Small business growth: development of indicators.
Howard, Jack L.
ABSTRACT
While small businesses continue to flourish in the private sector,
there still continue to be small businesses that either do not
experience the success that the owners desire or that ultimately fail.
In order to better understand the conditions that indicate when a small
business is growing or ready to grow, not only do indicators of growth
need to be developed, additional indicators concerning the
organization's plans, communication, and human resource management
issues of trust and challenges need to be examined, since these issues
might influence organizational growth. This article attempts to develop
instruments that can be used to assess small businesses and the
conditions that need to be present in the business in order to enhance
the likelihood of successful growth of the business.
INTRODUCTION
A large component of the U.S. economy is the result of successful
small businesses. To illustrate the role that small businesses play in
the U.S. economy, statistics found in small business textbooks (e.g.,
Scarborough & Zimmerer, 2003) indicate that small businesses account
for the following:
* 98.5 percent of all businesses;
* 75.8 percent of the nation's new jobs;
* 52 percent of the private sector workforce;
* 51 percent of private sector GDP; and
* 47 percent of business sales.
These facts provide evidence that small businesses are important to
the health of the U.S. economy.
While the role that small business plays is impressive, it is also
important to recognize that big business and corporate America is not
employing as many people as it has in the past, as evidenced by
continuing downsizing and layoffs (Howard, 2001). In addition to
representing such a significant portion of the U.S. economy, when young
adults move into the workforce, 67 percent obtain their first employment
in small businesses (Scarborough & Zimmerer, 2003). Even though the
evidence demonstrates that small business accounts for a majority of the
U.S. workforce and new job creation, much of the research on small
business growth focuses on profits, sales, and market share, largely
ignoring growth of the workforce. Most of the research on the growth of
the workforce has been either exploratory or descriptive in nature, but
has not effectively addressed the issue that growth in the workforce can
lead to increased profits, sales and market share (Howard, 2001).
The present study attempts to extend preliminary research conducted
by Howard (2001), where the focus was to begin to determine when a small
business owner might consider expanding his or her workforce. Planning,
communication, trust and additional human resource management concerns
that might influence organizational growth in areas such as profits,
sales and market share will also be considered. Planning in small
business has not only been found to exist, but has been found to
influence the success of the small business, and that to successfully
expand the workforce, planning must be completed (Barringer &
Greening, 1998; Howard, 2001; Morrison, Breen & Ali, 2003).
Communication has been identified as an area to address when expanding
the workforce in small businesses, and that effective communication can
assist the organization in its operations, thus having a potential
influence on organizational growth (Greening, Barringer & Macy,
1996; Nichols-Nixon, 2005). Trusting employees has been found to have a
positive influence on organizational profits, while human resource
problems have not only been found to exist as small businesses grow, but
that organizations do make efforts to address these problems (Howard,
2001; Kotey & Slade, 2005). First, this study will discuss the
literature to date, focusing on growth, planning, communication, trust
and human resource problems. Second, the research method will be
described. Third, the measures being examined for inclusion in the
various scales will be presented. Fourth, the results of the scale
development will be presented. Finally, a discussion of the implications
of the scales will be presented.
LITERATURE REVIEW OF SMALL BUSINESS GROWTH
When examining the literature on small business, it quickly becomes
apparent that there are many different definitions of what constitutes a
small business. In addition to a variety of definitions, there are also
many different conditions that influence whether a business is
considered small. Given these definitions and conditions, a small
business is "one that is independently owned and operated and not
dominant in its field of operation" (Hodgetts & Kuratko, 1995,
p. 6). Additionally, as the definition pertains to the present study,
the following conditions apply:
* fewer than 250 employees in the manufacturing sector;
* less than $22 million in annual sales in the wholesale sector;
* less than $7.5 million in annual sales in the retail sector; and
* less than $10 million in annual sales in the service sector
(Hodgetts & Kuratko, 1995).
