History of the Polish Reformation and Nine Related Documents.
Littell, Franklin H.
Two generations ago, the professorship on the Reformation was the
key appointment in Protestant theological seminaries. With the rise of
ecumenical and interfaith activities, in many centers for training the
clergy the center of gravity has shifted in the curriculum. The
specialists, Roman Catholic as well as Protestant, still find the
sixteenth century endlessly attractive. How much of this gets
transmitted to the rising generations is open to question.
The volumes by Lindberg (Boston University School of Theology) and
McGrath (Oxford University) are well written, equipped with
bibliographies and other references, and can serve well to introduce
students to the topics surveyed. in font, covers, binding, and
illustrations both are beautiful presentations by the publisher (though
the present McGrath volume is a Baker paper reprint).
Lindberg's The European Reformations is intended for use as a
textbook, and it breaks little new ground in its treatment of the spread
of the Reformation. His treatment of the "Radical Reformation"
is conventional and brief, although he does see that the Anabaptist
circle around Grebel marked the beginning of the Free Church movement
(p. 212). There is no mention of the Polish Reformation, in which both
Anabaptist and Unitarian influences were powerful, and the twelfth
chapter, on the Reformation in the Netherlands, misses the critical
point that the Reformation first came to the lowlands in its radical
forms. Overall, the book's most creative insight is the
author's exposition of the force of anticlericalism at critical
junctures: at the height of the Renaissance (pp. 53-55), at the opening
of the Lutheran Reformation (pp. 160-163), and in the English
Reformation (pp. 309-310). This critical mindset grew broader and deeper
and in some circles developed into a repudiation of the whole power
structure and idea of corpus christianum.
McGrath's Intellectual Origin surveys, with extensive
footnotes, the two great intellectual movements of the late Middle Ages:
scholasticism and humanism. He shows how the two great Reformation
movements, Lutheranism and Calvinism, were distinctly different in how
they mined these lodes. Especially helpful for ecumenical purposes is
the author's explanation of the way the motto ad fontes opened the
way to study of rabbinical sources on the Hebrew Scriptures.
"Commentaries and glosses were to be by-passed, in order to engage
directly with the text itself. ..The slogan ad fontes was more than
simply a call to return to ancient sources -- it was a call to return to
the essential realities of human existence as reported in these literary
sources' (p. 40).
From the Humanists, the restless theological spirits mastered
Latin -- and poked fun at the miserable state of Latin in the church
establishment. As they moved from critique to reformation, they added
Hebrew and Greek to their intellectual artillery. Pico della Mirandola and Lorenzo Valla used Hebrew sources to expose errors in the Vulgate,
with the implication that errors in doctrine followed thereon (p. 131).
At the onset of the Reformation, introductory volumes by Pellikan and
Reuchlin facilitated the spread of Hebrew. The aim was to open up access
to the Word of God without errors or glosses. Hebrew was introduced into
the theological curriculum at Wittenberg in 1518.
Stressing the importance of the sources initially was accompanied
by emphasis upon the historical and literal sense of the text. The three
other traditional approaches to scripture -- allegorical, anagogical,
and tropological -- were shoved aside. Soon, however, teachers were
confronting the problem that close study of the message of the Hebrew
Scriptures often brought spiritual openness to Judaism. This danger was
warded off, in the main, by expanding the typological approach to the
Tanakh: According to the dictation of the Spirit, the interpreter was
able to read christological significance in passages of the "Old
Testament" (p. 157). The McGrath study thus provides some insights
of use in today's dialogue between Christians and Jews, referring
to openings in the magisterial Reformation to Hebrew sources and
commentaries that are missing in the textbook by Lindberg.
The authoritative volume by Williams (Harvard) relates an
important part of the record of the Reformation era and provides in
translation documents that arc virtually unknown even to most scholars
of the period. (Neither Lindberg nor McGrath appears to be aware of this
phase of the sixteenth-century Reformation.) In the end, the
Counter-Reformation was successful in virtually wiping out in Poland
both the Magisterial Reformation and the Radical Reformation. It comes
as a shock to be reminded, therefore, that for more than a century
Poland -- then the largest country in Europe -- was predominantly
Protestant and that a large section of that Protestantism was Anabaptist
and/or Unitarian.
Williams's The Radical Reformation (1962, greatly revised and
expanded in 1992) introduced a typology that has come to be used by most
serious scholars who pay attention to what McNeill and Bainton in the
previous generation called "the Left Wing of the Rcformation."
With vast learning and extensive use of primary sources in several
languages, Williams demonstrated further how different were the
state-church Reformers from the pioneers of religious liberty and the
Free Churches. In 1980 he published a two-volume history of the Polish
Brethren, and in translating and interpreting Lubieniecki's History
he has supplied students with a massive fund of primary sources. Over
sixty-five plates and maps are provided, with 132 closely reasoned pages
of explanation of their importance.
I am enormously grateful to Fortress Press for its beautiful
presentation of a volume of such size, requiring fonts in several
languages. European publishers, in some countries assisted by tax laws
that allow depreciation to be calculated over twenty years, will publish
large and worthy volumes. It is rare for an American publisher,
operating in an economy where the emphasis is on quick profit and
avoidance of long-range planning and commitments, to take on and publish
so beautifully such a volume as this.
For students of ecumenical history, the Williams volume is a vast
field of buried treasures. Many of the topics and problems that arise in
interchurch and interreligious dialogue today can be found in the
controversies and numerous colloquys in sixteenth- and
seventeenth-century Poland. At high tide, the Polish Reformation gloried
in a tolerant state, a pluralistic society, and different parties and
sodalities whose members apparently believed that their differences
could be resolved through writing and dialogue. Lubieniecki was acutely
aware of his country's role in defending European Christendom
against the incursions of the Muslim Turks and in protecting the True
Church of the restored faith of the early church from the Russian
Orthodox and Roman Catholic powers. He earnestly defended the pax
dissidentium to which rulers had sometimes agreed and included the
Mennonites under its protective cover. In his periodization of church
history, he taught that Poland was called to be the center of the true
Reformation, after its rise and fall in Saxony and in Switzerland (p.
26).
In the three books into which his History is divided, Book I
relates the corruption and fall of the church after the first century;
Book II tells how the gospel was brought to Poland; Book III narrates
the rapid growth of Reformation Christianity in Poland, the increasingly
bitter religious divisions blended with political interests, and the
bitter end in exile. Religious radicalism flourished during the golden
decades. Some envisioned a return to a primitive Jewish Christian
church, quietly awaiting the Messiah. Others followed Jacob Palaeologus
(d. 1585), an interfaith theorist who spoke of detente and understanding
among "the three peoples" (Christian, Jewish, Muslim). Some
were ardent discussants, maintaining that the mark of true Christians
was obedience to the lex sedentium (1 Cor. 14): True Christians listen
to each other and favor the language of edification above all other
vernaculars and tongues.
In the end, the religious pattern was fixed by sheer power -- the
clannish strife over conquests, successions, and prerogatives within
Poland and the political and military constellations aligned and
impinging from outside.