Effect of lubricant contamination on friction and wear in an EHL sliding contact/Tepalo uzterstumo itaka trinciai ir issidevejimui ehl slydimo kontakte.
Sari, M.R. ; Ville, F. ; Haiahem, A. 等
Nomenclature
a--contact half width, m; C--contaminant concentration, g/l;
E--Young's modulus, GPa; E'--dimensionless elasticity modulus,
Pa; f--frequency, Hz; [P.sub.h]--maximal hertzian pressure, MPa;
Ra--roughness, [micro]m; [R.sub.x]--radius of relative curvature, m;
S--stroke length, um; W--normal load, N; U1--ball velocity, m/s;
U2--disk velocity, m/s; [v.sub.0]--kinematic viscosity at the reference
temperature and pressure ([T.sub.0], [P.sub.0]), Cst; v--Poisson ratio.
1. Introduction
Lubricants, which play an important role in wear and friction
reduction, inevitably contain solid contamination particles. These
undesirable particles can be generated within machine components by
abrasion and adhesion, or perhaps entrained into the lubricating oil
from the surroundding environment. Such particles become one of the
major causes of failure of a tribological system. They damage surfaces
and lead to fatigue and wear of machine elements.
In recent years, several authors have experimentally and
numerically studied the effect of lubricant contamination on an
elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL) contact. The entry and deformation
of particles in an EHL contact have been studied experimentally [1-5].
In these studies, the optical interferometry technique is used to follow
the particle behavior in the contact. By theoretical means, many authors
have calculated the pressure field in the presence of a dent on the
surfaces [6-11]. They showed that a dent increases the stress in the
solid surfaces. Other authors have focused their attention on the
evolution of the dent in the contact and its effect on the oil film
thickness [12-14].
Recently, models which take into account the effects of solid
particles in an EHL contact have been developed by Nikas [15], and by
Kang et al. [16]. In a previous work authors [17] have presented an
original experimental study, showing the effect of solid particles on
gear wear. They demonstrated that the presence of sand particles in oil
suspension leads to significant wear in the first few operating cycles
in the zones with a high rate of sliding.
Kreivaitis et al. [18] undertook a study by using a four ball
tribometer in order to investigate tribological behavior of rapeseed oil
mixtures with mono and diglycerides. This study gives detailed pictures
on the possible reason of wear and friction reduction by the
investigated mixtures. Shyshkanova [19] perform a study which consists
to evaluate the effect of friction on contact problems. In this
research, three dimensional contact problem is investigated taking into
account friction, adhesion and roughness.
Other techniques have been used for the prediction the effect of
solid contaminants on surface contact. Among these techniques, vibration
analysis and used oil analysis constitute excellent diagnostic tools in
maintenance. Vahajoa [20] undertook a study using various oil analysis
methods in order to determine the wear of metals in working fluids.
Motylewski et al. [21] also undertook an experimental study for
determining the contamination level and wear severity by using
photo-acoustic investigation. Peng et al. [22] demonstrates the
important role of vibration and oil analysis in machine condition
monitoring and fault diagnosis. In his study, fault detection obtained
by vibration signature is compared with the particle analysis.
In the present paper, the high frequency reciprocating rig (HFRR)
machine has been used to investigate the effect of solid contamination
of lubrication on wear and friction performances of machine components
in a pure sliding EHL contact.
2. Experimental detail
2.1. Experimental device
The friction and wear performance of surface contact were evaluated
using the HFRR Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram of the HFRR device. This
device measures the friction and wear under boundary lubrication
conditions. The principle elements are a reciprocating 6.00 mm diameter
harder ball on a softer steel disk. Both the ball and the disk are made
of AISI 52100 steel. Tests were carried out under the fully submerged
oil condition at different normal load and different contaminated
solution. The oil temperature was controlled by a heater block
longitudinally restrained by a piezoelectric force transducer which
measures the friction force generated between the ball and disk. In
sliding contact the formation of oil film was measured by the electrical
contact potential (ECP) technique.
A wear track produced on the steel ball surface was observed using
optical microscopy.
2.2. Material
2.2.1. The lubricant
The lubricant used is PAO 8. It is a synthetic base lubricating oil
having a kinematic viscosity v0 = 46.8 Cst at T0 = 40[degrees]C. This
oil can be used in many industrial and automotive lubricant applications
like gearboxes, compressors and hydraulic installations.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
2.2.2. The contaminant
The used contaminant is desert sand which can be conveyed by the
wind as far as Europe and even America. It is very rich in silica, with
90% of quartz. It was cleaned and filtered to 40 urn and analyzed
chemically. The chemical constitution is given in Fig. 2.
