Development of a film-insert molding process for an automotive part.
Park, Hong Seok ; Dang, Xuan-Phuong
1. INTRODUCTION
Front radiator grill is one of the important components in an
automobile, in terms not only technical aspect, but also aesthetic
appearance. It is usually made by plastic injection moulding followed by
a chrome plating process for decorating. This traditional manufacturing
process is becoming high cost and harmful to the environment, nowadays
(Sherman, 2004). The use of bright film laminated to an ABS substrate
allows automotive makers to produce chrome-like plastic parts without
the need for post-moulding and chrome plating. The new manufacturing
technique that can replace the traditional moulding and decorating
plastic part is film-insert moulding (FIM). In literature, the studies
on film insert moulding techniques mainly focus on film thickness
distribution after forming (Kim et al., 2009), thermoviscoelastic
behaviour of film-insert moulded parts (Kim et al., 2008) and
interfacial characteristics of film insert (Leong et al., 2006).
Although laminate insert moulding and FIM for manufacturing automotive
panel instrument have been being studied and applied, some practical
problems still exist in particular circumstances. Our study develops a
manufacturing process for making a chrome-like radiator grill by
applying film-insert moulding technique. New advanced technology and
automation as well as practical solutions that reduce the defects due to
the complication of inserted films have been utilized effectively.
2. THE APPLICATION OF FILM-INSERT MOLDING FOR MANUFACTURING A
CHROMELIKE RADIATOR GRILL
FIM, a form of in-mould decoration, has moved on quickly since its
introduction several years ago. New developments in material technology
and the wider acceptance of technology by both designers and
manufacturers have helped FIM to expand rapidly. FIM was originally
developed as an innovative method of plastic product decoration
replacing for lengthy and costly traditional post-mould techniques.
Figure 1 shows a comparison between a traditional manufacturing process
with coating and a FIM technology. It can be seen that the traditional
process prolongs the cycle time and consists of some environmentally
harmful stages. On the contrary, FIM shortens the manufacturing process
and avoids the plating and painting processes that cause air and water
pollution. FIM involves four steps: film making, forming, trimming and
moulding. Generally, the film in the form of sheet coil is made and
supported by a professional manufacture. The sheet is then transferred
to a vacuum and thermoforming press where it is formed to the exact
shape that the outer side of film becomes the outer side of the finished
component. After being formed, these 3D films must be cut out of the
waste or undesired material in order to create individual components
with desired size. Finally, they are inserted in a female mould cavity,
where the molten polymer is injected behind the films. The bonding
between the two materials creates a solid and final decorated part that
is ready for use.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
Nowadays, FIM technique has been widely used in automotive industry (Sherman, 2004; Zollner, 2007; Kim et al., 2008) for decorating interior
and exterior automotive parts such as fascia, IP bezel, bumper, roof
strip, instrument panel, and rocker panel by some of the leading
automakers such as Crysler, Ford, GM, Honda, Mercedes, Volkswagen and
Volvo. The radiator grill made by FIM (Fig. 2) was first introduced in
the model Verna at the end of the year 2008 by Hyundai Motor.
Previously, the grille was chrome plated followed by painting. FIM
technology with bright film is replacing two processes with one green
manufacturing process. The selected inserted film is a Fluorex[R] bright
film; it passes all material requirements such as UV resistance, scratch
resistance and cleanability with high pressure power washing equipment.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
The manufacturing processes mainly perform automatically from film
forming, film trimming, handling and moulding (see Fig. 3). The radiator
grill was produced at Hanguk Mold (Korea) company by the development and
cooperation with Hyundai Motor, ECOPLASTIC and University of Ulsan.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
3. CHALLENGES AND DEVELOPMENT OF SOLUTIONS FOR REDUCING THE DEFECTS
One of the most important considerations when using FIM technology
is how the films position and hold in place in the mould cavity during
injection moulding process. The worker assembles six inserted films to
the robot's arm tool. Subsequently, the robot holds the films with
suction by vacuum, moves to the female mould cavity, places the films in
desired positions and releases the vacuum. Resin is injected to the
backside of inserted film. The momentum of the resin flow tends to push
the inserted film move out of desired location, so it is necessary to
prevent this displacement in order to avoid overlap and dislocation
phenomena (see Fig. 4). Variables that influence these defects are the
number of gating points, the rate of volumetric flow for each injection
point and the design of the injection points. Poor injection control
results in inserted film distortion or dislocation. To avoid undesired
displacement of the inserted films, the initial injection speed and
injection rate should be low (Osswald, 2008). This leads to a
prolongation of filling time, and short shot can occur due to a higher
viscosity.
