The world is our parish: remembering the 1919 Protestant missionary fair.
Anderson, Christopher J.
John Wesley once stated, "The world is my parish," a
phrase that served as a springboard for a dramatic increase in
missionary activity by Methodist mission agencies in Great Britain and
the United States during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
In the summer of 1919 American Methodists took this phrase as the slogan
for an enormous missionary exposition held in Columbus, Ohio. From June
20 to July 13, members of Methodist denominations--including the
Methodist Episcopal Church, the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, and
the Colored Methodist Episcopal Church (since 1954, the Christian
Methodist Episcopal Church)--participated in an international exhibition
showcasing American Methodist missions and the worldwide expansion of
Christianity.
This exhibition--the Centenary Celebration of American Methodist
Missions--was a Protestant world's fair commemorating the 1819
founding of the Missionary Society of the Methodist Episcopal Church.
The exposition also celebrated the legacy of African-American Methodist
itinerant minister John Stewart and his missionary work with the Wyandot
Indian Nation near Upper Sandusky, Ohio. The fair was a
multimillion-dollar event attracting over one million visitors,
including 10,000 Methodist clergy, who could walk through pavilions
displaying the current work of Methodist missionaries from around the
world and who could catch a glimpse of the future by imagining the
potential effects of a Methodist crusade to Christianize many sections
of the world. (1)
The Methodist "World's Fair"
The entire exposition was a vast undertaking, a missionary fair
much larger than any previous U.S. Protestant exhibition. Organizers
staged the Centenary Celebration at the state fairgrounds in Columbus,
which encompassed a large section of land north of downtown between
Eleventh and Seventeenth Avenues and about four blocks east of the
campus of Ohio State University. The fairgrounds contained over 16,000
exhibits representing thirty-seven different countries, including the
United States. (2) Eight large exhibition buildings, normally used to
display agriculture, livestock, and farm implements at the annual Ohio
State Fair, functioned as international pavilions presenting for view
the peoples, landscapes, and material artifacts of countries impacted by
the work of Methodist missionaries in Africa, China, India, Europe,
Latin America, the Far East (including Korea, Japan, and Malaysia), and
the United States.
Prior to the exposition Methodist officials sent word to mission
agencies of the need to gather people and items of material culture for
display at Columbus. As a result, over 500 "natives" were
enlisted, and a number of their homes and hundreds of objects were
collected, all being transported from around the world by ship and train
to the fairgrounds. (3) Visitors at the Centenary Celebration thus could
view the successful expansion of Christianity into foreign fields and
could witness the powerful changes experienced by native peoples through
the means of Methodist missionaries and missionary agencies.
The pavilions re-created scenes of distant lands that most visitors
had only imagined or seen while watching a church missionary lantern
slide show. In the Africa building, for example, visitors could feed
elephants and ride camels through a miniature desert. The Malaysian
Island building contained artifacts and peoples from the Philippine
Islands. One of the most popular displays inside this pavilion was a
mechanical electric village. It displayed a "typical"
Philippine village by using electric power to motorize a series of large
belts. The exhibit depicted automated scenes in miniature, including a
regiment of U.S. troops marching across the island landscape, a working
waterfall, and a small "native" climbing up and down a coconut
tree. (4)
As people entered the India building, they could dip their fingers
into a miniature version of the Ganges River flowing throughout the
pavilion, or they could view Hindu fakirs reclining on a bed of spikes.
Visitors were also able to spend time inside a replica Hindu temple,
complete with statues of local gods, with guides who described how
Methodist missionaries were working toward evangelizing the people of
India. In the lecture room one could also view amateur ethnographic
silent films made by Methodist missionaries that featured the conversion
of Indian spiritual leaders.
The Europe building contained a five-hundred-seat replica of a
destroyed French Protestant cathedral. Visitors could sit on benches and
peer out broken windows to view large painted murals depicting the
destruction of the European landscape as a result of the Great War.
