The Economic Consequences of Professional Sports Strikes and Lockouts.
Humphreys, Brad R.
Dennis Coates [*]
Brad R. Humphreys [+]
The National Basketball Association (NBA) lockout of 1998-1999
resulted in the cancellation of a significant number of games. According
to the claims made by proponents of sports-driven economic growth,
cities with NBA franchises should experience significant negative
economic losses from this work stoppage because of the lost spending in
and around basketball arenas during this event. Although it will be
several years before adequate data exist for a careful ex post
evaluation of the effects of the lockout, an examination of the impact
of past work stoppages in professional football and basketball can shed
some light on the potential impact of the NBA lockout as well as the
viability of professional sports as engines of economic growth in
cities. The parameter estimates from a reduced-form empirical model of
the determination of real per capita income in 37 Standard Metropolitan
Statistical Areas (SMSAs) over the period 1969-1996 suggest that prior
work stoppages in professional football and baseball had no impact on
the economies of cities with franchises. Further, the departure of
professional basketball from cities had no impact on their economies in
the following years. These results refute the idea that attracting
professional sports franchises represents a viable economic development
strategy.
1. Introduction
The recent labor difficulties between the players and owners in the
National Basketball Association (NBA) resulted in the cancellation of a
significant number of games. Such work stoppages present economists with
a natural experiment on the effects of professional sports on local
economic development. If, as sports-led development advocates argue,
professional sports leverage greater economic activity, especially
consumer spending, then the work stoppage must have the opposite effect.
Local economies must take a hit because of the absence of play. This
paper examines the economic consequences of work stoppages in
professional sports leagues on the economies of cities with professional
sports franchises.
It will be a year or more before adequate data are available to
conduct a careful ex post study of the economic consequences of the NBA
lockout. However, the empirical analysis done by Coates and Humphreys
(1999) implies two indirect methods for analyzing the effects of work
stoppages in professional sports leagues on local economies.
The first method assesses the effects of work stoppages in both
professional football and baseball to infer the likely impact of the NBA
lockout. The NBA lockout during the 1998-1999 season lasted over 200
days and resulted in 424 games being lost, with 725 being played. As
work stoppages in professional sports go, it was typical. For example,
Major League Baseball had three significant work stoppages during the
period 1969-1996. The least severe baseball strike occurred in 1972,
when 85 games were cancelled and 1,859 games were played. The 1981
strike led to the cancellation of 712 games; 1,394 games were played.
The 1994 strike resulted in the cancellation of 669 games as well as the
postseason; 1,599 games were played. Although the latter two strikes ate
larger than the first, all three represent a considerable number of lost
games. The National Football League (NFL) had two work stoppages during
this period, in 1982 and 1987. The 1982 strike lasted 57 days and
reduced the number of games played from 16 t o 9 per team. The 1987
strike lasted 24 days. The games scheduled for the third week of the
season were cancelled, and the games in weeks 4 through 6 were played by
replacement players.
None of these work stoppages led to the loss of an entire season.
If one treats the 1987 NFL games played with replacement players as
cancelled games, then, with the exception of the 1972 baseball strike,
the work stoppages in baseball and football are roughly the same
duration and about the same magnitude as the NBA lockout. Consequently,
if the work stoppages in baseball and football had a measurable effect
on local economies, then one might expect that the NBA lockout would
affect the economy in cities where these teams play. However,
professional basketball may differ from pro football and major league
baseball in some fundamental way that would alter its overall impact on
a Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area's (SMSA) economy. For
example, basketball fans may be drawn more from within the SMSA than
football or baseball fans. If this is the case, the effects of football
or baseball strikes may be poor guides to the effects of a basketball
lockout.
The second method exploits NBA franchise moves over the last 30
years. If the local economy were affected by the departure of an NBA
franchise in the past, then one might expect that the current work
stoppage would affect the local economy in a similar way.
Although strikes have received considerable attention from
economists, relatively little is known about the economic impact of
professional sports strikes. Zipp (1996) examined the effect of the 1994
baseball strike on a sample of 17 SMSAs; Zipp (1997) extended this
analysis to include counties in Florida that host spring training games
during the spring 1995 portion of this strike. In both cases, no
significant impact of this strike on local economies was found. To our
knowledge, no investigations of the impact of strikes or lockouts in
other professional sports (or other baseball strikes) have been done.
