The pre-Raphaelites.
Boos, Florence S.
The past year has brought us The Correspondence of Dante Gabriel
Rossetti, The Chelsea Years, 1863.1872, III. 1871-72, the fifth volume
of a series originally to be prepared by the late William Fredeman, and
completed after his death in 1999 by a consortium of editors listed as
Roger C. Lewis, Jane Cowan, Roger W. Peattie, Allan Life, and Page Life.
Fredeman's hand may be seen in the work's voluminous
appendices, bibliography, and "Biographical and Analytical
Index" (pp. 379-676), and one of the nine appendices reproduces his
Prelude to the Last Decade: Dante Gabriel Rossetti in the Summer of 1872
(1971), a reconstruction of the period of Rossetti's mental
breakdown that Fredeman based on his research in the Penkill and Angeli
papers.
The work's "Biographical and Analytical Index," in
particular, recapitulates prior entries in the indexes to the first five
volumes (1835-72), and Fredeman (presumably) explained his rationale for
such care as follows: "Among the many deficiencies of the
Doughty-Wahl edition of Rossetti's letters, perhaps the most
serious--certainly the most inconvenient--was the absence of an index.
While some users may feel that this editor has erred in the opposite
direction, the ultimate test will be in the reliability and usefulness
of the index to scholars, students, and readers who consult it" (p.
487).
One reason why many may in fact wish to consult this index is that
it offers a summary of the contents of all letters published in the
edition to date, under a number of rubrics (names, artworks, and
publications among them). Rossetti's relations with William Morris,
for example, take up four columns, with Ford Madox Brown more than
eight, and with Charles Augustus Howell about seven. Other appendices
offer editorial views (presumably Fredeman's) of the antecedents of
Elizabeth Siddal's suicide, as well as Rossetti's experiments
with spiritualism and his conjectures about immortality (according to
William Michael Rossetti, "he credited neither immediate bliss
after death nor irrevocable 'damnation,' but rather a period
of purgation and atonement, with gradual ascent, comparable more or less
to the purgatory of Roman Catholics" [p. 4031).
As in earlier volumes, the letters in this one reveal a
self-absorbed but often generous man at his best and worst: capable of
genuine eloquence in notes to families of deceased artists and affection
for close friends such as Ford Madox Brown and Thomas Hake; and of
ill-temper in negotiations with much-tried patrons and overbearing
demands on his long-suffering employees and friends.
Readers aware of the pain Rossetti's affair with Jane Morris
caused her husband will also find evasive several of his letters from
Kelmscott Manor in the summer and early fall of 1871, in which he
blandly alluded to family readings of Shakespeare and made polite
references to Morris' journey to Iceland, but pointedly ignored the
reasons for his stoic friend's absence. Rossetti expressed urbane
boredom with the nearby village ("only 117 inhabitants in
Kelmscott, a hoary sleepy old lump of beehives as ever you saw"
[September 4; p. 135]), but graciously acknowledged that "I have
been here some days now & it is simply the loveliest place in the
world--I mean the house and garden & immediate belongings"
(July 16; p. 71), and for a time seriously considered the possibility of
permanent settlement there. In an 1872 letter to Aglaia Coronio, Morris
glossed such plans and other aspects of the situation as follows:
"Rossetti has set himself down at Kelmscott as if he never meant to
go away; and not only does that keep me away from that harbour of
refuge, (because it is really a farce our meeting when we can help it)
but also he has all sorts of ways so unsympathetic with the sweet simple
old place, that I feel his presence there as a kind of a slur on
it" (November 25, 1872; Letters, ed. Kelvin, 1:12).
Rossetti's 1871 letters also commented at length on his own
and others' poetry, set forth blunt criticisms and suggestions for
the work of friends and acquaintances such as Hake, John Payne, and W.
B. Scott, and expressed satisfaction that his eyesight had improved and
his earning power had not waned. He was creatively active as well,
drafting "Sunset Wings," "Cloud Confines,"
"Down Stream," "The Chimes," "Soothsay,"
and "Rose Mary," as well as twenty-seven sonnets for "The
House of Life," and the only signs of (understandable) agitation
appeared in his responses to Robert Buchanan's now-famous assault
on "The Fleshly School of Poetry," which appeared under the
pseudonym of Thomas Maitland in the October 1871 Contemporary Review.
