Colm Toibin, The Master.
Taylor, Andrew
Colm Toibin, The Master. London: Picador, 2004. 359 pages. GBP 15.99.
Ventriloquizing the past is not necessarily a profitable activity
for a writer, as Henry James recognized. Tolstoy's War and Peace,
with its mixture of historical figures and invented ones, its detailed
recreation of military campaigns interspersed with fictionalized
romance, famously earned him scorn for its artistic profligacy:
'what do such large loose baggy monsters, with their queer elements
of the accidental and the arbitrary, artisticaly mean?' he asked.
Colm Toibin's novel The Master, an account of James's
successes and failures--personal and professional--in the final years of
the nineteenth century, is alive to the potential pitfalls of historical
fiction. Towards the end of the book, after earning a rebuke from his
brother William (represented by Toibin, unfairly, as possessing an
excessively provincial mind) for not writing 'a novel about the
Puritan Fathers', Henry replies: 'I view the historical novel
as tainted by a fatal cheapness' (p. 336). 'Fatal
cheapness' is what Toibin's book needs to avoid if it is not
to be censured by its own central character.
Wisely Toibin refrains from imitating James's style--so easy
to pastiche, as Max Beerbohm and Gore Vidal have shown us, but
impossible (and unnecessary) to reproduce sincerely. Instead of adopting
James's (late) stylistic preference for elaborate clauses and
extended metaphors, Toibin chooses to incorporate a narrative framework
that served James well throughout his career. The Master is told through
the perceptions and reflections of a single
character--'Henry'--but this character is grammatically
presented in the text as a third person. James was wary of the
first-person form--employing it only once in a novel (The Sacred Fount)
as a means of dramatizing its epistemological limitations. More
conducive to the combination of control and flexibility he desired was
the notion of a 'centre of consciousness' that Toibin borrows
here. His Henry achieves a characteristically Jamesian solidity,
'connected, connected intimately, with the general human exposure,
and thereby ... befooled and bewildered, anxious, restless,
fallible' (James's words), while at the same time in
possession of a critical intelligence that can reflect on this
condition.
Reflection is the dominant action of this book. From the opening
words with their Joycean cadence ('Sometimes in the night he
dreamed about the dead'), Toibin presents us with a figure whose
memories return to haunt him almost at will. The ostensible chronology
of the novel (January 1895 to October 1899), beginning with James's
disastrous attempt to forge a career as a playwright and ending with his
lease of Lamb House in Rye and the start of work on The Ambassadors, is
regularly interrupted with retrospective re-tellings of key moments from
his earlier life. The Master seeks to build a portrait of the artist by
shuttling back and forth between an episode in the narrative present to
illuminate aspects of James's past. We are freed from the
claustrophobic and paranoid world of the 1890s and its sexual politics
into several earlier important moments from James's life. The
'obscure hurt' that kept him out of the Civil War--so long a
subject of conjecture to James scholars--is here an imagined illness
promoted by his mother as a means of avoiding enlistment; a post-Civil
War pastoral idyll of a holiday with his cousin Minny Temple and Oliver
Wendell Holmes becomes a wonderfully evocative episode of sexual
anticipation and sensory acuteness. Toibin is doing more, of course,
than just offering his readers a compendium of key James moments. At its
best, The Master takes us in directions that even Leon Edel's
magisterial five-volume biography (which Toibin obviously knows well)
dared not venture; for Toibin, the empirical material of the life can be
shaped to construct a reading of James that emphasizes denial and
evasion--a turning away from passion and sympathy.
In an earlier collection of essays, Love ill a Dark Time (2001),
Toibin had addressed the relationship between James and sexuality
through a reading of his celebrated story of loss and inaction,
'The Beast in the Jungle', in which the central character,
Marcher, waits for the revelation of a secret that will give meaning to
his life. Taking issue with queer theory's appropriation of
James's writing, Toibin countered that 'It is astonishing how
James managed to withhold his homosexuality from his work' (p.29).
