Determinants of bank selection in Delhi: a factor analysis.
Rao, A. Sajeevan ; Sharma, R.K.
Introduction
In India, the growth of banking industry was very slow and banks
also experienced periodic failures between 1913 and 1948. There were
approximately 1100 banks, mostly small. To streamline the functioning
and activities of commercial banks, the Government of India came up with
The Banking Companies Act, 1949 which was later changed to Banking
Regulation Act, 1949, as per amending Act of 1965 (Act No. 23 of 1965).
Reserve Bank of India was vested with extensive powers for the
supervision of banking in India as the Central Banking Authority.
During those days, public had lesser confidence in the banks. As a
result deposit mobilization was slow. Earlier, savings bank facility
provided by the postal department was comparatively safer. Moreover,
funds were largely given to traders.
Government took major steps in the Indian banking sector reform
after independence. In 1955, it nationalized the Imperial Bank of India with extensive banking facilities on a large scale especially in rural
and semi-urban areas. It formed the State Bank of India to act as the
principal agent of RBI and to handle banking transactions of the Union
and state governments all over the country. Seven banks forming
subsidiary of State Bank of India was nationalized in 1960 on 19th July.
In 1969, major process of nationalization was carried out. It was the
effort of the then Prime Minister of India, Mrs. Indira Gandhi. Fourteen
major commercial banks in the country were nationalized. Second phase of
nationalization of Indian Banking Sector Reform was carried out in 1980
with seven more banks. This step brought 80 per cent of the banking
segment in India under government ownership.
Major development, occurred in 1991, under the chairmanship of M.
Narasimham Rao, when a committee was set up in his name which worked for
the liberalization of banking practices. The country got flooded with
foreign banks and their ATM stations. Efforts started being put to give
a satisfactory service to customers. Phone banking and net banking were
introduced. The entire system became more convenient and swift. Time
became more important than money.
With years, banks also started customizing themselves. The Indian
banking industry is now passing through a phase of customers'
market. Customers have more options in choosing their banks. A
competition has been established within the banks operating in India.
With stiff competition and advancement of technology, the services
provided by banks have become more easy and convenient.
In this paper, the researchers have tried to study the attributes a
bank has to provide in Indian scenario, or in other words an assessment
is made about the variables that attract a customer to choose the
services of a particular bank.
Literature Review
A study conducted by Erdener Kaynak, and, Talha D. Harcar (2005)
revealed that banks were evaluated more positively by customers in areas
such as extra services offered by the bank, image of the bank, and
convenience of the bank. James F. Devlin and Philip Gerrard (2004)
presented an analysis of trends in the relative importance of choice
criteria in respect of selecting a retail bank. They pointed out that
the influence of recommendations has increased significantly and is now
the most important choice criterion. Other factors which have also
increased in importance are the offering of incentives, having a wide
product range, and economic factors such as interest rate paid and fees
and charges levied. Locational factors, such as choosing a bank close to
home or workplace, have decreased significantly in importance in
motivating choice. Certain criteria have remained broadly constant
through time. Amongst them, and perhaps surprisingly, is choosing on the
basis of a bank's image and reputation and expectations about level
of service.
Ron Shevlin and Catherine Graeber (2001) explored the various
factors that influence a customer in choosing a particular bank. They
pointed out that ATM (Automated Teller Machine) was the primary reason
for a customers' choice for a bank and further branch visit and
referral from friends and relatives were most prevalent sources of
influence in Texas, USA. Findings of Mohammed Almossawi (2001) reveal
that the chief factors determining college students' bank selection
are: bank's reputation, availability of parking space near the
bank, friendliness of bank personnel, and availability and location of
automated teller machines (ATM). Findings of Huu Phuong Ta, Kar Yir Har
(2000) indicate that undergraduates place a great emphasis on the
pricing and product dimensions of bank services. The results are of
interest to bank managers because they provide information on the
importance of the selection criteria as well as areas of strengths and
weaknesses of banks. Burc Ulengin's (1998) findings conclude that
respondents prefer the extended loyalty programmes, the continuous
information flow from the bank, the offsite ATMs, the maximum
five-minute of waiting time in the branches, and a simple application
for all the accounts the bank offers. Carolyn Kennington, Jeanne Hill,
and Anna Rakowska (1996) point out that the most important variables
influencing customer choice are reputation price and service. Josee
Bloemer, Kode Ruyter, and Pascel Peter (1998) investigate how image,
perceived service quality, and satisfaction determine loyalty in retail
banking. The key findings by Laroche, Rosenblatt, and Manning (1986) on
diverse demographic segments include importance of location convenience,
speed of service, competence, and friendliness of bank employees. Meidan
(1976) reveals that about 90 per cent of the respondents bank at the
branch nearest to there home and place of work. Convenience, in terms of
location, is also found to be the single most important factor for
selecting a bank.