Initially, at least, Rossetti tried to brush off Buchanan's
"abuse [which] comes in a form that even a bard can ... grin at
without grimacing" (to F. S. Ellis; October 8, 1871), but he wrote
other letters of inquiry and outrage in which he attempted to marshall
critics and supporters in his defense and prepared (against the advice
of several of his friends) the counterattack which appeared as "The
Stealthy School of Criticism" in the Athenaeum for December 1871.
The letters preserved from January through May showed little or no
forewarning of Rossetti's June 2nd attempted suicide, however--so
little, in fact, as to give rise to suspicions that many may have been
destroyed. On May 28, Rossetti wrote his purchaser James Leathart about
a sale, and on June 4 put off a proposed visit from another client
George Rae with an explanation that he was "a good deal
engaged." He wrote Robert Browning on June 5 to thank him warmly
for a copy of Fifine at the Fair (a work he later interpreted as a
hostile attack), and wrote his mother on June 21 to assure her he had
arrived safely at Urrard House in Perthshire, the rural location chosen
for his convalescence. Most of the extant letters from the next two
months--to William Michael Rossetti, Ford Madox Brown, Charles Augustus
Howell, and Thomas Gordon Hake (whose son George worked as his
attendant)--focused on money-raising and provision for Fanny Cornforth,
or expressed gratitude for his friends' and brother's kindness
and concern.
As he recovered from his breakdown, Rossetti moved to a house in
Trowan near Perth in September and resumed more normal modes of
correspondence from there, writing F. S. Ellis to recommend publication
of a novel by his friend Hake, to Fanny to alert her to delays in his
return to London, and to Brown to describe the new paintings he hoped to
undertake. In Kelmscott by late September, he gradually returned to his
painting and intricate financial maneuvers, and wrote with a certain
bravado to Howell on September 30 that "the pictures I shall be
painting now will be a great advance on my best hitherto, as the last
thing or two I have done prove conclusively."
As this brief summary suggests, few scholarly revelations emerge
from the most recent volume of Rossetti's collected letters, but
the continuing project remains an invaluable source of insight for
critics and historians into the complicated interpenetration of
Rossetti's creative gifts, unquestioned accomplishments, and
precarious mental equilibrium.
In his introduction to Haunted Texts: Studies in Pre-Raphaelitism
in Honour of William E. Fredeman (2003), a retrospective of the revival
of Rossetti scholarship initiated by Fredeman's Pre-Raphaelitism: A
Bibliocritical Study (1965), David Latham outlines briefly something of
Fredeman's unusual life-course, from his origins as a ward of state
in a public orphanage in Arkansas, to his preparation of the
dissertation which became A Bibliocritical Study and subsequent career
as an academic and patron of younger students of Pre-Raphaelitism at the
University of British Columbia.
Latham also reviews the historical and semantic evolution of the
term "Pre-Raphaelitism," and observes correctly that much of
the notion's appeal has derived from its interdisciplinary
diffusion. Citing Morris' definition of romance as "the
capacity for a true conception of history, a power of making the past
part of the present" (p. 5), he further argues that Pre-Raphaelite
texts are "haunted" by their programmatic intention to view
"the present through prefigurations from the past and the eternal
through the concrete details of mythology" (p. 3), and comments on
Pre-Raphaelite preoccupation with preternatually "natural"
detail in moments of crisis and uses of "the decorative" to
"eternalize the mundane" (p. 15). Appropriately, given the
generative diffusion of the term, Latham concludes that "truth for
the Pre-Raphaelite is the variety of possibities suspended among
different readings" (p. 19). His article offers an excellent
starting point for study of Pre-Raphaelitism's historical and
interpretive ramifications, as well as a thoughful guide to recent
criticism.
In his article "A Commentary on Some of Rossetti's
Translations from Dante," Jerome McGann interprets Rossetti's
dicta in The Early Italian Poets (1861) that "a good poem shall not
be turned into a bad one," that "faithful" but not
"literal" translations are desirable, and that translators
should seek metrical (not semantic) equivalents in the prosody of the
target-language as partial anticipations of twentieth-century
translation theory.
