The Church in Council: Conciliar Movements, Religious Practice, and the Papacy from Nicaea to Vatican II.
Worcester, Thomas
THE CHURCH IN COUNCIL: CONCILIAR MOVEMENTS, RELIGIOUS PRACTICE, AND
THE PAPACY FROM NICAEA TO VATICAN II. By Norman Tanner. International
Library of Historical Studies, vol. 72. New York: I. B. Tauris, 2011.
Pp. xi + 249. $92.
A collection of Tanner's previously published articles,
essays, and other shorter works on the history of church councils, the
volume offers a concise and accessible overview of conciliar practices
and accomplishments. T. divides 21 councils into eight of the
"Early Church" (Nicaea to Constantinople IV); ten in the
"Middle Ages" (Lateran I to Lateran V); and three for the
"Modern Era" (Trent to Vatican II). He stresses that the first
group of councils were called by emperors or empresses, did their work
in Greek, dealt mainly with doctrinal questions, and were primarily
Eastern, or even Asian: the medieval councils were Western and Latin,
dealt principally with discipline, and most were called by popes: the
three "modem" councils were all called by popes, though the
degree of papal direction of them varied, as did their doctrinal and/or
disciplinary purposes. At Vatican II, while Western European bishops
still dominated the council, the rest of the world was growing in
representation.
Ecclesiological concerns and an eye to the future undergird this
historical narrative. T. calls councils "a good antidote to
obsession with the papacy" (172), and he gently and persuasively
points out that future councils could play a major role in promoting
Christian unity as well as interreligious dialogue; such councils may,
he suggests, take place in Manila, Delhi, New York, or indeed anywhere
in the world.
More judicious editing would have made this fine volume even
better, especially by weeding out needless repetition. At least six
times T. contrasts the British parliament and its principle of majority
rule, even if a majority is extraordinarily slender, with a conciliar
tradition of unanimous consent, or of at least nearly unanimous
agreement. A couple of times T. uses a cricket metaphor for explaining
the role of the pope in the first millennium; an impenetrable allusion,
I suspect, for most American readers. Quibbles aside, T.'s book is
well worth the attention of students and scholars alike.
THOMAS WORCESTER, S.J.
College of the Holy Cross,
Worcester, MA