Experiences with education of CAE software in academic environment supported by model task.
Taraba, Bohumil ; Hajdu, Stefan
1. INTRODUCTION
Technological progress is an attribute of the current era. Powerful
digital computers and sophisticated software allow enter actively into
the engineering knowledge process and creative activity. On the market
there are for a long time established standardized commercial software
which are an integral component for scientific and design development
teams. Application of software engineering requires nearly full usage of
knowledge acquired during the theoretical study at the university. In a
variety of software it is possible to study directly the proposed
solution and experiments.
The learning of students to work with CAE software aims to develop
the creativity of thought and obtained knowledge to implant in new
solutions and experiments preparing. Teacher's personality should
meet three requirements: 1) sufficient knowledge of engineering
theoretical bases, 2) extensive practical experience of working with CAE
software, 3) methodical bases of teaching and experiences of work with
students at the university (Kovacova et al., 2009). The result of the
educational process are educated young people in the field of
engineering application software type CATIA, SYSWELD, SolidWorks,
ABAQUS, WHITNES, ANSYS etc., who are asked for practice. In that case
answer the question of what to teach is not so difficult. Complicated,
much more difficult is to answer the question of how to teach CAE
software (Felder et al., 2000).
2. TEACHING METHODS
The content of the paper is focused on the experiences that were
obtained the use of chosen CAE system ANSYS. With the success ANSYS is
used in teaching subjects such as the modelling and simulation of
technological processes. This paper presents three alternative methods
that are suitable to use in the academic environment, classified by
article authors.
2.1 Application-reproductive method (ARM)
Teaching unit (exercise) is managed and moderated by teacher. The
teaching unit (exercise) is managed and moderated by teacher. Teacher
creates a simulation model step by step with the help of computer and
data-projector (application process). Reproduce this creation process,
students assign commands into personal computer (reproductive process).
Simulation model processing requires geometric and material model, loads
and boundary conditions, type of solving procedure and interpretation of
obtained results. Experience are: teaching the process to
"start" for students with a minimum degree of knowledge of the
issues; it is possible to apply it in groups of students with a basic
level of computer literacy; it is suitable for the initial exercises and
is designed to familiarize them with the working environment of the
software.
The disadvantages are: slow progress in addressing the challenges
of modeling and unbalanced levels of the student's reaction on the
task modeling. The way of teaching with the use of
application-reproductive method in the teaching process of the above
mentioned subject is least effective procedure.
2.2 Expose method
Expose method is very effective and progressive approach to
increase student's knowledge in modelling and simulation of
technological processes. Teacher at the beginning of a teaching unit
defines a problem. The algorithm of the problem is processed so to
create conditions for an independent student work on the personal
computer. The following part of exercise belongs to student's
activity.
The teacher becomes only an observer and if any problem occurs he
remove it, or with the correct command or contribution he helps to
solution of the given task. The advantages are: high efficiency of a
teaching unit, students develop creative thinking and ability to follow
the solution by detail. The disadvantages are: teacher must have a broad
base of knowledge for the solution of the problem, he must have skills
in modelling the process and be able to respond to difficult questions
from the students.
2.3 E-Method
Internet and the baud rate are now at high level. It is a fact that
the Internet has become also a tool in teaching process (Valisova &
Kasikova, 2007). Using e-learning methods in the teaching process of
ANSYS is subject to the existence of the academic information system
(AIS) within the university. For example, it is possible nowadays from
the document server AIS to download PDF files (DOC), text files and
animation.
The focus of teaching is to prepare for the learning process all
necessary documents that are available for students at AIS: free
distributed version of ANSYS, typologically ready set of examples with
its commands attached files (ie. log files) and procedures for dealing
with examples in the form of animation. E-Method provides a separate
activity for students, because the teaching unit is expected solution of
selected tasks and their engineering context, and not to repeat the
elementary processes. Advantages: unlimited availability of information
to study the MSTP, the scope for self-learning by addressing challenges
in the form of log files and animations, and to contact the teacher via
e-consultations. Disadvantages: difficulty in preparing the files by a
team of teachers, educative software ANSYS is computationally limited,
and application of a appropriate university form of control knowledge.
3. MODEL TASK
The chosen model task aims to show the applicability of presented
methods. Fusion welding with laser beam was chosen as a typical
technological treating process of materials: laser beam with heat flow
[phi] [W] and velocity of movement w [m.[s.sup.-1]], welded material is
steel sheet with thickness b [m] and the simulation model gives
transient temperature fields.
