Bailey, Janies P.: Rethinking Poverty: Income, Assets, and the Catholic Social Justice Tradition.
Quirk, Patrick
BAILEY, Janies P. Rethinking Poverty: Income, Assets, and the
Catholic Social Justice Tradition. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame
Press, 2010. 176 pp. Paper, $30.00--This book seeks to redress the lack
of emphasis on the idea of asset building as a means of poverty relief
in current debates. Professor Bailey's main thesis is that there is
too much attention paid to income inequality at the expense of the lost
tradition of "asset development for the poor."
Since the Catholic Church teaches that economics a not a
value-neutral science, Bailey's approach is first to ask why we
need asset building for the poor and then to introduce the major
concepts of Catholic social thought in relation to property, ownership,
asset-building policy, and the common good. Chapter two traces a line of
thought that extends from Pope Leo XIII's stress on the virtues of
ownership through Pius IX's affirmation that "private property
is consistent with the natural law and that ownership implies both
individual and social rights and responsibilities." He goes on to
discuss, perhaps too briefly, John XXIII's and Paul VI's
development of a global vision and rounds out the chapter with John Paul
II's seminal social encyclicals (Labomm Exercens, Sollicitudo Rei
Socialis, and Centesimus Annus) as well as that pontiffs concern for the
partial redefinition of ownership in an information age.
Chapter three is entitled "Assets and Human Capabilities"
and begins with a quote from Martha Nussbaum's Frontiers of
Justice. At this point, the author sets forth a "complementary
conception" of social justice by using Nussbaum's
"capabilities approach" and her "thick, vague"
theory of the good. A helpful table defines the "Capabilities for a
Good Human Life" by using quotations from Nussbaum's work. The
chapter then draws on the work of Michael Sherridan, whose inductive
approach to measuring economic health seeks to place public policy at
the center of an asset-building approach to poverty relief. The
behavioral and psychological benefits of property ownership are
expounded upon in a thought-provoking way, as is the "future
orientation" of asset accumulation and the pulling power of hope.
Numerous comparisons are again made to the work of Nussbaum and also
with that of welfare economist Amartya Sen.
Chapter four focuses on asset discrimination, commencing with
Lincoln's Homestead Act of 1862, the sharecropper system, the
Freedman's Bureau, the New Deal, and more modern issues with the
Federal Housing Authority and the G.I. Bill. The discussion of
"red-lining" by private banks--a discriminatory lending
practice--is especially interesting.
Chapter five is entitled "Toward Inclusive Ownership"; it
outlines some concrete proposals for asset development for the poor,
including tax changes, individual development accounts, child savings
accounts, and the recent American Saving for Personal Investment,
Retirement, and Education Act (ASPIRE). There are useful comparisons
with programs in other countries as well as a discussion of the
political viability of such schemes. The book concludes with a short
primer on modern Catholic social teaching.
Books on "Catholic economics" are always fraught with
tension between a Church that endorses no particular economic model and
those who seek to fit their economic model into the Church's moral
framework. This book avoids such tension but arguably makes too much of
Nussbaum's compatibility with Catholic social teaching. In light of
the recent work on inequality by Thomas Piketty (Capital in the 21st
Century, 2014), Professor Bailey offers a very useful starting point for
those interested in uplifting the poor in the name of human dignity and
the common good.--Patrick Quirk, Ave Maria School of Law, Australian
Catholic University