Given that the present study focuses on the development of
instruments that are designed to measure conditions within a small
business that may be related to profits, sales and market share, all
functions of firm growth, the literature review will also focus on firm
growth. Additionally, references will be made to human resource
management issues, such as the expansion of the workforce, planning,
trust, communication in organizations and human resource problems that
small businesses face, given that these issues can influence the growth
of small businesses.
Firm Growth
In the late 1990s, the U.S. economy was very good, resulting in an
increase in the number of small businesses. Even though the economy in
the early 21st century was not as good as the years leading up to this
century, small businesses continue to blossom, as evidenced by the role
they play in the U.S. economy (Scarborough & Zimmerer, 2003).
Flamholtz (1990) has laid out a framework describing how businesses
grow. While Flamholtz (1990) identifies seven stages of organizational
growth, the first 3 stages are of particular importance and interest to
small business (Howard, 2001). The first stage is that of new venture,
which is when a small business is just beginning. Markets and products
are being defined and developed in this stage. The second stage is
expansion, and can focus on increased sales, revenues, market share, and
ultimately the number of employees (Flamholtz, 1990). The third stage is
professionalization, and focuses on formalizing the goals, processes and
functions of the organization, and is considered to be closely related
to expansion (Howard, 2001). Stage four is consolidation, and focuses on
issues faced by firms once they have made the transition to
professionally managed organizations with working systems in place,
focusing more on managing its corporate culture (Flamholtz, 1990).
Diversification is the fifth phase, focusing on developing new products
for the markets to which the organization is already providing goods and
services (Flamholtz, 1990). The sixth stage is integration, focusing on
developing an infrastructure to support multiple business units
(Flamholtz, 1990). The final stage is that of decline and
revitalization, and focuses on rebuilding the organization at all
levels, to ensure continued survival (Flamholtz, 1990). Stages four
through seven of firm growth are of concern for older and larger
organizations, and are not pertinent issues for small business.
Examining stages two and three more closely, human resource
management concerns begin to enter the picture in these stages. During
expansion there may be a need for an increase in the number of
employees. This can be a result of trying to increase sales and market
share, as well as organizations having to battle turnover of employees
(Flamholtz, 1990). Additional problems result because of the increased
growth, resulting in situations where employees believe that they know
what the status of the inventory of the product, only to find out later
that the product they believed to be in the inventory is gone
(Flamholtz, 1990). This situation is indicative of a number of possible
problems, but communication may be the underlying factor in this
situation. Finally, it might be the case during this stage that business
owners are directly involved in many facets of the organization's
operations, retaining considerable control over decisions. This could be
out of necessity, but it might also be out of a lack of trust that
employees can do the job precisely as the business owner desires.
Planning
During professionalization, management systems focusing on
planning, organization, management development and control are developed
(Flamholtz, 1990). The formalization places an emphasis on
organizational planning, which may include the number of employees in
the organization. Additionally, control measures could also include
enhancing communication in the organization, as well as addressing human
resource management problems.
Over the past decade, small business research has begun to
incorporate human resource management concerns into the research issues.
While initial research was largely descriptive, more recent research has
begun to examine the issue of the conditions that exist when a small
business owner should expand his or her workforce (Hodgetts &
Kuratko, 1995; Howard, 2001; Tucci, Wyld & Cappel, 1997). This
begins to move research on small business into the realm of
understanding what activities a small business owner should undertake so
that his or her business is in a position of effectively expand its
workforce. Even though there has been only a small amount of research
conducted to date examining when a small business owner should expand
his or her workforce, one must remember that in many instances, small
businesses fail to develop a formal business plan. Bhide (2000) found
that only 21 percent of successful businesses had formal business plans
in place, leading to the possibility that human resource planning may
not occur (Howard, 2001). Furthermore, it has been acknowledged that
formal policies and procedures have not existed in many growing small
businesses, and that a reliance on shared business logic is not unusual
(Nicholls-Nixon, 2005). This might indicate that many businesses move
forward without a sound business plan, let alone a developed plan of
when to increase the size of their workforce.
While formal planning may not be prevalent in small business, there
is evidence that planning is related to the success of small businesses.
