ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITIES IN HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT.
Mitchell, Margaret E.
Abstract
The changing nature of human resource management fostered the
development of entrepreneurial activities in human resource management.
Some of these changes were forced on human resource management through
activities such as downsizing, which affected human resource staff as
well as other employees. Other changes were the consequence of human
resource management's need to demonstrate its ability to add value
to a firm. Entrepreneurial activity was demonstrated through an
entrepreneurial philosophy, treating other departments within the firm
as customers when they utilized the services of human resource
departments, and the development of new firms who provided human
resource services. Like all entrepreneurial endeavors, human resource
entrepreneurs have varied in their success.
The successful entrepreneurs have been able to identify better and
more cost-effective ways to provide human resource services. They also
have demonstrated the ability of human resource management to add value
to a firm.
The field of human resource management typically has not been
associated with entrepreneurial activities. In fact, some observers
might argue that "entrepreneurial human resource management"
is an oxymoron. However, analysis of changes in human resource
management reveal that entrepreneurial activities indeed have occurred.
Some of these activities resulted from a changing business environment.
Other changes were consequences of changes in the field human resource
management.
In this paper entrepreneurial activities in human resource
management are examined by first analyzing changes occurring in the
field of human resource management during the past few decades.
Entrepreneurial and intrapreneurial activities in human resource
management are then described. Finally, the resulting changes for the
field of human resource management are discussed.
The Changing Nature of Human Resource Management
Human resource management has changed in various ways during the
past few decades. Some of these changes are technical ones in which
activities such as selection and human resource planning have become
more complex and quantitative. Some of these changes are due to external
factors such as technology, the legal environment, customer demands,
foreign competition, or the globalization of business. Still other
changes are due to basic value changes that require greater
accountability from all parts of the firm.
The changing values are reflected in the expectation that all
functions in a firm demonstrate their worth by demonstrating their
ability to add value to the firm.
Human resource management has been criticized for being too
expensive and providing no added value since no measurable business
value could be demonstrated (Csoka, 1995). Therefore, human resource
departments had to transform themselves from cost centers to tools of
corporate strategy (Carrig, 1997). Any part of a firm that does not add
real value can be removed through downsizing, restructuring, or
outsourcing.
Human resources has always had a service role in the firm, but this
role needed to change to a new role for human resources--that is,
business partner (Beatty & Schneir, 1997). Closer analysis of the
various activities within human resource management reveals that some
activities are cost centers (for example, benefits administration), but
others do create value
(Becker & Gerhart, 1996). For example, recruitment, selection,
performance management, and training can add significant value to a
firm.
The changes in human resource management also require human
resource professionals to scrutinize carefully their own value to the
firm. They must adopt a new paradigm that requires identifying the cost
of specific actions and/or decisions, relating these costs to specific
outcomes, and deciding whether or not the cost is worth the outcome(s).
The requirement for bringing value to the firm applies to human resource
professionals as well as to all other people. In some cases the results
of this analysis may lead to a decision to eliminate specific human
resource functions and/or staff.
Human resources can be a unique source of sustained competitive
advantage. This is especially true when its parts have high internal and
external fit (Baird & Meshoulam, 1988; Lengnick-Hall &
Lengnick-Hall, 1988).
Entrepreneurial Activities in Human Resource Management
Since human resource management needs to be a value-added function,
the cost and benefits of the human resource function have been analyzed in order to maximize the value of any resources directed toward this
function. This analysis requires consideration of specific human
resource functions (that is, job analysis, human resource planning,
recruitment, selection, compensation system development, benefits
administration, performance appraisal, career planning, training, etc.).
Each function is analyzed to determine whether or not services related
to this function should continue. If the specific services are
considered worth providing, the next decision requires identifying the
most cost-effective way to provide these services. Should the firm
provide these services or should these services be provided by someone
outside the firm?
The process of analyzing the cost-effectiveness of specific human
resource functions has led to specific changes and entrepreneurial
activities related to human resource management. The most obvious
outcomes of these changes are outsourcing all or some of the human
resource activities, an entrepreneurial philosophy of the human resource
professionals providing services to other parts of the firm, and the
development of human resource firms who provide the services to firms
who have outsourced some or all of their human resource function.
Outsourcing All or Some of the Human Resource Activities
When an organization is deciding whether or not to outsource a
specific function, the usual criteria for making this decision concern
the place of the function in the overall business strategy. If the
function is considered "non-core," it is a likely target for
outsourcing. When a firm outsources strategically and emphasizes its
core competencies, it can leverage its skills and resources in order to
make it more competitive.
