Long Island coasts were in search of right whales primarily, sperm
whales were taken occasionally. Vessels returning from more distant,
lengthy cruises also took sperm whales. For example, the ship Mamfield
of Hudson, arriving in New York 21 March 1839 from a 21-month voyage to
the South Atlantic (Starbuck, 1878:342-343), encountered a large school
of sperm whales off Cape May (Sag Harbor Corrector, 27 Mar. 1839). Five
were killed, but two of these were lost because of darkness. The blubber
of the other three was brought into port on deck.
It appears that by the second half of the 19th century, organized
whaling had been discontinued and that the few documented kills along
the New Jersey coast in the 1870's and early 1880's were the
result of chance encounters rather than of systematic watching or
searching. For example, Long Branch fishermen "drove" a 42 ft
whale to shore and killed it with a scythe in May 1878 (New York Times,
12 May 1878). Judging by its expected oil yield (60 barrels) and the
fact that it was identified in a newspaper account as a "Greenland
whale," this was probably a right whale. The same article claimed
that "several of the species [i.e. `Greenland whales'] have
been seen off the coast recently." A right whale with 5 ft 9 inch
baleen was captured in spring 1882 by "a crew of experienced Egg
Harbor [N.J.] whalers" (Holder, 1883:106). At the time, an old man
told a reporter for the New York Evening Post (24 Oct. 1883) that his
great-grandfather "used to catch all the blubber he could tend to
right off Long Branch." Apparently, this particular whaleman had
given up whaling before the War of Independence (1776). The reporter
claimed that after a century of little or no whaling, whales had, by
1883, "growed plenty again, and the old Jersey fishin' has
revived." Probably referring to the Egg Harbor specimen of 1882, he
noted that a right whale had been taken recently on the New Jersey coast
and that "a regular crew of whalers ... are in the business
there." He added that "numbers of boats all down the coast
make daily trips to sea in search of whales." This last statement
is difficult to evaluate. At face value, it could be taken to suggest
that shore whaling effort increased during the early 1880's not
only locally (near Egg Harbor), but also along much of the New Jersey
coast and southward. However, the only example given in support of the
statement is a reference to Manigault's remark (in Holder 1883)
that several schooners were "now engaged in their [right
whales'] pursuit" off South Carolina (Fig. 13). As discussed
elsewhere (Reeves and Mitchell, 1988), Manigault probably had in mind
the New England vessels that made winter cruises for right whales on the
Southeast U.S. Coast Ground from the mid-1870's through the
1880's (Reeves and Mitchell, 1986b).
[Figure 13 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
In early December 1886 a large whale that had been seen alive in
the Delaware River for several days died, supposedly after being crushed
between two ice floes (New York Times, 9 Dec. 1886). The carcass was
towed to Philadelphia where the blubber and baleen, expected to be worth
$800, were removed. Considering the timing of the whale's
appearance and the fact that its baleen was saved, it was probably a
right whale. Three whales seen close to shore off Cape May the first
week of November 1893 drew a crowd of onlookers, and local fishermen
made plans to attempt their capture on the 6th (New York Tribune, 6 Nov.
1893:1).
British Customs Records
Whale products imported by Great Britain from the American colonies
during the first third of the 18th century (Tables 10, 11, 12) were
likely from whales killed somewhere between Newfoundland and the
Carolinas. Although some whale products may have been trans-shipped
between colonies (e.g. from Carolina to New England--see Reeves and
Mitchell, 1988; Little, 1988; from Long Island to Boston--see above), we
have no reason to suspect that the oil and baleen exported from Boston,
New York, or Philadelphia came from anywhere other than the western
North Atlantic.
Table 10.--Whale products from New England imported by Great
Britain (London and outports combined), 1696-1734. Source: CUST 2 and 3,
Public Record Office, Lond.
Oil Baleen
Period(1) (U.S. gal) (lb)
25 Sep 1696-25 Mar 1697(2) 31,235 8,526
25 Mar 1697-25 Sep 1697(3) 757
25 Sep 1697-25 Sep 1698 29,998 7
25 Sep 1698-25 Dec 1698 5,182
1696-1699 34,077
1699-1700 105,844 13,527
1700-1701 90,649 22,985
1701-1702 120,824 62,530
1702-1703 64,983(4) 15,859
1703-1704 53,956 35,664
[No data for 1704-1705]
1705-1706 2,560(5) 1,342
1706-1707 131,931 3,210
1707-1708 151,381(6) 15,583
1708-1709 65,450 12,045
1709-1710 100,202 18,377
1710-1711 89,154 17,140
[No data for 1711-1712]
1712-1713 68,833 28,929
1713-1714 114,649 26,062
1714-1715 193,569 34,651
1715-1716 172,605 57,169
1716-1717 90,209 13,950
1717-1718 148,810 16,660
1718-1719 133,564 34,143
1719-1720 180,255 48,444
1720-1721 241,771 40,260
1721-1722 151,172 28,996
1722-1723 196,434 42,111
1723-1724 203,861 90,870
1724-1725 177,252(7) 67,141
1725-1726(8) 177,135 68,310
[No data for 1726-1727]
1727-1728 259,829 61,621
1728-1729 168,019 27,705
1729-1730(9) 258,333 89,834
1730-1731 180,525 39,500
1731-1732 234,886 26,887
1732-1733 233,075 45,495
1733-1734 343,973 67,884
Value of oil Value of baleen
(pounds (pounds
sterling: sterling:
Period(1) s:d) s:d)
25 Sep 1696-25 Mar 1697(2) 1,486:0:11 228:7:6
25 Mar 1697-25 Sep 1697(3) 36:0:0 0:0:0
25 Sep 1697-25 Sep 1698 1,664:16:8 0:8:9
25 Sep 1698-25 Dec 1698 286:18:9 3/4
1696-1699 1,756:6:6 1/2
1699-1700 5,035:19:5 936:0:5
1700-1701 4,312:19:5 1,641:15:8 1/4
1701-1702 5,749:0:0 4,466:8:6 3/4
1702-1703 3,091:4:4 1,097:7:8 1/2
1703-1704 2,566:19:9 3/4 2,407:10:7
[No data for 1704-1705]
1705-1706 121:10:0 95:17:1 1/2
1706-1707 6,276:18:6 229:5:8 1/2
1707-1708 7,202:13:3 1/2 1,113:1:5
1708-1709 3,222:2:11 859:17:1 1/2
1709-1710 4,767:5:1 1/2 1,312:12:10 1/4
1710-1711 4,242:3:9 1,224:5:9
[No data for 1711-1712]
1712-1713 3,274:17:7 3/4 2,066:7:2
1713-1714 5,454:12:4 1,861:11:9 1/4
1714-1715 9,210:1:5 2,417:18:9
1715-1716 8,212:15:8 7,283:9:11
1716-1717 4,291:10:9 996:8:6
1717-1718 7,080:4:3 1,115:12:6
1718-1719 6,354:13:4 2,438:15:8
1719-1720 8,576:12:3 3,460:5:7
1720-1721 11,503:7:6 2,875:14:2
1721-1722 7,192:17:1 2,071:2:10
1722-1723 9,346:12:4 3,007:18:6
1723-1724 9,700:2:9 6,490:14:2
1724-1725 8,423:10:5 4,795:15:8
1725-1726(8) 8,428:7:7 4,879:5:8
[No data for 1726-1727]
1727-1728 12,540:19:1 4,401:10:0
1728-1729 8,042:1:9 1,978:18:6
1729-1730(9) 12,292:1:11 6,416:14:2
1730-1731 8,589:6:6 2,821:8:6
1731-1732 11,175:19:10 1,920:10:0
1732-1733 11,089:11:4 3,249:12:10
1733-1734 16,366:9:5 4,848:17:0
(1) From 25 Dec. 1698, all periods are Christmas to Christmas.
(2) In addition, 75 lb of spermaceti (fine) valued at 8-9 shillings
per lb.
(3) Also for this period, 31 gal of train oil was imported from New
Providence.
(4) Of this amount, 246 tuns, 3 hogsheads, 57 gal was classified as
"ordinary oil," but the value was given as 11-13 [pounds
sterling] per tun, i.e. the same as for train oil. Thus, we have
considered it as whale oil.
(5) In addition, 39,626 gal of "ordinary oil," valued at
30 [pounds sterling] per tun, or at about 2.5 times the value of train.
(6) In addition, 525 gal of "ordinary oil," valued at
24-30 [pounds sterling] per tun.
(7) In addition, 2 hogsheads of "blubber" valued at 8-9
[pounds sterling] per tun.
(8) In addition, 154 oz of ambergris valued at 18-20 [pounds
sterling] per oz.
(9) In addition, 113 cwt 3 qtr 5 lb of spermaceti valued at
5:10-8:10 [pounds sterling] per cwt.
Table 11.--Whale products from New York imported by Great Britain
(London and outports combined), 1696-1734. Source: CUST 2 and 3, Public
Record Office, Lond.
Oil Baleen
Period(1) (U.S. gal) (lb)
25 Sep 1696-25 Sep 1697(2) 28,968 8,254
25 Sep 1697-25 Dec 1698(3) 565
1698-1699 1,242 202
1699-1700 15,639
1700-1701 15,016 2,509
1701-1702 38 224
1702-1703(4) 11,545 5,301
1703-1704 3,379 756
[No data for 1704-1705]
1705-1706 623(5) 168
1706-1707 31,980 1,182
1707-1708 9,738 168
1708-1709 10,752 6,033
1709-1710 9,628 46,430
1710-1711 9,488 1,364
[No data for 1711-1712]
1712-1713 141 3,797
1713-1714 5,916 3,675
1714-1715 15,111 2,719
1715-1716 5,756 682
1716-1717 2,774 174
1717-1718 20,497 16,240
1718-1719 15,253 5,746
1719-1720 19,233 3,840
1720-1721 15,938 2,910
1721-1722 1,879 2,488
1722-1723 10,493 2,105
1723-1724 560 11,628
1724-1725 789 1,204
1725-1726 8,232 6,048
[No data for 1726-1727]
1727-1728 1,702 269
1728-1729 950 0
1729-1730 1,009 542
1730-1731 0 169
1731-1732(6) 1,906 0
1732-1733 4,099 1,576
1733-1734 3,094 1,080
Value of oil Value of baleen
([pounds ([pounds
Period(1) sterling]:s:d) sterling]:s:d)
25 Sep 1696-25 Sep 1697(2) 1,263:5:10 3/4 221:1:9 1/2
25 Sep 1697-25 Dec 1698(3) 30:16:7 1/4
1698-1699 63:11:09 10:7:5
1699-1700 743:12:4
1700-1701 714:8:5 1/2 177:14:7 1/2
1701-1702 1:9:4 16:0:0
1702-1703(4) 548:16:3 378:12:11
1703-1704 160:10:0 54:0:0
[No data for 1704-1705]
1705-1706 36:9:9 12:0:0
1706-1707 1,521:1:3 84:8:7
1707-1708 463:2:10 1/2 12:0:0
1708-1709 510:16:2 430:13:6 1/4
1709-1710 457:15:2 3/4 3,316:8:6 3/4
1710-1711 451:4:8 97:8:3
[No data for 1711-1712]
1712-1713 5:12:1 1/2 271:4:3 1/4
1713-1714 281:0:11 1/4 262:10:0
1714-1715 718:3:1 194:4:3
1715-1716 273:15:0 48:11:4
1716-1717 132:0:0 12:8:6
1717-1718 975:4:8 1,159:19:11
1718-1719 724:6:1 410:8:6
1719-1720 913:14:3 274:5:8
1720-1721 758:0:0 207:17:0
1721-1722 206:14:0 177:14:3
1722-1723 498:11:4 150:7:1
1723-1724 26:3:9 830:11:5
1724-1725 37:5:9 86:0:0
1725-1726 390:18:6 432:0:0
[No data for 1726-1727]
1727-1728 80:9:6 19:4:2
1728-1729 45:2:10 0
1729-1730 48:0:0 38:14:3
1730-1731 12:1:5
1731-1732(6) 90:11:5 0
1732-1733 195:0:0 112:11:5
1733-1734 146:13:4 77:2:10
(1) From 25 Dec. 1698, periods covered are Christmas to Christmas.