Objectives of the study
The paper attempts to identify the various factors that affect the
choice of customer in choosing a bank, namely, ATM facility,
friendliness of employees, debit card facility, loan facility, parking
facility, speed of services, loyalty programme, internet banking
facility, rate of Interest, bank timing, convenient display of counters,
free home delivery of drafts, phone banking facility, minimum account
balance and bank charges, overdraft facility, brand name, nearness to
home or workplace, security arrangement, locker facility, Demat
facility, referral from friends and relatives, computerization of the
bank, continuous flow of information from bank, and simple application
for all transactions.
A statistical approach--Factor Analysis--has been used for the
study. Finally, practical implications concerning the customers'
choice of bank have been highlighted.
Methodology and Data Collection
For the purpose of the study primary data were collected from the
account holder of two nationalized banks, namely State Bank of India,
and Punjab National bank, and two private banks, namely ICICI and
Standard Chartered Bank in central Delhi area with the help of a
well-drafted questionnaire. A sample of 100 respondents was selected by
following the non-probabilistic convenience sampling, as it is
appropriate for exploratory studies. Further, convenience sampling
method was used for two reasons, firstly, respondents are selected
because they happen to be in, right place at the right time and
secondly, convenience sampling technique is not recommended for
descriptive or casual research but they can be in exploratory research for generating ideas (Malhotra 2005). According to the chosen
methodological research approach, the quantitative data were analyzed by
using factor analysis with SPSS Software 10.1 version. The survey was
conducted during the period of February to April 2006.
Previous studies on banking as well as theories of consumer
behaviour have shown demographics to be a factor, influencing the
adoption of technology-based product and services.
The demographic characteristics of the respondents depict that the
majority of the respondents (51 per cent) were students followed by
service class people (36 per cent), and the remaining (13 per cent) were
business class. It was further revealed that 52 per cent of the
respondents were male and 48 per cent female.
Factor Analysis
Factor analysis is a data reduction statistical technique that
allows simplifying the correlational relationships between a number of
continuous variables. Exploratory factor analysis is used in order to
identify constructs and investigate relationships among key interval
scaled questions regarding reasons for choosing a bank's services
from 100 respondents. To test, the following steps were taken:
* The correlation matrices were computed. It revealed that there is
enough correlation to go ahead for factor analysis.
* Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy (MSA) for
individual variance was studied. It found sufficient correlation for all
the variables (Table 1).
* To test the sampling adequacy, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin MSA was
computed and found to be 0.592. It indicates that that the sample is
good enough far sampling.
* The overall significance of correlation matrices was tested with
Barlett Test of Sphericity providing support for the validity of the
factor analysis of the data set. (Table 1).
After the standards indicated that the data are suitable for factor
analysis, Principal Components Analysis was employed for extracting the
data, which allowed determining the factor underlying the relationship
between a number of variables. The Total Variable Explained suggests
that it extracts one factor accounts for 68.8 per cent of the variance
of the relationship between variables (Table 3).
Loading on factors can be positive or negative. A negative loading
indicates that this variable has an inverse relationship with the rest
of the factors. The higher the loading the more important the factor.
However, Comrey (1973: 1346) suggested that anything above 0.44 could be
considered salient, with increased loading becoming more vital in
determining the factor. All the loadings in the research are positive
(Table 2).
