Assemble-disassemble cell material flow management.
Cotet, Costel Emil ; Popa, Cicerone Laurentiu ; Chiscop, Florina 等
Abstract: We propose here an optimizing algorithm available for
diffused assemble disassemble systems illustrated by a case study. This
optimizing algorithm is meant to improve the productivity rates of the
assembly disassemble process. We perform this optimization using Witness
software by analyzing the results of the material flow simulation and
identifying the points where the entire flow is strangled generating
blockage at the work points of the system. We propose a solution for
this problem elimination, and we perform a second simulation to validate
that solution. The productivity improvement is significant, validating
our algorithm
Key words: assembly, disassembly, productivity, simulation
1. INTRODUCTION
We will first present here an overview description of the
manufacturing system under study (the fixing devices assemble and
disassemble flexible cell), some major techniques used in flexible cells
model building and then focusing on its operational flow. We then
describe the construction, verification, and validation of the
simulation models. In conclusion, we present the results obtained from
statistical analyses of model output, the use of these results in
identifying the material flow concentrator, and the new indicated cell
design directed to increase production rates (Cotet, 2003).
We had applied our algorithm on diffused manufacturing systems
where are several work points of the same importance in the system.
Discrete material flow management optimization, the use of search
methods to find input parameter settings that improve selected output
measures of a simulated system, has developed steadily in recent years
(Dhouib & al., 2009). These developments would probably not have
taken place without the application of heuristic search algorithms, such
as genetic algorithms. Although they lack desirable convergence
properties, heuristic search algorithms have provided good, reasonably
fast, results on a wide variety of problems. Breadth and speed are
critical (Wang & Ingham, 2008). Even though a number of provably
such convergent algorithms have been developed, they may work well on
only a subset of problems as one can see on our case study (Cotet &
Dragoi, 2008).
2. SYSTEM OVERVIEW
In order to test these optimization techniques our faculty had
initiated a research partnership with industrial partners, analyzing
several case studies on machine tool integrated production flow designed
and realized in Romania, and we had been asked to make some changes in
flexible cells architectures in order to better adapt those systems at
the manufactured parts categories (Gill, 2008).
We had tested those techniques permitting us to improve the system
architecture, based on the simulations performed in the PREMINV
laboratories of the faculty.
The lab provides a discrete material flow simulation for the parts
that are machined in manufacturing systems.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
In order to improve the process, one can perform a discrete event
simulation using WITNESS that provided a realistic model of the
manufacturing process in the machine tool field and allowed to quickly
and inexpensively evaluate a wide range of alternatives. In this paper
we present a case study on a cell used to assemble and disassemble
fixing devices (figure 1).
3. OPTIMIZING THE CELL
The simulations of the manufacturing processes, tools & parts
circulation are giving us the possibility to identify the critical point
in the material flow for a specific product gamma manufactured in the
system. Based on those simulations we are using the diagnosis reports to
make the necessary corrections in order to eliminate the flow
concentrator by adjusting the system architecture.
In order to make the necessary correspondence between the elements
of the assemble-disassemble industrial flexible cell and our Witness
conceptual model we had used a table (table 1). In this table the
transport modules (1 to 7) are assimilated to conveyors.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
We propose here a comparative analysis illustrating the
productivity improvement using material flow simulation for an
industrial case study for a specific assemble disassemble cell. First we
present the initial model of the cell (figure 2), the material flow
simulation results and our conclusions on the flow concentrator based on
those simulations. After identifying the flow concentrator we will focus
on our system architecture modifications necessary in order to improve
this critical point flow transit without generate another concentrator
in the flow. In the last part of the paper we will perform a new
simulation of a manufacturing cycle on our modified system in order to
validate this solution and we will quantify the productivity
improvement.
The results of this first simulation for a time of 7 weeks, 3 days,
17 hours, 42 minutes show that a number of 2500 parts were processed
after 7 weeks, 3 days, 17 hours, 42 minutes.
Analyzing all the reports we have made the presumption that the
transport module tr05 can be identified as the material flow
concentrator. In order to validate this presumption we had studied the
report for this transport module.
As we can see studying the reports for all the work points in the
system as well as for the transport module tr05 who is working only 19%
of the entire time this point has the worst report an represents the
flow concentrator.
Following the optimization techniques presented before the solution
proposed by us for a better management of this flow is to double the
capacity of the tr05. In the conceptual model the meaning of this
solution was the adding of an extra conveyor tr07 with the same
characteristics as tr05 (figure 3).
For this new model if we perform a simulation for the same time of
7 weeks, 3 days, 17 hours, 42 minutes, and with the same characteristics
of the work points the two transport modules tr05 and tr07 these points
will be working 67% and 62% of the time and the productivity will
increase from 2500 to 4100 parts processed (figure 4).
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
4. CONCLUSION
We had applied in this paper a set of simulation techniques used to
optimize the assemble disassemble architectures by improving the
discrete material flow management. We had analyzed the results of the
material flow simulation and we had identified the flow concentrator.
We had proposed an architecture modification as a solution for this
problem. We had performed a second simulation to validate that solution
and we had obtained an increased productivity.
5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by CNCSIS-UEFISCSU, project number PN-II RU
233/2010, project title: "Assembly/Disassembly Process
Modeling", project type: "Research projects for stimulation of
the founding/forming of young independent research teams".
6. REFERENCES
Cotet. C.E, (2003)--Optimizing concentrate and diffused FMS systems
architecture by material flow simulation techniques, The 14th
INTERNATIONAL DAAAM SYMPOSIUM, "Intelligent Manufacturing &
Automation: Focus on Reconstruction and Development", 22-25th
October 2003, pag. 103-104, ISBN 3-901509-34-8, ISSN 1726-9679
Cotet C. E., Dragoi G., Abaza B.F., (2008)--Groundhog day versus
butterfly effect revisited in discrete material flow management, in the
Annals of DAAAM for 2007 & Proceedings of the 19th INTERNATIONAL
DAAAM SYMPOSIUM "Intelligent Manufacturing & Automation: Focus
on Next Generation of Intelligent Systems and Solutions", 22-25th
October 2008, Tamava, Slovacia, pp. 0315-0316, ISSN 1726-9679, ISBN
3-901509-58-5, published by DAAAM International Vienna, Austria, edited
by Branko Katalinic, 2008
Dhouib, K., Gharbi, A. & Ayed, S. (2009). Simulation based
throughput assessment of non-homogeneous transfer lines, In:
International Journal of Simulation Modelling IJSIMM, Volume 8, no. 1,
March 2009, pp.5-15, ISSN 1726-4529, Vienna
Gill, A. (2008). Identifying potential bottlenecks through activity
under-utilization cost, In: International Journal of Simulation
Modelling IJSIMM, Volume 7, no. 4, December 2008, pp.165-175, ISSN
1726-4529, Vienna
Wang, Q., Ingham, N. (2008). A discrete event modelling approach
for supply chain simulation, In: International Journal of Simulation
Modelling IJSIMM, Volume 7, no. 3, September 2008, pp.124-134, ISSN
1726-4529, Vienna
Tab l. Real and modeled elements correspondence
Flexible cell Witness model
Transport module 1 tr01
Transport module 2 tr02
Transport module 3 tr03
Transport module 4 tr04
Transport module 5 tr05
Assemble point asambl
Part loading point mcarc
control control
Disassemble point dezasmb
Part unloading point descarc
Washing point spalare
Transport module 7 tr07