Employee reviews on company independent sites and its impact on organizational attractiveness: role of information realism, person--environment fit and source credibility framework.
Kaur, Tavleen ; Dubey, Ritesh Kumar
Introduction
Recruitment consists of those organizational activities and
practices whose primary goal is to identify and attract potential
employees and persuade them toward becoming an organizational member
(Barber 1998; Breaugh, Starke 2000). Recruitment remains an important
function for at least two reasons. First, there will always be certain
hard to fill vacancies for which the organizations must compete fiercely
to attract potential applicants, even in an otherwise loose labor
market. Second, the most talented job seekers continue to have enough
options to critically investigate and compare potential employers.
Therefore organizations that wish to attract these highly desired
potential applicants have no choice but to participate in the "war
of talent" (Cappelli 2001).
Barber (1998) has delineated three phases of recruitment. The first
phase includes identifying potential applicants and persuading them to
apply in the organization. This is about targeting a particular segment
of the job market. There is minimal personal contact during the first
phase and both the parties have limited information about each other.
The second phase includes the applicant pool--those who choose to apply
in the organization and this phase includes more detailed information.
During this phase the organization tries to persuade the candidates to
stay interested in the organization till they make their final decision.
In the last phase the candidates decide whether to accept or reject the
job offers, which includes motivating the selectees to accept the j ob
offers and become new employees. Recruitment activities are most
influential and useful during the initial phases.
In context of external recruitment, Breaugh (2008) stated that the
manner in which the employer recruits is important for two reasons.
Firstly if an employer does a poor job of recruiting, it may not bring
vacancies to the attention of the type of applicants it wants to
recruit. Secondly even if a job vacancy is brought to the attention of
targeted individuals, poor treatment during the process e.g. poorly run
website may result in job applicants withdrawing from the process. The
use of internet or web for providing recruiting information is changing
the nature of communication. Websites provide the opportunity to
communicate practically unlimited amount of information to unlimited
audience which is geographically dispersed at a relatively low cost.
Organizations use different media for communicating information
particularly in recruitment context like career fairs, company websites,
company brochures, campus placements etc. Internet has become an
important medium for both recruiters and the recruits to gather
information about each other. For organizations internet is a less
costly and more efficient way to provide job and organizational
information to the job seekers. Earlier job seekers used to consult
newspapers and friends for gathering information about potential
employers; however with the increased use of Internet, job seekers now
get information from websites, chat rooms and social media sites. On one
hand there is lot of information that is supplied by the company via
company websites, recruitment advertising, etc. On the other hand there
is a lot of information about organizations "going around" on
internet (Dellarocas 2003; Van Hoye, Lievens 2007). Job seekers can
quickly search for such independent information about the organization
from employee's blogs, chat rooms and company independent websites.
So far research has focused on company dependent websites where the
information is completely controlled by the organization whereas company
independent sources have largely been ignored (Cable, Turban 2001; Van
Hoye, Lievens 2007; Walker el al. 2009).
The source of providing recruitment information and the medium used
to communicate such information influences the attractiveness towards
the organization. One of the ways of providing recruitment related
information is through employee testimonials. Research on the usefulness
of employee testimonials has so far focused on corporate websites, which
are under the control of organizations (Van Hoye, Lievens 2007; Walker
el al. 2009). Apart from corporate websites, social media tools like
online communities, forums are becoming popular. The combination of
providing recruitment information in form of employee testimonials on
company independent sites holds the potential to attract prospective
employees and communicate a positive employment image.
The present study suggests certain propositions that would help in
determining which of the sources among company dependent and company
independent would provide more realistic information regarding job and
organizational attributes, which source would be perceived more credible
and which of the two sources would provide better-fit perceptions about
person-job and person-organization. The study also provides a conceptual
framework determining how realistic information leads to organizational
attractiveness.
1. Literature review: web based recruitment
Walker et al. (2009) claim that the use of media to communicate
organizational information increases the likelihood that job seekers
develop preferred image beliefs. When job seekers start their job search
process, corporate website is typically one of the first tools to gather
information and evaluate prospective employers. The way the
organizations communicate through their websites is a crucial
determinant of getting qualified applicants (Williamson et al. 2003;
Cappelli 2001).