The existing evidence on the effect of professional sports on the
local economy can be divided into two distinct groups. One group
includes economic impact studies commissioned by teams or other
interested parties. These ex ante exercises typically conclude that
attracting a new professional sports team or building a new stadium for
an existing team will yield large positive gains for a city's
economy. [1] These economic benefits flow directly from the construction
and use of facilities and indirectly from "multiplier" effects
as the increase in employment and spending generated from building and
using the facility circulate throughout the local economy.
The other group includes ex post studies carried out in academic
settings. These may be formal cost-benefit studies of individual cities
and their franchises or stadiums, like Hamilton and Kahn (1997) or
Rosentraub and Swindell (1991). Alternatively, these studies may use
econometric techniques to estimate the effects of the sports environment
on the economic vitality of a city using time-series data on a single
city, using cross-sectional data on a sample of cities, or using
time-series cross-sectional data on a panel of cities over time. Among
these empirical studies are Baade and Dye (1990), Baade (1996), and
Coates and Humphreys (1999). Rosentraub (1997) provides a thorough
examination of these issues as well as a synthesis of the existing
literature. The general conclusion of these studies is that stadiums and
professional sport franchises have little or no positive effects on the
local economy, although they may reduce real per capita income in some
cases.
2. Empirical Analysis
We adopt the framework developed by Coates and Humphreys (1999) to
analyze the effects of the professional sports environment on the
economy in an SMSA containing now or at some time in the last 30 years a
franchise in one or more of professional football, basketball, or
baseball. This framework employs a linear reduced-form empirical model
that relates the level of real per capita personal income in a
metropolitan area in a given year, [y.sub.it] to a vector of variables
describing the economic and business climate in that area during that
year, [x.sub.it], and to a vector of variables that capture the role of
stadiums and franchises in the determination of economic activity,
[z.sub.it]. This linear reduced-form empirical model is
[y.sub.it] = [beta][x.sub.it] + [gamma][z.sub.it] +
[[micro].sub.it] (1)
where [beta] and [gamma] are vectors of parameters to be estimated
and [[micro].sub.it] is a disturbance term. By assumption, the
disturbance term takes the form
[[micro].sub.it] = [e.sub.it] + [v.sub.i] + [u.sub.t], (2)
where [v.sub.i] is a disturbance specific to SMSA i that persists
throughout the sample period, [u.sub.t], is a time t specific
disturbance that affects all areas in the same way, and [e.sub.it] is a
random shock in SMSA i at time t that is uncorrelated across SMSAs and
over time. Estimated this way, the regression purges the effect of
national events on each jurisdiction in a given year and generates an
SMSA-specific impact. In other words, the level of income per capita at
any point in time is determined by time- and location-specific events
and the circumstances regarding sports franchises and stadiums.
In Equation 1, [x.sub.it] is a vector of variables that control for
factors other than the professional sports environment that affect real
per capita income in SMSAs. We employ four control variables in this
study: the lagged level of real per capita income ([y.sub.i,t-1]), the
growth rate of the population in each SMSA expressed in percentage
terms, year dummy variables that capture other omitted factors that
affect all SMSAs in the sample in each year, and SMSA-specific time
trends that capture secular trends in individual SMSAs. [2]
The vector of sports environment variables, [Z.sub.it], contains a
variety of dummy variables to capture some of the variation in the
sports environment in each of the 37 SMSAs that currently have or at
some time in the past 30 years had a professional football, basketball,
or baseball franchise. This vector includes dummy variables indicating
the presence of a football, basketball, or baseball franchise; dummy
variables indicating the 10-year periods following all football,
basketball, and baseball franchise entries and exits; variables
indicating the 10-year period following construction or renovation of a
stadium or arena; and variables indicating whether the stadium in each
SMSA is a single- or a multiple-use structure. The term [Z.sub.it], also
includes the seating capacity of all football, basketball, and baseball
stadiums and those capacities squared. These capacity variables are
intended to capture the idiosyncratic nature of each individual
professional sports venue and to reflect the incremental effects of
renovation.