Inside, people could reflect on the horrors of the war and contemplate
the roles they might play in European reconstruction through volunteer
service or financial contribution.
Throughout the day these buildings and exhibits were occupied by
interested visitors and potential donors who wanted to see images from
popular magazines such as National Geographic come to life. Local
newspapers and Methodist periodicals beckoned readers to see for
themselves what was going on at the fairgrounds. If visitors tired of
touring the pavilions, they might enjoy a glass of Coca-Cola or ride the
Ferris wheel, (5) take in a lantern slide show or missionary fill on the
ten-story picture screen, attend a musical pageant and ethnological demonstration put on by foreign Christian converts and American
Methodist volunteers, or even watch a recent Hollywood film. Visitors
also watched parades held daily throughout the grounds or looked to the
skies as World War I airplanes fought in mock air battles and
anti-aircraft guns loaded with blank shot barked out a deafening
response from the grounds below. There was always plenty to do and see
at the missionary exhibition, just as Methodist organizers had
meticulously planned.
Fred B. Smith, a Methodist layman writing for the YMCA periodical
Association Men, noted the multilayered entertainment the Columbus
exposition offered. Smith praised the various modes of the fair, which
"gave an opportunity for enjoying what was the best in a circus, a
county fair, a picnic, grand opera, the drama and the Church--all at one
time." (6) Even visitors from Hollywood were impressed by the scope
of the Methodist fair, which offered Americans the chance to view real
"natives" from distant lands. Motion picture director D. W.
Griffith, following a tour of the pavilions, remarked, "What
particularly impressed me was the wonderful opportunity the Methodist
Centenary Celebration gives the people to visit the entire world.
Extraordinarily impressive are the foreign villages represented where
not 'supers' but real natives brought from foreign lands
demonstrate the daily existence in those countries." (7) For Smith
and Griffith the exposition served as an arena simultaneously for
Methodist entertainment, Christian missionary education, and
ethnographic exhibition.
Early International Missionary Expositions
The Centenary Celebration of American Methodist Missions combined
the exhibition of peoples, artifacts, and technologies seen at
international world's fairs with displays showcasing the effects of
world missions evidenced at earlier European and American Protestant
missionary expositions. The popularity of international expositions in
Chicago (1893), St. Louis (1904), and San Francisco (1915), as well as
missionary expositions in London (1867) and Boston (1911), encouraged
Methodists to plan a further celebration of Protestant missions for
American audiences.
The roots of the U.S. missionary exposition movement can be traced
to a YMCA conference center in Silver Bay, New York, where the Young
People's Missionary Movement (YPMM) was formed in 1902 to promote
education about Protestant missions through Sunday schools and mission
study classes. (8) The YPMM in turn led to the founding of the Young
People's Missionary Union (YPMU), formed in Boston in 1908 by a
small group of missions-minded Protestants.
While the YPMM, through Christian education and weekend retreats,
was successfully emphasizing the need for more missionaries, another
venue geared toward showcasing foreign and home missions had been
prominent in Great Britain for half a century, namely, Protestant
missionary expositions. During the late nineteenth and early twentieth
centuries, such expositions provided British audiences with a chance to
see the success and global reach of missions by placing converted
peoples, their homes, and material artifacts on display in an
interactive museum format. Expositions such as the 1908 "Orient in
London," sponsored by the London Missionary Society, sparked the
interest of U.S. Protestant missionary agencies for holding such an
exhibition in the United States. Those within the New England-based YPMU
also believed that a missionary exposition similar to the London fair
would draw large crowds of missionary supporters and ultimately increase
funding for U.S. mission agencies. As a result, the first U.S.
Protestant missionary exhibition--"The World in Boston: The First
Great Exposition in America of Home and Foreign Missions"--was held
in April and May of 1911 at the Mechanics Building in downtown Boston.
