Structural integrity verification of polycarbonate type personal identity documents/Polikarbonatiniu asmens tapatybes dokumentu strukturinio vientisumo patikra.

Greicius, S. ; Daniulaitis, V. ; Vasiliauskas, R. 等

1. Introduction

As Lithuania has joined the Schengen area and due to the fact that it has external borders of the area, officers of the State Border Guard Service must take great responsibility in allowing or not allowing individuals to enter not only to their own country, but the whole Schengen area as well. Rapid globalization and integration processes lead to a growing number of persons crossing the borders. In particular, the flows of individuals crossing the borders increase in the events of emergencies and moving across the borders is a common problem of all the institutions involved in border control activities. Therefore, reliable authenticity assessment of personal identity documents is a prerequisite for normal existence of a human in the infrastructure of modern society.

According Schengen Borders Code [1] "all persons shall undergo a minimum check in order to establish their identities on the basis of production or presentation of their travel documents. Such a minimum check shall consist of a rapid and straightforward verification, where appropriate by using technical devices and by checking, in the relevant databases, information exclusively on stolen, misappropriated, lost and invalidated documents, of the validity of the document authorizing the legimate holder to cross the border and of the presence of signs of falsification or counterfeiting".

The officers, who inspect travel documents of persons crossing the borders, should be familiar with the procedures of manufacture, issuance and application of the documents as well as anti-counterfeiting techniques. In practice, a number of methods are used for protection of personal identity documents against counterfeiting and a number of methods of assessing their authenticity are applied. For protection of the documents can be applied different means--rainbow press (three color protection grids, microtexts and other), special paint (optically variable, shining under UV or infrared illumination, having magnetic, electrical conductive, temperature sensitive or chemical properties or other), special printing methods (intaglio printing, letterpress, metallographic, laser printing, etc.), the paper of specific quality and with distinctive features (watermarks, filaments, shining or nonshining under the appropriate illumination, etc), new materials (polymers, teslin, multilayer polycarbonate structures and other).

In order to ensure smooth movement of persons, document checking procedures are to be reduced significantly in time. Usually for inspection of the document (validity assessment, visa) only a few minutes are allocated. In case of suspicion on the authenticity of the document, it is inspected not only visually, but using technical devices as well. With the evolution of manufacturing technologies of travel documents, and materials used for the manufacture, as a very important factor becomes the development and application of new devices and new methods which allow to verify the document's authenticity.

In order to ensure smooth movement of persons crossing the borders personal travel documents of European Union countries and majority of the countries of the world are being developed taking into account the requirements of EU and recommendations of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Also they should comply the requirements of standard ISO/IEC 7810:1995 for ID--3 cards and the requirements defined in the document Doc9303 of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) as well as in COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 2252/2004 of 13 December 2004 on standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by Member States [2]. The main requirements to data sheet of the document (the main object of counterfeit) are set on its thickness (it should not exceed 0.9 mm) and on the material from which it is manufactured (nowadays the most frequently a multilayer structure made of polycarbonate foil and other synthetic materials is used). Typical structure of a document sheet which is composed of several layers of polycarbonate foil Makrofol ID 6-2 laserable, Makrofol ID 4-4 white [3], manufactured by the German company Bayer Material Science AG and a layer of synthetic material is presented in Fig. 1.

Attention should be paid to the fact that the structure as presented is just typical (recommended) structure. In the countries that currently apply multilayer structures for their travel documents (USA, majority of European countries, the countries of South-East Asia, Central and South America, Africa) the data sheets are manufactured from different number of polycarbonate foil layers each of which has different thickness integrating these layers with a layer of teslin (synthetic material based on silicon oxide)--as presented in Fig. 2.

Statistical analysis of the results on authenticity assessment of personal identity documents reveals that data sheets most frequently are damaged (with the aim to counterfeit) by mechanical means in the zone of photo. After damaging of the data sheet in case of counterfeit and putting efforts to restore its initial state, always residual technological defects remain (joining of polycarbonate foil layers and teslin layer by fusion or applying gluing materials and other). In Fig. 3 an example of the data sheet which was mechanically damaged with the sequent efforts to restore its primary state is presented.

