Macroeconomic development and economic policy 2014-2018.
Sweden's GDP will grow modestly in the first quarter of 2014
after recovery began at the end of 2013. Not until the beginning of
2017, however, will the economy return to full capacity. The protracted recovery in the OECD area means that domestic demand will be more
important than usual for Swedish growth. As cyclically-adjusted net
lending in 2014 will be considerably lower than the surplus target would
permit in the longer term, fiscal policy will need to be tightened in
subsequent years. Given the extensive need for tightening, the NIER believes that general government net lending will not meet the surplus
target until 2018, the year after the economy reaches full capacity. Low
resource utilisation, low inflation and low interest rates abroad
suggest that the Riksbank will leave the repo rate unchanged until the
third quarter of 2015.
This chapter begins with an overview of the NIER's forecast
for the global and Swedish economies in 2014-2018 before looking in
greater depth at the forecast for monetary and fiscal policy. A more
detailed presentation of economic developments in 2014-2015 can be found
in the subsequent chapters of the report. Public finances and fiscal
policy are covered in more detail in the chapter "Public
Finances".
International Developments
CONTINUED RECOVERY IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY
Leading indicators suggest that the global economy will continue
its recovery, but the global picture is mixed. Growth is much higher in
the US, the UK and Japan than in southern Europe. GDP growth in emerging
markets is weaker than normal (see Diagram 14), but they have fewer idle
resources than in the OECD. When the Federal Reserve began to taper its
quantitative easing, some emerging markets were also hit by outflows of
capital, leading to falling share prices and weaker currencies.
[GRAPHIC 14 OMITTED]
SLOW RECOVERY IN THE OECD
The adjustment of competitiveness between countries in the euro
area is continuing. Relative cost levels have improved in several
countries with structural current account deficits, but further
structural reforms will probably be required in some countries to
correct both internal and external imbalances. It is also important that
decisions are made on a credible framework for the management of bank
crises, and that the stress-testing of the European banking sector by
the European Central Bank (ECB) does not uncover any previously unknown
problems. Household saving is expected to remain high, and the public
sector will continue its fiscal tightening. As debt returns to more
stable levels, lending rates are expected to fall for households and
firms, and demand for credit will increase as the economy recovers. This
will gradually enhance the effect of the region's expansionary
monetary policy, which will contribute to the recovery. However, the
recovery will only marginally reduce unemployment, which will remain
high in the coming years. High unemployment and weak resource
utilisation mean very low price pressure in the euro area as a whole
(see Diagram 15). Prices in the euro area as a whole will also be held
back by low inflation in Germany, because greater competitiveness for
euro countries with structural current account deficits depends on
prices rising less than in Germany.
[GRAPHIC 15 OMITTED]
[GRAPHIC 16 OMITTED]
[GRAPHIC 17 OMITTED]
In the US, the recovery has slowed recently, due mainly to
weather-related disruptions. This slowdown will not persist, however,
and the recovery is expected to accelerate again before long. US
households are being favoured by rising asset prices, and the debt
adjustment process is considered largely complete. Combined with
unemployment continuing to fall, this has prompted greater confidence
among both consumers and firms, which is stimulating consumption,
investment and, thereby, growth. The level of idle resources is still
considered to be high, however, which means that monetary policy will
remain highly expansionary, contributing, in turn, to resource
utilisation gradually increasing and normalising in 2018.
In Japan, expansionary monetary policy has contributed to
substantial depreciation of the yen. This has stimulated exports and
contributed to increased investment and lower unemployment. The
expansionary monetary policy has also pushed up both households'
and firms' inflation expectations. Higher inflation expectations,
high resource utilisation and the increases in consumption tax in 2014
and 2015 are expected to turn deflation into inflation of around 2 per
cent.
GDP in the OECD countries is expected to grow by an average of 2.4
per cent per year in 2014-2018 (see Table 3), but resource utilisation
is low and will not normalise until the end of 2018 (see Diagram 16).
This low resource utilisation will put a damper on inflation, which
means that the expansionary bias of monetary policy is not expected to
threaten these countries' inflation targets. This means, in turn,
that the recovery may continue to be bolstered by low central bank
policy rates in the coming years (see Diagram 17).
