Single mothers--how are they doing?
Hill, Kathy L.
INTRODUCTION
Since the 1950's, traditional families have become
increasingly rare with a boost in other types of family structures,
specifically single parent households headed by women. For the past two
decades, the number of single mothers has been increasing. These single
parents are faced with economic and social obstacles as they try to care
for their families.
From 1993 to 2003, the number of single mothers increased to
approximately 77%. In 1993 the average number of single parents was 7.7
million compared to 13.7 million single parents in 2007 and
approximately 84% of those parents were mothers. Single working mothers
ages 55 to 64 total 31% and ages 15-24 total 4%. Single mothers are
spread among all economic levels, ages, races, education, employment,
and occupations (Grall, 2009).
From 1960 to 2007, the percentage of American women who were
married fell from 66% to 51%, the percentage of men who were married
fell from 69% to 55%, and the number of cohabiting couples increased
from 439,000 to more than 6.4 million. Because of the increase in
cohabitation, about 40% of American children spend some time in a
cohabiting union; 20% of babies are born to cohabiting couples, and the
vast majority of the children born to cohabiting couples see their
parents break up by the time they turn 15 (Wilcox, 2009).
From an emotional and social perspective, about 20% of divorced
adults find their lives enhanced and another 50% seem to suffer no
long-term ill effects. Yet, men and/or women can be caught in a downward
emotional spiral, experience difficulties at work, and go through
serious deteriorations in their relationships with their children.
Because of the divorce, many will lose their homes, a substantial share
of their monthly incomes, and regular contact with their children
(Hetherington & Kelly, 2007).
Educators, lawmakers, and religious leaders continually express
their concerns regarding the erosion and possible extinction of the
traditional family (Moss, 2009). What=s more alarming are the potential
debilitating effects broken families have on children and their
development. Wilcox (2009) argues that the children of divorced parents
are two to three times more likely to suffer from serious social or
psychological problems than children from intact marriages. McLanahan
and Sandefur (1994) found that 31% of adolescents with divorced parents
dropped out of high school, compared to 13% of children from intact
families; that 33% of adolescent girls from divorced families became
teen mothers, compared to 11% from parents who were continuously
married; and that 11% of boys from divorced families end up spending
time in prison before the age of 32, compared to 5% of boys who come
from intact homes. The consequences for children are immense. Some of
these consequences include: 750,000 children have to repeat grades; 1.2
million school children are suspended; approximately 500,000 acts of
teenage delinquency are committed; 600,000 kids receive therapy; and
approximately 70,000 kids commit suicide every year (Amato, Booth,
Johnson & Rogers, 2007). Many children=s lives would improve
significantly if the family-stability clock could be turned back just a
few decades (Amato, et al, 2007).
When children are exposed to high levels of conflict at home, they
seem to do better when their parents separate, but most divorces do not
involve high levels of conflict; therefore, the clear majority of
divorces involving children in America are not in the best interests of
the children (Amato et al, 2007).
Research also indicates that remarriage is no salve for children
wounded by divorce. AChildren whose parents have remarried do not have
higher levels of well-being than children in lone-parent families
(Cherlin, 2009, p 5). Remarriage generally requires a move and more
adjustment for children who thrive on stability (Cherlin, 2009).
Many studies have been completed about children and their
unfavorable behaviors because of being raised in single parent
households. One research study concluded that children do worse when
raised by single parents--specifically low-income single mothers
(Hofferth, Smith, McLoyd, & Finkelstein, 2000). Given their low
wages, below average education, and harsh environment, many single
mothers look to the government for help. In turn, social programs are
instituted in hopes of improving the plight of single parents and the
general welfare of their children.
It is often said that it is difficult enough for two parents to
raise a child, let alone one parent. When that single parent depends
only on a high school diploma to obtain employment and care for a family
of two or more, it makes staying above the poverty line difficult if not
impossible. However, with a college education to elevate wages, raising
a child becomes more economically feasible. Results from a Brown
University study showed that single mothers, compared with married
mothers, reported substantially lower incomes, higher rates of childhood
abuse and more psychiatric disorders (Hofferth, et al., 2000). These
issues undoubtedly affect child development and behavior. Therefore, it
is essential to gain insight into understanding and improving the
position of single mothers in the workforce today.
The purpose of this study was to discuss economic and social
factors that affect low-income single mothers and their children.
Economic factors such as sometimes-severe financial hardships, the
cognitive development of their children, poverty-level living
conditions, and quality child care which affects labor force
participation were assessed. Social issues such as receiving little or
no support from fathers, children's behavioral problems, and
society's misconceptions about single mothers were examined in the
related literature.
