Kathy L. Brock and Keith G. Banting, eds., The Nonprofit Sector in Interesting Times: Case Studies in a Changing Sector.
Shields, John
Kathy L. Brock and Keith G. Banting, eds., The Nonprofit Sector in
Interesting Times: Case Studies in a Changing Sector (Montreal and
Kingston: School of Policy Studies, Queen's University and
McGill-Queen's University Press 2003)
IN THEIR EDITED collection, The Nonprofit Sector in Interesting
Times: Case Studies in a Changing Sector, Kathy Brock and Keith Banting
bring together a set of papers concerned with examining various aspects
of Canadian nonprofit organizations operating in an environment
characterized by profound change. This is the third volume in the
"Public Policy and Third Sector Series" and the chapters here,
as in the previous volumes, have their origins in a program of
competitive research grants awarded through the School of Policy Studies
at Queen's University. As such this collection represents a
somewhat loose grouping of papers, and is marked by an unevenness common
to edited volumes.
Brock and Banting state that "no one theme governed ... the
works included" in this edition. (ix) However, an implicit theme
captured in the book's title may be said to unite the work. While
the chapters range widely in their focus, "from the relationship of
voluntary agencies with governments and funders, to internal
decision-making of voluntary organizations, to the changing regulatory
environment of organizations, to the difficulties of coordinated action
among these organizations," (x) the common link is that each
chapter is concerned with how nonprofit organizations have adjusted to
function in a period of deep restructuring.
The importance of this volume rests in large measure in the growing
significance of nonprofit organizations in our lives. Until recently the
role of nonprofit institutions in society had been virtually absent from
Canadian academic analysis and policymakers were also largely unaware of
their contributions to the 'public good'. The contribution and
role of nonprofits were so hidden from history, in fact, that they came
to be referred to in Canada as the 'invisible sector'. The
Nonprofit Sector in Interesting Times is part of a growing body of
academic, as well as community-based, research aimed at uncovering the
important place of this sector in Canada. Consequently, we owe a debt of
intellectual gratitude to Brock and Banting for spearheading the
"Public Policy and Third Sector Series," a collection that has
added to our empirical and analytical knowledge of the sector.
It is important to observe that there is a certain lack of
precision and some measure of confusion which surrounds the
conceptualization of nonprofit organizations. Throughout this volume, as
well as in other such works, numerous terms are deployed to identify the
sector, including nonprofit, charitable, voluntary, and third sectors.
These terms are catch-all phrases which attempt to capture that area
between the private and state sectors, rather than concepts which embody
a distinct approach to nonprofit organization. These terms can also
convey different meanings. For example, the notion of the charitable
sector suggests that nonprofit organizations have a legal status as
incorporated charities, a distinction that is not enjoyed by the
majority of not-for-profit bodies. Also, numerous institutions, like
universities and hospitals, enjoy charitable status, but given their
close relationship with the state it is questionable as to whether they
are a component of the nonprofit sector or better understood as part of
the 'broader public sector'. This speaks to the fact that the
'not-for-profit sector' remains largely a residual category
that is significantly under-theorized. There is, however, a growing
sense that a distinct grouping of institutions that are recognizably
separate from both the state and the market and worthy of independent
analysis do exist.
Brock and Banting provide an introductory chapter that is most
useful for framing many of the challenges and changes facing the
nonprofit sector in Canada today. One theme they identify arises out of
a debate between Robert Putnam, as outlined in his classic work Bowling
Alone, and Robert Reich's arguments in Future of Success. Putnam
contends that our communities and civic life are in sharp decline
because of the breakdown of our voluntary associational networks, i.e.,
fewer individuals joining nonprofit organizations. Reich, by contrast,
asserts that people are still joining together for things like
childcare, health services, and recreation but they are joining as
consumers rather than citizens. In short, the altruistic goals of
addressing 'the needs of strangers' are lost and the poor and
the needy are increasingly left to fend for themselves in an ever more
competitive world where self-interest rules. Both Putnam and Reich
identify a common problem, the erosion of community and the role that
nonprofit organizations can play in restoring social solidarity, a theme
that is addressed in subsequent chapters.
Susan Phillips in her chapter, "Voluntary Sector--Government
Relationships in Transition," examines the changing relationship
between the voluntary sector and the Canadian state in the context of
neoliberal state restructuring. These changes include the downloading of
many services to nonprofit organizations, the emergence of more
collaborative relationships between the public and nonprofit sectors,
and a renewed interest by governments of all political stripes in ideas
of "citizenship," "volunteerism," and
"self-sufficient communities." (18) According to Phillips,
several changes necessitate the reform of voluntary sector-state
relations. The first is the shift from a paternalist, dependent model of
service delivery based on traditional notions of charity towards a civil
society model characterized by a more empowering, participatory approach
that emphasizes the creation of "enabling environments." (24)
Such environments are ones where the state helps communities to help
themselves, assists with capacity building, and promotes active
citizenship, including incentives to donate and volunteer. But while the
promise is for building deeper forms of citizenship within socially
cohesive communities with strong social capital assets, the reality is
that the logic of neoliberal governance structures promotes extreme
individualism, a market-based form of consumer citizenship, and social
polarization.
Phillips argues that traditional governance structures based on
top-down bureaucratic methods of oversight are untenable within the
contemporary environment that is increasingly more "horizontal,
embedded and negotiated." (25) Also, while Phillips identifies
moves such as the federal governments's Voluntary Sector Initiative
as a step in the direction of creating a more meaningful working
partnership between the nonprofit sector and the state, overall she
remains skeptical of the outcome, given the overwhelming
counter-tendency to embed neoliberal structural forms. Phillips'
chapter gives us some of the tools in which to better understand these
developments and it is by far the most conceptually advanced and
satisfying paper in the collection.
Laura Brown and Elizabeth Troutt also offer the reader a most
interesting study regarding cooperation and the stresses associated with
the new relationships that are developing between the state and
nonprofits. Drawing upon the Manitoba experience, the authors provide a
useful set of analytical categories by which to understand this changing
association. One point that comes out clearly is that new funding
relationships between the state and nonprofit service providers are
creating significant amounts of stress within the not-for-profit sector.
They conclude that governments must act more as "system
managers" of the sector, (214) rather than viewing themselves
solely as funders seeking the biggest short-term bang for their dollars.
The funding decisions of governments and the terms and conditions they
attach to these funds greatly shape the stability and security of the
nonprofit sector. Brown and Troutt conclude that better education for
policymakers concerning the needs and realities facing the non-profit
sector, sustainable and predictable funding, negotiated reporting and
accountability requirements tailored to the capacities of the specific
non-profit could all serve to increase the vitality of the sector and
ensure effective provision of services into the future. Unfortunately,
evidence points to the creation of a new funding regime for nonprofit
human service providers based on contract financing which works to
maximize state control while minimizing nonprofit autonomy; hardly the
basis for building an independent and vibrant civil society.
Other chapters tackle issues associated with nonprofit financial
planning and restraints in an environment of fiscal uncertainty; online
charitable fundraising and the regulation of privacy; political advocacy
and the challenge of maintaining tax-exempt charitable status; and the
shifting role of nonprofits in public policymaking. The papers collected
in this book approach their subject matter from various perspectives.
The more valuable contributions, like Phillips' chapter, bring more
theoretically enriched and critical analysis to their subjects. This is
especially important if we are to fully comprehend the reality versus
the rhetoric of nonprofit sector restructuring that is taking place
under the inclusive title of 'building partnerships'. Overall,
this volume is essential reading for those interested in understanding
the expanding place that the nonprofit sector is playing in our rapidly
changing society.
John Shields
Ryerson University