New directions for research on SME-eBusiness: insights from an analysis of journal articles from 2003 to 2006.
Parker, Craig M. ; Castleman, Tanya
Abstract
Previous research which consolidates the growing body of academic
literature on small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and electronic
business (eBusiness) has taken the form of meta-analyses which focus on
analysing adoption factors, pre-2000 articles and a small number of
journals. This paper makes a valuable contribution to the analysis of
SME-eBusiness research by addressing the limitations of past literature
analyses because it presents an extensive literature review of 120
SME-eBusiness journal articles published between 2003 and 2006 in 53
journals. This paper is unique, when compared to meta-analyses of
adoption factors, because it analyses the SME-eBusiness literature
broadly on the basis of the data collection approaches used, countries
and eBusiness technologies studied, and the primary research objective
of each article. This approach to the analysis revealed a number of
limitations in the existing research such as the tendency: to treat SMEs
and eBusiness applications homogeneously rather than as highly diverse,
complex entities; to repeat adoption factor studies which have now
reached saturation point; and to focus on SMEs themselves without
considering the complexity of relationships which many SMEs have with
family, friends, other businesses and eBusiness solution providers.
These limitations highlight the need for new research directions which
move beyond identifying and evaluating adoption factors. The paper
concludes by outlining a number of broad research directions which might
help overcome the limitations with the existing body of SME-eBusiness
research.
Keywords
Small and medium enterprises; SMEs; electronic business; adoption;
internet; web; literature review.
Earlier version
A shorter, earlier version of this paper appeared in the 2006
CollECTeR Conference on Electronic Commerce, Adelaide, Australia, 9
December. This earlier version, however, only analysed 100 journal
articles.
1 Introduction
Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and their adoption and use of
various forms of electronic business (eBusiness) have been the subject
of considerable research, especially over the last decade with the
commercialisation of the Internet. Our extensive search of the
literature identified at least 120 journal articles published between
2003 and 2006 with a focus on SMEs and eBusiness. Many looked at
Internet or website adoption and use in particular. It is therefore an
opportune time to conduct an analysis of this large body of recent
journal articles dealing with SME's use of eBusiness in order to
identify trends and opportunities for new future research directions.
Previous analyses of SME-eBusiness literature have tended to take
the form of meta-analyses which have focused on identifying and
analysing factors (drivers and barriers) which aim to predict or explain
why SMEs adopt (or do not adopt) different forms of eBusiness (see
Premkumar 2003; Teo et al. 2004). Premkumar's (2003) meta-analysis in particular examined only pre-2000 articles, and did not include
non-IS journals or eBusiness journals (for example, Journal of Small
Business and Enterprise Development and Electronic Markets respectively)
which we discovered are common publication venues for SME-eBusiness
studies.
While such "adoption factor" meta-analyses are useful,
the existing studies do not offer insights into broader trends relating
to the types of research (for example, data collection approaches and
research objectives) being conducted and into the future research
opportunities these trends might present. Jeyaraj et al's (2006)
recent meta-analysis addresses this to some extent when examining
possible research biases in adoption studies, but their study focused on
pre-2000 research on individual and organisational adoption of IT
generally, not recent SME or eBusiness research. We believe that such
meta-analyses of adoption factors will perpetuate the tendency in the
literature to conduct only adoption factor research.
Our aim, by contrast, was to look at the body of research more
broadly (for example, by considering the data collection approaches used
and research objectives of the studies) to identify opportunities for
new, broad research directions beyond adoption factor studies. While we
do not claim our analysis was exhaustive, it can be considered
reasonably indicative because the journal articles used were published
in relevant, peer-reviewed academic journals. Indeed, the broader nature
of our analysis has identified a number of limitations of existing
research such as the tendency to:
* treat SMEs and eBusiness applications homogeneously rather than
as highly diverse, complex entities;
* repeat adoption factor studies which we believe have now reached
saturation point; and
* focus on SMEs themselves without considering the impact of the
complex relationships many small firms in particular have such as with
family, friends, other businesses and eBusiness solution providers (not
just trading partners as suggested in the literature).
As a consequence of the literature analysis reported in this paper,
we argue that there is a need for new research directions which move
beyond identifying and evaluating adoption factors.
This paper therefore makes a valuable contribution to the analysis
of SME-eBusiness research by addressing the limitations of past
literature analyses because it includes 120 key SME-eBusiness journal
articles published from 2003 to 2006 (not pre-2000 articles); it
includes non-IS and eBusiness journals (53 journals in total); and it
identifies major trends in the data collection approaches employed,
countries and eBusiness technologies studied, and research objectives
focused upon, rather than focusing purely on analysing adoption factors
as in existing meta-analyses. Indeed, our paper is one of few (if any)
extensive literature analyses of 2003-06 journal articles. It also
presents some of our initial broad suggestions on new research
directions which we believe will help overcome the limitations with the
existing body of SME-eBusiness research. Among these directions, we
argue for future research which investigates appropriate programmes,
approaches and tools which can help SME owners (and the external parties
who might help them) to make informed decisions about which business
applications of eBusiness technologies are appropriate given the unique
context of each SME.
The paper is structured as follows. We firstly explain how relevant
journal articles were identified. Next we describe the way in which the
analysis of these articles was undertaken and then present the major
trends in four areas: the data collection approaches used; the eBusiness
technologies or applications studied; the countries studied; and the
research objectives of the articles. We then outline some initial broad
suggestions on needed future research directions based on our analysis.
Finally we make some concluding remarks.
2 Approach to identifying SME-eBusiness journal articles
Articles used for the literature analysis were selected on the
basis that they were journal articles involving conceptual or empirical
work focusing on SMEs and eBusiness, and were peer-reviewed academic
journals. The search for SME-related articles included terms such as
small business and small firm to find relevant articles. eBusiness
applications included in the search included EDI, websites, email,
e-enabled supply chain management (e-SCM), customer relationship
management (e-CRM) and knowledge management (e-KM). eBusiness
technologies such as Internet connectivity and intranets were also
considered appropriate, so long as it was apparent the articles were
concerned with these technologies being used for eBusiness. We did not
include articles focusing on the use of specific internal applications
such as accounting software if the use of this software did not involve
some kind of network which underpins eBusiness.
We included only peer-reviewed academic journals to ensure that the
articles analysed were of higher quality when compared to journals with
no peer-review process. We analysed a wide range of publication venues
(including specialist journals in such areas as supply chain management
and knowledge management) to ensure a broad coverage of SME-eBusiness
research. This was important because we concluded that focusing on just
a few publication venues (for example, only high-ranking IS journals)
might introduce bias towards a reduced number of eBusiness technologies
or towards particular data collection approaches. The list of
publication venues used for our SME-eBusiness literature analysis can be
seen in Table 1.
We included only journal articles published between 2003 and 2006
to ensure that our analysis focused on recent research. We did not
consider articles published in 2002 and earlier to be recent research
because of the long publication cycle of many journals (typically
between 12 to 24 months), which meant the research reported in such
articles would be five years old or older. We considered including
conference papers because of the long journal publication cycle and
because they might reflect the most recent SME-eBusiness research when
compared to journal articles alone. However, we included only journal
articles because we wanted to focus our analysis on publications of
higher quality (or at least more refined) than those typically found in
conferences. Indeed, journal articles are often improved versions of
conference papers which incorporate feedback from conference
participants, as well as the conference and journal reviewers.
The articles were identified by searching online databases (such as
Emerald, ScienceDirect and EBSCOHost) and Google Scholar. We
predominantly restricted the articles to those which were available in
full-text via our University's library. While this meant that some
SME-eBusiness journal articles might have been missed, our wide search
and inclusion of 120 journal articles enabled us to confirm with some
degree of confidence that this paper reports on the only analysis (or
one of the few) concerning an extensive collection of recent journal
articles. We also believe the major research trends identified from our
analysis can be considered reasonably indicative because the journal
articles were published in relevant, peer-reviewed academic journals.
Table 1 summarises the 53 journals from which the articles were
identified and analysed. It is not surprising that many of the articles
came from journals dedicated to SME research such as Journal of Small
Business and Enterprise Development and Small Business Economics, in
addition to IS and eBusiness journals such as Electronic Markets,
European Journal of Information Systems and Information &
Management. This table demonstrates the following:
* There is a wide range of publishing outlets for SME-eBusiness
research, although as a consequence this has tended to fragment the
SME-eBusiness research.
* SME-eBusiness articles have been appearing consistently
throughout the period 2003 to 2006, with similar numbers of articles
each year. It should be noted that the search was not exhaustive and
there are too few years covered for insights into historical publishing
trends to be commented upon. Further, the smaller number of 2006
articles is partly a reflection that many journal issues published
toward the end of 2006 were still not available via our
University's online databases (or inter-library loans) when we
conducted our literature analysis in early 2007.
3 Major SME-eBusiness research trends and future opportunities
In this section we identify major trends emerging from our analysis
of the SME-eBusiness articles by examining the eBusiness technologies
and countries studied, the data collection approaches employed and the
primary research objective of each article. This analysis enabled us to
identify broad commonalities and differences in the literature, as well
as limitations, and to determine potential new directions for future
research. It should be noted that while the results are mostly broken
down by year, the articles analysed do not cover a sufficiently long
period for reliable historical trends to be analysed.
3.1 A predominant focus on observational data collection approaches
The data collection approaches reported in the articles were
identified and categorised based on the description of the research
design or method in each article. A summary of the data collection
approaches used in the articles is provided in Table 2. We aimed to
categorise the data collection approaches consistently, which in a few
cases involved putting an article in a different category than suggested
by the article's method section. For example, an article was
categorised as a case study only if it was clear it involved more
extensive data collection than a semi-structured interview with one
employee in an the SME (for example, analysis of documents and/or
interviewing multiple staff and/or observing behaviour). This ensured
that the categorisation was more consistent with the majority of
articles which described the equivalent data collection approach as a
semi-structured interview. It should also be noted that studies which
involved (semi-structured) interviews purely to develop a survey
instrument were not categorised as "combined qualitative and
quantitative data collection", because the findings from the
interviews were not reported in these articles.
