The study on implementation of agile manufacturing system in Lithuanian industry/Judrios gamybos igyvendinimo galimybiu tyrimas lietuvos gamybos pramoneje.
Toliusiene, N. ; Mankute, R.
1. Introduction
Global market changes very quickly, and an enterprise which cannot
promptly adapt to it can find itself behind competitors. One of the
goals of Agile Manufacturing (AM) is to keep enterprises in the forward
ranks, which allows them to continue innovations and introduction of new
products. In order to achieve agile manufacturing goals organizations
have to be well organized and flexible.
Introduction of advanced technologies to the enterprise's
system is a huge challenge to its management. Everything has to be
balanced, calculated and planned. AM requires rapid adjustment of
production capability based on customer demands. To accommodate
ever-changing manufacturing requirements, an Agile Manufacturing System
has to be equipped with rapid production plan configuration and resource
allocation capabilities.
Lithuania's integration into the global economy has affected
the country's metal manufacturing industry, and with
intensification of the global competition, agility of manufacturing
acquires great importance.
2. AM aspects
Introduction of a new technology to the enterprise's
operational systems makes changes not only in its organizational
structure but also in its processes, facilities and space.
It is evident that many contemporary components of businesses and
manufacturing systems comprise suitable combinations of human,
computational and electromechanical elements. One way of viewing these
components is that they are resource elements capable of acting and
interacting in a variety of ways to realize business and manufacturing
processes; in so doing collectively, they can operate to accomplish the
business goal [1].
AM implementation can reduce material costs, work force, inventory,
idle facilities or machine time, and improve material handling. It
affects the overall cost, quality, and timing of a product that is very
important to the customer. Agile or flexible production systems are
focused on customer demands therefore, it is difficult to be in front of
competitors. Lithuanian manufacturing companies use to experience the
investments deficit, they cannot buy all necessary machines, for this
reason, to minimize cost the companies have to search for partners.
Co-operation with partners creates favourable conditions for agility,
but proper cooperation requires appropriate tools and techniques. AM is
a concept of technologies and progressive management techniques. AM
makes it possible:
* to managers of the organization to understand better the
strengths and weaknesses of technology alternatives;
* better managed technological solutions.
Information exchange is more easily undertaken inside an enterprise
not that it possesses better internal knowledge (especially tacit
knowledge), concerning technical details of its own products and
production processes, but because enterprises are reluctant to exchange
their core technologies, or at least part of them, with the external
contractors, who might use these technologies in research projects with
the other ones [2].
3. Strategy for AM implementation
The design flexibility provides agility against the competitors and
satisfies more customer demands. In order to be in front of the
competitors the companies have to upgrade their organization units. Fig.
1 intends to identify which organizational characteristics have to be
taken into account in purchasing and implementation of AM technology.
These elements can guide the process of organizational changes, they can
represent the basis for the organizational redesign review. External and
internal circumstances and the technology used determine the
requirements for the organizational redesign. At first in the purchasing
stage, financial possibilities of the organization are to be analyzed,
afterwards, the organizational characteristics and manufacturing
flexibility, and all this can reveal the weak sides.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
Manufacturing management is an important aspect of AM strategy
implementation. Modern manufacturing must take into account some
important aspects to be implemented in the organization, namely:
* labourers' ability to learn;
* specific knowledge of agile technology principles and
"know-how" methods;
* ability to solve unexpected incidents;
* ability to investigate each problem solving possibility.
Fig. 1 shows evaluation of the business venture. AM organizations
have strengths in technology equipment and manufacturing efficiency-they
include innovative and flexible technologies. Moreover, they improve
quality of the product and just-in-time production. However, there are
some threats of AM implementation. New laws and low-skilled labourers
could complicate the innovation implementation. In addition, finance for
new technologies could also be a problem. One of the threats could be
shortage caused by a sudden increase in demand.
The AM implementation requires keeping the machinery and workers
up-to-date, to be competent, to be agile. Intensive planning could be
one of the agility weaknesses. It requires additional expenses hence
expensive to the enterprise e.g. shifting from production of one brand
of a good to another will require adequate research and acquisition of
new machinery. Human resources have a great significance in introducing
an AM system to Lithuanian organizations. On the other hand, agility
improves technological advantages and benefits of information sharing.
The AM gives an opportunity to introduce new products to new markets.
Agility provides flexibility to manufacturing, which has a possibility
to satisfy customers' demands.
Information technology (including the Internet, the Intranet,
teleconferences and videoconferences) can play a critical role in
collecting and presenting necessary information to managers on a
real-time basis [3].
During the evolution of manufacturing enterprises, a number of
technologies, computerized systems and methodologies seeking agility of
manufacturing has been developed (Table 1).
