Augustine. On the Trinity, Books 8-15.
Meconi, David Vincent
Edited by Gareth B. Matthews and translated by Stephen McKenna.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. xxxiv + 227 pp. Cloth,
$55.00; paper, $20.00--St. Augustine tells us that he worked on the De
Trinitate (DT) on and off between 400 and 416. The aim of this work is
basically twofold: to examine both how the absolute monotheism of
Christianity can speak of three divine persons (books 1-7) as well as to
examine how humanity images this triune God (8-15). A rare treasure of
theology and psychology, the DT has shaped most of the West's talk
about the Trinity. For how we read Scripture's often oblique
references to the Trinity, how we understand the Trinitarian relations
within God as well as what it means that the human person is created in
this divine image, have been largely determined by Augustine. Given the
importance and influence of the DT, it is curious that an English
edition did not appear until the late nineteenth century when Philip
Schaff included Arthur West Haddan's translation in the 1887
Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers series. Since then only
two more full English translations have appeared: Stephen McKenna's
in 1963 and Edmund Hill's in 1991.
Relying upon McKenna's translation, Gareth B. Matthews of the
University of Massachusetts at Amherst has edited Augustine's DT
for the Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy series. This
edition contains a short introduction by Matthews (pp. ix-xxix), a
suggested list of works for further reading (pp. xxxi-xxxii), a summary
of DT 1-7 (pp. xxxiii-xxxiv), followed by the whole of books 8-15 (pp.
3-224), which is primarily where Augustine strives to show how the human
mind reflects its triune creator. Matthews opens by examining eleven
major points found in these latter books: fides quaerens intellectum,
the problem of other minds, mental trinities, mental language, mind-body
dualism, sense perception, illumination, happiness, the learning of
language, divine simplicity, and skepticism and the cogito (pp.
xii-xxvi). These sections are brief explorations into the complex themes
running throughout the DT and Matthews repeatedly highlights the
originality of Augustine's thinking here, careful to show how he
goes well beyond former non-Christian philosophers when speaking about
God as well as beyond other theologians who set out to elucidate the
Trinity (for example, Hilary of Poitiers and Marius Victorinus).
Matthews's introduction pays special attention to the
influence Augustine played on later thought. For example, DT 8 taught
Anselm the interplay between faith and knowledge in theistic inquiry.
Augustine here relies on mental representation to free the searcher from
the problematic paradox of loving someone he has not yet met: even to be
able to think of someone (for example, the Apostle Paul), is enough to
"know" him enough to begin to love him. Descartes receives the
most attention in the examination of Augustine's influence.
Although he denies having first read Augustine's version of the
cogito as found at DT 15--si fallor, sum--Descartes's reliance on
the move from mental certainty to existential actuality is clearly
Augustinian in formulation.
In picking up this work, two major problems quickly become obvious.
Matthews's previous books and essays on Augustine have been as
comprehensive as they have been illuminating but here he unfortunately
limits his commentary to brief sound bites; in fact, his entire
commentary is limited to only twenty-one pages. The reader is left
wanting to hear more from him. Second, one wonders why Cambridge decided
simply to reissue McKenna's 1963 translation as found in the
Catholic University of America's The Fathers of the Church series.
Matthews justifies this move by stating that other available
translations are either "antiquated" or too free in their
renderings (p. xxxi). Despite this criticism, however, Edmund
Hill's The Trinity (Brooklyn: New City Press, 1991), with its
extensive commentary and helpful notes, much better captures the
language and intent of Augustine. There are not many philosophical
projects greater than examining how the human person mirrors the divine
and, as such, the Cambridge series is to be commended for including
Augustine's DT, but this classic deserves more attention than they
are apparently willing to give.--David Vincent Meconi, S.J., University
of Innsbruck.