Leo Panitch, Greg Albo, and Vivek Chibber, eds., Socialist Register 2011: The Crisis This Time.
Cahill, Damien
Leo Panitch, Greg Albo, and Vivek Chibber, eds., Socialist Register
2011: The Crisis This Time (London: Merlin Press 2010)
SINCE 1964, the Socialist Register has published incisive analyses
of global capitalism from the world's leading radical
intellectuals. The 2011 edition lives up to this reputation. Its opening
line, "Crises have a way of clarifying things," encapsulates
both the goal and the main achievement of this excellent volume. Because
economic crises are destabilizing events of enormous magnitude they
inevitably prompt a search for causes. Such causes are always to be
found in the dynamics of the previous period of capital accumulation.
Yet how far back does one go in search of causes, and how does one sort
out the drivers of the economic crisis from its symptoms? Moreover, how
does one cut through the myths that arise as different groups compete to
impose their narrative of the nature and origins of the crisis?
This volume aims to clear the decks of the dominant narratives--of
both mainstream and progressive commentators--of the neo-liberal era and
provide a clearer understanding of the global financial crisis from a
Marxist perspective. Rather than focusing on the sub-prime implosion,
the immediate trigger for the global financial crisis, the contributions
to this edited collection recognize that probing the deeper, underlying
processes of class conflict and capital accumulation offers more
satisfying explanations for the causes of the current economic malaise.
Yet, this year's title, The Crisis This Time, also reflects the
view that, while capitalism is an inherently crisis-prone system, each
particular crisis is born of unique circumstances, and is characterized
by distinct features.
When delving into an edited collection one expects a degree of
unevenness in the quality and relevance of its various chapters. While
such unevenness is certainly present in The Crisis This Time, what
stands out even more strongly is the degree of thematic coherence across
the chapters. Most chapters, for example, produce varied empirical
evidence to show that the institutions and economic relationships
underpinning the neoliberal era also contributed to the crisis. On the
one hand, the weakening of organized labour and the flexibilization of
work led to a stagnation of real wages, particularly in the US.
Effective demand was sustained by the extension of credit to
working-class households, fuelling the asset-price bubble. This in turn
fed the growth of finance capital, partly through the ability to sell
more products, partly through the ability to securitize the debt
repayments being made by workers. At the global level, an entrenched
pattern of external balances, such as that between the US and many Asian
economies, facilitated this financial expansion.
States, many contributors point out, played a vital role in these
processes. They were active in suppressing organized labour and enabled
the expansion and transformation of finance capital through both
regulatory change and monetary policy. Such a recognition helps to
demythologize the neo-liberal era. As Hugo Radice points out in his
cogent chapter, to view the central economic variable as being "the
balance between the public and private ... between the market and state
as regulating mechanisms" is out of step with the reality of
neo-liberalism and, indeed, of capitalist economies more generally.
There are many fine contributions to this volume, the best of which
clearly and precisely link theoretical concepts to concrete economic
processes and data to illuminate the key dynamics of the current crisis.
The opening chapter, for example, by Leo Panitch and Sam Gindin, which
effectively frames the volume, takes issue with mechanistic Marxist
approaches that seek evidence of a falling rate of profit as the
perennial cause of capitalist economic crises. In contrast, Panitch and
Gindin view the crisis through the lens of historically specific class
struggle and institutional change. The key to understanding the current
crisis, they argue, is the weakness of the working class, a recognition
that offers a window into both the dominance and transformation of the
finance sector during the last four decades, and why the costs of the
crisis are being forced disproportionately onto workers.
Dick Bryan and Mike Rafferty also have a compelling and original
contribution. The chapter focuses on derivatives, most particularly on
how their growth has integrated the every-day lives of working-class
households more fully with finance capital. As workers take on credit
and the income streams thereby created are securitized, so do they
become caught up, in ways they might only be vaguely aware of, in
financial circuits. For Bryan and Rafferty, this integration makes
problematic the commonplace distinction between the "real" and
"speculative" economies, with the implication being not that
finance needs to be more heavily regulated, but that working-class
living standards should be quarantined from market dependence.
The penultimate chapter by Greg Albo and Bryan Evans also stands
out for its clarity and penetrating insights. It offers a political
economy of public sector spending during the crisis, and details the
responses to this, from above and below, across four countries, as well
as the prospects for progressive "exit strategies."
Johanna Brenner details the variegated patterns of inequality
resulting from the intersections of class, race and gender within
working-class households, before and since the onset of the crisis. The
title of this chapter, "Caught in the Whirlwind," captures the
sense of violent external forces that buffet working-class families from
one crisis to another.
Alfredo Saad-Filho argues in his chapter that we are experiencing a
"crisis in neoliberalism" rather than a "crisis of
neoliberalism." (249) The former refers to a crisis brought about
by the contradictions of the neo-liberal era but where neo-liberal
strategies of crisis management continue to be used to impose the costs
of capitalist crisis onto the working class. A crisis of neo-liberalism,
on the other hand, can only occur if workers mobilize to force the costs
of the crisis into capital, decommodifying social relations in the
process through measures such as the socialization of finance, a
strategy Saad-Filho advocates.
There is also an excellent chapter by Anwar Shaikh fusing Marxist
and Post-Keynesian analysis to situate the current crisis within
broader, long-term patterns of capitalist economic expansion and
contraction. He argues that the only just way out of the crisis is
through a social mobilization to force states to employ directly those
left without work or underemployed by the crisis. He also recognizes,
however, that this strategy is likely to be resisted by the owning class
which would view such moves as encroaching on the prerogatives of
capital.
While the volume's strength is its diagnosis of the crisis,
and an identification that the balance of class forces will
significantly determine whether or not the exit strategies from the
crisis inflict further pain on workers, its shortcoming is the paucity
of detailed consideration of progressive ways out of the crisis. Perhaps
this simply reflects the editors' assessment that "the Left
today is the weakest it has been since the defeat of the Paris
Commune" and therefore that until leftwing forces gather strength,
speculation on progressive futures remains somewhat utopian. Perhaps
more concrete alternatives will be better represented in the 2012
Register, which is a companion volume to its predecessor. Such
criticisms notwithstanding, The Crisis This Time is a fine volume and
continues a proud tradition of radical scholarship by the Socialist
Register.
DAMIEN CAHILL
University of Sydney