Plasticity and workability of aluminium alloy at recovery temperatures.
Kapustova, Maria ; Martinkovic, Maros ; Bilik, Jozef 等
1. INTRODUCTION
Temperature is an important argument for testing of metals in
agreed conditions. Plastic deformation is realized during cold forming of metals by slip and material is strain hardened. Warm forming passes
with partial strain hardening of metal above recovery temperature and
below temperature of recrystallization (Forejt & Piska, 2006).
Recovery removes microscopic and macroscopic stresses while physical and
partly plastic properties of metal improve. Values of tensile strength
and yield point decrease and formability increases. In this interval of
temperatures activated movement of dislocations occurs and their density
lowers due to annihilation. Plastic properties of metals are not
considered as linear function of temperature, therefore it is necessary
to accurately determine an appropriate interval of forming temperatures
at warm forming (Pernis, 2007).
2. EXPERIMENTS
The subject of workability research at increased temperatures is
aluminium alloy A2024--STN 424203.61 (natural ageing), chemical
specification AlCu4Mg1. This alloy, which belongs to the group
"2000" of aluminium alloys, has a main alloying element
Copper. Chemical composition of used alloy is in the table 1.
Alloy AlCu4Mg1 (duralumin) is an age-hardenable alloy determined
primarily for hot forming at temperature interval 340-450 [degrees]C.
This alloy is characterizing by high tensile strength, which comes up to
470 MPa after hardening and it is possible to be increased by forming.
Corrosion resistant of this alloy is relatively low. Alloy is widely
applicable in automotive and aviation industry in production of various
structural elements. Suitability of examined alloy for warm bulk forming
was considered by tensile test at higher temperatures. Cylindrical bar
tensile test specimens were used. The gage length was 60mm, diameter
8mm. The specimens were tested at room temperature and at temperatures
150, 200, 220, 240, 250 and 260 [degrees]C. Higher temperatures
represent a temperature interval of warm forming of aluminium alloy.
3. RESULTS
Strength limit Rm, characteristics of plasticity for warm
workability (reduction of area Z and index of plasticity according to
Kolmogorov [[lambda].sub.R]), strain hardness curves and exponent of
strain hardness were calculated from measured results at each tested
temperatures. Temperature course of tensile strength is in fig. 1,
temperature course of percentage reduction of area is in fig.2,
temperature course of index of plasticity is in fig.3
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
Based on the results it is obvious that value of percentage
reduction of area at temperature 250 [degrees]C was 1,5 times higher
then the value at room temperature. This fact suggests grow of material
plastic properties in warm conditions. Index of plasticity according to
Kolmogorov has similar course as reduction of area and it proves
increase of plasticity in dependence on temperature as well.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
The strain hardness curves depict course of true stress in
dependence on strain, up to the tensile strength point where plastic
deformation stability is lost. Strain hardness curves of alloy AlCu4Mg1
are in figure 4. It is evident that material was less resistant with
increasing temperature and the area of equilibrium plastic deformation
decreased. Great differences between hardness curves at 250[degrees]C
and 260[degrees]C proves that 250[degrees]C is limited recrystallization
temperature of the alloy, range of plastic deformation rapidly
decreased. Table 2 provides calculated values of strain hardening index
at examined temperatures. Over 250[degrees]C its value rapidly
decreased.
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
3. NUMERIC SIMULATION
Research of workability of alloy AlCu4Mg1 in warm conditions is
important for users of simulation software in term of spreading of
material databases. Simulation software is necessary for simulation of
material flow in forming tool. This software enables arrangement of
tools still in preparation stage and thus saves production costs
(Spisak, 2000). On the basis of experimental results an optimal warm
forging temperature was recommended for the alloy AlCu4Mg1. An example
of numeric simulation of plastic flow at temperature 250 [degrees]C was
applied to forging of drop forging in closed die (Cermak, 2000). Defined
input conditions for simulation of forging process of drop forging with
ring shape in simulation Programme MSC SuperForge was used. Optimized
input data: Crank press LZK 1000--friction 0.1, die temperature
150[degrees] C; semiproduct**cylinder [empty set]40x24 mm, aluminium
alloy A2024, workpiece temperature 250[degrees]C. Results of forging
process simulation are in fig. 5.
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
4. CONCLUSION
On the basis of mentioned results it is possible to apply the
technology of warm forging to small and medium drop forgings with simple
and not rugged shapes. Before forging of semiproduct at 250[degrees]C it
is necessary to heat dies at temperature 150 [degrees]C because small
drop forgings get cold quickly. Thus this process prevents significant
decrease of temperature while heated semi-product is in contact with
tool and required higher plastic properties of material are provided It
lead to greater lifetime of dies too (Hires at al., 2009).
5. REFERENCES
Cermak, J. (2000). FORM 2000, Near net-shape closed-die forging,
pp. 43-46, ISBN 80-214-1661-0, Brno, September 19.--20. 2000, TU Brno,
Brno
Forejt, M. & Piska, M. (2006). Theory of machining, forming and
tools, CERM, ISBN 80-214-2374-9, Brno
Hires, O; Pernis, R. & Kasala, J. (2009). How to solve lifetime
of forging dies. Forging. No.35, 2009, pp. 7-10, ISSN 1213-9829
Pernis, R. (2007). Theory of metal forming, TnUAD, ISBN
978-80-8075-244-6, Trencin
Spisak, E. (2000). Mathematic modelling and simulation of
technological processes, Typo Press, ISBN 80-7099-530-0, Kosice
Tab. 1. Chemical composition of STN 424203 alloy
Chemical composition (wt.%)
Cu Mg Mn Fe Si Zn Ti Ni Al
min 3,8 1,2 0,4 max max max max max bal.
max 4,8 1,8 1,1 0,5 0,5 0,2 0,2 0,1
Tab. 2. Values of strain hardening index
Temperature [[degrees]C] 200 220 240 250 260
Strain hardening 0,071 0,078 0,062 0,042 0,011
index