Recruitment websites can develop perceptions of organizational
attractiveness through web site usability. In recruitment context this
would mean that relationship between website and organizational
attractiveness could be explained by usability perceptions of
individuals. Web site usability influences organizational attractiveness
through content usefulness which refers to perceived usefulness of the
information posted on the web site and ease of use (Williamson el al.
2003).
Most of the research on web based recruitment has focused on
website usability, features and aesthetics of the website (Cober el al.
2004; Dineen el al. 2002; Williamson el al. 2003). Aesthetic features
include attractive colors, pleasing texts, and pictures. Apart from
features, aesthetics and website usability, the amount of information
provided in the recruitment websites also influence organizational
attractiveness. The more job and organizational related information is
provided on such websites, the more the job applicants are attracted
towards the organization (Williamson et al. 2003; Allen el al. 2004).
Informational characteristics like amount of information,
uniqueness, and specificity of the information provided also affect
attraction towards the organization (Barber 1998). Allen, Biggane,
Pitts, Ottondo and Scoffer (2013) evaluated these informational
characteristics in the context of corporate websites. The authors opine
that one of the primary advantages of recruitment websites is the
ability to present more amount and different types of information.
Receivers pay more attention to specific, unique information and
unexpected information (Allen et al. 2013).
The first point of contact of prospective employees with the
organizations is usually the corporate website (Allen et al. 2004;
Cable, Yu 2006). However only having a corporate website of good quality
is not sufficient. The advent of information technology and especially
web 2.0 has introduced many engaging tools and new ways of interacting
such as blogs, micro blogs and other social media tools (Briones et al.
2011). There are two major internet channels for organizations to
communicate with the external audiences: Corporate websites and social
networking websites (Bondarouk et al. 2012). Despite their presumed
advantages in practice, empirical support considering social media
effects on pre hires recruitment outcomes are scarce.
Research indicates that in Europe 84% of all activities on the
internet are related to social networking sites (Bondarouk etai. 2012).
Cappelli (2001) found that 90% of American companies are using social
networking websites to communicate information to outsiders. Attracting
new generation of employees is becoming increasingly important for
businesses. The new generation of young professionals is often referred
to as Generation Y. Some of the qualities ascribed to them are feeling
more comfortable in informal settings than formal settings, digitally
skilled, socially active both online and offline and connecting their
digital and physical world seamlessly (Briones et al. 2011).
The emergence of social media tools has increased capabilities for
interactive communication and information sharing online. The
participatory nature and instant feedback of social media adds to degree
of interactivity. Organizations have started incorporating social media
elements into their marketing and promoting strategies and fostering
two-way communications between consumers and brands (Parkef al. 2009).
According to Kaplan and Haenlein (2010) "social media is a
group of online applications that are based on ideology and technology
of web 2.0 and enable the creation and exchange of user generated
content". The term social media doesn't have clearly defined
borders and the term web 2.0 antisocial media have been used
interchangeably. According to (Girard et al. 2013) there are two main
types of social media namely social networking sites and social media
sites. The main objective of social networking is connecting with other
people and therefore people create a personal profile like Facebook,
Linkedln. The key purpose of social media sites is sharing of media
content like YouTube, Forums etc.
Recruitment is one of the main HR activity affected by the rise of
social media. Vicknair, Elkersh, Yancey, Budden (2010) are of the
opinion that using social networking websites for screening and
recruiting purposes has become a trend. According to Clark and Roberts
(2010) employers these days use social networking websites especially
Facebook for conducting background checks on prospective candidates.
Facebook, My space, and numerous blogs are being utilized by growing
number of recruiters, potential employers and current employers. The use
of these sites now extends beyond simply befriending people, to
extensive personal networks that seek information about employers,
employees and job opportunities (Waring, Buchanan 2010). On Company
independent sites, current employees share their experiences about how
it is to work with the organization and it falls under the discussion
tools category of social media tools. Despite the use and importance of
social media tools other than corporate websites, there is lack of
empirical research on them (Van Hoye, Lievens 2007).