The AM system implementation involves two main stages (Fig. 2). In
the first one the enterprise's financial, organizational and
production possibilities are examined, while in the second stage--its
innovations to be installed and weaknesses are analyzed, for example,
installation of the new software or transmission of information.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
In line with the corporate goals of small manufacturing companies,
the computer system should be able to support decision making of the
product life cycle management. Effectiveness of the computerization
process should be determined by whether the computerized system design
is technically feasible to the company workers' qualification. The
technical system design process involves computer hardware and software
selection and deployment [5].
After a comprehensive analysis of computerized systems usage in
manufacturing enterprises, investigation of various software and their
application areas, taking into account the suggestions and opinions of
users, the list of possible software for AM improvement is composed
(Table 2).
4. Aspects and opportunities of AM implementation in Lithuanian
companies
4.1. Capital investments
Participation in a global market requires the cooperation among
enterprises. Nowadays, short product manufacturing development time and
production lead times are also required. The enterprise has to be agile,
if it wants to determine customers' requirements quickly and
continuously. In fact, AM should be seen as a natural extension and
evolution of the lean manufacturing. Leanness makes it possible [6]:
* a waste free efficient system that is in the bottom line and, in
turn, provides a competitive pricing advantage;
* most of the customers today come to local manufacturing
facilities for their quick response to changes;
* better technical support, shorter time to the market and, most
importantly, short production runs.
Fig. 3 shows capital investments for the new equipment in
Lithuanian enterprises during the period of 1997-2011 (according to the
Statistics of Lithuania [7]). Indicators show that diffusion of
technological innovation in Lithuanian industry is constantly growing.
To ensure the country's industrial competitive ability,
organizations have to create favourable conditions for the industry as a
whole, and especially for development of priority industries.
The statistical data of Lithuanian Statistics Department in 2010
introducing the expenditure of technological enterprises on innovation
activities present 1810.6 million LT [8].
It should be noted that Lithuania's economy is based on small
and medium enterprises, which do not have such favourable possibilities
as large international companies do to make use of knowledge. Changes in
the business environment affect small enterprises in particular. The
government should create better opportunities for the interaction among
academic institutions, businesses and innovation centers.
During the period of 2008-2010, less than a half of Lithuanian
companies were upgraded (Fig. 4). Fig. 5 shows an increasing demand for
the metal products export during 2007-2011. These data indicate that
metal products have a great potential to attract investments to
Lithuania [8].
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
4.2. Analysis of the possibilities of AM strategy implementation in
Lithuanian industry
The virtual enterprise environment facilitates reconfiguration of
the organization's quick response to the changing market
requirements. An individual organization is often not able to respond
effectively within a short period of time due to the lack of internal
capabilities (finance, weak management, low-skilled workers, etc.)
Internal technological development and activities of an enterprise
ensure greater control over the enterprise distribution and serve to
maintain its viable technical capability. Based on the above argument,
it is expected that there will be a positive relationship between
internal technology development and that of a new product [9].
Lithuanian companies have an order handled manufacturing system,
and they should change the strategy, which earlier comprised
customers-manufacturers in the manufacturing process. It has been done
to avoid misunderstandings (Fig. 6).
In manufacturing enterprises the most common production process
consists of technological and economic aspects. The technical processes
are product design, production organization, execution of economic,
market research, and financial analysis of the production process. All
of these components are to be interdependent.
To become an agile Lithuanian manufacturing organization, an
innovative technology that allows marketers, designers and production
personnel to share a common database of parts and products, to share the
data on production capacities and problems has to be supported.
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
Traditional methods may be insufficient to deal with the level of
complexity associated with manufacturing processes and products. To
remain competitive in the rapidly changing environment, flexibility,
responsiveness, agility, and better quality are urgent. This obviously
points out the importance of automated knowledge exchange between
manufacturing units. In other words, to create a good knowledge exchange
system, enterprises have to share their knowledge and available
information in real time.
One of the aims of a manufacturing organization should be the
relation between the internal organization departments and the
information exchange with customer-manufacturer who have to participate
in all production stages. Agile manufacturing is closely related to CAD,
CAM, CAPP and others computerized systems in the CIM environment [10].
Usefulness of CAD/CAM systems integration is ability to visualize a
product design, to support a design analysis and to link to the
generation of part programmers for manufacturing. However, CAD/CAM
systems have to be standardized to acquire an ability to communicate
with each other. Different CAD or geometric modelling packages store the
information related to the design in their own databases, and the
structures of these databases differ from each other [11].