2.2.3. Test parameters
In order to better understand the EHL contact operation, it is
important to evaluate the mechanical state and functional parameters.
The contact between the ball and disk is circular. Hertzian pressure in
this case is given by
[P.sub.h] = 3W/2[pi][a.sup.2] (1)
where a is the contact half-width
a = [(3W [R.sub.x]/2 E').sup.-1] (2)
and W is the normal load, [R.sub.x] is the radius of relative
curvature given by
[R.sub.x] = [(1/[R.sub.x1] + 1/[R.sub.x2]).sup.-1] (3)
and E' is the dimensionless elasticity module calculated by
E' = [[1/2 (1-[v.sup.2.sub.1]/[E.sub.1] +
1-[v.sup.2.sub.2]/[E.sub.2])].sup.-1]
All test parameters are described in Tables 1 and
2.
3. Results and discussion
The presence of solid particles in lubricant is inevitable. These
undesirable particles cause wear by fatigue or adhesion with surfaces in
rolling contact, and by abrasion with surfaces in sliding contact.
Generally, the oil film and friction coefficient behavior was measured
using a steel ball rubbing against a steel disk under boundary
lubrication conditions at different loads and various concentrations of
contaminants in the lubricant.
Fig. 3 illustrates the behavior of oil film between the ball and
disk at 40[degrees]C and normal load of 0.981 N and 1.96 N. The obtained
results show more noticeable fluctuations at 1.96 N load than that at
0.981 N in the first few instants of operating time. In this time, the
separation is not fully ensured and it has a lower percentage at 1.96 N
load than that at 0.981 N. These results can be explained by the
increase of contact pressure with load increase and consequently the oil
film separation decrease. After this time, the film separation
percentage increases and then becomes stable ensuring consequently a
full separation (i.e., a minimum oil film thickness).
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
It is well known that many debris or solid particles will be larger
than the oil film thickness in an EHL contacts. Therefore once a
particle is entrained into the contact, either it is reduced in size.
The effect of the presence of solid particles on oil film separation at
40[degrees]C is showed in Fig. 4. Results show clearly that the passage
of particles through the contact disturbs the correct operation of
mechanisms leading to the significant fluctuations of oil film
separation. These fluctuations increase with higher contaminants
concentration (Fig. 4, b). This can be explained by the entry of more
particles into the contact.
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
The evolution of friction coefficient has been studied with run
time at normal load of 0.981 N and 1.96 N in an EHL sliding contact for
lubricants containing various concentrations of contaminants. The
obtained results for friction show a corresponding response to the film
formation between surfaces in the boundary lubrication conditions. Fig.
5 shows the variation of friction coefficients for lubricant oil without
contaminants, operating at 40[degrees]C. The friction appears higher at
1.96 N load than that at 0.981 N. This difference can be explained by
the increase of contact pressure leading to decrease of oil film and
consequently to friction increase.
In Fig. 6, we observe that friction in the presence of particles
which disturb the separation of surfaces exhibits more elevated values
compared to operating conditions without the presence of contaminants.
Indeed, solid particles have a significant effect on the surface and
structure leading to a poor surface quality. Therefore the presence of
solid particles in sliding contact leads to significant friction
coefficient. In other hand, we observe that the friction coefficient
increases with a higher concentration of contaminants in lubricant. This
can be explained by the entry of more particles into the contact which
accelerates friction.
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
The effect of temperature variation on friction and oil film
separation in a contaminated medium has been studied. The oil
temperature was controlled by a heater block. The obtained results (Fig.
7) show that the film separation decreases with temperature increase.
This decrease is generally caused by reduction of oil viscosity affected
by the oil temperature evolution. In other hand the presence of solid
particles in lubricant disturbs proper operation of mechanisms leading
to noticeable fluctuations of film separation.
According to Figs. 7 and 8, we note a strong relation between oil
film separation and friction coefficient. Indeed, the decreases of oil
film separation leads to the increase of friction coefficient (Fig. 8).
This increase of friction becomes more elevated with the presence of
solid particles. In a purely sliding contact, the presence of these
undesirable particles into the contact with an increase of oil
temperature accelerates the risk of surfaces damage leading to a poor
surfaces quality and consequently to noticeable increase of friction
coefficient.
