The Garden of God: A Theological Cosmology.
Warner, Keith Douglass
THE GARDEN OF GOD: A THEOLOGICAL COSMOLOGY. By Alejandro
Garcia-Rivera. Theology and the Sciences. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2009.
Pp. xvi + 157. $22.
Garcia-Rivera advances a set of compelling arguments for
revisioning theological cosmology in light of recent scientific
discoveries and in response to the reality of human alienation from the
created world. Its title plays off of Augustine's City of God, for
G. presents the image of garden as the proper metaphor for our
relationship with the cosmos. G. advances Teilhard de Chardin as a
harbinger for such a new cosmology, arguing that his understanding of
the role of humans in the cosmos and Christ's significance to the
cosmos have become more compelling in light of recent advances in
scientific cosmology and evolutionary biology (25).
G. ambitiously formulates his notion of theological cosmology to
serve as a synthetic framework for articulating a philosophy of nature,
a theological esthetics, a theology of suffering, a renewed theological
anthropology, and a cosmic Christology (10). To do so requires revisions
to Teilhard's theology: redirecting Teilhard's focus from the
future to dwelling now on the land; a fresh perspective on the Holy
Spirit to support a cosmic Christology; and a recovery of beauty in
religious thought. Adapting Robert Russell's Creative Mutual
Interaction as a methodology (55), G.'s theological cosmology
stimulates a fresh approach to dialogue between theology and science,
overcoming science's tendency toward reductionism, while compelling
theology to incorporate scientific discovery. Fostering but sustaining
the tension between these approaches, G. argues, is critical to a
vigorous theological cosmology. He critiques as deficient any scientific
cosmology that is formulated merely in terms of scientific discovery,
for theology is necessary to help humans find their place in the cosmos
revealed by science.
G.'s argument is an intellectually robust and theologically
grounded cosmology, sufficiently supple to accommodate the dynamic
implications of scientific discovery, but also able to challenge myopic cosmologies constructed on science alone. G. provides a refreshing
integration of diverse scholarly developments of interest to those
pursuing questions in environmental theology, Teilhard studies,
theological esthetics, and science-religion dialogues. The book is solid
theological scholarship, yet it is accessible for advanced undergraduate
students.
KEITH DOUGLASS WARNER, O.F.M.
Santa Clara University, Calif.