In two different qualitative studies (Barringer & Greening, 1998;
Greening et al., 1996) evidence was found that in order to successfully
expand the workforce of a small business, planning for growth must be
carefully done, considering a wide variety of human resource management
issues, such as revision of compensation plans and providing realistic
expectations to new employees. Research also has demonstrated that using
business plans has a positive relationship with growth that is greater
than industry norms (Morrison et al., 2003). Furthermore, a recent study
found that as small businesses grow, they formalize their human resource
policies and recordkeeping (Kotey & Slade, 2005). If employment
policies are being formalized as a firm grows, it also might be expected
that planning will become more formalized, as well as increase. Finally,
small businesses employing strategies that were forward-looking were
found to have a positive, direct effect on employment (Gray, 1999). All
of this evidence indicates that planning in small business may be an
indicator of when a small business should expand its workforce (Howard,
2001).
Studies examining the relationship between increases in revenue and
increases in employees have indicated that increases in the number of
employees were tied to increases in revenue (Box, Crouch & Clow,
1998; Gray, 1999). The key finding of these studies is that they begin
to reveal that some businesses clearly understand that increasing the
number of employees leads to increased profitability. These businesses
know that sometimes the key to increasing revenues it to invest in
expanding the workforce (Howard, 2001).
Communication
A second area of interest as small businesses expand their
workforce is the importance of communication. Communication with
employees should be focused at ensuring that employees understand the
direction of the organization, leading to a sharing of the
organization's vision and objectives (Dyer, 1996). When
organizations expand, communication difficulties have developed, and it
is important to attempt to proactively address potential communication
issues before and during the time when expanding the workforce (Greening
et al., 1996). The communication ensures that all employees understand
the shared business logic of the organization, assisting the
organization in its operations (Nicholls-Nixon, 2005). Consistent with
these findings, Howard (2001) found that communication of the
organization's plans through meetings demonstrated a positive,
significant correlation with growth of organizational profits. These
studies all indicate that increased communication not only facilitates
growth of small businesses, but that communication can be used to reduce
the number of problems and difficulties faced when expanding the
workforce.
Trust
Trust is an issue that has not been widely studied in relation to
growth in small business. However, trust has been found to have a
significant, positive correlation with organizational profits (Howard,
2001). Small business owners and managers in small business need to be
able to trust their employees. If they do not develop some level of
trust in their employees, they may find themselves attempting to
complete tasks and jobs themselves rather than delegating tasks to
employees. This can lead to an underutilization of employees, as well as
contributing to the burnout of small business owners and managers. While
not widely studied, since trust has demonstrated a significant
relationship with organizational profits, it should be more closely
examined to determine if it has any relationship on the growth of small
business.
Human Resource Problems
As a small business expands its workforce, it is reasonable to
expect that the organization will experience some problems of a human
resource management nature. This could be the reason that small
businesses formalize their human resource policies and recordkeeping as
they grow, since many small businesses do not have an employee dedicated
to human resource management issues, as the small business owner or
managers may be addressing human resource management issues on their own
as needed (Kotey & Slade, 2005). Regardless of the cause, it is
important to understand that these problems can develop. In an
exploratory study by Howard (2001), a wide variety of human resource
problems were identified by owners, managers and employees of small
business. Most notably, staffing problems and appropriate salaries were
noted as contributing to problems in the organization. While many other
more specific problems were identified, staffing and compensation are
functional areas of human resource management that might influence
successful growth of small business. Effective human resource management
ensures that the right number of employees with the right skills are in
the right place at the right time. Given this, human resource problems
might significantly influence small business growth, and should be
examined more systematically.
The discussion of the literature indicates that preliminary
investigations indicate that firm growth, communication, organizational
trust in employees and human resource management problems appear to be
consistent concerns for small businesses as they expand their workforce.
In order to better determine the influences of these issues, the present
study attempts to develop scales of firm growth, communication, trust
and human resource management problems. These scales are being developed
specifically for small business for potential use as indicators as the
effects of firm growth, planning, communication, trust and human
resource management problems on organizational profits, sales and market
share, among other potential uses. Ultimately, it is believed that these
scales might be used to indicate when a small business might expand its
workforce.
