The aspects about economic analysis and measure for restructure a company.
Tent, Ionut Dacian ; Dumitrescu, Constantin Dan ; Dumitrescu, Eugenia Cintia Ivonne 等
Abstract: This paper aims to analyze the cost 1000 RON turnover in
order to determine the possibility of restructuring the company. After
analysis by the research work was developed a case study on the
possibility of restructuring and modalities used for this operation,
method used for this operation
Key words: financial analysis, annual turnover, forecasts
1. INTRODUCTION
In a general acceptance the cost is on resource expression in
monetary consumption of achieving the company, or a methodological
perspective, the cost can be treated as a grouping or regrouping,
according to certain criteria, expenditure, combinations are so many as
a construction game. So the cost is the total consumption of resources
that made the company to achieve a unit of product or service.
2. EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS BASED ON TURNOVER
For restructure the production system are based on the analysis of
turnover variation and expenses resulting from the manufacturing cycle
of the company's products.
For analysis using data from account profit and loss of society in
Table 1 :
Tab. 1. Efficiency of expenditure afferent turnover in 2009-
2010
Nr. Indicatoros 2009 2010 Deviation Indices
([DELTA]) (%)
1 A 5343702 3841159 -1502543 71,88
2 B 4077847 2346984 -1730863 57,55
3 C -- 3629244 -- --
4 D 2863394 -- --
5 E 763,11 611 -152,11 80,1
A--Turnover ([summation][q.sub.i] x [p.sub.i])
B--Expenditure afferent of turnover
([summation][q.sub.i] x [c.sub.i])
C--Recalculated turnover
([summation][q.sub.i1] x [p.sub.i0])
D--Expenditure to 1000 RON turnover
E--Expenditure afferent of recalculated turnover ([summation][q.sub.i1]
x [c.sub.i0]).
In Figure 1. I represent account indicators for profit and loss.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
3. THE CALCULATION MODEL OF THE INDICATOR, EXPENDITURE AT 1000 RON
TURNOVER
[C.sup.(1000)] = ([summation] [Ch.sub.i] / [summation] CA) * 1000 =
([summation] [q.sub.i] x [c.sub.i] / [summation] [q.sub.i] x [p.sub.i])
x 1000
Where: Chi = Expenditure at each levelcategories of activity
"i"; CA = turnover; qi = quantity; ci = the unit price at
product "i"; pi = The average selling price (excluding T.V.A).
a) Total change in the indicator ([DELTA] [C.sup.(1000)]):
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]
b) Decomposition of the factors of influence:
A [C.sup.(1000)] = [DELTA] [g.sub.i] + [DELTA] [p.sub.i] + [DELTA]
[c.sub.i]
c) Establishing the influence of each factor with changes on the
indicator:
1. Influence change in the structure of turnover:
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]
2. Influence change in average selling prices:
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]
3. Influence change in unit production costs
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
Expenditure to 1000 RON turnover fell by 152.11 [per thousand],
from 763.11 [per thousand] to 611 [per thousand], favorable situation
for the company analyzed, the efficiency related of turnover expenses
increased, which means that the growth rate of turnover business
[(3841159/5343702 x 100] = 71.88%) ahead of spending growth
[(3793848/5959413) x 100] = 63.66 [per thousand]
4. FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EVOLUTION OF INDICATORORS (COSTS AT 1000
RON TURNOVER)
Evolution of indicators, expenditure at 1,000 RON turnovers takes
place in the structure of turnover, the average selling price and unit
cost of products. Structure of turnover worsens with increasing the rate
of 25.87 [per thousand], average selling prices increased and a
favorable effect on lowering its rate to 43.53 [per thousand], the unit
cost is reduced and lowers costs 1,000 RON figure business to 134.45
[per thousand], favorable aspect for society, which compensates for the
adverse outcome due to worsening of the structure turnover.
Modification costs 1,000 RON turnover is the consequence of the
following factors, namely: material expenses (from 12.02 [per thousand]
to 13.84 [per thousand]), energy costs and water (from 14.04 [per
thousand] to 14.14 [per thousand]) cost of goods (from 205[per thousand]
to 325.19 [per thousand]), staff costs (from 123.75[per thousand] to
159.25 [per thousand]), adjustment costs of current assets (from 0 [per
thousand] to 2.45 [per thousand]) and fixed tangible and intangible
assets (from 2.99 [per thousand] to 6.66 [per thousand]), which rose a
total of 163.72 [per thousand], which offset the decrease of 291.24 [per
thousand], both raw materials and consumables (from 540.82[per thousand]
to 346.44 [per thousand]) and the decrease in other operating expenses
(from 216.59[per thousand] to 119.73 [per thousand]) (Fig. 3).
A*--material expenses
B*--energy costs and water
C*--cost of goods
D*--staff costs
E*--adjustment costs of current assets
F*--which offset the decrease of
G*--decrease expenditure raw materials and consumables
Reducing costs of raw materials and direct materials is achieved by
reducing material consumption per unit of product and their purchase
price.
In terms of content these items of expenditure are differentiated
on the industries in relation to a number of factors that generate
production costs and in particular on the particular production
technology and organization of industry.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
5. CONCLUSION
Ideal for developing a company is when the cost per thousand RON
turnover to decline, and efficient expenditure increased turnover, which
means that the growth rate of turnover ahead of the growth rate of
expenditure.
In the study we already reported that, for example, has reversed
the relationship between costs and prices. Unlike this type of
relationship, the market economy becomes the dominant indirect
relationship between cost and price. Influences the cost price on the
market made through the offer price included the cost of the product.
Instead, the market price becomes an indirect role on costs forcing
manufacturers to cut costs to increase profits. Direct competition
between producers and competition generates indirect costs, earning more
than those producers whose costs are lower.
6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This work was partially supported by the strategic grant
POSDRU/88/1.5/S/50783, Project ID50783 (2009), co-financed by the
European Social Fund--Investing in People, within the Sectoral
Operational Programme Human Resources
7. REFERENCES
Bailesteanu G., Diagnosis, risk and economic efficiency in
business, Publishing, Mirton, 1998
Dumitrescu C.D.s.a, The general management elements, Publishing,
Timisoara, 1998
Petrescu S., s.a, Finance economic analyse, Publishing, Iasi, 2002
Tamasila M., Performance analyze and the company diagnosis,
Publishing Solness, Tirnisoara, 2008
Valceanu G., Robu V., Georgescu N., Finance economic analyse,
Publishing, Economica, Bucuresti, 2005