EMERGING MARKETS HAVE LOST MOMENTUM
Activity in emerging markets grew more slowly in 2013 than in 2012,
due partly to lower trend growth and partly to financial turbulence as a
result of the Federal Reserve's tapering of asset purchases, which
has led to falling share prices, weaker currencies and tighter monetary
policy in countries with large current account deficits. In Brazil, low
productivity growth, low investment and poorly functioning
infrastructure have led to a drop in trend growth. In China, growth is
expected to be much slower in the coming years than the average of just
over 10 per cent in 2000-2012. This is due to measures to promote
transition to a growth model based on a higher share of private
consumption and a lower share of investment. GDP in emerging markets is
nevertheless expected to grow by an average of 5.6 per cent per year in
2014-2018 (see Table 3), which is much higher than in the OECD
countries.
Developments in Sweden
PROLONGED SLUMP
The weak global economic climate in the wake of the financial and
debt crises has meant that the Swedish economy remains in the doldrums more than five years after the financial crisis erupted. High export
dependence has resulted in the Swedish economy being hit hard by
dwindling external demand. The nature of the crises has also fuelled
uncertainty about future economic developments, causing households and
firms to postpone consumption and investment. Despite expansionary
economic policy, resource utilisation in Sweden is much lower than
normal. Based on the NIER's calculations, GDP in 2013 was around 2
per cent below potential GDP, or the level of production associated with
normal utilisation of labour and capital (see Diagram 18).
WEAK PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH HAS HAMPERED GROWTH IN SWEDEN
The NIER believes that recent years' demographic developments
and economic policy--especially the earned-income tax credits--have
helped increase the structural supply of labour and thereby potential
hours worked. Meanwhile, productivity growth in the business sector has
been weak (see Diagram 19), which is believed to be a reflection to some
extent of lower growth in potential productivity. This can be explained
partly by low resource utilisation leading to lower investment growth
for a prolonged period, with negative effects on capital formation. Weak
productivity growth in many other countries suggests that the
development and introduction of new technology have slowed. All in all,
potential GDP is estimated to have grown by an average of 1.9 per cent
per year in 2007-2013, which is almost half a percentage point lower
than the average rate of growth in GDP in 1980-2006.
[GRAPHIC 18 OMITTED]
[GRAPHIC 19 OMITTED]
The recovery in the Swedish economy in 2014-2018 means that
investment in fixed assets will pick up relatively quickly. The capital
stock will therefore grow more quickly, promoting a gradual increase in
potential productivity growth (see Table 4). Potential hours worked will
continue to rise, and altogether this translates into stronger growth in
potential GDP in the coming years.
STRONGER EXTERNAL ECONOMY IMPORTANT FOR SWEDISH RECOVERY
The fourth quarter of 2013 saw extensive stockbuilding by firms
after two quarters of destocking, and government consumption increased
considerably, due partly to temporary factors. Indicators point to
significantly lower growth in the first quarter this year, with GDP
forecast to rise by just 0.1 per cent. GDP will then grow more quickly,
and resource utilisation will rise as the economy continues to improve
in 2014-2018. The severe economic downturn in connection with the
financial crisis has meant that the current slump has been unusually
protracted. By the time resource utilisation in the economy as a whole
normalises at the beginning of 2017, the slump will have lasted for a
period of eight years.
The recovery in the Swedish economy can to a great extent be
explained by the brighter economic outlook abroad. The NIER estimates
that demand for Swedish exports will grow by an average of almost 5 per
cent per year in 2014-2018 (see Dia gram 20). Export growth will be
somewhat below the historical average in 2014-2018, however, and the
recovery will be more dependent on a higher rate of growth in domestic
demand. Reduced uncertainty and an investment backlog in the household
and business sectors will contribute to increased domestic demand in the
coming years. Economic policy will be important in supporting this
process. As new instruments for macro-prudential supervision are still
relatively untested, the Riksbank is expected to continue to make
allowance for household debt levels in the formulation of its monetary
policy, which will delay the Swedish recovery slightly. Monetary policy
is nevertheless expected to remain expansionary in the coming years (see
Diagram 21 and the section "Monetary Policy and Exchange
Rates" later in this chapter). This is particularly important given
that fiscal policy is expected to be tightened in order to meet the
surplus target in 2018.
STRONG CONSUMPTION GROWTH AFTER A LENGTHY PERIOD OF UNCERTAINTY AND
HIGH SAVING
There has been great uncertainty about the economy in the wake of
the financial and debt crises. Over the past year, however, consumer
confidence has increased in many OECD countries, including Sweden.