[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 8 OMITTED]
Fig. 7 shows the software usage level in Lithuanian enterprises
[11-13]. Despite of 100% usage of modern software (SW) technologies, the
other results are not very optimistic: even 42% of enterprises are not
optimizing the product design according to price and manufacturing cost.
Only in 25% of enterprises usage of Computer Aided Processes Planning
(CAPP) systems is intensive, but in 33% rare and even 42% are not using
CAPP system at all. Maybe, Lithuanian enterprises do not believe in
their activity effectiveness when applying CAPP systems [12].
FEA in AM manufacturing shows whether a product will break, work,
or wear out, the way it was designed. In the product development
process, it is used to predict what is going to happen when the product
is exploited. CNC programs produce a computer file, that is interpreted
to extract the commands for operating a particular machine. Product data
management (PDM) tools are for tracking and controlling the data related
to a particular product.
A detailed analysis of computer aided systems presented in Table 2
has revealed that there is different software (Scada, Mathlab, Simulink,
Sinumerik, Fanuc, Solidworks, ect.) that can be successfully used by
Lithuanian manufacturers, particularly, for agility improvement.
Fig. 8 presents an approach of software systems integrated
application in an AM enterprise. An integrated approach of this
article's preposition is part of an AM production integration to
help Lithuania businesses compete in the international market.
One of the strategic steps to become agile is to implement lean
manufacturing features [14]. This type of manufacturing system is based
on the integration of production flow, process control, organization,
metrics, and logistics. In Lithuania there are 68% of mechanical
machining enterprises, which use obsolete equipment (Fig. 4). It is
important to remember that leanness makes it possible to have a waste
free efficient system that adds to the bottom line and in turn gives a
competitive pricing advantage what Lithuanian industry needs today.
5. Conclusions
The production capability to satisfy customers' demand
requires industrialists to install adaptive technologies in
manufacturing enterprises. The customer-manufacturer should be included
in all product manufacturing processes, like material planning,
technology process planning, manufacturing and product delivering. To be
ahead of competitors Lithuanian manufacturing enterprises should invest
in the flexible equipment implementation.
1. Firstly, one of the important aspects of AM implementation is
identification of weak sides of the enterprise.
2. Essential directions of the AM strategy are: ability to learn;
"know-how" methods; fast problem solving.
3. Major problems in Lithuania for implementation of the AM system
are: investments; poor cooperation between academic institutions and
business; stereotypical attitude of the enterprise management.
4. The most common missing links in Lithuanian enterprises are:
information exchange; computerization of enterprise activities and
technology flexibility
5. Computerization is one of the most important parts of the AM
system that connects work of all organizations. The integrated approach
for software application can increase enterprise productivity, product
quality, and make the enterprise attractive to new customers.
cross ref http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.mech.19.6.6001
Received December 12, 2012
Accepted November 29, 2013
References
[1.] Richard H. Weston; Ian A. Coutts; Paul E. Clements 2006.
Integration Infrastructures for Agile Manufacturing Systems, Springer
Berlin Heidelberg, 789823.
[2.] Kai Xu; Kuo-Feng Huang; Shanxing Gao 2012. Technology
sourcing, appropriability regimes, and new product development, Journal
of Engineering and Technology Management 29(2): 265-280.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.03.003.
[3.] Andersen, T.J. 2001. Information technology, strategic
decision making approaches and organisational performance in different
industrial settings, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 10(2):
101-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(01)00043-9.
[4.] Anuziene, L.; Bargelis, A. 2007. Decision support system
framework for agile manufacturing of mechanical products,
Mechanika3(65): 51-56.
[5.] Walter W.C. Chung; Stanley K.O. Chik 2001. Computerization
strategy for small manufacturing enterprises in Hong Kong, Int. J.
Computer Integrated Manufacturing 14(2): 141.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09511920150216260.
[6.] United states Environmental protection Agency. 2003. Lean
Manufacturing and the Environment: Research on Advanced Manufacturing
Systems and the Environment and Recommendations for Leveraging Better
Environmental Performance. Online
http://www.epa.gov/lean/environment/pdf/leanreport.pdf, 14-18p. [visited
07 December 2012].
[7.] Statistics Lithuania.--http://www.stat.gov.lt/lt/ [visited 25
September 2012].
[8.] Statistics Lithuania: Database of Indicators.
http://db1.stat.gov.lt/statbank/default.asp?w=1440 [visited 27 September
2012].
[9.] Ayyappan, S.; Jayadev, P.K. 2010. Enabling technologies and
implementation framework for agile manufacturing, The IUP Journal of
Operations Management, 9(1-2): 55-70.