Rotation is necessary when extraction technique suggests that there
are two or more factors. The rotation of factors is designed to give an
idea of how the factors initially extracted differ from each other and
to provide a clear picture of which item loads on which factor.
There are only eight factors, each having Eigen value exceeding 1
for mobile banking drivers. The Eigen values for eight factors were
5.289, 2.683, 2.231, 1.757, 1.518, 1.345, 1.242, and 1.142 respectively
(Table 3). The percentage of total variance is used as an index to
determine how well the total factor solution accounts for what the
variables together represent. The index for present solution accounts
for 68.824 per cent of the total variations for choosing a bank's
services. It is pretty good extraction as it can economize on the number
of factors (from twenty-five it has reduced to eight factors) while we
have lost 31.176 per cent information content for factors in choosing a
bank. The percentage of variance explained by factor one to eight for
factors effecting in choosing a bank are 21.157, 10.733, 8.932, 7.027,
6.070, 5.379, 4.968, and 4.568 respectively (Table 3). Table 2 tells us
that after eight factors are extracted and retained, the communality is
0.669 for variable 1, 0.771 for variable 2, and so on. It means that 67
per cent of the variance of variable 1 is being captured by the eight
extracted factors together. The proportion of variance in any one of the
original variables, which is being captured by the extracted factor, is
known as communality (Nargundkar 2002).
Large communalities indicate that a large number of variance has
been accounted for by the factor solution. Varimax rotated factor
analytic results for factor influencing the choice of a bank is shown in
Table 4.
The eight factors shown in Table 4 have been discussed below:
Factor 1: Customization
It is the most vital factor, which explains 21.15 per cent of the
variation. Customization factors such as speed in services (0.712),
convenient display of counters (0.716), continuous flow of information
(0.787), rate of interest (0.0694), emerge with good positive
correlations. This yields a great influence while choosing a banking
service.
Factor 2: Convenience
There are three loads to this factor. The factor
'Accessibility' is the second important factor, which accounts
for nearly 10.73 per cent of the variations. The factors Internet
banking facility (0.654), free delivery of demand draft (0.819), and
phone banking (0.804) signify that consumers want convenience in banking
and they want to save time.
Factor 3: Value-added Services
This factor has two significant variables which have 8.92 per cent
of the variation, and this comprises two loadings depicting the
value-added services required by the consumers. The factor loading of
0.809 and 0.750 representing locker facility and Demat account respectively show that value-added services are also a significant
factor in choosing a bank.
Factor 4: Accessibility
The next important factor, which carry a loading of 7.03 per cent
of the variation comprises two loadings--debit card facility, and ATM
facility--with rotated value of 0.818 and 0.796, signifying that easy
accessibility to their bank accounts is a vital factor in choosing a
bank.
Factor 5: Generalization
Generalization is the next factor, which influences a consumer in
choosing a bank and has 6.07 per cent of the variation. This factor has
three loadings, namely simple application for all the accounts (0.797),
continuous flow of information from the bank (0.537), and overdraft
(0.525).
Factor 6: Transaction cost
The factor 'Transaction cost' is the next important
factor, which accounts for nearly 5.38 per cent of the variations. There
is only one load to this factor. The factor Bank charges (0.816)
signifies that bank charges are also the vital factor in choosing a
particular bank.
Factor 7: Brand name
This factor has three significant loads, which has 4.96 per cent of
the variation, and this comprises of three loadings depicting the brand
name preferred by the consumers. The factor loading of 0.716, 0.703, and
0.508 representing brand name, centralization of accounts, and minimum
balance account respectively show that brand name is also a significant
factor in choosing a bank.
Factor 8: Reliability
This last factor has two loads, which has 4.56 per cent of the
variation and this comprises loan facility (0.702) and security
arrangements in the bank (0.720). This shows consumers expect the bank
to be more reliable.