(2) In addition, 1 cwt, 1 qtr of spermaceti (coarse), valued at
9-14 [pounds sterling] per cwt.
(3) In addition, 47 tuns of "seal oyl," valued at 15
[pounds sterling] per tun.
(4) In addition, 9 tuns of "ordinary" oil, valued at
24-30 [pounds sterling] per tun, i.e. at least twice the value of train
oil.
(5) Listed as "ordinary" oil, but value, 15 [pounds
sterling] per tun, was similar to that of train oil.
(6) In addition, 6 cwt, 2 qtr, 26 lb of spermaceti, valued at
5:10-8:10 [pounds sterling] per cwt.
Table 12.--Whale products from Pennsylvania imported by Great
Britain (London and outports combined), 1696-1734. Source: CUST 2 and 3,
Public Record Office, Lond.
Oil Baleen
Period(1) (U.S. gal) (lb)
25 Sep 1696-25 Sep 1697 1,978 0
25 Sep 1697-25 Dec 1698 0 0
1698-1699 0 560
1699-1700 378 0
1700-1701 267 0
1701-1702 to 1703-1704 0 0
[No data for 1704-1705]
1705-1706 126 28
1706-1707 to 1708-1709 0 0
1709-1710 0 84
1710-1711 0 0
[No data for 1711-1712]
1712-1713 0 0
1713-1714 190 0
1714-1715 1,009 1,122
1715-1716 2,270 0
1716-1717 to 1717-1718 0 0
1718-1719 2,270 0
1719-1720 1,198 0
1720-1721 1,797 0
1721-1722 820 0
1722-1723 1,980 392
1723-1724 8,008 0
1724-1725 7,818 505
1725-1726 3,759 111
[No data for 1726-1727]
1727-1728 0 0
1728-1729 64 0
1729-1730 0 0
1730-1731 383 0
1731-1732 694 0
1732-1733 0 0
1733-1734 252 0
Value of
Value of oil baleen
([pounds ([pounds
sterling] sterling]
Period(1) :s:d) :s:d)
25 Sep 1696-25 Sep 1697 87:7:5 0
25 Sep 1697-25 Dec 1698 0 0
1698-1699 0 28:15:0
1699-1700 18:0:0 0
1700-1701 14:13:3 0
1701-1702 to 1703-1704 0 0
[No data for 1704-1705]
1705-1706 15:0:0 2:0:0
1706-1707 to 1708-1709 0 0
1709-1710 0 6:0:0
1710-1711 0 0
[No data for 1711-1712]
1712-1713 0 0
1713-1714 9:0:0 0
1714-1715 48:0:0 80:2:10
1715-1716 108:0:0 0
1716-1717 to 1717-1718 0 0
1718-1719 108:0:0 0
1719-1720 57:0:0 0
1720-1721 85:4:8 0
1721-1722 39:0:0 0
1722-1723 94:0:0 28:0:0
1723-1724 381:0:0 0
1724-1725 372:0:0 36:1:5
1725-1726 178:0:10 7:18:6
[No data for 1726-1727]
1727-1728 0 0
1728-1729 3:0:0 0
1729-1730 0 0
1730-1731 17:13:4 0
1731-1732 33:0:0 0
1732-1733 0 0
1733-1734 12:0:0 0
(1) From 25 Dec. 1698, all periods covered are Christmas to
Christmas.
The quantities of oil and baleen imported from New Providence, the
Bermudas, and the West Indies or obtained as "prize goods"
were so small in most years as to be negligible (Table 13). In contrast,
very large amounts of "train oil" or blubber, and in a few
years some baleen as well, were imported from Newfoundland (Table 13).
Some (unknown) proportion of the products from Newfoundland could have
come from right whales, but much of the train oil and blubber could as
easily have been from seals and from whales other than right whales. For
some years, the lists show hundreds or thousands of sealskins to have
been imported from Newfoundland in addition to the oil. Some Boston
merchants, at least in 1734, bought whale oil from Nantucket sloops
operating in Newfoundland waters, then shipped this oil directly to
England to avoid paying English taxes on colonial vessels (E. A. Little,
in litt., 17 August 1991). Nantucket vessels certainly hunted sperm,
humpback, and right whales in Newfoundland waters during the 1750's
and 1760's (Reeves and Mitchell, 1986b, their Table 1), but we do
not know enough about the identity, labeling, and routing of products to
comment on how the oil and baleen would have been registered by British
customs. If any of the oil, blubber, or baleen imported from
Newfoundland during the late 1600's and early 1700's (Table
13) was from right whales, this would mean that our removal estimates
based on customs data (see Estimates of Catch from Customs Data, below)
are negatively biased.
Table 13.--Whale products from New Providence, the Bermudas, the
West Indies, Newfoundland (probably including seal oil--see footnote 3),
and "prize goods" (obtained from seized vessels) declared
through British customs at London and outports, 1696-1734. Source: CUST
2 and 3, Public Record Office, Kew.
Oil Blubber Baleen
Area/period(1) (U.S. gal) (U.S. gal) (lb)
New Providence
25 Mar.-25 Sept. 1697 31
Bermudas
25 Sept. 1697-25
Sept. 1698 25 490
1698-1699 3,087
1710-1711 63
1714-1715 630
1716-1717 252
1719-1720 2,546
1720-1721 1,512
1721-1722 1,027
1730-1731 10,836
West Indies
1722-1723 315
1723-1724 42
1729-1730(2) 315
Newfoundland(3)
25 Sept. 1696-
25 Mar. 1697 70,812
25 Mar. 1697-
25 Sept. 1697 40,113 35,280
25 Sept. 1697-
25 Sept. 1698 70,969
25 Sept. 1698-
25 Dec. 1698 194,638
1696-1699 325,147 3/4 252
1699-1700 228,254 1/2 1,323
1700-1701 218,319 1/2
1701-1702 126,681 3/4
1702-1703 7,173
1703-1704 211,308 1/2 126
1705-1706 189,629 1/2 94 1/2 420
1706-1707 115,930 1/2 229
1707-1708 113,819 1/2
1706-1709 201,657
Oil
Area/period(1) Area/period(1) (U.S. gal)
New Providence 1709-1710 212,217
25 Mar.-25 Sept. 1697 1710-1711 144,855
Bermudas 1712-1713 195,253 1/2
25 Sept. 1697-25 1713-1714 138,308 3/4
Sept. 1698 1714-1715 162,993
1698-1699 1715-1716 102,196
1710-1711 1716-1717 121,910 1/2
1714-1715 1717-1718 149,637
1716-1717 1718-1719 123,589
1719-1720 1719-1720 193,296
1720-1721 1720-1721 249,964
1721-1722 1721-1722 296,185
1730-1731 1722-1723 199,878
West Indies 1723-1724 304,028
1722-1723 1724-1725 234,203
1723-1724 1725-1726 166,472
1729-1730(2) 1727-1728 409,991
Newfoundland(3) 1728-1729 452,947
25 Sept. 1696- 1729-1730 339,430
25 Mar. 1697 1730-1731 361,598
25 Mar. 1697- 1731-1732 642,881
25 Sept. 1697 1732-1733(4) 444,290
25 Sept. 1697- 1733-1734 464,013
25 Sept. 1698 Prize Goods
25 Sept. 1698- 25 Sept. 1696-
25 Dec. 1698 25 Mar. 1697 3,337
1696-1699 25 Mar. 1697-
1699-1700 25 Sept. 1697 1,197
1700-1701 25 Sept. 1696-
1701-1702 25 Dec. 1698
1702-1703 1701-1702 31 1/2
1703-1704 1702-1703 33,095 3/4
1705-1706 1705-1706 994
1706-1707 1708-1709
1707-1708 1709-1710 22,757
1706-1709
Blubber Baleen
Area/period(1) (U.S. gal) (lb)
New Providence
25 Mar.-25 Sept. 1697
Bermudas
25 Sept. 1697-25
Sept. 1698
1698-1699
1710-1711
1714-1715
1716-1717
1719-1720 168
1720-1721
1721-1722
1730-1731
West Indies
1722-1723
1723-1724 84
1729-1730(2)
Newfoundland(3) 252 53
25 Sept. 1696- 133
25 Mar. 1697 377
25 Mar. 1697- 406
25 Sept. 1697 1,363
25 Sept. 1697- 5,544 288
25 Sept. 1698
25 Sept. 1698-
25 Dec. 1698 560
1696-1699
1699-1700 174
1700-1701
1701-1702 6,552
1702-1703
1703-1704 11,977
1705-1706
1706-1707 383
1707-1708
1706-1709
(1) From 25 Dec. 1698, periods covered are Christmas to Christmas.
(2) In addition, 88 oz of ambergris.
(3) Sealskins were also declared from Newfoundland in some years:
1708-1,648; 1710-881; 1712-664; 1714-1,405; 1715-145; 1716-750; 1717-76;
1719-3,280; 1720-3,280 (22,743 gal seal oil); 1721-3,223; 1722-3,005
(92,043 gal seal oil); 1723-4,679; 1724-3,192 (61,278 gal seal oil);
1725-470 (87,885 gal seal oil); 1727-2,628 (32,413 gal seal oil);
1728-1,875; 1729-7,025 (49,432 gal seal oil); 1730-567 (52,321 gal seal
oil); 1733-1,420. (The year refers to the period beginning with that
year.)
(4) In addition, 1,437 lb of ambergris.
Whale products imported from the American colonies before about
1715 would have come almost entirely from right whales. A small part of
the production probably came from naturally stranded whales and perhaps
an occasional sperm, humpback, gray, or pilot whale, Globicephala sp.
For the years after 1715, the attribution becomes somewhat more
complicated, as whaling from sloops extended the whalers' range of
operations offshore. Increasing amounts of oil from other species,
especially the sperm whale, are likely to have been mixed in the
returns. However, the sloops of 25 tons from Nantucket initially went
offshore only to Nantucket Shoals and might not have taken many sperm
whales before the late 1720's (Little, 1988). In spite of its
different properties, sperm oil usually was not distinguished in
commerce from right whale or humpback oil before about 1750, by which
time its superiority over mysticete oils as an illuminant had become
widely recognized. "Thereafter, the two kinds of oil--sperm and
whale--would be distinguished in the market place, each being sold as a
separate commodity and priced accordingly" (Kugler, 1980:5).
If the catch composition changed greatly between 1696 and 1734,
particularly with an increasing proportion of sperm whales, we would
expect the ratio of oil (gallons) to baleen (1b) to have increased with
time. A regression of the ratio of oil to baleen against period,
however, shows no significant trend (Table 10: P = 0.49; df = 31; Table
11: P = 0.43; df = 24; Table 12: P = 0.41, df = 2). The domestic (i.e.
within the colonies) consumption of sperm oil for candle-making (Fig.
