Nonlinear stability of a single-layer hybrid grid shell.
Cai, Jianguo ; Xu, Yixiang ; Feng, Jian 等
1. Introduction
As is well known, shells still play an important role in the
progress of bearing structures, particularly the single-layer
reticulated shell which carries its loads mainly by compressive forces.
Therefore stability analysis is an intricate and important problem in
designing reticulated shells. The single-layer reticulated shells can be
regarded as a mixture of slab structure and continuum shell thus showing
the stability failure of both types and even combinatorial modes
(Bulenda, Knippers 2001).
The non-linear buckling analysis procedures for single-layer
reticulated shells based upon non-linear finite element (FE) analysis
have been developed to trace the equilibrium path by many researchers
(Forman, Hutchinson 1970; Meek, Tan 1984; Borri, Spinelli 1998; Gosowski
2003; Gioncu 1995, 2003; Nie 2003). The structural behaviour of the
shell structures during the whole loading process can be revealed by the
load-deflection curves, by which the buckling load can be predicted. The
elastic stability of the hybrid grid shell has been well studied by
Bulenda and Knippers (2001). However, the analysis of elasto-plastic
stability is much more complicated than the elastic analysis, since the
elasto-plastic analysis involves both geometrical and material
non-linearities. The elasto-plastic stability of the single-layer
reticulated shells has attracted more and more attentions of researchers
recently (Suzuki et al. 1992; Nee, Haldar 1988; Luo 1991; Kato et al.
2000; Fan et al. 2010a, b).
Usually, triangular or quadrilateral meshes can be used in shell
lattice structures. With the development of modern building industry,
the appeal of glass roofs grows because of its aesthetical advantage of
being translucent. Shell structures with quadrangular mesh are one of
the best candidates for the transparent glass roofs. However, when
opting for a quadrilateral mesh, it should be noted that the mesh is
much less stiff in the plane compared to the triangular one. Moreover,
the stability of shells becomes most dependent on the joint rigidity.
These serious shortfalls in structural performance outweigh the apparent
benefits in reducing the number and length of members used and might
limit the structure to applications with short spans and low loading.
Cables are light and can provide well-defined transmission of
forces. They can also been inserted into a structural system with a
rational layout of members so as to make the best use of individual
material properties (Hosozawa et al. 1999). To achieve high performance
of the lattice shell, its quadrangular mesh should be stiffened by
diagonal cables (Schlaich, Schober 1996, 1997, 1999, 2002; Schlaich
2004), as shown in Fig. 1. Note, cables under compression will not
become slack when pre stressed before applying external loads.
Due to its attractive mechanical properties, the hybrid grid shell
has been widely used, e.g. the Word Trade Center Dresden and Atrium roof
of Quartier 203 in Berlin (Schlaich, Schober 1999), the Roof of the
Museum of Hamburgische Geschichte, and the glass roof of New Guangzhou
Railway station in China. The geometrical non-linear finite element
analysis which considers imperfections of different shapes and scales
was performed to study the stability of a hybrid grid shell (Bulenda,
Knippers 2001). The principle of the cable pre-stress was investigated
by Schlaich (2004) based on a four-bar linkage diagonally stiffened by
cables. Glymph et al. (2004) studied the constructability of a hybrid
shell using planar quadrilateral glass facets for the Jerusalem Museum
of Tolerance project. They described a simple but robust geometric
method for achieving the structure by incorporating the necessary
geometric principles into a computational parametric framework using the
CATIA Version 5 system. Del Guerra and Froli (2009) proposed to roof two
internal courtyards of the main building of the Engineering Faculty at
the University of Pisa by means of thin flat lattice shells stiffened by
a grid of steel cables. The form-finding process, construction
techniques, and some case studies were concluded by Paoli (2007). He
also investigated the development of high performance software and the
using of new materials.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
Although the structural form is used in some projects, there is
little research work reported about the structural behavior of the
hybrid grid shells. With the fast development of computer technology and
the availability of advanced FE software, it is now possible to conduct
a comprehensive study on the stability of the hybrid grid shell through
geometrical and material non-linear analyses. This paper shows how to
perform a geometrical and material non-linear finite element analysis by
using ANSYS to investigate the stability of the hybrid grid shell. The
imperfection sensitivity including the pattern and scale of
imperfections will be investigated. Additionally, the effects of other
factors such as the geometrical and structural parameters and the
asymmetrical distribution of loads will also be taken into consideration
in this paper.