By doing this the firm can concentrate its resources on a set of
core competencies in which it can achieve preeminence and provide unique
value to its customers (Quinn, Doorley, & Paquette, 1990). A
carefully planned outsourcing of specific human resource activities can
help a firm gain or retain its competitive advantage (Jeffay, Bohannon,
& Laspisa, 1997).
When downsizing became a method for cost cutting and/or increasing
shareholder value, most firms looked to the human resource department to
reduce the number of employees. When this was accomplished, human
resource departments then were asked to reduce the headcount in their
own department. They moved from being the implementers of downsizing to
the target of downsizing (Greer, Youngblood, & Gray, 1999). Many
human resource departments saw their size decrease dramatically (Csoka,
1995).
Therefore, firms who see human resources as a non-core function
often will decide to outsource all or some of the human resource
function. This outsourcing is made to outside vendors who can perform
the specific human resource function(s) better, faster, and more
cost-effectively (Davidson, 1998).
In general, firms should first outsource the less critical areas of
human resources--for example, payroll. They can outsource other
activities after they have gained experience from outsourcing these less
critical functions (Quinn & Hilmer, 1994). Carrig (1997) offered a
specific classification of human resource activities that identifies a
recommended order for outsourcing human resource activities.
Carrig's (1997) classification includes three categories:
transactional, traditional, and transformational. The transactional
activities are the easiest to outsource. These activities include (in
order from least difficult to most difficult to outsource) benefits
administration, record keeping, employee services, communication, and
performance management. Traditional activities are moderately difficult
to outsource. These activities include (in order from least difficult to
most difficult to outsource) training, recruiting, employee and labor
relations, compensation, and management development. Transformational
activities are the most difficult to outsource. These activities include
(in order from least difficult to most difficult to outsource) business
partner, strategic planning, organization development, and knowledge
management.
Outsourcing of human resources started as a way to control human
resource costs. Its popularity is gaining, but it is not a new concept
(Haynes, 1999). Now outsourcing of human resources is seen as a
strategic tool that heightens efficiency and allows firms to focus on
their core business. Also, the popularity of mergers and acquisitions
makes firms concerned about controlling fixed costs such as the wages
for the human resource department (Gault, 1998).
The use of outsourcing can change the nature of human resources.
Carrig's (1997) analysis of human resource practices lead to the
conclusion that the human resource department of the future will have
its greatest value if it extends outsourcing to a strategic partnership.
In this way outsourcing is more than shifting the responsibility of
specific tasks to a contractor.
An example of the partnership model for outsourcing is provided by
the relationship between Corning and CCFL (College Center of the Finger
Lakes), a nonprofit education and training organization founded as a
consortium of colleges and chartered by the New York Board of Regents.
Corning gradually shifted responsibility for much of its training from
Corning's training department to CCFL. Corning still monitors the
quality of the training provided by CCFL, and Corning does NOT outsource
training related to the firm's core competencies. The initial
partnership started by having CCFL administer sixty skill courses while
Corning retained responsibility for education and training processes.
This partnership progressed to a point where CCFL and Corning formed a
joint organization in which CCFL managed skills courses, administered
core competency courses, and developed training curricula; Corning
installed systems and provided consulting. In the final stages of this
partnership CCFL was responsible for delivering all training courses
while the Corning training department provided strategic leadership, was
responsible for the training content of employee orientation and
leadership courses, focused on competency centered learning, and
conducted research (DeRose & McLaughlin, 1995).
Corning's training department was characterized as
entrepreneurial before the partnership with CCFL (DeRose &
McLaughlin, 1995). It continued to be entrepreneurial with its
partnership with CCFL, which was mutually beneficial. Corning was able
to outsource most of its training to CCFL and control training costs.
CCFL was able to expand its market, develop its entrepreneurial skills,
and learn from a topnotch corporate training department (DeRose &
McLaughlin, 1995).
An Entrepreneurial Philosophy of the Human Resource Professionals
Providing Services to Other Parts of the Firm
When firms identified separate business units, human resource
departments often were not identified initially as a business unit. They
generated costs, not income. Therefore, they could not produce profits.
However, when human resource management departments are expected to
deliver economic value, a firm's various constituencies are willing
to pay for these services (Beatty & Schneir, 1997).