The entry, exit, and construction variables take on a value of one
in 10 successive years: the year a franchise moves, or the year a
stadium or arena opens, and the nine subsequent years, in order to
capture the length of time it takes for the novelty of a new franchise
or stadium to wear off, as has been suggested by Baade (1996), or for
the despair from losing a team to subside. Baade and Sanderson (1997)
estimate the novelty effect for 10 cities. They find effects in the
range of from 7 to 10 years. The entry and departure variables are BBE,
FRE, RAE, BBD, FBD, and BAD for baseball, football, and basketball entry
and baseball, football, and basketball departure, respectively.
Construction variables are BACO, FBCO, BBFBC, and BBCO for
basketball-only, football-only, joint football and baseball, or
baseball-only construction.
In order to determine the effect of the work stoppages in
professional sports on local economies, two dummy variables were
created, one each for baseball and football strikes. Each takes the
value one in each year of a pro football or baseball work stoppage for
cities that have franchises in those sports.
One might question the choice of SMSAs as the unit of measure in
this analysis. A considerable amount of research conducted in the 1950s
and 1960s found no impact of strikes on the national economy; perhaps
SMSAs are large enough relative to the size of a professional sports
team to obscure the effects of a strike. Neumann and Reder (1984) found
evidence that strikes against some firms in an industry affected output
of that industry in about a quarter of the 63 three-digit standard
industrial classification (SIC) code industries they studied. The
three-digit SIC code industries examined by Neumann and Reder (1984) are
of comparable size to the SMSAS in our sample, which suggests that our
geographic unit of measurement may not be too large for the question at
hand. [3] We have more to say about this issue shortly.
Table 1 provides descriptive statistics and variable definitions
for the data used in this study. The data are annual and cover the
period 1969-1996. Income and population data come from the Regional
Economic Information System (REIS) CD-ROM, distributed by the U.S.
Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. Data on sports
franchises, stadiums, and strikes come from Quirk and Fort (1992), and
the Information Please Sports Almanac (Houghton Mifflin Company 1996),
and Noll and Zimbalist (1997a, b). The data set differs from that in
Coates and Humphreys (1999) in two ways. First, two additional years of
data are included. These additional years are beneficial because several
new stadiums and new franchises came into existence in the early to
mid-1990s. [4] The effects of these will now be more accurately captured
because of the additional years of data. Second, data on franchise
entries and exits were recoded, particularly for the early years of the
data, to conform with histories reported in Quirk an d Fort (1992).
Random- and fixed-effects estimations of Equation 1 without the
baseball and football strike variables included as regressors are shown
in Table 2. The first point to note is that the random-effects results
are consistent with those reported in Coates and Humphreys (1999). The
sports environment variables as a group are clearly important variables.
For the random-effects model, the F-statistic under the null hypothesis is 1.77; the 5% critical value with 19 and 905 degrees of freedom is
about 1.62. [5] For the fixed-effects model, the F-statistic is 1.66
with 19 and 868 degrees of freedom. The critical value is, again, about
1.62. Consequently, in either the random- or fixed-effects model, the
null hypothesis of no effect of the sports environment may be rejected.
Few of these variables are individually significant, however, and
which ones are significant depends on random versus fixed effects. Of
those that are individually significant in the random-effects
specification, baseball stadium capacity and that capacity squared are
so at the 5% level. Football stadium construction and basketball entry
are also significant, but at the 10% level. In the fixed-effects
estimation, only entry of a basketball team and entry of a football team
are individually significant.
The economic control variables are correctly signed and
statistically significant in almost all model specifications. The
parameter estimated for lagged per capita income and the growth rate of
the population are shown in Table 2. Although not reported, all but one
of the parameters on the SMSA-specific time trends are statistically
significant, as are most of the parameters on the year dummies. Coupled
with the significance of lagged real per capita income and the growth
rate of the population, these results suggest that a considerable amount
of non-sports-related factors that affect real per capita income have
been accounted for.
Table 3 adds professional sports strike variables to the empirical
model. These results use a fixed-effects estimator; a Hausman test rejected a random-effects specification in favor of fixed effects for
this model. Introducing the strike variables has virtually no effect on
any of the other coefficient estimates. Interestingly, both strike
variables have positive coefficients, the opposite of what one would
expect based on the theory of sports-led development. Neither, however,
is individually statistically significant. Additionally, an F-test on
the null hypothesis that both coefficients are zero has a value of 0.956
in the random-effects model and a value of 0.908 in the fixed-effects
model, clearly indicating that the null not be rejected. It does not
appear that past work stoppages in professional baseball or football had
a measurable impact on real per capita personal income in cities with
these franchises.