2. Design model
Quadrangular mesh constructions require fewer machining operations
on the glass and fewer mullions if the quadrilateral facets of the
surface structure are maintained planar. Therefore, translation surfaces
are given in Glymph et al. (2004) to guarantee the geometric planarity
of facets in a quadrangular mesh system. Translating a spatial curve
against another spatial curve will create a spatial surface consisting
solely of planar quadrangular mesh. In this paper, to fulfill the equal
length requirement, two identical parabolas are chosen to generate the
surface. The included angle between the two planes is set to
60[degrees]. Finally, the surface is delimitated horizontally by
intersecting a plane n and thus gives a hybrid grid shell. The
generation of the shell is illustrated in Fig. 2.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
The design example that is used in this study is shown in Fig. 3.
The major axis span and rise of the shell structure are 38 m and 6 m,
respectively. All nodes at the perimeter are fixed to the support. Many
types of connections are commonly used in space structure construction
such as welded hollow ball connections and bolt ball connections. The
joints are assumed to be rigid in this study. The length of the
principal single-layer lattice member is 2.0 m, which is made of steel
with a Young's modulus of 206 GPa, and the box cross-section is 60
mm* 30 mm* 2 mm (height x width x thickness). The diameter of cables is
10 mm and the Young's modulus is 180 GPa. The initial stress of
cables is 100 MPa.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
The symmetrical load case g+s (dead load +snow load) has been taken
into account in all computations. The dead load g consists of a
self-weight of 0.5 kN/[m.sup.2] for glass. The self-weight of all beams
and cables are calculated by the software. The snow load is applied to
the top surface of the structure in the vertical direction with a
magnitude of 0.5 kN/[m.sup.2]. SURF 154, which may be used for various
load and surface effect applications in the software ANSYS, was used to
add dead and snow loads in the vertical direction.
The Finite Element Analysis software ANSYS is employed in all
structural analyses. The geometrical nonlinearity was considered by the
input "NLGEOM, ON". The constitutive model of the steel was
perfectly elastoplastic, with the yield strength of 345 MPa.
Tension-only element LINK10 is used to model cables and BEAM 189 is
chosen to simulate steel beams.
3. Stability behavior of hybrid grid shells
The elasto-plastic stability analyses of the hybrid grid shell and
the corresponding single-layer lattice shell are carried out using
ANSYS. The Newton-Raphson method is used to obtain the total
load-displacement equilibrium path. The load factor-displacement curves
for the hybrid grid shell and the corresponding single-layer lattice
shell are illustrated in Fig. 4. The load is plotted against the
displacement of a node in the area of maximum deformation.
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
It is clear from the figure that cables do increase the stability
behavior of grid shells. The buckling capacity of the hybrid grid shell
is higher than that of the single-layer lattice shell. The critical
buckling load factors, which are defined as the ratio of the critical
buckling load to the design load given in Section 2, obtained from Fig.
4 are 5.976 and 0.636 for the two structures, respectively. It can also
be found that the maximum displacement of the lattice shell is about
twice that of the hybrid structure.
4. Influence of asymmetrical loads
Asymmetrical load case is an important factor that affects the
elasto-plastic buckling capacity of hybrid grid shells. One type of
asymmetrical load is the half-span load which can be resulted during
construction or from snow. The asymmetrical load case g+s/2 (g - dead
load and s - snow load, uniformly distributed over half of the span) is
considered in this study. The symmetrical load case is denoted as Load
1, and the asymmetrical load case Load 2.
Fig. 5 shows the load factor versus displacement curves for typical
nodes under the asymmetrical load case. The critical buckling load
factor obtained from Fig. 5 is 6.301, which is slightly higher than that
for symmetrical loads. It can be concluded that. This is because the
asymmetrical distribution of load poses limited effect on the buckling
load obtained from the geometrical and material non-linear analysis and
the total asymmetrical loads are smaller than the symmetrical loads.