In support of Rossetti's view, McGann also offers careful
readings of the seventeen poems of "Vita Nuova," construes
Rossetti's uses of "a multiplicity of short words and
ground[ing of] the rhythm in words of one syllable" as a
sophisticated effort to echo the rhythms of the work's Italian
original, and concludes his tribute with a kind of secular-chiliastic
assertion that "Rossetti's poetry as everyone knows, is
replete with haunted texts, where the present world is regularly
impinged upon by forces from the past and spirits of the dead.
Rossetti's translation of the Vita Nuova is exactly that kind of
text--less a translation, in the ordinary sense, than a raising from the
dead through a secular reinvention of a key Christian economy,
prefiguration. The New Life of Dante's autobiography, in his view
of the matter, is that one far-off sublime event to which its whole
creation, unbenownst to itself, moved" (p. 49).
In "Rossetti's Elegy for Masculine Desire: Seduction and
Loss in the 'House of Life,'" E. Warwick Slinn analyzes
the progression of the poem's images, from a stage in which the
male speaker seduces a woman by "appropriating her qualities in
order to define and qualify his own" (p. 55), to a recognition of
his own predicament in which "poetic identity is tied to the
present absence of a female other and where loss, if not inherent, is
certainly endemic" (p. 57) and "love" "becomes ...
merely an abstract noun, a signifier without a referent" (p. 65).
Observing that the emptiness of this formula would be "no surprise
to contemporary feminine psychoanalysis," Slinn concludes that
"courtly love structures could not provide suitable roles for
female poets without considerable modification, as both Elizabeth
Barrett Browning in "Sonnets from the Portuguese and Christina
Rossetti in 'Monna Innominata' demonstrate; but The House of
Life shows that these structures also fail to sustain male identity and
idealism" (p. 6).
In "The Great Pre-Raphaelite Paper Chase: A
Retropective," a talk read in 1994, five years before his death,
William Fredeman reviewed his career as a collector and editor as well
as the changing fortunes of Pre-Raphaelitism, a topic considered so
insignificant in his youth that his dissertation committee was reluctant
to let him pursue it. Recalling with zest yesteryear's low prices
for Pre-Raphaelite artifacts (and regretting the bargains and finds
which escaped him), Fredeman also remembered with special fondness his
discovery of the Penkill papers in an attic trunk unopened since Alice
Boyd's death in 1897 (cf. the mansard-discovery of
"dolly's-secret" in A. S. Byatt's Possession), as
well as his close personal ties with Rossetti's niece Helen
Rossetti Angeli, who offered him (and through him, us) not only the
Angeli-Dennis collection, but a bountiful store of personal information
about the Rossetti family as well.
With characteristic asperity and tenacity, finally, Fredeman
reviewed and enumerated for his 1994 audience the delays, quarrels, and
inaccuracies of the Doughty-Wahl edition which his own edition of
Rossetti's letters was designed to supplant, and his narrative
conveys twelve years later the passion and single-mindedness which made
him one of Victorian literary criticism's foremost archival
scholars.
In "William Michael Rossetti and the Making of Christina
Rossetti's Reputation," Roger Peattie draws together the
impressive evidence of William Michael's consistent and
indefatigable efforts to aid his sister's career and reputation, in
response to other critics' claims that William Michael hindered or
exploited his sister's work. Not only did William support her
financially between 1854 and 1876, for example, but he also spent much
of the last twenty years of his life editing and arranging for
posthumous publication of her letters and verse, including many poems
not published in her lifetime. He rejected her religious faith but
appreciated her gifts, and wrote to his daughter Olivia in 1898 that
Christina was "truly a very great poet; & one cannot read a
dozen lines of her without coming upon something which rings true to all
time" (p. 89).
William Michael Rossetti-the self-effacing lifelong chronicler of
his siblings and associates-has also (and at long last) become a subject
in his own right, in Angela Thirlwell's William and Lucy: The Other
Rossettis (Yale Univ. Press, 2003)--an account which lends strong
support to William Fredeman's assertion that William "was
almost the only man of action [in the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood], and
without him there would have been no Brotherhood, no Germ, no PRB Journal, and no movement to leave its mark on the history of English
art."