It was encouraging that both qualitative and quantitative data
collection of varying types were published, with no apparent bias toward
one type. More specifically, 39 articles reported qualitative data and
55 on quantitative data. In addition, 19 articles combined qualitative
and quantitative data collection to address the limitations of using one
category of collection only. This finding also shows that there are
publication venues which support both quantitative and qualitative
research.
It can be seen from Table 2 that only 9 articles reported results
from longitudinal research, such as comparing survey results over time,
or studying SMEs and their eBusiness use over time. This represents a
gap in the research because SMEs can develop their eBusiness capability
or change their direction quite quickly. We conclude that there is an
opportunity for longitudinal studies, both quantitative and qualitative,
which examine temporal issues affecting SME eBusiness use. Such research
is important because it charts the development of eBusiness adoption and
the effect of experience, experimentation and intervention by third
parties. This could include studying why some SMEs might abandon
eBusiness initiatives over time, rather than expanding their use of and
investment in eBusiness.
The majority of the data collection approaches employed by authors
of the SME-eBusiness articles aimed to document post hoc eBusiness use
and adoption among SMEs. However there are comparatively few examples in
which the primary objective of researchers was to take an active (rather
than observational) role in encouraging and supporting SME use of
eBusiness. Some notable exceptions were Ihlstrom & Nilsson (2003),
McGovern & Hicks (2004) and Ray & Ray's (2006) action
research studies where they assisted SMEs with eBusiness knowledge and
project development, and Hari et al's (2005) knowledge management
education CD developed for the construction industry.
Another issue with the focus on post hoc data collection approaches
(especially surveys) is that they only elicit the perceptions of SME
owner/managers. Jeyaraj et al. (2006) point out that, in the context of
individual and organisational IT adoption generally, there is evidence
emerging that perceived system use does not correlate with actual system
use. This suggests that data collection approaches which focus on an SME
respondent's perception of eBusiness use might not produce reliable
insights into actual eBusiness usage or practices (for example, strategy
development). Future research which observes actual SME behaviour with
regards to eBusiness (for example, website content analysis, case
studies and action research) might help address this limitation.
3.2 eBusiness technologies and applications studied
Further insights into SME-eBusiness research trends were gained
when examining the eBusiness technologies and applications reported in
the journal articles analysed, as summarised in Table 3. The articles
were categorised based on the eBusiness examples specified by the
article authors or, if this was unclear, based on the description of
eBusiness technologies or applications in their results. This proved to
be a challenge in some cases where authors referred merely to such
technologies or applications as the Internet, Web, websites, eCommerce,
eBusiness, ICT and IS/IT, rather than the specific technologies or
applications used (or not) by SMEs. The conceptual/theoretical papers,
which have been separated in Table 3, as expected tended to use such
broad, generic terms rather than referring to specific eBusiness
applications.
The first major observation from Table 3 was the surprising
tendency by many researchers to treat the applications of the Internet
and the Web collectively. This is problematic because these technologies
can be used for a plethora of quite different business applications (see
Chong 2006) such as for sales, product catalogue, payments, procurement,
online brochure, employee recruitment, online banking and online service
delivery. Treating the Internet or Web collectively fails to consider
that there might be different mitigating factors influencing SME
adoption decisions (or variations in use of "the Internet" or
"the Web") regarding specific applications of these tools. For
example, some small firm proprietors are not interested in expanding
their customer-base (Castleman 2004), so that a web-based marketing
channel might not be appropriate. If owners of such businesses only
perceive the web as a marketing tool, they would most likely state that
the web is not suitable for their business. By contrast, if these same
proprietors perceive the web as an online customer service channel or as
a way to access services such as banking, then their answer to the exact
same question about the perceived suitability of the web might be quite
different. This example highlights the problems which can arise when
researchers treat the Web as a collective term and merely query why SMEs
have or have not adopted a website. Semi-structured interviews offer an
opportunity to delve deeper into these complex issues, which is more
difficult with surveys. This limitation of many SME-eBusiness studies
must be addressed in future to ensure that the heterogeneous nature of
Internet/Web applications is taken into account by treating these
applications separately. The implications of this for future research
are examined further in sections 3.4 and 4.
Another major observation is that, not surprisingly, there has been
a strong focus in the SME-eBusiness literature over the last few years
on the Internet, websites and email. Table 3 suggests future research
could target other eBusiness technologies, and their business
applications, which have received comparatively little attention, such
as SME use of teleworking, online training and mobile commerce. It is
likely that there are other SME studies in these areas we did not
identify, and that more exhaustive article searches in future could
determine the full extent of research in these areas.
3.3 A predominant focus on single country studies
Further major trends in the recent SME-eBusiness journal literature
emerged when we examined the countries in which the authors conducted
their empirical work, as summarised in Table 4. Since our focus was on
the country targeted for empirical investigations, we did not categorise
conceptual and theoretical papers based on countries.
The first major observation from Table 4 is that a large proportion
(21%) of the SME-eBusiness articles analysed investigated SMEs in the
UK. This might reflect the government funding which has been provided in
the UK to stimulate eBusiness adoption and use by SMEs in various areas
such as Wales (for example, Jones et al. 2003b) and the West Midlands (for example, Matlay & Addis 2003). In addition, over half the
articles (52%) analysed investigated SMEs in the UK, USA, Australia,
Canada and New Zealand. This suggests that there are future research
opportunities and a need for SME-eBusiness research in developing and/or
non-native English speaking countries. Although it is quite possible
that such research is being published, but not necessarily in English
language journals accessible via our University's online research
databases.
Another major observation from Table 4 is that only 9 articles
included cross-country comparisons. This suggests a future research
opportunity for cross-cultural SME-eBusiness studies to determine the
extent to which SME eBusiness adoption and use varies given national and
cultural contexts. Given the adoption factor style of research which
dominants this field (discussed in the next section), the studies often
focus on a particular country to reduce the number of independent
variables (among other reasons). Indeed, MacGregor & Vrazalic
(2005a; 2005b), who conducted the two Australia-Sweden comparative
studies, chose the particular regions in both countries based on their
similarities at the macro-level. Beck et al. (2005a; 2005b), who
conducted the two USA-Germany-Denmark-France comparative studies, did
compare eBusiness use, benefits and barriers between the four countries,
but they did not explore the possible national or cultural contexts
(among other things) which might have given rise to these variances.
3.4 A central concern with SME adoption/use of eBusiness
More interesting major trends among the SME-eBusiness articles
analysed were identified when we classified the articles based on their
primary research objective. The primary objective of an article was
determined from any statements about the objective by the article
authors. If the objective was unclear, it was determined by assessing
the nature of the empirical findings to deduce the primary research
objective. This involved reading each paper, with particular emphasis on
the article authors' stated objectives in the introduction and the
lead-in to the empirical work (where applicable). The broad themes or
categories of research objectives were identified inductively using a
condensation approach.
The literature analysis was conducted by the first author. While
this single researcher approach to the analysis had the potential to
introduce researcher bias, our aim was to conduct a more exhaustive
literature analysis (120 journal articles) than previous analyses in the
literature so that we could identify major trends and future research
opportunities from an indicative body of work. We could have addressed
researcher bias by conducting independent analyses and then comparing
our findings to arrive at a consensus about the categories and article
classifications. This would not, however, have achieved our aim because
it would have meant restricting the analysis to a much smaller number of
articles, and thereby limiting the more indicative insights into the
SME-eBusiness literature achievable when analysing a greater number of
articles. An alternative would have been to divide the 120 journal
articles between us and later combine the categories and article
classifications into a single collection. However, we believed it was
better for one researcher to do the entire analysis so that the
resulting categories and article classifications were consistent across
all 120 journal articles. In Table 5 we have included all 120 articles
and the category to which each was assigned for those wanting to
replicate this work.
As stated in section 3.1, most articles employed data collection
approaches which focused on documenting post hoc perceptions of SME
informants about eBusiness. Indeed, the majority of the articles were
descriptive studies of eBusiness adoption and/or use by SMEs, with many
exploring a range of drivers, barriers and critical success factors, or
a subset of these factors. Table 5 summarises the primary research
objective of each article analysed. A number of insights emerged when we
categorised the articles based on their primary research objective:
Firstly, it is apparent that the majority of the SME-eBusiness
articles analysed focus primarily on studying the SMEs themselves (Brown
& Lockett 2004), with limited research into the supply-side of
innovation diffusion (some notable exceptions are Beckinsale et al.
2006; de Guinea et al. 2005). The need for more research which
specifically addresses this issue was evident in the few articles which
did explore, to some extent, the dissatisfaction with vendors,
consultants and Internet Service Providers (ISPs) by some SMEs. For
example, some SMEs did not know whom they could trust regarding
eBusiness knowledge, did not achieve the anticipated benefits from the
eBusiness solutions provided, or believed vendors/consultants cost too
much (see Al-Qirim 2006; Brown & Lockett 2004; de Guinea et al.
2005; Karanasios & Burgess 2006; Lawson et al. 2003; Stansfield
& Grant 2003). In addition, Jones et al (2003a) also found
conflicting expectations between SMEs and ISPs/advisers, where SMEs
expected them to provide eBusiness "how-to" knowledge, but the
ISPs/advisers did not have the ability or desire to provide it.
Similarly, only a few studies examined the role of governments, industry
associations, clusters and business networks (a few exceptions include
Brown & Lockett 2004; Lawson et al. 2003; Martin & Matlay 2003;
Simpson & Docherty 2004; Spurge & Roberts 2005), but where such
roles were examined it was often a by-product rather than a focus in
many of these studies. Fink & Disterer (2006) and Beckinsale et al.