METHOD
This section describes the research techniques used to develop that
scales that measure firm growth, planning, communication, trust and
human resource problems. The sample, procedure and analyses conducted
will be described in the following subsections of this paper.
Sample
To establish the reliabilities of the scales, a systematic, random
sample was drawn from a 10 county area in the Midwestern section of the
United Sates. A list of 4000 small businesses was obtained from the
State of Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs.
Selection of organizations was based on a rule of selecting every other
organization, resulting in a sampling of 2000 small businesses.
Responding organizations ranged in size from 2 to 600 full time
equivalent (FTE) employees, with a mean of 48.6 FTEs. Organizational
sales ranged from $60,000 to $175 million, with a mean of $9,373,840.
When comparing these numbers to those of the definitions provided by
Hodgetts and Kuratko (1995), all of the numbers met the criteria laid
out in the definitions. In other words, the four organizations with more
than 250 employees were not manufacturing firms, and the two
organizations that had very high profits were not in the retail,
wholesale or service sectors. These organizations were specialized manufacturing firms, selling components to other manufacturers.
Procedure
Surveys were sent to the owners of small businesses. If the owner
could not be identified, the surveys were mailed to the president of the
small business. A cover letter describing the study accompanied the
surveys. The cover letter indicated that participation was voluntary and
that responses would be kept confidential. Of the 2000 surveys mailed to
small businesses, 154 usable surveys were returned, resulting in a 7.7
percent response rate. While the response rate is low, enough data was
collected to allow for the effective analysis and development of scales
to measure organizational growth, planning, communication, trust and
human resource problems.
Measures
As part of a comprehensive survey, participants evaluated several
statements associated with their small business concerning firm growth,
planning, communication, trust and human resource problems. The complete
list of items being considered for each scale is presented in Appendix
1. The participants rated these items on 5-point scales, ranging from 1
(strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Analyses
Data were analyzed using SPSS 12.0 for Windows. First, correlation
coefficients were calculated to determine if any preliminary
relationships existed among the variables associated with each scale.
Second, factor analyses were conducted to determine if the items loaded
on the proposed scales. Factor analyses were conducted with growth and
planning, growth and communication, growth and trust, and growth and
human resource problems. This was done to ensure that none of the items
in the growth scale loaded with items in the scales proposed to
influence growth. Finally, reliability analysis was conducted for each
proposed scale based on the results of the factor analyses, in an
attempt to determine the reliability of the scales.
RESULTS
Table 1 presents the correlation coefficients for the scale items
associated with planning in small businesses. As the data indicate, all
of the items were significantly correlated with the other items proposed
to be in the planning scale.
Factor analyses were conducted on the growth scale items four
times, once each with the planning scales items, communication scale
items, trust scale items, and human resource problems items. In the
factor analysis with the planning items, two components were identified
when varimax rotation was used. The first component consisted of the
nine items proposed to comprise the planning scale, while the second
component consisted of the 6 items proposed to comprise the growth
scale. The factor loadings for each item within each scale were greater
than 0.40.
Given that the items on the planning scale were identified as
separate and distinct from the growth scale, a second factor analysis
was conducted with only the planning scale items to ensure that these
items loaded on one factor. The resulting analysis confirmed that only
one component existed for planning, with all factor loadings greater
than 0.60. Planning conducted had a factor loading of 0.72, formal
planning had a factor loading of 0.73, monitoring the progress of plans
had a factor loading of 0.80, and resources provided to ensure
achievement of plans had a factor loading of 0.72. Various types of
plans also were identified as components of the scale, with having
operational plans resulting in a factor loading of 0.70, and having
strategic plans and contingency plans having factor loadings of 0.79 and
0.69, respectively. Finally, ensuring that the parties involved in
achieving the plans resulted in a factor loading of 0.67 and linking
rewards to the plans had a factor loading of 0.61. When the reliability
analysis was conducted on this scale, the resulting Cronbach's
Alpha reliability coefficient was 0.88, indicating that the scale is
reliable.