14) could have been proportionately greater than that of whale oil. If
so, the oil:baleen ratio could be a misleading and poor index of
changing catch composition.
[Figure 14 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Bowheads are the only whales other than right whales that were
valuable sources of baleen during the 17th and early 18th centuries. The
nearest grounds where American east-coast whalers could have encountered
bowheads would have been along the coast of Labrador and in the Strait
of Belle Isle. Much of the American whaling on those grounds took place
during May-October (Reeves and Mitchell 1986b, their Table 1) which
probably would have been largely out of phase with the bowheads'
presence there (Moore and Reeves, 1993). Starbuck's (1878:168)
reference to a New England whaling voyage to Davis Strait in 1732 is the
earliest record of American participation in Arctic bowhead whaling. We
thus assume that the baleen figures in the British customs records
before 1732 mainly represent catches of right whales. Occasional
references to oil and baleen from Hudson Bay and Greenland do appear in
the British customs records, but we have ignored these in order to avoid
mixing bowhead products in our catch estimations.
Drift Whales
The subject of drift whales arises frequently in the literature of
colonial whaling. Drift whales were whales that died at sea and were
found afloat off shore or stranded onshore. Whales that came ashore
alive ("live stranded") probably were also considered drift
whales. Ownership of drift whale carcasses was often contentious, and
this caused them to be mentioned in court and tax records (Pulsifer,
1861; Allen, 1916). In some places, such as Sandwich in 1702, drift
whales in their entirety were donated to the church (Freeman, 1862:85).
A part of each drift whale was appropriated for the ministry at Eastham
beginning in 1662 (Freeman, 1862:362).
Little and Andrews (1982) proposed that on Nantucket, Martha's
Vineyard, and certain parts of the mainland coast, Indians practiced
"drift whaling" before the arrival of Europeans. By drift
whaling they meant an organized effort to find and process the carcasses
of stranded whales. In especially favorable areas, "drift whales
were so numerous that no need had arisen to go to sea to kill them"
(Little and Andrews, 1982:4). Whales of many species, not only right
whales, would then, as now, have come ashore from time to time in the
absence of active whaling. For present purposes, it is important to
separate whales that came ashore due to natural causes from those that
were killed or injured, but not secured, by whalers. The latter would be
considered part of fishing mortality while the former would be part of
natural mortality.
Several authors have concluded that a high proportion of the drift
whales mentioned in early records were casualties of whaling. For
example, Freeman (1862:50) noted concerning drift whales in Cape Cod
Bay: "So numerous were whales in the Bay, and such was the activity
of the whalemen, that instances were frequent of whales, escaping
wounded from their pursuers and dying subsequently, being washed to the
shores." Allen (1916:145-154) and Little (1981) also concluded that
most drift whales in New England during the 17th century had been
harpooned but not recovered at sea. In our tables of catches, we did not
count all drift whales as whaler kills. Rather, we counted only those
whales for which there was evidence suggesting that they had been
struck; for example, when a salvaged carcass was claimed by a whaler, or
when a harpoon was still imbedded. This procedure probably caused some
whales to be excluded from our catch summary even though whalers killed
or mortally wounded them. This effect is probably offset, to some
extent, by the occasional inadvertent inclusion of whales that were not
right whales. There was no way of identifying what proportion of oil and
baleen included in the customs records came from drift whales.
Total Catches From Literature Sources
The total catch of right whales in the area between Delaware and
Maine, based solely on the literature reviewed for this paper (Tables
3-9) and by Reeves and Mitchell (1986a, their Table 1), was about
750-950 during 1620-1924. The low end of this range was obtained by
summing only those takes that were considered "certain" to
have been of right whales. The high end was obtained by summing all
takes tabulated, including those with uncertain species identifications.
In accounting for the catches in Reeves and Mitchell (1986a, their Table
1), we used their conversion of oil returns to whales landed, on the
basis of 36 barrels per whale (values indicated in parentheses in the
"Catch" column of their table) rather than the 44 barrels used
in the present paper (see below).
Estimates of Catch From Customs Data
Annual catches during the period 1697-1734, by region, were
estimated from British customs data (Table 14). In most years, the
estimates based on oil production were much higher than those based on
baleen production. Because of the possibility that oil from cetaceans
other than right whales was routinely included in the oil production
values, it is probably reasonable to regard the baleen-based estimates
as the more accurate (i.e. less biased) estimates of the right whale
catch.
Table 14.--Estimates of right whale catches in New England, New
York, and Pennsylvania, 1697-1734, based on British customs records
(Tables 10-12). Conversion factors are: oil - 1,386 U.S. gal (44
barrels) per whale (see Table 2); baleen--647 lb per whale. Note that
all estimates were rounded down to the nearest integer. See text for a
discussion on interpreting the estimates. (0 = none exported; [0] =
authors' inference).
Right whale catches
New England New York
Year(1) Oil Baleen Oil Baleen
1697 23 13 21 13
1698 25 [0] [0] 0
1699 25 0 1 [0]
1700 76 21 11 0
1701 65 36 11 4
1702 87 97 [0] [0]
1703 47 25 8 8
1704 39 55 2 1
[No data for 1705]
1706 2 2 [0] [0]
1707 95 5 23 2
1708 109 24 7 [0]
1709 47 19 8 9
1710 72 28 7 72
1711 64 26 7 2
[No data for 1712]
1713 50 45 [0] 6
1714 83 40 4 6
1715 140 54 11 4
1716 125 88 4 1
1717 65 22 2 [0]
1718 107 26 15 25
1719 96 53 11 9
1720 130 75 14 6
1721 174 62 11 4
1722 109 45 1 4
1723 142 65 8 3
1724 147 140 [0] 18
1725 128 104 1 2
1726 128 106 6 9
[No data for 1727]
1728 187 95 1 [0]
1729 122 43 1 0
1730 186 139 1 1
1731 130 61 0 [0]
1732 169 42 1 0
1733 168 70 3 2
1734 248 105 2 2
Total 3,610 1,831 203 213
Right whale catches
Pennsylvania Total
Year(1) Oil Baleen Oil Baleen
1697 1 0 45 26
1698 0 0 25 [0]
1699 0 1 26 1
1700 [0] 0 87 21
1701 [0] 0 76 40
1702 0 0 87 97
1703 0 0 55 33
1704 0 0 41 56
[No data for 1705]
1706 [0] [0] 2 2
1707 0 0 118 7
1708 0 0 116 24
1709 0 0 55 28
1710 0 [0] 79 100
1711 0 0 71 28
[No data for 1712]
1713 0 0 50 51
1714 [0] 0 87 46
1715 1 2 152 60
1716 2 0 131 89
1717 0 0 67 22
1718 0 0 122 51
1719 2 0 109 62
1720 1 0 145 81
1721 1 0 186 66
1722 1 0 111 49
1723 1 1 151 69
1724 6 0 153 158
1725 6 1 135 107
1726 3 [0] 137 115
[No data for 1727]
1728 0 0 188 95
1729 [0] 0 123 43
1730 0 0 187 140
1731 [0] 0 130 61
1732 1 0 171 42
1733 0 0 171 72
1734 [0] 0 250 107
Total 26 5 3,839 2,049
(1) The year indicated is always the second of a pair; e.g. 1697
represents 1696-1697 from Tables 10-12.
The yields of oil and baleen for six whaling areas are shown in
Table 2. A one-way Analysis of Variance comparing oil yield per whale
between areas indicates a significant difference ([F.sub.5,131] = 9.53,
Pr(F) [is less than] 0.01). A similar analysis using the baleen yield
gives [F.sub.4,35] = 0.46, Pr(F) = 0.76 (0.67, excluding Cape Farewell).
Thus, baleen yield is less variable than oil yield. The baleen sample
size was only 40, however, compared to 137 for oil. Due to the
difficulty in stratifying the data, we used the overall mean of 44
barrels per whale to estimate catches from oil production.
The variability of the estimated total catches for the period
1696-1734 was calculated by bootstrapping the oil and baleen yield data
summarized in Table 2. Table 15 gives the bootstrap estimates of catch
by area (New England, New York, or Pennsylvania) and whale product (oil
or baleen). The bootstrap means are similar to the estimates given in
the last row of Table 14. The 2.5% and 97.5% quantiles of the estimated
catch distribution are approximate lower and upper 95% confidence limits
for the estimated catches given in the last row of Table 14. Although
similar confidence limits could have been calculated on a yearly basis,
we have shown only those for all years combined in Table 15. The
quantiles and, thus, the 95% confidence intervals, were derived by
assuming that the only source of variability in the catch estimates was
in the oil and baleen yield per whale data. We treated the total oil and
baleen production figures as known constants, but, as mentioned earlier,
there is some (unquantifiable) uncertainty in these values as well due
to the possible mixing of whale products from other species and from
drift whales that died from causes other than whaling.
Table 15.--Estimated catches (bootstrap mean) and estimated
quantiles of the distribution of right whale catches, 1696-1734, based
on estimates of the oil and baleen production data from Tables 10-12 and
the oil and baleen yield per whale data summarized in Table 2. Bootstrap
sample size = 5,000.
Bootstrap
Area Whale products mean
New England 5,007,942 U.S. gal 3,594
New York 283,924 U.S. gal 204
Pennsylvania 35,261 U.S. gal 25
New England 1,183,417 lb baleen 1,827
New York 139,483 lb baleen 215
Pennsylvania 2,802 lb baleen 4
Quantiles
Area 2.5% 50% 97.5%
New England 3,309 3,590 3,909
New York 188 204 222
Pennsylvania 23 25 28
New England 1,624 1,830 2,064
New York 191 216 243
Pennsylvania 4 4 5
Loss Rates
Hunting loss occurs in virtually all whaling operations, so catch
statistics need to be corrected to account for animals killed but not
secured. In a protected area such as Cape Cod Bay, the prospects of a
lost whale's being found were reasonably good. Winthrop (1892:55),
for example, noted that the whalers at Sandwich were confident that a
lost whale, one of three they killed in one day, would "drive on
shore in the bay." At Long Island, extraordinary efforts were made
to secure whales that sank, and a network of informants along the
island's south shore stood to be rewarded for helping to recover a
lost whale (Reeves and Mitchell, 1986a).
We used a loss rate factor (LRF) of 1.2 (meaning 1 of every 6
whales killed or mortally wounded was lost) for correcting catch data
from U.S. shore whaling. This is lower than the LRF's calculated
for 19th century pelagic whaling (1.25-1.57 by Reeves and Mitchell,
1986b) but consistent with our impression of shore whaling at Long
Island (Reeves and Mitchell, 1986a) and the Outer Banks of North
Carolina (Reeves and Mitchell, 1988). Best and Ross (1986) also used 1.2
as an LRF for pre-modern shore whaling for right whales in southern
Africa, even though their data suggested that almost as many whales were
struck and lost as were taken. In all cases, it was assumed that some
struck whales survived and recovered from their wounds.