Conclusion and Implications
To increase the clientele and business volume banks had to set up
many kinds of hi-tech services such as ATM, phone banking, internet
banking, computerization, and so on. In turn the banks have to
understand the customer needs so as to take care of its customers'
satisfaction. It is clear from the research conducted that banks need to
provide tailor-made service for it customers. In today's era
customers require more and more personalized and value-added services
like ATM, e-banking, phone banking, etc. All these factors imply that
they do not want to spend their valuable time waiting for their turn in
a queue. Customers' also want that banks should improve upon the
display of counters which again implies that customers' want speed
in services. Apart from this customers' also want easy access to
their accounts and want that there should be less paper work. Bankers
should also provide that kind of service where they charge nominal fee
for the transactions, better rate of interest, and low minimum balance
so as to increase the number of clientele. Bankers should also try to
build good brand image, as many of the respondents prefer to have
accounts in renowned banks. Security arrangement should also be good so
that customers' can be assured of safety of their money. Another
factor which influences a customer to choose a bank is dependability,
which implies how much a customer can depend on a bank for a services
e.g. loan facility. Bankers have to keep in mind that customers' do
not open an account only for saving money but also want other services
like locker facility, car loan, personal loan, home loan etc.
Scope for further Research
As the survey conducted was only confined to Delhi region results
may vary if research is in conducted in other parts of India. If the
survey is conducted all over India, the result may substantially differ.
Research conducted in an urban area may not yield the same result if the
survey is conducted in a rural area. The main limitation of the survey
was that more of student and service-class respondents constituted the
demography and the business-class respondents were less in number. So if
more of business-class respondents are considered the result might
differ.
References
Almossawi, Mohammed, 'Bank selection criteria employed by
college students in Bahrain: An empirical analysis', International
Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 19, No. 3, June 2001, pp. 115-25.
Comrey, A.L., A First Course in Factor Analysis, San Diego:
Academic Press, 1973.
Devlin, James F., and Philip Gerrard, 'Choice criteria in
retail banking: An analysis of recent trends, Journal of Strategic
Marketing, Vol. 12, No. 1, March 2004, pp. 13-27.
Huu Phuong Ta, and Kar Yir Har, 'A Study of Bank Selection
Decision in Singapore using the Analytical Hierarchy Process',
International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 18, No. 4, July 2000, pp.
170-80.
Josee Bloemer, Kode Ruyter, and Pascal Peter, 'Investigating
Drivers of Bank Loyalty: The Complex Relation between Image, Service
Quality and Satisfaction', International Journal of Bank Marketing,
Vol. 16, No. 7, December 1998, pp. 276-86.
Kaynak, Erdener, and Talha D. Harcar, 'American
consumers' attitudes towards commercial banks: A comparison of
local and national bank customers by use of geodemographic
segmentation', International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 23,
No. 1, January 2005, pp. 73-89.
Kennington, Carolyn, Jeanne Hill, and Anna Rakowska, 'Customer
Selection Criteria for Banks in Poland', International Journal of
Bank Marketing, Vol. 14, No. 4, December 1996, pp. 12-21.
Laroche, M., J.A. Rosenblatt, and T. Manning, 'Services used
and factors considered important in selecting a bank: An investigation
across diverse demographic segments', The International Journal of
Bank Marketing, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1986, pp. 35-55.
Malhotra, N.K., Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation, New
Delhi: Pearson Education, 2005.
Meidan, A., 'Branch managers attitude on bank objectives and
operations', Proceedings of the European Academy of Advanced
Research in Marketing Conference, Paris, France: Insead, 26-29 May 1976,
pp. 215-28.
Miller, Robert L., Ciaran Acton, Deiredre A. Fullerton, and John
Maltby, SPSS for Social Scientists, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.
Nargundkar, Rajendra, Marketing Research: Text and Cases, New
Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill, 2002.
Shevlin, Ron. and Catherine Graeber, 'What Influences
Consumers' Choice of Banks?', Forrester Researc, Inc., October
2001.
Ulengin, Burc, 'Using hierarchical information integration to
examin customer preferences in banking', International Journal of
Banking, Vol. 16, No. 5, September 1998, pp. 202-10.
http://economics.about.com/cs/finance/a/india_banking.htm
http://www.india-today.com/btoday/netexcl/net20040912/3.html
A. Sajeevan Rao, Assistant Professor, Asia-Pacific Institute of
Management, New Delhi--110025, India.