Thirlwell's work also rescues from ancillary obscurity
William's gifted and mercurial wife Lucy Brown Rossetti, a feminist
biographer who shared her husband's progressive views, and raised
four independent and artistically inclined children before she succumbed
to tuberculosis in (what would now be) early middle age. Lucy Rossetti
was also an accomplished portraitist, who rendered Mathilde Blind, Andre
(the son of the family's French cook) and others in chalk, and
painted oil and watercolor tableaux of "Romeo and Juliet in the
Tomb," "Ferdinand and Miranda Playing Chess," "The
Fair Geraldine or the Magic Mirror," and (a particularly
interesting subject, I think) "Margaret Roper Rescuing the Head of
Her Father."
By way of diversion, Thirlwell also offers readers dozens of
reproductions of hitherto little-known artworks and photographs:
paintings by Ford Madox Brown; a lavishly illustrated (dual) family
tree; William and Lucy's wedding photograph; and (a surprise, at
least to me) drawings by William of his mother, his sister Christina,
and John Everett Millais. The quality of these drawings suggests that he
might have enjoyed a modest artistic career, had he not assumed the
heavy obligation to pay the family's bills.
At a deeper level, finally--drawing on diaries, private
correspondence, and contemporary reminiscences and arranging her
exposition in diachronic sections ("Scenes from Family Life,"
"The Victorian," "Pre-Raphaelite,"
"Artist," "Man of Letters," "Marriage,"
"Radicals," "The Patient," and
"Coda")--Thirlwell has provided readers with an almost
Chekhovian account of the passionate bonds which united "William
and Lucy," as well as the mingled idealism and insecurity of Lucy
Rossetti's temperament in her last valetudinarian decade. William
and Lucy's absorbing account of a "sexually frank, avowedly
agnostic, politically radical and committedly feminist" (as well as
artistic, literary, and cosmopolitan) couple corrects as well as
supplements our understanding of lives and accomplishments of the
"movement"'s "brothers," wives, and sisters.
In "To the Rossettis, from the Solomons. Five Unpublished
Letters" (N & Q, March 2005), Roberto C. Ferrari reproduces and
comments on five letters from the artists Simeon and Rebecca Solomon, in
evidence for his assertion that the Solomons and Rossettis were more
closely acquainted than biographers have assumed. William Rossetti wrote
two favorable reviews of Solomon's artwork in 1858, and in 1864
Solomon offered to join WMR on a trip to Paris. In other letters, Simeon
also praised William Michael's Whitman edition and apologized to
Dante for his failure to return an artistic prop. Rebecca Solomon wrote
to Dante Rossetti to seek his advice on one of her paintings, remark on
her impoverished state, and (sadly) implore him to hire her as an
assistant. Simeon Solomon was later shunned after an arrest for indecent
exposure and attempted "buggery" in 1873; Rebecca died in a
hansome cab accident in 1886; and Simeon, by then an alcoholic, died in
poverty in 1905.
In "Dante Gabriel Rossetti and the Burdens of Nineveh,"
(VLC 33, no. 2), Andrew M. Stauffer develops a number of historical and
interpretive insights into the revisions and antecedents of
Rossetti's "Burden of Nineveh." Tracing Romantic
representations of Egyptian and Assyrian artifacts as a sign of the
decay of past imperial empires, Stauffer finds precedents for
Rossetti's interpretation of the bull as a prophecy of potential
British decay in an unusual range of sources: Byron's Sardanapalus
(1821), for example, illustrations and poetry in Punch (1850), Alfred
William Hunt's 1851 poem "Nineveh," and a story in
Dickens' Household Words (titled "The Nineveh Bull,"
1851).
Most important, of course, was Austen Henry Layard's Nineveh
and Its Remains (1849), whose illustrations invited symbolic parallels
between the Assyrian king's employment of bands of slaves to drag
the immense bull to its original station and Layard's employment of
Arab laborers to haul the bull to a British ship. In his conclusion,
Stauffer construes Rossetti's poem as an instance of Ricoeurian
"appropriation"--the use of past artifacts to generate new
forms of present self-awareness--and wryly compares the poem's
allusions to the mummy's uncovering with Rossetti's exhumation
of his poetic manuscript from his wife's tomb.