Although imprecisely estimated, the parameters on the strike
variables suggest that real per capita income rises in SMSAs during
years that the professional sports teams in these SMSAs are on strike.
The increase in real per capita income associated with these strike
years represents a small fraction of per capita income in the SMSAs in
the sample: 0.38% of the average level of income in our sample in the
case of baseball strikes and 0.17% in the case of football strikes.
Still, this differs from the claims made by proponents of professional
sports as engines of economic development; if professional sports make
important contributions to the economy, then in their absence incomes
should fall, not rise.
Several possible explanations exist for our results. One is
substitution in private spending. Attending a professional sporting
event is one of many entertainment options in metropolitan areas. Fans
could alternatively go out to dinner and a movie or go bowling during a
sports strike. If these alternative activities have higher local
spending multipliers than does spending on professional sports, then
income could be higher during strikes.
Differences in the impact of public and private spending represents
a second explanation. Professional sporting events increase metropolitan
government spending by driving up spending on public safety, crowd and
traffic control, and so on. If this category of public spending declines
during a strike and the metropolitan government either borrows less or
collects fewer taxes or fees as a result of this decrease in spending,
then additional money will remain in the pockets of private citizens.
Furthermore, if the marginal impact of these additional private dollars
exceeds the marginal impact of these dollars in public hands, then total
income in the metropolitan area would increase. There would also be a
decrease in deadweight loss in this case.
Finally, our results may reflect the effects of professional sports
on the productivity of workers. If workers spend time discussing the
outcome of last night's game rather than devoting this time to
job-related activities, then these workers will be less productive in
terms of output produced per unit of time. Less output will be produced
and less income generated. Fewer such opportunities exist during sports
strikes. Therefore, other things equal, during these strikes one would
observe higher productivity, production, and income.
One might argue that the lack of statistical significance of the
strike variables arises because the severity of the strikes varies
dramatically. For example, during the smallest baseball strike, the
ratio of games canceled to games played is 0.046. During the most severe
baseball strike (1981), the ratio is 0.511. That is, fully a third of
the scheduled games were lost that year. For football, the worst strike
reduced the season from 16 to 9 games, a ratio of games lost to games
played of 0.778. The 1987 NFL season lost only one week of games, though
games for three additional weeks were played by replacement players.
To check for differential effects by severity of the work stoppage,
separate dummy variables for each strike were created. These variables
take a value of one for a city with a franchise in the sport suffering
from the work stoppage in a particular year and a value of zero for all
other years and all cities without a franchise in that sport. For the
fixed-effects model reported in Table 3, the effects of these strike
variables are mixed. The t-statistic is greater than one in absolute
value for both the baseball strike of 1994 and the football strike of
1982. Neither variable is close to individually significant, however.
Additionally, only the baseball strike of 1994 and the football strike
of 1987 have the correct sign, indicating that the strike reduced
economic vitality in cities with franchises. The F-statistic under the
null of no significance of these strike variables is 0.878. The null
cannot be rejected.
Including these strike variables can be viewed as a relatively
strong test of the direct effect of professional sports on local
economies. The evidence from these tests is clearly opposed to the
notion that professional sports has any significant effect on the local
economies. It also suggests that one should expect little or no
repercussions on the local economies of cities with professional
basketball franchises despite the duration of the NBA lockout of
l998-1999. [6]
Recall that Neumann and Reder (1984) found effects of strikes
against some firms in an industry in only about 25% of the industries
they studied. They hypothesize that the strikes against a few firms have
little impact on the industry as the unstruck firms expand production to
fill the excess demand. In other words, the products of different firms
in the industry are close substitutes for one another. Advocates of
sports-led development might argue that the effects of strikes in
professional sports have important effects on local income but that
those effects are hidden by substitution into other recreation
activities during the strike. But then the failure of these advocates to
adequately consider substitution effects in their economic impact
studies is laid bare. It is only by ignoring the substitution effects
that large effects of stadiums, arenas, and franchises and of strikes
can be consistent with the findings of this paper.