By using the same LRF for all areas and times, no allowance is made
for differences in technique or technology, benthic topography,
currents, weather, whale behavior, or other factors that could have
affected the loss rate. The incompleteness of catch records and the many
other uncertainties in the data make us feel that any fine-tuning of the
loss rate would give a false impression of precise knowledge. What is
important, given our ultimate objective of obtaining a minimum estimate
of historical population size, is that we apply a conservative (i.e.
negatively biased) loss rate and minimize the risk of upward bias in
estimating removals. By including some drift whales in the totals of
secured catch, we introduce a small amount of upward bias in the removal
estimates. However, since under-reporting of the catch is presumed to be
substantial, this problem can be considered trivial.
Total Kill
By applying the LRF of 1.2 to the catch estimates above for the
period 1620-1924, we estimate the total kill of right whales from the
literature as 883-1,118. The estimated catch of 2,049 whales between
1697 and 1734, based on amounts of baleen shipped to England, becomes
2,459 whales when adjusted in the same way, while the estimate for the
same period based on oil imports is 3,839, adjusted to 4,607 to account
for losses. If Best's (1987) estimates of average yield (67 bbl and
563 lb) were applied to these same production data, the total estimates
from baleen (2,355 raw, 2,826 adjusted) and oil (2,521 raw, 3,025
adjusted) would be in closer agreement.
Whaling Seasons
Figure 15 shows the cumulative records of the right whale's
occurrence, by month, using data from Reeves and Mitchell (1986a, b,
1988) and this paper. The sample consists of some 305 records for which
the month was known; 660 available records could not be used because the
month was not known. Each whale represents a "record"; for
example, if 2 whales were seen together in one sighting in January, we
counted the event as 2 records for that month. No distinction was made
between whales seen and whales taken.
[Figure 15 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Discussion
Chronology of Whaling Effort
In her study of the role of Native Americans (Indians) in the
development of shore whaling at Nantucket, Little (1981) estimated the
years when shore whaling (as distinct from drift whaling) began along
various parts of the east coast: 1690 for Nantucket, 1688 "or just
before" for Cape Cod, 1667 for Long Island, and 1680 for Cape May.
Her starting dates for Cape Cod and Long Island are too late, according
to the sources cited earlier in this paper. Whaling was underway in
Massachusetts, Cape Cod, and Narragansett bays well before 1688. In
fact, shore whaling had become well established and profitable in these
areas by that time. Allen (1908:314) gave starting dates of 1631 for
Massachusetts Bay, 1652 for Martha's Vineyard, and 1672 for
Nantucket. There is also no reason to suppose that Long Island shore
whaling began as late as 1667. Whaling companies had been formed in at
least three localities at the east end during the 1650's (Ross,
1902). Whaling along the New Jersey coast certainly began before 1680,
although the settlement at Cape May apparently was not developed as a
whaling center until the early 1680's.
Little (1981) also estimated the peak years of shore whaling at the
various sites: Nantucket in 1726, Cape Cod in 1714-1724, Long Island in
1687-1707, and Cape May in 1707-1714. While acknowledging Macy's
(1835) claim that the record-high catch of right whales occurred at
Nantucket in 1726, it must also be acknowledged that shore whaling had
been intensive on the island well before this time. The catch of an
estimated 15 right whales by six sloops in 1715 (see above) suggests
that the Nantucket whalemen were already expanding their effort offshore
to supplement the shore-based catch.
Our findings for Long Island (this paper; Reeves and Mitchell,
1986a) agree reasonably well with Little's (1981) conclusion that
the peak in whaling effort and catch occurred there at or shortly after
the beginning of the 18th century. The largest volume of whale oil was
exported from New York to Great Britain in 1706-07 (31,980 U.S.
gallons), and the largest amount of baleen was exported in 1709-10
(46,430 lb). Little's estimate of 84 whales as a maximum 1-year
catch is somewhat more than our estimate of 71 whales based on the
baleen exported in 1709-10. Little reasoned that 28 whaling companies
caught an average of 3 whales each in a good year, for a total of 84,
and she noted that this number of whales, at 50 barrels each, would
produce 4,200 barrels of oil. This is consistent with the return of
4,000 barrels listed for 1707 by Cornbury (1708:59). The average yield
for right whales killed off Long Island was about 36 barrels (Reeves and
Mitchell, 1986a) rather than 50, so the secured catch in 1707 was
probably more than 100 whales. An aspect of Little's analysis that
is certainly in error is her statement that Long Island shore whaling
terminated by 1717. Although the catch might have begun to decline in
the 1720's (Table 11), Long Island shore whaling continued for
another two centuries.
Little (1981) concluded that Cape May whaling began to reach a peak
just as Long Island whaling began to decline. This idea is consistent
with the fact that many of the Cape May whalers were immigrants from
Long Island. However, there is considerable evidence suggesting that
Cape May whaling was already flourishing in the 1690's. While New
Jersey shore whaling certainly had declined by 1734, when Little
considered it finished, it continued on some parts of the coast for
another century.
Overall, whaling for right whales appears to have been particularly
intensive in the eastern United States between about 1685 and 1730.
During this time, whales were hunted from shore and vessels in much of
New England, Long Island (New York), New Jersey, and North Carolina.
Shore whaling was underway for several decades before 1685 and continued
for nearly two centuries after 1730. The trend toward distant-water
whaling by American whalers in the late 18th and 19th centuries, and the
transition to sperm, bowhead, and humpback whales as target species, was
a reflection of decreased right whale abundance worldwide but did not
necessarily give right whales a reprieve along the U.S. east coast. Even
as the pelagic whalers turned their attention to other species, they
continued to take right whales encountered during cruises as well as
coming into or departing pons.
The War of Independence (1776-1783) is said to have lessened
whaling effort, and in turn decreased the pressure on whale stocks.
Stackpole (1972:4), referring to the years immediately following the
war, stated: "Due to the war years the number of whales along the
coast had increased, not having been hunted, and became easy prey for
the newcomers. This brought a glut on the American market, especially in
Boston, Philadelphia, Baltimore, New York, and Charleston...."
Although to exactly which "coast" Stackpole's remark
applied is unclear, whaling all along the American east coast presumably
was interrupted by the hostilities (Starbuck, 1878:177). Thus, the
stocks of right, humpback, and sperm whales in the western North
Atlantic may have profited from the war to some degree. However, the
stocks in distant seas would seem to have gained even more of a respite.
The Nantucket whaling fleet had already extended its activity far to the
north (Davis Strait, Strait of Belle Isle, Gulf of St. Lawrence) and
south (Brazil Banks, Falkland Islands) before the war (Stackpole, 1953),
but long voyages would have become virtually impossible during it.
Starbuck (1878:177-179) listed a number of bonds on whaling vessels as
having been filed with the Massachusetts state treasurer during the
period 1775-1783, but he had little information on their returns or on
where they whaled during this period.
In 1779 or 1780 the whalers of Nantucket obtained permits from the
British military authorities in New York "for a few vessels, about
fifteen, to whale on our Coast, which were successful" (Rotch,
1916:15). Apparently many of these vessels cruised "in Boston Bay
and its vicinity" (Rotch, 1916:26). Twenty-four such permits were
secured the following year (Rotch, 1916:27), and permits for 35 whaling
vessels were granted by the Continental Congress to Nantucketers shortly
before the treaty of peace was signed in 1783 (Rotch, 1916:34). It can
only be assumed that what remained of Nantucket's whaling fleet
after the first several years of war with Great Britain cruised at every
opportunity in local waters. This would have meant that, during the war
years, whaling activity was concentrated on the coastal stocks of right
and humpback whales.
Whaling Seasons and Inferences About Whale Migratory Behavior
Allen's (1916:140) conclusion that right whales were
"practically absent" from New England between early June and
October is generally borne out by the historical sources that we
reviewed (Fig. 15). Shore whaling in Connecticut began as early as
December and apparently finished by the end of March (Table 6). Although
a "straggling" right whale could be encountered off
Provincetown at any time, they were most common there in late April and
early May (Atwood in J. A. Allen, 1869:203). Allen (1916:143) proposed
that, after May, the right whale population moved "off the Grand
Banks and thence northeasterly, even to Iceland." He did not
mention that right whales congregated during summer in the lower Bay of
Fundy and on the Scotian Shelf as they are known to do today (Arnold and
Gaskin, 1972; Kraus et al., 1982; Mitchell et al., 1986a; Stone et al.,
1988). In fact, there is no certain evidence that these areas had the
same relative importance to right whales in Allen's and earlier
times as they appear to have at present. Allen's speculation that
at least part of the population moved east of the Grand Bank and
possibly even to Denmark Strait (Allen, 1972:502) is, however,
consistent with some of the whaling data (Schevill and Moore, 1983;
Reeves and Mitchell, 1986b), as well as with recently documented
movements by individual right whales (Knowlton et al., 1992).
The timing of right whale occurrence off New England and Long
Island was roughly coincident. On Long Island, whaling usually began in
October or November and lasted until April or early May (Reeves and
Mitchell, 1986a). Summer records are almost as rare for Long Island as
for New England. Although they whaled through the winter, Long Island
whalemen did not consider the whales to be overwintering in their area.
Rather, they believed that the animals were always moving through it,
remaining in one spot for no more than a few days (similar to the spring
observations off Cape Cod by Watkins and Schevill, 1982). At least
toward the end of the 19th century, late winter was considered the best
season for whaling at Long Island. At this time, the whales were
believed by the whalers to be on a northward migration (Edwards and
Rattray, 1932:18).
By all accounts, the whaling off New Jersey and in Delaware Bay
was, like that in New England and New York, prosecuted principally
during winter and early spring. The Dutch whale fishery in Delaware Bay
lasted from December to March (Parr, 1969: 112). Thomas Leaming's
17th-century account refers to whaling as a winter and early spring
activity, the season being finished by no later than the first of May
(Beesley, 1857:175-176). Lewis Cresse's diary indicates that
whaling began as early as the end of January or early in February and
lasted until as late as the middle of April, at least during the 18th
century (Table 9). Watson (1855, II:547) indicated that February and
March were the peak months of whaling at Long Beach Island. All of the
confirmed right whale records in Table 8 that include the month of
occurrence are for March, April, or May, with one exception (November).
The evidence suggests that some right whales over-wintered in Delaware
Bay and off New Jersey but that their numbers increased in February and
March, perhaps as animals that wintered to the southward or far offshore
began arriving on their passage to the north.
Catch Levels and Trends
To Mid 1800's
Any conclusions about the magnitude of removals from the right
whale population prior to about the mid 1800's should be made with
great caution. The records are far too fragmentary to support reliable
quantitative assessments. The surviving sample of pelagic whaling
journals and logbooks for the 18th century is small (Fonda, 1969;
Sherman et al., 1986). This is the time when right whales may still have
been relatively abundant on some grounds (e.g. east of the Grand Bank,
in the Strait of Belle Isle and Gulf of St. Lawrence, and perhaps along
the Labrador coast). Other primary sources, such as the Whalemen's
Shipping List (WSL, 1843-1914), the Dennis Wood (N.d.) abstracts,
Starbuck (1878), and the Maury (1852) and Townsend (1935) charts, begin
their detailed coverage of American pelagic whaling in the 1780's
or later. There are very few good primary sources of data for the
critical period between about 1715 and 1760. We do know, however, that
people on Cape Cod actively drove blackfish (pilot whales) in the fall
and winter and that they whaled in sloops far offshore in the spring and
summer, taking mainly sperm whales (Dudley, 1896). With respect to shore
whaling, a much higher catch was probably made between 1650 and the
early 1800's than our tables show (including those in this paper as
well as those in Reeves and Mitchell, 1986a and 1988). The secondary
sources, as well as a few primary sources, providing information on
shore-based catches during the 17th and 18th centuries do so in a
completely unsystematic way. For example, while Winthrop (1892:55)
stated that whalers killed 29 whales in Cape Cod Bay in one day prior to
27 January 1700, he provided no information about whales killed on other
days that winter. The context suggests that the season's total
catch was higher than 29: "... all the boates round the bay killed
twenty nine whales in one day, as som that came this week report; as I
came by when I was there last one company had killed three, two of which
lay on Sandwich beach, which they kild the day before, and reckned they
had kild another the same day, which they expected would drive on shore
in the bay." It can be inferred that the 3 killed on the day of
Winthrop's own visit to Sandwich probably were not part of the 29.