[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 8 OMITTED]
For a better understanding of wear phenomenon in a purely sliding
contact, photo-micrographic images of steel ball were taken using
optical microscopy. Fig. 9 characterizes the ball surface at loads of
0.981 N and 1.96 N without the presence of contaminants. Figs. 10, 11
and 12 give detailed pictures of the surfaces under highly contaminated
conditions. The given results show abrasive wear (furrows, stripes,
dents and plastic flow). They are very severe, especially in sliding
contact. This wear is accelerated by the presence of sand particles. In
Figs. 10 and 11, the presence of dents and furrows is noteworthy for
operating with higher concentration of contaminants. The wear becomes
more severe (Fig. 12), especially with the presence of particles and
operating at higher temperature.
[FIGURE 9 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 10 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 11 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 12 OMITTED]
4. Conclusion
The principal objectives of this work are twofold. First, we try to
evaluate friction coefficient under highly contaminated conditions; and,
second, to better understand the effect of solid particles on surfaces
wear. With this intention, friction and wear were investigated using the
HFRR machine.
From this study, the following conclusions are made:
* The presence of solid particles in the lubricant interferes with
the correct operation of lubrication mechanisms.
* The contaminating particles increase the friction coefficient.
The friction coefficient is more elevated in the presence of particles
compared to operating conditions without the presence of contaminants.
* The friction coefficient is elevated with higher concentration of
contaminants in lubricant.
* The results obtained show a strong relation between friction and
oil film separation.
* The presence of solid particles with temperature variation leads
to oil film reduction and as a consequence the friction increases.
* The presence of solid particles in a purely sliding contact leads
to significant wear. In these conditions, the abrasive score marks are
indicative.
* The abrasive wear becomes very severe in a contaminated medium
with an increase of temperature.
This study confirms that the presence of solid particles in the
lubricant has a dual effect: it increases the friction between the
surfaces with a relative sliding, and leads to severe abrasive wear. In
addition, the presence of particles disturbs the correct operation of
lubrication mechanisms and consequently leads to noticeable fluctuations
of oil film separation.
Finally, the results obtained help to explain the mechanisms
lifespan reduction and constitutes a well contribution in order to
understand the role of contamination on friction and machine elements
failure.
In future work, we will try to give an explanations of the
mechanisms that might relate particles to friction increase by a
complete description of the entrainement and deformation of particles
into the contact (i.e., how they enter the contact, how they separate
films, or starve the contact of oil).
Received December 22, 2009 Accepted April 07, 2010
References
[1.] Dwyer Joyce, R.S., Hamer, J.C., Sayles, R.S., Ioannides, E.
Lubricant screening for debris effects to improve fatigue and wear life.
-Proceedings of 18th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology. -Amsterdam:
Elsevier, 1992, p.57-63.
[2.] Nelias, D., Sainsot, P., Flamand, L. Deformation of a
particular metallic contaminant and role on surface damage in high speed
ball bearing. -Proceedings of 18th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology.
-Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1992, p.145-151.
[3.] Cann, P.M.E., Hamer, J.C., Sayles, R.S., Spikes, H.A.,
Ioannides, E. Direct observation of particle entry and deformation in
rolling EHD contact. -Proceedings of 22nd Leeds-Lyon Symposium on
Tribology. -Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1996, p.127-134.
[4.] Dwyer Joyce, R.S., Heymer, J. The entrainment of solid
particles into rolling elastohydrodynamics contacts. -Proceedings of
22nd Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology. -Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1996,
p.135-140.
[5.] Wan, G.T.Y., Spikes, H.A. The behavior of suspended solid
particles in rolling and sliding elastohydrodynamic contacts. -STLE
Transactions, 1988, vol.31, p.12-21.
[6.] Ko, C. N., Ioannides, E. Debris denting--The associated
residual stresses and their effect on the fatigue life of sliding
bearing, an FEM analysis. -Proceedings of 15th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on
Tribology. -Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1989, p.199-207.
[7.] Lubrecht, A.A., Venner, C.H., Lane, S., Jacobson, B.,
Iannides, E. Surface damage--comparison of theoretical and experimental
endurance lives of rolling bearings. -Proceedings of the Japan
International Tribology Conference, Nagoya, Japan, 1990, p.185-190.
[8.] Lubrecht, A.A., Dwyer Joyce, R.S., Ioannides, E. Analysis of
the influence of indentations on contact life. -Proceedings of 19th
Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology.-Amsterdam, 1993, p. 173-181.
[9.] AI, X., Cheng, H.S. The influence of moving dent on point EHL
contacts. -STLE Tribology Transactions, 1994, vol.37, p.323-335.
[10.] Nixon, H.P., Zantopulos, H. Fatigue life performance
--Compared of tapered roller bearing with debris damaged raceways.
-Lubrication Engineering, 1995, 5(19), p.732-736.