The correlation coefficients for the items associated with the
communication scale items are presented in Table 2. The data indicate
that each of the items was significantly correlated with the other items
proposed to be in the communication scale.
A factor analysis was conducted which paired the growth scale items
with the communication scale items. Utilizing varimax rotation in the
factor analysis resulted in the identification of three components. The
first component was made up of five of the six growth scale items.
Specifically, growth over five years, growth in the number of employees
over five years, growth in sales over five years, growth in profits over
five years, and growth in market share over five years loaded on the
growth component, each with a factor loading greater than 0.70. Managers
communicating verbally with employees on a regular basis, meetings held
regularly, meeting being orderly, meeting being effective and meeting
being efficient each loaded on the communication component, and all
factor loadings were greater than 0.50. Finally, informing employees of
changes verbally and growth leveling off loaded on a third factor. This
indicates that these items are not components of the proposed
communication and growth scales, and were then removed from the scales.
Given that the communication items resulted in a reduction to five
items on the scale, an additional factor analysis was conducted to
ensure that only one component existed for the scale. The factor
analysis confirmed a single factor, with the resulting factor loadings
for each items greater than 0.60. Managers communicating with employees
verbally resulted in a factor loading of 0.67, while meeting being held
regularly had a factor loading of 0.71. Meeting being orderly, effective
and efficient resulted in factor loadings of 0.79, 0.81, and 0.77,
respectively. The subsequent reliability analysis indicated a
Cronbach's Alpha reliability coefficient of 0.79, indicating that
the scale is reliable.
The items proposed to comprise the scale on trust in small
businesses resulted in significant correlations. As the data in Table 3
indicate, all of the items were significantly correlated with the other
items proposed to be in the trust scale.
When the resulting five growth scale items were factor analyzed
with the trust scale items, two components were identified using varimax
rotation. The first factor consisted of the five growth scale items,
while the second factor consisted of the three trust scale items. All
factor loadings for the items associated with each scale was greater
than 0.70.
A second factor analysis was conducted on only the trust items to
ensure that these items loaded on just one component. One component
resulted, with businesses supporting managers and employees in the
decisions they make having a factor loading of 0.83. Businesses trusting
their employees and businesses trusting that their employees can step in
as needed resulted in factor loadings of 0.91 and 0.85, respectively.
The subsequent reliability analysis resulted in a Cronbach's Alpha
reliability coefficient of 0.83, indicating a scale that is reliable.
Table 4 presents the correlation coefficients for the scale items
associated with human resource problems in small businesses. As the data
indicate, all of the items were significantly correlated with the other
items proposed to be in the human resource problems scale.
A factor analysis was conducted analyzing the growth scale items
and the human resource problems scale items. Utilizing varimax rotation,
two components were identified. The first component consisted of the
growth scale items, while the second factor consisted of the human
resource problems scale items. All factor loadings were greater than
0.70.
To ensure that the human resource problems resulted in one
component, a subsequent factor analysis was conducted. A single
component was identified, with problems hiring the right person
resulting in a factor loading of 0.71, while problems hiring the right
number of employees having a factor loading of 0.86. Providing
appropriate salaries to employees and having enough people for the job
each resulted in factor loadings of 0.79 and 0.82, respectively. The
reliability analysis resulted in a Cronbach's Alpha reliability
coefficient of 0.81, indicating that the scale is reliable.
Table 5 presents the correlation coefficients for the scale items
associated with firm growth in small businesses. Only the remaining five
scale items were included in the analysis, as the sixth firm growth
scale item did not load on the proposed scale when the data was factor
analyzed with the communication scale items. As the data indicate, all
of the items were significantly correlated with the other items proposed
to be in the firm growth scale.
Finally, a factor analysis was conducted on only the remaining five
items proposed to comprise the growth scale. One component was
identified with growth over five years having a factor loading of 0.89
and growth in the number of employees over five years resulting in a
factor loading of 0.76. Growth in sales, profits and market share over
five years each resulted in factor loadings of 0.93, 0.73, and 0.77,
respectively. The reliability analysis indicated a reliable scale, with
a resulting Cronbach's Alpha of 0.87.