Considering that the peak months of the right whale's occurrence
off the Massachusetts coast are April and May (Schevill et al., 1986)
and that Winthrop's letter was written in late January, perhaps
more whales were killed in the bay later in the season. It is not even
possible to be certain that 29 was the greatest one-day catch in Cape
Cod Bay during the height of shore whaling there, although Winthrop
described the winter season of 1699-1700 as "favorable."
Considering the amount of whaling effort required to kill 29 whales in
one day, it is clear that substantial whaling activity occurred at Cape
Cod in the years immediately before and after 1700 (cf. Table 10).
Prices paid in England for whale oil and baleen were fairly stable
during the period 1697-1734. Whale oil remained in the range (usually
toward the high end) of 10-14 [pounds sterling] sterling per tun, while
baleen began at 3 [pounds sterling] in 1697 and increased to 7-9 [pounds
sterling] per cwt by 1700, where it remained through 1734 (unpubl. data
from Public Record Office). Some of the variability within these ranges
may have been due to differences in quality of the merchandise on its
arrival in London rather than to changes in valuation through time. In
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we make the simplest assumption
that whaling effort was constant or increasing over the period for which
customs data are available. Production statistics, and their interplay
with prices, may therefore serve as reasonable indices for trends in
whale availability.
However strong the incentives were for the colonists to send their
whale products to England (Kugler, 1980), the entire colonial production
would not have been exported each year. There was some demand for these
products in the colonies themselves--"country consumption" as
Macy (1835) referred to it. At least small amounts were also shipped to
the West Indies (Macy, 1835). However, there is no sensible way of
adjusting the production figures to account for domestic consumption or
exports to destinations other than England.
One factor that may have influenced the distribution of production
levels among states is tax avoidance. As discussed above (see section on
New York (Long Island); Headlam, 1930:16), strong dissatisfaction with
duties on whales caught in New York waters may have resulted in products
being exported instead from Boston (i.e. New England). A sharp, but
temporary, decline did occur in imports from New York immediately after
1714-15, but by 1717-18 the returns on oil and baleen were back to
earlier levels (Table 11). The exceptionally high returns of oil and
baleen for New England in 1714-15 and 1715-16 are consistent with the
possibility that Long Island whalemen were smuggling their oil and
baleen to Boston rather than paying the taxes in New York. This
smuggling, however, was a long-standing practice (Edwards and Rattray,
1932:213-217; Reeves and Mitchell, 1986a), and it probably influenced
the New York:New England product ratios in other years as well.
Mid 1800's-20th Century.
The catch record is probably more nearly complete beginning in
1822, when the Nantucket Inquirer started publication, than it is for
the years 1734-1822. From 1822 on, a large percentage of the shore-based
catches made in New England and New York probably would have been
reported in a whaling-town newspaper (e.g. Nantucket's Inquirer or
Journal, Sag Harbor's Corrector, New Bedford's Whalemen's
Shipping List). This assumption, however, is speculative. Only about
one-third of the dated records given by Allen (1916:141) are from years
before 1822, but this should not be interpreted to mean that twice as
many observations of right whales were made in the century following
1821 than during the two centuries before then. The increased frequency
of Allen's reports over time (for example, 9+ records for 1800-1850
vs. 63+ for 1850-1900 fide Schevill et al., 1986), may be an artifact of
documentation factors, at least to some extent. Allen's historical
record, however "painstakingly compiled" (Schevill et al.,
1986) may be considered little more than a collection of random hints at
what occurred in colonial and early post-colonial times. It cannot be
compared, at face value, to Schevill et al.'s documented record of
observations over a 27-year period (1955-1981). The suggestion that
"the population of right whales passing near Cape Cod is at worst
only slightly smaller now than it was in the 17th century"
(Schevill et al., 1986) is not supported by the data, particularly in
view of the large amounts of oil and baleen exported to England during
the early 18th century (Reeves, 1991; Reeves et al.(2); Tables 10-13).
The apparent increase in catches of right whales between about 1840
and 1890 (Tables 3, 4, 7, 8; Reeves and Mitchell, 1986a, b, 1988) is
probably due, at least in part, to the steadily improving documentation
over this period (more newspapers extant, larger samples of logbooks and
journals available, etc.). It also may be due, at least in part, to
stock recovery as suggested by Allen (1972:503). The period was
concurrent with the initiation and collapse of the North Pacific pelagic
right whale fishery in the 1840's-1850's (Scarff, 1986), and
the resultant search by New England whalers for new whaling
opportunities. In addition to exploring the bowhead alternative in the
1850's-1860's, American pelagic whalers discovered a small
winter concentration of right whales off northern Florida, Georgia, and
South Carolina in the mid-1870's in what is now known to be a
calving ground, then hunted it intensively through the early 1880's
(Reeves and Mitchell,. 1986b, 1988).
It is also possible that improvements in gear would have made right
whales easier to approach and secure. For example, the toggle iron,
introduced in the middle of the 19th century, was a major innovation
which increased whaling efficiency (Lytle, 1984; Mitchell et al.,
1986b). Later, steam-powered vessels were used to catch and tow fin and
humpback whales off Cape Cod in the 1880's. These factors would
have increased fishing power and reduced the loss rate. The use of
shoulder guns and to a lesser extent darting guns in some fisheries in
the last half of the 19th century may have had the opposite effect.
Early Population Size
It is known that in some years during the 16th century Basque
whalers shipped 14,000-18,000 barrels of whale oil from their camps
along the Strait of Belle Isle (Barkham, 1984). Assuming that Basque
barrels contained 56 U.S. gallons (i.e. 211 liters,fide Proulx,
1993:63), that the average yield for right whales was 1,386 U.S. gallons
(44 standard barrels at 31.5 U.S. gallons per barrel--this paper), and
that half the oil was from right whales (Cumbaa, 1986), this production
would suggest a landed catch in the order of 283-364 right whales per
year. Aguilar (1986) estimated that the Basques took 300-500 right
whales per year (including an uncertain number of bowheads) between 1530
and 1610, but he refrained from attempting to estimate the initial stock
size. It is nevertheless obvious from these Basque whaling data that at
least a few thousand right whales inhabited the northern portions of the
western North Atlantic stock's range in the early 1500's.
Our data on catches in the northeastern United States after the
mid-1600's allow us to make a cumulative catch estimate of the
number of right whales present south of Cabot Strait as late as the
1720's. (A cumulative catch estimate assumes that net recruitment
is zero so that the original population at the beginning of a short time
period such as a decade is the number of whales killed plus the number
remaining (Woodby and Botkin, 1993).) Using only the central estimates
of landed catch in New England, New York, and Pennsylvania based on
baleen production (Table 14), adjusted for hunting loss by multiplying
by 1.2, we estimate that at least 1,128 right whales were killed from
1724 to 1734 (there are no data for 1727). It is reasonable to conclude
that a stock of at least 1,100-1,200 right whales still existed in the
western North Atlantic in 1724.
It could be argued that by the late 1720's the whaling returns
included an increasing amount of oil and baleen from bowheads, although
the literature (summarized earlier in this paper) suggests that bowheads
were not hunted regularly by New England whalemen until the 1730's.
Even if we were to limit our estimate to catches before 1725, there
would have had to be more than 1,000 right whales present in the
1690's to support the documented take levels in the subsequent
three decades (Tables 10-14).
Conclusions
Some right whales migrate seasonally between wintering grounds off
the southeastern United States and summering grounds off southeastern
Canada (Kraus et al., 1986). The whales found in summer near the Cape
Farewell Ground in the southern Irminger Sea, in the Labrador Basin, and
off Newfoundland and Labrador also belong to the western North Atlantic
stock (Knowlton et al., 1992). There is no reason to doubt
Aguilar's (1986) contention that the stock of right whales in the
Strait of Belle Isle was depleted by 1610. Thus, the population of
whales observed by the Plymouth pilgrims at Cape Cod in 1620 (Thacher,
1832:20), and soon thereafter hunted by the colonists along the U.S.
east coast, had already been reduced substantially by Basque whaling to
the north, since the distribution of right whales was continuous along
the North American coast from Labrador to Florida. This stock's
history of exploitation along the east coast of the United States dates
back to the mid-1600's. We conclude, based on the documented scale
of removals during the late 1600's and early 1700's, that
right whales were still at least several times more abundant in the
western North Atlantic during the mid to late 1600's than they are
now.
From the early 1980's to early 1990's, the western North
Atlantic population of right whales was thought to be growing at an
annual rate of about 2.5% (Knowlton et al., 1994). This is well below
the estimated rates of 7% or somewhat higher for several southern right
whale populations that have been monitored since the early 1970's
(Best, 1993; IWC, In press). Moreover, right whales are still very rare
in many areas of the North Atlantic where they were abundant
historically, such as the Gulf of St. Lawrence and Strait of Belle Isle,
around Iceland and the British Isles, and the Bay of Biscay. In spite of
total protection from whaling since the 1930's, the stock, or
stocks, in the North Atlantic have either not recovered or have
recovered slowly in comparison with Southern Hemisphere stocks. Many
factors may be involved.
Mortality from collisions with vessels and entanglements in fishing
gear has certainly contributed to the slowness of recovery in recent
decades, if not also earlier this century (Kraus, 1990; Katona and
Kraus, 1999). Caswell et al. (1999) report a declining survival
probability from 1980 to 1994. Recent analyses have also found a
significant linear increase in the mean inter-birth interval from 1980
to the late 1990's (S. D. Kraus, personal commun, in Caswell et al.
1999). It is also possible that the environmental carrying capacity has
declined as a result of intensive human use of coastal areas formerly
inhabited by right whales (e.g. Delaware Bay, the New York Bight, Boston
harbor).
Low abundance could explain the failure to detect and document
recovery of severely depleted populations of baleen whales. The North
Atlantic right whale population likely was reduced by 1900 to a few
individual founders responsible for its survival for generations (Brown,
1991). The small number of whales remaining alive when whaling stopped,
before extensive environmental degradation occurred, represents an
important factor in the population's slow recovery and low
abundance (cf. Schaeff et al., 1997). The difficulty experienced by
shore whalers in New England, New York, and New Jersey in finding right
whales during the late 1800's and early 1900's attests to the
species' scarcity at that time.
Acknowledgments
We appreciate the cooperation of the staffs at the G. W. Blunt
White Library, Mystic Seaport Museum; Old Dartmouth Historical Society,
New Bedford Whaling Museum; New Bedford Free Public Library; New London
Historical Society; Providence Public Library; Nantucket Atheneum
Library; Peter Foulger Museum; New York Historical Society; and American
Museum of Natural History.