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
5. Geometric imperfections
Shell structures are very sensitive to geometric imperfections
which are inevitable during fabrication. There are several types of
imperfections in all practical structures: imperfections of the system
(e.g. non-rigid joints); structural imperfections (tolerances of the
cross-section area, non-homogeneous materials, etc.), loading
imperfections, and geometrical imperfections (Bulenda, Knippers 2001).
According to the Eurocode 3 (2007) and the Chinese code JGJ61 (2003),
the geometrical imperfection should be taken into account in the
non-linear analysis in order to model the structure more realistically.
Several methods are available to analyze geometrical imperfections,
e.g. the random imperfection mode method (Yamada 2001), the consistent
imperfection mode method (Chen, Shen 1993). In the former method,
samples distributed with randomly generated imperfections are studied.
The sample with the smallest buckling capacity is identified, and the
corresponding buckling capacity is treated as the approximated critical
capacity of the system. For the latter method, the imperfection
distribution is assumed to be consistent with deflected shapes, such as
eigenvalue buckling modes. The consistent imperfection mode method is
used in this paper. Then the shape and the scale of the geometric
imperfection will be discussed.
5.1. Shape of the imperfection
Normally, the first eigenvalue buckling mode is chosen as the
imperfection shape. This is also called the fundamental mode
imperfection method (JGJ61 2003) or the eigenmode imperfection method
(EN 1993-1-6 2007). Generally, the buckling capacity that is calculated
by the fundamental mode imperfection method is lower than those given by
higher eigenvalue buckling modes. However, for a pre-stressed space
structure, Zhang et al. (2006) stated that the buckling capacity based
on other eigenvalue buckling modes may be the lowest. On the other hand,
Bulenda and Knippers (2001) suggested using the final buckling shape as
a geometrical imperfection.
Thus, we have set up the following shapes of imperfections for
hybrid grid shells: (1) the first several eigen-value buckling modes;
(2) the displacement shape of the loaded structure obtained from a
geometrical non-linear analysis. Both imperfections are easy to compute
and therefore can be often used by engineers.
Eigenvalue buckling modes can be obtained by the eigenvalue
buckling analysis. The analysis predicts the theoretical buckling
capacity (the bifurcation load) of an ideal linear elastic structure.
Although imperfections and material non-linearities often prevent most
practical structures from achieving the theoretical elastic buckling
capacity, the eigenvalue buckling analysis is still a very useful tool
to estimate the critical load and buckling modes for single-layer
reticulated shells. The buckling results are summarized in Fig. 6. It
can be found that the asymmetrical distribution of load poses limited
effect on the critical load of the hybrid structure. Some buckling modes
of the structure under both loads are shown in Fig. 7. It is clear from
the figure that the first three buckling modes are local modes. The
instability of the hybrid structure under the asymmetric load case
occurs in the half span.
[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]
For the second method of imposing imperfection, using the large
deformation and elastic analysis will give deformed shapes of the hybrid
grid shell under two load cases shown in Fig. 8. The deformed shapes
will be then imported as imperfections in the elasto-plastic analyses.
5.2. Scale of the imperfection
The scaling of the imperfection is as important as its shape.
Generally, the span of the structure is taken as a reference scale for
the imperfection size (EN 1993-1-6 2007). According to the
specifications of the Chinese lattice shell (JGJ61 2003), the maximum
geometric imperfection that is caused by construction should be
restricted within span/300.
As expected, the buckling capacity of the structure decreases when
the maximum nodal displacement due to the geometric imperfection
increases. However, for a hybrid structure, the buckling capacity when
imposing an imperfection with the maximum nodal displacement of span/300
may not be the lowest (Zhang et al. 2006). Therefore, we need to vary
the imperfection scale in order to assess the imperfection sensitivity
of the structure.
[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 8 OMITTED]
5.3. Results of different imperfection shapes
For modeling of the geometrical imperfections in ANSYS package, we
applied them in the form of geometric (stress-free) modifications on the
model. For this reason, we obtained the imperfection model firstly and
then by using the "Update Geom" order, we give values to the
magnificent factor. In fact by the resulted displacement of different
buckling resolution, a new model with geometrical imperfection was
obtained.
