Percy Julian: Forgotten Genius.
Van Riper, A. Bowdoin
Percy Julian: Forgotten Genius (2007)
Written and Produced by Llewellyn M. Smith and Stephen Lyons.
Directed by Llewellyn M. Smith.
WGBH/Boston Video
www.wgbh.org
112 minutes
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Dr. Percy L. Julian was one of the leading American chemists of the
twentieth century. His elegant solutions to the problems of synthesizing
complex organic molecules won him international acclaim. He was an
acclaimed lecturer, a tireless builder of institutions, and a mentor
with dozens of successful students to his credit. His work in industry
was central to the development of latex paint, soy-based plastics,
synthetic hormones, and dozens of food products. His 1935 synthesis of
the anti-glaucoma drug physostigmine--a critical step in the treatment
of the disease--was cited by the American Chemical Society as one of the
landmark achievements in American chemistry. He was instrumental, in the
early 1950s, in the development of synthetic cortisone, which freed
millions from the half-frozen joints and excruciating pain of rheumatoid
arthritis. Julian accomplished all this despite having to scramble,
throughout his professional life, for funding, for facilities, and for
employment. He never held a professorship at a major research
university, never worked for a major chemical or pharmaceutical company,
and was marginalized, again and again, by other chemists. Even his
election to the National Academy of Sciences--after decades of work that
might have won him the Nobel Prize--faced intense, vocal opposition. The
reason was depressingly simple: Percy Julian was black.
Born in 1899 and raised in Alabama at the height of the Jim Crow
era, Percy Julian possessed two qualities common in great scientists:
superhuman determination and towering ambition. The former brought him
success not only as a scientist but as a businessman (Julian
Laboratories, founded in the mid-1950s, made him a millionaire) and
humanitarian (he backed, and helped to bankroll, the civil rights
movement). The latter, though it contributed to his success, also made
him painfully aware of opportunities lost, and doors closed, to him
because of the color of his skin. Family members, colleagues, and Julian
himself saw his story as one of great talent squandered by a society too
blind to recognize it.
It is one of the glories of Percy Julian: Forgotten Genius that it
resists the urge to turn this proud, driven, complex man into a plaster
saint. It emphasizes Julian's determination and hard work--arriving
at DePauw University with a shaky tenth-grade education, he went on to
graduate first in his class and win election to Phi Beta Kappa--without
ever making him just an earnest striver. It illuminates his genius
without downplaying the role that fortuitous accidents and rival
chemists' blunders played in his success. It presents him as a man
on the make--a scientific entrepreneur always on the lookout for the
next great research problem, commercial application, or funding
source--while making a strong case that such talents were central to his
success. The film also avoids the simplistic, celebratory "X
invented Y" style of narrative that plagues many earnest attempts
to write black scientists and inventors back into the historical record.
It shows how Julian's discoveries emerged not from isolated flashes
of genius bur from a carefully constructed research program grounded in
his deep knowledge of both chemistry and industrial processes.
Percy Julian: Forgotten Genius takes viewers deep into intellectual
territory that all but a handful will find unfamiliar: industrial
organic chemistry. It does so with extraordinary skill, using simple
animations, reconstructed experiments, and commentary by
"talking-head" chemists to explain how complex organic
molecules are manufactured on an industrial scale. It also provides
context, deftly sketching the history of the American chemical industry,
the jubilation that greeted the first successful tests of cortisone in
1949, and the entrenched racism that blacks faced in northern cities
(like Julian's adopted hometown of Chicago) after World War II. The
contextual sections of the film are so strong that they could be used in
courses on social history, business history, or the history of science.
Nova's superb production values prevail throughout the
two-hour film. The reenactments of critical experiments are especially
well-handled, with Ruben Santiago-Hudson giving a riveting performance
as Julian. Another, less familiar type of reenactment is threaded
throughout the film: Julian telling the story of his life in an
after-dinner speech before a small but appreciative audience. In his
narration (the words are presumably drawn from his unfinished
autobiography) Julian moves from success to success. The film's
narration tells a darker story, beset with frustrations, reversals, and
complications. It thus quietly challenges Julian's slick Horatio
Alger narrative, and (by extension) all such narratives. In place of
such slickness, it offers complexity, nuance, and a model of how to tell
the life story of a great scientist.
A. Bowdoin Van Riper
Southern Polytechnic State University