ECONOMIC FACTORS
For the past two decades, single parent families have escalated
while traditional two parent families have been on the decline. For
married-couple families, both the poverty rate and the number in poverty
increased from 4.9 percent (2.8 million) in 2007 to 5.5 percent (3.3
million) in 2008. The poverty rate and the number in poverty showed no
statistical change in 2008 for
female-householder-with-no-husband-present families (28.7 percent and
4.2 million) and for male-householder-no wife-present families (13.8
percent and 723,000) (US Census Bureau, 2008). These living situations
make it difficult for families to remain healthy and in tact.
Many research studies have been conducted in the area of single
mothers. One such study, lead by Aurora P. Jackson in 2000, demonstrated
how economic hardships influenced parental psychological functioning and
family relationships (Jackson, Brooks-Gunn, Huang, & Glassman,
2000). For example, her study showed that financial strain lead to
depressive symptoms. In turn, those depressive symptoms disrupted
effective parenting skills and, subsequently, children's behavior.
The mothers tested in Jackson's study experienced several factors
associated with economic hardships little or no monetary support from
fathers, low wage jobs, and no education beyond high school (Jackson et
al., 2000). These risks contributed to the mother's level of
financial strain. Single mothers have a higher level of financial strain
because, basically, they are the sole caretaker and the only source of
income; therefore, depression is the result. Depression is a
psychological function that is a direct result of financial strain. As
economic hardships influence single mothers psychological functioning,
these difficulties become predictors for single mother's
children's cognitive and social development (Jackson et al., 2000).
Financial strain was shown in Jackson's study to have adverse
effects on children's development. For example, preschoolers
displayed learning disabilities in addition to other behavioral problems
(Jackson et al., 2000). To confer with Jackson's evidence,
University of Michigan research scientist Sandra Hofferth et al (2000)
argued that low-income parents simply do not have enough money to invest
in books, educational activities, toys, and other advantages that
require financial resources. The result is that their children's
cognitive skills are lower, leading to lower levels of completed school;
therefore, their children's achievement level correlated with their
income level. The lower the household income, the lower the achievement
levels for those children. Robert Rector (2001), Heritage Foundation
Policy Analyst, gave congressional testimony that supported
Jackson's claim. In his research, he found that single parenthood
had significant deleterious consequences on children's development,
which impeded their ability to become successful members of mainstream
society (Rector, 2001). These harmful effects were more prevalent for
males with female head of householders than female children.
Jackson's et al (2000) study showed that problematic behaviors are
dependent upon a child's gender. The mother's depressive
symptoms contribute to the child's behavioral problems as well,
which in turn hinder family relationships from strengthening (Jackson et
al., 2000).
As noted earlier in Jackson's study (Jackson et al., 2000),
depression was caused by economic hardships. University of Kansas
Assistant Professor Sondra G. Beverly (2001) acknowledged that economic
hardships were most prevalent among single mothers even when the economy
is booming (Beverly, 2001). She also pointed out that low-income single
mothers live and cope with sometimes-severe economic hardships daily.
A second study by Peter D. Brandon and Gene A. Fisher (2001) stated
that insufficient income as a family stressor could affect the quality
of care given to children. In addition, evidence exists to suggest that
insufficient child care options could be a strong barrier to labor force
participation and more of an employment barrier for public-housing
residents and single parents (Kimmel, 1998). Author Elisabeth Porter
(2001) of The Journal of Gender Studies, stated that poverty is due to
women's lack of earning power, inadequate job skills, and scanty
access to decent childcare. Thus, women are better off on welfare than
in low-paying jobs (Porter, 2001). In contrast, Washington Post
columnist Dan Froomkin (1998) wrote that economic hardships were not an
excuse for people to live off government checks or for them to avoid
unemployment. In a study conducted by Alexis J. Walker (2000),
Aemployed@ mothers actually found it more difficult to meet their
everyday expenses. Because of expenses incurred because they had jobs,
single mothers had little or no time to take on additional jobs (Walker,
2000). Many single mothers find themselves in a Catch-22 situation.
Author Mulroy found that many single mothers want to work and not
be dependent on the government for help, but society sends them mixed
messages: middle class women should stay at home with their children,
but poor women should leave their children and go to work
(Lockwood-Rayermann, 2000). Because of the imbalance of working mothers
and stay-at-home mothers, single mothers often experience role strain
from attempting to balance being a wage earner and having parental
responsibilities (Kerka, 1988). An emotional struggle ensues between
being a good parent and being a good, although, employed parent.