(9)
Planning for the Boston exposition began in 1908. By March of 1909
the YPMU had acquired the support of over fifty Christian organizations
to help with planning and implementing the exposition, including both
the Board of Home Missions and Church Extension and the Board of Foreign
Missions of the Methodist Episcopal Church. The 1911 fair fostered
support for the later 1919 Centenary Celebration as both Methodist
Episcopal Church missionary boards organized display booths and key
Methodist leaders, including S. Earl Taylor and Ralph E. Diffendorfer,
served in leadership roles at "The World in Boston." (10)
In 1910 A. M. Gardner of London was chosen by the YPMU to serve as
general secretary of "The World in Boston" because of his
experience with earlier British missionary expositions. Gardner
immediately went to work designing floor plans and an assortment of
displays including glass curios, wall exhibits, and foreign homes.
Experts from various denominations gathered in Boston to plan exhibits
that showcased the people and domestic activities of countries impacted
by Protestant missionary agencies. The live exhibits and demonstrations
re-created the living conditions of people from Africa, India, and
China. Exposition visitors watched as foreign families prepared meals
and ate dinner, organized and cleaned their homes, and practiced
indigenous religious traditions. Exhibits dedicated to the endeavors of
home missionaries in the United States appeared throughout the building,
giving visitors the chance to view ways in which Protestant missionaries
assisted the Southern Negro and the American Indian. The exposition also
featured a "Hall of Religions," which included exhibits
comparing American Protestantism with the practices of Buddhism,
Hinduism, and Islam. (11)
Following the successful run of the Boston exposition, several
Protestant world's fairs were held in the United States before
World War I, including expositions in Cincinnati and Baltimore in 1912,
and in Chicago in 1913. Each of these fairs showcased the progress of
world missions by exhibiting their success in making Christian converts
and by bringing Western civilization to "uncivilized" (i.e.,
non-Christian) parts of the world.
Planning for the Columbus Fair
By late 1914 much of Europe had become engulfed in conflict,
including nations with many Protestants. As the war became more global
in scope, the effectiveness of Christian foreign and home missions
needed to be reassessed. How might mission agencies effectively
demonstrate that the work of Christian missionaries in foreign lands
could still bring global peace and cultural stability when thousands of
Protestant soldiers were slaughtering each other in trench warfare and
Christian citizens were being killed in European cities? In newspapers
and periodicals Americans read of the destruction and chaos caused by
the Great War, and Christians throughout the United States wondered how
effective as a positive global presence foreign missions actually had
been. Some American Methodist leaders believed that renewed mission
effort was the key and began to discuss the idea of initiating a
national fund drive to raise money for world missions. This campaign
would culminate in 1919 with the Centenary Celebration, a distinctly
Methodist missionary affair that leaders wanted to ensure was larger in
size and broader in scope than any previous Christian missions
exposition.
During the war Methodist executives who had worked at the 1911
Boston exposition continued to discuss the effectiveness of missionary
exhibitions. Methodist leaders firmly believed that the U.S. government
and the American military were "making the world safe for
democracy" by working for worldwide peace, human rights, and
economic prosperity. Yet as Methodist military leaders and soldiers
fought in the fields of Europe, S. Earl Taylor, secretary of the Board
of Foreign Missions, argued there were "things which governments
cannot do" for which the Methodist Episcopal Church had an answer.
In an article for The Centenary Survey of the Board of Foreign Missions,
Taylor declared that the Methodist Church and its missionary agencies
were needed to reinforce "the spiritual and moral forces"
within the United States and to remove "ignorance and
superstition" from foreign lands. Taylor summoned American
Methodists to the task, and Methodist Bishop James W. Bashford seconded
Taylor's claim, stating in the same article, "Nothing can meet
the problem of making them [foreigners] ready [for democracy] but
Christian missions, and in that solution our Church with its World
Program is taking the lead." (12) This "World Program"
evolved into the Centenary Fund Drive.