The assistance of Richard Kugler, Barbara Lipton, James G. Mead,
Paul Cyr, Virginia Adams, William Peterson, and Elizabeth Little in
guiding us to useful references is especially appreciated. Moira Brown,
Laurie Schell, Karen Richardson, and Anne Evely provided assistance at
various early stages of this project at the Arctic Biological Station,
Department of Fisheries and Oceans, near Montreal. The review of
literature was funded by the U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, National
Marine Fisheries Service, under contract NA85-WC-C-06194.
(1) Recent usage has established Eubalaena as the genus name for
the right whales (Schevill, 1986). However, in his list of marine
mammals of the world, Rice (1998) reverts to the genus name Balaena, and
recognizes two subspecies of right whale, the Northern Hemisphere right
whale, B. g. glacialis, and the Southern Hemisphere right whale, B. g.
australis.
(2) Reeves, R. R., J. M. Breiwick, and E. Mitchell. 1992.
Pre-exploitation abundance of right whales off the eastern United
States. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA, Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv., Northeast Fish.
Sci. Cent. Ref. Doc. 92-05:5-7.
Literature Cited
Aguilar, A. 1986. A review of old Basque whaling and its effect on
the right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) of the North Atlantic. Rep. Int.
Whal. Comm., Spec. Iss. 10:191-199.
Alexander, R. C. 1975. Cape May County Census. Cape May County Mag.
Hist. Geneal. 7(3): 184-193.
Allen, G. M. 1916. The whalebone whales of New England. Mem. Boston
Soc. Nat. Hist. 8(2): 107-322.
--. 1972. Extinct and vanishing mammals of the western hemisphere
with the marine species of all the oceans. Cooper Square Publishers,
Inc., N.Y., Spec. Publ. 11, 620 p.
Allen, J. A. 1869. Catalogue of the mammals of Massachusetts: with
a critical revision of the species. Harv. Univ., Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool.
8(1):143-252.
--. 1908. The North Atlantic right whale and its near allies. Bull.
Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 24(18):277-329.
Anonymous. 1802. A relation or journal of a plantation settled at
Plymouth in New England, and proceedings thereof: First printed in 1622,
and abbreviated in Purchas' Pilgrims, Book X. Chap. IV. Lond.,
1625. Collect. Mass. Hist. Soc. 8:203-239.
--. 1976. March 1960! Bulletin for Sale! Elegant Plantation in Cape
May! (Now North Cape May). Cape May County Mag. Hist. Geneal.
7(4):365-366.
Arnold, P. W., and D. E. Gaskin. 1972. Sight records of right
whales (Eubalaena glacialis) and finback whales (Balaenoptera physalus)
from the lower Bay of Fundy. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 29(10): 1477-1478.
Arnold, S. G. 1859. History of the State of Rhode Island and
Providence Plantations. Vol. I. 1636-1700. D. Appleton & Co., N.Y.,
574 p.
--. 1860. History of the State of Rhode Island and Providence
Plantations. From the settlement of the state, 1636, to the adoption of
the Federal Constitution, 1790. In two volumes. Vol. II. 1700-1790. D.
Appleton & Co., N.Y., 592 p.
Ball, R. W. D. 1994. Nautical antiques, with value guide. Schiffer
Publ. Ltd., Atglen, Pa, 238 p.
Banks, C. E. 1966a. The history of Martha's Vineyard, Dukes
County, Massachusetts. In three volumes. Volume II - Town annals. Publ.
by Dukes County Hist. Soc., Edgartown, 209 p., 147 p., 74 p., 82 p., 68
p., 35 p., 27 p., 18p.
--. 1966b. The history of Martha's Vineyard, Dukes County,
Massachusetts. In three volumes, Volume I--General history. Dukes County
Hist. Soc., Edgartown, 535 p.
Barkham, S. H. 1984. The Basque whaling establishments in Labrador
1536-1632 - A summary. Arctic 37(4):515-519.
Beesley, M. 1857. Sketch of the early history of Cape May County,
to accompany the geological report of the State of New Jersey for said
county. True Am., Trenton, p. [159] - 208 [iss. separately].
Bentley, W. 1911. The Diary of William Bentley, D. D. Pastor of The
East Church, Salem, Massachusetts. Volume 3, January, 1803 - December,
1810. Essex Inst., Salem, Mass., 601 p.
Best, P. B. 1987. Estimates of the landed catch of right (and other
whalebone) whales in the American fishery, 1805-1909. Fish. Bull.
85(3):403-418.
--. 1993. Increase rates of severely depleted stocks of baleen
whales. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 50(2): 169-186.
--. and G. I. B. Ross. 1986. Catches of right whales from
shore-based establishments in southern Africa, 1972-1975. Rep. Int.
Whal. Comm., Spec, Iss. 10:275-289.
Blacksmith [Nathaniel Starbuck, Jr.?]. 1683-1738MS. Account Book
No. 128, Peter Foulger Mus., Nantucket.
Bradstreet, S. 1855. Bradstreet's journal. 1664-83. New Engl.
Hist. Geneal. Regist. 9:43-51.
Bridenbaugh, C. 1974. Fat mutton and liberty of conscience: Society
in Rhode Island, 1636-1690. Brown Univ. Press, Providence, 157 p.
Brown, M. W. 1991. Sex, lies and autoradiographs. Whalewatcher, J.
Am. Cetacean Soc. 25(3): 13-15.
Caswell, H., M. Fujiwara, and S. Brault. 1999, Declining survival
probability threatens the North Atlantic right whale. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 94:3308-3313.
Caulkins, F. M. 1895. History of New London, Connecticut. From the
first survey of the coast in 1612, to 1860. H. D. Utley, New Lond., 696
p.
Clark, A. H. 1887. The whale-fishery. I. - History and present
condition of the fishery. In G. B. Goode (Editor), The fisheries and
fishery industries of the United States. Sect. V. History and methods of
the fisheries, vol. II, pt. XV:3-218. Gov. Print. Off., Wash.
Colby, B. L. 1990. For oil and buggy whips: whaling captains of New
London County, Connecticut. Mystic Seaport Museum, Mystic, CT, 203 p.
Cope, E. D. 1865. Note on a species of whale occurring on the
coasts of the United States. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 17:168-169.
--. 1866. Contribution to the history of the Cetacea, especially of
the eastern American coasts. [Extr. from Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci, Phila.
for 1865.] Merrihew & Son, Printers, Phila., 15 p.
--. 1874. [Capture of a young Balaena cisarctica, near South Amboy,
on May 30th.] Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1874:89-90.
Cornbury, Lord. 1855 [1708]. Lord Cornbury to the Board of Trade.,
In E. B. O'Callaghan (Editor), Documents relative to the Colonial
History of the State of New York; procured in Holland, England and
France, by John Romeyn Brodhead, Esq., Agent, under and by virtue of an
Act of the Legislature entitled "An Act to appoint an Agent to
procure and transcribe Documents in Europe relative to the Colonial
History of the State", passed May 2, 1839, p. 55-61, Vol. 5, [In 14
Volumes, 1853-1883] Weed, Parsons and Company, Printers, Albany. Vol. V.
Transcripts of Documents in the Queen's State Paper Office; in the
Office of the Privy Council; in the British Museum; and in the Library
of the Archbishop of Canterbury at Lambeth, in London. London Documents:
XVII-XXIV. 1707-1733. i-xix + 985 p.
Crapo, W. W. 1876. Historical Address by Hon. William W. Crapo,
delivered on the occasion of the Celebration In New Bedford of the
Fourth of July, 1876. To which are added an account of the celebration,
and an appendix. Centennial In New Bedford, E. Anthony & Sons,
Printers to the City, New Bedford, 175 p.
Cresse, L. 1968. The whaler's diary. Cape May County Mag.
Hist. Geneal. 6(5):277-287.
Cumbaa, S. L. 1986. Archaeological evidence of the 16th century
Basque right whale fishery in Labrador. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm., Spec.
Iss. 10:187-190.
Darby, B. 1951. The Ocean City story. Cape May County Mag. Hist.
Geneal. 3(5):135-145.
De Vries, D. P. 1853. Voyages from Holland to America, A.D. 1632 to
1644. Billin & Brothers, N.Y. [transl. from Dutch by H. C. Murphy.]
Dickinson, K. A. 1979. Comments on Aaron Learning, Jr. Diary -
1737. Cape May County Mag. Hist. Geneal. 7(7):541-553.
Donck, A. van der. 1841. Description of the New Netherlands. N.Y.
Hist. Soc., Collect. 2nd ser. Vol. 1, p. 125-242 [Transl. by Jeremiah
Johnson from the Dutch original of 1655.]
Douglass, W. 1760. A summary, historical and political, of the
first planting, progressive improvements, and present state of the
British settlements in North America. Printed for R. and J. Dodsley, in
Pall-mall, Lond., vol. 1, 568 p.; vol. 2,416 p.
Dudley, D. 1896. History and genealogy of the Bangs family in
America. Published privately, Montrose, Mass.
Edwards, E. J., and J. E. Rattray. 1932. "Whale off!" The
story of American shore whaling. Frederick A. Stokes Co., N.Y., 285 p.
Felt, J. B. 1834. History of Ipswich, Essex, and Hamilton. C.
Folsom, Camb., Mass., 377 p.
--. 1849. Annals of Salem. Vol. II. Second Edition. W. & S. B.
Ives, Salem, and James Munroe & Co., Boston, 663 p.
Fonda, D. C. Jr, 1969, Eighteenth century Nantucket whaling. As
compiled from the original logs and journals of the Nantucket Atheneum
and the Nantucket Whaling Museum. Priv. printed for author, Nantucket,
Mass., 30 p.
Freedman, D. M., D, Rooney, M, Heitowit, and D. Carnivale. 1975.
The Staten Island Whaling Company. Staten Isl. Hist. 32(2): 13-16.
Freeman, F. 1858-1862. The history of Cape Cod: The annals of
Barnstable County and of its several towns, including the district of
Mashpee. In Two Volumes. Boston. Printed for the author by Geo. C. Rand
& Avery, vol. I, 1858, 804 p.; vol. 2, 1862, 804 p.
Gaskin, D. E. 1987. Updated status of the right whale, Eubalaena
glacialis, in Canada. Can. Field-Nat. 101(2):295-309.
--. 1991. An update on the status of the right whale, Eubalaena
glacialis, in Canada. Can. Field-Nat. 105(2): 198-205.
Goode, G. B. 1884. The whales and porpoises. Mammals. In G. B.
Goode (Editor), The fisheries and fishery industries of the United
States. Section I. Natural history of useful aquatic mammals with an
atlas of two hundred and seventy-seven plates, p. 7-32. Gov. Print.
Off., Wash.
--. (Editor). 1884-1887. The fisheries and fishery industries of
the United States, Five Sections in 7 vol, U.S. Comm. Fish Fish., Senate
Misc. Doc. 124, 47th Cong., 1st Sess., Gov. Print. Off., Wash. [cf.
Section V, vol. II, Plates, for figures we reproduced here].
Hamilton, P. 1995. A right whale up the Delaware Riven
Whalewatcher, J. Am. Cetacean Soc. 29(1):8-9.
Headlam, C. 1930. Calendar of state papers, colonial series,
America and West Indies, August 1717--December 1718 preserved in the
Public Record Office. Publ. by His Majesty's Stationery Off.,
Lond., 542 p.