An alternative approach to assessing the importance of the lockout
is to examine the effects of a professional basketball team leaving a
city. In the results reported here, the basketball team departure
variable is one for each of 10 years after a team leaves a city. The
coefficient estimate is generally negative, consistent with the
sports-led development hypothesis that professional sports is or can be
an engine of economic growth. However, the departure variable is never
individually statistically significant, though the t-statistic is
generally slightly greater than one in absolute value.
The lockout is not, however, a permanent departure from the city.
It seems a stretch to think that its effect will carry through 10 years.
For this reason, an additional test of the departure of a basketball
team examines the effect in the year after the team leaves. There are
nine instances of NBA franchises departing one city for another in the
period 1969-1996. As an alternative to the previous models, additional
models are estimated using a dummy variable that is equal to one in only
the year following the departure of a basketball franchise. This
variable is not statistically significant in either the random- or the
fixed-effects model. In addition, it has a positive sign, suggesting
that in the year after a basketball team leaves a city, real personal
income per capita rises.
This positive sign is, of course, at odds with the theory of sports
as a catalyst for economic development. Explanations for positive signs
on the franchise departure variables include those mentioned previously
in the discussion of positive coefficients on the strike variables.
Because the departure of a franchise is a permanent event while strikes
are temporary, the long-run effects of professional sports on
metropolitan economies discussed by Coates and Eumphreys (1999), like
compensating earnings differentials and substitution in public spending,
also apply in this case.
3. Conclusion
In this paper we proceed from the assumption that professional
sports can effectively enhance local economic development. Under this
assumption, work stoppages in professional sports should have harmful
effects on the economies of the regions that are home to franchises. If
this is true, then the lockout in the NBA at the beginning of the
1998-1999 season will have negatively affected the economies of many
major metropolitan areas in the United States.
Fortunately, the evidence does not support the assertion that
professional sports influence the economic health of SMSAs. Previous
research has found little economic benefit and in some cases harmful
effects of the sports environment on cities' economies. The results
of this paper are consistent with those conclusions. Work stoppages in
baseball and football have never had significant impacts on local
economies. The departure of a franchise in any sport, particularly in
basketball, has never significantly lowered real per capita personal
income in a metropolitan area. This is good news for SMSAs with NBA
teams. The recent lockout will likely have had no effect, and possibly
even a beneficial effect, on their economies.
(*.)Department of Economics, University of Maryland Baltimore
County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA; E-mail
coates@umbc.edu; corresponding author.
(+.)Department of Economics, University of Maryland Baltimore
County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA.
We thank Andrew Zimbalist, an anonymous referee, and seminar
participants at the Congressional Budget Office for their helpful
comments and Ryan Mutter for research assistance.
Received October 1999; accepted March 2000.
(1.) See Crompton (1995) for a review of this literature and Noll
and Zimbalist (1997) for a detailed discussion of the problems inherent
to this approach.
(2.) The inclusion of a lagged dependent variable makes this model
a dynamic panel model. Although lagged dependent variables cause bias in
the parameter estimates, Monte Carlo evidence in Judson and Owen (1997)
suggests that the bias affects the parameter on the lagged dependent
variable, not the parameters on the independent variables. Kiviet (1995)
reports similar results from panels with time dimensions 20% of the
sample in this study.
(3.) Consider the first four three-digit SIC code industries in the
Food industry in the Neumann and Reder sample: Meat Products (SIC 201),
Dairy Products (SIC 202), Fats and Oils (SIC 207), and Miscellaneous
Food Products (SIC 209). In 1982, the midpoint of our sample, the annual
value of shipments in the Meat Products industry was larger than the
annual personal income in all but four of the SMSAs in our sample;
annual shipments in the Dairy Products industry were larger than the
annual personal income in all but eight of the SMSAs in our sample;
annual shipments in Miscellaneous Food Products was close to the median
personal income from our sample; and for Fats and Oils, the smallest of
these four three-digit industries, eight SMSAs had personal income
smaller than the annual value of shipments in this industry.
(4.) Newly opened stadiums include Camden Yards in Baltimore,
Jacobs Field in Cleveland, The Ball Park in Arlington, and Coors Field in Denver. New franchises include the Colorado Rockies and Florida
Marlins.