As human resource departments developed and, in some cases,
redefined their role in the firm, they proved that they could also
generate income and, therefore, profits. This change often was
accomplished by defining other departments in the firm as internal
customers. The human resource department provided services needed by
other departments--for example, training and recruitment. Therefore,
internal customers could pay the human resource department for these
services in the same way that they could hire an outside vendor to
provide these services.
If a truly competitive model is used, departments or business units
within a firm can be allowed to choose who will provide needed human
resource services--the firm's human resource department or one of
various outside vendors. Under such a model the human resource
department is forced to adopt an entrepreneurial philosophy and look for
better and more cost-effective ways to provide human resource services.
If other business units are potential internal customers for the human
resource department, the human resource department must create services
that satisfy these internal customers and demonstrate value (Csoka,
1994).
Examples of this model are provided by Hewlett-Packard and Levi
Strauss. Hewlett-Packard has a personnel manager in most of its
divisions. These personnel managers purchase services through the
regional or national organization. Levi Strauss developed a human
resource consulting unit that does research on best practices and
provides consulting services (Csoka, 1994).
Development of Human Resource Firms Who Provide the Services to
Firms Who Have Outsourced Some or All of Their Human Resource Function
When firms outsource one or more human resource activities, these
activities still must be performed successfully. In some cases these
activities are performed by consulting firms who have existed for many
years and developed expertise in one or more human resource areas (for
example, Hay Associates). In other cases increased outsourcing has
resulted in new opportunities for entrepreneurial firms who provide the
needed human resource services. In fact, some of the new entrepreneurs
are the human resource staff who formerly worked for one of the firms
who has decided to outsource some of its human resource activities.
As outsourcing has increased, the amount of money directed to
outside vendors obviously increased. Davidson (1998) described the
amount of outsourcing revenue as "skyrocketing."
A summary of this outsourcing revenue (described in a survey
completed by Staffing Industry Analysts, Inc.) projected 1997
outsourcing revenues as increasing 35 percent over 1996 revenues.
Results of this study suggested that there was no end in sight for this
record breaking growth (Davidson, 1998). A consultant with The Search
Alliance, Inc., also forecasts continued growth in this area (Haynes,
1999).
Some of the entrepreneurial activity for human resource services
has occurred not only in entrepreneurial human resource firms, but also
in larger established firms who have expanded related services to
include human resource activities. For example, Pricewaterhouse Coopers
(PwC) and the HRIS/Payroll software vendor PeopleSoft have formed an
alliance that allows them to offer human resource services needed by
firms who choose to outsource.
They formerly provided services such as retirement planning, health
and welfare planning, and stock-related administration. They expanded
their services to include human resource services such as recruiting,
applicant screening, pre-employment testing, and orientation for new
hires. Newer services include payroll processing, compensation
administration, training advice, performance management, human resource
data maintenance, change management, employee communication, relocation
services, expatriate administration, and termination processing. The
addition of these services moves PwC-Peoplesoft toward a point where
they can provide "one-stop shopping" for firms who decide to
outsource human resource activities (Gunsauley, 1999). Obviously, the
ability to offer such a wide range of services is extremely attractive
to firms who are outsourcing human resource activities and are looking
for an outside vendor to provide these services.
Intrapreneurial Activities in Human Resource Management
Pinchot (1985) brought attention to the activities of
intrapreneurs, whom he described as "dreamers who do" -- that
is, the people who take responsibility for creating any kind of
innovation within an organization. Intrapreneurs may create or invent,
but they always are able to turn an idea into a profitable reality.
Intrapreneurship is not a new idea. More than a hundred years ago
John Patterson, the founder of National Cash Register, created a plan in
which employees were paid for their ideas (Terazono, 1999). However, the
importance of intrapreneurship has grown recently. Large firms want to
compete, so they have sought out characteristics such as flexibility,
growth, and innovation that are usually associated with entrepreneurship (Stevenson & Jarillo, 1990). Intrapreneurship is a way to stimulate
innovation and use the creative energy of employees. The resources and
independence given to employees allows them to innovate within the firm
(Carrier, 1996).
Pinchot (1985) cited examples of intrapreneurial successes for
products such as the Post-it notes produced by 3M, the Pontiac Fiero produced by GM, and the personal computer produced by IBM. He referred
to intrapreneuring in a service industry by describing banking
innovations such as certificates of deposit and Master Charge.