Although the consumer confidence indicator in the Economic Tendency
Survey has fallen back at the beginning of 2014, it is still close to
the historical average, and its recovery in 2013 reflects growing
optimism. The rise in the saving rate to record levels indicates that
the uncertainty has caused households to postpone consumption. As
uncertainty in the household sector eases further, the high level of
saving will facilitate increased consumption (see Diagram 22).
Consumption growth will also be supported by low interest rates and
further employment growth. All in all, this means that household
consumption expenditure will grow by 2.8 per cent in 2014 and by an
average of 2.7 per cent per year in 2015-2018. The saving rate will
therefore drop back to around 7 per cent of disposable income in 2018.
[GRAPHIC 20 OMITTED]
[GRAPHIC 21 OMITTED]
[GRAPHIC 22 OMITTED]
[GRAPHIC 23 OMITTED]
[GRAPHIC 24 OMITTED]
Growth in general government consumption will accelerate from 1.2
per cent in 2014 to 1.8 per cent in 2018. This mainly reflects a growing
need for public services towards the end of the forecast period as the
proportions of children and elderly in the population rise more quickly.
INVESTMENT BACKLOG SPELLS HIGHER INVESTMENT GROWTH
Investment, which normally varies considerably over the course of a
business cycle, fell by no less than 15 per cent in the crisis year of
2009. Despite relatively strong growth in subsequent years, investment
is still much lower relative to GDP than before the crisis. The
investment-to-GDP ratio will increase in 2014, and the NIER expects that
it will then rise further and move above 20 per cent for a few years to
build up stocks of real capital.
According to both Statistics Sweden and the Economic Tendency
Survey, capacity utilisation in industry increased in 2013. The recovery
in demand in the coming years means that capacity utilisation will
continue to rise, increasing the need for investment. A pent-up need for
new housing also spells a rapid increase in housing investment in the
coming years. For example, investment in new housing is forecast to grow
by almost 20 per cent in 2014. This means that investment as a whole
will grow relatively quickly at the beginning of the forecast period and
slightly exceed 20 per cent of GDP in 2018 (see Diagram 23). Investment
is expected to average around 20 per cent of GDP in the longer term.
RECOVERY LEADS TO LOWER UNEMPLOYMENT
Although GDP will grow by 2.7 per cent in 2014, unemployment will
fall only marginally to 7.9 per cent and will therefore still be
slightly more than 1 percentage point above the NIER's estimate of
equilibrium unemployment for 2014. This is because the labour force is
continuing to grow relatively quickly. Unemployment is then expected to
fall gradually, due partly to the number of employed rising somewhat
faster when resource utilisation at firms normalises, and partly to
growth in the labour force slowing with growth in the working-age
population (see Diagram 24). By 2017, unemployment will have fallen to
6.5 per cent and the labour market will be more or less in equilibrium
(see Table 6).
WAGE GROWTH CLOSE TO 3 PER CENT PER YEAR IN 2014-2018
Most of the central pay settlements reached in 2013 run for three
years. High unemployment has meant that the wage growth resulting from
these agreements is lower than normal. Low resource utilisation can also
be expected to rein in wage drift over and above this. All in all,
therefore, wages are expected to grow somewhat more slowly during the
current three-year period than the average for 1997-2012 of 3.4 per
cent. Wage growth will be 2.8 per cent in 2014, but will climb to 3.3
per cent in 2018 due to rising resource utilisation in the labour market
in the coming years (see Diagram 25).
After increasing slowly in 2013, unit labour costs in the business
sector will rise by 1.2 per cent this year and an average of 1.3 per
cent per year in 2015-2018. This level of growth is believed to be
compatible with inflation close to 2 per cent in the longer term and
means that labour costs' share of value added in the business
sector will fall marginally in 2014-2018.
LOW INFLATION FOR YEARS TO COME
Weak resource utilisation in Sweden and large parts of the rest of
the world has made it hard for firms to raise prices, and inflation has
remained low despite relatively strong growth in unit labour costs in
2011 and 2012. Resource utilisation will improve gradually in the coming
years, which can be expected to bring somewhat faster price rises. The
krona will continue to strengthen, however, which will put a damper on
import prices. All in all, inflation as measured by the CPIF (consumer
price index with constant mortgage rates) will remain low and will not
reach the inflation target until the end of 2017 (see Diagram 26). The
Riksbank will begin raising the repo rate in the third quarter of 2015,
and mortgage rates will then also start to rise, helping CPI inflation
to hit 2 per cent about a year earlier.
