Obtaining ferromagnetic bulk nanocrystalline alloys with high mechanical strength.
Buzdugan, Dragos ; Codrean, Cosmin ; Serban, Viorel Aurel 等
1. INTRODUCTION
Year 1988 is considered by most experts as the year of the first
discovery of ferromagnetic nanocrystalline alloys. Yoshizawa and his
colleagues showed on Fe-Cu-Nb-Si-B and later on Fe-Cu-M-B-Si family
(where M = Nb, V, Mo, Zr) nanocrystallized alloys, exceptional magnetic
characteristics: saturation induction of 1.2 T, low coercivity, magnetic
permeability at high frequencies above [10.sup.3] (Codrean et al.,
2007). These alloys named "Finemet" are the first family of
ferromagnetic nanomaterials with significant economic impact.
They are followed by nanoalloys called "Nanoperm" (Fe-M-B
families, with M = Zr, Nb, Hf) recommended for special applications,
mostly in manufacture of power transformers (Codrean et al., 2007).
Meanwhile, the strength of nanocrystalline alloys is higher than
crystalline and even amorphous alloys. It is well known that grain size
is affecting the limit of elasticity, resistance properties and the
deformability of materials. Thus, for [Al.sub.85][Ni.sub.5][Y.sub.10]
alloy nanocrystallized by controlled devitrification have been noticed
spectacular increases in hardness compared to the amorphous state (with
20-40%) and compared with best conventionally cast crystalline aluminium
alloy and heat-treated later (200-300%) (Inoue et al., 2000).
Therefore, the purpose of this work is to determine the mechanical
characteristics of ferromagnetic nanocrystalline alloys and how are
influenced by their chemical composition.
2. ELABORATION OF THE NANOCRYSTALLINE ALLOYS AS RODS
One of the obtaining methods of ferromagnetic alloys with
nanocrystalline structure is based on ultrarapid melt cooling.
The first step to get nanocrystalline alloys was to obtain a master
alloy in form of bars, with an optimal chemical composition.
In our previous researches, the used chemical compositions in order
to obtain the nanocrystalline alloys were:
[Fe.sub.75-x][Cr.sub.x][Ga.sub.4][P.sub.13][Si.sub.5][C.sub.3], where x
= 2, 3, 4, 5 [Serban et al., 2009]. The elaboration of the master alloy
was done by melting induction in argon atmosphere of the raw materials:
iron based alloys Fe-P, Fe-C, Fe-Si and high purity powders of Cr and
Ga. Microscopic structure of the master alloy revealed the presence of a
fine eutectic and some dendritic crystals which belong to a solid
solution based on iron (Fig. 1).According to previous experiments, the
elaboration of bulk nanocrystalline alloys as rods of 2 mm diameter was
achieved by copper mold casting (Fig. 2). The technology of elaboration
involves the following steps:
--cutting the master alloy to obtain sections of 5 grams;
--inserting the master alloy into the quartz crucible which has at
the bottom an evacuate nozzle of the melt with 1 mm in diameter. In this
crucible the master alloy is remelted by induction in argon atmosphere;
--melt ejection into the cavity of the mold.
The main used parameters of the process were:
--process temperature is 100 [degrees]C higher than fusion
temperature of the alloy
--overpressure applied on melt: 0,25 atm
Following these steps rods with 2 mm in diameter and 20-25 mm
length were obtained (Fig. 3), marked according to Table 1.
The rods thus obtained were structurally analyzed by X-ray
diffraction, performed on a DRON 3 diffractometer, using Mo radiation
and wave length [alpha] = 0,71 [Angstrom]. The diffraction pattern
obtained (Fig. 4) indicates a nano crystalline structure, reduced
intensity peaks belong to a supersaturated solid solution based on iron.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
It can be noticed also that an increased content of chromium leads,
in the same cooling conditions, to a light increase of crystals,
evidenced by enlargement of intensity of top interferences.
4. MAGNETIC AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE OBTAINED ALLOYS
Nanocrystalline alloys proved to have excellent soft magnetic
properties, better than crystalline and even amorphous alloys because of
the crystalline grains dimension.
The coercivity of crystalline alloys depends strongly of their size
because the magnetic domain walls interact with the grain boundaries. As
the grain size decreases, Hc growths and reaches to a maximum value for
grain sizes of approximately 100 nm. Further grain size reduction leads
to a rapid decreasing of coercivity which varies by D6 law (Scwarz et
al., 2004).