Figs 9 and 10 show the load-displacement curves for different
hybrid grid shells, including the perfect structure as well as the
structures imposed on six different imperfect shapes. The load is
plotted against a nodal displacement in the area of maximum deformation.
The maximum imperfections of all shapes have been scaled to span/300.
For the model in this study, the major axis span is 32 m, and thus the
maximum geometric imperfection is 106.7 mm.
The load-displacement curves for the structure with imperfections
based on eigenmodes or deformed shapes of the loading cases show the
similar trend with the perfect structure. It is clear from the figure
that the failure load of the hybrid structure under both loads is
rapidly reduced in the presence of geometric imperfections. The lowest
buckling load is predicted with the tenth eigenvalue buckling mode. In
this case the failure loads are 1.334 and 1.954 times the design loads
for the symmetric and asymmetric load case, respectively, yielding 77%
and 70% reduction in strength. Therefore, our comparison shows large
influence of different shapes of imperfections on the failure load under
both loads. The tenth eigenvalue buckling mode shows the largest
reduction of the failure load compared to imperfection based on other
buckling shapes.
[FIGURE 9 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 10 OMITTED]
Taking into account of the complexity of implementation and the
previous results, the tenth eigenmode imperfection can be
straightforwardly obtained by a linearelastic eigenvalue buckling
analysis and is shown as the most critical imperfection shape of the
imperfection shapes considered in this paper. This imperfection shape is
thus employed in all the following analyses.
5.4. Results of different imperfection scales
An elasto-plastic buckling analysis is carried out for the hybrid
grid shell with geometric imperfection imposed. The failure loads
corresponding to different scales of the tenth eigenmode are computed.
Fig. 11 shows the imperfection sensitivity of the hybrid structure. It
can be seen from the figure that the failure loads of the hybrid
structure decrease when the positive imperfection scale increases or the
negative imperfection scale decreases, i.e. when the structure is
increasing its nodal deformation due to imperfection. The largest
reduction rate is found around the perfect structure. Here, imposing a
very small imperfection on the perfect system will lead to a big change
of the failure load. Thus, the hybrid structure should be regarded as
highly sensitive to imperfections. It should be noted that from the
symmetry of the figure when the structure is under both load cases, the
failure load reduces when the absolute value of imperfection scale
increases.
[FIGURE 11 OMITTED]
6. Parametric study of the buckling capacity
6.1. Influence of the rise-to-span ratio
The elasto-plastic analyses have been carried out based on sample
structures with different rises (keeping the span constant). The failure
loads are shown in Fig. 12. The rise-to-span ratio, which is defined as
the ratio of the rise to the major axis span, corresponds to 0.16, 0.22,
and 0.30, respectively. For the structure under the symmetrical load
g+s, an increase in rise-to-span ratio will result in an increase in the
failure load. A similar trend can be found when the structure is under
the asymmetrical load g+s/2. Therefore, the rise-to-span ratio is a key
factor of the stability of the hybrid grid shell.
[FIGURE 12 OMITTED]
6.2. Influence of the cross-sections of steel beams
When the geometry of the structure is identified, the cross-section
of steel beams is an important factor that affects the buckling capacity
of the hybrid grid shell. Fig. 13 shows the variations of the failure
load under both load cases with respect to the axial stiffness and the
flexural stiffness of steel beams. It is clear from the figure that the
beam section influences the failure load significantly. The failure load
increases with an increase of the axial stiffness and flexural stiffness
of beams. When the beam axial stiffness and flexural stiffness are
reduced by about 35% and 70% from the basic model, the failure loads
decrease by 55% and 45% for symmetrical and asymmetrical loads,
respectively. Setting the beam axial stiffness and flexural stiffness to
2.0 and 3.5 times as those of the standard model, it doubles the failure
loads for each load case, respectively. Therefore, the results show the
beam section improves the stability performance of the hybrid grid shell
notably.