Hedges, H. P., W. S. Pelletreau, and E. H. Foster. 1874. The first
book of records of the Town of Southampton with other ancient documents
of historic value, including all the writings in the Town Clerk's
office from 1639 to 1660; transcribed with notes and an introduction by
Wm. S. Pelletreau, and compiled by the undersigned committee, chosen at
town meeting, April 1st, 1873, and published at the expense of the town,
by its authority. John H. Hunt, Book and Job Print., Sag-Harbor, N.Y.,
177 p.
Hempstead, J. 1901. The diary of Joshua Hempstead of New London,
Connecticut ... from September 1711 to November 1758.... Collect. New
Lond. County Hist. Soc., 1, 750 p.
Holder, J. B. 1883. Article VI--The Atlantic right whales: A
Contribution, embracing an examination of (1) the exterior characters
and osteology of a cisarctic right whale--male. (2) The exterior
characters of a cisarctic right whale - female. (3) The osteology of a
cisarctic right whale--sex not known. To which is added a concise resume
of historical mention relating to the present and allied species. Bull.
Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 1(4):99-137.
Hurd, D. H. 1882. History of New London County, Connecticut, with
biographical sketches of many of its pioneers and prominent men. J.
Lewis & Co., Phila., 768 p.
Ingalls, L. 1987. Whaling prints in the Francis B. Lothrop
collection. Peabody Museum of Salem, Salem, Mass., 344 p.
International Whaling Commission. In press. Report of the workshop
on the comprehensive assessment of right whales: A worldwide comparison.
J. Cetacean Res. Manage.
Jennings, H. A. 1890. Provincetown or, odds and ends from the tip
end. A brief historical description of Provincetown, past and present;
old records; landing of the pilgrims; loss of the English frigate
Somerset; the Fire Department; J.C. Freeman Post 55, G.A.R.; Whales and
whaling; codfishing; Public Buildings; A few biographical sketches, with
portraits; incidents, anecdotes, stories of the place, etc., etc., etc.
illustrated with thirty-three engravings. Entered according to Act of
Congress, in the year 1890, by Herman A. Jennings, in the office of the
Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D.C., 212 p.
Josselyn, J. 1672. New-England's rarities discovered: In
birds, beasts, fishes, serpents, and plants of that country. Together
with the physical and chyrurgical remedies where with the natives
constantly use to cure their distempers, wounds, and sores. Also a
perfect description of an Indian squaw, in all her bravery: with a poem
not improperly conferr'd upon her. Lastly a chronological table of
the most remarkable passages in that country amongst the English.
Printed for G. Widdowes at Green Dragon in St. Pauls Church yard, Lond.,
114 p.
--. 1833. An account of two voyages to New-England. Collect. Mass.
Hist. Soc., Ser. 3, 3:211-354.
Katona, S. K., and S. D. Kraus. 1999. Efforts to conserve the North
Atlantic right whale. In J. R. Twiss, Jr., and R. R. Reeves (Editors),
Conservation and management of marine mammals, pp. 311-331. Smithson.
Inst. Press, Wash., D.C. 471 pp.
Knowlton, A. R., J. Sigurjonsson, J. N. Ciano, and S. D. Kraus.
1992. Long-distance movements of North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena
glacialis). Mar. Mamm. Sci. 8(4):397-405.
--, S. D. Kraus, and R. D. Kenney. 1994. Reproduction in North
Atlantic right whales (Eubaktena glacialis). Can. J. Zool. 72(7):
1297-1305.
Kraus, S. D. 1990. Rates and potential causes of mortality in North
Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis). Mar. Mamm. Sci.
6(4):278-291.
--, M. J. Crone, and A. R. Knowlton. 1988. The North Atlantic right
whale. In W. J. Chandler (Editor), Audubon Wildl. Rep.
1988/1989:684--698. Acad. Press, San Diego.
--, J. H. Prescott, A. R. Knowlton, and G. S. Stone. 1986.
Migration and calving of right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) in the
western Nort Atlantic. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm., Spec. Iss. 10:139-144.
--, --, P. V. Turnbull and R. R. Reeves. 1982. Preliminary notes on
the occurrence of the North Atlantic right whale, Eubalaena glacialis,
in the Bay of Fundy. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm. 32:407-411.
Kugler, R. C. 1980. The whale oil trade 1750-1775. Old Dartmouth
Hist. Sketch 79, 24 p. New Bedford, Mass.
Leaming, A., Jr. 1978. An interesting document concerning the
whaling industry and its decline. Cape May County Mag. Hist. Geneal.
7(6):487-490.
Leng, C. W., and W. T. Davis. 1930. Staten Island and its people: A
history 1609-1929. Lewis Hist. Publ. Co., Inc., N.Y., vol. 1, 529 p.;
vol. 2, p. 531-1060.
Lindquist, O. 1992. Comments concerning old whaling statistics: the
British whale oil measures gallons and tun, the Dutch and German
Quardeelen and the ratio between them. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm. 42:475-477.
Linsley, J. H. 1842. A catalogue of the Mammalia of Connecticut,
arranged according to their natural families. Am. J. Sci. Arts
43:345-354.
Lipton, B. 1975. Whaling days in New Jersey. Newark Mus. Q. 26(2
& 3):1-72.
Little, E. A. 1981. The Indian contribution to along-shore whaling
at Nantucket. Nantucket Hist. Assoc. Nantucket Algonquian Stud. 8:1-85.
--. 1988. Nantucket whaling in the early 18th century. In W. Cowan
(Editor), Pap. Nineteenth Algonquian Conf., p. 111-131, Carleton Univ.,
Ottawa.
-- and J. C. Andrews. 1982, Drift whales at Nantucket: The kindness
of Moshup. Man in the Northeast 23:17-38.
Littlefield, L. A. 1965. Fitting out a whaler. Old Dartmouth Hist.
Sketch 14 - first publ. June 22-1906. Bull. from Johnny Cake Hill,
Summer 1965, p. 5-12.
Lytle, T. G. 1984. Harpoons and other whalecraft. New Bedford,
Massachusetts, The Old Dart-mouth Hist. Soc. Whal. Mus., 256 p.
Macy, O. 1835. The history of Nantucket; being a compendious
account of the first settlement of the island by the English, together
with the rise and progress of the whale fishery; and other historical
facts relative to said island and its inhabitants. Hilliard, Gray, Co.,
Boston, 300 p.
Macy, R. 1707 [1710?] - 1760MS. Account Book No. 422, Peter Foulger
Mus., Nantucket.
Martin, K. R. 1975. Whalemen and whaleships of Maine. Mar. Res.
Soc., Bath, Maine, Harpswell Press, Brunswick, Maine, 71 p.
Mather, C. 1912. Diary of Cotton Mather 1709-1724. Mass. Hist.
Soc., Mass. Hist. Collect., 7th Ser., vol. 8.
Maury, M. F. 1852 et seq. Whale Chart of the World. Series F (Wind
and Current Charts) Sheet 1 (Washington, 1852), sheets 2-4 (n.d.).
Mead, J. G. 1986. Twentieth-century records of right whales
(Eubalaena glacialis) in the Northwestern Atlantic Ocean. Rep. Int.
Whal. Comm., Spec. Iss. 10:109-119.
-- and E. D Mitchell. 1984. Atlantic gray whales. In M. L. Jones,
S. L. Swart., and S. Leatherwood (Editors), The gray whale, Eschrichtius
robustus, p. 33-53. Acad. Press, Inc., Orlando, Fla.
Miner, F. D., and H. Miner. 1915. The diary of Manasseh Minor,
Stonington, Conn, 1696-1720. Publ. by authors, 196 p.
Mitchell, E. 1975. Trophic relationships and competition for food
in northwest Atlantic whales. Proc. Canadian Soc. Zool. 1974:123-133.
--, V. M. Kozicki, and R. R. Reeves. 1986a. Sightings of right
whales, Eubalaena glacialis, on the Scotian shelf, 1966-1972. Rep. Int.
Whaling Comm., Spec. Iss. 10:83-107.
-- and R. R. Reeves. 1983. Catch history, abundance, and present
status of Northwest Atlantic humpback whales. Rep. Int. Whaling Comm.,
Spec. Iss. 5:153-212.
--, and A. Evely. 1986b. Bibliography of Whale Killing Techniques.
Rep. Int. Whaling Comm., Spec. Iss. 7, 161 p.
Moore, S. E., and R. R. Reeves. 1993. Distribution and movement. In
J. J. Bums, J. J. Montague, and C. J. Cowles (Editors), The bowhead
whale, p. 313-386. Spec. Publ. 2, Soc. Mar. Mammal.
Morgan, C. W. 1841 MS. [Diary of] Charles W. Morgan. Collect. 27,
vol. 2, G. W. Blunt White Libr., Manuscr. Collect., Mystic Seaport Mus.,
Inc., Mystic, Conn.
NMFS. 1991. Final recovery plan for the northern right whale
(Eubalaena glacialis). Prep. by Right Whale Recovery Team for Natl. Mar.
Fish. Serv., NOAA, Silver Spring, Md., 86 p.
Norton, A. H. 1930. The mammals of Portland, Maine, and vicinity.
Proc. Portland Soc. Nat. Hist. 4(1): 1-199.
Oldmixon, J. 1708. The British Empire in America, containing the
history of the discovery, settlement, progress and present state of all
the British colonies, on the continent and islands of America. With
curious maps of the several places, done from the newest surveys. By
Herman Moll, geographer. In Two Volumes. Lond., Printed for John
Nicholson at the King's Arms in Little Britain, Benjamin Tooke, at
the Middle-Temple-Gate, Fleetstreet, and Richard Parker and Ralph Smith
under the Piazza of the Royal Exchange. Vol. 1,412 p.; Vol. 2, 382 p.
Parr, C. M. 1969. The voyages of David DeVries: Navigator and
adventurer. Thomas Y. Crowell Co., N.Y., 282 p.
Pease, Z. W. (Editor). 1927. The Diary of Samuel Rodman. A New
Bedford chronicle of thirty-seven years 1821-1859. Reynolds Printing
Co., New Bedford, Mass., 349 p.
Potter, E. R., and S. S. Rider. 1880. Some account of the bills of
credit or paper money of Rhode Island from the first issue in 1710, to
the final issue, 1786. Sidney S. Rider, R.I. Hist. Tracts 8, Providence.
Preston, H. W. 1932. Rhode Island and the sea. State of R.I.,
Providence Plantations, Off. Secretary of State, State Bur. Inf., 140 p.
Proulx, J-P. 1993. Basque whaling in Labrador in the 16th century.
Studies in Archaeology, Architecture and History. National Historic
Sites, Parks Service, Environ. Can., Ottawa, 108 p.
Pulsifer, D. (Editor). 1861. Laws. 1623-1682. Records of the colony
of New Plymouth in New England. From the Press of William White, Boston,
vol. 11.
Reeves, R. R. 1991. Pre-exploitation abundance of right whales.
Whalewatcher, J. Am. Cetacean Soc. 25(3):3-5.
-- and M. E Baao. 1985. Whaling in the Bay of Fundy. Whalewatcher,
J. Am. Cetacean Soc. 19(4):14-18.
--, J. G. Mead, and S. Katona. 1978. The right whale, Eubalaena
glacialis, in the western North Atlantic. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm.
28:303-312.
-- and E. Mitchell. 1983. Yankee whaling for right whales in the
North Atlantic Ocean. Whalewatcher, J. Am. Cetacean Soc. 17(4):3-8.
-- and --. 1986a. The Long Island, New York, right whale fishery:
1650-1924. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm., Spec. Iss. 10:201-220.