For authenticity assessment of the travel documents various methods of nondestructive control can be applied. They are based on different principles and differ by sophistication level of the hardware and software applied [4-6]. As the methods applied, the methods of visual inspection, laser, ultrasonic, acoustic emission, vibration methods, mechanical loading, thermo graphic, thermal emission and other methods can be applied [7, 8].

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

Taking into account specific features of the data sheet manufacturing technology (fusion of the layers and/or gluing), the present research is based on the assumed hypothesis--after mechanical damaging of the document's structure with the following attempts to restore its primary state the existence of residual mechanically damaged zones (air bubbles--gaps, lack or excess of gluing material, melting of the layers) should have an influence on physical and mechanical properties of the structure [9-12]. The change of such properties could serve as the background for authenticity assessment of the document under inspection. In order to prove the hypothesis experimental research and simulation of the structure behavior applying thermo graphic and thermal emission methods was performed.

2. Experimantal research

With the aim to make analysis of the influence of technological defects in the data sheet (delaminating of polycarbonate foil and teslin layer, locally damaged zones, inserts of non proper material) on thermal properties (e.g. thermal conductivity) experimental research of heat flux transfer in the direction of the sheet thickness was performed. An assumption that heat conductivity is different in structurally healthy and damaged zones would suggest not uniform temperature field on a surface of the sheet if its opposite surface is affected by a uniform across all the surface area heat flux.

Experimental research was performed using the test rig, the structure of which is presented in Fig. 4. As it is seen, thermo graphic camera A20 (FLIR Systems, Inc., USA) was used to capture the image of temperature fields on the sheet's side and numerical values of temperatures at analyzed points were recorded by infrared thermometer Testo 845 (TESTO, Inc., USA). Experimentation was carried out according the following procedure: One side of the analyzed document was affected for 120 seconds by a locally applied heat flux (diameter of the heat flux zone approximately equals to 10 mm) which was generated by a heat source of infrared radiation. Simultaneously surface temperature dynamics (change in time) on the opposite side of the document was recorded by infrared thermometer Testo. Then the heat source was removed allowing the structure to cool recording the surface temperature for 250 s from start point of the test. Together temperature isosurfaces of the relatively big area of the document's sheet covering the heat flux affected local zone were captured by thermo graphic camera A20 at different instances of time. Such testing procedures were performed with structurally healthy and mechanically damaged document sheets. Next, onto one side of the document sheet uniformly distributed over all the surface area heat flux was applied. Practically this was executed by bringing into touch contact with the sheet's surface a uniformly heated massive body. In the later testing case temperature isosurfaces were captured by thermo graphic camera A20 as well. Structurally healthy and mechanically damaged document sheets were tested. It is worth paying attention that in case of mechanically damaged sheets temperature isosurfaces indicate not uniform temperature field on the surface.

[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]

Results of the experimental research are given in Figs. 5 and 6. In Fig. 6 examples of temperature change curves, characteristic for structurally healthy and mechanically damaged documents in case when ambient temperature was equal to 20.5 [degrees]C, the document was affected by locally applied heat flux for 120 s and then allowed to cool to ambient temperature, are presented. Fig. 5 presents the captured image of thermal field on the surface of mechanically damaged document when on its opposite side was locally applied source of infrared radiation. In this case non even distribution of temperature field can be distinguished.

The results of temperature measurement reveal that under identical conditions of external heating, temperature values and their change dynamics at different points of the surface differ what suggest different parameters of thermal conductivity at these zones.

3. Theoretical analysis

Taking into account the results of performed experimantal research and with the aim to get a model describing teperature dynamics, a theoretical calculation scheme of thermal energy transfer was built as shown in Fig 7.

[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]

The numbers in it represent the equations for the solution of heat exchange problem as follows.