Christina Rossetti's work has been reexamined in four articles
which appeared this year. In "A Chink in the Armour: Christina
Rossetti's 'The Prince's Progress,' 'A Royal
Princess,' and Victorian Medievalism" (Women's Writing
12, no. 1), Noelle Bowles argues that the two cited poems critiqued
Victorian romanticizations of the medieval world, and "more than
any of her other works, revise[d] and subvert[ed] the cultural framework
of Victorian neo-feudalism and its authoritarian, patriarchal
philosophy" (p. 116).
The desultory and unmotivated hero of "The Prince's
Progress," for example, fails to complete his quest and redeem his
intended princess, in a portrayal which effectively sends up Victorian
depictions of chivalry and suggests that "the man real women wait
for may not be worth the suffering and self-abnegation" (p. 119).
Similarly, Rossetti's "Royal Princess"--who comes to
understand the oppressions which have goaded her father's subjects
to rebel, and offers her jewels to the needy--enjoins us to do likewise.
Unfortunately, however, "we do not witness [the princess']
confrontation with the crowd or her reception by the masses.... [for to]
enact the envisioned solidarity of women and workers was perhaps too
radical a step for Rossetti to take" (p. 121), and Bowles concludes
that "if readers are enchanted by the glamour of medievalism and
blindly accept its socio-political tenets, Christina Rossetti suggests
they will be happy never after" (p. 124).
In "Christina Rossetti's Poetic Vocation"
(Women's Writing 12, no. 2), Sarah Fiona Winters takes issue with
Gilbert and Gubar's interpretation of Maud as an allegorical
conflict between literary ambition and religious renunciation, and
argues that Rossetti pursued her vocation as a means of serving God
through her public voice. Setting aside obvious tensions between secular
and religious desires evident in Rossetti's early poetry, Winters
contrasts her motivations with Gerard Manley Hopkins' ambivalent
responses to "fame" and publication, and concludes that
"Rossetti actively sought to publish her poetry because she was
able to reconcile her identities as a woman and as a poet by subsuming
both under her identity as a Christian" (p. 299).
In "The Edge of Sisterhood in Christina Rossetti's
'The Convent Threshold'" (JPRS 14, Fall), Scott Rogers
suggests that the poem's protagonist may be a "fallen
woman" about to enter a house of "reclamation," and
argues that "convents were closely involved in efforts to reclaim
fallen women, and this association complicates the assumption that
crossing the convent threshold only entails becoming a nun, since there
were many similarities between a fallen woman entering a house of
reclamation and a nun entering the cloister" (p. 31). Finding the
poem's absence of any portrayal of life within the convent "a
sanitizing of the relationship between the fallen woman and the
institution of reclamation" (p. 34), he concludes that Rossetti had
had little or no direct contact with such institutions when she composed
"The Convent Threshold" (July 9, 1858), but began "to
examine more fully what lies beyond the convent threshold ... as her own
knowledge of the inner workings of those communities [became] more
complete while volunteering at Highgate Penitentiary" (p. 41).
In "'Eat Me, Drink Me, Love Me': Eucharist and the
Erotic Body in Christina Rossetti's Goblin Market" (VP 43, no.
4), Marylu Hill interprets the scene in which Laura sucks goblin juices
from her sister Lizzie as a "regenerative meal" and "body
offered as sacrifice and then as food--which is precisely how the
Eucharist is defined throughout Church history" (p. 462). Noting
that E. B. Pusey's 1855 Doctrine of the Real Presence interpreted
the eucharist as an "antidote" for the apple of sin which must
be imbibed through a "real, actual, though Sacramental and
spiritual drinking" (p. 466), Hill argues that "Rossetti
forces our concept of the erotic body to an entirely new limit" (p.
465), and concludes that "Rossetti offers a masterful illustration
of how the forces of the erotic and the spiritual might be yoked
together to reveal the body as something desirable yet also the very
stuff of sacrifice and redemption" (p. 470).