Other authors (for example, Bordeaux, 1987; Luchsinger & Bagby,
1987; Ross & Unwalla, 1986) have analyzed the characteristics of
intrapreneurs. Some authors (for example, Ellis, 1985; Knight, 1987;
Lessem, 1987; Roner, 1988) described the roles and functions of
intrapreneurs. Other authors (for example, Clark 1999; Pryor &
Shays, 1993) describe ways to maximize the success of intrapreneurial
efforts.
The aforementioned authors' advice for encouraging
intrapreneurs is applicable to any field (including human resources).
However, it is important to note the fact that these authors did not
cite human resource management as a likely place to find intrapreneurs.
Examples of intrapreneurial human resource activities were
certainly not so dramatic as those found in manufacturing, but they have
occurred and continue to occur. Intrapreneurial human resource
activities occur primarily in two ways: (1) intrapreneurs in a firm
develop services that can be sold to other firms (2) intrapreneurs in
two or more firms work together to provide services that can be sold to
a third party.
Intrapreneurs Within a Single Firm
Employees in human resource departments (or units within human
resource departments) can become intrapreneurs when they develop ideas
for providing human resources in a new way or to new customers. IBM,
Disney, and Xerox all provide excellent examples of this type of change.
In 1992 IBM unveiled a new company called Workforce Solutions that
operated within IBM. Workforce Solutions offers human resource services
and programs to IBM and other firms. Walt Disney Company operated Disney
University as part of its human resource and community relations departments. Disney University sells human resource experience and
knowledge to other firms.
Xerox Corporation formed Human Resource Solutions in response to
the large number of benchmarking requests Xerox had received from other
firms. Xerox's Human Resource Solutions has become a business
within Xerox Corporation (Laabs, 1995).
Intrapreneurs in Two or More Firms Working Together
In order to achieve economies of scale, the human resource
departments of several firms can work together to form a new corporation
that provides human resource services to any number of firms. This
approach, which has been referred to as "inside-outsourcing,"
is relatively new (Csoka, 1995). It was used by the human resource
departments of nine Fortune 1000 firms in recent years to place the
human resource function virtually out of the parent companies. The new
firm can sell human resource services back to the parent company
(Goldsmith, 1995). They also can sell services on the open market to
firms other than the parent companies.
The operation of this type of human resource organization allows
the parent organizations to treat the new human resource organization as
a free agent operating in a competitive environment.
When the initial contract period is over, parent companies use the
performance of the human resource organization as a basis for deciding
on any future purchase of services. Parent companies are free to decide
whether or not they want to continue purchasing all or some of the
services provided by the human resource organization. Key human resource
professionals in the new human resource organization are partners in the
new business in which they own stock. An advisory board, composed of top
human resource leaders, helps the human resource organization maximize
the quality of service delivery so they maintain a competitive advantage
(Csoka, 1995).
Discussion and Conclusion
The field of human resource management initially may seem like an
unlikely place for entrepreneurial activities. However, it is a place
where various entrepreneurial activities have occurred.
These entrepreneurial activities have resulted in new and better
ways to provide human resource services. Some of these entrepreneurial
activities have occurred through classic ways by the development of new
firms started by entrepreneurs with expertise in human resource
management. Other entrepreneurial activities have occurred through new
activities and/or partnerships between existing firms or through
intrapreneurial activities by human resource departments.
The development of these entrepreneurial activities has reinforced
the development of human resource management as a function that adds
value to a firm. Like all changing activities, any changes in human
resource activities or method delivery must be monitored carefully to
guarantee its success. The advantages and disadvantages of encouraging
and utilizing the services of specific human resource entrepreneurs must
be carefully assessed before deciding to value these entrepreneurs more
than human resource professionals who operate in more traditional human
resource departments.
In general, the most successful human resource entrepreneurs are
found in firms known for quality human resource management. This finding
is especially apparent when human resource management is one of the
firm's core competencies.
Table 1 Continuum of human resource activities
Benefits Administration
Record Keeping
Transactional
Employee services
Communication
Performance management
Training
Recruiting
Traditional
Employee Relations & Labor
Compensation
Management Development
Business Partner
Transformational
Strategic Planning
Organizational Development
Knowledge Management
References
Baird, L., & Meshoulam, I. (1988). Managing two fits of
strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 13,
116-128.
Beatty, R.W.; Schneir, C.E. (1997). New HR roles to impact
organizational performance: From `partners' to `players.'
Human Resource Management, 36, 29-37.