(2006) were notable exceptions because they specifically looked at the
impact of external parties such as trading partners, industry
associations, vendors, etc on eBusiness adoption by SMEs. Further, some
authors studied the role of web-based information resources (Thomas et
al. 2004) and the impact of the accreditation of ICT advisers (Morgan et
al. 2006), but these studies did not examine the impact of these
initiatives on SMEs themselves. Simpson & Docherty (2004) were an
exception to this. This indicates that there is a need for research
which looks beyond SMEs themselves and focuses on the supply-side of
eBusiness, such as how SMEs can gain eBusiness "know-how" or
"how-to" knowledge and which sources are effective and trusted
by SMEs.
Secondly, a large number of studies focused on identifying adoption
factors, which suggests that there is a need for more novel
SME-eBusiness studies which move beyond identifying or confirming the
influence of adoption factors. To a large extent Wymer &
Regan's (2005) consolidation of previous SME-eBusiness adoption
factor research into a single, coherent framework of factors should
obviate the need for studies aimed purely at identifying factors. The
exception might be those studies which examine comparatively new or
neglected eBusiness applications. For example, Clear & Dickson (2005) looked at SME teleworking practices, Fisher & Craig (2005)
and Gengatharan & Standing (2005) examined regional electronic
marketplaces for SMEs, and Wong & Aspinwall (2005) studied SME
knowledge management adoption factors. These studies identified some
adoption factors which were different to previous research due to the
unique attributes of their respective eBusiness domain. While adoption
factor based studies are useful, we argue that the SME-eBusiness
research community has now reached a point where we can progress beyond
these well-established adoption factors and start to conduct research
which will help SMEs to overcome the barriers and exploit the drivers.
Examples might include researchers taking a more active, rather than
observational, role in helping to improve SMEs' perception of the
relevance of eBusiness. This could involve more action research studies
such as those summarised in section 3.1 and Matlay & Addis'
(2003) study of the impact of higher-education-based consultancy on SME
adoption of eBusiness in particular. This would complement our call for
more innovation supply-side research which we suggested previously.
Thirdly, we found that there is a tendency in the SME-eBusiness
literature to treat SMEs as a homogenous group, varying only on the
basis of broad demographics such as size and industry. Some authors (for
example, see Beckinsale et al. 2006; Castleman 2004; Levy & Powell 2003; Matlay & Addis 2003; Putterill 2004; Ramsey et al. 2003;
Taylor & Murphy 2004) point out, however, that individual SMEs vary
widely from one another in ways overlooked by many studies, such as
strategic focus, customer orientation, business growth, business
processes, owner attitude and social networks. In addition, Castleman
(2004) also argues that empirical evidence in Australia shows that not
all small business operators are governed by business-oriented
objectives such as profit, growth, competitive advantage and so on. Many
small business decision-makers exhibit quite different (but equally
understandable) rationalities which are governed more by social and
family issues. For example, their decisions might be influenced by
issues such as preserving the owner's sense of personal identity
and control which is defined by their firm, ensuring that the owner has
more time for family, maintaining parental authority in the firm, and
even cementing relationships with friends, social networks and customers
through telephone and face-to-face interactions. Bottom-line considerations are less important to these types of small firms than
social and family issues. This is perhaps why studies which treat SMEs
homogenously find conflicting results concerning the correlations
between owner, firm and environmental adoption factors, and the uptake of eBusiness technologies and applications (for example, see Wymer &
Regan 2005). This should not come as a surprise, we posit, because the
heterogeneous nature of SMEs (and of eBusiness, as we argued in section
3.2) implies there are a plethora of combinations of factors potentially
influencing eBusiness adoption and/or use by SMEs. The limited sample
sizes in current SME studies could never hope to discover correlations
between a full set adoption factors (if indeed such a list could be
compiled) and the set of SME characteristics describing their
heterogeneity. In addition, this SME diversity also implies that the
benefits of a business application of eBusiness technology could be
perceived and valued quite differently among SMEs due to their
heterogeneity. The challenge for researchers in future studies (as well
as for practitioners) will be determining ways in which we might match
the unique combination of characteristics exhibited by and business
objectives of a particular SME with one or more specific business
applications of eBusiness technology. This also suggests that only some
(if any) eBusiness applications might be appropriate for specific SMEs,
and that their nonadoption decisions are perfectly rational (see
Castleman 2004).
This emphasises the importance of future research which explores
how eBusiness solution providers and advocates (including researchers
themselves) can help SME senior managers to understand and match the
benefits of a specific business application of eBusiness technology with
their unique context and business needs. We also need to avoid what
Castleman (2004) calls a technological expansionist view that adoption
is always a good thing and that failure to adopt is a sign of failure,
for instance, of the SME or government. Instead, we believe that
non-adoption by SMEs can be appropriate and, indeed, desirable if
eBusiness solution providers cannot demonstrate to SMEs that an
eBusiness-based solution can address their specific business needs and
context, or if the SME's specific needs and context does not lend
itself to eBusiness.
Our initial suggestions on potential future research directions for
SME-eBusiness researchers which we believe will help address these
issues are outlined in the next section.
4 Proposed directions for research on SME eBusiness behaviour
One major change in future research direction we suggest, based on
the limitations of existing SME-eBusiness literature, is to focus more
critically on the supply-side of eBusiness. While the existing research
has identified a range of adoption factors, such as owner and firm
characteristics, it is unrealistic to expect SMEs to change many of
these characteristics (for example, become less risk averse) so that
they will be more likely to adopt eBusiness. Instead, future research
needs to be more critical of the responsibility and ability of vendors,
consultants, ISPs and other solution providers to provide each
individual, unique SME with a compelling business case to adopt an
eBusiness solution which matches their personal and business goals. The
appropriateness of this eBusiness supply-side approach to future
research can be seen both from a theoretical and empirical point of
view:
* Rogers' (1995) innovation diffusion theory emphasises the
essential role of perceived relative advantage as an innovation
characteristic influencing the rate of adoption. Indeed, relative
advantage (or perceived benefit) is a strong predictor of adoption,
although on its own it does not guarantee adoption (Al-Qirim 2005; Ching & Ellis 2004; Del Aguila-Obra & Padilla-Melendez 2006; Fillis et
al. 2003; Gemino et al. 2006; Kaynak et al. 2005; Pflughoeft et al.
2003; Stansfield & Grant 2003; Wymer & Regan 2005). For a
benefit to be perceived, however, it stands to reason that a business
application of eBusiness technology must address a specific business
need or problem of the SME, and that the decision-maker(s) of the SME
are convinced of this benefit. The importance of convincing an SME
decision-maker of the benefit is also implied in Rogers'
innovation-decision process where the first three stages involve: (1)
gaining knowledge about an innovation (for example, awareness and
know-how knowledge); (2) which leads to an attitude toward the
innovation; and (3) then a decision regarding adoption. The degree to
which Rogers' theory applies to SMEs might be debated and will be
the subject of another paper. However, the theory does support the
notion that the business applications of eBusiness technology must match
the unique context and business needs of an SME (or there will be no
perceived relative advantage), and that an important role for eBusiness
solution providers is to offer know-how knowledge which is convincing to
influence attitudes and adoption decisions.
* Attewell's (1992) theory of complex innovation adoption
(which includes eBusiness applications) argues that what he calls
mediating institutions (who are typically solution providers) have a
central role to play. This is because the adoption of complex
innovations requires the transfer of complex know-how knowledge which is
typically only obtained when organisations learn by using the adoption,
which helps explain why SME knowledge about eBusiness and its benefits
does not necessarily result in adoption. Mediating institutions create
and accumulate the know-how as a result of implementing on behalf of
many adopters, and thus achieve economies of scale.
* Davis' Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is an extension of
the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) which posits that perceived ease of
use and perceived usefulness are predictors of attitudes towards use and
intentions to use a technology (Grandon & Pearson 2004). Perceived
usefulness is associated with perceived benefit, because it relates to
the extent that an individual (such as an SME owner/manager) believes a
technology (an eBusiness application in this context) will have a
performance benefit (Riemenschneider et al. 2003). Grandon & Pearson
(2004) found that the perceived usefulness and ease of use constructs
were among the most significant factors influencing Internet/web
adoption. TAM and the associated findings of Grandon & Pearson
provide support for the notion that it is important that SME
decision-makers perceive that an eBusiness application will address the
business need of an SME. This suggests that eBusiness solution providers
have a central role in changing SME decision-maker perceptions.
* The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) is also an extension of TRA
and aims to explain the link between attitudes and behaviour intention,
which consequently can lead to action such as the adoption of an
eBusiness application (Harrison et al. 1997). Harrison et al. (1997)
explains that a positive attitude toward a behaviour (such as adoption
of an eBusiness application) is based on the degree to which the person
believes mostly positive outcomes (such as benefits) will occur. This
supports the notion that external parties will have a central role in
encouraging positive attitudes among SME decision-makers.
* Reimenschneider et al. (2003) devised a model which comprised TAM
and TPB. Similarly, Venkatesh et al. (2003) developed the Unified Theory
of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) which combines eight
theoretical models including TAM and TPB. Factors such as relative
advantage, perceived usefulness and outcome expectations (which are all
interrelated and based on a perception of benefits from adoption or use)
underpin the UTAUT's performance expectancy construct.
Reimenschneider et al. (2003) found that their combined model
demonstrated a more superior fit with their data, and that the decisions
by small firm executives to adopt websites were primarily due to
anticipated benefits and social approval. Again, this supports the
notion that an important aspect of SME adoption of a business
application of eBusiness technology is an expectation that it will
address a specific business need, and also that external parties will
have a central role in shaping these expectations.
