Columbia: Space Shuttle Disaster (2008).
Van Riper, A. Bowdoin
Columbia: Space Shuttle Disaster (2008)
Written and directed by Gilles Cayette, Produced by Frank Eskenazi
for Nova
Distributed by PBS
www.pbs.org
54 minutes
No flight that takes its crew from zero to Mach 24 in a matter of
minutes can truly be called "routine," but STS-107--the 107th
mission of the space shuttle program, flown in late January 2003--came
close. Like dozens of shuttle missions before it, STS-107 was devoted
entirely to science. As mission commander Rick Husband and pilot Willie
McCool monitored Columbia's around-the-world in-90-minutes orbit,
the other five members of the crew carried out eighty different
experiments in the laboratory modules bolted into its payload bay. There
would be no spacewalks, no docking with the International Space Station,
and no need for the fifty-foot robot arm, which had been left behind to
save weight. Even the chunks of insulating foam shed by the she external
fuel tank at liftoff seemed (at the time) routine. Every shuttle flight
had suffered "foam loss" at launch and returned to Earth with
small dings and gouges in the tiles of its heat shield.
Sixteen minutes before its scheduled landing in Florida, as
Columbia streaked through the Earth's atmosphere over New Mexico,
things began to go terribly wrong. Air, heated to 1600 degrees Celsius
by the friction of reentry, penetrated the leading edge of the left wing
where a two-pound block of insulating foam had struck, and cracked, the
carbon-fiber heat shield. Columbia's slow death was foretold by
failing sensors, marked by the loss of all communication, and confirmed
by observers in Texas who watched a cloud of debris trail flame across
the sky. Flight director Leroy Cain quietly told his team at Mission
Control: "Lock the doors ... no calls outside this room ... prepare
to preserve your data."
The Columbia disaster seemingly has less to offer a would-be
filmmaker than the Challenger disaster seventeen years earlier. There is
no close-up footage of the shuttle's final moments, no dramatic
late-night argument over whether or not to launch, and no obvious figure
(like teacher-in-space Christa McAuliffe on Challenger) for viewers to
identify with. Columbia: Space Shuttle Disaster, an installment in the
long-running PBS science series Nova, turns these challenges into
advantages. It makes no effort to profile the seven members of the crew
(preferring to make Columbia its principal "character") and
resists the tendency to show the accident itself over and over. Instead,
it devotes most of its running time to setting the disaster firmly in
context. Relying heavily on interviews with expert commentators, it
shows how Columbia and her crew fell victim to a combination of bad
design decisions made at the dawn of the shuttle program, NASA's
privileging of flight schedules over safety, and senior managers'
hobbling of their own engineers' efforts to assess the severity of
the foam strike.
An interview-driven film about the causes of a disaster could, if
handled badly, be deadly dull, but Columbia: Space Shuttle Disaster is
nothing of the kind. The onscreen commentators are an all-star cast of
experts on the shuttle program and eyewitnesses to the disaster. Roger
Launius, senior curator at the National Air and Space Museum, explains
the design compromises that resulted from the shuttle program's
troubled early history. Story Musgrave, veteran of six shuttle flights,
describes what it feels like to go from ground to orbit in eight
minutes, "shaking so hard you think you're going to lose your
teeth." CBS News reporter Bill Harwood recalls the text message
that--as he waited for Columbia to land at Kennedy Space
Center--confirmed the worst. Nobel-Prize-winning physicist Douglas
Osterhoff, a member of the commission that investigated the disaster,
explains how a two-pound piece of plastic foam could knock a hole in the
leading edge of Columbia's wing: a theory so counter-intuitive that
senior NASA engineers initially refused to believe it. Rodney Rocha and
Scott Hubbard, two of the engineers who did suspect that a "foam
strike" might have fatally damaged the shuttle, speak at length in
the film. So do flight director Leroy Cain, former NASA head Sean
O'Keefe, and (in onboard video footage that, astonishingly,
survived the accident) the crew of the Columbia itself.
The film's only serious weak spot is due to an accident of
timing. Released in 2008, it devotes much of its final segment to
Project Constellation: the Bush-administration initiative to develop the
technological building blocks--a family of disposable boosters, and an
enlarged 4-6 person Apollo-style "capsule" called Orion for
missions to the Moon and, eventually, Mars. After severe cutbacks (and
near-cancellation) by the Obama administration in 2010, however, the
future of the project is murky at best. Orion has been hailed (by NASA
and the filmmakers) as the future of manned spaceflight: a better, safer
alternative to the shuttle. Whether it will be given the opportunity to
make good on those promises remains to be seen.
A. Bowdoin Van Riper
Southern Polytechnic State University