首页    期刊浏览 2025年12月04日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Jose A. Piqueras and Vicent Sanz Rozalen, eds., A Social History of Spanish Labour. New Perspectives on Class, Politics and Gender.
  • 作者:Shubert, Adrian
  • 期刊名称:Labour/Le Travail
  • 印刷版ISSN:0700-3862
  • 出版年度:2009
  • 期号:September
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Canadian Committee on Labour History
  • 摘要:A COLLECTION OF this sort is long overdue. Modern Spain, and especially anything that is not the Spanish Civil War, is one of the great unknowns of European history as it is done in North America. Stranded in a no person's land between the paucity of Spain specialists in Canadian and US universities, on the one hand, and the lack of interest among historians in Spain in publishing their work in English, on the other, very few books or articles on the social or cultural history of Spain in the 19th and 20th centuries see the light of day. This volume, edited by labour historians from two different generations, provides English-speaking readers with a sampler of the work in the field over the last two decades.
  • 关键词:Books

Jose A. Piqueras and Vicent Sanz Rozalen, eds., A Social History of Spanish Labour. New Perspectives on Class, Politics and Gender.


Shubert, Adrian


Jose A. Piqueras and Vicent Sanz Rozalen, eds., A Social History of Spanish Labour. New Perspectives on Class, Politics and Gender (New York: Berghahn Books 2007)

A COLLECTION OF this sort is long overdue. Modern Spain, and especially anything that is not the Spanish Civil War, is one of the great unknowns of European history as it is done in North America. Stranded in a no person's land between the paucity of Spain specialists in Canadian and US universities, on the one hand, and the lack of interest among historians in Spain in publishing their work in English, on the other, very few books or articles on the social or cultural history of Spain in the 19th and 20th centuries see the light of day. This volume, edited by labour historians from two different generations, provides English-speaking readers with a sampler of the work in the field over the last two decades.

The editors have chosen the articles to be representative of the social history of labour done since 1990 when, according to the editors, "there was a significant change in the direction" of the field, away from institutional and political history in favour of "specific problems and processes involving the formation and evolution of class." (8) At the same time, there were new academic organizations and new journals. Key among the latter was Historia Social, where Piqueras and Sanz Rozalen have leading roles and where eight of the fourteen articles originally appeared (In the interests of full disclosure, I must mention that I have been on the journal's advisory board since its launch in 1988).

The editors understand representativeness in a number of ways. Methodologically, they approach their subjects through the lenses of class formation, gender, culture, and politics. Thematically, they address both newer concerns as well as such "classic subjects" as standards of living. Chronologically, the articles cover the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries. Only one article deals with the Spanish Civil War, a good decision as this is the period non-specialists are likely to know about, while there are six about the little-known 19th century and two on the Franco period, which has become the subject of a burgeoning literature in recent years. Geographically, they deal with various parts of Spain, rural as well as urban, although given the numerical importance of agricultural labour until well into the 20th century and its prominence in labour organization and labour protest there is less on rural Spain than one would expect. The total absence of Andalucia, which does not even have an entry in the index, is hard to explain. Finally, there are articles devoted to specific occupations: laundresses, sandal makers, and miners (3 articles).

The fact that the editors were able to pick and choose from a vast field of previously published pieces means that there is less disparity in quality than is often the case with edited collections. The book begins with two think pieces: Manuel Perez Ledesma's article on the working class as a cultural creation and Pilar Perez Fuentes' methodological considerations on women in the workplace in the 19th and 20th centuries.

Perez Ledesma admits that the debates about the nature of the working class, with the exception of the work of Patrick Joyce, were well known in Spain but that the theoretical positions had been little integrated into actual studies. He examines the changes in vocabulary used to describe social realities: the meanings of the word "people," the introduction of "exploitation" as a moral term, and the use of rituals and symbols to make working people into a "historical subject," the working class. He concludes that this process, by which "sectors as diverse as agricultural day labourers, craftsmen in traditional professions, miners and a small number of industrial workers" came to accept that what united them was more significant than what divided them, began in the last twenty years of the 19th century.

Perez Fuentes starts from the position that industrialization in Western Europe always meant the creation of "a new regulatory and symbolic framework... by means of which new female and male identities were developed which were considerably different from those in pre-industrial societies," (44) but that the actual nature of the transformation varied greatly among societies. She devotes much attention to censuses, and particularly to the way their changing construction, in other European countries as well as in Spain, suggested "a universal and mythical absence of all [workplace] activity." (49) More useful as sources, in large part because they permit a more sophisticated understanding of immediate contexts and how these connected with family strategies, are the municipal registers.

The remaining articles are monographic treatments of the questions raised in the two opening pieces and they are arranged in chronological order, starting with Carmen Sarasfia's stud), of laundresses from the 18th to the 20th centuries and concluding with Jose Babiano's reflections on the Franco dictatorship's so-called "vertical unions."

All the articles were originally published in Spanish and had to be translated for this volume. The translation is generally acceptable but does stumble at times. In the introduction alone, for example, we read about "non resident lecturers," (6) profesores no numerarios in Spanish, a phrase which means nothing in English and should have been translated as "contract faculty, and about "associate workers" (8) of the First International, probably a translation of obreros asociados which should be rendered as "members."

ADRIAN SHUBERT

York University
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有