首页    期刊浏览 2025年08月17日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:THE DISSENT OF THE GOVERNED: A MEDITATION ON LAW, RELIGION, AND LOYALTY.
  • 作者:BUCKLEY, THOMAS E.
  • 期刊名称:Theological Studies
  • 印刷版ISSN:0040-5639
  • 出版年度:1998
  • 期号:December
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Sage Publications, Inc.
  • 摘要:I suspect John Courtney Murray would enjoy this book. In this expanded version of the Massey Lectures at Harvard in 1995, Carter celebrates reasoned dissent and urges the need for "public moral dialogue" (98). Choosing examples from familiar conflicts between religion and law, he argues cogently that those in control of government today too often delegitimize the perspectives of groups, particularly religious communities, who strive to promote an alternative vision to the secular bias dominating politics, the media, and the courts. He identifies the chief villain as "liberal constitutionalism" (19), the view that an omnicompetent central government should foster a homogenized national community with uniform values and equal rights for all.
  • 关键词:Book reviews;Books

THE DISSENT OF THE GOVERNED: A MEDITATION ON LAW, RELIGION, AND LOYALTY.


BUCKLEY, THOMAS E.


THE DISSENT OF THE GOVERNED: A MEDITATION ON LAW, RELIGION, AND LOYALTY. By Stephen L. Carter. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University, 1998. Pp. xi + 167. $19.95.

I suspect John Courtney Murray would enjoy this book. In this expanded version of the Massey Lectures at Harvard in 1995, Carter celebrates reasoned dissent and urges the need for "public moral dialogue" (98). Choosing examples from familiar conflicts between religion and law, he argues cogently that those in control of government today too often delegitimize the perspectives of groups, particularly religious communities, who strive to promote an alternative vision to the secular bias dominating politics, the media, and the courts. He identifies the chief villain as "liberal constitutionalism" (19), the view that an omnicompetent central government should foster a homogenized national community with uniform values and equal rights for all.

But what about the rights of dissenters? Even disobedience can contribute to moral progress, C. insists, as Martin Luther King and the civil rights protests demonstrated. Ignoring the religious principles underlying that movement, secular liberals embraced King and his followers. Yet they reject out of hand the arguments of anti-abortion and voucher advocates. C. wants religious values brought into policy discussions, but finds the witness most convincing when shown in speech and example rather than in electoral politics.

While not choosing sides in the voucher debate, C. argues that if the government provides monies for private education, religious freedom demands that it include church-related schools as well. Indeed, C. reserves his most withering critique for the Supreme Court's failure sufficiently to accommodate religious belief; and his review of recent church-state cases makes particularly interesting reading. To continue a civil polity of indifference or hostility toward religious values, he warns, threatens to transform dissent into disallegiance. This gracefully written book should prove useful for anyone interested in a civil argument over contemporary public affairs.

THOMAS E. BUCKLEY, S.J.

Jesuit School of Theol., Berkeley
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有