Molly Todd: Beyond Displacement: Campesinos, Refugees, and Collective Action in the Salvadoran Civil War.
Hellman, Judith Adler
Molly Todd
Beyond Displacement: Campesinos, Refugees, and Collective Action in
the Salvadoran Civil War
Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 2010, xviii + 286 pp.
In this impressively researched and finely written study, Molly
Todd, Assistant Professor of History at Augustana College, draws on her
previous experience in solidarity work in Central America and combines
the techniques of ethnography with those of oral history and documentary
archival investigation to bring us a compelling study of campesinos from
the northern border region of El Salvador, the "tierra
olvidada," an area of subsistence cultivation relatively
independent of the influence of commercial export agriculture. These are
people who, the author notes, live on both the figurative as well as the
literal margins of El Salvador. They provide Todd with rich narratives
and direct testimony of their experiences of poverty and exclusion,
their sufferings in the face of state violence, and their responses to
their victimization both in their "pre-flight" situation in El
Salvador and the world they came to inhabit as refugees in neighbouring
Honduras as their own country was engulfed by civil war in the 1980s.
In a book that is a model of all that a flexible interdisciplinary
approach can achieve, Todd challenges what she regards as an
"essentialized" portrait of refugee populations that is drawn
not only by conservative detractors who depict these campesinos as
failed, would-be insurgents, but also by humanitarian aid personnel who
often see refugees as passive victims, as discarded objects, as the
flotsam and jetsam of political change. With this study Todd works to
correct a portrayal of refugees that overlooks the degree to which such
people are not simply "displaced" but rather capable of
rooting themselves firmly in new, if temporary settings in which they
manage to exercise a great deal of human agency.
In short, Todd is determined to contest the image of refugees as
"ragged and poor, mute and dependent on the good will of
others" (4) and to provide a more detailed and nuanced picture of
people who were activists in the period before state violence forced
them into exile--rural people who had worked with progressive priests,
trade unionists, students, and political movements like the Popular
Revolutionary Army or ERP (Ejercito Revolucionario Popular) and the
Popular Liberation Forces or FLP (Fuerzas Populares de Liberacion) to
form their own Rural Workers' Federation. While the civil war
eventually prompted these campesinos to flee to Honduras, they retained
their organizational impulse and skills. As a consequence, they managed
to use their years of exile in Honduras to regroup and survive to
struggle another day once it would be feasible for them to return to
their homes. In essence, Todd argues against the notion that the
violence of wars necessarily creates refugees who are nothing more than
"uncategorizable peoples: the dis-placed, uprooted, stateless"
(51).
Through her use of the direct testimonies of those who were active
both before and after their flight from ravaged villages in El Salvador,
Todd demonstrates the many ways in which the refugees in Honduras
retained a sense of themselves as Salvadoran. They celebrated national
holidays and commemorated the dates related to the worst moments of the
war that had precipitated their flight. They worked to retain autonomous
decision-making capacity in their lives as refugees and struggled to
establish control over the spaces to which they were assigned in refugee
camps. They formed communal structures of self-governance and organs of
local popular power. They forged alliances with both international
organizations and the national liberation forces, even while managing to
keep their links to the FLMN largely secret from even the most
sympathetic international aid workers.
Relating their histories from the bottom up, Todd shows us how
Salvadoran campesinos actively analyzed and interpreted their condition
as poor peasants in El Salvador and as exiles in Honduras. She details
the ways in which popular education programs and the creation of
grassroots movements that asserted their identity as Salvadorans in the
refugee camps became, in the Gramscian sense, the prefiguration of the
society in which they hoped to live when, as they always assumed, they
would finally return to "repatriate" their own country. This
effort involved the articulation of commitment to broad principles of
unity, equality, and social justice. It also depended on meticulous
attention to documentation that led to their efforts to secure official
birth certificates, photo ID cards, and other papers that would enable
them to assert both their legal rights as Salvadoran citizens and
official recognition of their status from the United Nations High
Commissioner for Refugees. Finally, Todd looks at the mobilization of
refugees around "repopulation" as yet another form of
resistance, a movement for retorno that involved pressuring the UNHCR
and other international organizations, but above all the regime in power
in El Salvador to bring an end to the war.
In one of her most interesting findings, Todd notes that the period
of exile reinforced what she calls the "communal ethos" that
the refugees brought with them from El Salvador. Indeed, through the
grassroots organizations they formed as refugees and the popular
pedagogy they practiced in the camps, they worked to reinforce
principles of full participatory democracy, solidarity, unity, and
equality. However, Todd does acknowledge that the communal ethos was
also enforced through a strict code of conduct with its own set of
sanctions that included public denunciation and incarceration in prisons
set up within the refugee camps, as well as through what she delicately
refers to as "peer-enforced repatriations" and "rumors of
murder" (226).
These findings inevitably raise the question of what would be the
impact on repatriated Salvadoran peasants of a refugee experience of
communal practices reinforced through punitive measures. Do coercive
measures that correspond to the exigencies of survival in a refugee camp
necessarily carry over into the lives of people who have returned to
their homeland? This is a question that Todd may be able to answer in
the future once more documentary evidence is released, particularly FMLN
writings about the refugee camps and the security issues that arose in
the camps. In the meantime, what we do have with this excellent book is
a wealth of material on a range of issues central to any consideration
of life prospects of the marginal peasantry, the nature of the refugee
experience, the development of social movements, the repatriation of
exiled populations, and the prospects for democracy and stability in El
Salvador and more broadly in Central America.
Judith Adler Hellman, York University