首页    期刊浏览 2025年03月12日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Paul Cullen, John Henry Newman, and the Catholic University of Ireland, 1845-1865.
  • 作者:Thompson, David M.
  • 期刊名称:Church History
  • 印刷版ISSN:0009-6407
  • 出版年度:2004
  • 期号:March
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:American Society of Church History
  • 摘要:Paul Cullen, John Henry Newman, and the Catholic University of Ireland, 1845-1865. By Colin Barr. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 2003. xvi + 288 pp. $30.00 paper.
  • 关键词:Books

Paul Cullen, John Henry Newman, and the Catholic University of Ireland, 1845-1865.


Thompson, David M.


Paul Cullen, John Henry Newman, and the Catholic University of Ireland, 1845-1865. By Colin Barr. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 2003. xvi + 288 pp. $30.00 paper.

Newman's Idea of the University is remembered long after the Catholic University of Ireland that prompted it has been forgotten, and Archbishop Cullen is often blamed for Newman's resignation and the University's failure. Colin Barr reappraises the roles of both men, showing that Cullen was the prime mover behind the Catholic University while at the Irish College in Rome, that he picked Newman for the job of Rector and persuaded him to accept it, and that the reasons for the failure of the University were more complex than often supposed. The story is firmly set in its Irish context and Cullen's concern at the readiness of some Irish bishops to compromise with the "godless colleges," founded by the British government in 1845. Although Cullen, as Archbishop of Armagh and later Dublin, sought to mobilize the bishops behind the University, some remained sceptical and were alienated by his recruitment of English (rather than Irish) teachers, especially Archbishop MacHale of Tuam. This alienation led to a failure of financial support. Newman's treatment of the rectorship as a part-time job was a further difficulty, and the resulting tension led to his resignation. But failure to recruit students was the underlying problem, principally because there was no university charter. Palmerston's opposition left few political opportunities to secure one from the government before 1865. The book is a valuable reminder of the significance of institutional problems and the dangers of a purely personal interpretation.

David M. Thompson

Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge

联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有