[FIGURE 13 OMITTED]
In order to derive a relationship between the ratio of the bending
and axial stiffness and the buckling behavior, the cross-sections are
set to 42 mm* 21.4 mm* 3 mm, 49.2 mm* 24.6 mm* 2.5 mm, 60 mm* 30 mm* 2
mm, and 73.8 mm* 36.9 mm* 1.6 mm, respectively. The axial stiffness
(areas of the cross-sections) is almost the same. However, the bending
stiffness is different. Fig. 14 shows the relation between the failure
load and the bending/axial stiffness ratio. It is clear from the figure
that the failure load increases with an increase of the ratio of the
bending and axial stiffness. However, the trend becomes slow when the
ratio is larger.
[FIGURE 14 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 15 OMITTED]
6.3. Influence of cables
The pre-stress and area of cables are also important factors that
affect the elasto-plastic buckling behavior of the hybrid grid shell.
The failure load against the diameter of cables at the specified cable
pre-stress of 100 MPa is shown in Fig. 15. The diameters of cables
correspond to 6 mm, 8 mm, 10 mm, 15 mm, 18 mm and 21 mm in Fig. 15,
respectively. For the structure under the symmetrical load g+s, if the
cable diameter is smaller than 18 mm, an increase in the cable diameter
will result in an increase in the failure load. If the cable diameter is
greater than 18 mm, a higher cable area gives a lower failure load. A
similar trend can be found when the structure is under asymmetrical load
g+s/2. Thus, it is interesting to note that there exits an optimal value
of cable diameters for a specific hybrid grid shell.
To study the effect of different pre-stress values directly, the
initial stresses are set to 50 MPa, 80 MPa, 100 MPa and 150 MPa,
respectively. The failure load under both load cases versus the
pre-stress of cables is shown in Fig. 16. It can be seen that the
failure load increases with the increasing of the cable pre-stress. For
the structure under asymmetrical loads, the differences in failure loads
are very small. For the pre-stresses considered in Fig. 16, the range of
the variation of failure loads is within 10%. However, for the structure
under symmetrical loads, when the pre-stress increase from 50 MPa to 100
MPa, the failure load increases significantly by 55%.
[FIGURE 16 OMITTED]
Therefore the influence of the cable pre-stress on the failure load
is significant. It is essential to choose a proper cable diameter and
prestress for a hybrid grid shell.
6.4. Influence of boundary conditions
In all aforementioned cases, the supports of hybrid grid shells are
regarded as fixed. The elasto-plastic stability of hybrid grid shells
with pinned supports is discussed in this section. The load-displacement
curves with fixed and pinned supports under symmetrical and asymmetrical
loads are shown in Fig. 17.
[FIGURE 17 OMITTED]
Fig. 17 indicates that there is a small difference of failure loads
between fixed and pinned support shells. The failure load factor of the
structure with pinned supports is 5.29 and 6.24 for the two load cases,
respectively. Note the difference of the failure load with pinned
supports between the two load cases is little. As a result, the effect
of support conditions on the elasto-plastic stability is slight in the
design of the hybrid grid shells.
7. Conclusions
The buckling capacity of the hybrid grid shell was investigated in
this paper. By taking into consideration geometrical and material
non-linearity using elasto-plastic analyses, the behavior of hybrid
structures and the corresponding single-layer lattice shell was found
significantly different. Then the effects of different geometrical,
structural, and load parameters on the failure loads were studied. By
comparing the results of analyses, conclusions can be drawn as follows:
1. The effect of cables on the stability of the structure is
significant. The buckling capacity of the hybrid grid shell is much
higher than that of the single-layer lattice shell.
2. The stability of a hybrid grid shell is non-sensitive to the
asymmetrical distribution of load.
3. The hybrid structure is highly imperfection sensitive and the
reduction of the failure load due to imperfections can be considerable.
Furthermore, when imposing imperfections, the proper shape and scale of
the imperfection will effectively affect the performance of the
structure. The results show that the tenth eigenmode is the most
critical imperfection shape to the example structure given in this
paper. Furthermore, the largest reduction rate of failure load is found
for the perfect structure. Thus, a very small imperfection on the
perfect system will lead to a big change of the failure load.