On all side surfaces and in the top surface the boundary condition--heat flux

-n(-k[nabla]T) = [q.sub.0] + h([T.sub.inf] - T) (1)

The condition of heat flux balance in all subdomains

[rho][C.sub.p] [[partial derivative]T/[partial derivative]t] + [nabla](-k[nabla]T) = 0 (2)

On the bottom surface which is heat affected the boundary condition-temperature

T = [T.sub.0] (3)

[FIGURE 8 OMITTED]

On common surfaces of subdomains the boundary condition--continuity

[-n.sub.u]([-k.sub.u][nabla][T.sub.u])[-n.sub.d]([-k.sub.d] [nabla][T.sub.d]) = 0 (4)

where k is thermal conductivity, [k.sub.u] and [k.sub.d] are out-of-plane thermal conductivity, upside and downside at the subdomains boundaries W/(mK); [rho] is density, kg/[m.sup.3]; n is normal vector to a surface; [n.sub.u], [n.sub.d] are normal vectors to the boundaries of subdomains , upside and downside; [q.sub.0] is a inward heat flux, W/[m.sup.2]; [C.sub.p] is heat capacity at constant pressure, J/(kgK); h is heat transfer coefficient, W/([m.sup.2]K); [T.sub.inf] is external temperature, K; [T.sub.0] is surface temperature, K; [T.sub.u], [T.sub.d] are out-of-plane temperature, upside and downside on the boundaries surfaces; T is temperature K; [nabla] is temperature gradient, t is time, s.

The following physical properties of materials and the parameters were used:

--Polycarbonate: k = 0.2 W/(mK); [C.sub.p] = 1200 J/(kgK); [rho] = 1200 kg/[m.sup.3];

--[Air.bar] k = 0.25 W/(mK); [C.sub.p] = 1015 J/(kgK); [rho] = 1.2 kg/[m.sup.3];

--[Teslin.bar] nondamaged: k = 33 W/(mK); [C.sub.p] = 550 J/(kgK); [rho] = 1805 kg/[m.sup.3];

--[Teslin.bar] damaged: k = 0.017 W/(mK); [C.sub.p] = 600 J/(kgK); [rho] = 1700 kg/[m.sup.3];

--[q.sub.0] = 0 W/[m.sup.2], h = 20 W/([m.sup.2]K), [T.sub.inf] - 293.6 K.

For the solution of the problem of heat exchange FEM model implementing the presented calculation scheme was constructed using COMSOL Multiphysics system.

Physical properties of polycarbonate and air were taken from material data basis of the COMSOL Multiphysics system. Thermal properties of the damaged and nondamaged teslin layer were determined using the data obtained at experimental research presented above. Transient process analogous to the one obtained by experimentation was modeled--at the distance of 0.0005 m from the bottom plane centre of multilayer data sheet at the circular shaped area with the radius of 0.005 m 1000 W/m2 inward heat flux was applied for the 120 s duration. Then it was removed and the data sheet was allowed to cool. The obtained results are presented in Fig. 8.

In order to analyze sensitivity of the model in detecting the defects, several defects, different in their geometry, dimensions and location place were introduced into the data sheet.

Simulation procedure using such data sheet is analogous like in previous experiment. Heating of the bottom surface of the data sheet was simulated by applying to it a uniform field of temperature of 27 [degrees]C and constant in time at the distance of 0.0005 m from the surface. Temperature of the top surface of the sheet stabilizes after transient process of 130 s duration. The process is presented in Fig. 9.

[FIGURE 9 OMITTED]

The simulation results in Fig. 9 indicate 0.5[degrees]C surface temperature difference of mechanically damaged and nondamaged data sheet structure. Such difference is sufficient to be registered by modern thermo vision cameras. The transient processes of surface temperature were recorded at the zones A, B and [OMEGA] (Fig. 7). Temperature field of the top polycarbonate layer of the data sheet is presented in Fig. 10. At the zones with mechanically damaged teslin layer temperatures are lower than in the zones of nondamaged structure of the data sheet. The reason is the change of thermal properties of teslin. Even the damaged zones of small dimensions can be distinguished, i.e. a circle of the diameter 0.001 m is clearly visible.

[FIGURE 10 OMITTED]

Temperature distribution on the top of the data sheet's polycarbonate layer across the section as indicated by the line in Fig. 10 is presented in Fig. 11.

From these simulation results (Fig. 11) temperature decrease on the top of the data sheet due to mechanical damage of teslin layer can be clearly seen.