[GRAPHIC 25 OMITTED]
[GRAPHIC 26 OMITTED]
[GRAPHIC 27 OMITTED]
[GRAPHIC 28 OMITTED]
[GRAPHIC 29 OMITTED]
Monetary Policy and Exchange Rates
UNCHANGED REPO RATE
The Riksbank decided to leave the repo rate at 0.75 per cent in
February, and its forecast for the repo rate was also largely unchanged.
Low resource utilisation and low expected inflation have led to
record-low interest rates since the most intense phase of the financial
crisis. At the same time, the Riksbank has long expressed concern about
growth in household debt. The Riksbank's reasoning is that
excessive debt brings a risk that households will be forced to sharply
increase saving at some point, which could have unfavourable effects on
the real economy and jeopardise the achievement of monetary policy goals
beyond the bank's forecast horizon. (4) A majority of the
Riksbank's executive board has presented this argument in recent
years for not lowering the policy rate further.
Based on forward pricing, market players generally expect interest
rates to start going up rather later and rather more slowly than
indicated by the Riksbank's interest rate path (see Diagram 27).
One likely explanation is that market players expect inflation to remain
significantly below target even in two years' time (see Diagram
28). The Riksbank's forecast from February indicates that CPIF
inflation will be close to 2 per cent by the end of 2015, which is much
earlier than in the NIER's forecast (see Diagram 29).
DEBT LEVELS IMPACTING ON MONETARY POLICY
Despite the actions already taken, the NIER believes that household
debt will grow slightly more quickly than disposable income in the
coming years, moving the debt-to-income ratio even higher. Since the
effects on the debt-to-income ratio of previous measures and untested
new instruments for macroprudential supervision are uncertain or hard to
gauge, it is assumed that this growth in the ratio will mean that the
Riksbank continues to make allowance for household debt levels in the
formulation of monetary policy. In other words, the Riksbank will pursue
a slightly less expansionary monetary policy line than would otherwise
have been the case. In the short term, this will come at the cost of
lower resource utilisation and of inflation undershooting the target for
somewhat longer.
While accepting that there may be risks associated with high levels
of household debt, the NIER does not currently see any justification for
making allowance for these risks in the formulation of monetary policy.
Fundamental factors appear to explain much of the increase in household
debt, and the weight of evidence suggests that changes in the central
bank policy rate do not have any significant impact on debt levels and
house prices. (5)
LOW POLICY RATES ABROAD KEY TO MOVEMENTS IN REPO RATE
Interest rates outside Sweden, especially in the euro area, will
remain very low throughout the forecast period (see Diagrams 30 and 31).
This is due largely to continued debt consolidation in both the
government and household sectors limiting the expansionary effect of
central bank policy rates on demand. Very low interest rates will
therefore be needed for a long period by historical standards,
supplemented with unconventional measures to increase resource
utilisation and push inflation towards the target levels.
Sweden's expansionary monetary policy has cushioned the
drop-off in demand and been an important factor in the economic recovery
that commenced at the end of last year. The deep slump still engulfing
many of Sweden's export markets means that economic recovery in
Sweden will be slow, however, and so monetary policy will need to remain
expansionary for a long time. Household debt will also increase slightly
relative to disposable income. To rein in household debt and avoid
excessively high resource utilisation further ahead, with inflation
overshooting the target, the Riksbank will begin to raise the repo rate
gradually from the third quarter of 2015. Monetary policy will thus help
resource utilisation in the economy as a whole to normalise in 2017. The
repo rate will then still be at much lower levels than have historically
been associated with normal resource utilisation. With very low interest
rates abroad, a higher repo rate in Sweden would cause the krona to
appreciate, which would slow recovery and further subdue inflation. A
return to more normal resource utilisation outside Sweden, with gently
rising interest rates, will see the Riksbank gradually raise the repo
rate to 3 per cent at the end of 2018 (see Diagram 32).
[GRAPHIC 30 OMITTED]
[GRAPHIC 31 OMITTED]
[GRAPHIC 32 OMITTED]
[GRAPHIC 33 OMITTED]
[GRAPHIC 34 OMITTED]
GOVERNMENT BOND YIELDS TO RISE AS THE GLOBAL ECONOMY RECOVERS
In the wake of the financial crisis and the ensuing debt crisis,
many countries have pursued highly expansionary monetary policy to
counter weak domestic and external demand. This expansionary monetary
policy has entailed not only very low policy rates but also
unconventional measures, such as extensive bond purchases by central
banks, which have sent government bond yields to very low levels.
