Investigation of the particular crystallization behaviour of semi- crystalline thermoplastic powders processed by selective laser sintering.
Rietzel, Dominik ; Drummer, Dietmar ; Kuehnlein, Florian 等
1. INTRODUCTION AND MOTIVATION
Products made by additive manufacturing have grown in importance,
now being much more than mere objects for demonstration. This is one of
the reasons why currently many committees, like the ASTM F42 or VDI work
intense on new standards for additive manufacturing technologies. One of
their major challenges is the reproducibility of part properties
achievable in a layer-wise manufacturing process.
Influencing parameters are the use of refreshed powders with
varriing properties, transient temperatures in the chamber due to
warm-up strategies but also effected by placement of components.
Especially the arrangement of stl-files with different volumes in the
building chamber is crucial for the overall properties. Fig. 1 shows
exemplarly a build job of shells for mobile phones above different
volumes. Due to heat transfer of the beneath placed components, the
pre-heating of surrounding powder and thus resulting accuracy to size,
cristallinity and mechanical properties will be influenced for each
shell. Currently, there are new semi-crystalline thermoplastics, e.g.
polypropylene (PP) or polyetherketone (e.g. PEEK HP-3) on the verge of
entering the market. Additionally, it could recently be shown that other
important thermoplastic materials like polyethylene (PE-HD) and
polyoxymethylene (POM) can be processed by SLS, too. (Rietzel et al.,
2010; Rietzel et al., 2008)
The investigations presented in this paper are focused on studying
the effects near phase transitions (melting and crystallization) for
different polymers in order to derive an understanding of occurring
processes as basis for direct manufacturing in the future. Especially,
melting and solidification behaviour must be known because they are of
outstanding importance for the laser sintering process. The established
model of a quasi-isotherm laser sintering process (Schmachtenberg and
Seul, 2002) is in general used as basis for the processing behaviour of
polymers. Hence the influences of time-dependent crystallization effects
are studied to enhance the existing model.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Commercially available laser sintering powders made from PA12
(PA2200, EOS GmbH) and PEK (PEEK HP-3, EOS GmbH) were tested as to their
processing properties and compared to alternative thermoplastic powders.
Cryoscopic grinding to a particle size below [d.sub.3,max] = 80 [micro]m
was done with POM granules (BASF SE), the generated powder was then
mixed with 0.2 wt.-% of Aerosil[R] (Degussa AG), in order to step up
flowability. PE-HD (DuPont, [d.sub.3,50]=24-36 [micro]m) and PP (DuPont,
[d.sub.3,50]=30-45 [micro]m) were provided as powders in spherical
geometry. By adding 0.4 wt.-% of Carbon Black[R] (Degussa AG) the
penetration depth of the laser could be limited to approximately 100
[micro]m for PE-HD, as it has poor energy absorption behaviour in the
wavelength of the C[O.sub.2]-laser.
To investigate the melting and crystallization behavior of the
thermoplastic material employed, the SLS process was simulated by DSC measurements. According to DIN 53765, 10 or 20 K/min are the standard
heating and cooling rates, for thermoplastics. By using different
cooling rates it could be shown in previous works (Rietzel et al., 2010)
that crystallization has a high time dependency and as part generation
with laser sintering is a quais-isothermal process, standard measurement
technologies are unsuited to sufficiently describe the real process.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
The basic idea of quasi-isotherm laser sintering implements the
assumption of melt which does not crystallize for a long period of time
at a point just below its melting point. The specimens were heated in a
defined program according to Fehler! Verweisquelle konnte nicht gefunden
werden.. The isothermal temperatures (Tiso) were determined as
temperatures above measureable crystallization in dynamic DSC runs. The
heat flows and crystallization times (the time between the beginning of
the isothermal measurement t0 and crystallization peak [t.sub.pc]) were
recorded and a model for crystallization kinetics could be derived. For
the calculation the common Sestak-Berggren kinetic model for isothermal
crystallization was used. (Sestak and Berggren, 1971) In order to
describe the change of crystallization rate as a function of
temperature, the Arrhenius equation was used for homogeneous kinetics in
isothermal processes (ASTM, 2008). Subsequently, the activation energy
for crystallization can be calculated from the gradient of the
approximated straight line. The gradient describes the influence of
temperature shifts on the crystallization.
ln[[DELTA][t.sub.pc]] = - [E.sub.A]/R[T.sub.iso] + c (1)
[E.sub.A] = activation energy (J/mol)
R = gas constant (8.314 (J/mol K)
[T.sub.iso] = isothermal temperature (K)
c = constant
Having determined the admitted building temperatures in previous
thermoanalytical tests, reference specimens were produced from POM,
PE-HD, PP and PA12 on a modified DTM Sinterstation 2000 following
different irradiation strategies.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The time between phase changes was measured for different
isothermal temperatures for all polymers and the time-stability of the
two-phase area was analyzed. By means of isothermal DSC measurements the
activation energy for crystallization was calculated. The results in
Tab. 1 show that POM and PEEK HP-3 have the highest activation energies.