(5.) The value 1.62 corresponds to an F-distributed random variable
with 20 and 200 degrees of freedom.
(6.) But the caveat regarding differences between professional
sports mentioned previously still applies.
References
Baade, Robert A. 1996. Professional sports as catalysts for
metropolitan economic development. Journal of Urban Affairs 18:1-17.
Baade, Robert A., and Richard F. Dye. 1990. Stadiums and
professional sports on metropolitan area development. Growth and Change
12:1-14.
Baade, Robert A., and Allen R. Sanderson. 1997. The employment
effect of teams and sports facilities. In Sports, jobs and taxes: The
economic impact of sports teams and stadiums, edited by Roger G. Noll
and Andrew Zimbalist. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press,
pp. 92-118.
Coates, Dennis, and Brad R. Humphreys. 1999. The growth effects of
sports franchises, stadia and arenas. Journal of Policy Analysis and
Management 18:601-24.
Crompton, John L. 1995. Analysis of sports facilities and events:
Eleven sources of misapplication. Journal of Sport Management 9:14-35.
Hamilton, Bruce, and Peter Kahn. 1997. Baltimore's Camden
Yards ballparks. In Sports, jobs and taxes: The economic impact of
sports teams and stadiums, edited by Roger G. Noll and Andrew Zimbalist.
Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press, pp. 245-81.
Houghton Mifflin Company. 1996. Information Please Sports Almanac.
Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Judson, Ruth A., and Ann L. Owen. 1997. Estimating dynamic panel
data models: A practical guide for macroeconomists. Unpublished paper,
Federal Reserve Board of Governors.
Kiviet, Jan F. 1995. On bias, inconsistency, and efficiency of
various estimators in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 68:53-78.
Neumann, George R., and Melvin W. Reder. 1984. Output and strike
activity in U.S. manufacturing: How large are the losses? Industrial and
Labor Relations Review 37:197-211.
Noll, Roger G., and Andrew Zimbalist. 1997a. Build the stadium,
create the jobs! In Sports, jobs and taxes: The economic impact of
sports teams and stadiums, edited by Roger G. Noll and Andrew Zimbalist,
Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press, pp. 1-54.
Noll, Roger G., and Andrew Zimbalist. 1997b. Sports. jobs and
taxes: The economic impact of sports teams and stadiums. Washington, DC:
The Brookings Institution Press.
Quirk, James P., and Rodney D. Fort. 1992. Pay dirt: The business
of professional team sports. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rosentraub, Mark S. 1997. Major league losers: The real cost of
sports and who's paying for it. New York: Basic Books.
Rosentraub, Mark S., and David Swindell. 1991. The economic and
political realities of a small city's investment in minor league
baseball: just say no? Economic Development Quarterly 5:152-67.
Zipp, John F. 1996. The economic impact of the baseball strike of
1994. Urban Affairs Review 32:157-85.
Zipp, John F. 1997. Spring training. In Sports, jobs and taxes: The
economic impact of sports teams and stadiums, edited by Roger G. Noll
and Andrew Zimbalist. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press,
pp. 427-51.
