Shareen Hertel, Unexpected Power: Conflict and Change among Transnational Activists.
Thomas, Mark
Shareen Hertel, Unexpected Power: Conflict and Change among
Transnational Activists (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 2006)
As PROCESSES OF economic globalization continue to raise concerns
about the 'race to the bottom' in labour standards in both the
North and South, international institutions such as the United Nations
and International Labour Organization, as well as many labour rights
NGOS, have identified the need to promote basic rights at work as a key
challenge for the 21st century, and have sought to reframe labour rights
as fundamental human rights. In this context, new strategies to organize
for better standards have emerged in both the North and South, as
unions, NGOS, community-based organizations, and other social movements
seek to develop and advance international labour rights.
In this context, campaigns such as the anti-sweatshop movement of
the 1990s emerged out of initiatives based in the North. By using a
combination of strategies, including public-awareness tactics,
government lobbying, and consumer boycotts, Northern activists have
brought pressure to bear on large and powerful transnational
corporations (TNCS) regarding labour standards abuses in their supply
chains located in the South. Yet, as Shareen Hertel demonstrates in
Unexpected Power: Conflict and Change among Transnational Activists,
campaigns emerging from the North may be constructed in terms that fail
to effectively engage with the principles and priorities of activists in
the Southern economies they seek to transform. Thus, activists in the
South are often faced with not only labour rights abuses by TNCS, but
also the challenge of re-framing campaigns emerging from the North in
order to construct meaningful social and economic transformation. With
the globalization of economic production as a backdrop, Unexpected Power
is a study of the processes of contestation and change within campaigns
designed to promote international labour rights. Focusing on two recent
initiatives--a campaign against child labour in Bangladesh and a
campaign against workplace-based pregnancy screening in Mexico--Hertel
documents the efforts of activists in the South as they transform these
Northern-initiated campaigns by integrating local principles and
priorities.
In the early 1990s, activists and policymakers in the United States
launched a campaign against child labour in Bangladesh. The campaign
emerged in response to widespread reports of the use of child labour in
the export-oriented garment industry that had become central to the
Bangladeshi economy, us legislators threatened to enact formal trade
sanctions against garment imports from Bangladesh. us-based NGOS and
labour organizations launched campaigns to raise public awareness about
goods produced with child labour, while consumer groups planned boycotts
against such goods. Organized from the perspective of Northern
consumers, activists, and policymakers, this campaign sought to put an
end to the employment of children in Bangladesh's garment
factories. Yet this campaign was resisted by activists in Bangladesh,
who argued that the narrow focus on getting children out of factories
would simply lead to their engagement with other much more harmful forms
of subsistence, such as child prostitution, and would in no way address
the root causes that pushed children into wage labour. These activists
pressured for a much wider definition of child rights, specifically
re-framing the campaign around issues related to access to education and
basic income. As result of this process of contestation, the focus of
the initial child labour campaign indeed expanded. As Hertel documents,
the efforts of Bangladeshi activists shifted the framing of the campaign
away from minimum age of employment towards a focus on fundamental
economic rights, prompted the development of a more expansive
conceptualization of children's rights in international policy
circles, and paved the way for the development of ILO Convention 182 on
The Worst Form of Child Labour.
In 1995, Human Rights Watch (HRW), a New York-based NGO, launched a
campaign against pregnancy screening that was taking place in the
manufacturing plants along the Mexico-U.S. border. The campaign was
initiated in response to the practice of employers either firing or
refusing to hire pregnant women. This is a practice common in the border
industries as a means to avoid payment of the three months of maternity
leave required by Mexican labour law. After gathering testimony from
hundreds of women affected by this practice, Human Rights Watch filed a
complaint against Mexico under the labour standards side agreement of
NAFTA. Shortly after, women's rights activists in Mexico City
launched their own campaign against pregnancy screening. While the
primary focus of the two campaigns was the same, Mexico City activists,
like the activists in Bangladesh, constructed their campaign in much
broader terms. First, they focused not only on women in the border
region, but all those who were facing pregnancy screening from their
employers. Second, they framed their campaign not simply in terms of
discrimination in employment, but sought to connect employment/economic
rights to reproductive rights, and to direct attention to society's
responsibility for human reproduction. Unlike the child labour campaign,
however, Mexican activists did not seek to 'block' the HRW
strategy; rather, these two campaigns proceeded alongside one another,
with Mexican activists taking advantage of the political space opened by
the HRW campaign and working at the grassroots, local level to expand
the normative frame and action strategy. In terms of outcomes, while the
HRW complaint to the NAFTA labour standards accord produced ministerial
consultations and outreach sessions, these had little concrete impact at
the workplace level. As for the campaign launched by Mexican activists,
it succeeded in expanding the normative frame from one of employment
discrimination to one of women's economic and reproductive rights.
Yet, practices of pregnancy screening continue. Thus, according to
Hertel, the legacy of these campaigns is still debated. Regardless, this
case provides another example of the ways in which the actions of
activists in the South may contribute to an expansion of the normative
frame and strategic practices of campaigns originating from the North.
In addition to describing these campaigns, Hertel seeks to also
develop new concepts aimed at explaining how campaigns are transformed
through the framing strategies of movement activists. For example, she
introduces the concept of 'blocking' to explain the ways
Bangladeshi activists contested the anti-child labour frame of us
campaigners. And she describes the Mexican activists' strategy of
broadening the frame of the HRW campaign as involving 'backdoor
moves.' Explanation is provided throughout the text as to how these
are new ways of thinking about the construction of social movement
campaigns. Yet, it is in this theoretical intervention that the book
shows its limitations, as these concepts fail to add theoretical
clarity, and simply end up sounding like academic jargon. Nonetheless,
with a research methodology well-grounded in a large number of
interviews with campaign activists, the text clearly delivers on its
primary point: that challenges to corporate globalization will be most
effectively constructed when they emerge from the grassroots in the
locales where they are meant to directly impact. It is a resource that
will be of great interest to those teaching and conducting research in
the areas of both social movements and international labour rights.
The struggle to advance international labour rights has emerged as
a key site of transnational activist organizing in the contemporary
global economy. Campaigns and efforts to improve and promote labour
rights like those described in this book illustrate the ways in which
transnationalism 'from below' has emerged to counter the power
of TNCS and corporate-led globalization. By forcefully pointing to the
ways in which activists in the South have transformed these campaigns,
challenging not only the TNCS, but also the terms through which
campaigns are constructed in the North, Unexpected Power provides an
important contribution to our understandings of the true dynamics of
grassroots organizing in the global economy.
MARK THOMAS
York University