-- and --. 1986b. American pelagic whaling for right whales in the
North Atlantic. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm., Spec. Iss. 10:221-254.
-- and -- .1988. History of whaling in and near North Carolina.,
U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS 65, 28 p.
Rhoads, S. N. 1903. The mammals of Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
Privat. publ., Phila., 266 p.
Rice, D. W. 1998. Marine mammals of the world. Systematics and
distribution. Spec. Publ. 4, Soc. Mar. Mammal., Lawrence, KS, ix + 231
p.
Rogers, H., G. M. Carpenter, and E. Field. 1894a. Early records of
the Town of Providence. Vol. 6. City Counc. Providence, 328 p.
-- , --, and --. 1894b. Early Records of the Town of Providence.
Vol. 7. City of Providence, 264 p.
Ross, P. 1902. A history of Long Island: From its earliest
settlement to the present time. Vol. 1. Lewis Publ. Co., N.Y.
Ross, W. G. 1993. Commercial whaling in the North Atlantic sector.
In J. J. Burns, J. J. Montague, and C. J. Cowles (Editors), The bowhead
whale, p. 511-561. Soc. Mar. Mammal., Spec. Publ. 2, 787 p.
Rotch, W. 1916. Memorandum written by William Rotch in the
eightieth year of his age. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, 89 p.
St. John de Crevecoeur, J. H. 1782. Letters from an American
farmer; describing certain provincial situations, manners and customs,
not generally known; and conveying some idea of the late and present
interior circumstances of the British Colonies in North America. Written
for the information of a friend in England, by J. Hector St. John [de
Crevecoeur], a farmer in Pennsylvania. Printed for Thomas Davies in
Russell Street, Covent-Garden, Lond., and Lockyer Davis, Holborn, 318 p.
Scammon, C. M. 1874. The marine mammals of the north-western coast
of North America, together with an account of the American
whale-fishery. John H. Carmany and Company, San Francisco.
Scarff, J. E. 1986. Historic and present distribution of the right
whale (Eubalaena glacialis) in the eastern North Pacific south of 50
[degrees] N and east of 180 [degrees] W. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm., Spec.
Iss. 10:43-63.
Schaeff, C. M., S. D. Kraus, M. W. Brown, J. S. Perkins, R. Payne
and B. White. 1997. Comparison of genetic variability of North and South
Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena), using DNA fingerprinting. Can. J.
Zool. 75:1073-1080.
Schevill, W. E. 1986. Report of the workshop on the status of right
whales, appendix 5. Right whale nomenclature. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm.,
Spec. Iss. 10:19.
-- and K. E. Moore. 1983. Townsend's unmapped North Atlantic
right whales (Eubalaena glacialis). Breviora, No. 476:1-8.
--, W. A. Watkins, and K. E. Moore. 1986. Status of Eubalaena
glacialis off Cape Cod. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm., Spec. Iss. 10:79-82.
Shearman, A., Jr. 1876. Memoranda in relation to the whale fishery
and the commerce of New Bedford. In W. W. Crapo, Historical address ...
delivered on the occasion of the celebration in New Bedford of the
fourth of July, 1876. To which are added an account of the celebration,
and an appendix, p. 67-70. Centennial in New Bedford, New Bedford, 175
p.
Sherman, S. C., J. M. Downey, V. M. Adams, and H. Pasternack. 1986.
Whaling logbooks and journals 1613-1927: An inventory of manuscript
records in public collections. Garland Publ., Inc., N.Y., 469 p.
Shurtleff, N. B. (Editor). 1854. Records of the governor and
company of the Massachusetts Bay in New England. Vol. IV. - Part I.
1650-1660. William White, Printer to the Commonwealth, Boston, 518 p.
-- . 1855, Records of the colony of New Plymouth in New England.
Court orders: Vol. IV. 1661-1668. William White, Printer to the
Commonwealth, Boston, 218 p.
--. 1857. Records of the colony of New Plymouth in New England.
Miscellaneous records. 1633-1689. William White, Printer to the
Commonwealth, Boston, 283 p.
Smith, Capt. J. 1624. The generall historie of Virginia,
New-England and the Summer Isles: with the names of the adventurers,
planters, and governours from their first beginning in 1584 to this
present 1624. With the Proceedings of those severall colonies and the
accidents that befell them in all their journyes and discoveries....
London. Printed by I.D. and I.H. for Michael Sparkes, Lond., p. 1-96,
105-248. [Facs. copy, publ. 1966 by World Publ. Co., Cleveland, Ohio.]
Smith, N. W. P. 1922. The Provincetown book. Tolman Print, Inc.,
Brockton, Mass., 260 p.
Smith, P. C. F. (Editor). 1973. The journals of Ashley Bowen
(1728-1813) of Marblehead. Publ. of Colonial Soc. Mass., Vol. XLIV
Collect,, Boston.
Sporri, E C. 1677. Americanische reiss-beschreibung nach den
Caribes Insseln, und Neu-Engelland. Zurich. [Transl. avail, in
Bridenbaugh, C. 1974. Fat mutton and liberty of conscience: society in
Rhode Island, 1636-1690. Providence, App, V, p. 144-145.]
Stackpole, E. A. 1953. The sea-hunters. The New England whalemen
during two centuries 1635-1835. J. B. Lippincott Co., Phila., 510 p.
--. 1972. Whales and destiny. The rivalry between America, France,
and Britain for control of the southern whale fishery, 1785-1825. Univ.
Mass. Press, Amherst, 427 p.
--. 1982. The last whale-chase off Nantucket. Hist. Nantucket
29(3): 12-16.
Starbuck, A. 1878. History of the American whale fishery from its
earliest inception to the year 1876. Rep. U.S. Comm. Fish Fish., pt. 4,
768 p.
--. 1924. The history of Nantucket County, Island and town
including genealogies of first settlers. C. E. Goodspeed & Co.,
Boston, 871 p.
Starr, W. H. 1876. A centennial historical sketch of the town of
New London. Power Press of George E. Starr, New Lond., 96 p.
Stone, G. S., S. D. Kraus, J. H. Prescott, and K. W. Hazard. 1988.
Significant aggregations of the endangered right whale, Eubalaena
glacialis, on the continental shelf of Nova Scotia. Can. Field-Nat.
102:471-474.
Taber, P. 1745. [Letter from Philip Taber addressed to Tucker
Taber, Dartmouth, Massachusetts], 6 December 1745, Sandy Hook, N.J. Old
Dartmouth Hist. Soc., New Bedford, Mass., Mss 56, Ser. T, Sub-ser. 5,
folder 1.
Thacher, J. 1832. History of the town of Plymouth; from its first
settlement in 1620, to the year 1832. Marsh, Capen & Lyon, Boston,
382 p.
Thomas, G. 1952. [The commodities of Cape May County are oyl and
whale-Bone, ... --Gabriel Thomas 1698).] Cape May County Mag. Hist.
Geneal. 3(6):227.
Townsend, C. H. 1935. The distribution of certain whales as shown
by logbook records of American whaleships. Sci. Contrib. N.Y. Zool.
Soc., Zoologica 19(1): 1-50.
True, F. W. 1904. The whalebone whales of the western North
Atlantic compared with those occurring in European waters with some
observations on the species of the North Pacific. Smithson. Contrib.
Knowl. 33, 332 p.
Trumbull, J. H. 1850. The public records of the colony of
Connecticut, prior to the union with New Haven Colony, May, 1665;
transcribed and published, (in accordance with a resolution of the
General Assembly,) under the supervision of the Secretary of State, with
occasional notes, and an appendix. Brown & Parsons, Hartford, 604 p.
Ulmer, E A., Jr. 1961. New Jersey's whales and dolphins. New
Jersey Nature News 16(3):80-93.
Wakeham, W. 1913. Forty-sixth annual report of the Department of
Marine and Fisheries, 1912-13, fisheries. Can. Dep. Mar. Fish., Sess.
Pap. 22, 4 George V, A. 1914, Ottawa.
Watkins, W. A., and W. E. Schevill. 1982. Observations of right
whales, Eubalaena glacialis, in Cape Cod waters. Fish. Bull.
80(4):875-880.
Watson, J. E 1855. Annals of Philadelphia and Pennsylvania, in the
olden time; being a collection of memoirs, anecdotes, and incidents of
the city and its inhabitants, and of the earliest settlements of the
island part of Pennsylvania, from the days of the founders. Intended to
preserve the recollections of olden time, and to exhibit society in its
changes of manners and customs, and the city and country in their local
changes and improvements. Embellished with engravings, by T. H. Mumford.
In Two Volumes. Parry and McMillan, Successors to A. Hart (late Carey
and Hart). Vol. 1,591 p.; vol. 2,609 p.
Weiss, H. B., H. R. Kemble, and M. T. Carre. 1974. Whaling in New
Jersey. N.J. Agric. Soc., Trenton, 148 p.
WSL. 1834-1914. Whalemen's Shipping List, and Merchants'
Transcript. New Bedford, Mass. Vol. 1, no. 1 (17 March 1843) to Vol. 72,
no. 52 (29 December 1914).
Wheeler, R.A. 1900. History of the Town of Stonington, County of
New London, Connecticut, from its first settlement in 1649 to 1900, with
a genealogical register of Stonington families. Press of the Day Publ.
Co., New Lond., Conn., 754 p.
Williamson, S. 1951. The Hughes family of Cape May. Cape May County
Mag. Hist. Geneal. 3(5): 177-179.
Winsor, J. 1849. History of the Town of Duxbury, Massachusetts,
with genealogical registers. Crosby & Nichols, Boston; Samuel G.
Drake, Cornhill, 360 p.
Winthrop, J. 1825. The history of New England from 1630 to 1649. By
John Winthrop, Esq. first Governour of the Colony of the Massachusetts
Bay. From his original manuscripts. With notes to illustrate the civil
and ecclesiastical concerns, the geography, settlement and institutions
of the country, and the lives and manners of the principal planters.
Vol. 1 by James Savage. Printed by Phelps and Farnham, Boston, 424 p.
Winthrop, W. 1892. [Letter from Wait Winthrop to his brother John
Winthrop, dated 27 January 1699, Boston.] Collect. Mass. Hist. Soc.,
Boston, 6th Ser., vol. 5, p. 54-55.
Wood, D. N.d. Dennis Wood abstracts of whaling voyages. Vol. 1-5,
1831-1862. [Microfilm rolls 298 and 299, purchased from] New Bedford
Free Public Libr., New Bedford, Mass.
Wood, H., II. 1968. Sagaponack whalers who settled Cape May County.
Cape May County Mag. Hist. Geneal. 6(5):272.
Woodby, D. A., and D. B. Botkin. 1993. Stock sizes prior to
commercial whaling. In J. J. Burns, J. J. Montague, and C. J. Cowles
(Editors), The bowhead whale, p. 387-407. Spec. Publ. 2, Soc. Mar.
Mammal.
Randall R. Reeves is with Okapi Wildlife Associates, 27 Chandler
Lane, Hudson, Quebec, J0P 1H0, Canada (rrreeves@total.net). Jeffrey M.
Breiwick is with the National Marine Mammal Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries
Science Center, NMFS, NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way N.E., Seattle, WA 98115
(jeff.breiwick@noaa.gov). Edward D. Mitchell was with the Arctic
Biological Station, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada and now
is with the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition
Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 (edmnhm@ix.netcom.com).