[10.] Prakash, A.; Chan, F.T.S.; Deshmukh, S.G 2012. Application of
knowledge-based artificial immune system (KBAIS) for computer aided
process planning in CIM context, International Journal of Production
Research, 50(18): 4937-4954.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.616234.
[11.] Abouel, E. 2007. Computer-Based Design and Manufacturing,
Springers Science + Business Media, LLC USA, 370 p.
[12.] Forum of project IRMA.--http://www.irmaproject.eu [visited 29
November 2012].
[13.] Bargelis, A.; Mankute, R 2010. Impact of manufacturing
engineering efficiency to the industry advancement, Mechanika 4(84):
38-44.
[14.] Mankute, R.; Bargelis, A. 2010. Inter-Countries Research For
Manufacturing Advancement in Lithuania, Mechanika-2010: Proceedings of
15th International Conference, Kaunas University of Technology,
Lithuania, 287-292.
[15.] Salah A.M. Elmoselhy 2012. Implementation of the hybrid
Lean--Agile manufacturing system strategic facet in automotive sector,
International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Technology 5(1):
241-258.
N. Toliusiene, Kaunas University of Technology, Kestucio 27, 44312
Kaunas, Lithuania, E-mail: neringa.toliusiene@stud.ktu.lt
R. Mankute, Kaunas University of Technology, Kestucio 27, 44312
Kaunas, Lithuania, E-mail: rasa.mankute@ktu.lt
Table 1
Technologies, computerized systems and methodologies
for manufacturing agility
Technologies [4] Computerised systems Strategies and
methodologies
* Computer numerical * Computer aided * Just in time (JIT);
control equipment; design (CAD)
* Computer aided * Ability to develop
manufacturing (CAM); quickly;
* Flexible * Computer aided * Lean manufacturing
manufacturing process planning (LM);
systems (FMS); (CAPP);
* Material resource * Total productive
planning (MRP); maintenance
* Robots. * Manufacturing (TPM);
resource planning
(MRP II);
* Enterprise * Enterprise supplier
resource planning networks
(ERP);
* Computer aided (ESN).
engineering (CAE);
* Finite element
analysis (FEA);
* Production data
management (PDM);
* Computer aided
analysis (CAA);
* Production
planning system
(PPS);
* Computer numerical
control systems
(CNC);
* Bill of material
(BOM);
* Automated storage
and retrieval system
(AS/RS).
Table 2
Computerized systems for AM improvement
Application area Software
Computerization of product CAD:
design NX Cad; Tebis; Eagle; Just CAD; 3D
Max; AC3D; Aladin 4D.
CAM:
Solid CAM; DelCAM; TopSolid.
CAD/CAM:
Cimosa; Dura; Emerson Industrial
Automation; Siemens automation;
Scada.
Software for product CAA:
statistical analysis Salome; CatiaV5; Fluent; Abaqus;
Mathlab; Simulink; Get CAA; Mode
X3D.
Software for Inventory MRP:
control Provisions; Smarter Manager; Delmia;
Kenandy; Meta systems; ProModel;
Con-sona; Mie Track Pro; Sage;
Microsoft Dynamics.
Software for product material BOM:
bills Master Control; Microsoft; MPD
Manager; Parts and Vendors; Scada;
BOM Builder; Enovia.
Production planning PPS:
computerization Exact; ECI; Intuitive; Preactor;
Orchestrate.
Product analysis of whether a FEA:
product will break, wear out, Algor; Ansa; AutoForm; Lisa; ADINA;
or work Impact; FEBio; J L Analyzer; CADRE;
FEMM; UNA; FrameWork; Structural
Mechanics.
Software for computer CNC:
numerical control Siemens(sinumerik); Fanuc;
SimulatorPro; Mitsubishi sim; Fagor
sim.; HAAS sim.; KND sim.; DASEN
sim.; WA sim.; Burny AMC; Vectric;
SA-NYING RENHE; Sky; MED model.
Software for data of the PDM:
product MAXQDA; SolidWorks; Siemens; MSDS;
Soft Expert; PDM; Works; Autodesk;
Tool Data Management; PTC;
Cameleon; Draft Sight.
Storage automation software AS/RS:
Genesis; HP X1000; SIM X; Henning
Visual Esti Track.
Fig. 4 Technology upgraded in Lithuania during 2008-2010
Companies using new equipment 32%
Companies using traditional
equipment 68%
Note: Table made from pie chart.
Fig. 7 Computerization level of Lithuanian manufacturing
enterprises [13]
Intensive Normal Rare No used
SW 25 41 32 0
CAD 25 32 0 41
CAPP 25 0 32 41
CAM 0 58 32 7
ERP/MRP 25 41 18 18
Note: Table made from bar graph.