Modeling and experimental study of tangential cutting force in dry turning of Ti-6Al-4V alloy.
Upadhyay, Vikas ; Jain, Pramod Kumar ; Mehta, Narinder Kumar 等
Abstract: In the present work, an attempt has been made to
investigate the effect of cutting parameters on the tangential cutting
force in dry turning of Ti-6Al-4V alloy and to subsequently develop a
predictive regression model. The experiments were conducted as per
design matrix of Face centered cube design with three replications of
centre point. Tangential cutting force decreases with increase in
cutting speed from 50 m/min to 90m/min but increases with increase in
cutting speed from 90 to 130 m/min due to rapid wear of tool material.
Key words: tangential cutting force, dry turning, regression model,
titanium alloy
1. INTRODUCTION
Ti-6Al-4V alloy finds wide application in modern manufacturing due
to its exceptional corrosion resistance and high strength to weight
ratio which is maintained even at elevated temperatures (Ezugwu &
Wang, 1997). However developments in the application of Ti-6Al-4V have
not kept pace with other materials due to its high initial cost and
difficulty in machining. Its low thermal conductivity leads to high
temperature generation at the chip tool interface and strong alloying
tendency at prevailing cutting temperature results in welding, galling
and smearing along with rapid destruction of the cutting tool resulting
in short tool life (Donachie, 2000). Machining of this alloy produces
very thin chips. As a consequence small tool-chip interface area causes
high stresses and temperature on the tip of the tool (Machado &
Wallbank, 1990). Apart from these problems, shear strain in the chip is
not uniform; rather, it is confined in a narrow band between the
segments resulting in serrated chips and often causes serious vibrations
which limit the material removal rate and affect the tool life
(Komanduri & Turkovich, 1981, Hua & Shivpuri, 2004).
Cutting force is one of the important parameter to describe the
machinability of a material and power requirement in machining. Hong et
al (2001) reported that tangential cutting force ([F.sub.z]) decreases
with increase in cutting speed from 60m/min to 250 m/min under dry and
cryogenic cutting. Ezugwu et al. (2005) studied cutting forces under
conventional coolant supply and argon enriched environment. They
reported that tangential cutting force decreases with increase in
cutting speed upto 120 m/min and then increases at speed of 130 m/min
under conventional coolant supply, whereas tangential cutting force
increases with the cutting speed beyond 110 m/min under argon enriched
environment. Sun et al. (2009) reported that tangential cutting force in
dry turning increases with cutting speed up to 21 m/min and then
decreases from 21 to 57 m/min. Tangential cutting force increases by 10
N when cutting speed is increased from 57 to 75 m/min, then remains
constant as the speed is increased from 75 to 113 m/min and finally
decreases beyond 113 m/min. From their study, it can be concluded that
there is no critical speed in case of dry turning below which tool
material manintains it hardness and above which tool softening occurs as
observed by Ezugwu et al. (2005) with conventional coolant supply and
argon enriched environment. However under identical cutting conditions,
more heat will remain at the tool tip in dry turning as compared to wet
and hence, there is more chances of tool softening. So, it requires
further study of the tangential cutting force in dry turning of this
alloy to determine the occurrence of tool softening. In the present
study, dry turning of Ti-6Al-4V alloy is carried out to determine the
variation of tangential cutting force with cutting speed and to
investigate the presence of critical cutting speed.
2. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY
2.1 Experimental procedure
The experimental study is conducted on Ti-6Al-4V alloy under dry
cutting condition. Rigid, high power precision lathe (model: NH22; Make:
HMT, India) equipped with specially designed experimental set-up is used
for experimental work. Work-piece is held between three jaw chuck and
revolving centre for increasing the rigidity of machining system. DCLNR
2525 M12 tool holder is used to hold the CNMG 120408 tool bit of
cemented carbide (ISO S-grade). The tool angles are as follows: back
rake angle = -6[degrees], side rake angle = -6[degrees], principal
cutting edge angle = 95[degrees], end cutting edge angle = 5[degrees],
nose radius = 0.8 mm. The tangential cutting force was measured using
Kistler[R] piezoelectric dynamometer (model 9257B). The charge generated
at the dynamometer was amplified using charge amplifier (Kistler
multichannel charge amplifier Type 5070). The amplified signal was
acquired and stored in computer using Dyno Ware software for further
analysis. Machining operations were carried out at various cutting
parameters as shown in Table 1. Fresh cutting edge is used in each
experimental run to mitigate the effect of tool wear.
2.2 Experimental Design
Experiments were designed according to the face centered central
composite design or face-centered cube (FCC) of Response Surface
Methodology (RSM). Experimental design involves variation of three
factors (cutting speed, feed rate and depth of cut) at three levels as
mentioned in Tab. 1. This requires a total of 17 experimental runs
including three replications of centre point. The face centered cube
does not require as many centre points as in spherical central composite
design as two or three centre points are sufficient to provide good
variance of prediction in experimental region (Montgomery, 2007). Tab.