This suggests that unless SME senior managers (or employees in an
SME) already have a positive attitude toward eBusiness and know-how,
eBusiness solution providers and advocates need to convince SME senior
managers (and promote positive attitudes) that the firm can obtain
benefits before adoption will occur. We therefore posit that there is a
need for eBusiness supply-side research which investigates and develops
programmes, approaches and tools to help SME owners (or the external
parties who might help them) to determine which eBusiness applications
correspond with the unique context of each SME and their specific
business needs.
Our analysis of the limitations of the existing SME-eBusiness
literature enabled us to identify a number of new directions for future
research, many of which will involve a greater eBusiness supply-side
view of SME adoption of eBusiness:
1. Explore the dimensions on which SMEs are heterogeneous using
both quantitative and qualitative research which builds upon recent work
in the SME-eBusiness field (for example, see Beckinsale et al. 2006;
Castleman 2004; Levy & Powell 2003; Matlay & Addis 2003;
Putterill 2004; Ramsey et al. 2003; Taylor & Murphy 2004) and the
small business literature more generally. Such dimensions of
heterogeneity might include the strategic focus, customer orientation,
business growth, business processes, owner attitude toward technology
and social/business network participation of SMEs. This might also
include identifying the full range of different business goals which
SMEs might have, such as leisure and lifestyle in addition to more
economic rationalist goals such as firm growth. The development of
survey and interview instruments aimed at exploring SME adoption/use of
eBusiness should include constructs which take these heterogeneous
dimensions of SMEs into account.
2. Identify the full range of eBusiness applications which are
applicable to SMEs. There is already research in this area which can be
drawn upon, but the tendency of existing literature to treat the
Internet and Web (for instance) homogeneously highlights the need to
distinguish between the uses of these technologies for sales, product
catalogues, payments, online brochures, employee recruitment, online
banking and online service delivery. Since the literature focuses on
Internet, Web and email use by SMEs, future research should also provide
greater attention to other technologies such as mobile computing and
associated business applications such as telework. Future quantitative
and qualitative research can focus on determining which applications are
most suitable for which SME business goals and dimensions of
heterogeneity.
3. Examine the internal parties (such as business partners,
employees, etc), family, friends and external influences (such as
education institutions, consultancies, government, industry
associations, accountants, vendors, etc) SMEs trust most for eBusiness
advice, support and services. This research should also investigate the
reasons underpinning this trust, which might depend on the heterogeneous
characteristics of the SME, the type of advice/service being provided,
previous experience with the parties concerned, and other issues.
4. Investigate the knowledge expectation gaps between SMEs and
particular types of parties in terms of their eBusiness know-how and
other needs. For example, the evidence from our literature analysis
suggests that there might be different expectations of SMEs and
ISPs/vendors/consultants with regards to the types of eBusiness related
knowledge and services which are needed. Similarly, the parties which
SMEs might trust for business advice (see the previous point concerning
trust) may not have the required eBusiness knowledge, and thus present
another type of expectation gap. This will necessitate network analysis
type research (using a combination of quantitative and qualitative data
collection approaches) to examine this complex mix of influences of
internal and external parties on SME decision-makers regarding the
appropriateness and uptake of specific eBusiness applications.
Beckinsale et al (2006) provides a good starting point for this type of
research, which includes a suggested way in which to model the
interrelationships between actors in the network of individuals and
businesses.
5. Explore the types of intervention strategies which can be used
within the network of trust and eBusiness support relationships aimed at
SMEs. Research in this area could include quantitative and qualitative
research which examines the effectiveness of particular strategies, such
as tools for assisting small firms with performing cost-benefit analyses
for specific eBusiness applications, education programmes (such as
workshops and role-playing simulations), skills and advice resource
offerings, action-oriented consultancies, and so on. This research could
also investigate which parties are best positioned to use particular
intervention strategies based on SME trust preferences, as well as
recognising the heterogeneity of SMEs.
6. Identify and investigate new forms of eBusiness solutions which
address the difficulties which SMEs face using eBusiness applications.
For example, this might include novel solutions to address security
concerns or the difficulties faced with integrating software from
different providers. This could include research which is now emerging
concerning SME use of Application Service Providers (see, for example,
Brown & Lockett 2007; Lee et al. 2007).
7. Conduct longitudinal research using both quantitative and
qualitative data collection approaches to address the current limitation
in existing research which tends to provide single snap-shots SME
adoption of eBusiness. This could include action research projects,
longitudinal case studies and comparing survey results over an extended
period of time. Longitudinal research is important because SMEs can
develop their eBusiness capability or change their direction quite
quickly, and because it charts eBusiness adoption development and the
effect of experience, experimentation and intervention by third parties.
8. Design data collection regimes to include observations of actual
use of eBusiness by SMEs rather than relying entirely on informant perceptions of use. This was identified as a major limitation of
existing SME-eBusiness research. We recognised that observing actual use
is more difficult, time-consuming and less generalisable (especially
longitudinal case studies and action research), but it would offer a way
to verify whether any differences between perceived and actual
use/practices exist. This could be achieved with minimal additional
investment of time if researchers conduct a few confirmatory studies
which investigate actual eBusiness practices by SME managers and
employees; and which complement surveys and semi-structured interviews
which rely upon the SME informant's perceptions.
9. Examine cross-cultural variances which can occur among SMEs in
various countries to identify, for instance, the similarities and
differences with regards to adoption profiles, the influence of regional
contexts, and the extent to which SME heterogeneity varies between
countries (if at all). An important research direction identified from
our literature analysis is the need to encourage further research into
SME eBusiness adoption in non-native English speaking countries and
developing countries. Where this research is occurring, we need to
encourage publication of this research in English language journals to
broaden the profile of the existing body of SME-eBusiness research which
currently tends to be biased towards the UK, USA, Australia and New
Zealand.
It is beyond the scope of this paper to elaborate on these
potential research directions further--this will be the focus of future
papers. However the proposed research directions (resulting from our
extensive literature analysis) provide some initial, broad suggestions
for SME-eBusiness researchers on future research which can be explored
and on issues to consider when designing future data collection
instruments. More specifically, we anticipate that the initial ideas
outlined here will encourage researchers to undertake research which
moves beyond adoption factor type studies. Indeed, we anticipate that
research in the areas identified could well contribute to greater levels
of adoption of eBusiness applications by SMEs--if adoption is applicable
to the specific SMEs at all.
5 Conclusions
The paper presented an analysis of recent SME-eBusiness literature
which addresses limitations of previous similar studies by analysing
current journal articles from 2003 to 2006 (instead of pre-2000
articles) from a range of journals (instead of just a few journals).
More importantly the paper was more than just a meta-analysis of
adoption factors, because it identified trends emerging relating to
eBusiness applications and countries studied, data collection approaches
used and primary research objectives focused upon. The paper highlighted
potential future research directions based on these major trends
including the need for research which:
* considers the heterogeneous nature of eBusiness (and its varied
business applications) and of SMEs;
* focuses on the supply-side of eBusiness diffusion;
* studies the temporal effects related to SME use of eBusiness
applications with longitudinal studies; and
* moves beyond the current focus on identifying and studying
specific adoption factors by looking at the social, knowledge sharing
and trust aspects associated with adoption decisions by SMEs.
We believe our suggestions for future research directions will have
important implications because we anticipate they will encourage the
practitioner and research communities to take a more active role in
promoting SME adoption of eBusiness and to take into account that
specific eBusiness applications should match with the unique context and
business needs of SMEs. We argue that an important aim of this future
research should be on identifying and investigating appropriate
programmes, approaches and tools which can help SME owners (and the
external parties who might help them) to make informed decisions about
which business applications of eBusiness technologies are appropriate
for them.
7 Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the anonymous reviewers (of both this
version and earlier drafts) for their helpful comments and suggestions.
Received 23 July 2007; Revised 29 October 2007; Accepted 7 November 2007; Online 9 November 2007
6 References
Alexander, C., Pearson, J.M. and Crosby, L. (2003) 'The
transition to e-commerce: a case study of a rural-based travel
agency', Journal of Internet Commerce, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 49-63.
Alonso Mendo, F. and Fitzgerald, G. (2005) 'A multidimensional
framework for SME e-business progression', Journal of Enterprise
Information Management, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 678-96.
Al-Qirim, N.A.Y. (2003) 'E-commerce in the aerial mapping
industry: a New Zealand case study', Journal of Systems &
Information Technology, vol. 7, no. 1-2, pp. 67-92.
Al-Qirim, N.A.Y. (2005) 'An empirical investigation of an
e-commerce adoption-capability model in small businesses in New
Zealand', Electronic Markets, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 418-37.
Al-Qirim, N.A.Y. (2006) 'Personas of e-commerce adoption in
small businesses in New Zealand', Journal of Electronic Commerce in
Organizations, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 18-45.
Ashworth, C.J., Schmidt, R.A., Pioch, E.A. and Hallsworth, A.
(2006) '"Web-weaving": an approach to sustainable
e-retail and online advantage in lingerie fashion marketing',
International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, vol. 34,
no. 6, pp. 497-511.
Attewell, P. (1992) 'Technology diffusion and organizational
learning: the case of business computing', Organization Science,
vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-19.
Auger, P. (2005) 'The impact of interactivity and design
sophistication on the performance of commercial websites for small
businesses', Journal of Small Business Management, vol. 43, no. 2,
pp. 119-37.
Barnes, D., Hinton, M. and Mieczkowska, S. (2004) 'Avoiding
the fate of the dotbombs: lessons from three surviving dotcom
start-ups', Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development,
vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 329-37.
Beach, R. (2004) 'Adopting Internet technology in
manufacturing: a strategic perspective', Production Planning &
Control, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 80-9.
Beck, R., Wigand, R. and Konig, W. (2005a) 'The diffusion and
efficient use of electronic commerce among small and medium-sized
enterprises: an international three-industry survey', Electronic
Markets, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 38-52.