[11.] Ai, X., Lee, S. C. Effect of slide to roll ratio on interior
stresses around a dent in EHL contacts. -STLE Tribology Transactions,
1996, 39(4), p.881-889.
[12.] Kaneta, M., Sakai, T., Nishikawa, H. Optical interferometric
observations of the effects of a bump on point contact EHL. -ASME J. of
Tribology, 1992, 114(4), p.779-784.
[13.] Kaneta, M., Nishikawa, H. Local reduction in thickness of
point contact EHL films caused by a transversely oriented moving groove
and its recovery. -ASME J. of Tribology, 1994, 116, p.635-639.
[14.] Kaneta, M., Kanada, T., Nishikawa, H. Optical interferometric
observations of the effects of a moving dent on point contact.
-Proceedings of 23rd Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology. -Amsterdam:
Elsevier, 1997, p.69-79.
[15.] Nikas G.K. A mechanistic model of spherical particle
entrapment in elliptical contacts. -Mechanical Engineering Publications
for the I. Mech. J., 2006, p.507-522.
[16.] Kang, Y.S., Sadeghi, F., Ai, X. Debris effect on EHL contact.
-ASME J. of Tribology, 2000, 122(4), p.711-720.
[17.] Sari, M.R., Haiahem, A., Flamand, L. Effect of lubricant
contamination on gear wear. -Tribology Letters, 2007, vol.27, p.119-126.
[18.] Kreivaitis, R., Padgurskas, R., Jankauskas, J., Kupcinskas,
V., Makareviciene, A., Gumbyte, V. Tribological behavior of rapeseed oil
mixtures with mono-and diglycerides. -Mechanika. -Kaunas: Technologija,
2009, Nr.5(79), p.74-78.
[19.] Shyshkanova, G. Contact problems with the influence of
friction and roughness. -Mechanika. -Kaunas: Technologija, 2004,
Nr.3(47), p.5-12.
[20.] Vahajoa, P. Oil Analysis in Machine Diagnostics. Phd Thesis,
Acta Universitatis Ouluensis, 2006.
[21.] Motylewski, J., Wislicki, B., Krawczyk, K., Kotlicka, E.
Photoacoustic investigation of contaminated working fluids. -Analytical
Sciences, 2001, p.425-427.
[22.] Peng, Z., Kessissoglou, N. An integrated approach to fault
diagnosis of machinery using wear debris and vibration analysis. -Wear,
2003, vol.255, p.1221-1232.
M. R. Sari *, F. Ville **, A. Haiahem ***, L. Flamand ****
* Laboratory of Industrial Mechanics, University of Annaba, B. O.
12, 23000 Algeria, E-mail: sari_rafik10@yahoo.fr
* Mechanical Department, University of Skikda, B. O. 26, 21000
Algeria
** Laboratory of Contact Mechanics and Structures, CNRS UMR 5514
INSA-Lyon 69621 Villeurbanne cedex, France, E-mail:
Fabrice.Ville@insa-lyon.fr
*** Laboratory of Industrial Mechanics, University of Annaba, B. O.
12, 23000 Algeria, E-mail: a_haiahem@yahoo.fr
**** Laboratory of Contact Mechanics and Structures, CNRS UMR 5514
INSA-Lyon 69621 Villeurbanne cedex, France, E-mail:
Louis.Flamand@insa-lyon.fr
Table 1
Friction pair disk-ball
Parameters Ball Disk
Rx, m 3.00 E-03 [infinity]
E, GPa 210 210
v 0.3 0.3
Materials AISI 52100 AISI 52100
Diameter, mm 6.00 15
Thickness, mm -- 3.00
Roughness Ra, [micro]m 0.1 0.1
Table 2
Mechanical state and functional parameters
Parameters Value
S, [micro]m 2000
f, Hz 100
n = 60 f, rpm 6000
[omega] = 3.1416 n/30, [s.sup.-1] 628.32
U1 = [omega] C, m/s 1.26
U2, m/s 0
[absolute value of U1 + U2], m/s 1.26
[absolute value of U1 - U2], m/s 1.26
[absolute value of U1 - U2/U1 + U2], % 100
W, N 0.981 1.96
a, m 2.67 x 3.37 x
[10.sup.-5] [10.sup.-5]
[P.sub.h], MPa 655.284 825.325
Fig. 2 Chemical constitution of sand
Components Percentage %
Si[O.sub.2] 92,4
[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.3] 1,2
CaO 3,79
MnO 0
[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] 1,32
Fire losses 0,92
Note: Table made from bar graph.