Researchers Jo Anne Youngblut, et al., (2000) added that media
stereotyping suggested that single mothers often engage in behaviors to
avoid employment. In addition, Froomkin (1998) wrote that government
assistance was responsible for a permanent underclass of people who had
absolutely no incentive to seek employment. However, in contrast to
Froomkin's claim, LaShunda Hall, government assistance recipient,
proved critics wrong when she successfully completed Wisconsin Works
Program (Hall, 2001).
LaShunda Hall (2001), single mother of two, gave congressional
testimony about her entrance into mainstream society. Once faced with
continuous economic hardships, this single mother was able to overcome
barriers and become self-sufficient. She participated in the Temporary
Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) funded program, Wisconsin Works.
Hall was provided counseling and a case manager. These two people
enabled Hall to get her GED and to enroll in a four-year college,
happily pursuing a Bachelor's of Science degree in Criminal Justice
(Hall, 2001). Single mothers have the daunting task of providing for
their families with only one source of income. This places an incredible
strain on the emotional welfare of the child as well as the parent.
Furthermore, single parents have to be watchful of how economics can
affect their children and adopt ways of making financial strain more
tolerable.
A study by researcher Linda McCreary (2000) stated that
communication was a behavior associated with effective families and that
this trait carried forward throughout adulthood. Effective family
structure leads to well-behaved children at home as well as at school
(Hofferth, et al., 2000). Additionally, single parents that participate
in school activities help raise their children's achievement level,
and it also strengthens the parent child bond (Sanson, 2001).
SOCIAL FACTORS
The emergence of the divorce and marriage dichotomy in America
creates a host of other social problems. The breakdown of marriage in
working-class and poor communities has played a major role in fueling
poverty and inequality. Isabel Sawhill, a nationally known budget expert
who focuses on domestic poverty and federal fiscal policy at the Center
on Children and Families at the Brookings Institution, has concluded
that virtually all of the increase in child poverty in the United States
since the 1970's can be attributed to family breakdown (Wilcox,
2009).
In addition to financial strain, single mothers are tested by their
children's behavior or lack thereof. To make matters worse, single
mothers are raising their children without support from their
children's fathers. Many fathers have chosen not to be an active
part of their children's lives. This decision has hardened the
hearts of many single mothers.
Numerous children under the age of 18 will grow up without having
their biological father or a father figure in their lives. Author Nancy
Darling (1999) stated that uninvolved parenting could have detrimental
effects on childhood development and could continue throughout
adolescence and pre-adulthood (Darling, 1999).
Single mothers are faced with the dilemma of having the dual role
of being sole family breadwinner and the sole resident care giving
parent (Lockwood-Rayermann, 2000). When fathers are not around to share
the child care, the full responsibility falls to the mother, increasing
her sense of overwhelming obligation (Youngblut, et al., 2000).
Most children want their fathers involved in their lives. The
amount of interaction between fathers and their children is very
important. Children need their fathers in order to form a stronger
definition of self.
Growing up in female-headed households can produce children that
have difficulty adjusting in school and society (Jackson et al., 2000
& McCreary, 2000). Family structure plays a significant part in
adolescents' grades and attendance according to some research
findings. They found that adolescents from intact homes perform better
academically and maintain better school attendance than do those
students from either single-parent or remarried homes (Ham, 2004).
There have been conflicting studies showing whether children of
single parents experience more behavioral problems than those growing up
in two-parent households. Single parents and their children live in a
society that views their families as >broken,= >abnormal,=
>deviant,= and >doomed to fail=@ (Rhodes, 2000). Single mother is
a phrase that conjures up poor, lazy individuals unwilling to be
self-sufficient, and society should be especially wary of her children
because they will never amount to anything.
Children are stigmatized and stereotyped by society because of the
status of their mothers and society's perception of them. Author
Carolyn Rogers (2001) wrote that children in single parent families tend
to face more disadvantages than children in two-parent families. She
added that single parent children might receive less attention and care
from their parents. Additionally, these children tend to have more
school related health and behavioral problems which could lead to
completing fewer years of schooling (Rogers, 2001).
Cornell University Professor Henry Ricciuti (1999) conducted a
study that focused on 1,700 six- and seven-year old children residing in
single mother households. He found that potentially adverse behavior of
single parent children might not surface until later in childhood
(Ricciuti, 1999). It is possible for children to perform and behave very
well in school during the early years. However, as they grow and
develop, conditions exist for them to react adversely to their home
life-especially if that home life is filled with strife and instability.