The year's most extensive collection of articles devoted to
William Morris is a commemorative double issue of the Journal of William
Morris Studies edited by Rosie Miles. In her opening essay,
"Morris's Ethics, Cosmopolitanism and Globalisation,"
Regenia Gagnier assesses Morris' achievements and socialist
convictions in the context of late-nineteenth-century preoccupations
with perennial tensions between "individual freedoms and social
provisions," and explores some of the implications of Morris'
stubborn refusal to distinguish "the Fine" from "the
Good," as well as his denial that genuine individuality can
flourish in the absence of equality and social justice. Observing
correctly that Morris was a "great writer of pilgrims, travellers
and refugees" (pp. 19-20), and that an ethic of "hospitality:
the treatment of the Guest or the Other" (p. 12) was deeply
important to him, Gagnier also assimilates his protagonists'
loneliness, cultural internationalism, and willingness to overcome
hostility to the virtues of an idealized "kosmopolites," or
world-citizen. In her conclusion, she suggests that "his
hospitality toward guests and others," as well as "his
disenchantment and ... critical engagement with his own age" and
often-dismissed and sometimes-maligned medievalism ('the past is
another country') "keep ... before our minds images of freedom
... and ... justice for pilgrims, guests and refugees of time and space
... like and not like our own" (p. 24).
In "Rediscovering the Topography of Wonder: Morris, Iceland
and the Late Romances," Phillippa Bennett construes Morris'
response to the remote beauty of Iceland as a not "wholly
intelligible" reaction which profoundly affected his later life.
Observing that "other visitors gazed at, rode through, took samples
from, sketched and wrote about Iceland, ... [but] Morris wondered at
it" (p. 35), Bennett mines the aesthetic vocabulary of Kantian and
Ruskinian notions of wonder and sublimity for insights into Morris'
diaries of the period, typified by his passing remark that "there
was something eminently touching about the valley [of Halldorsstapir]
and its nearness to the waste that gave me that momentary insight into
what the whole thing means that blesses us sometimes and is gone
again" (p. 36), and concludes that the "topography of
wonder" of vast mountain barriers, in particular, generated in him
a "movement from momentary paralysis to vital action.... Morris
recognised that a profound experience of wonder raised those energies
and faculties even--and perhaps most particularly--when such personal
security could not be guaranteed" (p. 40).
In "Kinetic Utopias: H. G. Wells's A Modern Utopia and
William Morris's News from Nowhere," Tony Pinkney responds to
H. G. Wells's indictment of News from Nowhere as a sentimental and
"unmodern" text with the argument that News from Nowhere
contains "principles of change and transformation within
itself," and presents "two utopias bound within the same set
of book covers" (p. 50), one in which Guest learns the principles
of a new society from its inhabitants, and another in which he finds the
spiritual meaning of Nowhere in the vital but complex and elusive figure
of Ellen, who "asks us [in effect] to reassess ... its idyllic
London scenes, ... [and envision a] more energetic, fully historicised
and political world" (p. 54).
In "The Story of Alcestis in William Morris and Ted
Hughes," Peter Faulkner contrasts Ted Hughes's Alcestis
(1999), which ends with Heracles' allegorical redemption of
Alcestis from death and a choral injunction to "[1]et this give man
hope," with Morris' "Story of Alcestis" in The
Earthly Paradise, based on Apollodorus, in which Alcestis'
sacrificial death brings her immortal fame. Observing that
Alcestis' redemption in Morris' redaction was the immortality
of remembrance, Faulkner correctly finds "no role in Morris'
world, now or later, for a Heracles who can overcome the power of
Death" (p. 77).
In "The Music of the Mind: Structure and Substance in William
Morris's The Water of the Wondrous Isles," George D. Gopen
argues that Morris' romance shares a theme-, variation-, and
return-structure common to musical forms such as the minuet and trio,
and interprets Birdalone's voyages and encounters as stages in a
development which concludes "when she returns eventually to each of
the islands, [and] we recall the home-ness of the island that was
established the first time around and are impressed by how she now
'knows it for the first time'" (p. 96). Gopen's
interpretations clarify certain idiosyncracies of the romance's
plot, and support his conclusion that "Morris ... combined the
psychological force of the fairy tale with the inundative detail of the
full extension of a novel to present the ... maturation process of a
young woman striving to find her way in a predominately male world"
(p. 101).
In "William Morris's 'Our Country Right or
Wrong': A Critical Edition" and a companion-piece
("Dystopian Violence: William Morris and the Nineteenth-Century
Peace Movement," JPRS 14, Spring), I reproduced a hitherto partly
unpublished anti-war essay Morris wrote in the period of his work for
the Eastern Question Association, and interpreted the essay as a whole
as a more than usually prescient critique of reasons of state and the
elusive notion of a "just" war.