2. Company dependent v/s company independent sources
A key distinction between recruitment sources can be made as
Company dependent and company independent (Cable, Turban 2001; Van Hoye,
Lievens 2007). Company dependent sources such as advertising are part of
the company recruitment activities and can be directly controlled to
communicate a positive message to potential applicants. Conversely
company independent sources such as word of mouth can be influenced only
indirectly through other recruitment activities and can contain positive
as well as negative information. Compared to company dependent
information sources company independent sources are more likely to be
perceived as credible, as they do not have the explicit purpose of
selling the organization (Van Hoye, Lievens 2007).
Job applicants receive information from sources like recruitment
advertising, recruiters, publicity and word of mouth. Recruitment
advertising represents the most common and typical example of a company
dependent recruitment source. Examples include recruitment brochures and
company web pages (Van Hoye, Lievens 2007). A typical example of company
independent recruitment source is word of mouth and can be defined as
"interpersonal communication, independent of organization's
recruitment activities about an organization as an employer or about
specific jobs" (Van Hoye, Lievens 2007). Examples include
conversations with friends and advice from independent experts. Usually
word of mouth is typically associated with face-to-face interaction that
can be provided through other medium like telephone or Internet. The
importance of web-based word of mouth is evident from the emergence and
increased use of chat-rooms, electronic boards and independent websites
presenting interpersonal company information (Dellarocas 2003).
3. Source credibility
The information a job applicant receives about a job and an
organization can come from variety of sources including interviewers,
other company employees or friends, acquaintances not directly
associated with the organization. The source from which the job seeker
receives information influences the reactions towards that information
(Fisher et al. 1979). Sources of recruitment differ in terms of
perceived credibility, which implies that recruitment sources differ in
the degree to which the job applicants perceive them to be credible
(Cable, Turban 2001). Source credibility has two dimensions namely
expertise and trustworthiness. "Expertise refers to the extent to
which a speaker is perceived to be capable of making correct assertions,
and trustworthiness refers to the degree to which an audience perceives
the assertions made by a communicator to be the ones that the speaker
considers valid" (Pornpitakpan 2004).
Credibility is critically important in persuasive communication,
attitude change and attaining behavioral compliance (Perloff 1993).
Breaugh and Starke (2000) suggested that credibility might be one
important intervening variable between recruitment activities and
outcomes.
In the recruitment context when organizations are trying to sell
organizational characteristics to the potential applicants, more
credible sources are likely to generate positive responses (Allen et al.
2013). With respect to expertise job incumbents are perceived to have
more experience about the j ob, as they are closest to work than
corporate recruiters. With regard to trustworthiness, receiving
information that is different than expected from the message source is
perceived to be more credible. Full time recruiters are seen as less
trustworthy as they present an overly positive picture of job and
organizational attributes. Communicators who convey information that
detracts from their position are rated as more trustworthy than
communicators who cite information that conforms to their position
(Breaugh 2000; Fisher et al. 1979).
Fisher et al. (1979) stated that recruiter credibility helps in
explaining the differential effects on recruitment outcomes. The authors
found that in comparison of four sources (interviewer, job incumbent,
friend and a professor) the most credible source is job incumbent. The
sources were trusted more when they gave unfavorable information rather
than overly positive information. The basis for this assertion is that
corporate recruiters are viewed as lacking expertise, concerning what
the job entails, and are perceived as having a vested interest of
selling the organization and filling the vacancy. In an employment
setting, the interviewer and recruiter are perceived to have a vested
interest to present an overly positive picture of the organization. A
job seeker is more likely to listen and believe a person who is
perceived to be knowledgeable about the subject at hand. This implies
that job seekers perceive job incumbents to have higher credibility than
corporate recruiters as they have on the job experience.