For example, before LaShunda Hall (2001) turned her life around, she was
fiercely painting a path of destruction. She is an example of how
economic and social issues can adversely affect the children of single
parent--especially single mothers. Professor Ricciuti (1999) suggested
that steps be taken when children are young before possible harmful
effects of single parenthood emerge. These battles add to the war single
mothers fight every day.
Behavioral problems and absent fathers add to single mothers'
burdens. Additionally, single mothers must cope with some of
society's negative perception of them. They have to cope with
depression, low self-esteem, and the myths that society has generated
about them and their children (Van Horn, 1999). With unlimited barriers,
many single mothers still manage to persevere as in the case of LaShunda
Hall (2001). Single parents must have the fortitude to endure the
difficulty of raising children alone.
SUMMARY
The purpose of this study was to discuss economic and social
factors that affect low-income single mothers and their children. The
first objective of this study was to discuss economic factors that
affect low-income single mothers and their children. Researcher Jackson
et al (2000) identified financial strain as a precursor to depression.
Once depressive symptoms emerged, single mothers exhibited ineffective
and potentially harmful parenting skills (Jackson et al., 2000).
Additionally, economic hardships were magnified when single mothers had
to contend with little or no monetary support from fathers and low
paying jobs (Jackson et al., 2000). These issues disrupted single
mothers' children=s cognitive and social development (Jackson et
al., 2000).
Research scientist Hofferth, et al (2000) argued that low-income
single parents do not have the resources to provide educational tools
necessary for their children=s development. Inadequate supply of
financial resources leads to children completing only lower levels of
school (Hofferth, et al., 2000). Financial strain was shown to have
unhealthy effects on single mothers and especially on their children.
Researchers Brandon and Fisher (2001) stated that insufficient
income affected the quality of care given to children. Kimmel (1998)
added that single mothers often find insufficient income as a barrier to
employment.
Researcher Walker (2000) found in her study that many working
single mothers had difficulties meeting everyday expensesBexpenses they
would not have if they were unemployed. Author Mulroy found that single
mothers often find themselves in a quandary: They can=t afford to work.
This state of perplexity propels single mothers to indulge in stress
relievers (Lockwood-Rayermann, 2000).
The second objective of this study was to discuss social factors
that affect low-income single mothers and their children. Absent
fathers, below-level status, and possible behavioral problems were some
social issues discussed. Columnist Wade Horn (1998) suggested that
absent or non-involved fathers could have a detrimental effect on
children. In addition, Ricciuti (1999) found that possible adverse
behaviors might not surface until later in childhood.
Children of single parents often have behavioral problems (Jackson
et al., 2000). Single parents, whether mothers or fathers, have a
difficult time raising their children to be healthy, well-adjusted,
respectful, and successful adults. Coupled with economic hardships and
social issues, single parents, mothers or fathers, often find themselves
at the end of their rope. However, many single parents find the support
and guidance needed to overcome their present situations.
REFERENCES
Amato, P. R., Booth, A., Johnson, D. R., & Rogers, S. J.
(2007). Alone together: How marriage in America is changing. Boston,
Mass: Harvard University Press.
Beverly, S. G. (2001, September). Material hardship in the United
States: Evidence from the survey of income and program participation.
Social Work Research, 25(3), 143. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier
Database.
Brandon, P. D. & Fisher, G. A. (2001, March). The dissolution
of joint living arrangements among single parents and children: Does
welfare make a difference? Social Science Quarterly, 82(1), 1+.
Retrieved from EBSCO database.
Cherlin, A. J. (2009). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage
and the family in America today. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
Darling, N. (1999). Parenting style and its correlates (ERIC
Document Reproduction Service No. ED 427896). Washington, DC: U.S.
Government Printing Office.
Feinman, J. (2001). Church attendance, family structure, parenting
style and antisocial behavior of Black and Latino urban adolescents.
Dissertation Abstracts Online, 63(03B), 1615.
Froomkin, D. (1998, July 23). Welfare=s changing face. Washington
Post. Retrieved from http://washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/ special/
welfare/welfare/htm.
Grall, T. (2009, November). Custodial mothers and fathers and their
child support: 2007. Current Population Reports. Retrieved from
http://www.census.gov/prod/2009pubs/p60-237.pdf
Hall, L. (2001, October). Changes in the wel fare system. Retrieved
from http://edworkforce.house.gov/hearings/107th/21st/welfare
101601/hall.htm.