Considerable uncertainty about the economic outlook has also caused many
investors to move into low-risk assets, which has further eroded yields.
Now that uncertainty about the recovery in the major economies is
easing, demand for riskier assets is picking up, and this may help
explain the stock market rally in many countries over the past year. It
has also meant that demand for safe government bonds in countries with
stable government finances is waning. As unconventional monetary policy
measures also start to be phased out, and central bank policy rates
begin to be raised in many of the major economies, yields will rise
further. By historical standards, however, short-term interest rates
will rise slowly in both the euro area and the US, which means that
government bond yields will remain low for a long period (see Diagram
33). Swedish 10-year government bond yields will follow the
international pattern and climb to 2.9 per cent in 2015 and 4.3 per cent
in 2018 (see Table 8).
STRONGER KRONA IN THE COMING YEARS
The krona as measured by the effective exchange rate index KIX has
strengthened by almost 1 per cent so far this year and is now almost 7
per cent stronger than it was in August 2008 before declining as a
result of the financial crisis (see Diagram 34). In real terms, the KIX
index has strengthened by approximately 2 per cent over the same period.
Smaller trade surpluses are expected to coincide with a strengthening of
the real exchange rate against several trading partner currencies. The
KIX index also includes several emerging market currencies. In the
slightly longer term, these countries are expected to have higher
productivity growth than Sweden, which suggests that the krona will
weaken against their currencies in real terms. All in all, the krona is
forecast to appreciate in real terms by almost 1 per cent by 2018.
Higher external inflation means that it will strengthen slightly further
in nominal terms (see Diagram 34 and Table 9).
Fiscal Policy
FISCAL TIGHTENING TO COMMENCE NEXT YEAR
Fiscal policy was expansionary in 2013 and contributed to
cyclically-adjusted general government net lending falling to -1 per
cent of potential GDP after being slightly positive in 2012. Unfunded
measures amounted to around SEK 25 billion and included a reduction in
the corporate income tax rate from 26.3 to 22 per cent and initiatives
on the expenditure side in areas such as education, research, justice
and the labour market.
The Budget Bill for 2014 contained proposals for unfunded measures
totalling SEK 24 billion. The Riksdag rejected the proposed increase in
the threshold for state income tax, leaving measures amounting to SEK 21
billion. (6) A fifth earned-income tax credit is the largest of these
and is expected to reduce tax revenue by SEK 12 billion. Combined with
much lower dividends from state-owned enterprises this year, these
measures mean that cyclically-adjusted net lending will fall slightly
further this year to -1.3 per cent of potential GDP (see Diagram 35).
Next year, fiscal policy is expected to include spending increases
of SEK 10 billion funded by tax increases of the same magnitude.
Whatever the outcome of the parliamentary elections in the autumn, it
can be assumed that there will be some spending increases or tax cuts.
In the absence of fiscal space, however, the scope of these measures is
expected to be limited. Although the net effect on cyclically-adjusted
net lending of active fiscal policy measures is expected to be neutral,
due to automatic budget strengthening net lending will still increase by
0.8 per cent. The fiscal policy stance is therefore expected to be
contractionary next year.
TIGHTENING CONTINUES THROUGH TO 2018
The fiscal policy forecast for 2016 onwards is guided by the
principles for the Swedish fiscal policy framework. The corner stone in
this assessment is the surplus target for net lending, but the
expenditure ceiling and the balanced budget requirement for the local
government sector are also taken into account. The surplus target means
that net lending in the general government sector is to average 1 per
cent of GDP over a business cycle. For net lending to reach this level
on average, the NIER believes that cyclically-adjusted net lending needs
to be 1.2 per cent of GDP when resource utilisation in the economy is
normal. (7) The fiscal policy forecast assumes that fiscal policy in the
longer term will be steered towards the surplus target, and that any
departures from the target will gradually be corrected, taking due
account of economic developments and other factors.