Thus, the gradient for the function describing the phase transformation
due to crystallization is the highest in the measured temperature
interval. On the other hand, PP and PA12 have the lowest slope and
activation energy. Consequently, a temperature change, e.g. by adding
colder layers of powder, near the crystallization temperature is not as
severe for the beginning and the overall kinetics of crystallization,
which means that there is a two-phase area available over a long period
of time for the building process.
Fig. 3 presents microtome cuts taken from the upper regions of PA12
and POM tensile test bars, sintered at the LKT. Both images show that
big spherulites grow due to the isothermal conditions but especially in
the interface between surrounding powder and molten areas both materials
are significantly different. PA12 parts have molten particles on the
interface between part and surrounding powder bed acting as nuclei, Fig.
3 (left). In contrast to this effect with POM no unmolten particles are
visible, but oriented crystals on the upper surface of the cross section
indicating that crystallization took place before particles of the
subsequently applied layer could be molten, Fig. 3 (right). This
confirms, the findings of a fast crystallization at little undercooling
in isothermal measurements. All sintered samples have a high density
with few pores and defects.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
4. CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK
Considering process behavior (e.g. time dependent crystallization),
the investigated PA12 type certainly is an extremely robust material
compared to other investigated, faster crystallizing polymers like PEEK
HP-3 and POM. However, thanks to improvements in machine engineering,
the potential of other laser sintering powders for commercialization has
been stepped up, too. The results show that the existence of the
two-phase SLS model can not be generally transferred to all types of
polymers. Further research will focus on melting and crystallization but
also the kinetics and time-temperature behavior of phase-changes. For
the aim of direct manufacturing it is necessary to generate parts with
constant properties and quality by means of morphology and degree of
crystallinity. The thermoanalytical tests pointed out that it will be of
high importance to know about the whole built job instead of focusing on
single parameters on the surface of the building chamber only. Still
today's patents in this field just focus on controlling and
measuring the current layer instead of looking deeper into z-direction
(Chung Mark and Allanic, 2004). Finally, the presented concept is a
first approach to predict and simulate properties of laser sintered
components.
5. REFERENCES
ASTM. (2008) Standard Test Method for Kinetic Parameters by
Differential Scanning Calorimetry Using Isothermal Methods, Beuth
Verlag. pp. 1-11
Chung Mark, Allanic A.-L. (2004) Sintering using thermal image
feedback, European Patent Office, Munchen. pp. 10
Rietzel D., Kuhnlein F., Drummer D. (2010) Characterization of New
Thermoplastics for Additive Manufacturing by Selective Laser Sintering SPE Proceedings ANTEC
Rietzel D., Wendel B., Feulner R., Schmachtenberg E. (2008) New
Thermoplastic Powder for Selective Laser Sintering. Kunststoffe
International 98:42-45
Schmachtenberg E., Seul T. (2002) Model of isothermic laser
sintering. 60th Anual Technical Conference of the Society of Plastic
Engineers (ANTEC), San Francisco, California
Sestak J., Berggren G. (1971) Study of the kinetics of the
mechanism of solid-state reactions at increasing temperatures.
thermochimica acta 3:1-12
Tab. 1. Calculated activation energies
Fig. 3 presents microtome cuts taken from the upper regions of
PA12 and POM tensile test bars, sintered at the LKT. Both
images show that big spherulites grow due to the isothermal
Material Activation Energy [E.sub.A]
[kJ/mol]
PP 265,0 [+ or -] 24,3
PA12, PA2200 395,0 [+ or -] 216,2
PBT 521,5 [+ or -] 47,0
PE-HD 578,5 [+ or -] 70,0
PEK, PEEK-HP3 636,0 [+ or -] 21,3
POM 986,7 [+ or -] 29,5