Ham, B. D. (2004). The effects of divorce and remarriage on the
academic achievement of high school seniors. Journal of Divorce &
Remarriage, 42, 159-179.
Hetherinton, E. M, & Kelly, J. (2002). For better or for worse:
Divorce reconsidered. New York, New York: W. W. Norton & Company,
Inc.
Hofferth, S. L., Smith, J., McLoyd, V. C., & Finkelstein, J.
(2000). Achievement and behavior among children of welfare recipients,
welfare leavers, and low-income single mothers. (Statistical Data
Included). Journal of Social Issues, 56(4), 747-774.
Horn, W. F. (1998, November).There is no substitute for parents.USA
Today (Society for the Advancement of Education). Retrieved from
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1272/is_ 1998_Nov/ai_54879234/
Jackson, A.P., Brooks-Gunn, J. Huang, C., & Glassman, M. (2000,
October). Single mothers in low-wage jobs: Financial strain, parenting,
and preschoolers= outcomes. Child Development, 71(5), 1409-1423.
Retrieved from EBSCO database.
Kerka, S. (1988, January). Single parents: Career-related issues
and needs. ERIC Digests, 75. Retrieved from ERIC database.
Kirby, J. (n.d.). Single-parent families in poverty. Retrieved from
http://www.hec.ohio-state.edu/ famlife/bulletin/volume.1/bullart1.htm.
Kimmel, J. (1998). Child care costs as a barrier to employment for
single and married mothers. The Review of Economics and Statistics.
Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database.
Lockwood-Rayermann, S. (2000). The new uprooted: Single mothers in
urban life (Book Review). Journal of Urban Affairs, 22(3), 356.
Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database.
McLanahan, S. & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single
parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University
Press.
McCreary, L. L. (2000). Components of family functioning in
low-income African American single-parent families of young children.
Dissertations Abstracts Online, 61(07B), 3509.
Moss, J. (2009, March 8). The erosion of civilization=s foundation.
Associated Content. Retrieved from
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1545453/
the_erosion_of_civilizationsfoundation_pg2.html?cat=9
Porter, E. (2001, March). Interdependence, parenting, and
responsible citizenship. Journal of Gender Studies, 10(1), 5. Retrieved
from Academic Search Premier Database.
Rector, R. (2001, March). Welfare overhaul effects. FDCH
Congressional Testimony. House Ways and Means Committee. Retrieved from
Academic Search Premier Database.
Rhodes, R. & Johnson M. N. (2000, Fall). Students= perception
of single parents and social justice: A women=s issue. Journal of Women
and Social Work, 15(3), 434. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier
Database.
Ricciuti, H. N. (1999). Single parenthood and school readiness in
White, Black, and Hispanic 6- and 7-year-olds. Journal of Family
Psychology, 13(3), 450-465.
Rogers, C. (2001, May August). A look at America=s children and
their families. Food Review, 24(2), 2. Retrieved from Academic Search
Premier Database.
Sanson, A. & Lewis, V. (2001, Winter). Children and their
family contexts. Australian Institute of Family Studies, Family Matters,
59. Retrieved from http://www.aifs.gov.au/institute/pubs/fm2001/fm59/as.pdf
US Census Bureau. (2008). Income, poverty and health insurance
Coverage in the United States: 2008. 2009 Current Population Survey
(CPS) Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC). Retrieved from
http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/p60_236sa.pdf.
Van Horn, J. (1999, January). Coping as a single parent-overview.
Retrieved from http://www.penpages.psu.edu/ penpages_reference/ 28507/
2850780.html.
Walker, A. J. (2000, August). Refracted knowledge: Viewing families
through the prism of social science. Journal of Marriage and Family,
62(3), 595. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier Database.
Wilcox, W. B. (2009). The evolution of divorce. National Affairs.
Retrieved from www.nationalaffairs.com.
WomenWork. (2005). The national network for women=s employment.
Retrieved from http://www.womenwork.org/pdfresources/chutes-ladders_recs.pdf
Wurzel, B. J. (n.d.). Growing up in single parent families.
Retrieved from http://ohioline.osu.edu/hyg-fact/5000/5291.html.
Youngblut, J. M., Brady, N. R., Brooten, D., & Thomas, D. J.
(2000, March). Factors influencing single mother=s employment status.
Health Care for Women International, 21(2), 125. Retrieved from Academic
Search Premier Database.
Kathy L. Hill, Sam Houston State University