[GRAPHIC 35 OMITTED]
The present forecast assumes that the output gap will close in
2017, which means that the economy will then feature normal levels of
resource utilisation (see Diagram 36). Since the surplus target requires
cyclically-adjusted net lending to increase by no less than 2.5 per cent
of potential GDP, from -1.3 per cent this year to the target level of
1.2 per cent, it is likely that a return to the surplus target will take
somewhat longer than the period to 2017. Reaching the target of 1.2 per
cent in 2017 would require relatively far-reaching discretionary
tightening over a three-year period. The forecast therefore assumes
tightening at a rate that brings cyclically-adjusted net lending back to
1.2 per cent only in 2018. Fiscal policy will therefore remain
contractionary in 2016- 2018.
[GRAPHIC 36 OMITTED]
NO SPACE FOR UNFUNDED MEASURES IN THE COMING YEARS
The NIER also estimates general government net lending based on
unchanged rules--in other words, in the absence of measures beyond those
already decided upon. (8) This differs from the NIER's fiscal
policy forecast, but enables comparison with the government's
forecast for public finances in the medium term. The calculations are
also used for the assessment of fiscal space (previously referred to as
the scope for reforms).
Unchanged rules would mean that cyclically-adjusted net lending
rises much more slowly than in the NIER's forecast, reaching a
level of 0.1 per cent of GDP in 2018 rather than 1.2 per cent (see Table
10). In other words, in the absence of active decisions on fiscal
tightening, net lending would be substantially weaker than is compatible
with the surplus target.
The NIER uses developments in cyclically-adjusted net lending with
unchanged rules to assess the amount of fiscal space on a five-year
horizon. Fiscal space is defined here as the scope for unfunded measures
that have an enduring impact on the budget, which is why fiscal space is
not assessed for individual years. Fiscal space can be seen as any
surplus arising in public finances with unchanged rules over and above
that which is required by the surplus target. The reason why such a
surplus can arise is that tax revenue largely follows GDP, while
expenditure tends to fall in relation to GDP. (9)
The NIER assumes that 1.2 per cent of GDP is the level of
cyclically-adjusted net lending that is compatible with the surplus
target with normal resource utilisation in the economy. As resource
utilisation is expected to return to normal within a five-year period,
net lending of 1.2 per cent in 2018 is the starting point for the
calculation of fiscal space. The estimated fiscal space on a five-year
horizon therefore emerges as the difference between net lending in 2018
with unchanged rules and the target level of 1.2 per cent. Since
cyclically-adjusted net lending will be just 0.1 per cent in 2018 with
unchanged rules, fiscal space is negative at -1.1 per cent of GDP, or a
negative SEK 47 billion. (10) This negative fiscal space should be
interpreted as the amount of fiscal tightening required to meet the
surplus target in the form of increases in taxes, decreases in
expenditure or a combination of the two.
The fact that fiscal policy needs to be tightened for the surplus
target to be met does not rule out the possibility of measures that
increase central government expenditure. In the absence of fiscal space,
however, these measures must be fully funded by corresponding tax
increases or spending cuts in other areas.
[GRAPHIC 37 OMITTED]
FISCAL POLICY WILL FEATURE TAX INCREASES
The NIER has forecast the content of fiscal policy in 2016-2018 on
the basis of the tightening required to gradually reach the surplus
target in 2018 and the increase in expenditure needed to maintain the
public sector commitment. (11)
For the period 2016-2018, the measures forecast on the expenditure
side of the central government budget correspond to an unchanged public
sector commitment at 2015 levels. This means decisions on expenditure
increases of SEK 43 billion (see Table 11). This expenditure comprises
increased central government consumption and increased central
government grants to the local government sector in Une with demographic
developments, plus increased replacement levels in the transfer systems
in line with nominal wages. For the full period 2015-2018, expenditure
increases of SEK 53 billion are forecast, including SEK 10 billion in
2015.
On the income side of the central government budget, total tax
increases of SEK 100 billion are assumed for 2015-2018. These will not
only finance the measures on the expenditure side (SEK 53 billion) but
also provide the fiscal tightening required to reach the surplus target
in 2018 (SEK 47 billion). Together with tax increases in the local
government sector, this translates into a rise in the overall tax-to-GDP
ratio from today's 44 per cent to just over 46 per cent in 2018.
(12) This means that the ratio will return to around the level
prevailing in 2008-2009 (see Diagram 37). The net effect of the measures
forecast for 2015-2018 on cyclically-adjusted net lending is SEK 47
billion and corresponds to the negative fiscal space.
Fiscal policy concepts
Cyclically-adjusted net lending is an estimate of general
government net lending with normal resource utilisation (economy at
capacity) and a normal composition of the main tax bases. It is usually
expressed as a percentage of potential GDP.