In 1916 at the Saratoga Springs General Conference of the Methodist
Episcopal Church, discussions were held on how the denomination might
effectively raise additional funding for missions, as well as recognize
both the centennial of black Methodist missionary John Stewart and the
1819 founding of the Missionary Society of the Methodist Episcopal
Church. Minutes from the General Conference state, "Whereas, the
Missionary Society of the Methodist Episcopal Church was born in 1819,
and, during one hundred years of splendid service, has helped to spread
Christ's kingdom not only at home but in many foreign fields,
Therefore, be it resolved, that the General Conference authorizes the
setting aside of the years 1918 and 1919 as Centennial Thanksgiving
years ... and to make all necessary arrangements to enable the Church to
signalize the Centennial year by special intercession and the outpouring
of gifts." (13)
During the General Conference the Board of Foreign Missions was
directed to organize a Centenary Commission to make "Centenary
Surveys" of all missionaries, foreign fields, and needed funding.
The results of the survey were presented in 1917 at Niagara Falls, New
York, to the World Program Committee, a select group of Methodists whose
task it was to organize the exposition. The recommendation highlighted
the origin of the exposition and the ultimate motives of the Centenary
Commission: "The Centenary Program should culminate in a great
Centenary Celebration to be held in Columbus, Ohio in June, 1919. In
this Celebration the Methodist Church, South will join with the Board of
Home Missions and Church Extension, and the Board of Foreign Missions of
the Methodist Episcopal Church." Furthermore, "The Centenary
Commission should keep constantly in mind, as its goal, the making of
every church in Methodism dominantly missionary. By this we mean: a
church with a missionary passion which will be evangelistic at home and
truly missionary in its out-reaching to the ends of the earth; a church
in which each member recognizes it as his sacred obligation to promote
the world-wide plans of Jesus Christ." (14)
For American Methodists the "world-wide plans of Jesus
Christ" meant the evangelization and Christian conversion of the
world, and the upcoming missionary exposition--which some observers
called a Methodist world's fair (15)--would become a vehicle for
carrying out these plans. The leadership of the Methodist Church
believed it was on the frontlines of this global endeavor, but to
accomplish this task a large amount of money was needed. The Niagara
Falls commission recommended that the Church raise $8 million a year for
five years to cover the expenses of Methodist missionary activities at
home and abroad. (16) Once raised, the money would go toward projects in
the United States and overseas, including the building of hospitals and
schools, as well as the salaries of missionaries.
The amount of money pledged to the Methodist Episcopal Church from
1917 to 1919 far exceeded the $40 million originally proposed by the
Centenary Commission. Fund drive pledge cards filled out before the
start of the June 1919 exposition committed Methodists to give almost
$160 million toward global missions--an enormous sum of money to be
promised by any group or organization in the early twentieth century.
Methodist leaders investigated a number of Mid-western cities,
including Indianapolis, Indiana; Cincinnati, Ohio; and Louisville,
Kentucky, before settling on Columbus. Honoring the
"discoverer" of America, the city's name sounded an
appropriate note. Many Americans associated the term
"Columbus" with "progress" and
"conquest"--two important words used by proponents of
Methodist missions at the Columbus exposition--and the name carried
expansionist overtones linked to the westward progress of the United
States in the nineteenth century. (17)
Both denominational demographics and accessibility entered into
selection of the city. A survey had indicated that one in twelve Ohio
residents attended a Methodist Episcopal Church and that approximately
one million Methodists lived within a six-hour drive of the city. (18)
Columbus served as a central hub for the U.S. railroad system, and a
number of highways intersected with the city, connecting it with
surrounding states. To assist Methodists toward finding their way to the
Centenary Celebration organizers distributed 100,000 free road maps with
directions to the fairgrounds to churches and individuals across the
United States.
Significance and Outcome
The Centenary Celebration, along with other missionary expositions,
was more than simply a venue for missionary promotion. As a fair, even
if a missionary one, it stood in a lengthy line of self-congratulatory
international expositions. Technological achievements, such as its
gargantuan movie screen, earn it a minor note in the history of the
growth of the U.S. entertainment industry. As a set of exhibits arranged
for public viewing, the Centenary Celebration has a place within the
wider field of museology, the discipline having to do with artifact
selection, preservation, organization, and exhibition.