Magnetic characterization of the elaborated alloys was performed
with a VSM 880 vibrating sample magnetometer. Figure 5 shows the
hysteresis loop for the obtained alloys.
It can be noticed that these alloys present good soft magnetic
properties (coercive field beetwen 1.24 and 1.91 kA/m) and the higher Cr
content alloy has both high saturation magnetization and high coercive
field.
Mechanical properties of the elaborated alloys were determined by
micro-hardness measurements and compression tests. Compression tests
were performed on an Instron machine. The speed of load implementation
was 5 x [10.sup.-4] [s.sup.-1]. Microhardness tests were performed on a
digitally Volpert Micro Vickers Hardness Tester using a load of 500
grams.
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]
Compression curves obtained (Fig. 6) shows a brittle behaviour of
alloys. However, for alloys with less chromium is remarkable a little
plastic deformation before breaking. Values obtained from compression
and microhardness tests are shown in Table 2.
5. CONCLUSIONS
The nanocrystalline structures can be obtained by ultrarapid melt
cooling. The researches performed showed the possibility of obtaining
ferromagnetic bulk nanocrystalline alloys of Fe-Cr-Ga-P-Si-C as rod form
by copper mold casting. The elaborated alloys have high mechanical
strength, presenting a fragile behaviour during compression test. It was
found that with increasing the content of chromium increases the
mechanical strength (hardness and compression strength). The further
work will be focussed on the obtaining of bulk nanocrystalline
ferromagnetic alloy in shape of socket used for magnetic shielding.
6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The studies were performed in frame of the researh project ID_18,
financed by UEFISCSU, research contract no.66/2007.
7. REFERENCES
Codrean, C. Serban, V.A. (2007) Amorphous and nanocrystalline
alloys, (Ed. Politehnica, Timisoara,), pp. 94-96
Inoue, A. Koshiba, H Itoi, T. (2000) Ferromagnetic Bulk Glassy
Alloys with Useful Engineering properties, Materials Science forum,
Vols.343-346, pp. 81-89
Hu, K Liu, L Chan, K.C. Pan, M. Wang, W. (2006) The effect of
crystallization on microstructure and magnetic properties of
[Fe.sub.61][Co.sub.7][Zr.sub.9]5[Mo.sub.5][W.sub.2][B.sub.15.5] bulk
metallic glass, Materials Letters 60, pp.1080-1084
Serban, V.A. Codrean, C. Utu, D. (2009) Bulk amorphous soft
magnetic iron based alloy with mechanical strength and corrosion
resistance, Key Engineering Materials Vol. 399 pp. 37-42
Schwarz, R.B. Shen, T.D. Harms, U. Lillo, T. (2004) Soft
ferromagnetism in amorphous and nanocrystalline alloys, Journal of
Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 283 pp.223-230
Tab. 1. The mark of the obtained rods
Chemical compositions, % at. Mark
[Fe.sub.73] [Cr.sub.2] [Ga.sub.4] NB2
[P.sub.13] [Si.sub.5] [C.sub.3]
[Fe.sub.72] [Cr.sub.3] [Ga.sub.4] NB3
[P.sub.13] [Si.sub.5] [C.sub.3]
[Fe.sub.71] [Cr.sub.4] [Ga.sub.4] NB4
[P.sub.13] [Si.sub.5] [C.sub.3]
[Fe.sub.70] [Cr.sub.5] [Ga.sub.4] NB5
[P.sub.13] [Si.sub.5] [C.sub.3]
Tab. 2. The values of mechanical properties
Compresive
strength, Fracture
[[sigma].sub.f] [strain.sub.[epsilon]f],
Alloy [Gpa] [%]
NB2 1,80 1,90
NB3 1,97 1,82
NB4 2,14 1,77
NB5 2,38 1,68
Yield Yield
strength strain
[[sigma].sub.f] [strain.sub.[epsilon]f],
Alloy [Gpa] [%]
NB2 1,72 1,81
NB3 1,93 1,75
NB4 2,1 1,70
NB5 2,38 1,68
Vickers
Hardness
Alloy [HV.sub.0,5]
NB2 690
NB3 770
NB4 820
NB5 890