Becker, B.; Gerhart, B. (1996). The impact of human resource
management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects.
Academy of Management Journal, 39, 779-801.
Bordeaux, D. B. (1987). Entrepreneurship. Manage, 39, 2-4.
Carrier, C. (1996, December). Intrapreneurship in small businesses:
An exploratory study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice [Online], 21,
Issue 1, p5. EbscoHost Academic Search Elite FullTEXT.
Carrig, K. (1997). Reshaping human resource for the next
century-lessons from a high flying airline. Human resource management,
36, 277-289.
Clark, S. (1999, December). Discovering the octagon of
"intrapreneuring." Long Island Business News [Online], 46,
Issue 20, p43A. EbscoHost Business Source Elite FullTEXT.
Csoka, L. S. (1995). Rethinking human resources: A research report.
New York: The Conference Board.
Davidson, L. (1998, October). Cut away non-core HR. Workforce
[Online], 77, 41-46. EbscoHost Academic Search FullTEXT.
DeRose, G. J.; McLaughlin, J. (1995). Outsourcing through
partnership. Training and Development, 51-55.
Ellis, J. (1985). Starting a small business inside a big one.
Money, 14, 85-90.
Gault, Y. (1998, October). Outsourcing to avoid
`adminis-trivia.' Crain's New York Business [Online], 14, 40.
EbscoHost Academic Search FullTEXT.
Goldsmith, M. (1995). Inside-outsourcing of the human resources
function. Concept presentation. California: Kellty, Goldsmith, & Co.
Greer, C.R.; Youngblood, S.A.; Gray, D.A. (1999, October). Human
resource management outsourcing: The make or buy decision. Academy of
Management Executive [Online], 13, 85-96. EbscoHost Academic Search
FullTEXT.
Gunsauley, C. (1999, October). PWC partners with PeopleSoft to
create total HR/benefits outsourcing solution. Employee Benefits News
[Online], 13, 70-71. EbscoHost Academic Search FullTEXT. [1999, Oct.
27].
Haynes, J. (1999, January). Human resources moving outside of
traditional spot. Business Journal: Serving Jacksonville & Northeast
Florida [Online], 14, 8. EbscoHost Academic Search FullTEXT.
Jeffay, J., Bohannon, S., & Laspisa, E. K. (1997). Beyond
benefits: the changing face of HR outsourcing. Benefits Quarterly,
41-45.
Knight, R. M. (1987). Corporate innovation and entrepreneurship: A
Canadian study. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4,
284-297.
Laabs, J. L. (1995). HR for profit: Selling expertise. Personnel
Journal, May, 84-87.
Lengnick-Hall, C. A., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (1988). Strategic
human resource management: A review of the literature and a proposed
typology. Academy of Management Review, 13, 454-470.
Lessem, R. (1987). Intrapreneurship: How to be an enterprising individual in a successful business. Aldershot, U. K.: Wildwood House.
Luchsinger, V., & Bagby, D. R. (1987). Entrepreneurship and
intrapreneurship: Behaviors, comparisons, and contrasts. S.A.M. Advanced
Management Journal, 52, 10-13.
Pinchot, G. (1985). Intrapreneuring. New York: Harper & Row.
Pryor, A. K., & Shays, M. (1993, December). Growing the
business with intrapreneurs. Business Quarterly [Online], 57, Issue 3,
p42. EbscoHost Business Source Elite FullTEXT.
Quinn, J. B., Doorley, T. L., & Paquette, P. C. (1990).
Technology in services: Rethinking strategic focus. Sloan Management
Review, Winter, 79-87.
Quinn, J.B.; Hilmer, F.G. (1994). Strategic outsourcing. Sloan
Management Review, 35, 43-55.
Roner, J. (1988). Individual entrepreneurship: A tentative synthesis. In Advances in the study of entrepreneurship, innovation, and
economic growth, 2, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 243-267.
Ross, J. E., & Unwalla, D. (1986). Who is an intrapreneur?
Personnel, December, 45-49.
Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, P. M. (1990). A paradigm of
entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management
Journal, II, Summer, 17-27.
Terazono, E. (1999, December). Fresh impetus from need to innovate:
intrapreneurship. The Financial Times Limited Financial Times_ (London)
[Online]. June 25, p9. Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe.
Margaret E. Mitchell Associate Professor, Department of Management
& Organization Connecticut State University New Britain, CT
06050-4010