Beck, R., Wigand, R.T. and Konig, W. (2005b) 'Integration of
e-commerce by SMEs in the manufacturing sector: a data envelopment
analysis approach', Journal of Global Information Management, vol.
13, no. 3, pp. 20-32.
Beckinsale, M., Levy, M. and Powell, P. (2006) 'Exploring
internet adoption drivers in SMEs', Electronic Markets, vol. 16,
no. 4, pp. 361-70.
Brown, D.H. and Lockett, N. (2004) 'Potential of critical
e-applications for engaging SMEs in e-business: a provider
perspective', European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 13, no.
1, pp. 21-34.
Brown, D.H. and Lockett, N. (2007) 'E-business, innovation and
SMEs: the significance of hosted services and firm aggregations',
International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management,
vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 92-112.
Burke, K. (2005) 'The impact of firm size on Internet use in
small businesses', Electronic Markets, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 79-93.
Caldeira, M.M. and Ward, J.M. (2003) 'Using resource-based
theory to interpret the successful adoption and use of information
systems and technology in manufacturing small and medium-sized
enterprises', European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 12, no.
2, pp. 127-41.
Castleman, T. (2004) 'Small businesses as social formations:
diverse rationalities in the context of e-business adoption', in:
N.A.Y. Al-Qirim (ed.) Electronic Commerce in Small to Medium-Sized
Enterprises: Frameworks, Issues and Implications, Idea Group Publishing,
Hershey, Pennsylvania, pp. 31-51.
Chau, S. (2003) 'The use of e-commerce amongst thirty-four
Australian SMEs: an experiment or a strategic business tool?'
Journal of Systems & Information Technology, vol. 7, no. 1-2, pp.
49-66.
Ching, H.L. and Ellis, P. (2004) 'Marketing in cyberspace:
what factors drive e-commerce adoption?' Journal of Marketing
Management, vol. 20, no. 3/4, pp. 409-29.
Chong, S. (2006) 'An empirical study of factors that influence
the extent of deployment of electronic commerce for small- and
mediumsized enterprises in Australia', Journal of Theoretical and
Applied Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 45-57.
Clear, F. and Dickson, K. (2005) 'Teleworking practice in
small and medium-sized firms: management style and worker
autonomy', New Technology, Work and Employment, vol. 20, no. 3, pp.
218-33.
Daniel, E. (2003) 'An exploration of the inside-out model:
e-commerce integration in UK SMEs', Journal of Small Business and
Enterprise Development, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 233-49.
de Guinea, A.O., Kelley, H. and Hunter, M.G. (2005)
'Information systems effectiveness in small businesses: extending a
Singaporean model in Canada', Journal of Global Information
Management, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 55-79.
de Klerk, S. and Kroon, J. (2005) 'E-commerce adoption in
South African businesses', South African Journal of Business
Management, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 33-40.
Del Aguila-Obra, A.R. and Padilla-Melendez, A. (2006)
'Organizational factors affecting Internet technology
adoption', Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications
and Policy, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 94-110.
Dholakia, R.R. and Kshetri, N. (2004) 'Factors impacting the
adoption of the internet among SMEs', Small Business Economics,
vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 311-22.
Egan, T., Clancy, S. and O'Toole, T. (2003) 'The
integration of e-commerce tools into the business process of SMEs',
Irish Journal of Management, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 139-53.
Fillis, I., Johansson, U. and Wagner, B. (2003) 'A
conceptualisation of the opportunities and barriers to e-business
development in the smaller firm', Journal of Small Business and
Enterprise Development, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 336-44.
Fink, D. and Disterer, G. (2006) 'International case studies:
to what extent is ICT infused into the operations of SMEs?' Journal
of Enterprise Information Management, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 608-24.
Fisher, J. and Craig, A. (2005) 'Developing business community
portals for SMEs--issues of design, development and
sustainability', Electronic Markets, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 136-45.
Fry, J., Tyrrall, D., Pugh, G. and Wyld, J. (2004) 'The
provision and accessibility of small business Web sites: a survey of
independent UK breweries', Journal of Small Business and Enterprise
Development, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 302-14.
Galloway, L. and Mochrie, R. (2005) 'The use of ICT in rural
firms: a policy-orientated literature review', Info, vol. 7, no. 3,
pp. 33-46.
Gemino, A., Mackay, N. and Reich, B.H. (2006) 'Executive
decisions about website adoption in small and medium-sized
enterprises', Journal of Information Technology Management, vol.
17, no. 1, pp. 34-49.
Gengatharen, D.E. and Standing, C. (2005) 'A framework to
assess the factors affecting success or failure of the implementation of
government-supported regional e-marketplaces for SMEs', European
Journal of Information Systems, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 417-33.
Grandon, E.E. and Mykytyn Jr, P.P. (2004) 'Theory-based
instrumentation to measure the intention to use electronic commerce in
small and medium sized businesses', Journal of Computer Information
Systems, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 44-57.
Grandon, E.E. and Pearson, J.M. (2004) 'Electronic commerce
adoption: an empirical study of small and medium US businesses',
Information & Management, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 197-216.
Hari, S., Egbu, C. and Kumar, B. (2005) 'A knowledge capture
awareness tool: an empirical study on small and medium enterprises in
the construction industry', Engineering Construction &
Architectural Management, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 533-67.
Harrison, D.A., Mykytyn Jr, P.P. and Riemenschneider, C.K. (1997)
'Executive decisions about adoption of information technology in
small business: theory and empirical tests', Information Systems
Research, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 171-95.
Hicks, B.J., Culley, S.J. and McMahon, C.A. (2006) 'A study of
issues relating to information management across engineering SMEs',
International Journal of Information Management, vol. 26, no. 4, pp.
267-89.
Houghton, K.A. and Winklhofer, H. (2004) 'The effect of
website and e-commerce adoption on the relationship between SMEs and
their export intermediaries', International Small Business Journal,
vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 369-88.
Hughes, M., Golden, W. and Powell, P. (2003)
'Inter-organisational ICT systems: the way to innovative practice
for SMEs?' Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development,
vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 277-86.
Ihlstrom, C. and Nilsson, M. (2003) 'E-business adoption by
SMEs--prerequisites and attitudes of SMEs in a Swedish network',
Journal of Organizational Computing & Electronic Commerce, vol. 13,
no. 3/4, pp. 211-23.
Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J.W. and Lacity, M.C. (2006) 'A review
of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption
research', Journal of Information Technology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp.
1-23.
Jones, C., Hecker, R. and Holland, P. (2003a) 'Small firm
Internet adoption: opportunities forgone, a journey not begun',
Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, vol. 10, no. 3,
pp. 287-97.
Jones, P., Beynon-Davies, P. and Muir, E. (2003b) 'Ebusiness
barriers to growth within the SME sector', Journal of Systems &
Information Technology, vol. 7, no. 1-2, pp. 1-26.
Karagozoglu, N. and Lindell, M. (2004) 'Electronic commerce
strategy, operations, and performance in small and medium-sized
enterprises', Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development,
vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 290-301.
Karanasios, S.S. and Burgess, S. (2006) 'Exploring the
internet use of small tourism enterprises: evidence from a developing
country', The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in
Developing Countries, vol. 27, pp. 1-12.
Kartiwi, M. (2006) 'Case studies of e-commerce adoption in
Indonesian SMEs: the evaluation of strategic use', Australasian
Journal of Information Systems, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 69-80.
Kaynak, E., Tatoglu, E. and Kula, V. (2005) 'An analysis of
the factors affecting the adoption of electronic commerce by SMEs:
evidence from an emerging market', International Marketing Review,
vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 623-40.
Kettinger, W.J. and Hackbarth, G. (2004) 'Integration of
electronic commerce networks into the sales processes of small
firms', Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 5, no. 3, pp.
153-71.
Khalifa, M. and Davison, M. (2006) 'SME adoption of IT: the
case of electronic trading systems', IEEE Transactions on
Engineering Management, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 275-84.
Khazanchi, D. (2005) 'Information technology (IT)
appropriateness: the contingency theory of "fit" and IT
implementation in small and medium enterprises', Journal of
Computer Information Systems, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 88-95.
Koh, S.C.L. and Maguire, S. (2004) 'Identifying the adoption
of e-business and knowledge management within SMEs', Journal of
Small Business and Enterprise Development, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 338-48.
Kula, V. and Tatoglu, E. (2003) 'An exploratory study of
Internet adoption by SMEs in an emerging market economy', European
Business Review, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 324-33.
Kyobe, M.E. (2004) 'Investigating the strategic utilization of
IT resources in the small and medium-sized firms of the eastern free
state province', International Small Business Journal, vol. 22, no.
2, pp. 131-58.
Lawson, R., Alcock, C., Cooper, J. and Burgess, L. (2003)
'Factors affecting adoption of electronic commerce technologies by
SMEs: an Australian study', Journal of Small Business and
Enterprise Development, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 265-76.
Lawson-Body, A. and O'Keefe, T.P. (2006)
'Interorganizational relationships in the context of SMEs' B2B
e-commerce', Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, vol.
4, no. 4, pp. 1-28.
Lee, J. (2004) 'Discriminant analysis of technology adoption
behaviour: a case of internet technologies in small business',
Journal of Computer Information Systems, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 57-66.
Lee, M.K.O. and Cheung, C.M.K. (2004) 'Internet retailing
adoption by small-to-medium sized enterprises (SMEs): a multiple-case
study', Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 385-97.
Lee, S.M., Lee, H.-H., Kim, J. and Lee, S.-G. (2007) 'ASP
system utilization: customer satisfaction and user performance',
Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 145-65.
Levenburg, N. (2005) 'Does size matter? Small firms' use
of e-business tools in the supply chain', Electronic Markets, vol.