Only with the knowledge of James's withheld sexual identity, Toibin
argued, does the tale 'become much darker ... You realise that the
catastrophe the story led you to expect was in fact the very life that
James chose to live, or was forced to live' (p. 33). Despite his
admonitions against queer readings of James's texts, Toibin cannot
resist reading the life back into the work: the tale 'is,
ostensibly, about a man who realises that his failure to love has been a
disaster; but it is also ... about a gay man whose sexuality has left
him frozen in the world' (p. 34). Despite itself, such a bleak view
is not quite what Toibin presents us with in Tile Master. Instead
James's withdrawal in this book from emotional ties--and especially
sexual ones--suggests that he is less a man frozen in the world,
impervious to the workings of the heart, than a figure all too aware of
the risks and longings connected to his desire for men.
Toibin's preference in Love in a Dark Time is for the more
emotionally honest homosexual writer--Oscar Wilde and Roger Casement both receive incisive, sympathetic accounts enhanced by their respective
tragic fates. James, a contemporary of both men (and less than keen on
Wilde's very public persona), chose another path. Whereas Marcher
is unaware of his evasions until the end of 'The Beast in the
Jungle', in The Master it is precisely his own evasions and
silences that James uses as material for his writing. The recollections
of a vibrant Minny Temple and, as Toibin has it, James's refusal to
reciprocate her feelings of romantic attachment before her early death,
had already become the germ for Isabel Archer in Tile Portrait of a
Lady. In the present of Toibin's novel she is soon to be
reincarnated even more powerfully as Milly Theale in The Wings of the
Dove. Memory of moral failure, as The Master wishes us to see it, is
nevertheless transformed into art. And what kind of failure is it when
the complexities of one's life are recognized, acknowledged, or
even lamented for their absence? Toibin's sexual politics are more
comfortable with a figure like Casement. 'I admire the quality of
his desire, his passion, his erotic complexity, his openness, his
doubleness, his sexual energy' (p.105), he has written. There is a
curious combination in this sentence of the explicit and the opaque, the
direct and the veiled, as if Casement's greatness lies in a sexual
openness that nevertheless requires concealment. Toibin's James is
careful to avoid an explicit sexual identity, even one privately taken.
Two young men, an Irish manservant Tom Hammond and the
Norwegian-American sculptor Hendrik Andersen, attract James's
attention, but nothing overt takes place, beyond some oblique gazing and
careful hugging. There is a beautifully understated episode in the novel
where a young James shares a bed with his friend Wendell Holmes. Holmes
'turned and cupped him with his body and placed one hand against
his back and the other on his shoulder'. James 'knew not to
turn or move, but subtly ... eased himself more comfortably into the
shape of Holmes, closing his eyes and allowing his breath to come as
freely as it would' (p. 100). Toibin's source for this episode
is Sheldon Novick's 1996 biography of James, which proposed a
sexual relationship between James and Holmes (a claim based, dubiously,
on a rather unimaginative reading of the word 'obelisk' in
their correspondence). Where Novick asserted, Toibin gestures, and the
result is very Jamesian indeed.
Despite these moments of delicate sensitivity, however, The Master
builds a picture of an artist figure plagued by a resolute inability to
commit to anything except his art, where what gets sacrificed in the
process is the possibility of intimacy. This is a very modern criticism
superimposed onto James's imagined sexual politics, one that does
not take into full account the trauma of the Wilde trial on
constructions of male homosociality or indeed the possibility of an
entirely different James, one for whom fulfilment could be achieved
without the requirements of passion. Toibin is sympathetic to James up
to a point, but James's refusal to acknowledge his sexuality or to
act upon it (Wilde is the obvious anti-type here) finally turns him into
a melancholic figure. The closing paragraph of the novel has him walking
alone through the rooms at Lamb House, so that its previous occupants
and visitors 'could be remembered and captured and held' (p.
359). Edith Wharton called James an 'ever-bubbling fountain of
fun' who was 'the delight of his intimates'. For
Toibin's James, intimacy is necessarily dispersed but its traces
are made available for conversion into art. Despite the rewards of this
process, The Master finally finds such an exchange unfulfilling.
ANDREW TAYLOR