The fiscal policy stance in any given year is determined by the
change in cyclically-adjusted net lending in relation to potential GDP.
A decrease in cyclically-adjusted net lending indicates that fiscal
policy is expansionary in terms of resource utilisation (the output gap)
in the economy. The reason may be that cyclically-adjusted tax revenue
rises more slowly than potential GDP (due to lower tax rates, for
example), that general government expenditure rises more quickly than
potential GDP, or a combination of the two. Similarly, an increase in
cyclically-adjusted net lending indicates that fiscal policy Is
contractionary. Fiscal policy is neutral when cyclically-adjusted net
lending is unchanged in relation to potential GDP.
Unfunded measures are fiscal policy decisions to increase
expenditure and/or decrease taxes that are not funded by decisions to
decrease expenditure and/or increase taxes in other areas by the same
amount. Such measures therefore erode general government net lending and
normally have a positive effect (multiplier) on GDP.
Unchanged rules are defined as how fiscal policy variables develop
with no further fiscal policy decisions being taken by the government or
parliament. In practice, however, there are significant demarcation
problems.
Automatic budget strengthening refers to the increase In general
government net lending that normally occurs even with unchanged rules.
This tightening is a result of tax revenue moving largely in line with
GDP, while expenditure tends to fall in relation to GDP with unchanged
rules.
(4) See the article "Financial imbalances in the monetary
policy assessment" in Monetary Policy Report, July 2013, Sveriges
Riksbank.
(5) See the article "The effects of monetary policy on
household debt", Monetary Policy Report, February 2014, Sveriges
Riksbank.
(6) See the special analysis "The Budget Bill for 2014"
in The Swedish Economy, December 2013, for a more detailed examination
of the content of the bill.
(7) The conclusion that cyclically-adjusted net lending needs to be
1.2 per cent of GDP with normal resource utilisation for the surplus
target to be met, rather than 1 per cent, is based on an assumption that
the business cycle is asymmetrical with more lows than highs. See the
special analysis "The Surplus Target for General Government
Finances" in The Swedish Economy, March 2013.
(8) Unchanged rules here means the rules after the implementation
of the measures proposed in the Budget Bill for 2014, excluding the
increase in the threshold for state income tax. See
www.konj.se/alternativfinanspolitik for a model-based macroeconomic forecast assuming unchanged fiscal policy (in Swedish).
(9) See the special analysis "The NIER's Assessment of
the Scope for Reforms", The Swedish Economy, March 2013, for a more
detailed analysis of the automatic stabilising effect of unchanged
rules.
(10) This is SEK 9 billion less than indicated in The Swedish
Economy, December 2013, when fiscal space was forecast to be a negative
SEK 56 billion. The change is due mainly to revisions of general
government interest Income and costs.
(11) This forecast, which is associated with considerable
uncertainty, does not necessarily reflect what the NIER considers to be
the most appropriate fiscal policy.
(12) Taxes In the local government sector are forecast to be raised
by a total of 0.34 per cent In 2015-2018, or SEK 8 billion, resulting in
total tax increases in the period of SEK 108 billion. The NIER estimates
that the total financing required for the general government sector to
meet the surplus target in 2018 and maintain the public sector
commitment at 2014 levels is SEK 112 billion. This figure is the sum of
the negative fiscal space (SEK 47 billion) and the total spending
increases of SEK 65 billion needed to keep the public sector commitment
unchanged at 2014 levels.
Table 3 GDP and CPI, world-wide
Percentage change
2012 2013 2014 2015
GDP, OECD 1.5 1.3 2.2 2.6
GDP, emerging
markets (1) 5.1 4.9 5.2 5.3
GDP, world-wide 3.2 3.0 3.7 4.0
CPI, OECD 2.2 1.6 1.8 2.0
CPI, world-wide 4.0 3.8 3.7 3.6
2016 2017 2018
GDP, OECD 2.5 2.4 2.2
GDP, emerging
markets (1) 5.7 5.7 5.9
GDP, world-wide 4.1 4.1 4.1
CPI, OECD 2.1 2.2 2.2
CPI, world-wide 3.4 3.4 3.4
(1) Emerging markets here refer to all non-OECD
member countries.
Note. GDP figures are calendar-adjusted and in
constant prices. Aggregates are calculated using
purchasing-power adjusted GDP weights from the IMF.
Sources: IMF, OECD and NIER.