15, no. 2, pp. 94-105.
Levy, M., Loebbecke, C. and Powell, P. (2003) 'SMEs,
co-opetition and knowledge sharing: the role of information
systems', European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 12, no. 1,
pp. 3-17.
Levy, M. and Powell, P. (2003) 'Exploring SME internet
adoption: towards a contingent model', Electronic Markets, vol. 13,
no. 2, pp. 173-81.
Lin, H.-F. and Lee, G.-G. (2005) 'Impact of organizational
learning and knowledge management factors on e-business adoption',
Management Decision, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 171-88.
Locke, S. (2004) 'ICT adoption and SME growth in New
Zealand', Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, vol.
4, no. 1/2, pp. 93-102.
Love, P.E.D. and Irani, Z. (2004) 'An exploratory study of
information technology evaluation and benefits management practices of
SMEs in the construction industry', Information & Management,
vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 227-42.
Love, P.E.D., Irani, Z., Standing, C., Lin, C. and Burn, J.M.
(2005) 'The enigma of evaluation: benefits, costs and risks of IT
in Australian small-medium-sized enterprises', Information &
Management, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 947-64.
Lucchetti, R. and Sterlacchini, A. (2004) 'The adoption of ICT
among SMEs: evidence from an Italian survey', Small Business
Economics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 151-68.
MacGregor, R.C. (2003) 'Strategic alliances and perceived
barriers to electronic commerce adoption in SMEs', Journal of
Systems & Information Technology, vol. 7, no. 1-2, pp. 27-48.
MacGregor, R.C. (2004a) 'Factors associated with formal
networking in regional small business: some findings from a study of
Swedish SMEs', Journal of Small Business and Enterprise
Development, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 60-74.
MacGregor, R.C. (2004b) 'The role of strategic alliances in
the ongoing use of electronic commerce technology in regional small
business', Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, vol. 2,
no. 1, pp. 1-14.
MacGregor, R.C. and Vrazalic, L. (2005a) 'A basic model of
electronic commerce adoption barriers: a study of regional small
businesses in Sweden and Australia', Journal of Small Business and
Enterprise Development, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 510-27.
MacGregor, R.C. and Vrazalic, L. (2005b) 'The effects of
strategic alliance membership on the disadvantages of
electronic-commerce adoption: a comparative study of Swedish and
Australian regional small businesses', Journal of Global
Information Management, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1-18.
MacGregor, R.C. and Vrazalic, L. (2006) 'E-commerce adoption
barriers in small businesses and the differential effects of
gender', Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, vol. 4,
no. 2, pp. 1-24.
MacKay, N., Parent, M. and Gemino, A. (2004) 'A model of
electronic commerce adoption by small voluntary organizations',
European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 147-59.
Martin, L.M. (2005) 'Internet adoption and use in small firms:
internal processes, organisational culture and the roles of the
owner-manager and key staff', New Technology, Work and Employment,
vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 190-204.
Martin, L.M. and Matlay, H. (2003) 'Innovative use of the
Internet in established small firms: the impact of knowledge management
and organisational learning in accessing new opportunities',
Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, vol. 6, no. 1,
pp. 18-26.
Matlay, H. and Addis, M. (2003) 'Adoption of ICT and
e-commerce in small businesses: an HEI-based consultancy
perspective', Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development,
vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 321-35.
McGovern, T. and Hicks, C. (2004) 'How political processes
shaped the IT adopted by a small make-to-order company: a case study in
the insulated wire and cable industry', Information &
Management, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 243-57.
McGrath, L.C., Lomerson, W.L. and Schwager, P.H. (2006)
'Integration of e-business into small and medium size
businesses', International Journal of Applied Management and
Technology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 112-24.
Mohan-Neill, S. (2006) 'An analysis of factors which influence
small businesses' decision to have a website and to conduct online
selling', Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, vol.
8, no. 2, pp. 204-9.
Mohd Salleh, N.A., Rohde, F. and Green, P. (2006) 'The effect
of enacted capabilities on adoption of a government electronic
procurement system by Malaysian SMEs', Electronic Markets, vol. 16,
no. 4, pp. 292-311.
Morgan, A., Colebourne, D. and Thomas, B. (2006) 'The
development of ICT advisors for SME businesses: an innovative
approach', Technovation, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 980-7.
Mutula, S.M. and van Brakel, P. (2006) 'E-readiness of SMEs in
the ICT sector in Botswana with respect to information access', The
Electronic Library, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 402-17.
Paper, D., Pedersen, E. and Mulbery, K. (2003) 'An e-commerce
process model: perspectives from e-commerce entrepreneurs', Journal
of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 28-47.
Pflughoeft, K.A., Ramamurthy, K., Soofi, E.S., Yasai-Ardekani, M.
and Zahedi, F. (2003) 'Multiple conceptualizations of small
business web use and benefit', Decision Sciences, vol. 34, no. 3,
pp. 467-512.
Piscitello, L. and Sgobbi, F. (2003) 'SMEs in the new
economy--evidence from the selected Italian districts', Competition
& Change, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 61-78.
Piscitello, L. and Sgobbi, F. (2004) 'Globalisation,
e-business and SMEs: evidence from the Italian district of Prato',
Small Business Economics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 333-47.
Premkumar, G. (2003) 'A meta-analysis of research on
information technology implementation in small business', Journal
of Organizational Computing & Electronic Commerce, vol. 13, no. 2,
pp. 91-121.
Putterill, L.G. (2004) 'The e-commerce race for Wales: another
Aesop's fable?' Journal of Small Business and Enterprise
Development, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 382-9.
Ramsey, E., Ibbotson, P., Bell, J. and Gray, B. (2003)
'E-opportunities of service sector SMEs: an Irish cross-border
study', Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, vol.
10, no. 3, pp. 250-64.
Ramsey, E. and McCole, P. (2005) 'E-business in professional
SMEs: the case of New Zealand', Journal of Small Business and
Enterprise Development, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 528-44.
Rao, S.S., Metts, G. and Monge, C.A.M. (2003) 'Electronic
commerce development in small and medium sized enterprises: a stage
model and its implications', Business Process Management Journal,
vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 11-32.
Ray, A.W. and Ray, J.J. (2006) 'Strategic benefits to SMEs
from third party web services: an action research analysis', The
Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 273-91.
Raymond, L., Bergeron, F. and Blili, S. (2005) 'The
assimilation of e-business in manufacturing SMEs: determinants and
effects on growth and internationalization', Electronic Markets,
vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 106-18.
Riemenschneider, C.K., Harrison, D.A. and Mykytyn Jr, P.P. (2003)
'Understanding IT adoption decisions in small business: integrating
current theories', Information & Management, vol. 40, no. 4,
pp. 269-85.
Ritchie, B. and Brindley, C. (2005) 'ICT adoption by SMEs:
implications for relationships and management', New Technology,
Work and Employment, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 205-17.
Rivard, S., Raymond, L. and Verreault, D. (2006)
'Resource-based view and competitive strategy: an integrated model
of the contribution of information technology to firm performance',
The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 29-50.
Rogers, E.M. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edition, Free
Press, New York.
Santarelli, E. and D'Altri, S. (2003) 'The diffusion of
e-commerce among SMEs: theoretical implications and empirical
evidence', Small Business Economics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 273-83.
Schlenker, L. and Crocker, N. (2003) 'Building an e-business
scenario for small business: the IBM SME gateway project',
Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, vol. 6, no. 1,
pp. 7-17.
Sellitto, C., Wenn, A. and Burgess, S. (2003) 'A review of the
web sites of small Australian wineries: motivations, goals and
success', Information Technology and Management, vol. 4, no. 2/3,
pp. 215-32.
Seyal, A.H., Awais, M.M., Shamail, S. and Abbas, A. (2004)
'Determinants of electronic commerce in Pakistan: preliminary
evidence from small and medium enterprises', Electronic Markets,
vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 372-87.
Sharma, M.K. and Bhagwat, R. (2006a) 'Performance measurements
in the implementation of information systems in small and medium-sized
enterprises: a framework and empirical analysis', Measuring
Business Excellence, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 8-21.
Sharma, M.K. and Bhagwat, R. (2006b) 'Practice of information
systems: evidence from select Indian SMEs', Journal of
Manufacturing Technology Management, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 199-223.
Shiels, H., McIvor, R. and O'Reilly, D. (2003)
'Understanding the implications of ICT adoption: insights from
SMEs', Logistics Information Management, vol. 16, no. 5, pp.
312-26.
Shin, I. (2006) 'Adoption of enterprise application software
and firm performance', Small Business Economics, vol. 26, no. 3,
pp. 241-56.
Simpson, M. and Docherty, A.J. (2004) 'E-commerce adoption
support and advice for UK SMEs', Journal of Small Business and
Enterprise Development, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 315-28.
Soto-Acosta, P. and Merono-Cerdan, A.L. (2006) 'An analysis
and comparison of web development between local governments and SMEs in
Spain', International Journal of Electronic Business, vol. 4, no.
2, pp. 191-203.
Spurge, V. and Roberts, C. (2005) 'Broadband technology: an
appraisal of government policy and use by small- and medium-sized
enterprises', Journal of Property Investment & Finance, vol.
23, no. 6, pp. 516-24.
Stansfield, M. and Grant, K. (2003) 'An investigation into
issues influencing the use of the Internet and electronic commerce among
small-medium sized enterprises', Journal of Electronic Commerce
Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 15-33.
Stockdale, R. and Standing, C. (2004) 'Benefits and barriers
of electronic marketplace participation: an SME perspective',
Journal of Enterprise Information Management, vol. 17, no. 4, pp.
301-11.
Tan, Z. and Ouyang, W. (2004) 'Diffusion and impacts of the
internet and e-commerce in China', Electronic Markets, vol. 14, no.
1, pp. 25-35.