With respect to media credibility Cable and Yu (2006) focused on
three prominent recruitment media namely electronic bulletin boards,
company web pages and career fairs. The authors had predicted that job
seekers would perceive electronic bulletin boards as more credible than
company web site or career fairs as information available on electronic
bulletin boards is generally not organization's self presentation
to attract job candidates. This information is posted by a third party
and is not sanitized and therefore may be perceived as more credible by
the job seekers. Both websites and career fairs however are created by
organizations explicitly to market themselves to the audience and thus
they only try to convey positive information. However, contrary to the
prediction the results suggest that company web pages and career fairs
were found to be more credible than electronic bulletin boards. The
reason provided is that the electronic bulletin boards are not as
popular as web pages and career fairs and lack of familiarity with a
medium may affect perceived credibility.
Research on effects of information from company independent sources
or external sources is scarce. Most of the studies have focused on
effect of the one recruitment source at a time; however in the real job
market job seekers gather information from more than one source.
4. Person environment fit
Management Scholars have a sustained interest in the fit between
employees and their work environment. P-E fit is broadly defined as the
compatibility between individual and work environment that occurs when
their characteristics are well matched. In the recruitment context P-E
fit perspective states that potential applicants are more attracted to
environments with characteristics that are compatible to the individual
characteristics (Kristof 1996; Lauver, Kristof 2001).
Lauver and Kristof (2001) distinguished between P-O fit and P-J
fit. P-Jfit is defined as the match between the abilities of a person
and the demands of a job or the needs/desires of a person and what is
provided by the job. In contrast, P-O fit is "compatibility between
people and organization that occurs when at least one entity provides
what the other needs, they share similar fundamental characteristics or
both" (Kristof 1996). P-J fit is specific to congruence with the
job; P-O fit refers to congruence with organizational values, goals and
mission.
Kristof (1996) made a distinction between "objective" and
"subjective" fit. According to Kristof (1996) objective fit
refers to actual fit, or fit that is defined as an empirical
relationship between separate assessments of individual and
organizational values. On the other hand subjective fit refers to
perceived fit of how well the individual feels they would fit with the
organization. Thus subjective fit represents job seeker's holistic
interpretations of how well their personal characteristics match
organizational characteristics. Using this conceptualization, a good fit
is said to exist as long as it is perceived to exist, regardless of
whether or not the person has similar characteristics to compliment or
is complimented by the organization (Kristof 1996).
Cable and Judge (1996) examined the determinants of fit perceptions
of new employees and job seekers and also how important are these fit
perceptions in making job choice decisions. The authors found that of
the two fit components namely objective fit and subjective fit the
latter is a better predictor of individual outcomes. They
operationalized fit perceptions through interviews with recruiters. It
was found that job seekers subjective fit perceptions are acquired from
congruence between their perceptions of organizations and their own
values. Job seekers subjective fit perceptions significantly predict job
choice intentions.
According to Rynes and Barber (1990) applicants can be wooed not
only through improved job attributes but also through better planned and
more attentive recruitment procedures. Initial contacts with on site
company representatives were found to be responsible for forming initial
impressions of good fit. Other than on site representatives, friends or
acquaintances working with the organization were also found to influence
initial good fit perceptions. Current employees can provide a better
picture of job and organizational attributes; such information helps the
job applicants in self-selection whether or not they fit with the job
and the organization. The present study tries to investigate if
information presented by current employees on company independent sites
lead to better subjective fit perceptions and affect of such subjective
fit perceptions on organizational attractiveness.
5. Realistic information
Breaugh (2008) stated that during early phase of recruitment job
applicants have a) incomplete information about what job opening
involves, b) are not sure of what they want from the position, c) do not
have a self insight about their knowledge, skills and abilities, d)
cannot accurately predict how they will react to demands of the job.
Realistic information refers to presentation of positive and negative,
favorable and unfavorable information about the job attributes to the
job seekers (Breaugh, Starke 2000). Realistic job previews (RJP) are
believed to facilitate self selection where applicants have the
opportunity to analyze whether there is a fit with the job and the
organization, whether there is a match between their needs, skills and
what the organization is offering.