4. The analysis results show that under a particular span, the
buckling capacity increases with the rise-to-span ratio. Moreover,
increasing the cross-section of steel beams notably improves the
stability performance of the structure. The failure load of the hybrid
grid shell initially increases with the increase of the cable diameter
and then decreases afterwards. Therefore, there exists an optimal cable
diameter resulting in a relatively high buckling capacity for a specific
cable pre-stress. Furthermore, the influence of the cable pre-stress on
the failure load is also significant. A proper cable diameter and
prestress for a hybrid grid shell are required during the design.
5. The effect of the boundary conditions on the failure load is
found limited.
Demand for glass roof system with longer span is increasing, and
further research is required to improve the structural form in terms of
static, dynamic, and stability capacity. The above conclusions are drawn
from the work of this paper that has not considered the eccentricity and
semi-rigidity of joints. Further investigations addressing these details
are needed in future.
Acknowledgements
The work presented in this article was supported by the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 50908044, 51278116),
Jiangsu "Six Top Talent" Program of China (Grant No.
07-F-008), Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of
Southeast University (Grant No. YBJJ0817), and A Project Funded by the
Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education
Institutions. The first author would like to thank the China Scholarship
Council for sponsoring his stay at the California Institute of
Technology. The authors also deeply appreciate the remarks and
suggestions of anonymous referees, which led to improvements in this
paper.
doi:10.3846/13923730.2012.723325
References
Borri, C.; Spinelli, P. 1998. Buckling and post-buckling behavior
of single layer reticulated shells affected by random imperfections,
Computers & Structures 30(4): 937-943.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(88)90131-9
Bulenda, T.; Knippers, J. 2001. Stability of grid shells, Computers
& Structures 79(12): 1161-1174.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00011-6
Chen, X.; Shen, S. Z. 1993. Complete load-deflection response and
initial imperfection analysis of single-layer lattice dome,
International Journal of Space Structures 8(4): 271-278.
EN 1993-1-6:2007 Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1-6:
Strength and stability of shell structures. European Committee for
Standardization, 2007.
Fan, F.; Cao, Z.; Shen, S. 2010a. Elasto-plastic stability of
single-layer reticulated shells, Thin-Walled Structures 48(10-11):
827-836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016Zj.tws.2010.04.004
Fan, F.; Wang, D.; Zhi, X.; Shen, S. 2010b. Failure modes of
reticulated domes subjected to impact and the judgment, Thin-Walled
Structures 48(2): 143-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2009.08.005
Forman, S. E.; Hutchinson, J. W. 1970. Buckling of reticulated
shell structures, International Journal of Solids and Structures 6(7):
909-932. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(70)90004-1
Del Guerra, G.; Froli, M. 2009. Proposal to roof the courtyards of
an historical building in Pisa with glass and steel grid shells form
finding and stability problems, Journal of Architectural Engineering
ASCE 15(2): 62-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2009)15:
2(62)
Glymph, J.; Shelden, D.; Ceccato, C.; Mussel, J.; Schober, H. 2004.
A parametric strategy for free-form glass structures using quadrilateral
planar facets, Automation in Construction 13(2): 187-202.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2003.09.008
Gioncu, V. 1995. Buckling of reticulated shells state-of-the-art,
International Journal of Space Structures 10(1): 1-16.
Gioncu, V. 2003. Stability theory: Principles and methods for
design of steel structures, Journal of Constructional Steel Research
59(2): 269-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(02)00020-2
Gosowski, B. 2003. Spatial stability of braced thin-walled members
of steel structures, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 59(7):
839-865. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(02)00093-7
Hosozawa, O.; Shimamura, K.; Mizutani, T. 1999. The role of cables
in large span spatial structures: introduction of recent space
structures with cables in Japan, Engineering Structures 21(8): 795-804.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00032-7
JGJ61-2003 Technical specification for reticulated shells. Beijing:
China Architecture Industry Press, 2003 [in Chinese].
Kato, S.; Yamashita, T.; Ueki, T. 2000. Evaluation of
elasto-plastic buckling strength of two-way grid shells using continuum
analogy, in Sixth Asian Pacific conference on shell and spatial
structures, October, 2000, Seoul, Korea. International Association for
Shell and Spatial Structures, 105-114.