Taylor, M. and Murphy, A. (2004) 'SMEs and e-business',
Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, vol. 11, no. 3,
pp. 280-9.
Teo, T.L., Chan, C. and Parker, C.M. (2004) 'Factors affecting
e-commerce adoption by SMEs: a meta-analysis', 15th Australasian
Conference on Information Systems, 1-3 December, Hobart, Australia.
Thomas, B., Packham, G., Miller, C. and Brooksbank, D. (2004)
'The use of Web sites for SME innovation and technology support
services in Wales', Journal of Small Business and Enterprise
Development, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 400-7.
Tsao, H.-Y., Lin, K.H.C. and Lin, C. (2004) 'An investigation
of critical success factors in the adoption of B2BEC by Taiwanese
companies', Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge,
vol. 5, no. 1/2, pp. 198-202.
Tse, T. and Soufani, K. (2003) 'Business strategies for small
firms in the new economy', Journal of Small Business and Enterprise
Development, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 306-20.
Tucker, D. and Lafferty, A. (2004) 'Implementing electronic
commerce in SMEs: processes and barriers', Journal of Electronic
Commerce in Organizations, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 20-9.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003)
'User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified
view', MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425-78.
Wagner, B.A., Fillis, I. and Johansson, U. (2003) 'E-business
and e-supply strategy in small and medium sized businesses (SMEs)',
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, pp.
343-54.
Warren, M. (2004) 'Farmers online: drivers and impediments in
adoption of Internet in UK agricultural businesses', Journal of
Small Business and Enterprise Development, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 371-81.
Webster, B., Walker, E. and Barrett, R. (2005) 'Small business
and online training in Australia: who is willing to participate?'
New Technology, Work and Employment, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 248-58.
Wong, K.Y. and Aspinwall, E. (2005) 'An empirical study of the
important factors for knowledge-management adoption in the SME
sector', Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 64-82.
Wymer, S. and Regan, E. (2005) 'Factors influencing e-commerce
adoption and use by small and medium businesses', Electronic
Markets, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 438-53.
Wynarczyk, P. (2005) 'The impact of connectivity technologies
on e-flexible working practices of small and medium-sized enterprises in
the North East of England', New Technology, Work and Employment,
vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 234-47.
Yeung, J.H.Y., Shim, J.P. and Lai, A.Y.K. (2003) 'Current
progress of e-commerce adoption: small and medium enterprises in Hong
Kong', Communications of the ACM, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 226-32.
Zafiropoulos, C., Vrana, V. and Paschaloudis, D. (2006) 'The
internet practices of hotel companies: an analysis from Greece',
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, vol. 18,
no. 2, pp. 156-63.
Zheng, J., Caldwell, N., Harland, C., Powell, P., Woerndl, M. and
Xu, S. (2004) 'Small firms and e-business: cautiousness,
contingency and cost-benefit', Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 27-39.
Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. and Xu, S. (2003) 'Electronic business
adoption by European firms: a cross-country assessment of the
facilitators and inhibitors', European Journal of Information
Systems, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 251-68.
8 Biographies
Craig Parker is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Information
Systems at Deakin University, Australia. Dr Parker was foundation
Director of the Master of Electronic Commerce at Deakin University, and
continues to teach postgraduate students in the area of eBusiness. He is
co-editor of the Journal of Information Systems and Small Business and
Associated Editor for the Journal of Electronic Commerce in
Organizations. He has spent over a decade conducting research on
interactive business simulation approaches to teaching eBusiness, and on
small business use of eBusiness. He also conducts research and
supervises student research projects in the areas of eBusiness adoption
by small firms. He has published and presented his research widely in
national and international venues. He is a member of editorial boards
for several leading international journals.
Tanya Castleman is Professor of Information Systems and Head of the
Deakin Business School. Her research concentrates on the social and
organisational aspects of eBusiness. She has investigated the social and
organisational dynamics of companies and their relationship to eBusiness
design, adoption and use. Her research examines these issues in both
large and small organisations as well as in supply chains and virtual
networks. In addition to her academic research which is internationally
recognised, Tanya has conducted research consultancies on a range of
eBusiness topics.
Craig M. Parker *
School of Information Systems, Deakin University
221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria, 2135, Australia
Email: craig.parker@deakin.edu.au
Tanya Castleman
Deakin Business School, Deakin University
221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria, 2135, Australia
Email: tanya.castleman@deakin.edu.au
* Corresponding author
Table 1: Summary of journal articles identified
Journal name '03 '04 '05
Australasian Journal of Information Systems (AJIS)
Business Process Management Journal (BPMJ) 1
Competition & Change (C&C) 1
Communications of the ACM (CACM) 1
Decision Sciences (DS) 1
Electronic Journal of Information Systems in
Developing Countries (EJISDC)
The Electronic Library
Electronic Markets (EM) 1 2 7
Engineering Construction & Architectural 1
Management (EC&AM)
European Business Review (EBR) 1
European Journal of Information Systems (EJIS) 3 2 1
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (ITEM)
Info 1
Information & Management (I&M) 1 3 1
Information Systems Frontiers (ISF) 1
Information Technology & Management (IT&M) 1
Irish Journal of Management (IJM) 1
International Journal of Applied Management and
Technology (IJAMT)
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality
Management (IJCHM)
International Journal of Electronic
Business (IJEB)
International Journal of Information
Management (IJIM)
International Journal of Retail & Distribution
Management (IJR&DM)
International Marketing Review (IMR) 1
International Small Business Journal (ISBJ) 2
Internet Research (IR)
Journal of American Academy of Business, 2
Cambridge (JAAB)
Journal of Computer Information Systems (JCIS) 2 1
Journal of Electronic Commerce in 1 2
Organizations (JECO)
Journal of Electronic Commerce Research (JECR) 1 1
Journal of Enterprise Information 1 1
Management (JEIM)
Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM) 3
Journal of Internet Commerce (JIC) 1
Journal of Information Technology
Management (JITM)
Journal of Knowledge Management (JKM) 1
Journal of Manufacturing Technology
Management (JMTM)
Journal of Marketing Management (JMM) 1
Journal of Organizational Computing & Electronic 2
Commerce (JOC&EC)
Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management (JP&SM) 1
Journal of Property Investment & Finance (JPI&F) 1
Journal of Systems & Information 4
Technology (JS&IT)
Journal of Small Business & Enterprise 8 9 2
Development (JSBED)
Journal of Small Business Management (JSBM) 1
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic
Commerce Research (JTAECR)
The Journal of Strategic Information
Systems (JSIS)
Logistics Information Management (LIM) 1
Management Decision (MD) 1
Measuring Business Excellence (MBE)
New Technology, Work & Employment (NTW&E) 5
Production Planning & Control (PP&C) 1
Qualitative Market Research (QMR) 2
South African Journal of Business 1
Management (SAJBM)
Small Business Economics (SBE) 1 3
Supply Chain Management (SCM) 1
TOTAL 34 33 29
Journal name '06 Total
Australasian Journal of Information Systems (AJIS) 1 1
Business Process Management Journal (BPMJ) 1
Competition & Change (C&C) 1
Communications of the ACM (CACM) 1
Decision Sciences (DS) 1
Electronic Journal of Information Systems in 1 1
Developing Countries (EJISDC)
The Electronic Library 1 1
Electronic Markets (EM) 2 12
Engineering Construction & Architectural 1
Management (EC&AM)
European Business Review (EBR) 1
European Journal of Information Systems (EJIS) 6
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (ITEM) 1 1
Info 1
Information & Management (I&M) 5
Information Systems Frontiers (ISF) 1
Information Technology & Management (IT&M) 1
Irish Journal of Management (IJM) 1
International Journal of Applied Management and 1 1
Technology (IJAMT)
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality 1 1
Management (IJCHM)
International Journal of Electronic 1 1
Business (IJEB)
International Journal of Information 1 1
Management (IJIM)
International Journal of Retail & Distribution 1 1
Management (IJR&DM)
International Marketing Review (IMR) 1
International Small Business Journal (ISBJ) 2
Internet Research (IR) 1 1
Journal of American Academy of Business, 1 3
Cambridge (JAAB)
Journal of Computer Information Systems (JCIS) 3
Journal of Electronic Commerce in 3 6
Organizations (JECO)
Journal of Electronic Commerce Research (JECR) 2
Journal of Enterprise Information 1 3
Management (JEIM)
Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM) 3
Journal of Internet Commerce (JIC) 1
Journal of Information Technology 1 1
Management (JITM)
Journal of Knowledge Management (JKM) 1
Journal of Manufacturing Technology 1 1
Management (JMTM)