2. shows the parametric combination for various run of experiments.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
The regression model for the tangential cutting force is developed
with the help of Design-Expert 6.0.8 software. Regression model in terms
of actual value is described by equation (1)
[F.sub.z] = -74.82028-4.52764*A+3677.39387*B+25.7*C
+0.024292*[A.sup.2]-9145.04717*[B.sup.2]+1437.5*B*C (1)
The various [R.sup.2] statistics of the developed regression model
are given in Tab. 3. The [R.sup.2] value of model is 0.9954 which
indicates that the model can explain 99.54 % of total variations. 0.9926
value of Adjusted [R.sup.2] indicates that the 99.26% of the total
variability can be explained by the model after considering the
significant factors. Predicted [R.sup.2] of 0.9859 is in good agreement
with the Adjusted [R.sup.2] of 0.9926 and indicates that the model can
explain 98.59% of total variability in new data.
Variation of tangential cutting force with feed rate, depth of cut
and cutting speed is shown in Fig. 1. It is evident that tangential
cutting force increases with increase in depth of cut and feed rate due
to increased amount of material to be removed from the material.
Increase in cutting speed from 50 m/min to 90 m/min results in decrease
of magnitude of tangential cutting force. It happens due to decrease in
heat dissipation time at high cutting speed leading to rise in
temperature at tool work piece interface resulting in drop of shear
strength in flow zone of work piece material. Further increase in
cutting speed to 130 m/min results in increase in magnitude of cutting
force component. This may be attributed to rapid increase in cutting
temperature at tool chip interface which results in softening/rapid wear
of tool material.
The tool used in experimental work has same cutting edge angles and
rake angles as used by Ezugwu et al. (2005) but different nose radius.
However the cutting geometry used by Sun et al. (2009) is different from
present work and thus might have lead to less heat generation at the
tool tip. So, further investigations are required to study the effect of
tool geometry on cutting force.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
4. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE SCOPE
Based on the experimental data obtained it can be concluded that
tangential cutting force is affected the most by the depth of cut.
Further, there is a critical speed below which the tangential cutting
force decreases with the increase of speed due to softening of workpiece material. However, at cutting speeds beyond the critical value the
tangential cutting force begins to increase, thereby indicating the
onset of condition in which heat concentration at the tool tip
predominates over workpiece softening due to poor thermal conductivity
of workpiece material resulting in rapid tool wear. Detailed
investigation of this phenomenon covering a wide range of variables
including tool geometry is necessary for developing a better
understanding of the machinability of Ti-6Al-4V alloy.
5. REFERENCES
Donachie, M. J. Jr. (2000). Titanium: A Technical Guide, second
edition, ASM International, USA.
Ezugwu, E. O. & Wang, Z. M. (1997). Titanium alloys and their
machinability--a review. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 68,
pp. 262-274
Ezugwu, E.O.; Da Silva, R. B.; Bonney J. & Machado A.R. (2005).
The effect of argon enriched environment in high speed machining of
titanium alloy, Tribology Transactions, 48, pp. 18-23
Hong, S.Y.; Ding Y. & Jeong, Woo-cheol (2001). Friction and
cutting forces in cryogenic machining of Ti-6Al-4V. Int. J. of Machine
Tool and Manufacture, 41, pp. 2271-2285
Hua, J. & Shivpuri, R. (2004). Prediction of chip morphology
and segmentation during the machining of Titanium alloys. Journal of
Materials Processing Technology, 150, pp.124-133
Komanduri, R. & Turkovich, B.F.V. (1981). New observations on
the mechanism of Chip formation when machining Titanium alloys, Wear,
69, pp. 179-188
Machado, A. R. & Wallbarlk, J. (1990). Machining of titanium
and its alloys-a review, Proc. IMechE Part B: Journal of Engineering
Manufacture, 204, pp. 53-60
Montgomery, D.C. (2007). Design and Analysis of Experiments, fifth
edition, Wiley, India
Sun, S.; Brandt, M. & Dargusch, M.S. (2009). Characteristics of
cutting forces and chip formation in machining of titanium alloys. Int.
J. of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 49, pp. 561-568
Tab. 1. Level of independent variables for turning
Variable Unit Level
1 2 3
Cutting Speed (A) m/min 50 90 130
Feed rate (B) mm/rev 0.16 0.20 0.24
Depth of cut (C) nun 0.5 0.75 1
Tab. 2. Face centered cube design along with the parameter
values for different run
Std. Type Cutting Feed rate Depth of Cutting
Order Speed (mm/rev) cut (mm) Force (N)
(m/min)
1 Fact -1(50) -1(0.16) -1(0.50) 241
2 Fact 1(130) -1(0.16) -1 (0.50) 231
3 Fact -1(50) 1(0.24) -1(0.50) 303
4 Fact 1(130) 1(0.24) -1 (0.50) 291
5 Fact -1(50) -1(0.16) 1(1.00) 364
6 Fact 1(130) -1(0.16) 1(1.00) 361
7 Fact -1(50) 1(0.24) 1(1.00) 494
8 Fact 1(130) 1(0.24) 1(1.00) 468
9 Axial -1(50) 0(0.20) 0(0.75) 360
10 Axial 1(130) 0(0.20) 0(0.75) 349
11 Axial 0(90) -1(0.16) 0(0.75) 261
12 Axial 0(90) 1(0.24) 0(0.75) 341
13 Axial 0(90) 0(0.20) -1(0.50) 244
14 Axial 0(90) 0(0.20) 1(1.00) 406
15 Center 0(90) 0(0.20) 0(0.75) 316
16 Center 0(90) 0(0.20) 0(0.75) 324
17 Center 0(90) 0(0.20) 0(0.75) 312
Tab. 3. Various R squared statistics
R-Squared 0.9954
Adj R-Squared 0.9926
Pred R-Squared 0.9859