Recent theoretical scholarship in museology addresses the
motivations that lie behind the exhibition--and viewing---of people and
the placement of products on display. Tony Bennett writes of the
"exhibitionary complex" that moves people and objects from
previously enclosed or private locations to more open and interactive
settings. Viewers are provided with opportunities to compare and
contrast themselves with the persons and objects on display. Bennett
raises questions about the impact the curator's control of the
exhibit's arrangement has on the way people and objects are
understood and interpreted. (19)
Barbara Kirshenblatt-Gimblett highlights the issue of placing of
peoples and material objects in curator-defined contexts for purposes of
display. On the one hand, ethnographic villages, "natives,"
and selected objects on display become representative of an entire
country or particular group of people. On the other hand, the
paraphernalia of exhibits, including descriptive diagrams, charts, or
identification tags, distance viewers from the objects under
observation. While onlookers are able to make comparisons, the supplied
frames of reference privilege the viewer over against the objects or
"natives" on display. (20)
Considered in light of the work of Bennett and
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, what did people attending the Centenary
Celebration see? By viewing the people of the world "live,"
American Methodists could compare their own privileged situation, their
Western cultural advantages, and their faith in Christ with those in the
exhibit. For these same viewers, the foreigners on display gave evidence
of many disadvantages and needs.
From the perspective of the organizers of the Centenary
Celebration, the various pavilions provided a visual and auditory
representation of the impact Methodist missionaries were having on
particular countries and peoples. The exhibits provided an interactive
map of Methodist missionary work throughout the world. Unfortunately, as
the climax of a fund-raising campaign, the missionary fair was less
successful. Though the promotion and excitement of the Centenary
Celebration created an initial fervor to spread Christianity, the
excitement was short-lived and the amount of money collected fell far
short of the amount pledged. Money received was used in a variety of
ways, including funding for academic institutions, hospitals, and
churches throughout the world. Funds actually received were insufficient
to complete these building projects, leading some church leaders to
charge that Methodists were robbing God. (21)
The missionary exposition of 1919 was never to be repeated. To the
best of my knowledge neither the Methodist Church nor any other
Wesleyan-affiliated tradition ever held another fair of such magnitude
and scope. Mission festivals held at churches and conferences today
serve as small-scale reminders of the missionary fairs staged between
1867 and 1919.
Setting aside the financial difficulties that followed it, during
the Centennial Celebration American Methodists from 1916 to 1919 had
imagined the conversion of the world for Christ with a sense of
expectation. They had also enjoyed themselves at a religious festival
that combined leisurely entertainment with promotion of Methodist
missions and global Christian advance. The exposition was missionary in
nature with serious intercultural implications. The peoples, homes, and
material objects of mission lands beckoned the gaze, the interest, and
the money of visitors. Made aware of needs around the world, the crowds
departed from the exposition better informed concerning the work that
needed to be done on behalf of distant peoples in need of Christian
salvation and Methodist deliverance.
Notes
(1.) For discussion of the setting and outcome of the Centenary
Celebration of American Methodist Missions, see Christopher J. Anderson,
"The World Is Our Parish: Displaying Home and Foreign Missions at
the 1919 Methodist World's Fair" (Ph.D. diss., Drew
University, 2006).
(2.) "Centenary Celebration Columbus," Columbus Evening
Dispatch, July 4, 1919, p. 15.
(3.) "The Outer World," Epworth Herald, May 24, 1919, p.
487.
(4.) "Replica of Philippine Village Marvel of Ingenuity,"
Columbus Evening Dispatch, June 23, 1919, p. 6.
(5.) Fred Smith, "In Stride with the Christian World: An
Exposition de Luxe," Association Men, August 1919, p. 876.
(6.) Ibid.
(7.) "World to See Centenary Celebration," Central
Christian Advocate, July 2, 1919, p. 8.
