首页    期刊浏览 2025年02月22日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Dusing, Klaus. Subjektivitat und Freiheit: untersuchungen zum Idealismus von Kant bis Hegel.
  • 作者:Pozzo, Riccardo
  • 期刊名称:The Review of Metaphysics
  • 印刷版ISSN:0034-6632
  • 出版年度:2004
  • 期号:June
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Philosophy Education Society, Inc.
  • 摘要:DUSING, Klaus. Subjektivitat und Freiheit: Untersuchungen zum Idealismus von Kant bis Hegel. Spekulation und Erfahrung, series II, vol. 47. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 2002. 321 pp. Cloth, 50.00 [euro]--This volume contains nine essays published between 1980 and 1997 by Klaus Dusing, the director of Cologne's Husserl-Archiv. It is divided in four parts: (1) theoretical philosophy in transcendental idealism; (2) theory of subjectivity and metaphysics in speculative idealism; (3) ethics and theory of freedom; and (4) idealistic aesthetics. It is, however, focused in its entirety on the notion of subjectivity from Kant to Heidegger. Philosophical discussions about subjectivity or self-consciousness are enjoying a renewed success, as Dusing notes in his introductory essay on the notion of subjectivity in classical and contemporary German philosophy (p. 7-32). But this comes after a long period of dearth, during which it was mainstream to decompose the unity of the self-consciousness into a complex of conscious or preconscious lived experiences (p. 7). Dusing does not question the nature of the brain; his wish is to take a stance on what separates consciousness from self-consciousness or spirit, which English speakers might want to think of also in terms of mind (p. 11-12). Obviously, Kant and Hegel come handy for such an endeavor. In fact, the basis of all contemporary theories of self-consciousness and subjectivity is provided by Kant's theories of apperception and imagination. Kant does not conceive of thinking as an anonymous process. He insists on the "I think," namely, on the unity of self-consciousness (p. 21). Kant did not, however, specify how is it possible for logical forms and categories to think through this "I think," which is their constitutive center of origin (p. 22). In other words, how can both pure logic and the theory of pure subjectivity claim to be founding elements, if they cannot be opened up by thought itself? The young Fichte and the young Schelling based their philosophical attempts on an interpretation of the theory of subjectivity in terms of transcendental idealism, which, however, leaves unexplained how one should provide a scientific treatment for transcendental idealism that implies those determinations and laws of pure logic that transcendental idealism cannot do without.

    It was Hegel who gave the most satisfying answer. While writing his logic in terms of a theory of pure subjectivity, Hegel followed a completely new strain. He shows (1) that philosophy is about the gradual constitution (and restitution) of pure subjectivity, so that (2) the whole deduction of the categories ends up by being nothing else but the self-deployment of pure thought of itself in its determinations (pp. 23). The first part of the volume includes papers on Kant's theory of time (pp. 35-88), on Kant's theory of imagination (pp. 89-110), and on Kant and Heidegger on the circle of self-consciousness (pp. 111-40); the second part contains papers on constitution and structure of the identity of the ego (p. 143-80), on Hegel's critique of Kant's theory of apperception (pp. 143-80), and on negative theology in Schelling and Hegel (pp. 181-207); the third part includes papers on spontaneity and freedom in Kant (pp. 211-35), Hegel on Plato's Republic and Laws (pp. 236-50); the fourth part has papers on Schelling's aesthetics of genius (pp. 253-74), and on tragedy in Holderlin and Hegel (pp. 275-321). Dusing thus provides a very welcome integration and some afterthoughts to his milestone book on the role of subjectivity in Hegel's logic (see Das Problem der Subjektivitat in Hegels Logik: Systematische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zum Prinzip des Idealismus und der Dialektik, third edition [Bonn: Bouvier, 1995]).--Riccardo Pozzo, University of Verona.
  • 关键词:Books

Dusing, Klaus. Subjektivitat und Freiheit: untersuchungen zum Idealismus von Kant bis Hegel.


Pozzo, Riccardo


DUSING, Klaus. Subjektivitat und Freiheit: Untersuchungen zum Idealismus von Kant bis Hegel. Spekulation und Erfahrung, series II, vol. 47. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 2002. 321 pp. Cloth, 50.00 [euro]--This volume contains nine essays published between 1980 and 1997 by Klaus Dusing, the director of Cologne's Husserl-Archiv. It is divided in four parts: (1) theoretical philosophy in transcendental idealism; (2) theory of subjectivity and metaphysics in speculative idealism; (3) ethics and theory of freedom; and (4) idealistic aesthetics. It is, however, focused in its entirety on the notion of subjectivity from Kant to Heidegger. Philosophical discussions about subjectivity or self-consciousness are enjoying a renewed success, as Dusing notes in his introductory essay on the notion of subjectivity in classical and contemporary German philosophy (p. 7-32). But this comes after a long period of dearth, during which it was mainstream to decompose the unity of the self-consciousness into a complex of conscious or preconscious lived experiences (p. 7). Dusing does not question the nature of the brain; his wish is to take a stance on what separates consciousness from self-consciousness or spirit, which English speakers might want to think of also in terms of mind (p. 11-12). Obviously, Kant and Hegel come handy for such an endeavor. In fact, the basis of all contemporary theories of self-consciousness and subjectivity is provided by Kant's theories of apperception and imagination. Kant does not conceive of thinking as an anonymous process. He insists on the "I think," namely, on the unity of self-consciousness (p. 21). Kant did not, however, specify how is it possible for logical forms and categories to think through this "I think," which is their constitutive center of origin (p. 22). In other words, how can both pure logic and the theory of pure subjectivity claim to be founding elements, if they cannot be opened up by thought itself? The young Fichte and the young Schelling based their philosophical attempts on an interpretation of the theory of subjectivity in terms of transcendental idealism, which, however, leaves unexplained how one should provide a scientific treatment for transcendental idealism that implies those determinations and laws of pure logic that transcendental idealism cannot do without.

It was Hegel who gave the most satisfying answer. While writing his logic in terms of a theory of pure subjectivity, Hegel followed a completely new strain. He shows (1) that philosophy is about the gradual constitution (and restitution) of pure subjectivity, so that (2) the whole deduction of the categories ends up by being nothing else but the self-deployment of pure thought of itself in its determinations (pp. 23). The first part of the volume includes papers on Kant's theory of time (pp. 35-88), on Kant's theory of imagination (pp. 89-110), and on Kant and Heidegger on the circle of self-consciousness (pp. 111-40); the second part contains papers on constitution and structure of the identity of the ego (p. 143-80), on Hegel's critique of Kant's theory of apperception (pp. 143-80), and on negative theology in Schelling and Hegel (pp. 181-207); the third part includes papers on spontaneity and freedom in Kant (pp. 211-35), Hegel on Plato's Republic and Laws (pp. 236-50); the fourth part has papers on Schelling's aesthetics of genius (pp. 253-74), and on tragedy in Holderlin and Hegel (pp. 275-321). Dusing thus provides a very welcome integration and some afterthoughts to his milestone book on the role of subjectivity in Hegel's logic (see Das Problem der Subjektivitat in Hegels Logik: Systematische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zum Prinzip des Idealismus und der Dialektik, third edition [Bonn: Bouvier, 1995]).--Riccardo Pozzo, University of Verona.

联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有