Diamonds Are Forever: The Business of Baseball.
Singell, Larry D., Jr.
The business of baseball changed dramatically in the last two
decades: Diamonds are Forever: The Business of Baseball is a collection
of scholarly work on the impact of these changes on the game. A
combination of theoretical, descriptive, and empirical studies examine
four broad issues: (1) the labor market for baseball players; (2) the
impact of fans; (3) pay, performance, and competitive balance and; (4)
the impact of race on salary. In these areas, the book is largely
successful in its stated objective of updating economic analyses of
professional sports provided in the volume Government and the Sports
Business, edited by Roger G. Noll |1~.
The three papers in Part I examine how operating procedures in
major-league baseball can affect the labor market for players. The first
paper by George G. Daly describes the potential effects of contracting
structure on competitive balance and contest legitimacy. In particular,
Rottenberg |2~ proposes that resource allocation is invariant to
ownership rights to player services; Daly examines circumstances when
this application of the Coase theorem might break down. He argues that
prior contractual agreements limiting players' negotiating options
with professional sports leagues (e.g., the reserve clause) may be
economically efficient because it protects, and thereby encourages,
transaction-specific investments. These investments have real effects
that can include a larger level of league output, higher-quality
athletic performances, enhancement of league legitimacy and competitive
balance. A second paper, by Frederick et al., distinguishes empirically
between three competing hypotheses of arbitrator behavior in final-offer
arbitration. They find that behavior differs for second-time versus
first-time participants in salary arbitration; specifically, repeated
arbitration narrows the spread between salaries proposed by a player and
his team, suggesting that final-offer arbitration converges to the
player's "true" market value. The final paper in this
chapter by Paul L. Burgess and Daniel R. Marburger estimates the
"bargaining-power effect" of arbitration eligibility. By
comparing the salaries of arbitration-eligible players with those who
are not, they find that hitters, starting pitchers, and relief pitchers obtain, respectively, an 86, 89, and 58 percent salary increase
subsequent to eligibility. They conclude that final-offer arbitration
serves to encourage negotiations between players and clubs, which
reduces the apparent monopsony power of team owners.
Part II contains three papers that examine the role of the fan in
determining the team winning percentage, ticket sales, and value of
baseball cards. Philip K. Porter develops a theoretical model and
provides empirical support for the contention that "fan
fickleness" directs players to markets where the demand for high
quality is greatest. A team is thus rewarded for acquiring players that
fans want to see most, and its viability depends, not only on the number
of fans, but their demand for quality. A paper by David J. Salant models
season ticket holders as having an implicit contract that provides the
option to purchase tickets for high demand games (e.g., playoff tickets)
at below-market prices in exchange for their initial precommitment to
purchase season tickets. Thus, if teams charge high ticket prices in
good times it violates their implicit contract and lowers the value of
season tickets in the future. Thus, offering below-market prices for
playoff tickets to season ticket holders is a method of increasing
ticket sales in bad years and smoothing gate receipts over time.
Finally, John A. Vernon provides a case study of the picture-card
industry in its infancy. The paper details the restraint-of-trade action
filed before the Federal Trade Commission by one bubble-gum card
manufacturer against another.
Part III includes two papers that examine the relationship between a
player's pay and performance. A paper by Andrew Zimbalist expands
upon an empirical technique proposed by Scully |3~ to determine player
contributions to team earnings by using more robust measures of player
performance. The paper also presents an alternative method of
calculating a player's marginal revenue product; estimates support
prior evidence of monopsony power of the league and the author offers
some normative assessments of its impact on the game. Rodney Fort uses
salary data over twenty-five years to test the relative importance of
various salary determinants during the "reserve-clause" versus
"free-agency" period. The determinants of salary, while
changing somewhat over the period, collectively explain a greater
percentage of the variation in salary over time; it is hypothesized that
this is due both to the redistribution of income towards players and the
increase in the demand for the output of major-league baseball. However,
salary inequality between players also appears to increase over time,
especially in recent years when free agency and a union are introduced.
This phenomenon is not explained.
The final section is comprised of two papers that address whether
racial discrimination is present in major-league baseball. A survey by
Lawrence M. Kahn, while finding little evidence of salary or hiring
discrimination, indicates some unexplained racial differences in career
length and persistent, but declining, segregation by position. Bruce K.
Johnson finds, however, that a player's salary may depend on the
racial composition of his team. Specifically, white players who play on
a relatively black teams earn more than those who play on teams that
have a racial mix that includes more white players. This finding is
consistent with employee discrimination models that predict whites
require a premium to work with blacks; however, this result could also
arise if fans prefer, on average, to watch white players.
Overall, the book offers an interesting look at how recent changes in
baseball affect the game both on and off the field, and is likely to be
enjoyable reading material for most baseball aficionados. A possible
shortcoming of the book is that it deemphasizes the implications of its
findings for industries beyond professional sports that are of broader
scholarly interest. Nonetheless, a majority of the analyses make clever
use of the unique institutional setting provided by major-league
baseball and its detailed data to test hypotheses that could not be
otherwise examined using more traditional industries. Larry D. Singell,
Jr. University of Oregon
References
1. Noll, Roger G., ed. Government and the Sports Business. Brookings,
1974.
2. Rottenberg, Simon, "The Baseball Players' Labor
Market." Journal of Political Economy, 64, 242-58.
3. Scully, Gerald W., "Pay and Performance in Major League
Baseball." American Economic Review, 64, 1974, 915-30.