[FIGURE 11 OMITTED]

Temperature field can be presented in the form of temperature isosurface as given in Fig. 12.

[FIGURE 12 OMITTED]

4. Coclusions

1. The nature of mechanical damage of multilayer structure of travel documents (polycarbonate-teslin) suggests a hypothesis of the change of its physical properties in the damaged zones what serves as a background for the development of effective methods of counterfeiting detection.

2. Experimental research of the process of heat exchange through the thickness of the documents data sheet proved the damaged zones to have different values of thermal parameters compared to the ones of structurally healthy zones of the data sheet.

3. A mathematical model of the heat exchange process and its realization by FEM model in COMSOL Multiphysics system were developed and thermal conductivity parameter of damaged and nondamaged teslin layer was identified from the results of experimental research. The simulation results of the process under identical heating and boundary conditions as during experimentation were found out to be in agreement with the experimental research results. This proves the model's validity.

4. Simulation of heat exchange process when the bottom surface of the data sheet was heated resulted in temperature differences on the top surface of the sheet at damaged and nondamaged zones sufficient for detecting with modern thermo vision cameras (0.5[degrees]C). Taking into account short duration of the process and reasonable heating temperatures ([T.sub.0] [approximately equal to] 27[degrees]C) it can be concluded that analysis of temperature fields during heat transfer through the sheet' s thickness can be used as a method for structural integrity verification of the data sheet of a travel document.

Received April 27, 2011

Accepted April 05, 2012

References

[1.] Reguliation (Eu) No. 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules goverming the movemenr of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code).

[2.] http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do7uri= OJ:L:2004:385:0001:0006:EN:PDF.

[3.] http://www.polymery.ru/letter.php?n_id=4801.

[4.] Vishu, Sh. 1998. Handbook of Plastics Testing Technology, New York [etc.], XV, 527p.

[5.] Bicerano J. 2002. Prediction of Polymer Properties. New York, XVIII, 756 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780203910115.

[6.] Kibirkstis, E.; Venyt?, I.; Mayik, V.; Vakulich, D. 2011. Investigation of geometrical and physical-mechanical parameters of Braille by assessing the different types of cardboard materials, Mechanika 17(6): 656-660. http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.mech.17.6.1010.

[7.] Ziliukas, A.; Malatokiene, A. 2011. Fracture of laminated rectangular bar after buckling, Mechanika 17(4): 352-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.mech.17.4.560.

[8.] Trofimov, N.N. et all. Composite Materials Physics, Moscow: Mir, Vol.1, 456 p., Vol.2, 344 p. (in Russian).

[9.] Frenkel, S.J.; Bartenev, B.M. 1990. Polymer Physics, Leningrad, Chimia, 432 p. (in Russian).

[10.] Gosorg, Z. 2005. Infrared Thermography. Fundamentals, Technique, Applications, Moscow: Mir, 416 p. (in Russian).

[11.] Dulnev, G.N.; Zarichjak, J.P. 1974. Thermal Conductivity of Mixtures and Polymer Materials, Leningrad: Energija, 263 p. (in Russian).

[12.] Misnar A. 1968. Thermal Conductivity of Solid Bodies, Liquids, Gases and Their Composites, Moscow: Mir, 464 p. (in Russian).

S. Greicius, Mykolas Romeris University, Kaunas Faculty of Public Security, V. Putvinskio 70, 44211 Kaunas, Lithuania, E-mail: s.greicius@mruni.eu

V. Daniulaitis, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu g. 50, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania, E-mail: vytautas.daniulaitis@ktu.lt

R. Vasiliauskas, Mykolas Romeris University, Kaunas Faculty of Public Security, V. Putvinskio 70, 44211 Kaunas, Lithuania, E-mail: r.vasiliauskas@mruni.eu

K. Pilkauskas, Kaunas University of Technology, Mickeviciaus 37, 44244 Kaunas, Lithuania, E-mail: kestutis.pilkauskas@ktu.lt

V. Jurenas, Kaunas University of Technology, Mechatronics Center for Research, Kestucio str. 27, 44312 Kaunas, Lithuania, E-mail: v.jurenas@ktu.lt

http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5755/j01.mech.18.2.1570