DISCUSSION
The results associated with the present study begin to reveal some
of the underlying concepts that comprise indicators of issues facing
small business. The study establishes scales that are intended to be
used to study small businesses as they grow, extending the research of
Howard (2001). These scales can be used to further the examination of
what the major issues are as a small business grows, as well as
potentially identifying when a small business should expand its
workforce.
The firm growth scale was found to be reliable, and focuses on
growth over a five year period, an increased number of employees,
increased sales, increased profits, increased market share, and
continued growth. Each of these items was included as growth in small
business, just like any business, can be measured in multiple ways. In
order to gain a full understanding of the total firm growth in a
business, taking into account market share, profits, sales and the
number of employees provides a more complete picture of the current
state of the small business, and is consistent with various models and
theories associated with firm growth (Flamholtz, 1990). The scale
developed not only incorporates each of these dimensions, but also
demonstrated a reliability of 0.87, which is a strong reliability.
Historically, only a small portion of small businesses have a
formal business plan (Bhide, 2000). However, this does not mean that
small businesses lack plans, just that the plans have not been
formalized. Evidence does indicate that small businesses rely on shared
business logic, ensuring that the small businesses can effectively move
forward without a formal, written business plan (Nicholls-Nixon, 2005).
Planning has been found to have an influence on the successful growth of
small businesses, focusing on looking toward the future (Barringer &
Greening, 1998; Greening et al., 1996; Gray, 1999). The planning scale
developed in the present study incorporates both formal and informal
planning, recognizing that not all plans in small businesses will be
formalized in a written format. Additionally, a variety of plans can
exist in organizations, such as strategic, operational and contingency
plans, which have also been incorporated into the scale in an attempt to
understand the extent of planning in small businesses. Monitoring
progress, resources to support a plan, employee understanding of the
plan and rewards associated with plan achievement have also been
included as items in the planning scale. By incorporating these items,
not only is the extent of planning in a small business examined, but the
also the actions and resources that can be used to ensure a plan's
success are considered, since these actions and resources can influence
the success of the plan. The inclusion of each of these items provides a
more complete view of not only the plans, but the organization's
intent to support the plans. The resulting reliability was strong, with
an alpha coefficient of 0.88.
Effective communication in a small business is of critical
importance, given that many small businesses do not have formalized
plans (Nicholls-Nixon, 2005). Most communication in small businesses is
verbal, and the communication scale incorporates items that focus on
verbal communication, as well as the effectiveness, efficiency and
orderliness of meetings where information is communicated to employees.
These items were specifically incorporated into the scale since
communication of organizational plans in meetings has been found to have
a positive, significant correlation with growth of organizational
profits (Howard, 2001). The communication scale resulted in a strong
reliability of 0.79.
Small business owners cannot always address all of the issues that
their small business faces themselves. Relying on employees to execute
their tasks and assignments is something that small business owners may
have to do at some point. This means that small business owners need to
trust their employees to do their assigned tasks, make solid decisions
that support organizational success, and that an employee can step in
where needed. Trust has not been studied often in small business
research, but has been found to have a significant, positive
relationship with organizational profits (Howard, 2001). The trust scale
incorporates supporting employees to do their job, trusting employees to
make decision, and trusting employees to step in and assist managers
when needed, achieving a strong reliability of 0.83.
Human resource problems are encountered by all types and sizes of
businesses, including small businesses. The predominant human resource
problems identified by Howard (2001), focused on hiring employees,
obtaining the right number of employees, having enough employees to
complete the jobs necessary to the organization, and having effective
compensation for employees. Each of these items was incorporated into
the human resource problems scale, resulting in a reliability
coefficient of 0.81, which is a strong reliability coefficient.