(8.) [Harrie R. Chamberlin, ed.], Handbook and Guide of the World
in Boston: The First Great Exposition in America of Home and Foreign
Missions ([Boston]: World in Boston, [1911]), pp. 107-8. In 1911 the
name of the YPMM was changed to Missionary Education Movement; it
continues today as the Mission Education Movement.
(9.) Ibid., p. 105.
(10.) Methodist Episcopal Church leadership and others connected
with the 1919 Columbus exposition served in various roles at the 1911
Boston fair. S. Earl Taylor, Methodist Board of Foreign Missions
secretary and general secretary of the Centenary Celebration, served as
consulting secretary for the Boston event. Methodist minister Ralph E.
Diffendorfer organized the children's section at "The World in
Boston" and later became general secretary of the Methodist
Episcopal Church, serving as a speaker for the home missions exhibits at
the Columbus fair. Professor Lamont A. Warner of Columbia University
designed many of the exhibits at Boston and later served as director of
fine arts for the Columbus exposition.
(11.) Handbook and Guide of the World in Boston, pp. 4-5. These
pages contain a detailed floor plan of the various exhibits in the
Mechanics Building.
(12.) S. Earl Taylor and James W. Bashford, "The Timeliness of
the Centenary," in The Centenary Survey of the Board of Foreign
Missions: The Methodist Episcopal Church (New York: Joint Centenary
Committee of the Methodist Episcopal Church, 1918), pp. 7-8.
(13.) Ibid., p. 5.
(14.) Ibid.
(15.) "The Methodist 'World's Fair,'"
Central Christian Advocate, July 26, 1919, p. 12.
(16.) John Lankford, "Methodism 'Over the Top': The
Joint Centenary Movement, 1917-1925," Methodist History 2, no. 1
(October 1963): 27.
(17.) See Thomas J. Schlereth, "Columbia, Columbus, and
Columbianism," Journal of American History 79, no. 3 (December
1992): 946. By the early twentieth century some U.S. states officially
recognized Columbus Day. For the danger of descent into boosterism, see
a local reporter's comments: "It is altogether fitting that
the word 'Columbus' is attached to this exposition, because it
is in Columbus, Ohio, that things are shown which mark the great
progress of the world since the days when Columbus discovered this
wonderful country--the one country in all the world that is able to do
and is glad to do more for all of the other countries of the world than
any other single nation." "Centenary Celebration
Columbus," Columbus Evening Dispatch, June 28, 1919, p. 7.
(18.) "Official Reports and Records of the Methodist Centenary
Celebration. State Fair Grounds, Columbus, Ohio, June 20-July 13,
1919," compiled by Alonzo E. Wilson, director, Division of Special
Days and Events, p. 12. This volume is located at the General Commission
on Archives and History for the United Methodist Church, Madison, New
Jersey. See also Nancye Van Brunt, "Pageantry at the Methodist
Centenary," Methodist History 35, no. 2 (January 1997): 106.
(19.) Tony Bennett, The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory,
Politics (New York: Routledge, 1995), pp. 60-62.
(20.) Barbara Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, "Objects of
Ethnography," in Exhibiting Cultures: The Poetics and Politics of
Museum Display, ed. Ivan Karp and Steven D. Lavine (Washington, D.C.:
Smithsonian Institution Press, 1991), pp. 388-90.
(21.) The Methodist Year Book (New York: Methodist Book Concern,
1921), pp. 154-55. Elmer T. Clark, The Uttermost Parts: The Situation,
the Challenge, the Opportunity, the Duty of Methodist Missions
(Nashville: Board of Missions, Methodist Episcopal Church, South, 1926),
pp. 13-15. See also Elmer T. Clark, The Task Ahead: The Missionary
Crisis of the Church (Nashville: Board of Missions, Centenary
Commission, Methodist Episcopal Church, South, 1925), p. 255.
Christopher J. Anderson is Lecturer in History and Religion at
Fairleigh Dickinson University, Madison, New Jersey, and Union
Theological Seminary, New York City.