R. K. Sharma, Assistant Professor, Lalita Devi Institute of
Management and Science, New Delhi--110047, India.
Table 1: KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin 0.592
Measure of Sampling
Adequacy.
Bartlett's Test of Approx. 506.846
Sphericlty Chi-Square
df 300
Sig. 0.000
Table 2: Extraction Method: Principal Component
Analysis
Communalities
Initial Extraction
Loan facility 1.000 0.669
Courtesy and friendliness 1.000 0.771
of the employees
Debit card facility 1.000 0.757
ATM facility 1.000 0.747
Parking facility 1.000 0.476
Speed in services 1.000 0.719
Internet facility 1.000 0.698
Rate of Interest 1.000 0.746
Bank timings 1.000 0.636
Convenient display of 1.000 0.689
counters
Free delivery of overdraft 1.000 0.781
Phone banking 1.000 0.851
Minimum account balance 1.000 0.697
Bank charges 1.000 0.726
Overdraft facility 1.000 0.556
Location of the bank 1.000 0.709
Brand of the bank 1.000 0.674
Centralization of accounts 1.000 0.682
Security arrangements in 1.000 0.607
the bank
Locker facility 1.000 0.683
Demat account 1.000 0.725
Referral from friends and 1.000 0.568
family
Loyalty programmes 1.000 0.537
Continuous flow of 1.000 0.692
information
Simple application for all 1.000 0.809
accounts
Table 3: Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Total Variance Explained
Extraction Sums of Squared
Initial Eigenvalues Loadings
Com- % Vari- Cumula- % Vari- Cumula-
ponent Total ance tive % Total ance tive %
1 5.289 21.157 21.157 5.289 21.157 21.157
2 2.683 10.733 31.890 2.683 10.733 31.890
3 2.231 8.923 40.812 2.231 8.923 40.812
4 1.757 7.027 47.839 1.757 7.027 47.839
5 1.518 6.070 53.909 1.518 6.070 53.909
6 1.345 5.379 59.289 1.345 5.379 59.289
7 1.242 4.968 64.256 1.242 4.968 64.256
8 1.142 4.568 68.824 1.142 4.568 68.824
9 0.970 3.880 72.705
10 0.866 3.463 76.168
11 0.840 3.362 79.530
12 0.732 2.927 82.457
13 0.656 2.623 85.080
14 0.598 2.393 87.472
15 0.529 2.115 89.587
16 0.511 2.042 91.629
17 0.466 1.864 93.493
18 0.349 1.397 94.891
19 0.303 1.211 96.102
20 0.235 0.939 97.042
21 0.233 0.933 97.975
22 0.163 0.651 98.626
23 0.142 0.570 99.196
24 0.114 0.455 99.652
25 8.71E-02 0.348 100.000
Total Variance Explained
Rotation Sums of Squared
Loadings
Com- % Vari- Cumula-
ponent Total ance tive %
1 3.130 12.522 12.522
2 2.386 9.545 22.066
3 2.382 9.529 31.595
4 2.324 9.296 40.891
5 1.904 7.615 48.506
6 1.858 7.434 55.939
7 1.728 6.911 62.850
8 1.494 5.974 68.824
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Table 4: Rotated Component Matrix
Components
1 2
Loan facility 0.145 -5.019E-02
Courtesy and friendliness 0.787 8.551E-02
of the employees
Debit card facility 4.554E-02 -7.468E-02
ATM facility -0.131 -1.492E-02
Parking facility 8.623E-02 0.314
Speed in services 0.712 0.338
Internet facility 0.175 0.654
Rate of Interest 0.694 0.263
Bank timings 0.559 -2.993E-02
Convenient display of 0.716 0.164
counters
Free delivery of 0.207 0.819
overdraft
Phone banking 0.253 0.804
Minimum account balance 0.191 0.175
Bank charges 0.108 9.623E-02
Overdraft facility 8.054E-02 0.183
location of the bank 0.377 0.297
Brand of the bank 8.336E-02 -0.121
Centralization of -0.130 0.127
accounts