The present study focused on the development of scales that can be
used to examine small businesses to determine if the small business is
growing, as well as the status of planning, communication, trust and
human resource problems. In each instance, scales resulted that produced
strong reliabilities. These scales can begin to provide small business
researchers the opportunity to examine the status of small businesses
from an objective perspective, examining trends across small businesses
to determine how planning, communication, trust and human resource
problems might influence firm growth in small businesses. This can
assist in further understanding which factors lead to success and which
factors create challenges for small business.
Finally, continued refinement and examination of the scales might
provide researchers the opportunity to determine when a small business
should expand its workforce. While the items in the firm growth scale
indicate significant, positive correlations with each other, further
examination among these items might begin to unravel the mystery of when
it is the appropriate time to expand the workforce in the small
business. Is it after sales increase, or is it necessary to expand the
number of employees in order to increase sales? Perhaps it is a little
of both, and may be conditioned by the type of business one is in.
Regardless, the items can be further examined, knowing that there is a
relationship among them, to determine if causation can be determined in
addition to the correlation.
CONCLUSION
The present study extends prior research by establishing scales
that can be used to examine small businesses (Howard, 2001). Future
research should utilize these scales and focus on determining how
planning, communication, trust and human resource problems might
influence firm growth. Future research should also begin to attempt to
determine when a small business should increase the size of its
workforce, attempting to determine if a causal relationship exists
between the various items within the firm growth scale. By focusing
research on these two areas, valuable information will be gained,
further assisting the growth of a major engine in the U.S economy.
APPENDIX 1
Scale Items for Firm Growth, Planning, Communication, Trust and
Human Resource Problems
The following is the response scale that was presented to
participants. Following the response scale are the scales, with each
item listed.
Strongly Strongly
Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Agree
1 2 3 4 5
Firm Growth
GR1--The business has experienced considerable growth over the past
5 years.
GR2--The business has experienced considerable growth in the number
of employees over the past 5 years.
GR3--The business has experienced considerable growth in sales over
the past 5 years.
GR4--The business has experienced considerable growth in profits
over the past 5 years.
GR5--The business has experienced considerable growth in market
share over the past 5 years.
GR6--The business's growth has leveled off. (reverse coded for
analysis)
Planning
PL1--Planning is conducted in the business.
PL2--Planning in the business is formal (written).
PL3--Progress toward the plan's objectives are monitored by
the business.
PL4--Appropriate resources are provided to allow for the plans to
be accomplished.
PL5--Operational planning, meaning that planning on how the
day-to-day activities are to be conducted, is done in the
business.
PL6--Strategic planning, meaning that overall plans for the
organization for the next 3-5 years, is done in the business.
PL7--Contingency planning, meaning that plans are laid out
addressing situations as they arise, is conducted in the business.
PL8--The business ensures that all appropriate parties understand
the business's plans.
PL9--The business links rewards to the achievement of the
business's plans.
Communication
CM1--Employees are informed of changes in the organization
verbally.
CM2--Managers communicate verbally with employees on a regular
basis.
CM3--Meetings with managers and/or employees are held in the
business on a regular basis.
CM4--Meetings with managers and/or employees are orderly.
CM5--Meetings with managers and/or employees are effective.
CM6--Meetings with managers and/or employees are efficient.
Trust
TR1--The business supports managers and/or employees in the
decisions they make.
TR2--The business trusts employees to make decisions.
TR3--The business trusts that employees can step in and assist
managers when needed.
Human Resource Problems
PR1--Some problems in the business are associated with hiring the
right person.
PR2--Some problems in the business are associated with having the
right number of employees.
PR3--Some problems in the business are associated with appropriate
salaries for employees.
PR4--Some problems in the business are associated with having
enough people for the job.
REFERENCES
Barringer, B.R. & D.W. Greening (1998). Small business growth
through geographic expansion: A comparative case study. Journal of
Business Venturing, 13(6), 467-492.
Bhide, A.V. (2000). The origin and evolution of new businesses.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Box, T.M, H.L. Crouch & K.E. Clow (1998). Entrepreneurial performance in foreign settings: Analysis of personal, educational, and
experiential predictors. Proceedings of the Academy of Entrepreneurship,
4, 14-24.