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
At the beginning, eight gates were designed at the both sides (left
and right) of the grill for reducing the initial injection speed and
injection rate at each gate as well as momentum of the resin flow in
order to avoid undesired displacement of the inserted film. All the
attempts were made including changing the process parameters, adjusting
and checking electrostatic state; however, the defective rate caused by
overlap phenomena was up to around 20%. New improvement was done by
changing the films holding method by electrostatic to adaptive retention
pins mechanism as shown in Fig. 5. When the mould closes, the pin pushes
the inserted film against the mold cavity's surface securely by
spring force. After the resin reaches the pins' tip, they finish
their function and retract for avoiding imprinted holes on the product.
This retention mechanism allows the injection speed to increase as a
usual injection moulding method. Also, multi-gate was replaced by sing
gate located at the center of the molded part in order to avoid
undesired weld lines at the middle of the product.
4. RESULTS
After applying the new retention mechanism using pins and springs,
the defect rate caused by overlap significantly reduced from 20% to 3%.
This defect rate is acceptable in practical injection moulding. The hot
runner and single gate at the center save material and avoid the
undesired weld lines, respectively. Holding the film with electrostatic
was altered by holding with the mechanical retention system. This change
allows the increment of injection pressure and injection rate.
Consequently, filling time or cycle time is reduced, and it is not
necessary to use any special molding process. Moreover, the quality of
the molded part is also improved. The manufacturing cost per product
reduces 7.8% compared to the traditional process. The benefit of FIM
technique for manufacturing the grill is more than that if the
environmental cost is included. This innovative technology was
recognized as a finalist in SPE Automotive Division Innovation Awards
Program.
5. CONCLUSIONS
FIM is a relative new moulding technique that reduces the
manufacturing cost, shortens the manufacturing time and helps to protect
the environment in comparison to traditional decoration method.
Chrome-plated film insert molding was applied successfully for
manufacturing the automotive radiator grill. Other exterior parts in
automotive industry will be the further object for applying FIM
technology. The successful application of FIM for manufacturing of the
automotive radiator grill contributes to reduce the manufacturing cost
and indirectly to make the car to be friendly to the environment.
6. REFERENCES
Kim, G.; Kee, K & Kang, S (2009). Prediction of the film
thickness distribution and pattern change during film insert
thermoforming. Polymer Engineering & Science, vol. 49, pp.
2195-2203, 2009
Sherman, L.M. (2004). Where the Action Is: Decorating with Formable
Films. Available: www.ptonline.com/articles
Osswald, T.A.; Turng, L.S. & Gramann, P.J. (2008). Injection
molding handbook. 2nd ed. Hanser, ISBN: 1569903182 Munich: 2008
Kim, S. Y.; Lee, S.H., Baek, S.J. & Youn, J.R. (2008).
Thermoviscoelastic Behavior of Film-Insert-Molded Parts Prepared under
Various Processing Conditions. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering,
vol. 293, pp. 969-978, 2008
Leong, Y. W; Ishiaku, U.S.; Kotaki, M. & Hamada, H. (2006).
Interfacial characteristics of film insert molded polycarbonate film/polycarbonate-acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene substrate, part 1:
Influence of substrate molecular weight and film thickness. Polymer
Engineering & Science, vol. 46, pp. 1674-1683, 2006
Zollner, O. (2007). Plastics engineering in automotive exteriors.
in Plastics in automotive engineering: exterior applications, R. Stauber
and L. Vollrath, Eds., ed Hanser, ISBN: 978-1-56990-406-0, Munich, 2007,
pp. 41-52