The basic premise upon which RJP is based is that job applicants
most of the times do not have accurate perceptions about j ob they are
applying. Given that employers try to be seen as good place to work for,
the applicants usually have an inflated view of the organization and j
ob. When applicants who have an inflated view are selected they are
likely to be more dissatisfied and more likely to quit than who have
more accurate perceptions (Breaugh, Starke 2000). As a way to reduce
inflated expectations of job applicants about organization and job,
organizations should try to provide both positive and negative aspects
about the job. Providing RJPs will help the job applicants to have an
insight about the person-job and person-organization fit.
Organizations are reluctant in providing any negative information
about the job or the company. The realistic information hypothesis
proposes that persons recruited via different sources are likely to have
more accurate information about what the job entails (Rynes et al.
1991). Possessing such information enables a candidate to decide whether
to proceed with the job and make an informed decision. Current employees
would provide a better picture of how it is to work with the
organization. Inclusion of both positive and negative aspects of the job
may enhance trustworthiness of the company. By including some realistic
information in the recruitment message, especially information that is
negative yet common to many jobs (required to meet deadlines) will
increase the organizational attractiveness; such recruitment message
maybe more persuasive than a traditional recruitment message, which
gives overly positive information.
Thorsteinson et al. (2004) found that providing realistic
information, on certain aspects like job and company, increases
organizational attractiveness. By providing a RJP, those individuals who
do not perceive a good Person Organization or Person - Job fit are able
to withdraw themselves and those who remain in the applicant pool are
generally the most suitable ones and should result in outcomes like
employee satisfaction, retention (Breaugh, Starke 2000).
The focus of realistic job previews has largely been on post hire
outcomes like job performance, satisfaction and turnover. A question
that has largely been ignored is the role of RJP in the recruitment
process (Thorsteinson etai. 2004). Breaugh and Starke (2000) in their
article strongly urge the desire to focus heavily on job applicants than
the new hires. They are of the opinion that researchers need to focus
upon important pre hire variables on which recruitment sources are
likely to have a more immediate impact.
6. Propositions
Inclusion of RJPs may increase organizational attractiveness as
company is willing to provide both positive and negative information.
Providing some realistic information may enhance the perceived
trustworthiness of the organization. Literature on RJPs suggest that
more realistic information of the job and organizational attributes help
in making accurate perceptions regarding the level of congruence between
abilities of the individuals and job and organizational requirements
(Wanous etai. 1992; Breaugh, Starke 2000). Moreover applicants who
perceive a better fit between their knowledge, skills and abilities and
job and organizational requirements are likely to remain in the
selection process and accept job offers.
Credibility is critically important in persuasive communication and
attitude change (Perloff 1993) and is also an important variable in
recruitment process (Breaugh, Starke 2000). Potential applicants view
some information sources as more credible than others (Cable, Turban
2001) and more credible messages are more effective in generating
positive attitudes towards the organization. In the recruitment context
when organization may be trying to sell the organization to potential
applicants more credible content is important. Using source credibility
framework, compared to company dependent sources, company independent
sources might be perceived as providing more credible information
because they do not have explicit purpose of selling the organization
(Van Hoye, Lievens 2007). Compared to company websites, information
available on social media sites is less controlled by the organization.
We expect that employee testimonials displayed on social media site
would be perceived to be more credible than employee testimonial
available on company website as the latter is a company dependent
source.
Figure 1 provides a conceptual framework of the propositions made.
The present study predicts that job seekers will perceive company
independent sites / online communities as more credible than company
websites as the information is posted by the actual employees of the
company who posses more knowledge and expertise about the job and the
company. Most importantly the information available on independent sites
are not self presentation created by the company with the purpose to
attract employees rather such sites are operated and managed by third
parties and the information is not sanitized therefore it is predicted
that such independent sites will be more credible.
Proposition 1: Recruitment communication or employees reviews
presented on Company independent websites provide more realistic
information i.e. both positive and negative information about job and
organizational attributes than company websites.
Proposition 2: Recruitment communication or employees reviews
presented on Company independent websites provide better Subjective P-O
and P-J fit than company websites.
Proposition 3: Recruitment communication or employees reviews
presented on Company independent websites will be perceived more
credible than company websites.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
Proposition 4: Perceptions of organizational attractiveness will be
higher when recruitment message contain realistic (positive and negative
information) than when recruitment message only contains positive
information.