Dyer, S.C. (1996). Public relations strategies for small business
growth. Public Relations Quarterly, 41(3), 43-46.
Flamholtz, E.C. (1990). Growing pains. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Greening, D.W., B.R. Barringer & G. Macy (1996). A qualitative
study of managerial challenges facing small business geographic
expansion. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(4), 233-256.
Gray, J.H. (1999). A predictive model of small business success.
Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 5(2), 25-36.
Hodgetts, R.M., & D.F. Kuratko (1995). Effective small business
management (Fifth Edition). Fort Worth: Dryden Press.
Howard, J.L. (2001). Human resource management issues as a small
business grows. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 51-63.
Kotey, B., & P. Slade (2005). Formal human resource management
practices in small growing firms. Journal of Small Business Management,
43(1), 16-40.
Nicholls-Nixon, C.L. (2005). Rapid growth and high performance: The
entrepreneur's "impossible dream?" Academy of Management
Executive, 19(1), 77-89.
Morrison, A., J. Breen & S. Ali (2003). Small business growth:
Intention, ability, and opportunity. Journal of Small Business
Management, 41(4), 417-425.
Scarborough, N.M., & T.W. Zimmerer (2003). Effective small
business management: An entrepreneurial approach (Seventh Edition.).
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Tucci, J.E., D. Wyld & S.D. Cappel (1997). Employment and
compensation: Factors of consideration for the entrepreneur. Proceedings
of the Academy of Entrepreneurship, 3, 56-58.
AUTHOR NOTES
Jack L. Howard is a Professor of Human Resource Management at
Illinois State University, where he teaches courses on labor relations,
human resource management and human resource management for small
business. His research interests include employee rights and human
resource management for small business. The author would like to thank
Joshua Morgan for survey administration and Lucas Helmer for data entry.
The author would also like to thank John Lust for his helpful comments
on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
Jack L. Howard, Illinois State University
Table 1: Correlation Matrix of the Planning Scale Items
Variable PL1 PL2 PL3 PL4
PL1
PL2 .53 **
PL3 .64 ** .63 **
PL4 .38 ** .48 ** .53 **
PL5 .43 ** .40 ** .43 ** .43 **
PL6 .46 ** .51 ** .62 ** .50 **
PL7 .39 ** .30 ** .42 ** .46 **
PL8 .37 ** .37 ** .42 ** .43 **
PL9 .36 ** .36 ** .31 ** .41 **
Variable PL5 PL6 PL7 PL8
PL1
PL2
PL3
PL4
PL5
PL6 .48 **
PL7 .51 ** .57 **
PL8 .40 ** .43 ** .41 **
PL9 .41 ** .35 ** .35 ** .49 **
Note: Diagonals are omitted. ** p < .01
Table 2: Correlation Matrix of the Communication Scale Items
Variable CM1 CM2 CM3 CM4 CM5
CM1
CM2 .47 **
CM3 .19 * .40 **
CM4 .20 ** .40 ** .52 **
CM5 .26 ** .39 ** .44 ** .54 **
CM6 .28 ** .42 ** .34 ** .47 ** .62 **
Note: Diagonals are omitted. * p < .05. ** p < .01
Table 3: Correlation Matrix of the Trust Scale Items
Variable TR1 TR2
TR1
TR2 .65 **
TR3 .52 ** .68 **
Note: Diagonals are omitted. ** p < .01
Table 4: Correlation Matrix of the Human Resource Problems Scale Items
Variable PR1 PR2 PR3
PR1
PR2 .52 **
PR3 .44 ** .54 **
PR4 .38 ** .65 ** .55 **
Note: Diagonals are omitted. ** p < .01
Table 5: Correlation Matrix of the Firm Growth Scale Items
Variable GR1 GR2 GR3 GR4
GR1
GR2 .57 **
GR3 .86 ** .65 **
GR4 .57 ** .41 ** .62 **
GR5 .58 ** .52 ** .64 ** .43 **
Note: Diagonals are omitted. ** p < .01