Steve Vineberg, High Comedy in American Movies: Class and Humour from the 1920s to the Present.
Forsyth, Scott
Steve Vineberg, High Comedy in American Movies: Class and Humour
from the 1920s to the Present (Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield 2005)
THIS BOOK provides a concise, accessible, and entertaining critical
tour through some of the most beloved and celebrated of Hollywood films.
The tight focus of this genre study is on those comedies of the upper
classes filled with charming characters, sharp banter, and delightfully
romantic, if often bittersweet, resolutions.
Vineberg's favoured sub-genre, high comedy, or interchangeably
comedy of manners, is rooted in the English and French theatre, from
Congreve and Sheridan to Marivaux, "modernized" by Wilde and
Coward. Vineberg is interested in how this aristocratic lineage
interacts with the democratic and egalitarian ideologies of America, and
with Hollywood's inveterate populism, to produce the cinematic
variations he follows from the twenties to the contemporary.
Vinberg begins by distinguishing Hollywood's high comedy from
all its other comic traditions--including romantic, burlesque,
hard-boiled, situation, sentimental, parody, satire, farce, and black
comedy. This exhaustive list is collected by example--for burlesque, the
Keystone Cops to the Farrelly Brothers; for parody, the benign spoofs of
the Austin Powers series--to tell us what high comedy is not.
Then, Vineberg provides high comedy with a much more elaborate set
of fourteen conventions that define it over the decades, luxuriously
familiar to experienced Hollywood watchers. These are films set among
the rich--if no longer the literal aristocracy of Europe, an elite of
money--and the expected costumes, settings, objects, and elaborate
social rules of the wealthy. We expect a special style among the elite,
above all "extraordinary conversation"--the sparkling wit,
spontaneity, and vitality of these golden people. He is thrilled by the
theatrically descended acting styles that embody this high style. This
is the charm of a liberal world with the comic liberation of alcohol and
worldly appreciation of the erotic. The plot and character conventions
become thematic as well; such films resolve in conservative and
optimistic fashion, in a charmingly make-believe status quo. Just as
important for Vineberg, they often combine their light touch with
melancholic profundity. This elaborate melange of style and themes
allows a rather artificial categorization of films that are in or out of
consideration--this judgement by genre definition can be annoying--but
Vineberg is supple enough to see that what he cherishes in the high
comic has migrated into other kinds of comedies and even further afield
across Hollywood history.
Vineberg begins his historical chronicle in the twenties and
thirties. Hollywood creates a vision of Europe in many adaptations of
European plays: "Paris, Vienna, and Budapest settings became
metaphors for elegance, exoticism, magic." It is a fantasy that
sells in America and back in Europe. Many of these silent comedies,
talkies, and even musical operettas, engaged the steady stream of
European directors, writers, and actors who were emigrating to
California from the mid-twenties on, an importation and integration of
foreign artistry that continues throughout Hollywood history. Vineberg
memorializes this classic Hollywood: the early American performances of
Dietrich, or the masterful comedies of Lubitsch--The Merry Widow,
Trouble in Paradise, The Shop around the Corner.
The heart of the book explains the particularly American style of
high comedy that develops in the thirties. This importation is from
Broadway, especially the plays of Philip Barry. Vineberg presents loving
evocations of the most famous films--The Philadelphia Story and
Holiday--and the sublime performances of Cary Grant and Katherine
Hepburn. This is entertaining criticism, though Vineberg skates over
long-time feminist objections to the ways in which matrimonial resolutions tame Hepburn's feisty heroine. It would also have been
interesting to square the films' class conservatism with the
politics of the screenwriter, well-known Communist Donald Ogden Stewart.
The most interesting sections of the book focus on films not
usually considered comic. Vineberg uses high comic conventions to
explore class in classic dramas--The Magnificent Ambersons, The Letter,
The Heiress, Dodsworth. Vineberg even firmly declares that "there
were no pure high comedies" made in Hollywood from 1940 to 1969.
But he follows the high comic into thrillers, film noir, and melodrama.
He has original takes on diverse favourites: Rebecca, Strangers on a
Train, Caught and the melodramas about Hollywood, The Bad and The
Beautiful, A Star is Bom, Sunset Boulevard.
Like many film historians, Vineberg considers the late sixties and
early seventies to be a new golden age for Hollywood. With little to say
about why this might be, Vineberg delights in smart, young directors who
re-invent the comedy of manners--often refiguring the aristocracy as
"hip" or media celebrities--in a period filled with memorable
hits. Vineberg is impressed with the gentle satires of Paul
Mazursky--Bob and Carol and Ted and Alice, Alex in Wonderland, Blume in
Love. He compares Shampoo to Renoir's Rules of the Game to
underline the painful melancholy that runs through all these comedies.
But, to Vineberg, the modern master of high comedy is Robert Altman and
Nashville its finest American accomplishment. These are some of the very
few high comedies Vineberg considers to have a political edge, albeit
darkly pessimistic.
The contemporary examples of high comedy Vineberg finds are few and
far between. Later work by Mazursky and Altman--Down and Out in Beverly
Hills, The Player, Gosford Park--and a few brilliant singular films,
foregrounded against the Hollywood fodder by his generic lens--The Ice
Age, Six Degrees of Separation--are highlighted.
The limitations of this book flow from its narrowly defined
ambition. Vineberg offers a particular kind of film scholarship, genre
criticism, the most popular reading of film for both makers and
audience. This gives the book vitality: the provocation of the
reader--what, not a word about Bringing Up Baby!? However, the
evaluation of genre films and the judgement of performance that is
important to Vineberg's emphasis on style are notoriously slippery
and populist discourses and the book often becomes mere plot reprise,
then magisterial judgment in a "best of ..." ranking, more
tasting than analysis.
Similarly, Vineberg avoids the obscurantist jargon of Theory that
has plagued film studies for years but uses a casual under-theorized
approach. Most important, Vineberg proposes no serious definition of
class--sociological, historical, or political--so the study remains on
the level of the films--impressions, nuance, style, and status--with no
sense of actual class position, or class as relationship, or change in
class structure. Scholarship on class and film has recently returned to
film studies in important ways: the representation of the working class,
the labour and politics of film creators themselves, the intersection
with race and gender. Vineberg's focus on the upper class in these
comedies is welcome but narrow; we are shown that the films reflect
class, and ideals of class, in America and that class becomes a
spectacle for pleasurable consumption. Bur the argument remains
undeveloped.
Finally, the book rushes through eight decades bur there is little
sense of historical periodization or causation. (I pondered the
announcement that "the war years coarsened the sensibility of
Hollywood movies" for a long time.) In recent work, film historians
have considerably widened the study of film with archival research and a
deeper contextualization in both political economy and media culture.
Vineberg brings theatre back into our understanding of Hollywood but
provides a gloss, not a film history.
This is a book rather like the comedies it celebrates--witty and
graceful, wearing its erudite roots in theatre history lightly, but
leaving us with a sharp sense there is something to explore more deeply.
Scott Forsyth
York University