Proposition 5: Relationship between realistic information and
organizational attractiveness will be mediated by subjective P-O Fit,
P-J Fit.
Propositions 6: Relationship between realistic information and
organizational attractiveness will be mediated by perceived credibility.
The following propositions can be tested with reference to online
reviews sites (www.glassdoor.com), where the current employees testify
how it is to work with the organizations. Online reviews sites are
completely third party sites therefore less expected to provide only
positive information about job and organizational attributes. Online
review sites can be compared with company's own webpages where the
information is expected to be sanitized as it is directly under the
control of the organization. The other social media tools which are used
for information sharing is Facebook Most of the organizations on
Facebook have their career pages and also has anonymous confession pages
for organizations. The information available on such pages have the
potential of influencing the decisions to apply in the organization,
LinkedIn too other than providing increased networks also provide lot of
information about the job and the organization along with employee
testimonials. These new media tools can be compared to know which one
provides best return in terms of more realistic information, more
credible information.
Conclusions
The extant literature on recruitment sources has so far majorly
focused on post hire outcomes like job performance, satisfaction,
turnover and intention to leave. The effect of recruitment activities on
job choice decisions is still scarce and inconclusive. The recruitment
has majorly focused on source credibility, the role and importance of
media credibility has largely been ignored. It is evident from the
literature that job incumbents as recruitment sources are perceived to
be most credible as they are the ones closely associated with work and
have information about job and organizational attributes (Rynes et al.
1991). Corporate recruiters are perceived to be less credible as they
have an explicit intention of presenting an overly positive image of the
organization before the potential applicants. As far as media
credibility is concerned on one hand we have company websites as one of
the prominent sources of generating pool of applicants, however the
information found on company web pages is positive, as the objective is
to promote the organization. On the other hand it is observed that
current employees are sharing their experiences about their current or
ex-employers on various forums like (www.glassdoor.com, www.vault.com)
which are operated and managed by third parties and information
available on such sites is provided by the current employees and is not
sanitized before it is made available to job seekers.
In the present conceptual study we predict that employee reviews
available on company independent sites will provide more realistic
information that is both positive and negative features associated with
the job and organization, as they are most closely associated with the
job. Moreover information provided by current employees is predicted to
be more credible in terms of expertise and trustworthiness. Realistic
information from a credible source gives the job applicant the
provisions of self-selecting himself/herself out in case the demands of
the job and organization doesn't meet the requirements of the j ob
applicant. We may infer that providing realistic information facilitates
perceived fit perceptions between candidate and job and candidate and
organization (P-O and P-J Fit). Therefore the present study tries to
address these questions by giving a conceptual framework of whether or
not company independent sites provide more realistic information,
whether they provide better P-O and P-J fit perceptions and credibility.
And also how each of these variables affects organizational
attractiveness.
Implications and future research
The present study tries to fill gaps in recruitment literature in
few ways:
1) Job seekers initial perceptions about the organizations are very
important as it would decide if the job seekers will keep the
organization in the consideration set. This research would contribute to
the recruitment literature by providing knowledge about using word of
mouth as a source of providing recruitment related information.
2) Despite of the enormous impact of internet on recruitment
practices, there is lack of research on web based sources of employment
information. The research that has investigated the influence of
Internet on word of mouth of recruitment has mainly investigated the
role of recruitment websites, which is completely company dependent
(Cable, Turban 2001).
3) The present framework will add to literature by examining the
impact of social media or social networking websites on employer
attractiveness. It will examine the impact of employee testimonials
provided on corporate websites (company dependent sources) and social
media tools (company independent). Recruitment research has majorly
focused on post hire outcomes like job performance, turnover etc.,
however how recruitment activities influence pre hire outcomes like
attractiveness towards the organization has largely been ignored.