In it, for example, Morris imagined the effects of war in central
London, denounced imperial interventions in Africa, Afghanistan, and the
Balkans, and reminded his auditors that appeals to patriotism provide
convenient pretexts for domestic repression. In anticipation of his
later political views, he also contrasted such pretexts with a
counterfactual social order in which
every man's work would be pleasant to himself and helpful to his
neighbor [,] ... his leisure from bread-earning work ... would be
thoughtful and rational: ... [S]uch a man as this ... would never
fail in self-respect [, and ...] you may be sure he would take good
care to have his due share in the government of his country and
would know all about its dealings with other countries: justice to
himself & all others would be no mere name to him, but the rule of
all his actions, the passionate desire of his life. (p. 56)
Prompted by such passages, I construed in "Dystopian
Violence" Morris' unpublished critiques of "National
Vain-glory" as anticipations of his subsequent critiques of
capitalism, as well as natural consequents of the reflections of Quaker
pacifists such as William Dymond and the activities of then-pioneering
but now-forgotten working-class anti-war groups such as the
Workman's Peace Association, the Workmen's Neutrality
Committee, and the Labour Representation League, and analogues and
variants of views of mutualist anarchists and communists such as
Proudhon and Kropotkin.
More speculatively, I also suggested that Morris gradually edged
closer to outright pacifism as he gained in wariness and political
sophistication. Consider, for example, one of his last public utterances
on the subject: "The doing of it [making the workers conscious of
the need for change] speedily and widely is the real safeguard against
acts of violence, which even when done by fanatics and not by
self-seekers are still acts of violence, and therefore degrading to
humanity, as all war is" (Morris' italics, Hammersmith
Socialist Record, 1892).
In "Where Medieval Romance Meets Victorian Reality: The
'Woman Question' in William Morris' The Wood Beyond the
World" (in Lorreta M. Holloway and Jennifer A. Palmgren, Beyond
Arthurian Romances: The Reach of Victorian Medievalism, Palgrave), Lori
Campbell argues that Morris' portrayals of egalitarian
relationships in News from Nowhere (1890), The Glittering Plain (1890),
and The Water of the Wondrous Isles (1896) evolved "as a line of
inquiry, with each new story revealing new turns in his thinking"
(p. 179). She interprets the period in which Waiter's fate is
determined in the "wood" by the actions of the
"Mistress" and the "Maid" as an example of
role-reversal, and construes the "Maid"'s ultimate
abjuration of magical powers for conventional wifely roles as an
implicit suggestion by Morris "that a system founded on a lack of
equality for all, regardless of sex, offers no hope for any real social
or political progress" (p. 188).
In "'The Worship of Courage': William Morris's
Sigurd the Volsung and Victorian Medievalism" (Holloway and
Palmgren), finally, Richard Frith distinguishes "Pre-Raphaelite or
Aesthetic medievalism," which prized subversively erotic elements
of medieval art, from 'Ruskinian medievalism,' which idealized
the social order of the Middle Ages, and he interprets "Sigurd the
Volsung," drafted after Morris' return from Iceland, as a
"combination of ... tragic love story with ... qualities of
reticence and stoicism" (p. 120) embedded in cycles of nature.
Acknowledging that Morris made the figure of Sigurd "more
altruistic and less revenge-driven than his saga counterpart" (p.
125), Frith argues that Morris' historicism nevertheless prompted
him "simultaneously to universalize the tale and to retain its
cultural specificity" (p. 127) rather than assimilate it to
Victorian ideals of the sort embodied in Tennyson's Idylls, and
that this decision made Sigurd the Volsung "in a real sense the
central work of Morris's life .... poised on the cusp of [his]
political involvements," where "the themes of his earlier,
'Aesthetic' poetry are held uniquely in balance with those of
his later, more sociopolitially oriented works" (p. 129).
Assorted "historical turns" seem to have been reflected
in the year's new volume of Rossetti letters and biographical
traces of lost historical figures such as Rebecca and Simeon Solomon and
under-appreciated ones such as Lucy and William Michael Rossetti. Morris
scholars, for their part, have focused much of their attention on his
quasi-historical prose romances, long narrative poems, political essays,
and evocations of "pilgrims, guests and refugees" in his time
and ours.