The Gonne-Yeats Letters: 1893-1938.
King, Daniel Patrick
A more unlikely and enduring friendship could hardly be imagined.
Their political differences were profound. W. B. Yeats, perhaps the
greatest of the English-language poets of the century, while not
illiberal in political matters, represented landed Protestant interests
as an Irish senator. Maud Gonne, an Irish Catholic revolutionary,
inspired some of Yeats's best poetry. They met in 1889. She was
twenty-two that year, when she conceived the first of two children by a
French politician who had promised her marriage after he divorced his
wife. He was twenty-three, already a polished and disciplined writer,
when Gonne called upon the Yeats family in London, of which incident
Yeats later wrote, "The troubling of my life began."
They both believed in spiritualism and embarked upon a "mystical
marriage" which was to last until Yeats's death in 1939. A
lively correspondence developed and endured through a world war, the
Irish troubles, and a world tottering toward another cataclysmic
conflict. Yeats proposed marriage to Gonne several times shortly after
they met and again in 1916; she insisted, however, that theirs was to
remain a mystic marriage. She wed Major John MacBride, an Irish
revolutionary, with whom she had one son and whom she divorced shortly
thereafter. Major MacBride, a drunk and a "blackguard," was
executed after the Easter Rising.
Gonne's daughter Iseult also refused Yeats's marriage
proposal, and he later wed Georgie Hyde Lees. He won the Nobel Prize in
Literature in 1923, and his last letter to Gonne was dated 22 August
1938. He died in France and was interred there, as the coming war
prevented an Irish burial. Gonne agitated (along with other Irish
nationalists) for his reburial in Ireland, which occurred in 1948. She
died in 1953, after publishing the first part of her autobiography and
with the second part uncompleted.
The volume's title is somewhat misleading, albeit
understandable. Of 402 letters, only 29 were written by Yeats. The bulk
of his correspondence to Gonne was destroyed along with the contents of
her house when it was raided by Free State soldiers. We are thus left
with an intriguing, one-sided dialogue, fondly wishing for the other
half. There are, of course, other sources: Yeats's Memoirs,
Autobiographies, and Mythologies as well as his letters to other people
to fill the void for the serious researcher. What we have here is a
magnificently detailed half-century of Irish life, complete with
political intrigue, literary images, and the mundane day-to-day problems
of illness, divorce, and child-rearing. In the final analysis, one is
left with Maud Gonne's story, and it is slightly frustrating to
read her constant refrain, "Thank you for your letter."
Did their marriage remain mystical? One of the editors (Norman
Jeffares, a Yeats scholar) thinks not, citing the change in salutation
around 1908 from "My dear Willie" to "Dearest."
However, this conjecturing, while intriguing, seems to fail, for within
months "Dear Willie" resumes. Although coeditor Anna MacBride
White (one of Gonne's grandchildren) admits in her prologue that
neither Gonne's autobiography nor her letters are revealing of her
personality or relationships, the letters contained in this book are
informative. Much of the correspondence is brief and perfunctory; other
letters deal at length with substantive matters. The increasingly sharp
tone of the letters suggests that the friendship deteriorated because of
a chasm of political differences. There is in Gonne's letters an
undertone of vituperative and unexplained condemnation of all who
differed with her in matters of politics and religion.
Gonne was not modest and evidently was concerned about her public
image. In 1905 she asked Yeats not to "trouble about watching
papers for me. I have ordered a press agency to send me every thing
where my name occurs for the present & the bundle of cuttings I
receive every day are surprisingly large & require a certain amount
of resolution to read." "I started the Sinn Fein Movement," she wrote in 1907, and later, "I am writing a very
long & very egotistical letter." She clearly had her likes and
dislikes - "I don't like American women" (1908) - and in
a heated exchange of letters with Yeats in 1927 she wrote: "I held
that Dreyfus was an uninteresting Jew & too much money was spent on
his cause for it to be an honest cause & that greater injustice
triumphed every day when poor men were sent to jail for the theft of
food or clothing for their families & I would prefer to raise the
cry for them. . . . Being a nationalist, I sympathized with French
nationalists who objected to the Jews & international finance
interfering in their country & upsetting their institutions."
Gonne was not lacking in strong opinions and certainly had no fear of
acting on them. In 1897 Yeats and Gonne were taking tea at the National
Club in Dublin when outside a riot ensued protesting Queen
Victoria's Diamond Jubilee: "Maud Gonne got [up] and said she
was going out and someone else said she would be hurt. I told them to
lock the door and keep her in. . . . I refused to let her out unless she
explained what she meant to do." Gonne wrote Yeats later: "Do
you know that to be a coward for those we love is only a degree less bad
than to be a coward for oneself. The latter I know well you are not, the
former you know well you are. It is therefore impossible for us ever to
do any work together where there is likely to be excitement or physical
danger & now let us never allude to this stupid subject again."
When Yeats sent his poem "Easter 1916" to Gonne, she
advised him in a letter dated 8 November 1916: "No I don't
like your poem, it isn't worthy of you & above all it
isn't worthy of the subject - Though it reflects your present state
of mind perhaps, it isn't quite sincere enough for you who have
studied philosophy & know something of history know quite well that
sacrifice has never yet turned a heart to stone though it has
immortalized many & through it alone mankind can rise to God."
A reading of these letters reveals the eloquence and brilliance of
the orator for Ireland that Maud Gonne had become. A contemporary, Mary
Colum, described her demeanor in facing an angry crowd as "the most
beautiful, the most heroic-looking human bering I have ever seen before
or since." In the end Gonne "always counted on [Yeats's]
friendship and it has never failed me." His loyal yet sometimes
cutting opposition to her remained sincere. In this regard Yeats wrote
in 1927, "We will never change each other's politics. They are
too deeply rooted in our characters."
Anna MacBride White obtained the letters after they were returned to
her grandmother by Mrs. Yeats around 1942. Undated and jumbled in large
manila envelopes, they were roughly sorted with the time periods written
on the flap in Yeats's handwriting. In the hands of White and
Jeffares, readers are able to see Maud Gonne as more than the almost
mythical figure in Irish politics she has become to many. The seventy
pages of editorial notes clearly define the political, economic, and
social context of the times. The result is a valuable picture of two
uncommon people searching for that "spiritual peace which made the
broken toys & the fallen gods seem insignificant." "In
that peace," she wrote in 1913, "I found I had not changed the
ideals of my young days: only I saw that most of the efforts I had made
to realize them had been mere playing with sand."
Daniel Patrick King Whitefish Bay, Wi.