4) This paper presents a conceptual framework on how company
independent sites can influence organizational attractiveness by
providing more realistic information, better-fit perceptions and
increased perceived credibility. One of the managerial implications of
this would be it would help to increase organizational awareness about
the use and importance of word of mouth or employee testimonials as a
way of providing recruitment related information. Often organizations
have limited funds with respect to recruitment related activities; this
study would help the organizations to channelize the funds in sources,
which are perceived to be most credible and perceived to provide more
realistic information to the job seeker. Job seeker's assessment of
the organizational image begins at an early stage much before they
actually come in direct contact with the organizations. Providing word
of mouth information or employee testimonials on company independent
sources can improve and modify the image perceptions about the
organization. Future research can test these propositions and check if
the predictions are confirmed. Future research can also test the impact
of various company independent sources like chat-rooms, blogs and their
relative importance in organizational attractiveness. The research on
complementary effect of both traditional recruitment and recruitment
through social media is one area which is scarce and is at its infancy.
Caption: Fig. 1. Proposed framework
doi:10.3846/btp.2014.404
References
Allen, D. G.; Scotter, J. R.; Otondo, R. F. 2004. Recruitment
communication media: impact on prehire outcomes, Personnel Psychology
57(1): 143-171. http://dx.doi.Org/10.llll/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02487.x
Allen, D. G.; Biggane, J. E.; Pitts, M.; Otondo, R.; Van Scotter,
J. 2013. Reactions to recruitment web sites: visual and verbal
attention, attraction, and intentions to pursue employment, Journal of
Business and Psychology 28(3): 263-285.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/sl0869-012-9281-6
Barber, A. E. 1998. Recruiting employees: individual and
organizational perspectives. Sage Publications, Inc.
Bondarouk, T.; Ruel, H.; Weekhout, W. 2012. Employer branding and
its effect on organizational attractiveness via the World Wide Web:
results of quantitative and qualitative studies combined, in 4th
International e-HRM Conference on Innovation, Creativity and e-HRM,
28-29 March 2012, Nottingham Trent University, UK.
Breaugh, J. A.; Starke, M. 2000. Research on employee recruitment:
so many studies, so many remaining questions, Journal of Management
26(3): 405-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600303
Breaugh, J. A. 2008. Employee recruitment: current knowledge and
important areas for future research, Human Resource Management Review
18(3): 103-118. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.003
Briones, R. L.; Kuch, B.; Liu, B. F.; Jin, Y. 2011. Keeping up with
the digital age: how the American Red Cross uses social media to build
relationships, Public Relations Review 37(1): 37-43.
http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.006
Cable, D. M.; Judge, T. A. 1996. Person-organization fit, job
choice decisions, and organizational entry, Organizational Behavior and
Human Decision Processes 67(3): 294-311.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0081
Cable, D. M.; Turban, D. B. 2001. Establishing the dimensions,
sources and value of job seekers' employer knowledge during
recruitment, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management
20:115-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(01)20002-4
Cable, D. M.; Yu, K. Y. T. 2006. Managing job seekers'
organizational image beliefs: the role of media richness and media
credibility, Journal of Applied Psychology 91(4): 828-840.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.9E4.828
Cappelli, P. 2001. On-line recruiting, Harvard Business Review
79(3): 139-146.
Clark, L. A.; Roberts, S. J. 2010. Employer's use of social
networking sites: a socially irresponsible practice, Journal of Business
Ethics 95(4): 507-525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/sl0551-010-0436-y
Cober, R. T.; Brown, D. J.; Keeping, L. M.; Levy, P. E. 2004.
Recruitment on the net: how do organizational Web site characteristics
influence, Journal of Management 30(5): 623-646.
http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.03.001
Dellarocas, C. 2003. The digitization of word of mouth: promise and
challenges of online feedback mechanisms, Management science 49(10):
1407-1424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1407.17308
Dineen, B. R.; Ash, S. R.; Noe, R. A. 2002. A web of applicant
attraction: person-organization fit in the context of Webbased
recruitment, Journal of Applied Psychology 87(4): 723.