Table 4 Potential GDP, employment and productivity
Percentage change unless otherwise noted
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Potential GDP 1.7 2.0 2.2 2.5 2.4 2.2
Potential hours worked 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.5
Potential employment 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5
Of which demographic
contribution (1) 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3
Potential productivity 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.6
Potential productivity,
business sector 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.1
(1) Contribution to potential employment due to population
growth, percentage points. In addition, the development of
potential employment is also affected by the business cycle
and by economic policy.
Sources: Statistics Sweden and NIER.
Table 5 GDP by expenditure
Percentage change, constant prices, calendar-adjusted values
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Household consumption
expenditure 2.0 2.8 2.3 3.1 3.0 2.3
General government
consumption expenditure 2.0 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.8 1.8
Gross fixed capital
formation -1.3 6.1 7.8 5.9 4.7 3.6
Final domestic demand 1.3 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.1 2.5
Stockbuilding1 0.2 0.3 -0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total domestic demand 1.5 3.3 3.1 3.3 3.1 2.5
Exports -0.9 4.6 5.1 5.0 4.9 4.7
Total demand 0.7 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.7 3.2
Imports -1.2 6.2 5.7 6.1 5.8 5.1
Net exports 0.1 -0.4 0.0 -0.2 -0.2 0.0
GDP 1.5 2.7 2.9 2.9 2.7 2.4
(1) Change in per cent of GDP preceding year.
Sources: Statistics Sweden and NIER.
Table 6 Labour market
Percentage change
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Hours worked (1) 0.4 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.1 0.8
Employed 1.0 0.9 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.8
Labour force 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.4
Unemployment (2) 8.0 7.9 7.3 6.8 6.5 6.2
(1) Calendar-adjusted. (2) Per cent of labour force.
Sources: Statistics Sweden and NIER.
Table 7 Earnings and prices
Percentage change
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Hourly earnings (1) 2.6 2.8 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.3
Hourly earnings,
business sector 2.5 2.7 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.3
Unit labour cost,
business sector 0.4 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.4
CPI 0.0 0.1 1.2 2.3 2.6 2.8
CPIF 0.9 0.7 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.1
(1) According to Short-term Earnings Statistics.
Sources: National Mediation Office, Statistics Sweden and NIER.
Table 8 Interest rates
Per cent
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
At year-end
Repo rate 0.75 0.75 1.25 1.75 2.25 3.00
Annual average
Repo rate 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.5 2.0 2.6
5-year government bond 1.6 1.7 2.4 3.0 3.6 4.0
10-year government bond 2.1 2.4 2.9 3.5 3.9 4.3
Sources: The Riksbank and NIER.
Table 9 Exchange rates
Index 1992-11-18=100 and SEK per currency
unit, respectively
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
KIX 103.0 102.5 100.5 99.2 99.5 99.8
Euro 8.65 8.79 8.52 8.35 8.37 8.39
US dollar 6.51 6.49 6.52 6.55 6.57 6.58
Sources: The Riksbank and NIER.
Table 10 General government net lending and cyclically
adjusted net lending
Per cent of GDP and per cent of potential GDP
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Net lending -1.3 -2.0 -0.8 -0.3 0.6 1.3
Net lending
excl. fiscal
policy 2015-2018 -1.3 -2.0 -0.9 -0.4 -0.2 0.2
Cyclically adjusted
net lending -1.0 -1.3 -0.5 0.0 0.6 1.2
Cyclically adjusted
net lending excl.
fiscal policy
2015-2018 -1.0 -1.3 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1
Source: NIER.
Table 11 Forecast fiscal policy and automatic budget
strengthening, 2015-2018
SEK billion and per cent of
potential GDP, respectively
2015-
2015 2016 2017 2018 2018
Income policy measures 10 14 37 39 100
Expenditure policy 10 15 10 18 53
measures
Fiscal policy effect on
cyclically adjusted
0 0 27 20 47
Per cent of 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.4 1.0
potential GDP
Automatic budget 0.8 0.5 0.0 0.2 1.5
strengthening (1)
Change in
cyclically adjusted
net lending (1,2) 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.6 2.5
Cyclically adjusted -0.5 0.0 0.6 1.2
net lending (1)
(1) Per cent of potential GDP. 2 The change in cyclically
adjusted net lending consists of the sum of the fiscal
policy effect and the automatic budget strengthening.
Note. Due to rounding, components may not add up.
Source: NIER.