Security arrangements -0.161 7.43E-02
in the bank
Locker facility -5.52E-02 -6.148E-02
Demat account -2.389E-02 5.749E-02
Referral from friends 0.163 2.903E-02
and family
Loyalty programmes -6.901E-02 0.184
Continuous flow of 0.387 0.269
information
Simple application for 0.287 6.178E-02
all accounts
Components
3 4
Loan facility 0.284 0.175
Courtesy and friendliness -0.214 0.236
of the employees
Debit card facility 9.530E-02 0.818
ATM facility -0.111 0.796
Parking facility 0.211 0.468
Speed in services 6.158E-02 -0.171
Internet facility 0.306 -1.522E-02
Rate of Interest 0.183 -0.232
Bank timings -0.153 0.212
Convenient display of -5.991E-02 -2.537E-03
counters
Free delivery of -1.315E-02 -7.125E-02
overdraft
Phone banking -0.308 0.132
Minimum account balance -0.426 0.116
Bank charges -0.122 1.387E-02
Overdraft facility 0.155 0.290
location of the bank -0.447 0.327
Brand of the bank -3.059E-02 8.481E-02
Centralization of 0.103 7.900E-02
accounts
Security arrangements -3.410E-02 -0.116
in the bank
Locker facility 0.809 -3.203E-02
Demat account 0.750 0.290
Referral from friends 0.262 0.476
and family
Loyalty programmes 0.408 7.276E-02
Continuous flow of -0.189 0.129
information
Simple application for -0.126 -5.888E-03
all accounts
Components
5 6
Loan facility -0.153 7.090E-02
Courtesy and friendliness 9.624E-02 -0.104
of the employees
Debit card facility 7.273E-03 0.264
ATM facility 0.158 -8.191E-02
Parking facility -3.312E-03 -0.278
Speed in services 8.068E-02 8.162E-02
Internet facility 8.593E-02 0.310
Rate of Interest -6.115E-02 0.284
Bank timings 0.428 7.421E-02
Convenient display of 0.259 -1.768E-02
counters
Free delivery of 0.177 -7.880E-02
overdraft
Phone banking 6.704E-02 9.292E-02
Minimum account balance 5.194E-04 0.415
Bank charges 8.969E-02 0.816
Overdraft facility 0.525 0.310
location of the bank 0.169 0.223
Brand of the bank 4.812E-02 0.235
Centralization of -3.598E-02 -0.265
accounts
Security arrangements 0.126 -3.400E-02
in the bank
Locker facility 5.503E-02 -1.026E-02
Demat account -0.156 -0.199
Referral from friends 0.215 -0.393
and family
Loyalty programmes 0.462 0.300
Continuous flow of 0.537 0.214
information
Simple application for 0.797 -0.209
all accounts
Components
7 8
Loan facility -0.117 0.702
Courtesy and friendliness -0.142 4.904E-02
of the employees
Debit card facility -2.846E-02 8.925E-03
ATM facility 0.209 9.442E-02
Parking facility -3.586E-02 -0.169
Speed in services 0.206 9.365E-02
Internet facility 5.171E-02 0.200
Rate of Interest 1.326E-02 -0.153
Bank timings -0.121 0.227
Convenient display of 7.427E-02 -0.271
counters
Free delivery of 4.019E-02 -0.152
overdraft
Phone banking -5.531E-02 0.109
Minimum account balance 0.508 -7.079E-02
Bank charges 0.121 3.398E-02
Overdraft facility -0.108 -0.156
location of the bank 0.296 7.900E-02
Brand of the bank 0.761 -9.117E-02
Centralization of 0.703 0.257
accounts
Security arrangements 0.158 0.720
in the bank
Locker facility -2.961E-02 0.128
Demat account 0.106 1.203E-02
Referral from friends 0.211 5.476E-03
and family
Loyalty programmes -0.143 5.117E-02
Continuous flow of 7.422E-02 0.280
information
Simple application for 0.159 -4.444E-02
all accounts