3.1 Method ARM
After the theoretical analysis of the task and definition of the
calculated area dimensions is required the application of the method
ARM, which is based on individual steps of the solution. The sequence of
simulation model development: (Keypoints) [right arrow] contour area
(Line) [right arrow] (Area) [right arrow] selection of element (Shell57)
[right arrow] definition of the material thickness (Real constants)
[right arrow] definition of the material properties (Material models)
[right arrow] calculating the length of element [right arrow] mesh
generating (Mesh) [right arrow] initial and boundary conditions (Define
loads) [right arrow] load steps creation [right arrow] type of the
analysis (Transient) [right arrow] solving start (Solve from LS files)
[right arrow] evaluation of the results (General postprocessing) [right
arrow] temperature field contours in chosen time [right arrow]
temperature field animation. Step by step commands application is
time-consuming. As a result is little time for assessment algorithm of
task and interpretation of results.
3.2 Expose method
Assignment of task and its explanation is focused emphasis on
familiarizing students with new procedures that was not used in the
previous analysis. The new way of solution of the task is in this case
the creation of the load steps (LS). The content of load steps is data
on the time effect of the laser beam on the surface of the material. For
the modeling of the laser beam movement is needed to create an adequate
number of load steps. Load steps are created using this method through
cycles. Students solve the task singly.
3.3 E-Method
The students are prepared for application of the task without a
detailed explanation after the study of the task from the stored
document in AIS system. In the process of calculating is the space for
consultation of the problems of task. During the exercise we have more
time to calculate of multiple tasks.
3.4 Simulation of model task
The simulation model of movement of the laser beam has the
following data: [phi] = 400 W, w = 0.005 m.[s.sup.-1] and b = 0.004 m.
Material properties of steel sheet: coefficient of thermal conductivity [lambda] = 45 W.[m.sup.-1].[K.sup.-1], specific heat c = 460
J.[kg.sup.-1].[K.sup.-1] and density [rho] = 7850 kg.[m.sup.-3] (Radaj,
1999). Calculated area has dimensions 50 x 30 mm, Fig. 1.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
Generated mesh (Fig. 2) consists of shell elements with an element
length 0.0005 m. Length of element represents value of laser beam
displacement with a time step 0.1 s. To overcome the length of the
computational area with value 0.05 m was necessary to process 100 load
steps. Result of transient thermal analysis is a large amount of data
available in the output files. Figure 3 shows the calculated quasistatic
temperature field in time 9.0 s.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
The size of the computing area is appropriate for the specified
parameters of the welding. The temperature field has quasistatic
character and corresponds with examined technological process. The
maximum temperature reaches higher value than the melting temperature of
steel.
4. CONCLUSION
Modeling and simulation of technological processes is very complex
and difficult process. The solver must have good foundations of
theoretical field solution of the task and adequate computer literacy.
During the learning is the most significant aspect of the information
transfer from teacher to students. Given the complexity of the CAE
software teaching process is a recommended methodology: in the early
stages of learning should be used initially slower ARM method. After
reaching the required level of work with the software application is
applied EXPOSE method. The combination EXPOSE method and E-Method
provides high efficiency process. E-method is necessary for the
education of talented students.
The future research will be oriented into directions: the different
levels of the assigned tasks and their effect on the effectiveness of
the teaching process, choose projects from the real environment with
goal to solve non-linear tasks, to prepare textbooks, guides for the
exercise and documents for E-Learning.
5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The research was supported by grant VEGA 1/0721/08.
6. REFERENCES
Kovacova, M. & Zahonova, V. (2009). E-Learning on STU,
Bratislava, ISBN 978-80-227-3073-0
Radaj, D. (1999). Schweissprozesssimulation, Grundlagen und
Anwendungen, Verlag fur Schweissen und verwandte Verfahren, DVS-Verl.
Dusseldorf, ISBN 3-87155-188-0
Valisova, A. & Kasikova, H. (2007). Pedagogy for teachers,
Pedagogika pro ucitele. Praha, Grada, ISBN 978-80-247-1734-0
Felder R., M.; Woods D., R.; Stice, J., E.; & Rugarcia, A.
(2000). The future of engineering education. II. teaching methods work,
Chem. Engr. Education, 34(1), 26-39
*** (2010) Ansys, Theoretical Manual, Available on the Internet:
http://www.pdfqueen.com/pdf/an/ansys-10-usersmanual/10/ Accessed on:
2010-05-10