http://dx.doi.Org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.723
Fisher, C. D.; Ilgen, D. R.; Hoyer, W. D. 1979. Source credibility,
information favorability, and job offer acceptance, Academy of
Management Journal 22(1): 94-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/255481
Girard, A.; Fallery, B.; Rodhain, E 2013. Integration of social
media in recruitment: a delphi study, Advanced Series in Management 12:
97-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1877-6361(2013)0000012009
Kaplan, A. M.; Haenlein, M. 2010. Users of the world, unite! The
challenges and opportunities of Social Media, Business horizons 53(1):
59-68. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
Kristof, A. L. 1996. Person-organization fit: an integrative review
of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications, Personnel
psychology 49(1): 1-49.
http://dx.doi.Org/10.llll/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x
Lauver, K. J.; Kristof-Brown, A. 2001. Distinguishing between
employees' perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit,
Journal of Vocational Behavior 59(3): 454-470.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1807
Park, N.; Kee, K. F.; Valenzuela, S. 2009. Being immersed in social
networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and
social outcomes, CyberPsychology & Behavior 12(6); 729-733.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0003
Perloff, R. M. 1993. Third-person effect research 1983-1992: a
review and synthesis, International Journal of Public Opinion Research
5(2): 167-184. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1093/ijpor/5.2.167
Pornpitakpan, C. 2004. The persuasiveness of source credibility: a
critical review of five decades' evidence, Journal of Applied
Social Psychology 34(2): 243-281.
http://dx.doi.Org/10.llll/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
Rynes, S. L.; Barber, A. E. 1990. Applicant attraction strategies:
an organizational perspective, Academy of Management Review 15(2):
286-310.
Rynes, S. L.; Bretz, R. D.; Gerhart, B. 1991. The importance of
recruitment in job choice: a different way of looking, Personnel
Psychology 44(3): 487-521.
http://dx.doi.Org/10.llll/j.1744-6570.1991.tb02402.x
Thorsteinson, T. J.; Palmer, E. M.; Wulff, C.; Anderson, A. 2004.
Too good to be true? Using realism to enhance applicant attraction,
Journal of Business and Psychology 19(1): 125-137.
http://dx.doi.Org/10.1023/B:JOBU.0000040276.75748.b9
Van Hoye, G.; Lievens, F. 2007. Investigating Web-based recruitment
sources: employee testimonials vs word-of-mouse, International Journal
of Selection and Assessment 15(4): 372-382.
http://dx.doi.Org/10.llll/j.1468-2389.2007.00396.x
Vicknair, J., etai. 2010. The use of social networking websites as
a recruiting tool for employers, American Journal of Business Education
(AJBE) 3(11): 7.
Walker, H. J., et al. 2009. Displaying employee testimonials on
recruitment web sites: effects of communication media, employee race,
and job seeker race on organizational attraction and information
credibility, Journal of Applied Psychology 94(5): 1354-1364.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014964
Waring, R. L.; Buchanan, F. R. 2010. Social networking Web sites:
the legal and ethical aspects of pre-employment screening and employee
surveillance, Journal of Human Resources Education 4(2): 14-23.
Wanous, J. P., et al. 1992. The effects of met expectations on
newcomer attitudes and behaviors: a review and metaanalysis, Journal of
Applied Psychology 77(3): 288-297.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.773.288
Williamson, I. O.; Lepak, D. P.; King, J. 2003. The effect of
company recruitment web site orientation on individuals'
perceptions of organizational attractiveness, Journal of Vocational
Behavior 63(2): 242-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00043-5
Tavleen KAUR (1), Ritesh Kumar DUBEY (2)
IBS Hyderabad, Survey No. 156/157, Dontanapally Village,
Shankerpalli, Maudai, Ranga Reddy District,
Hyderabad-501504, India
E-mails: (1) tavleenkaur@ibsindia.org (corresponding author); (2)
riteshdubey@ibsindia.org
Received 10 December 2013; accepted 27 February 2014
Tavieen KAUR. Research Scholar of Dept, of Human Resource
Management, Faculty of Management, IFHE University, Hyderabad. Research
Interests: Web based recruitment, Employer Branding.
Ritesh Kumar DUBEY. Research Scholar of Dept, of Finance, Faculty
of Management, IFHE University, Hyderabad. Research Interests:
Behavioral Finance, Corporate Finance.