Variable Definitions, Means, and Standard Deviations
Standard
Variable Mean Deviation Definition
RPCPI 14,062.0 2377.1 Real per capita income
DPOP 0.013 0.014 Growth rate of population (%)
BBCAP 36.536 31.272 Baseball stadium capacity, thousands
FBCAP 48.098 35.077 Football stadium capacity, thousands
BACAP 10.473 9.966 Basketball stadium capacity, thousands
BBCO 0.033 0.179 Baseball stadium constructed, last 10 years
FBCO 0.096 0.295 Football stadium constructed, last 10 years
BBFBC 0.102 0.303 Baseball/football stadium constructed,
last 10 years
BACO 0.225 0.418 Basketball arena constructed, last 10 years
BBF 0.615 0.487 Baseball franchise present
FBF 0.705 0.456 Football franchise present
BAF 0.598 0.491 Basketball franchise present
BBE 0.079 0.270 Any baseball franchise entered, last 10 years
BAE 0.231 0.422 Any basketball franchise entered, last 10 years
FBE 0.101 0.302 Any football franchise entered, last 10 years
BBD 0.028 0.165 Any baseball franchise left, last 10 years
BAD 0.103 0.304 Any basketball franchise left, last 10 years
FBD 0.056 0.230 Any football franchise left, last 10 years
BADS 0.008 0.0892 Year following basketball team departure
BBST 0.093 0.291 Baseball franchise during a baseball strike
FBST 0.052 0.222 Football franchise during a football strike
BB72 0.022 0.147 Baseball franchise during 1972 baseball strike
BB81 0.023 0.150 Baseball franchise during 1981 baseball strike
BB94 0.024 0.153 Baseball franchise during 1994 baseball strike
FB82 0.026 0.159 Football franchise during 1982 football strike
FB87 0.026 0.159 Football franchise during 1987 football strike
Base Model--Dependent Variable:
Real Per Capita Personal Income
Random Effects Fixed Effects
Variable Coefficient t-Statistic Coefficient t-Statistic
Constant 919.8 6.63
[RPCPL.sub.-1] 0.92 73.22 0.77 34.96
DPOP 1352.50 1.68 3691.60 3.39
BBCAP 15.38 2.41 9.75 0.65
FBCAP -4.41 -0.74 -10.43 -1.46
BACAP 1.37 0.12 0.47 0.04
BBCAP2 -0.10 -2.39 -0.99 -0.81
FBCAP2 0.02 0.61 0.05 1.23
BACAP2 -0.01 -0.05 -0.002 -.01
BACO -34.69 -1.21 -33.85 -1.02
FBCO 59.42 1.88 51.67 1.34
BBFBC -44.78 -1.34 22.68 0.51
BBCO -2.58 -0.05 -92.02 -1.59
BAFR -67.05 -0.57 -35.19 -0.25
FBFR 157.98 0.67 310.40 1.04
BBFR -332.30 -1.46 -6.18 -0.01
BBE 25.59 0.67 -8.12 -0.17
BAE 57.01 1.86 75.62 2.21
FRE 21.87 0.64 91.42 2.07
BBD 51.47 0.98 -91.36 -1.23
BAD -33.96 -1.09 1.32 0.04
FBD 52.14 1.08 -7.93 -0.14
[R.sup.2] .992 .993
N 999 999
Strike Effects--Dependent Variable: RealPer Capita Personal Income
Strike Effects Constant Strike Effects Vary by
by Sport Sport and Year
Variable Coefficient t-Statistic Coefficient
[RPCPI.sub.-1] 0.769 34.98 0.776
DPOP 3800.38 3.48 3771.17
BBCAP 10.70 0.71 9.19
FBCAP -10.65 -1.49 -10.75
BACAP 1.04 0.08 1.35
[BBCAP.sup.2] -0.11 -0.71 -0.09
[FBCAP.sup.2] 0.05 1.26 0.53
[BACAP.sup.2] -0.01 -0.05 -0.02
BAFR -44.03 -0.32 -45.95
FBFR 316.53 1.06 314.47
BBFR -36.01 -0.07 7.55
BBCO -98.35 -1.69 -88.01
FBCO 49.36 52.12
BACO -35.39 1.27 -37.60
BBE -12.01 -1.06 -9.12
FBE 90.45 -0.25 94.84
BAE 76.06 2.04 77.78
BBD -89.28 2.22 -86.60
FBD -5.58 -1.20 -14.59
BAD -0.02 -0.09 1.99
BBST 53.96 -0.003 --
FBST 23.48 1.31 --
BB72 -- 0.40 70.21
BB81 -- -- 66.93
BB94 -- -- -80.93
FB82 -- -- 96.11
FB87 -- -- -55.15
[R.sup.2] --
Variable t-Statistic
[RPCPI.sub.-1] 34.81
DPOP 3.45
BBCAP 0.61
FBCAP -1.51
BACAP 0.10
[BBCAP.sup.2] -0.77
[FBCAP.sup.2] 1.27
[BACAP.sup.2] -0.09
BAFR -0.32
FBFR 1.05
BBFR 0.05
BBCO -1.52
FBCO 1.34
BACO -1.12
BBE -0.19
FBE 2.13
BAE 2.26
BBD -1.16
FBD -0.24
BAD 0.05
BBST --
FBST --
BB72 0.90
BB81 0.88
BB94 -1.02
FB82 1.20
FB87 -0.68
[R.sup.2] 0.992
SMSA=specific effects included but not reported.