Journal of Marketing Management (JMM) 1
Journal of Organizational Computing & Electronic 2
Commerce (JOC&EC)
Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management (JP&SM) 1
Journal of Property Investment & Finance (JPI&F) 1
Journal of Systems & Information 4
Technology (JS&IT)
Journal of Small Business & Enterprise 19
Development (JSBED)
Journal of Small Business Management (JSBM) 1
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic 1 1
Commerce Research (JTAECR)
The Journal of Strategic Information 2 2
Systems (JSIS)
Logistics Information Management (LIM) 1
Management Decision (MD) 1
Measuring Business Excellence (MBE) 1 1
New Technology, Work & Employment (NTW&E) 5
Production Planning & Control (PP&C) 1
Qualitative Market Research (QMR) 2
South African Journal of Business 1
Management (SAJBM)
Small Business Economics (SBE) 1 5
Supply Chain Management (SCM) 1
TOTAL 24 120
Table 2: Summary of data collection approaches employed
Data collection approach(es) '03 '04 '05 '06 Total
Conceptual / literature review only 2 4 1 7
Qualitative only data collection
Semi-structured interviews 5 5 3 13
Semi-structured interviews 1 1
(longitudinal)
Case studies 9 5 3 2 19
Case study (longitudinal) 1 1
Action research (longitudinal) 1 1 1 3
Case studies and semi-structured 1 1
interviews
Focus groups and semi-structured 1 1
interviews
Quantitative only data collection
Postal/email survey 9 13 16 10 48
Postal/email survey (longitudinal) 1 1
Phone survey 1 2 3
Website survey 1 1
Website survey (longitudinal) 1 1
Postal/email survey and website 1 1
survey
Combined qualitative and
quantitative data collection
Focus group and website survey 1 1
Postal/email survey and case 2 2
studies
Postal/email survey, website 1 1
survey and case study
Postal/email survey and 3 2 2 3 10
semi-structured interviews
Postal/email survey and 1 1 2
semi-structured interviews
(longitudinal)
Phone survey and semi-structured 1 1 2
interviews
Website survey and semi-structured 1 1
interviews
Total 34 33 29 24 120
Table 3: Summary of eBusiness technologies and applications
investigated
eBusiness technologies
and applications '03 '04 '05 '06 Total
Conceptual / theoretical papers 2 4 1 7
eBusiness technologies unclear 2 2 3 1 8
or unspecified (eBusiness
generally)
Web generally 8 15 6 3 32
Web generally plus email 2 6 8
Internet generally 1 1 1 2 5
Internet use generally plus 1 1
mobile phone
Many eBusiness technologies and 12 6 4 7 29
applications (eg, research,
sales, CRM)
Many eBusiness technologies 4 2 4 1 11
plus EDI
Focus on supply chain 2 2 2 6
technologies (plus possibly
other technologies)
Knowledge/information management 1 2 1 4
(plus possibly other
technologies)
Third-party web services 1 1
Electronic marketplaces 2 1 3
eProcurement with government 1 1
Teleworking 2 2
Broadband Internet 1 1
Online training 1 1
Total 34 33 29 24 120
Table 4: Summary of countries studied
Country/ies studied '03 '04 '05 '06 Total
Unclear 1 1
Not applicable (conceptual / 2 4 1 7
theoretical papers)
Single Countries
United Kingdom 6 10 6 3 25
USA 5 5 4 3 17
Australia 4 1 4 1 10
Canada 1 2 2 5
New Zealand 1 1 2 1 5
Sweden 2 2 1 5
Ireland 4 4
Italy 2 2 4
Scotland 2 2 4
Hong Kong 1 2 1 4
South Africa 1 1 1 3
India 2 2
Malaysia 2 2
Spain 2 2
Taiwan 1 1 2
Turkey 1 1 2
Botswana 1 1
Chile 1 1
Greece 1 1
Indonesia 1 1
Korea 1 1
Pakistan 1 1
Portugal 1 1
Two Countries
Australia and Sweden 2 2
Australia and Germany 1 1
Canada and USA 1 1
Four Countries
USA, Germany, Denmark and France 2 2
USA, UK, Austria and Spain 1 1
Eight Countries
UK, Ireland, Finland, Germany, 1 1
Denmark, France, Italy, Spain
Ten Countries
Brazil, China, Denmark, France, 1 1
Germany, Japan, Mexico,
Singapore,
Taiwan, USA
Total 34 33 29 24 100
Table 5: Summary of research objectives
Category Description Total
Extent of Examining the extent of SME adoption of 7
eBusiness use various eBusiness technologies and
applications. In some cases, the articles
also looked at specific factors such as
firm characteristics which influenced this
adoption (de Klerk & Kroon 2005; Egan et
al. 2003; Fry et al. 2004; Koh & Maguire
2004; Kula & Tatoglu 2003; Wynarczyk 2005)
and the use of eBusiness for addressing
the information needs of SMEs (Mutula &
van Brakel 2006).
eBusiness Identifying the (strategic) benefits 15
benefits / uses and/or uses of eBusiness technologies and
applications by SMEs and, in some cases,
the specific adoption factors or barriers
affecting these benefits/uses (Beck et
al. 2005a; Beck et al. 2005b; Chau 2003;
Karanasios & Burgess 2006; Kyobe 2004;
Levenburg 2005; MacGregor 2004b;
Mohan-Neill 2006; Pflughoeft et al. 2003;
Santarelli & D'Altri 2003; Schlenker &
Crocker 2003; Sellitto et al. 2003; Sharma
& Bhagwat 2006b; Stansfield & Grant 2003;
Yeung et al. 2003).
eBusiness Identifying the range of drivers 33
drivers / (referred to in some articles as critical
barriers success factors) of and/or barriers to
eBusiness adoption/use by SMEs (Al-Qirim
2003; 2005; 2006; Beach 2004; Ching &
Ellis 2004; Chong 2006; Del Aguila-Obra
& Padilla-Melendez 2006; Fillis et al.
2003; Fisher & Craig 2005; Galloway &
Mochrie 2005; Gengatharen & Standing 2005;
Hicks et al. 2006; Hughes et al. 2003;
Jones et al. 2003b; Kaynak et al. 2005;
Khazanchi 2005; Lawson et al. 2003;
Lee 2004; MacGregor & Vrazalic 2005a;
MacGregor & Vrazalic 2006; Ramsey et
al. 2003; Ramsey & McCole 2005; Rao et
al. 2003; Stockdale & Standing 2004;
Tan & Ouyang 2004; Taylor & Murphy 2004;
Tsao et al. 2004; Wagner et al. 2003;
Warren 2004; Wong & Aspinwall 2005; Wymer
& Regan 2005; Zheng et al. 2004) or the
success factors for pure online SMEs
based on lessons learned from successful
dot-coms (Barnes et al. 2004).
eBusiness Comparing perceived eBusiness barriers 3
barriers / against whether SMEs participate in
drivers and strategic alliances (MacGregor 2003;
their impact MacGregor & Vrazalic 2005b), examining
on B2B the impact of website content features
relationships / (along with other factors such as trust)
networking / on B2B eCommerce among SMEs (Lawson-Body
alliances & O'Keefe 2006), or looking at factors
including eBusiness use which impact on
SME owner/manager decisions to
participate in formal networking
arrangements (MacGregor 2004a).
Adoption Exploring of a subset of adoption factors 22
factor subset (and in some cases the relationships
between these factors) and their impact
on the adoption of eBusiness technologies
(Burke 2005; Clear & Dickson 2005;
Dholakia & Kshetri 2004; Gemino et al.
2006; Grandon & Mykytyn Jr 2004; Grandon
& Pearson 2004; Houghton & Winklhofer
2004; Khalifa & Davison 2006; Lee &
Cheung 2004; Lucchetti & Sterlacchini
2004; MacKay et al. 2004; Martin 2005;
Mohd Salleh et al. 2006; Piscitello &
Sgobbi 2003; 2004; Premkumar 2003;
Riemenschneider et al. 2003; Ritchie &
Seyal et al. 2004; Spurge & Roberts 2005;
Webster et al. 2005; Zhu et al. 2003).
Adoption Examining a subset of adoption factors 4
factor impact on and their impact on the success of
implementation / eBusiness implementations (Caldeira &
performance Ward 2003; de Guinea et al. 2005) or on
the business performance of SMEs (Auger
2005; Shin 2006).
eBusiness Examining a subset of adoption factors 6
integration / (and in some cases the relationships
business between these factors) and their impact
transformation on the extent of eBusiness-enabled
integration and/or business
transformation (Daniel 2003; Kettinger &
Hackbarth 2004; Lin & Lee 2005; Raymond
et al. 2005), or categorising SMEs in
terms of the extent of eBusiness
integration against eBusiness
sophistication (McGrath et al. 2006;
Shiels et al. 2003).
eBusiness Exploring the complex interrelationships 13
strategy between business strategy, eBusiness
strategy and firm performance
(Karagozoglu & Lindell 2004; Locke 2004;
Ray & Ray 2006; Rivard et al. 2006; Tse
& Soufani 2003) (in some cases proposing
models or reporting on the evolution of
how eBusiness strategies are formed in
SMEs (Alexander et al. 2003; Ashworth et
al. 2006; Jones et al. 2003a; Kartiwi
2006; Paper et al. 2003; Tucker &
Lafferty 2004), or a subset of adoption
factors and their impact on how (if at
all) eBusiness is used strategically by
SMEs (Levy & Powell 2003; Martin & Matlay
2003).
eBusiness Investigating the approaches to eBusiness 3
investment investment evaluation and justification
justification (Love & Irani 2004) or the benefits,
costs and/or risks of eBusiness
investment by SMEs (Love et al. 2005;
Sharma & Bhagwat 2006a).
Website content Examining the extent of changes which 3
analyses occur to SME websites over time (Alonso
Mendo & Fitzgerald 2005) or the
information features of SME websites
(Soto-Acosta & Merono-Cerdan 2006;
Zafiropoulos et al. 2006).
Government Arguing why the tendencies of government 1
eBusiness to use purely statistical measures of SME
adoption eBusiness adoption is inappropriate given
measures the heterogeneous nature of SMEs
(Putterill 2004).
Knowledge Exploring co-opetition among SMEs, issues 1
sharing and regarding knowledge sharing and the role
co-opetition of eBusiness for managing knowledge (Levy
et al. 2003).
Role of external Examining the role and potential impact 8
parties on of external parties such as
eBusiness government-funded eBusiness advisors,
adoption consultants, vendors and intermediaries
on SME eBusiness adoption (Beckinsale
et al. 2006; Brown & Lockett 2004;
Simpson & Docherty 2004), interactions
with trading partners, industry
associations, vendors, etc and their
impact on eBusiness use (Fink & Disterer
2006), or the effects of interventions
initiated by researchers to improve
eBusiness adoption by SMEs, such as
providing eBusiness consulting (Ihlstrom
& Nilsson 2003; Matlay & Addis 2003;
McGovern & Hicks 2004) and developing
educational resources (Hari et al. 2005).