Aviva Chomsky, Undocumented: How Immigration Became Illegal.
Bhuyan, Rupaleem ; Vargas, Adriana
Aviva Chomsky, Undocumented: How Immigration Became Illegal
(Boston, Beacon Press, 2015)
TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN IS the year Donald Trump, a leading
Republican Presidential candidate, infamously calls Latinos
"violent criminals," "drug runners,"
"rapists," and diseased. He promises to build an impenetrable
wall if elected to the US presidency and as late as December 2015, seems
to have won the approval of many American voters. Anti-immigrant and
specifically anti-Latino sentiment is not only prevalent, but overt and
vitriolic racism is a mainstay in US media and politics. In the past
decade, a growth of scholarship and immigrant rights activism in the
United States has raised attention to systemic racism, harassment, and
the specter of deportation that marks the daily lives of millions of
undocumented immigrants. In this context, Chomsky's book offers a
timely and comprehensive view into the economic and legal instruments
that produce undocumented immigration in the United States.
Chomsky offers a broad perspective of the historical linkages
between colonization, immigration, labour, and race-thinking in the
United States. She presents this book as a counternarrative to deeply
entrenched myths that characterize Mexican and Central American
immigrants as "illegal" and thus outside the American story.
The book effectively argues how "changes in the law deliberately
created illegality and did so for the purpose of keeping Mexican workers
available, cheap, and deportable." (22) Chomsky poses the question,
"Where did illegality come from?" to illustrate the role that
race-thinking plays in the social construction of
"illegality," specifically with regard to US dependence on
migrant labour.
The book is divided into eight chapters which address histories of
migration to the United States, specifically from Mexico and countries
in Central America. In her discussion of "True Refugees of the
Border Wars," (3) Chomsky counters the anti-immigrant rhetoric in
the United States by showing the efforts made by grassroots
organizations on both sides of the US-Mexico border. Non-profit
organizations, the Catholic Church, and even the Mexican government
offer basic necessities for survival for people who are deported by US
authorities. This section reveals the social costs of the deportation,
which is often obscured by laws that construct people as illegal. The
remainder of the introduction and Chapter 1 address the role that
immigrants have played in the creation of the United States as white
settler nation. Chomsky argues that inclusion of migrants into the body
politic produced a dual labour market linked to racial order.
Industrialized labour, which involved immigrants from Western and
Eastern Europe, enabled upward mobility, especially during the
strengthening of labour organizing and unionized work forces in the
early 20th century. In contrast, racialized labour has been organized
through racial logics, justifying chattel slavery up until the mid-19th
century, then Jim Crow laws across the American south, and the influx of
Mexican labourers through the Bracero program, through which Mexicans
were permitted to work seasonally but were unable to become permanent
residents of the United States. This dual labour market disenfranchises
racialized workers and structures their labour through relations of
inequality that undermine labour organizing for basic rights.
In Chapters 2 and 3, Chomsky draws our attention to the legal
instruments that render hundreds of thousands of migrants from Mexico
and Central America as "illegal," "criminal," and
thus deportable. To illustrate, Chomsky revisits the impact of
immigration policies in 1965, which marked the end of overt racial bias
in immigration law and which is attributed to dramatically shifting the
demographics of who could immigrate to the United States. Certainly, the
removal of racial exclusions and introduction of a new national quota
system meant that new waves of immigrants from countries in Asia,
Africa, and South America would be permitted to immigrate to the United
States in ways that was impossible before. The impact of national quotas
for immigrants from Mexico coupled with the end of the Bracero Program,
however, meant that thousands of Mexicans lost their legal right to work
in the United States. The need for their labour, however, did not abate
giving rise to a new ERA of "undocumented" work.
Chomsky compares the criminalization of immigrants with the role of
Jim Crow laws in the America south, which enabled the state to maintain
ruling relations over "freed" Blacks following emancipation.
Chomsky aptly draws links with Michelle Alexander's analysis of how
criminalization follows Black people into everyday life in similar ways
as the spectre of deportation for undocumented immigrants (Michelle
Alexander, The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of
Colorblindness, New York: New Press, 2010).
Chapters 4, 5, and 6 look closely at the everyday living conditions
of undocumented immigrants and migrants who have a precarious status.
Chomsky illustrates how racial profiling, denial of services, and
exploitative work conditions blur lines between legal and undocumented
status for people of Mexican and Central American origin. She also
describes who benefits from the criminalization of immigrants, such that
employing, policing, and detaining undocumented immigrants creates
wealth for small communities and large corporations alike. Chomsky
provides in-depth attention to major industries that rely
disproportionately on undocumented labour--agriculture, housing,
meat-packing, and food service. That multinational corporations actively
lobby local governments to increase penalties on undocumented immigrants
is well documented. More surprising is the accompanying economic
surpluses and job growth for small towns in southern states that have
passed the most draconian anti-immigration laws (e.g. Arizona, Georgia).
Despite anti-immigrant sentiment from public officials in these regions,
the incarceration of undocumented immigrants (which requires them to be
present) produces wealth for these same regions in troubling ways.
Chapter 7 illustrates the consequence on families, with some
promising insights from undocumented youth who are mobilizing to
advocate for their rights and challenging the public's notion of
who belongs.
In conclusion, this book offers a comprehensive view on social
processes that construct states of "illegality." The
straightforward writing style and use of illustrative stories makes this
book suitable to different types of audiences including the general
public, upper-level high school and undergraduate students, and
researchers. Chapters that include more technical legal information,
however, may lose some readers. The book crosses disciplinary boundaries
including history, political science, criminology, critical ethnic
studies, and social work. All in all, this book provides an adept
critique of the "criminalization of migrants" and how, in
Chomsky's words, the "complex, inconsistent, and sometimes
perverse nature of US immigration law ... makes some people
illegal." (x)
RUPALEEM BHUYAN AND ADRIANA VARGAS
University of Toronto