Luo, Y. F. 1991. Elasto-plastic stability and loading
complete-process research of reticulated shells. PhD Thesis. Tongji
University, China (in Chinese).
Meek, J. L.; Tan, H. S. 1984. Geometrically non-linear analysis of
space frames by an incremental iterative technique, Computer Methods in
Applied Mechanics and Engineering 47(3): 261-282.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(84)90079-3
Nee, K.-M.; Haldar, A. 1988. Elastoplastic nonlinear post-buckling
analysis of partially restrained space structure, Computer Methods in
Applied Mechanics and Engineering 71(1): 69-97.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(88)90096-5
Nie, G. H. 2003. On the buckling of imperfect squarely-reticulated
shallow spherical shells supported by elastic media, Thin-Walled
Structures 41(1): 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8231(02)00069-1
Paoli, C. 2007. Past and future of grid shell structures. Master
Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.
Schlaich, J.; Schober, H. 1996. Glass-covered gird-shells,
Structural Engineering International 6(2): 88-90.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2749/101686696780495716
Schlaich, J.; Schober, H. 1997. Glass roof for the Hippo house at
the Berlin zoo, Structural Engineering International 7(4): 252-254.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2749/101686697780494581
Schlaich, J.; Schober, H. 1999. Recent glass roofs, Journal of the
International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures 40: 193-205.
Schlaich, J.; Schober, H. 2002. Design principles of glass roofs,
in Proc. of the International Symposium on Lightweight Structures in
Civil Engineering, 24-28 June, 2002, Warsaw, Poland, 815-827.
Schlaich, J. 2004. Concept design of light structures, Journal of
the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures 45:
157-168.
Suzuki, T.; Ogawa, T.; Ikarashi, K. 1992. Elasto-plastic buckling
analysis of rigidly jointed single layer reticulated domes,
International Journal of Space Structures 7(4): 363368.
Yamada, S; Takeuchi, A.; Tada, Y.; Tsutsumi, K. 2001.
Imperfection-sensitive overall buckling of single-layer lattice domes,
Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE 127(4): 382-396.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399 (2001)127:4(382)
Zhang, A. L.; Zhang, X. F.; Ge, J. Q. 2006. Influence of initial
geometrical imperfections on stability of a suspendome for badminton
arena for 2008 Olympic Games, Spatial Structures 12(4): 8-12 (in
Chinese).
Jianguo Cai (1), Yixiang Xu (2), Jian Feng, Jin Zhang
(1,3,4) Key Laboratory of C&PC Structures of Ministry of
Educaiton, National Prestress Engineering Research Center, Southeast
University, Nanjing 210096, China
(2) Department of Civil Engineering, Strathclyde University,
Glasgow, United Kingdom E-mails: 1 j.cai@seu.edu.cn;
2yixiang.xu@strath.ac.uk;
(3) seucivilfj@hotmail.com (corresponding
author);4zhangjin@seu.edu.cn
Received 17 Nov. 2010; accepted 25 Nov. 2011
Jianguo CAI. Lecturer in School of Civil Engineering at Southeast
University, Nanjing, China. He is the author of about 40 papers,
published in both national and international conference proceedings and
journals. His research interests focus on Long-span Structures and
Deployable Structures.
Yixiang XU. Lecturer in the Departments of Civil Engineering at the
University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK. He is the author of a number of
papers, published in conference proceedings and journals. He is
interested in the area of numerical study of advanced space structures
as well as and design and analysis of infrastructural structures, e.g.
portal frame and web crippling.
Jian FENG. Currently working as a Professor in Key Laboratory of
Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structure of Ministry of Education,
Southeast University, Nanjing, China. He is the author of about 100
papers, published in both national and international conference
proceedings and journals. His research interests focus on Structural
Design, Prestressed Structures and Precast Structures.
Jin ZHANG. Currently working as an associate Professor in Key
Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structure of Ministry of
Education, Southeast University, Nanjing, China. His research interests
focus on Structural Design, Prestressed Structures and Timber
Structures.